Slashdot Mirror


We Can't Stop Checking the News Either. Welcome to the New FOMO (wired.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article: Countless studies have shown that social-driven FOMO (fear of missing out) stems from a person's primitive desire to belong to a group, with each snap, tweet, or post a reminder of what separates you from them. This other type of FOMO, the all-news, all-the-time kind, is new enough that nobody has really studied it much, yet of the half-dozen experts in sociology, anthropology, economics, and neurology I spoke to, all quickly recognized what I was describing, and some even admitted to feeling it themselves. "We scroll through our Twitter feeds, not seeking anything specific, just monitoring them so we don't miss out on anything important," says Shyam Sundar, a communications researcher at Pennsylvania State University. This impulse could stem from the chemical hits our brains receive with each news hit, but it could also derive from a primitive behavioral instinct -- surveillance gratification-seeking, or the urge that drove our cave-dwelling ancestors to poke their heads out and check for predators. In times of perceived crisis, our brains cry out for information to help us survive. Maybe this alarm stems from steady hits of @realDonaldTrump. Maybe it's triggered by left-wing Resistance types. Or could it be #FakeNews, ISIS, guns, police violence, or street crime, all propagated through our social media bubbles with headlines that are written specifically to grab our attention? This feels like a processing problem. "One thing we learn about human beings: We're meaning-making machines," Kross says. And social mania may be ideal for mainlining breaking news, but it's not great at providing meaning and context.

111 comments

  1. So...useless people do this, then? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> "We scroll through our Twitter feeds, not seeking anything specific, just monitoring them so we don't miss out on anything important," says Shyam Sundar, a communications researcher

    Seems like multiple levels of fail are in play here.

    1. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this "we". I certainly don't scroll through anything unless I am looking for something specific.

    2. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who is this "we".

      People with friends. So most Slashdotters are not affected.

    3. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem quite the authority on that subject.

    4. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by gnick · · Score: 2

      I certainly don't scroll through anything unless I am looking for something specific.

      FB users often scroll endlessly through their front page. Some content gets repeated eventually. A lot doesn't. Some people can't handle that there might be something at the "end of the page" that they just had to see.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of my friends understand how the Internet works, more or less, and so there is no interest. We just go for drinks instead. /shrug

    6. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have plenty of friends, and we all have something in common. We are not self-absorbed, narcissistic assholes like yourself.

    7. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

      The above is the appropriate response. When most of what you learn from the TV doesn't affect you, and you can't affect it, you might as well have a pint.

      all-news, all-the-time

      That is not what it is. News is, by definition, something novel. It is revelation. It is not re-re-re-re-re-analysis, nor is it replaying the same bloody 10-second video on a loop for 48 hours straight. (Looking at you specifically, CNN, though every single "news" network is guilty of this.)

      There is plenty of news in the world daily. Yet we are treated to a infinitesimal portion of it repeated over and over and discussed to death.

      FOMO is not about consuming the news. It is about trying to sift through tonnes of horseshit to find those few nuggets of actual news that is reported.

      One of the best things I ever did for myself was to give up chasing the tail of the incessant information flow. I can pursue information on those topics that are important to me, and know that the truly massive topics will come to me through others, regardless.

    8. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by antdude · · Score: 1

      What are friends? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FB users often scroll endlessly through their front page. Some content gets repeated eventually. A lot doesn't. Some people can't handle that there might be something at the "end of the page" that they just had to see.

      They also don't seem to understand that not everything will be shown to their contacts. Sometimes your post is not even broadcast, depending on the contents. Facebook gets to decide who sees what.

    10. Re: So...useless people do this, then? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have real life friends. They've all come to grips with my not having a clue about things like movies, television, new music, etc...

      To put it into perspective, I have no idea what Obama's kids names are. I know he has two. I have no idea what is in the theater. I don't know the names of the more recent Trek and Star Wars movies are.

      I kinda suck like that, but my friends are used to it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    11. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Who is this "we".

      People with real life and friends. So most Slashdotters are not affected.

      FTFY

    12. Re: So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's Obama? :-/

    13. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had the need to look at the news in over a decade and I'm on the internet a lot. I figure one of the main points of friends is that they'll let you know if something happens. It's also win-win seeing as they seem to enjoy saying things like, "OMG, have you heard?" Seems to work out pretty well. (To be fair, given this strategy, I'm probably not "most people" or even "most Slashdotters".)

    14. Re:So...useless people do this, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can pursue information on those topics that are important to me, and know that the truly massive topics will come to me through others, regardless.

      so you look for confirmation bias.... that is what selecting the information that you consume breeds - not saying that the news networks in general do it right (a lot of that has to do with the commercialization of journalism) but the purpose of journalism is to expose the consumer of the news to what is happening and not just what they want or want you to hear- that is called propaganda.

  2. I have the opposite by halivar · · Score: 2

    I have a deep, intense fear that I will fail to miss out on the news. This fear is usually validated by the weekly shitstorm on my FB feed. Also, when /. posts "current events" articles.

    1. Re:I have the opposite by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I call that FOBO (Fear of Bumming Out).

    2. Re:I have the opposite by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I once made a comment to a co-worker about Trump's latest idiotic outburst, just assuming she was already aware of it. She had no idea what I was referring to. Then she explained to me that she didn't read any news, and had stopped paying attention to current events decades ago. She said that the result was less stress, and more time to spend on the important things in her life. As far as she could tell there were no negative consequences, since nothing in the news had anything to do with her life.

    3. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ended up going down the same road. I have stopped paying attention to any televised news and I avoid news websites (slashdot isn't news any longer, it doesn't count). I ended up closing my facebook account as well.

      My life has been, so far, much better and I don't have to worry what 'friend' is pasting anti/pro trump rhetoric of the day. Bonus, I don't have to worry about what the talking heads are saying and parsing their biased messages.

      CAPTCHA: peaceful So very true...

    4. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see you have very little to do except but continue dividing people into two groups.

      You're part of the problem that people are trying to escape. DIAF.

    5. Re:I have the opposite by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      FOBO might be it for me. While I spend too much time here, I watch much less news these days. In fact, I pretty much only watch 'the news' when something big is happening.

    6. Re:I have the opposite by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm moving in that direction. I've stopped looking at news sites and mostly stopped listening to news on the radio (other than the 5 min summary on my drive home). I originally had a fear of becoming 'uninformed' on the days current events, but honestly that hasn't happened. I hear enough to keep abreast, but don't dive into the latest outrage de jour and I've never been happier.

    7. Re:I have the opposite by halivar · · Score: 1

      They can't control you if you don't listen.

    8. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had the uninformed concern as well for the first day. Then I realized that most chatter about current events is uninformed and driven by biased media. It didn't bother me after that.

    9. Re:I have the opposite by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 2

      >>Then I realized that most chatter about current events is uninformed

      That's actually a good point.

    10. Re:I have the opposite by eneville · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty good point. Someone with points, please mod up.

    11. Re:I have the opposite by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      I am sure that there were many jews in germany in the 30s who did the same thing as your co-worker. Sometimes you need to know what's going on to be able to make an informed decision. Then again, maybe most people (including myself) can't do that even when they do know what's going on.

    12. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm moving in that direction. I've stopped looking at news sites and mostly stopped listening to news on the radio (other than the 5 min summary on my drive home). I originally had a fear of becoming 'uninformed' on the days current events, but honestly that hasn't happened. I hear enough to keep abreast, but don't dive into the latest outrage de jour and I've never been happier.

      You are right. However, I tend to behave a little differently. I actively seek the news on few traditional, trustful news outlets and science and technology magazines. Once you set up your 'sources' of *real* news, life becomes a breeze.

    13. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's probably a nazi. I hope you're working on getting her fired.

    14. Re:I have the opposite by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty good point.

      I can't see how being accused of being a bifurcationist by an AC for relating a co-worker's comments has anything to do with "good" or "a point",

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    15. Re:I have the opposite by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      since nothing in the news had anything to do with her life.

      Trump has nothing to do with her life? Did she even vote, did she even know about the election or who the candidates were?

      Democracy only works properly if you have an engaged, informed electorate. If you don't, shit like Trump and Brexit happens, and I hate to use the N word but if it gets really bad you end up with 1930s Germany.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #FakeFriend

    17. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump has nothing to do with her life? Did she even vote, did she even know about the election or who the candidates were?

      News about Trump isn't the same as actions Trump or his administration does.

      The typical news about Trump is the crazy shit he says on twitter. It's just gossip with no executive power that would affect individual lives or even the lives of the people at large. Not so different than SJWs raging about things on the Internet when their rage does little to nothing in actually solving the problems they're raging about, really.

      In fact, by not listening to those news about the crazy stuff he says on twitter, you keep your hands clean from giving him and his message any more exposure. Don't enable him. Don't give him a platform.

      Democracy only works properly if you have an engaged, informed electorate

      No, democracy works even if you don't have such perfect people (that's communism you're thinking of). That's the beauty of it. You can have a democracy asking a bunch of kids what they want for dinner: candy or broccoli. The kids are hardly informed or engaged (ask them while they're starring at some screen - tv, phone, video game, etc). A reasonable adult probably won't like the result, but it's still a proper democratic result.

      If you don't, shit like Trump and Brexit happens

      No, shit like Trump and Brexit is democracy working exactly as it should. Democracy makes no guarantees you'll get the outcome you want. Democracy is only the idea of letting everyone - even the poorly informed and disengaged - have a voice.

      And that voice in a majority is telling you that they don't want what you're selling them. It's very easy for you to say it's all because they are uninformed and disengaged, but the honest answer is more complicated than that, and it will take time for you to turn those people around, and to do that you'll have to change your lifestyle and outlook to get there.

    18. Re:I have the opposite by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Trump has nothing to do with her life?

      Correct. Trump has actually done very little, and none of it makes a practical difference in the the lives of most citizens.

      Democracy only works properly if you have an engaged, informed electorate.

      Can you cite any evidence to support this? Is higher voter turnout really associated with "better outcomes" is some objective way? I doubt it.

      you end up with 1930s Germany.

      Voter turnout in the 1933 German election was 96%.

    19. Re:I have the opposite by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Not voter turnout, but the general ignorance of most voters leading to bad outcomes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not voter turnout, but the general ignorance of most voters leading to bad outcomes.

      Most voters aren't ignorant in recent elections. The popular vote was close to 50/50 in both Trump and Brexit.

      You can't claim the one side is full of informed people and the other side full of ignorant hicks. In Brexit, most of the poor and uneducated voted to leave, whereas in the US, Trump voters are on average have higher incomes and are more educated

    21. Re:I have the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss #55071021? The coworker story wasn't called out, it was a step down.

      The insight doesn't work at the "I discuss people" tier; move up one and the "good point" is about people - in general - rustling their own jimmies by inflicting themselves with tribal/us-them thinking.

  3. n. FOMO - A type A fear you will miss frist psot! by ebyrob · · Score: 2

    Seriously though, this is definitely only going to exist in certain circles. I shudder to identify them properly but I see them in the elevator constantly when they can't pull their nose out of their phone between floors.

  4. Re:n. FOMO - A type A fear you will miss frist pso by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Funny

    We used to call these people AOL subscribers.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  5. It's not fear of missing out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fear of not looking while you idiots screw something up. The longer you go unsupervised, the bigger the damage.

    1. Re:It's not fear of missing out by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Well look at that, someone actually hit the nail on its head.
      While I agree most people look at dumb, useless information (someone mentioned facebook main page), there are some who actually extract only information that matters.
      Pick objective local news about what your Mayor's office decides, stuff that affects you now or later in some form. I couldn't care less about that umpteenth Baghdad suicide bomber, nor about this or that celebrity injecting shit into their lips, but I do care about my government passing another rule that gives them more power to invade my private life.
      For example, today in my country the Government proposed some really shitty changes to laws, which allows them to subordinate parts of Justice system. people already gathered to protest and I will also go starting tomorrow. Those who don't monitor such news won't know until the shitstorm hits them, at which point it's going to be too late.

      So yeah, FOMO can be a bad thing... if you're stupid.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  6. Puff, Puff, Pass the Bullshit. by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This impulse could stem from the chemical hits our brains receive with each news hit..."

    Uh, news? That's a laugh. The only thing being passed around these days is bullshit, which the masses obviously love to puff, puff, pass.

    "In times of perceived crisis, our brains cry out for information to help us survive."

    Those of us still armed with brains and common sense are crying, because its become increasingly frustrating to find a needle of useful information in a haystack world full of bullshit.

    1. Re:Puff, Puff, Pass the Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You said it. Its also affecting internet searches. I don't know if its because the search engines are adjusting their algorithms to conform to the masses, more websites with useless information are being made, bad websites are getting better at SEO, or a combination of the three. Either way I'm finding that its becoming harder and harder to get real answers to anything technical or complex anymore on the internet when it was easy.

    2. Re:Puff, Puff, Pass the Bullshit. by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the search engines seem to have got the "cheapest price" responses under control so you don't have to scroll to the third page. for the first meaningful result.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  7. Self organizing primates by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article is stumbling on to something that goes far beyond the latest news cycle. We're a tribal species, and until somewhat recently our survival depended on forming cohesive bonds with like minded individuals. In the past, that was our tribe; we would cleave to the opinion of the group in an effort to ensure our survival.

    Those of you with a sharp eye might notice this leaves little room for independent thought or free will. You aren't wrong.

    In modern times those behaviors still exist, but they're expressed differently. As our communication technology has advanced it has allowed us to form these tribal bonds with people who are otherwise physically distant, but because of the distance we do not get the constant feedback we'd otherwise get from an in-person association. The end result is an almost obsessive need to stalk friends and family online.

    You'll note, danger doesn't really enter into it except as an amorphous "force" driving the need for socialization.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Self organizing primates by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      I didn't get the part about trying to be a part of a group; when they got to the part about information, that made sense. I often hover around people when they have information, and then lose interest when I can't learn anything more by hanging near them.

      Group cohesion has never really driven me. An intense distrust in my own understanding of things has. It's not a good way to make friends--I'm often dismissive of peoples's limited understanding (especially on things like economics) because I recognize a past version of myself that believed the same things and was wrong, and people kind of want you to agree with them and stop thinking.

      One day, someone is going to go Preston Brooks on me for asking a question nobody wanted asked.

    2. Re:Self organizing primates by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Mind you, I'm referring to humanity as a group, not as an individual. Once you see the strings, it's kinda hard to go back to believing in the tooth fairy, as it were.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  8. I don't really have anything to add by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

    I was just dropping by to check for new stories.

  9. I'm an info junkie by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

    Mostly I dig for science and tech news, the bleeding edge of human knowledge and engineering stuff (except I'm looking at the pop science reporting, not the actual research / studies).

    I've learned to put it all aside for most of my day and relax. It's way too easy to waste your time looking for the next bit of interesting information and never find it.

    The truth is that nothing (that I can do anything about) is going to happen on a time scale of days. If I read about something tomorrow even in a week... the delay is not going to affect my life, I'm not actually missing out on anything.

    1. Re:I'm an info junkie by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      North Korea has launched an armada of 300 plus nuclear warheads aimed at the 300 largest urban population centres. You have 2 hours tops to get there.

      I hope you check back on Slashdot in the next 2 hours.

      Oh yeah- and there's a zombie apocalypse just started in Texas. No stopping it. Pick up a chain saw on your way out of town before it's too late.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:I'm an info junkie by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Two hour tops to get where? The population centers? Or North Korea? Also, how would you notice a zombie apocalypse vs any other day in Texas?

    3. Re:I'm an info junkie by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Two hour tops to get where? The population centers? Or North Korea? Also, how would you notice a zombie apocalypse vs any other day in Texas?

      I should specify Get AWAY from there (the population centers).

      A zombie apocalypse in Texas would be marked by Texans acting more similar to human beings than normal.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:I'm an info junkie by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      WWIII isn't something I'd care to survive... but I live far enough away from probable targets that I would likely get to enjoy radiation sickness instead of simply getting vapourized. Yay. But you know what? That kind of news would get to me without having to look for it. You know, when everyone's running around in a panic because it's on every radio station and television channel.

      A zombie apocalypse is not what I'd call likely. And as a Canadian with a well-stocked fridge and a bunch of medieval weapons and some chain mail... I think I'd do OK if the impossible came to pass. Especially since any day now the whole damn country will freeze over and make zombies easy pickings.

    5. Re:I'm an info junkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are nukes headed towards population centers and you are IN those population centers, and the internet has announced it, you are already fucked. Remember how rush hour is bad ? Everyone trying to flee a city at once will be far, far worse.

      May as well ignore it and go to the park for 15 minutes.

    6. Re:I'm an info junkie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep several monitors in command center scanning the globe for information, sifting through the garbage.

      Information is power. There's no such thing as information overload
      .

    7. Re:I'm an info junkie by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I keep several monitors in command center scanning the globe for information, sifting through the garbage.

      Information is power. There's no such thing as information overload .

      Donald? Is that you?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  10. I gave up by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually gave up on watching or checking the news every five minutes when it went from 'These are the important things you must know!' to 'Here's what you should be outraged about today!'. I don't need to be told what I should or shouldn't be angry/disappointed/worried about, I'm a big boy and I'll make up my own mind on that. I just want to be told what's happening in the most neutral way possible, but that's not possible anymore it seems so I gave up. I'll listen to local news for a the highlights, but that's about it.

    1. Re:I gave up by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      IME, "Breaking News!!!one!!" is usually wrong anyway. I hear all sorts of stuff spouted "Is it terror? Was there one shooter or 5? Was it Trump/Obama/Bush's fault?" but few real facts.

      I'm better off turning off the tube for the day and flipping back the next day when things have settled.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:I gave up by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      I kind of miss the days when the newspaper was king. By the time stuff went to print most the initial knee jerk reactions had died down and cooler heads had prevailed. Of course there were other problems with the newspaper monopoly (they literally could control what news you were allowed to see), but this constant 'up to second outrage' has left me burned out and apathetic. Not to mention that there isn't a neutral major news outlet out there anymore.

    3. Re:I gave up by eepok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is exactly how I feel, now. If there's a news article or headline that uses any kind of suggestive emotional descriptor, I turn off.

      "Shameful Statements from the President. Critics Respond." -- Newsflash: "Critics criticize!"
      "Horrific Accident on the Freeway..." -- Yep. Happens literally every single day of the year.
      "Person Stuns Other People" -- I don't care about the emotional responses of other people. Shocked, offended-- doesn't matter. Just tell me what the person did/said.
      "Sad Tale of Person Who Feels Bad Now" -- Ok... but what led to the feels?

      If you just trim it down to the necessary, journalistic info, you find that most of these articles or TV segments should be 20% their presented length. Just tell me what happened! I'll know figure out my own thoughts, opinions, and feelings on the matter!

      I'm not kidding when I say that I would happily pay $30/month for a news service that committed to leaving all that crap out and just reported like the following.

      Headline: "President Does This Action", Body: On , President did this. These countries have acted in support. These countries are filing official protests. Here's the legal/historical basis for this action (link).

      Headline: "Business Hypeman Unveils Design for Thing", Body: On , Business Hypeman revealed the design for a Thing. The thing is not functional yet. Business Hypeman says when released it will do that. Here's the basis for the technology (link).

      Headline: "Law Proposed to Change How This is Done", Body: On , a legislature put forth a bill to make this process standard. Supporters include these guys. Detractors include these guys. Lobbyists involved from these industries have taken sides. Here's the legislation (link) and an analysis from an unbiased source (link).

    4. Re:I gave up by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to think the first person to make a news service like that would make a fortune. Maybe the time isn't quite right yet (too many people still like their biased bubbles), but in another few years I think it will be.

    5. Re:I gave up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid you vastly overestimate the number of people who hate clickbait and outrage bullshit. There's a reason everyone is doing that these days: it sells like crazy.

    6. Re:I gave up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News used to be like that. People don't want it because it's boring and thus companies stop because less viewers = less ad income. Just look at Slashdot. The more informative articles end up with 50 posts and the inflammatory ones end up at 300 with most people not even reading the article. They just read the title, get so enraged, and then have to post what they think.

  11. Re:n. FOMO - A type A fear you will miss frist pso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To be fair, I will pull out my phone and look at the screen to avoid any awkward conversations or pointless boring small talk (like on an elevator or waiting in line).

    It's a great conversation killer/preventer.

  12. Turn off, tune out, chillax by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife & I went camping this past weekend in southern Illinois to view the eclipse. The location where we were at had no service on our phones. No Facebook, no news, etc. I get the same thing in the area where I go hunting. It's actually very refreshing. I highly recommend it.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re: Turn off, tune out, chillax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience too, a week in eastern Oregon with no phone or Internet. Very refreshing!!!

      But I had my ham radio, got a few conversations ;)

  13. I have no opinion by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I wanted to post anyway.

    1. Re:I have no opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to include "please smash that like button, and subscribe if you want more updates about my lack of opinion." ;)

  14. Re:If you don't stop your agresive ads.. by sycodon · · Score: 1

    The irony is I've never seen ads for a spell checker. :-)

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  15. Link to overchoice? by godrik · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much that problem is linked to overchoice ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ), the paralysis some feel when exposed to too many options. Mostly stemming from the fear of not picking the best option we could have.

    We have so many ways to get so much news today, that it becomes impossible to follow all of it. So from all these choices, we have to pick the ones we read, taking the chance of missing out the important news for us.

    Do anyone know if that link was studied?

  16. Every morning by lgordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First thing in the morning, every morning.

    1. Did he start a nuclear war?
    2. Did he resign?
    3. Brush teeth.

    1. Re:Every morning by sinij · · Score: 1

      Unless you woke up due to a bright flash, checking for #1 is irrelevant.

    2. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>First thing in the morning, every morning.

      1. Check /. for NEWS.
      2. Same shit as yesterday.
      3. Go back to bed.

    3. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Did he start a nuclear war?

      You would know already.

      2. Did he resign?

      I know Trump bashing is fashionable, but does anyone seriously think that it would make a big difference if another clown was sitting there? I mean real-world, serious differences, not just the polarization in society that has been going on for a long time before Trump already.

      3. Brush teeth.

      I usually do that after breakfast. i also would do 1 and 2 after breakfast. Why spoil your appetite?

    4. Re:Every morning by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      3. Brush teeth.
      4. Glance out window. "Yellow".

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really. I'd just roll over and go back to sleep. Losing an American city certainly can't affect me if I don't happen to be living in it.

    6. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, all the Trump hatred is unfounded when the next politician in line will be just as useless and dangerous as the previous.

    7. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to waste two steps EVERY day of the year so far.

      Don't you idiots realize what this does to your life ? Has bitching the last year done anything for you ?

      I'll stick to kitesurfing and sleeping around. We all knew Trump would be a bad president, you can just tune out for 3 more years and you'll have the same amount of information you had before.

    8. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if not more so since Pence is diehard religious fundamentalist.

    9. Re:Every morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We all knew Trump would be a bad president, you can just tune out for 3 more years

      You mean 7... :-p

  17. best parent evar by ebyrob · · Score: 1

    I was so wondering where I was supposed to get to too! Evidently nowhere bigger than Detroit, MI with 900,000 some odd people.

    300 missiles: So much heavy water how could we be so blind.

    1. Re:best parent evar by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Given the homicide rate in Detroit, and the accuracy of NK missiles, you might be safer in some of those other cities.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  18. Technology and genocide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    History has shown that with each new era of mass communications there is a new era of genocide that accompanies it. From the printing press to the telegraph to radio to TV to cell phones to the internet... these developments are mirrored by the genocides by Belgium against the Congo, by the United States against the Cherokee, by Turkey against Armenians, by Soviet Russia against the Ukraine & by Germany against Jews, Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge atrocities, Rwanda (which was famously a radio-controlled purge)...

    I'm afraid if I don't keep up with the news I may find out too late that intelligent people in America have been targetted by tweetstorm as the next victims.

    1. Re:Technology and genocide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And somehow, people who are hell bent on defending the glorification of racists and slavers who've committed unspeakable atrocities want us to believe that, somehow, THEY are the victims.

    2. Re:Technology and genocide by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      And somehow, people who are hell bent on defending the glorification of racists and slavers who've committed unspeakable atrocities want us to believe that, somehow, THEY are the victims.

      We've been ignoring them since the Civil war, and suddenly we're all supposed to focus on that? No thank you. Yes, I'm sorry three people died, but that's where it ends because if you think that's more important than what's going on with NK, Afghanistan, the ACA, or the fact that about 20,000 people die every year to gun violence, well your priorities are fucked. The news media is in business to keep you watching, so they play up anything that pulls a heart string, or says Trump in the headline.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  19. I check the news regularly by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mostly in hopes that NK has launched nukes and I can just not bother to go in to work today.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:I check the news regularly by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Mostly in hopes that NK has launched nukes and I can just not bother to go in to work today.

      You're lucky. My boss doesn't accept such excuses.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:I check the news regularly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be over 35

    3. Re:I check the news regularly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be >35yro. -T

  20. Haha what? by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    Checking the news obsessively just leads to a greater obsession with doing same.

    There's nothing wrong with having someone else tell you if there's something important.... And with all these people afraid of missing out there must be tons of people who are aware of the media's particular perspective!

    I used to check Slashdot obsessively but then found myself stuck in a loop of doing just that, and didn't realize how much of it was pure obsession and not actual benefit/fun in any way until I stepped away. And it was actually getting me worked up, I would get too involved in conversations, and too anxious about bad news and everything terrible about the world, without being able to even do anything about it because I was busy refreshing pages.

    Remember pre-internet (or at least pre-AOL and pre-Google)? Life was still fun, maybe more fun...

    1. Re:Haha what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember pre-internet (or at least pre-AOL and pre-Google)? Life was still fun, maybe more fun...

      The Halcyon Days: 1995 - 2001.

      Downhill since then;

    2. Re:Haha what? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      True that.

  21. FOMOphobia by radicimo · · Score: 1

    This phenomenon is real. In order to compensate, I have developed a fear of fear of missing out. Some might call me fomophobic.

    --
    100 REM PISS OFF CODE FASCISTS 200 GOTO 100
  22. Of course FOMO! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    After all YOLO!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  23. FOMO is a myth by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    FOMO is a myth. The world is just too big. True Polymaths can't exist either for the same reason. If you learn to be an expert water surfer then chances are you are not going to be an expert hockey player and even if you are an expert water surfer, when you are surfing waves in one location, there are always going to be great waves you are missing out on somewhere in the world. It doesn't matter how smart you are, how skilled you are, or how much money you have you are constantly missing out on *WAY* more than you are experiencing. You are much better off to figure out what small domain makes you happy and spend your time there than burning out trying to take it all in.

  24. Females prefer well-informed males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a well-known fact that females prefer well-informed males for brief assignations. They may choose males with good jobs and lowered aggression for their long-term child-nearing needs, but for impromptu sexual encounters, they prefer males who keep up with what is happening in the world.
    Only women and the well-informed males are aware of this fact.

    1. Re:Females prefer well-informed males by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Only women and the well-informed males are aware of this fact.

      So, who told you?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Females prefer well-informed males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only women and the well-informed males are aware of this fact.

      So, who told you?

      My well-informed boyfriend told me, lol.

  25. Addicted to news, cured with books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a time, I was constantly checking news updates on various websites. It became a time consuming activity for me.

    I eventually solved the problem by replacing all that activity with reading books. It forced my mind to focus on one thing at a time. I am quite happy to ignore news stories entirely these days.

  26. Self-reliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... person's primitive desire to belong to a group ...

    As a teenager, one is meant to learn self-reliance (avoiding and solving problems) and thus, that other people are selfish, lazy, horny and different. Constant social networking may mean less 'getting to know you' time in meat-space but it also means one doesn't experience the socially inadequate (or the charismatic criminal) making one realize that 'normal' doesn't exist and other people shouldn't automatically be a part of one's personal life.

    ... poke their heads out and check for predators.

    Most of the posts on Facebook and friends don't inform us of life-threatening issues, or even relevant issues. Humans, as pack animals, are people-watchers: We need to meet other people and we need to perv on other people: Social networking allows people to 'meet', and with its click-bait headlines, triggers the basic social desire to perv.

  27. I've overcome it. by dtmancom · · Score: 1

    I finally realized that no mater how much I cared about the world, no matter how angry I got about politics, no matter how much I raged for the environment, there was absolutely nothing to be gained by being plugged in 16 hours a day. Now I check the news maybe once a day, and live the best life I can, only paying attention to those in my immediate sphere of influence.

    Living without the constant anxiety has improved my life immensely, and now I don't add to the stress of those around me by feeding into their own stress cycles.

  28. Missing something "important" on Twitter... by PJ6 · · Score: 2

    *EYEROLL*

    1. Re:Missing something "important" on Twitter... by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      This!

      What has ever come across Twitter that was actually important? Is Charlie Sheen finally WINNING?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Can't Stop Checking by n329619 · · Score: 1

    I came to check news on slashdot. I will be right back in 2min.

  31. Or FOMO is kitsch label for staying informed by retroworks · · Score: 0

    There's an underlying snobbery about the term FOMO. The key question is what are you searching for? The summary describes blindly scanning the feed page for whatever someone else somewhere reported. I suppose there are people who do that. But there must be other people besides me who search for news they are interested in for a reason. I use the "search" box on Twitter every day, looking for news on, say, lithium battery fires. Sure, if I take an interest in a non-research news topic, like Nazis or Trump hate, I will scroll for that as well. But I'm usually bored or procrastinating when I do that. All the comments saying "stop using social media" seem like throwing away your cell phone because you got a spam call. Some folks look for more interesting info than others, I guess.

    --
    Gently reply
  32. What even is a hedonic treadmill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're looking at the problem wrong.

  33. Not interested anymore by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    I will admit that I've been sucked in by the trumpet's manipulations for the past 8 months. At this point the goner in chief no longer matters to me. I've had it with old news, reality TV and politics, all of which means no more donald kardashian, errr trump for me. That also means no more not-so-brightbart and Alex "helpful as herpes" Jones infowhores. My serenity level and available time just increased measurably.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  34. Re:n. FOMO - A type A fear you will miss frist pso by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, I will pull out my phone and look at the screen to avoid any awkward conversations or pointless boring small talk (like on an elevator or waiting in line).

    It's a great conversation killer/preventer.

    sociopath
    sspaTH/Submit
    noun
    a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise