Slashdot Mirror


PayPal Debuts a Credit Card That Offers 2% Cash Back (bloomberg.com)

PayPal is turning to its old nemesis, plastic, to help it expand beyond the digital realm. From a report: The online payments venture is introducing a credit card that offers customers 2 percent cash back on purchases -- one of the industry's highest rebate rates -- with no annual fee. The rewards will appear in users' online wallets and can be spent immediately on additional PayPal purchases or transferred to a bank. The move is part of Chief Executive Officer Dan Schulman's effort to transform PayPal from a payments button on websites into a versatile financial tool for everyday use, even in brick-and-mortar stores. He's forged 24 deals over the past 18 months with technology and financial companies including Apple, Visa and JPMorgan Chase, looking to make PayPal ubiquitous in the lives of its 210 million customers. The company already tested the card with some of them.

88 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by thechemic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With they way they unnecessarily seize the monetary assets of 100s of thousands of their customers, you're going to need the 2% cash back in order to justify your relationship with them.

    --
    Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    1. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      you mean recoup fraud?

    2. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by Mitreya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And they are still not a bank from any regulatory perspective (in US).

    3. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by edtice1559 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although this deserves the +5 (maybe Funny instead of Insightful), the vast majority of people who *pay* with Paypal have a great experience. It's the merchants who choose to accept Paypal that tend to have awful stories of not getting paid. I suspect that part of the reason, though, is that Paypal will accept merchants that Visa/MC would never take on as customers. Although Square seems to have managed to go after a similar market with a much better reputation.

    4. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by Chas · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      Fuck PayPal. Them and the horse they rode in on.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    5. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by quetwo · · Score: 1

      They've been a bank for the last 17 years. The bank traded under the name "x.com", and was recently renamed when Elon purchased the name. They were FDIC insured as a bank until 2015 when they opted out after being spun off from eBay. Most customer accounts were considered "money market" accounts, and weren't insured, which is why they didn't offer any protections a normal bank does. Business accounts could setup a savings deposit which was insured, but they did make it difficult enough to do that most didn't even try (or know they could). They've not accepted direct deposits since they closed their last branch at the eBay Town Center in San Jose in 2015.

    6. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I have a Pentagon Federal Access America checking account and a 1.2% cash-back Power Cash Rewards VISA. Because I have Pentagon Federal Credit Union's high-dividend (relatively-speaking) Access America checking product, their Power Cash Rewards VISA pays me 2% cash-back instead of the standard 1.2% rate.

      Pentagon Federal Credit Union is definitely not PayPal.

      *Overly-verbose statements of products I personally use are not endorsements.

    7. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by thechemic · · Score: 2

      No. I don't mean recoup fraud. Start an eBay business and get it making more than about $4000/month. You'll find very quickly that PayPal will literally seize about 75% of your money and place it in "Reserve" status. You won't have any access to it for 180 days. In addition, they'll continue to freeze a certain percentage of all your income as your company grows. Need your money back to go on vacation: denied. Buying a house: denied. Think you can get your money back by closing your PayPal account: denied, for 180 days.

      PayPal has all the power of a bank without being burdened by any of the regulations as a bank. They act as their own judge, jury, and litigators. They can and will seize your money at will, and their's nothing you can do about it. I know because they're holding $14,000 of mine.

      --
      Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    8. Re: PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      That's because you are higher risk of fraud than a brick and mortar store that's been open for years. I'm sure there's hold back for regular stores, but probably closer to 60 days. They need a better security deposit to reduce the 180 days.

    9. Re:PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      There's reasons why I don't often use Paypal to receive money and never leave money in my account. It would probably be easier to use it more and leave some there, just as it would probably be easier to give Paypal my banking information, but I don't trust them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re: PayPal Seizes Financial Assets by thechemic · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what you're talking about. I was doing business for 17 years straight with zero incidents of fraud, charge-backs or any other issues when they decided to arbitrarily declare me a risk and seize my $14,000. Do a little searching; they're doing this to 10s of thousands of people all day every day.

      Within a few years, cryptocurrencies will make them completely obsolete. Personally, I believe PayPal is seizing assets to bolster their finances on paper for investors.

      --
      Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
  2. PayPal issues Credit Cards by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    PayPal issues credit cards, pays interest on balance... but still isn't (regulated as) a bank (in North America.)

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:PayPal issues Credit Cards by fred6666 · · Score: 2

      from what I understand JP Morgan / Visa issue the card. Paypal just puts its name on it.

    2. Re:PayPal issues Credit Cards by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not quite. From TFA:

      >> PayPal is working with Mastercard Inc. and lender Synchrony Financial, the largest issuer of private-label credit cards, on its offer.

    3. Re:PayPal issues Credit Cards by edjs · · Score: 1

      It's a PayPal-branded MasterCard issued by Synchrony Bank. But yeah, nothing particularly special or different.

    4. Re:PayPal issues Credit Cards by green1 · · Score: 2

      So in other words, Synchrony Financial issues the card. Paypal just puts its name on it.
      So paypal has no need to be a bank for this, many non-bank companies have cards with their name on it without being banks. They're just not the ones who are actually issuing it.

    5. Re:PayPal issues Credit Cards by starless · · Score: 1

      I had really bad experiences with Synchrony administered store card: not taking payment transfer from bank account, then taking payment twice, then not taking following payment.

      I might actually prefer if it really was a paypal administered card!

  3. Do they still randomly confiscate your accounts? by sinij · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do they still randomly confiscate contents of your accounts? I guess since this is a credit card product, now they will also have an ability to max the credit card for you.

  4. US news only by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Too bad this news is US only. I have a Canadian PayPal account and the page to sign up is not accessible.

    1. Re:US news only by green1 · · Score: 2

      Honestly in Canada you have a lot of other options for cash-back credit cards already, and none of them require getting paypal involved.

    2. Re:US news only by green1 · · Score: 1

      Rogers Platinum Mastercard is 1.75% on all domestic purchases, and 4% on any foreign currency transactions, with no annual fee. If you've done any price comparison recently, you'll see that 1.75% of a basket of items bought in Canada is likely to be more than PayPal's 2% of the same basket of items bought in the USA, and if you decide to cross border shop to save the difference, you get 4% instead of 1.75%

      That said, there are other good options. Most of those "category of their choosing" include groceries and gasoline, which to be honest, are probably the things most people use their credit card the most on. Also there are some cards (like Tangerine) where YOU choose the categories for the extra cash back. Also depending on how much you put on your card annually, the ones with a fee may still make sense. For example I have a $99/yr fee on mine to get higher cash back (2% on recurring bill payments, 4% on gas and groceries, and 1% on everything else), but with the amount I spend each year the difference between the lower and higher percentage is way more than the annual fee, so it pays for itself.

    3. Re:US news only by green1 · · Score: 2

      1. Do you want to go direct and pay less.
      2. Do you want to go through a middle man and pay for it in fees.

      Except that number one isn't even an option anywhere. There isn't a single shop that exists in my city that will give me any form of discount for using cash or other low-cost payment methods. As a result I would be a positive idiot not to take advantage of the credit card and at least get the cash back. Yes I agree that they are driving up the prices of everything but as long as the price is the same regardless of which payment method I use I shoyld at least get the benefit from it.

    4. Re:US news only by hord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Credit card companies provide convenience. I never have to worry about having the right amount of cash or dealing with change or stupid cashiers. Not to mention they scale to the internet and other transaction scenarios where cash is inconvenient or impossible. That's worth it to me. I think you'd also be surprised at a retailer's attitude in having a stable, audit-able, and secure transaction platform that doesn't require hiring security forces.

      Merchants also provide convenience. I mean you could just pick your items up on a dock for cheaper. Are you happy paying that middle man? What about the middle man that shipped the goods? Do you buy direct from the manufacturer? Why aren't you harvesting it yourself?

    5. Re:US news only by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      I am Canadian too, but my question is why using your CC for gasoline and groceries? A full tank is ~50$, a grocery cart is ~150$, I only use my debit card. For a bigger purchase, say 500+, I'll use my CC or put it on my home equity line of credit...
      Should I take a 99$ CC like you and start paying everything with my CC and reimburse every month? for a ~2% return? Is it worth the hassle? Especially since they are talking here to let stores charge you 2 or 3% for when you purchase with your CC compared to cash/debit

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:US news only by Cederic · · Score: 2

      But the charge for accepting Mastercard is set by Mastercard, not by the card issuer. So the cost to the merchant for accepting the paypal card or another mastercard card.

      So no price rises as a result of this specific card..

    7. Re:US news only by green1 · · Score: 2

      What hassle? the credit card is exactly the same as debit for ease of use, and significantly more convenient than cash, but the credit card both gives you rewards, and defers your payment by about a month (so you can earn interest on the money in the mean time). There are literally no downsides and only upsides.

      If you use debit instead of credit you're passing up on easy money.

      If stores ever start giving a discount for using a different payment method, I'll re-evaluate what the best payment method is, but until then you'd be a fool not to use a credit card for every single transaction every single time.

    8. Re:US news only by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The downside is if you don't get your payment to them on time every month. I had a stroke once and missed one.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:US news only by green1 · · Score: 1

      Set up automatic payments. Mine Congress out of my bank account automatically every month.

  5. Do the phishers also get 2% back? by enjar · · Score: 2

    Now in addition to needing to reset my PayPal passwords at paypalscam.serv3486.co, I've got emails that tell me to log into paypal.scamhaus.ru so my credit card won't stop working. What's next, PayPal mortgages so I can have my down payment routed to ppmortgageredirectmoneyscam.biz?

    1. Re:Do the phishers also get 2% back? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      Ar you still waiting for that dead Nigerian king's money? And your Russian girlfriend, is she with you yet?

    2. Re:Do the phishers also get 2% back? by enjar · · Score: 4, Funny

      When the son of the deposed king of Nigeria emails you directly, asking for help, you help! His father ran the freaking country! As for the girlfriend, she has been running into one immigration hassle after another, so things keep getting delayed. She's also had to deal with her sick parents and a number of other personal issues. But the money I send is worth a lot more over there, so it goes a lot farther and we should have it all sorted out in a few months when we can get together. It seems crazy that this has been going on for a year already, but we are making do with photos, email, texts and Skype for now. But with all that money I'm making off the Nigerians, it's no big deal to cover these minimal expenses for the woman who is my soul mate, I'm sure!

    3. Re:Do the phishers also get 2% back? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Phishing scams already attack your bank account, credit card, mortgage, tax etc etc. I fail to see how Paypal opening up to a different payment method has any affect on this.

    4. Re:Do the phishers also get 2% back? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Tell the Russian GF that if she does not hurry up you will switch your affections to a gorgeous and fabulously wealthy Nigerian princess who keeps emailing you, consumed with desire. I can put you in touch with one or two.

  6. I don't know by HBI · · Score: 1

    Because I cancelled my account when I became aware of their unethical practices. I don't give businesses second chances. No one else should, either.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:I don't know by stinerman · · Score: 2

      Should I also not give people second chances or just businesses?

    2. Re:I don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to the Citizens United decission, your statement is redundant.

    3. Re: I don't know by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      What's it like living in the 19th century, then? About the only business you can say that about is the old lady that bakes the bread.

  7. Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    In other news, my credit union offered an "eclipse astounding" debt consolidation loan at 8% APR. The 2% back credit card that I have is 24% APR. If I pay the same monthly amount that I paid on the credit card for the debt consolidation loan, I'll be out of debt in three years. Seems like a no brainer.

    1. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by green1 · · Score: 1

      Or you could avoid carrying a balance.

      Credit cards are a horrendous place to keep your debt. But they're a great way to do your shopping. Make sure you pay off the credit card in full every single month. If you also have debt, make sure that's in a low interest bank loan, and never the 2 shall meet.

    2. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Cool story bro, does your credit union also have a near ubiquitous online presence and is effectively transforming it's core business into something else? Maybe you want to head over to Breitbart if Slashdot covering an IT finance story somehow is too slow for you. I hear Trump fucked up something again.

    3. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you need a "debt consolidation" loan, and it'll take you 3 years to pay it off, that's pretty a pretty fucking dumb way to manage your credit.

      The alternative to the debt consolidation loan is to pay off the credit card with savings and have less cash in savings.

      Apparently you didn't learn your lesson from filing bankruptcy a few years ago.

      My 2011 bankruptcy was the result of being out of work and exhausting my savings in 2.5 years. The mistake I made then was hoping that I would get a new job and kept paying my bills on time. If I had stopped paying my bills, I could have cleared bankruptcy with $5,000 in savings instead of the $25 in checking the day after my bankruptcy got finalized.

    4. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      For someone who claims to live within his means, carrying around debt is a big indicator that you're not living within your means.

      Being out of work for eight months after the October 2013 government shutdown really hurt my finances when I still had next to nothing in savings after working seven days a week for two years. I had to take out a loan from my credit union to pay the rent when I got my current job three years ago. I paid off that 24-month loan in 16 months. I could have simply paid off my credit card from savings. But there might be another government shutdown in September if Trump doesn't get his damn wall. Alas, I'm classified as an essential employee and would have to work without a paycheck if the government shuts down. I don't know about you, but I would rather eat while serving my country.

      Seek professional help.

      That's why I got the debt consolidation loan. Instead paying the balance @ 24% APR for 22 years (according to the monthly statement), I can pay off the entire balance @ 8% APR in three years. There's no penalty for paying off the balance early.

    5. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fool. You are going to sink the economy, eliminate your own job and tank every investment you have. Consumer debt is the lifeblood of the American economy.

    6. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The government was only shut down for 16 days in 2013, not eight months, and federal employees received back pay.

      The Fortune 500 corporation that I worked for used the government shutdown as an excuse to lay off 10% of the workforce. The CEO still got a bonus for having a lousy fiscal year. Despite having 60+ job interviews, it still took me eight months to find a new job.

    7. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by green1 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I didn't even speak out against debt. I just suggested keeping debt in a low interest loan instead of on a credit card.

      That said, I maintain zero debt and strongly suggest that others do the same if at all possible (and it is possible for a much larger segment of the population than think it is)

    8. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Because essential government employees, might be furloughed by a shutdown, but they are rarely uncompensated for their work.

      When the federal government gets shut down, one-half of the workforce gets furloughed. The other half are designated essential employees who must report to work and go unpaid during that time. If the government shuts down next month, I still have to report to my station whether I get paid or not.

    9. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you had no savings after two years of backbreaking work [...]

      It took six months of unemployment benefits, savings, a credit card and a bank loan to keep me afloat for eight months.

      So... you've got no savings again after FOUR years [...]

      It took 16 months to pay off the bank loan and 32 months to build up a cash reserve.

      Perhaps it's time to tighten the belt a bit and stop wasting money on your pyramid schemes.

      I had three options for dealing with the credit card debt:

      1) Continue to make regular payments @ 24% APR.
      2) Pay off the credit card with savings and rebuild my cash reserve.
      3) Get a debt consolidation loan @ 8% and leave my cash reserve untouched.

      With Donald Trump threatening to shut down the government over his damn wall, and, being a government employee, option #3 was the most prudent option.

      There's no way that you can carry a debt and make money on your savings - it just doesn't work this way.

      You don't make money on savings. If I wanted to make more money, I would put more money into my brokerage and/or side business. I'm content to reinvest the dividends and profits in each one.

    10. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Have you considered the only common denominator in all the failure you have experienced is you?

      It's called life. When God hands out lemons, you can either suck it down tequila or make lemonade. I've been making lemonade for years now.

    11. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Pay your bill in full every month, automatically (i.e. auto-pay), and you end up paying LESS than those who pay with cash or check, AND it's more convenient.

      Win win win, for me.

      (This new PayPal one isn't interesting, since there's already the DoubleCash card that's 2% back on everything, and many others that give even more than that for various categories..)

    12. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, you're a 47 year old who recently filed for bankruptcy and thinks he'll be in debt until 50?

      I'll be debt free in three years — and the economy will collapse.

    13. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      lol, you're not going to debt free in 3 years. you can't even hold down a job for that long. your career is a cycle of dead-end jobs and extended unemployment.

      I've been at my current job for three years. Contract doesn't expire for another two years.

    14. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You have basically completely reversed the priorities of these items, and so you will certainly achieve financial ruin.

      5) Done. 4) Done. 3) Done. 2) In progress. 1) In progress.

    15. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You would be lucky if God handed you lemons. God has been pissing in your face and you're only trying to convince yourself that its lemonade.

    16. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You have focused on the "fun" things that are of negligible value, while ignoring basic financial common sense that's incredibly important.

      I supposed you could call building businesses and stock portfolios fun. I've done both since I was a teenager.

      How does it feel being completely terrible at literally everything you decide to do, creimer?

      We have different priorities. You want to climb the corporate ladder. I want to own the corporate ladder.

    17. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [....] has little in the way of savings.

      What's the value of my brokerage, business and retirement accounts? I'll wait while you pull an imaginary number out of your ass to low ball.

      Meanwhile, you brag about making $3/day as a "job."

      A revenue stream isn't a job. But thanks for the coffee money!

    18. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So, which is it - are you a moron? Or do you have next to nothing in your brokerage, retirement, and business accounts?

      Why would a credit union give someone a $2,500 loan to the pay the rent when that person had a bankruptcy three years earlier, out of work for eight months and a employment contract that doesn't start in 30 days?

      Why would the same credit union give the same person a second, larger loan three years later to pay off a credit card without closing the credit card account?

      BTW, Neither of these loans are unsecured.

    19. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A shitty studio apartment, a bankruptcy, and a new mountain of debt that you can't get out from under because of your poor planning? Yeah, you're doing a great job.

      That's what any scam artist or ambulance attorney is supposed to see — and then move on to the next target. A person with no assets in his name isn't worth the trouble.

      First: nothing I've said requires or assumes your goal is "climbing the corporate ladder."

      Conventional wisdom says you go to school, get good grades, get a job, get married and have kids, buy a house, work 30 years to build up retirement savings, and, if you're very lucky, you might get to enjoy life. A.K.A., climbing the corporate ladder.

      Unfortunately, I've never had a conventional life. What do unconventional people do? They start businesses and invest in the stock market.

      Second: You don't make anywhere near enough money to be "owning" the corporate ladder.

      If you had paid attention to the "drama" around my comments, you would know that I had limited liability company (elected as a corporation for tax purposes) and shut it down two years later. Why? Because it was in my name.

      Third: The only ladder you have a shot at owning is the stepstool they put in the McDonald's play areas to help little kids climb up onto the monkey bars.

      If interest rates ever go up, I'll have to set up a CD ladder.

      Fourth: Your response is a non-response.

      That's because you're a troll and I'm playing with you.

    20. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The corporate ladder is a bit out of your grasp.

      Depending on which state you file the paperwork, a corporation can be created for as low as a few hundred dollars. The most practical business entity is a limited liability company taxed as a corporation that files its own tax return.

    21. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In other words, you got fired and the government shut down had nothing to do with it

      I don't know about Creimer's particular case, but one of the problems with the shutdown was that a lot of government contractors didn't get paid for quite a long time. If the company didn't have enough liquid cash to keep paying employees, they most likely had to fire some until they got paid the money that they were owed. For companies whose main customer is the government, then that's a possible explanation.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:Must really be a slow news day... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes and when you suddenly need that cash in savings, you won't have it. You'll run up against a wall and need to somehow capitalize.

      I've kept loans because I wanted cash on hand. I cleared a loan (at 6% APR) at the end of last year, and then had a sudden expense that drained my remaining savings and required $3,500 in cash run as a cash advance at 20% APR off a credit card. It wasn't a good financial situation.

      I've been paying about $70/month in interest because I rebuilt my savings account to only $3,000 and then started cutting into the cash advance and another high-balance card. Originally I was at $120/month. I've also had savings up as far as $4,000, but knocked it down to $2,000 recently, and am now sitting at $3,000.

      I have extra money diverted toward my mortgage which, at 2.785%, is drawing around $130/month in interest. I had a car blow an engine in March and elected for a $12,000 Chevy Volt instead of a $6,000 engine for an old Mazda 3--for which I needed cash on hand, and again took a cash advance. I had squeezed my finances as-is because I spent $2,000 plus another $1,000 in driving courses and armor getting a motorcycle the prior month as an alternate form of transportation so I could avoid driving that car as much, in an attempt to delay a large replacement expense; too late there. If it hadn't blown for another month, I'd actually have been in a good financial position.

      I have half a dozen layers of contingencies. One year I put $18,000 into my 401(k) so that I have a loan source with no risk to my credit and a scaling tax risk (you pay taxes plus 10% penalty on the remaining loan balance if you default; the total loss is the 10%). it's sitting at $32,000 now, and I can get $16k out of that in a week. My first line of defense is my emergency fund (cash), followed by credit cards that I keep empty.

      I'd have kept the cards and the pile of cash, too. I'm more-flexible and more-agile that way. Cremier is kind of a raging liberal with a poor grasp of economics, but his grasp of personal finances is superior to yours.

    23. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      For one thing, the bankruptcy court would just tell you "pay off your debs with all the money you have in the bank."

      Except that I didn't have any cash in the bank. The assets that I had in my brokerage, business and retirement accounts fell 50% because of the Great Recession. The value of those assets were significantly less than what I owed and weren't worth the trouble for the trustee to liquidate. All my debts were wiped in Chapter Seven. Once the economy turned around, those assets regained their value.

    24. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you lost 50%, you were in such ridiculously risky investments that you should seek competent professional help from a qualified investment advisor, and stop trying to manage ANY of your investments yourself.

      Funny how a stock index can slide 50% downward when the stock market is down 50% and then slide 50% upward when the stock market is up 50%. People who sold their stocks at the bottom got screwed. Those who didn't are doing fine now.

      So, gg, creimer - you can declare bankruptcy again 8 years after your previous declaration.

      Why? I'll be out of debt in three years, if not sooner.

      Maybe then you can blame Trump and his "damn wall" for that one, rather than your own poor decisions and financial choices.

      My stock portfolio is now concentrated in dividend-paying stocks and the dividends are reinvested to buy more shares. Since so many of my stocks are trading at historic lows, they're largely immune to the ups and downs of the general stock market and whatever tweet fart made by Trump.

    25. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      They lack the discipline to pay off their debts and just continue to spend whenever they're not maxed out.

      Never mind that I paid off my 24-month loan in 16 months.

      Again, you should find some professional guidance, because you're too fucking stupid to understand basic financial practices.

      I doubt I'll be able to turn $6K into $30K again like I did when I bought stocks all the way down in the dot com bust.

    26. Re: Must really be a slow news day... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So you were heavily in debt to buy these stocks?

      Nope. Not sure where you got the idea that I used debt to buy stocks. That's stupid.

  8. Debit by vanyel · · Score: 1

    Been doing that for nearly 20 years with my Paypal debit card. Has the advantage that it sends me email every time it gets used too.

  9. I'm almost interested by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 2

    If you use a 2% card in the long haul, that's likely going to pay for an entire year of your life, just by selecting said form of payment.

    Yes, you can argue about how it gets passed on the stores and thus the consumers till you're blue in the face, but none of the places I shop at offer cash discounts, even though they're allowed to, so it's strictly a disadvantage to not do this.

    Thing is, I'm really unsure about this offering. If it excludes paypal purchases from the 2% back, then it'd seem to make little sense, since you can otherwise just use an existing 2% back card with paypal.

    1. Re:I'm almost interested by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      but none of the places I shop at offer cash discounts, even though they're allowed to, so it's strictly a disadvantage to not do this.

      The *one* place that I've ever seen routinely give cash discounts is gas stations. (What are those? Only luddites who drive gas cars use those..)

      But at least back when I was routinely buying gas, if you INCLUDED the cash back portion, at the cheapest places, it made up the cash discount the vast majority of the time (and was e.g. just as cheap as Arco, which doesn't take credit cards at all).

    2. Re:I'm almost interested by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      That would require physically going into the building and waiting in line and talking to a real human - sometimes twice, as there are places that have had too many drive-offs and require payment in advance, then if you don't use all the money you need change. For what a gas discount would be on gas, I don't consider it worth it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:I'm almost interested by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      The places I used to go to (have an electric car now), you just paid at the pump with the card.

  10. Trust in PayPal? by IMightB · · Score: 1

    I would not trust PayPal for anything important. I have an account with them, but it was only to pay for one thing online, that only accepted paypal. once they started accepting real CC's, I switched to using that. I have not logged into my PP account for years.

  11. skip it. Seriously by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Someday, one of these tech companies will get smart and offer 7-10% interest on a card for those who are good risk.
    And when a good tech company does it, they will make millions off it.
    BUT, paypay is doing the SAME BS as other companies. High interest on all with some treats for the idiots.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:skip it. Seriously by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Credit card industry is already super-competitive. If this was ever going to happen, so marginal bank or Discover card would already be doing it.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:skip it. Seriously by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Someday, one of these tech companies will get smart and offer 7-10% interest on a card for those who are good risk.

      Those of us who are good risk generally pay 0% interest. There is nothing tech savvy about this market.

    3. Re:skip it. Seriously by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Someday, one of these tech companies will get smart and offer 7-10% interest on a card for those who are good risk.

      Those of us who are good risk generally pay 0% interest. There is nothing tech savvy about this market.

      Exactly this. You are a good risk if you do not need to borrow money. If you don't need to borrow money you can pay off your credit card bills in full. Zero interest is paid.

      Anyone who is paying a 10% fee to bankers for everything they buy is already a loser if they need to, and a fool if they don't.

  12. ad by cigawoot · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this was posted correctly? Really looks like an ad.

  13. another by buddyglass · · Score: 3, Informative

    CitiBank has one of these as well. You get 1% at the time of purchase and 1% when you pay down your balance:

    https://www.citi.com/credit-cards/credit-card-details/citi.action?ID=citi-double-cash-credit-card

  14. Re: Do they still randomly confiscate your account by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those of us that have first hand experience with PayPal's bullshit practices don't need to " get a grip ", we KNOW what PayPal does.

    Which is why we refuse to use it.

    One day you'll wake up to an email claiming your accounts have been frozen for ' security reasons ' and you'll begin the game of how to regain access to them.

    Assuming you can. I gave up after two years and just wrote the account off as a loss.

    Absolutely will not give them another dime by any means.

    Utilize their unregulated services at your own peril, but never claim you weren't warned.

  15. CapitalOne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've had a 2% cash back, zero fee credit card from CapitalOne for about 4 years now.

  16. Re: This is fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bigger players can't do this.

    Large merchants pay under 2% plus a couple of cents per transaction. Much of that goes to the merchant's bank / underwriter / payment processor, not the card issuer. The issuer makes their money on interest and annual fees.

    PayPal can do this because they deposit 2% into a PayPal account and gouge 3% from the PayPal merchant when you use it.

    For normal cards to do this, the card issuing bank would need to get at least 3%, which means the merchant would need to pay 5%, which would end up coming out of the customer's pocket.

    So this would be awful if it caught on with other issuers.

  17. Push other Cards to 2% by crow · · Score: 2

    With any luck, this will get enough attention to push other cards to 2% on all purchases. Many will do up to 5% on purchases of selected types (typically gas and restaurants), but are 1% in general. Perhaps this will push them to 2%? I sure hope so!

    Remember, credit cards used to give you nothing. Then there were air miles cards and Discover offered cash, which eventually led to other cards also giving cash. So despite all of them essentially using the same back end (Visa/MasterCard), there's a lot of competition between card issuers, so I'm optimistic.

    1. Re:Push other Cards to 2% by pots · · Score: 1

      My guess: this is a company which has finally gotten around to paying customers for their private data, instead of just taking it and giving nothing in return. Paypal is still not a bank, remember, so they don't have the same limits on data monetization that banks do.

      Another possibility is that they screwing the merchants for the extra money. Discover similarly offers relatively high cash back, but charges merchants higher fees to cover it. Since this is apparently a Mastercard I don't know how that would be implemented, but it seems like another possibility.

  18. Fuck whoever posted this as news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is an ad and it's sad that a mod will have the decency to remove this reply but allow shit like this to make it onto Slashdot.

  19. Cashback - deceptive language. by jandersen · · Score: 1

    This socalled cashback is nothing more than a discount on purchases when you buy stuff, and 2% is $2 in every $100 - when has that ever mattered to a real person? And actually, why would anybody use a credit card in an age where debit cards are available - or am I missing something? I have a debit card with my bank account, and I know from experience that it works in shops and cash machines all over Europe, in the US and in China. I would have to pay an annual or monthly fee for having a credit card at all, and in many cases there is a transaction fee as well; none of which I pay for a debit card. Credit cards are simply an expensive way of getting into debt.

    1. Re:Cashback - deceptive language. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      This socalled cashback is nothing more than a discount on purchases when you buy stuff, and 2% is $2 in every $100 - when has that ever mattered to a real person?

      Matters to a lot of consultants and contractors that travel. But in my experience, you're better off having a point card for something like Hilton Honors because you can get more options out of the points earned rather than cash back.

      And actually, why would anybody use a credit card in an age where debit cards are available

      Each transaction is insured. Debit card transactions aren't, if transactions can't be reversed, you're out of luck, it's gone. If you book certain things like holiday packages and something goes wrong during it, you get a full refund on the holiday, paid by the card issuer, who may choose to dispute the package later with the provider.

      Additionally, the exchange rates on Mastercard and Visa are preferential to what your bank would normally choose as an exchange rate for a debit card (even if you have visa debit card or mastercard debit card - these rates are no longer available).

      Quite often banks like to tack some nasty exchange rate fees for non-local currencies when you use a debit card. Mastercard and Visa also prefer to use the lower exchange rates because they want to generate more transactions and this is one of the ways they do so.

      Through the use of credit cards and paying them off on a regular basis, you can build up your credit rating which in turn allows you to get larger mortgages. If all you do is end up paying the minimum payments per month, your credit rating does not lower from this.

      I would have to pay an annual or monthly fee for having a credit card at all

      That sounds like a charge card, not a credit card. Charge cards work differently.

      Credit cards are simply an expensive way of getting into debt.

      My credit cards cost me nothing on top (unless I choose not to pay them off in full, but I live within my means) and I end up with more rewards and protections using them using others. I don't pay more for using a credit card either in transactions.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Cashback - deceptive language. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I had credit cards with annual fees once. I called up on some cards, and got the fee removed, and the others I cancelled.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  20. Re:My cautionary tale by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Now, contrast that to my Citibank card. I buy a game from g2a.com in Poland. Citibank blocks it as a suspicious charge. I call them, tell them it's cool, 5 minutes later I'm able to make my purchase.

    Sounds annoying. When my card gets checked for fraud, it's either:

    1) 3D verification screen that asks me to enter a code SMSed to me, which doesn't cancel/fail the transaction.
    2) If 3D option isn't available, I receive a text message with a code to send back if I am happy to authorize further attempts at transactions with that vendor.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  21. Re: This is fantastic! by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Gouging 3% of 2% means they're still giving you 1.94% cashback, and that's assuming that you don't just transfer the cashback to your main bank account.

    Their revenue stream will be the increased use of the Paypal lending itself, so hopefully millions of people will take this card and still not use Paypal and put the corrupt fuckers out of business.

  22. I personally don't. by HBI · · Score: 1

    If you have some kind of emotional attachment, perhaps you would.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.