Slashdot Mirror


Code42 Says Crashplan Backup Service Will Discontinue All Personal Backup Plans (crashplan.com)

Reader amxcoder writes: Code42, the company behind the popular Crashplan online backup service has announced that will be discontinuing all of its personal and family backup plan offerings to focus on business backup service plans only. In the letter sent to existing personal plan customers, it says that next year will be the cutoff date for personal plans and all existing personal plan holders will have to upgrade their subscriptions to more expensive business plans or leave for another provider after current subscription runs out. Crashplan personal and family services were one of the best (and most affordable) options available for online backup, providing features that other rivals do not, including backup options for cloud, external local drives, and to other friends/family member's drives (trusted offsite). Looking at Carbonite services (who Code42 is recommending existing personal subscribers switch to), does not offer many of the options and features in their backup software, including multiple backup sets, unlimited deleted file retention, the trusted offsite options and any type of 'family subscription' offerings. Here is a statement from the Code42 CEO Joe Payne.

137 comments

  1. Yeah, but it's not a problem... by halivar · · Score: 0

    ...because everyone has a backup of the backup, right? It's supposed to be backups, all the way down...

    1. Re:Yeah, but it's not a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because everyone has a backup of the backup, right? It's supposed to be backups, all the way down...

      Wait! Back up a second. What?

    2. Re:Yeah, but it's not a problem... by halivar · · Score: 1

      I assure you, I back up all the seconds!

    3. Re:Yeah, but it's not a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an idiot trusts a third party with backups. Especially a third party who offers "cloud backups" because they WILL pull bullshit like this.

      My backups aren't going anywhere. They aren't going to disappear, raise in cost or be held ransom.

    4. Re:Yeah, but it's not a problem... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      You can trust some cloud-based backups, for example these guys meticulously back up everything, and never throw anything away.

  2. First I've Heard Of It by friedmud · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use them for personal backup... this is the first I've heard of this! I just went and searched my email and didn't find anything.

    This is definitely a shame! One of the things I liked most about their service is that it was easy to setup with black/white lists on what to back up. I really only wanted a backup for my photography hobby... everything else is backed up fine via Time Machine (and I rotate a drive offsite). Crashplan dealt well with this.

    Anyway - nothing to do about it now. I'll start shopping around...

    1. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes you wonder how much damage could be done to a company's business by an unscrupulous Fake News post here on /. Would /. be legally liable? Hypothetically, of course.

    2. Re:First I've Heard Of It by juancn · · Score: 1

      Try Backblaze, I've been using them for several years.

    3. Re:First I've Heard Of It by parkinglot777 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Makes you wonder how much damage could be done to a company's business by an unscrupulous Fake News post here on /. Would /. be legally liable? Hypothetically, of course.

      What is fake news? You didn't even go to the link and make an assumption that the link is fake news???

      Effective August 22, 2017, Code42 will no longer offer new – or renew – CrashPlan for Home subscriptions, and we will begin to sunset the product over several months. CrashPlan for Home will no longer be available for use starting October 23, 2018.

      That's what on their official website (crashplan.com). In other words, those who have their plan can still use but will not be able to renew. Those who wants to get a new plan will not be able to get. Where is fake news you are talking about here?

    4. Re:First I've Heard Of It by friedmud · · Score: 2

      I did look into Backblaze a few years ago. At the time it seemed like they made it difficult to select just _one_ directory to backup... it _really_ wanted to backup your whole computer.

      Has that changed?

    5. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, Google filtered the email announcement into the "Promotions" folder. You may find it there... or in Spam. Bloody shame about this, either way. I would have been happy to keep giving them (too much) money for an all-you-can-eat family plan.

    6. Re:First I've Heard Of It by suutar · · Score: 1

      I got an email this morning. It seems like the main thing that they're dropping is the "unlimited computers for a flat rate" (raising the rate for a single computer is also there, but not as big a change imho).

      So, looks like it's time to teach everything how to back up to the file server in a format that I can then make crashplan SMB (or something else) back up as data files. *sigh*

    7. Re:First I've Heard Of It by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

      Yes, Backblaze regularly advertises on Slashdot ... Oh, wait! Those are STORIES!

    8. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Same here.

      What I would have liked is a more granular schedule. Weekly backups would have sufficed for my setup.

    9. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the part about how the SMB version doesn't supprt unlimited size backups. I think you are limited to something like 500GB.

    10. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use the many benefits of Photos in iCloud?

    11. Re: First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Backblaze is not equivalent. They don't have a Linux agent, among other deficiencies.

    12. Re:First I've Heard Of It by enderwiggen · · Score: 1

      Where does it say that? Per https://www.crashplan.com/en-us/business/ it says "Unlimited Storage... No storage size limits, bandwidth caps or file-type restrictions".

      All this is really doing is making it so you can't have unlimited devices for free. I have a single linux box that acts as a central file store. My family can access it from pretty much any device in the house and I have a single crashplan instance on that linux box to backup to the cloud. All I have to do is migrate my account from home to small business and then the rate goes from $100/year to $10/month.

    13. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Kokuyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Backblaze doesn't support Linux...

    14. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just sent me an email giving me 3 more months.

      I was paying the $150/year for the multiple machines.

      They want $10/month per device to convert.

    15. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From their migration faq (https://www.crashplanpro.com/migration/#/)

      Continue your backups without starting over. You can migrate your cloud backups (5 TB or smaller) and all local backups.

      So it was 5TB, not 500GB. But my backups are bigger than that. So I'm not sure what happens when I migrate. But my guess is that I loose my big backups and then all my backups are capped at 5TB.

      If it were just about not having unlimited computers, I wouldn't have a problem with that. But that's kind of stupid because all you have to do is cross mount all your computers onto a server and back them up from there. Same effect. I suspect this is about both charging per computer and keeping the backups small.

    16. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the small business option for Crashplan. It's only $10 a month, which should be fine if you're already pleased with the way their service works.

    17. Re:First I've Heard Of It by enderwiggen · · Score: 1

      Looks like it has to do with the way the transfer works. I bet you could backup more than 5 TB, but you've got to re-upload it.

      From https://support.crashplan.com/Subscriptions/Migrate_your_CrashPlan_for_Home_account_to_CrashPlan_for_Small_Business

      What happens to my cloud backups to CrashPlan Central?
      Most backups to CrashPlan Central continue automatically.

      There is one exception: cloud backups that are larger than 5 TB cannot be migrated to CrashPlan for Small Business, due to technical platform constraints.

      If one of your computers has more than 5 TB of data backed up to CrashPlan Central, that computer's cloud backup is permanently lost when you migrate. That computer starts a new backup when you migrate your account to CrashPlan for Small Business. Local backups on that same computer are not affected.

    18. Re:First I've Heard Of It by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Curious: why would you not want to backup your whole computer?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    19. Re:First I've Heard Of It by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      You realize the client had options to make the backups as granular as you wanted right. You could even create multiple backup sets that operated on different schedules, and even to different destinations.

    20. Re:First I've Heard Of It by praxis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Backing up data costs time and money. Why back up data that's easily recreated? The operating system and installed software can easily be recreated. User data and settings are not. Those are higher-value targets for backing up. Different people draw the line in a different place.

    21. Re:First I've Heard Of It by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Except I had the Family plan which offered 10 PC's for $150/yr. While I wasn't using all 10 slots of my Family Plan license, I do have at least 3 PC's backing up to it.

      Using the new SMB plan, I'd have to pay $360/yr for just those same 3 PC's. If I have another pc or so, it goes up from there. The problem with this, is while my laptop and the main file server PC in the house have a good amount of data, my kids PC's have only a few hundred MB or maybe a GB of data that rarely changes all that much. Paying $10/mo for those PC's is not worth it compared too the file server that has all our banking records, family photos/videos, and other irreplaceable data.

      You are also not realizing that the client for the SMB service does not seem to support local backups and backups to other offsite PC's like the current client does. Also, the current client was free to use if you didn't want to backup to their cloud service, so you could still use all the features for local backups

    22. Re:First I've Heard Of It by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Backblaze doesn't support Linux...

      Their backup client doesn't. However, was doing some research this morning and they now offer a bulk storage service with a public API, in a similar vein to Amazon S3 or Glacier. Was on Crashplan myself, and am now looking at pulling something together that relies either on this Backblaze B2 service, or on Glacier.

      They get you with download fees as well, of course, but if I'm recovering from a data loss that'll be the least of my concerns.

    23. Re:First I've Heard Of It by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Their client software is still crap.

      I recommend SpiderOak. The client has a reasonable GUI that lets you select exactly what to back up, and can also run from the command line.

      As an alternative there are a few apps that support general cloud storage services like Google Nearline and Amazon S3.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:First I've Heard Of It by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, Backblaze B2 is platform-independent. You just need to find a client to upload/download from it. If you are a fan of linux, check out https://rclone.org/ (I'm not affiliated with this project)

    25. Re:First I've Heard Of It by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Curious: why would you not want to backup your whole computer?

      Size of backup set, bandwidth, temp files, confidential files, external drives, etc.
      I have decent service, did the math, and I can not back up all my data over my connection in a reasonable amount of time, or even in an unreasonable amount of time.

      Your question isn't even a complete question. You either mean whole computer to include partition tables, MBR, etc, in which case there are loads of good reasons not to want that (or to want a file based backup and recover more), or you are already excluding items in the assumption that what filesystems are currently mounted is what I want backed up.

      Regardless, there are very very good reasons to have support for excluding files and directories.

    26. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Linux sucks donkey cocks as an application platform.

    27. Re:First I've Heard Of It by shellster_dude · · Score: 2

      I've used (use) Crashplan and previously used BackBlaze. BackBlaze has the worst restore process I have ever been unfortunate enough to need. You have to manually select files and folders to zip up, then wait considerable lengths of time for the zip file to be created (and there are size limit that are ridiculous). They limit uploads and downloads. If you zip file download fails (which happened multiple times to me), you can't restart the download. You have to start over. Also when you start over the zip may have expired on you because they are only good for 48 hours before they get deleted and you have to start all over again. It was absolutely terrible.

    28. Re:First I've Heard Of It by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Because syncing is not backup. Does iCloud support file versioning? Real time backup? Deleted file retention? What benefits are you referring to? Getting your account hacked and pics leaked on the internet? Deleting your local pics to have your iCloud pics get deleted to? Not to mention it's an Apple product that is meant for Apple devices, they may have some support for windows now, but it's ultimately made for Apple products, which I own exactly 0 of.

    29. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Illogical+Spock · · Score: 1

      It's my backup solution too. But the offer they made looks good to me: if you migrate to the Small Business plan, you will not be billed until the end of your current subscription (plus 2 months - they extended everyone's subscription), then you will have 75% off for a year in the Small Business plan (normal price US$ 10,00 a month, therefore you'll pay US$ 2,50 a month for a year, half the price of the Home Plan) and only then you will pay the full price (US$ 10,00 a month). Yes, the new price is double the Home Plan price, but I think it's still worth it. I'm with them for years and years and never had a problem.

      --
      --- Illogical Spock
    30. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the post as a purely hypothetical statement. Given how much people were shocked and dismayed about the news it seems a fake post along similar lines to this real post but for another company could be harmful - perhaps not.

    31. Re:First I've Heard Of It by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Except I had the Family plan which offered 10 PC's for $150/yr. While I wasn't using all 10 slots of my Family Plan license, I do have at least 3 PC's backing up to it.

      Yeah, that's the real casualty here. And I think this is why they are sunsetting it... it was too good for business users, and it was likely cannibalizing SMB sales.

      For me... between the fact that my subscription is good to like August 2018, and then the deal to roll into small business for free and then 75% off for a year... I'm probably going to stick with crashplan for a while.

      I like it for the linux support, and I've actually used the recovery features to restore after a big windows server crash, and the restore process wasn't too painful at all; something not true of all services.

      You are also not realizing that the client for the SMB service does not seem to support local backups and backups to other offsite PC's like the current client does.

      Other PCs no, but local backups to local media, i believe it DOES support. I was just reading about it.

    32. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Un-Thesis · · Score: 0

      I will never trust the Cloud with my backups. Too ephemeral!!

      --
      Promote freedom; fight fascism.
    33. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension failure by parkinglot777. How embarassing.

    34. Re: First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under proposed legislation, anyone found using the terms "fake news" or "false flag" shall be banned from the Internet for life plus one day.

    35. Re: First I've Heard Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing worse than a loose backup.

    36. Re:First I've Heard Of It by kriston · · Score: 1

      That fee is per computer. If you have more than a few computers that you want to back up it costs far more than the Family plan.

      --

      Kriston

    37. Re:First I've Heard Of It by Illogical+Spock · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right, sorry. In my case it's not a problem (I back up only one computer), but for people that pays for the family plan and backs up more than one it's way more expensive.

      --
      --- Illogical Spock
    38. Re:First I've Heard Of It by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension failure by parkinglot777. How embarassing.

      You are the one who failed reading comprehension. The statement alone wouldn't apply to my response. However, the AC replied to GP which implied (or generalized) that this (or any) topic on ./ is a fake news which could result in damaging the business (in this case, it is code42). I directly responded that it was the truth (and quote what the official site said).

      You, on the other hand, are similar to the other AC who did NOT read the whole things but rather made your own assumption. And then hide behind AC so that you wouldn't be embarrassed by your own failure.

  3. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you constantly backup to one of the external drives and keep one offsite? And swap them every few hours? If not you don't know what you are talking about. Offsite backup is required.

  4. Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should have read those e-mails before deleting them...

  5. Personal backups are a waste of money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I need my old files, I will file a FOIA request with he NSA.

  6. Re:'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    External hard drive will not protect my data from a house disaster like a fire or an hurricane! This is why I felt for a CLOUD meme like you said.

  7. See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't trust those promise making fuckers - ever.

    Crashplan online backup service has announced that will be discontinuing all of its personal and family backup plan offerings...

    Yeah, .... do NOT trust any business. The "Cloud" is a fraud.

    1. Re:See folks ..... by Pascoea · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I mean, I understand your sentiment. But this seems like a company exiting a business the right way. Notifying and giving customers ample time to find a replacement. Would you rather they just shut their business down and put up a "fuck you" landing page? Further, what is your suggestion for Joe and Jane User for their backup solution? Here are the requirements: 1) Little to no computer knowledge needed. 2) Replicated off-site. 3) 5-10$/month 4) Hands-off backup.

      A solution that meets your average user's needs is not possible without "the cloud"

    2. Re:See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, I understand your sentiment. But this seems like a company exiting a business the right way. Notifying and giving customers ample time to find a replacement.

      And they recommend a replacement that does not support Linux. Terrific.

    3. Re:See folks ..... by dbrueck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree - I'm sad to see them go, but it's really hard to draw the "don't trust the cloud" conclusion from this: I paid them money, they provided a service. They haven't lost my data, and they are committing to continue providing the promised service through the end of my contract with them.

    4. Re:See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they think Linux users can make their own storage out of mud and sticks.

    5. Re:See folks ..... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      As one option. The other option is using their relatively inexpensive SMB service that does.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    6. Re:See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...that meets your average user's needs...

      Average users have been groomed to feel they need professional external management. Users have been, (and could be again), very empowered. I mean what's so difficult about scheduling an automatic backup to their own NAS or heaven forbid- a USB attached external HDD?

      People don't need cloud management solutions. They've been marketed to that they do-

    7. Re:See folks ..... by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      I mean what's so difficult about scheduling an automatic backup to their own NAS or heaven forbid- a USB attached external HDD?

      2) Replicated off-site.

      A USB Solution/NAS does you no good when your house burns down, gets flooded, computer gets stolen, etc.

    8. Re:See folks ..... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Further, what is your suggestion for Joe and Jane User for their backup solution? Here are the requirements: 1) Little to no computer knowledge needed. 2) Replicated off-site. 3) 5-10$/month 4) Hands-off backup.

      A solution that meets your average user's needs is not possible without "the cloud"

      Have you considered this can't be delivered as priced? There's a reason Code42 is dropping personal backups and making people take pricier business plans if they want to stay. Support costs for individual accounts of people with "little to no computer knowledge" might be part of that. Those costs would be lower if a business IT employee is handling that, on an account with a higher-priced plan.

    9. Re:See folks ..... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Because they think Linux users can make their own storage out of mud and sticks.

      rsync -mud -sticks

    10. Re:See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also offering a small business plan that is only 10$/mo/device and they'll transfer your existing account if you signup.

      https://www.crashplanpro.com/migration/?_ga=2.92883549.1361615685.1503408743-599756317.1495809377#/

    11. Re:See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you work off the USB drive directly and take it with you like you would your keys and wallet then you wouldn't have to worry about those freak acts of nature you talked about. A simple rsync or robocopy command to your host computer(s) would keep you replicated. If you happen to lose your USB key then it would be an easy matter of restoring from a local copy. Encrypt a 256gb USB drive and you're set (for most use cases anyway, you'll have to accept that your 4tb porn collection is more ephemeral than your tax documents ;)

    12. Re: See folks ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usb stick works with wife on linux (reportedly more pleasing to use than windows). I just refused to support windows when the install failed and worked out so well wife refuse to buy windows laptops anymore.

    13. Re:See folks ..... by schweini · · Score: 1

      I just checked, and it seems that their Crashplan's business plans cost 10$/per device (unlimited storage). If I'm not overseeing anything, I think I'll be simply switching to that, because I've only had great experiences with them.

  8. If you're a CrashPlan business subscriber by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You might want to do some due diligence and see whether it makes sense to move your cloud backups elsewhere - or at least set up an account with a second backup provider. Businesses don't retrench for no reason - these guys may be in trouble.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:If you're a CrashPlan business subscriber by Athanasius · · Score: 1

      You'd think any business subscriber would also have the sense to subscribe to, and use, at least two such services....

    2. Re:If you're a CrashPlan business subscriber by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      I don't think so. My guess based on a non-technical friend who does have a business account for his one-man-show is that the cost of supporting recovery just doesn't make the base tier work financially. He must have spent 12 hours on the phone with them trying to get things back (partially due to poor UI design). BUT, he swears by them with enough confidence that I was contemplating going to them for off-site backup.

      I don't think they can really provide the same level of service at the personal account tier; it makes sense to go up the ranks.

      Personally, I'll stick with multiple external hard drives in multiple locations, but if I wasn't comfortable with that $120/year wouldn't be that big of a deal.

    3. Re:If you're a CrashPlan business subscriber by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You'd think any business subscriber would also have the sense to subscribe to, and use, at least two such services....

      Unfortunately, I've seen too many stories with a central theme of catastrophic business data loss to believe that.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  9. My first cloud backup by krouic · · Score: 2

    It took me several months to backup my data to CrashPlan - now it's back to square one...
    Call me an old fart, but the more I read, the less I'm trusting this cloud thing.

    1. Re:My first cloud backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as the cloud. It is business speak for "someone else's computer".

    2. Re:My first cloud backup by praxis · · Score: 1

      If your upstream network is slow enough to require months to back up your data, you might look into a service that allows you to mail them physical media.

    3. Re:My first cloud backup by TheGreatNico · · Score: 1

      They throttle the heck out if it. 100/100 and I got ~750k up on average. Took almost a year to finish 7tb

    4. Re:My first cloud backup by praxis · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. My slightly less than terabyte backed up overnight. I didn't check the upload speed but it certainly didn't feel throttled.

  10. Geocities...in the cloud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the lesson is important. The internet and hence the cloud can't be depended upon long term.

    1. Re:Geocities...in the cloud. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Crashplan is not "the cloud". It's backup software that has "cloud" storage as one element. You can use it for free without cloud storage, or you can pay them to host your backups. This is no different than open source solutions, but as usual you are at the mercy of the company who makes and supports the software. Anyway, I have a year to find another solution so it's not exactly an emergency. Worst case I could just rsync (or similar) the crashplan directory on my server to any provider that supports rsync. Suggestions?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re: Geocities...in the cloud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, lets get this straight for the last time. "The cloud" simply means, "someone else's computer."

    3. Re: Geocities...in the cloud. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      OK? What in my post contradicts that?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  11. Re:'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cloud was not a requirement of the Home product. CPP offered computer to computer backups, across the network as well as local copies to drives. This change by the company eliminates the free model and removes the ability to even retrieve your data from the program after the Oct 2018 date, unless of course you pay for their services through the small business or Carbonite solutions.

  12. At least they gave plenty of time by Immerial · · Score: 2

    The message I got said that I had until 09/28/2018... which is plenty of time to figure something out. But 5x the price... ouch! The Carbonite side is a little bit better... ~2x more than what I was paying but with less functionality. :`( Well at least I've got time to think about it.

  13. Alternatives? by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    It's nice that they point to another backup solution but as far as I can see, they don't support Linux... just like Backblaze. So... where does that leave me?

    1. Re:Alternatives? by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I use SpliderOak One. I'm a big fan. It is coin operated, but it works and has saved me a lot of pain and frustration.

  14. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Because if I have a house fire or robbery, I don't want to lose all of my photos and videos. I can "offsite" my backup to work or a friend's house, but honestly it's worth the $100/year to not need to do that. "The cloud" is also great because when I set up a friend or family member's computer, I point it at my basement server. When they drop the computer, it gets stolen, or even if it just gets crapped up/ransomed - no biggie, my free tech support just got much simpler.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  15. Not a way to win customers or advocates by sizzlinkitty · · Score: 2

    I didn't hear about this till it showed up in slashdot, then found it in my email. I converted my yearly pre-paid account to monthly after the new year because of the lack of deals. My account renewed on the 15th of this month and in the notification email, it states, I will have an extra 60 days to move my data, but my new subscription expiration date is 9/15/2017.

    I will no longer advocate for my employers to use this as a backup solution.

  16. Hey Crashplan!!! Carbonite does NOT support LINUX! by Danathar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks like Crashplan is going to screw Linux users as Carbonite does not support Linux as far as I can tell. I have 2TB of stuff backed up to Crashplan. That took me MONTHS to complete.

  17. Client replacemnet by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 2

    Hmm... to me, the best thing about CrashPlan was the client. It would let me backup machine-to-mahcine, to a local drive, to a network drive, or to Crashplan Cloud -- all seamlessly from the same interface. I understand that the only thing they're eliminating is the cloud for home users product... but it seem from their site that they're also eliminating access to the client unless you have a Small Business account with a login to download the new ones.

    Really, I bought their cloud product mostly because their client was good and their price was reasonable. Anyone know of a good and well-supported cross-platform client that lets you do machine-to-machine, NAS and cloud backups that maybe uses something like S3 or Glacier?

    1. Re:Client replacemnet by Paco103 · · Score: 2

      Completely agree. I use it for peer to peer backup. I have plenty of access to computers in remote locations. I'd even buy a license for the software for a reasonable cost to continue this model. Anyone have any recommendations for good easy to use peer to peer backup with client side encryption? First person to recommend an rsync script gets smacked in the face with a large trout.

    2. Re:Client replacemnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about tarsnap?

    3. Re:Client replacemnet by suutar · · Score: 1

      Tarsnap looks interesting. Thanks for the pointer :)

    4. Re:Client replacemnet by Que_Ball · · Score: 1

      The peer to peer is the feature I have no really good drop in replacement for right now.

      I liked that it did not require VPN as it would arbitrate the connection between the peers in two different sites.  It worked well for small businesses (really small like less than 10 employees) where you often had the owner or someone who would setup a computer at home to use as a backup target.  They usually also subscribed to the cloud service but it was nice to have that copy of data nearby where someone could run home and get the drives and drive it back far faster than doing a large restore over the internet in case of a large dataloss like drive crash.

      The big thing was it generally worked on a home router without special configuration.  So if the owner with the backup at home upgrades their ISP and the installer brings a new router as an "upgrade" I don't get a call or email saying the backup stopped working because the custom firewall rules are gone.  Or more often they have a glitch in their Internet at home and step 2 of the phone call to the ISP to troubleshoot is to hold down the reset button for 5 seconds until it reboots with factory default settings.
      Seems like most alternatives want to use something like SFTP which is fine, except in a home router you likely need to setup port forwarding, DHCP reservation or static IP of the home computer/backup server, dynamic DNS client, and usually change the listening port to something the ISP isn't blocking on dynamic IP accounts.

      Looks like the fact they never charged for this part of the software wasn't sustainable.
      Alternatives I'm considering (none seem to have the peer to peer through NAT router feature)
      https://duplicacy.com/
      https://www.goodsync.com/business
      Still building a list, I'm sure I'm going to find more.  Some other replies mention software I need to check out like Spideroak
      Many of these websites have way too much marketing BS and not enough solid technical descriptions of what the product actually does and what it looks like doing it.  I'm really tired of deciphering the BS, I wish more products just gave a simple product tour as their primary marketing push.  A few screenshots goes a long way with me.

      Leaning to products that also support Backblaze B2 as a bring your own cloud storage option.  I doubt another cloud provider is offering anything like crashplan peer to peer destination which was totally unique in a backup to cloud product offering.

    5. Re:Client replacemnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duplicity can target S3 buckets.

  18. Re:Hey Crashplan!!! Carbonite does NOT support LIN by TimHS · · Score: 1

    Welcome to cloud backup... I'm in the same boat :(

  19. What about computer to computer backups? by caseih · · Score: 1

    The email is unclear, but will we also lose the ability to back up peer to peer? It seems so. Might be time to investigate a bittorrent solution to push my backup to several friends' computers and vice versa.

    1. Re:What about computer to computer backups? by suutar · · Score: 1

      Yes. Their business version does not support peer-to-peer. They do, however, support backing up to a local folder, and they have instructions on how to get the backup archives with your data moved from the other computer to a local filesystem (e.g. an external disk): https://support.crashplan.com/...

      But the only offsite target they're going to support appears to be themselves.

    2. Re:What about computer to computer backups? by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      I agree this is not specifically addressed...peer-to-peer or even local backup.

      My guess is that it all goes away, because the basic Crashplan Home software will simply cease to function.

    3. Re:What about computer to computer backups? by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      All peer to peer ceases as of Oct 22, 2018. FAQ is here - lots of info https://crashplanforhome.zende...

  20. 1 year to find a replacement by mpechner · · Score: 2

    Received a couple of notices. Not happy. I need to evaluate something for my dad and something for myself.
    One of the features I liked was knowing if something catastrophic occurs they would get a drive to me. Granted I use dual time machine drives, but still.

    So now to find another service that does that. Or pay them their $120 and sync data to one system. Which is probably what I will do. But not for my dad, put him on carbonite or something that uses S3 as a backend.

    I hope their business customers using the home service hands them a little hell.

    1. Re:1 year to find a replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backblaze offers to send a drive or USB stick.

    2. Re:1 year to find a replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pardon us, but we used low prices on huge resources that were totally unsustainable to capture marketshare and generate much publicity for our other services... we no longer need you low life cheapskates dragging down our margins, so bugger off."

    3. Re:1 year to find a replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider SpiderOak ONE. I use it for my Mom's machine. I was using it too but stopped because their mobile app is trash. Now I'm switching back, using the account I set up for my Mom. I rarely used the mobile app anyway.

      SpiderOak's advantage is unlimited number of machines per account, the disadvantage is limited storage. However they do de-duplication and compression, so 100 GiB on your local drive will be significantly less on their servers. They are offering a 30% discount for CrashPlan refugees, so I re-upped for 250 GB of storage for about $60 a year.

      I do not work for SpiderOak or gain anything by telling you about it. (Well, maybe I gain a bit in that more customers means more-likely to survive!)

  21. Ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't their entire business built on linux and proprietary bits attached to an open source software stack?

    But no support for doing linux backups?

    Sad, so sad. I guess that is why I never paid attention to them, other than the storage pod and the yearly hard disk analysis.

  22. Crashplan Business priced competitively by why-lurk · · Score: 1

    Really? You must have been paying a very low price for Crashplan Home if their Business plan is 5x for you.

    I was paying $5 a month, and under the new plan, would be paying $10. That's still a lot better than with Mozy and its high per-gig pricing, and pretty close to Carbonite (which has inferior features, esp. with its lack of Linux support). For my backup needs, Amazon S3 storage would also cost about $10 a month (with bring-your-own backup software), and Backblaze B2 would be about $2.50 a month. For either of those, I would need something like Arq or Duplicati to do the backups, and wouldn't have much in the way of customer service.

    I am still weighing my options, but I may well sign up for Crashplan Business, if it looks like the company is doing OK financially.

    1. Re:Crashplan Business priced competitively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crashplan had a family plan that was *unlimited* devices. The business plan is $10/mo *per device.*

    2. Re:Crashplan Business priced competitively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home plan was multiple devices for flat $150/year (figure based on my last renewal).

      Business is $10/mo per device.

      If you were backing up 5 devices the price goes from around $150/year to $600/year (minimum). The 75% discount doesn't factor in because eventually the price will be that high. Anyone changing their subscription now is just kicking the can down the road.

      No way the average home subscriber like me is going to stick with Crashplan even though the UI and functionality is way superior to everyone else. Especially seamless Linux support which was a high-priority for my mixed OS environment. Just plug-n-play for those without tinkering time...that's the second biggest factor here (after price).

      Kicking out the plebes like me may be what they want, and it's fine. Gets rid of them in one shot, become more profitable by focusing solely on B2B.

      Sigh.

    3. Re:Crashplan Business priced competitively by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      It can easily be that. If you only had one PC, then the new price is about 2X the old cost. Not great, but not too bad. However, they offered a "Family Plan" that was "up to 10 PC's" for a fixed $150/yr. So depending on how many PC's you had in that range, the cost can easily be 5X the old price to keep those PC's backed up now.

      I myself had this plan (and many others did too), and even if you only had 5 PC's in your house (figure family of 4 each with PC and a home server), then the new price would cost $600/yr vs. the old cost of $150/yr, this is close to 5X the price and that is only using 5 of the available 10 slots. If you had a bigger family, or were a geek with a ton of devices (like many here on /.), if you used your "Family Plan" to the fullest potential, and actually had 10 PC's using it, then the new cost would be $1200/yr, which is nearing a 10X increase in cost in that case. Almost an "order of magnitude" increase in cost, which is VERY hard to swallow.

      Plus the home client is going away as well, so some feature that some people use, like peer-to-peer backups is going to cease working and is not supported under the business plan, so it's not just a price increase, it a feature decrease along with it, making it an even harder pill to swallow.

  23. Why to Carbonite? by schklerg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why are they pushing Carbonite? Their page selling the small business product (https://www.crashplan.com/en-us/business/compare/) still points out some of the major failings of Carbonite - which is why I switched a few years ago in the first place. Linux support, my own passphrase for the backup, automatic support for other file types... Small business fits me pretty well still, and the price isn't bad, but I'm still going to look around for something else. The fact that they are pushing a competitor one one side & pointing out their flaws on another smells of larger business problems to me. Bye Code42!

    --
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    1. Re:Why to Carbonite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is the easiest question to answer in this whole thing. Behind the scenes, they were probably sending out feelers to the different companies that provide similar services (probably some mutual friend or OTR CEO talk) and Carbonite gave them the best kickback for conversions and cross-advertizing.

    2. Re:Why to Carbonite? by mfearby · · Score: 1

      I only renewed my subscription a couple of months ago so I'll have to look into something else now... and re-upload everything to someone else. My brother recommends Backblaze. Not sure I'll go with Carbonite given the flaws that have been mentioned here (and on CrashPlan's own web site!)

  24. Re:Hey Crashplan!!! Carbonite does NOT support LIN by erapert · · Score: 1

    What if you got a hosting plan somewhere with a huge drive and just set up a cron job with rsync once a week?

  25. This is not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a horrible thing to do to your customers. Especially for a backup solution.
    They've basically told their clients to fuck off.
    With me, they have a situation where I was a happy customer, they did not need to do anything further for me except to keep taking my money. Now - I can't say I would be inclined to recommend anyone bother with their services, for business or otherwise. Now I have to sort out a new cross-platform offsite backup solution.

  26. I got the email notification today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got the notification today. They had been pushing "for small business" for a while. Then this comes...

    I use it as a 5-person family backup; we each have laptops, plus two desktops and a server. It was great. I used it to recover my wife's MBA that totally died on her.

    I used Mozy, but they got rid of their unlimited plan, so my pricing went through the roof. My Mac user's can use Time Machine, when local, but the kids were able to back up to my local machine while at college with Crashplan.

    I've been looking at other options; iDrive seems interesting, BackBlaze and Carbonite less so.

  27. They will delete all backuped data by snarfs · · Score: 1

    When they terminate my contract, they will delete all my data. I am sure it is in the terms and conditions, but I don't think that they have a way for me to download or transfer my years of backups. Does anyone know how I can download all my data or move them to another provider?

    1. Re: They will delete all backuped data by mprindle · · Score: 1

      I believe they hang on to it for 30 days before purging it.

  28. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is your $100 per year still worth it when the company providing the (LOL) 'service' goes tits up on you, and tells you "we DGAF about your data, get it or don't, not our problem anymore" and you end up having to store it locally anyway? Stop deluding yourself that you're smarter than everyone else, go get an external hard drive, backup all your important crap to that, then go to your bank and get a safety deposit box, which will cost you LESS THAN HALF of what your meme $100/year 'cloud storage' costs. If you're really paranoid about the external failing on you then get TWO of them and backup to BOTH of them and put them BOTH in a safety deposit box. If you want to complain about 'convenience' then get a 1TB USB drive and use that for a 'local' backup copy. Safe as houses! No fire is going to burn up everything in a bank vault. No earthquake is going to bring it all crashing down so hard as to crush all that steel flat, in fact vaults are so reinforced that no earthquake can touch it. No one is going to break in and streal your data. In the long run you pay no more than you would have, and never have to worry about your data disappearing or being breached.

  29. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    is your $100 per year still worth it when the company providing the (LOL) 'service' goes tits up on you, and tells you "we DGAF about your data, get it or don't, not our problem anymore" and you end up having to store it locally anyway?

    Ah, there's the disconnect. I'm already storing it locally. Crashplan is the backup of my backup. Frankly, it would be very annoying to download multiple TB in the event of a hard drive failure. Crashplan could go out of business tomorrow and I still have two copies of the data.

    then go to your bank and get a safety deposit box,

    I have one for important paperwork. I could easily fit a drive in it, but frankly that is a major PITA. Banks are only open when I would otherwise be at work, and I'm simply not disciplined enough to manually run backups. Even if I were, $100 per year is worth not having to do that.

    If you want to complain about 'convenience' then get a 1TB USB drive and use that for a 'local' backup copy.

    I have a basement server that is a backup target for all of my devices. Crashplan is the backup to THAT.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  30. Shitty support by Brockmire · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wouldn't recommend Crash plan for business unless there's an IT person on site. Too many interruptions that a regular office person isn't going to notice. I get emailed updates when the computers don't backup after so many days and need to investigate. Most times, the service needs to be manually restarted and works again for a while. Other times, you need the secret menu to run advanced commands that restart things differently. When I needed to call someone, the hold time was 52 minutes and then was offered a call back. No callback. Another time, I got a callback, but only for someone to take the issue down and someone else was supposed to call me. They never did. On more than one occasion, the server picked for backup shits the bed. I have to contact Crash plan to tell them their server is fucked. After some time, they report it's confirmed and under going maintenance. Wait another day and still not fixed. Contact them again, and says maintenance didn't go well and then did something to use another server. By the end of it, it hadn't backed up in 9 days and took 4 days to resolve after reporting issue. I don't think their stuff is robust and unless you constantly verify, you could be in a situation where you find your backed up data very old.

    1. Re:Shitty support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't recommend Crash plan for business

      I'll confirm this:
      - Java based client. Known issues with client consuming upwards of 1GB of memory. (Although memory is cheap these days this is just ridiuclous)
      - If you have whole drive backup selected it will freezes the entire system by consuming all disk I/O (on an SSD!) when performing the backup. Have backups set to every 15 minutes? Hope you like your system freezing for 5-10 seconds every 15 minutes interrupting whatever you are working on/typing.
      - If you change any of the configuration options in the menu, no matter how insignificant, say a scheduling change for when to do that backup - it has to rescan the entire drive.

      And those are just anecdotal issues from usage on my own. How do I tolerate it? I let it run at night - never during working hours. Works for me - won't work for others who need their last 1-2 hours of work recovered due to "accidental" deletions. I shudder to think what the server-side has to deal with.

      Admittedly its better than most alternatives out there but still has a ways to go if they want to play in the big leagues of enterprise business usage.

  31. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Shrug* okay, you're not putting all your eggs in one basket then. That makes you smarter than the average bear. In your case you can tell these 'Code42' jackoffs to shove it and lose nothing.

  32. Alternative: BuddyBackup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sister and I have been using CrashPlan's offsite backup to backup our drives to each other. In looking for a replacement, I see BuddyBackup as an option. It's free, but it's windows only. Anyone have experience with BuddyBackup?
    http://www.buddybackup.com/

  33. Re:Client replacemnet: Arq Backup by dtougas · · Score: 1

    I recently switched to Arq backup (https://www.arqbackup.com/) and have been very happy with how it works. It is cloud service agnostic, and allows you to backup to your own server as well.

  34. Re: Hey Crashplan!!! Carbonite does NOT support LI by mprindle · · Score: 1

    I'm looking into CloudBerry and using a storage provider like Amazon Glacier. One time purchase of the software plus storage costs.

  35. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Yup, someone else gets my $100, and I'll be thankful that I switched to FIOS :)

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  36. Re:'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    I have mod points I was thinking of using. But I'll just state it here.

    You are being an ass, a giant ignorant ass, who can't see beyond your own little dome. People who are smarter and more experienced than you have their reasons for backing up to the cloud. As one guy showed you, his cloud backup is the backup of his local backup.

    You should learn a lesson here, and just stop posting in this thread. Nothing you have said was worth arguing for on your part, or replying to on our part. We have lost time feeding a troll who wasn't worth the effort.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  37. Who's up for a P2P distributed solution? by mtutty · · Score: 2

    Nearly 15 years ago I built a P2P torrent-style anonymized backup program, based on Reed-Solomon EC. At the time, disk sizes and internet speeds were against it.

    Now, I'm wondering if I should resurrect it. Any interest in a open-source, cross-platform P2P backup program?

    1. Re:Who's up for a P2P distributed solution? by Paco103 · · Score: 1

      Yes! I'd prefer to be able to choose my peers though, so anonymous isn't really an issue. Part of what I loved about crashplan was that I could backup my parents computer, my laptop, and my office computer to my server. If something happened, I don't need to wait hours, days, weeks, etc for the backup to download. I could simply go to the server which i had physical access to, extract the backup files to an external hard drive and re-attach them to the destination machine.

    2. Re:Who's up for a P2P distributed solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wuala was the same way initially, and one of the GPL backup solutions used the same idea. Both failed, possibly also because of disk and data rate limitations at the time. I think you should give it a try.

  38. Re:'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by amxcoder · · Score: 1

    I already have a nice Synology NAS with RAID that I backup all PC's to already. However, if you know anything about backup, the 3-2-1 rule requires an OFFSITE backup copy in case of local disaster, hardware theft or damage. You obviously don't know as much as you wish. I get the cloud is ugly, and I don't rely on it either for most stuff. But as an offsite backup of backups, it the only way to do it in real time. Otherwise, you are swapping HDD's and driving them all over creation, which isn't feasable except on a weekly or monthly timeline. I can't afford to lose a month of data without MAJOR headache.

    With Crashplan, the software used it's data deduplication/compression/versioning information to create local backups to NAS drive on a continual REAL-TIME basis. And at the same time, uploaded all new/modified files in REAL-TIME to the cloud in case the local backup became "unavailable". This is why cloud backup is important.

  39. Re: 'The Cloud' is for SUCKERS by amxcoder · · Score: 1

    I am a freelancer, and thus work from home and run my own programming business. Keeping all current and past/present projects and all data/files associated with them backed up and not lose them forever is part of my responsibility. I very much appreciate files being backed up every couple minutes along with history versioning.

  40. Pro plan seems to cost 10$/device/month? by schweini · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something?
    From what I can see, Crashplan's Pro offering costs 10$/device/month, which is not THAT much more expensive than the personal plan was.

    1. Re:Pro plan seems to cost 10$/device/month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal plan covered multiple devices for a flat $10/mo. Business plan is $10/mo for each device that uploads via installed client UI. So price does indeed skyrocket if you plan on having their client UI on each of those devices.

      Most importantly, they're removing the peer backup option. So it takes out the option of funneling all device backups to a central local store like a NAS, then only paying $10/mo for that one NAS device to upload to their cloud.

      Bottom line is all home plan subscribers are toast.

      Captcha: punitive

    2. Re:Pro plan seems to cost 10$/device/month? by kriston · · Score: 1

      It is much, much more expensive because that cost is per computer. I backup seven computers. That will be $70 per month. That is not good.

      --

      Kriston

    3. Re:Pro plan seems to cost 10$/device/month? by 4pins · · Score: 1

      It is much, much more expensive because that cost is per computer. I backup seven computers. That will be $70 per month. That is not good.

      So it seems to me Crashplan counted on the vast majority of their personal customers having one, maybe two, computers. Which I would have thought reasonable. However their pricing model attracted the computer enthusiasts and they wound up with an average somewhere around 3.5. I am a big believer in having two computers at home and I currently have three and am in the market for a fourth. So about 3.5 seems like a reasonable average to me for enthusiasts, especially given the parent's seven computers. Because of this, their pricing structure is not the good business decision they thought it was.

      --
      I will not mourn that which I never had to lose. - Unknown
  41. They should release the peer-to-peer feature free by kriston · · Score: 1

    They should release the peer-to-peer feature free and possibly open-source that part. It's the thing CrashPlan does best, which is make several easy and automatic duplicates of backups across several machines.

    --

    Kriston

  42. Ripe for Class Action suit by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    I renewed my service days before this announcement and Code42 refused to refund my purchase. Changing the TOS with no notice and no chance to opt out should make Code42 vulnerable to a class action suit.