Slashdot Mirror


Amid Crackdown On Torrent Websites, Some Users Move To Google Drive To Distribute Movies and Shows (ndtv.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: As crackdown on torrent sites continues around the world, people who are pirating TV shows and movies are having to get a little more creative. Cloud storage services such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Kim Dotcom's Mega are some of the popular ones that are being used to distribute copyrighted content, according to DMCA takedown requests reviewed by Gadgets 360. Google Drive seems most popular among such users, with nearly five thousand DMCA takedown requests filed by Hollywood studios and other copyright holders just last month. Each DMCA requests had listed a few hundred Google Drive links that the content owners wanted pulled. What's interesting though is that while at times pirates upload full movies to Google Drive or other cloud services, in other cases, these Google Drive links are empty and just have a YouTube video embedded.

84 comments

  1. "Empty"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Google drive video player looks just like the YouTube player, but if you analyze the traffic, it's clearly making requests to different servers than what YouTube uses.

  2. TEH G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the leader of the pirates and paedos you do know.

  3. Entrepreneurial pirates needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    If ever there was a time to start a project with hopes of changing the world, it's right now.

    Corporate empires will rise and fall, but the fortunes of mankind are at a turning point.

    Will the many succumb to the will of the few?

  4. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still tons and tons of active torrent sites with 100k+ active torrents. It's not like were getting pushed back into the underground by the disciplined corporate stormtroopers.

    Hell, we don't even need trackers anymore with magnet links. Can you DMCA text?

    1. Re:Why bother? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Can you DMCA text?

      Yes

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Why bother? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Torrent get you sued, while sharehosters generally don't and when you just stream they might even be completely legal in your jurisdiction. So there is good reason to switch away from torrent when you aren't using a VPN to conceal your identity.

    3. Re:Why bother? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Torrent get you sued, while sharehosters generally don't and when you just stream they might even be completely legal in your jurisdiction.

      Even if not completely legal, downloading does not impose even close to the same penalty as uploading aka "distributing."

      Torrents put you in the distributor camp.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    4. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK nobody anywhere has been legally treated as a distributor merely for seeding a torrent that they didn't upload in the first place.

    5. Re: Why bother? by Thundercat007 · · Score: 1

      How can torrenting "get you sued". Most countries have decided that you are not your IP address. So unless they confiscate your laptop, find the movie, they don't really have a leg to stand on. Especially if you're storage hard drive is encrypted.

  5. Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For like a couple of bucks/month?

    1. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usenet/Newsgroups are completely blocked on TWC (now Spectrum)

    2. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by richrz · · Score: 1

      Damn...so you may need to tack on $5-10 for a VPN subscription too.

    3. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it seems the mafiaa is winning that battle as well. It used to be you could download stuff for a few hours after it's posted before the DMCA takedowns but now the pussy ass pirates don't even post in the clear. The use these stupid crazy obfuscated posts and the saddest part is, they are still taken down by DMCA. So they make the shit impossible for the general public and still lose against the corps. Like I said, pussy ass pirates.

    4. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The media industry has all but won the whole war. They have had entire countries' laws changed without any democratic process, by simply exercising pressure. The internet has been centralized and gentrified. They won. We lost. Time to accept it.

    5. Re: Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day we give up is the day they win.
      Until then we continue.

    6. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit.. so you may as well just stop pirating and buy it at some point.

    7. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were sold in my region, I'd love to buy a copy.

    8. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You are doing something wrong.

      I use usenet/newsgroups and have TWC (now Spectrum) with no issues - fast downloads with the usenet provider I have. I use to use astraweb but just changed due to payment problems but that wasn't related to TWC

    9. Re: Don't people just download via Usenet still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could admire your fighting spirit but we have to be realistic: trying to wrestle back the internet from the claws of Big Money and Big Government is impossible. It's like performing CPR on a rotting corpse. We can give up now and stop wasting time and efforts - and especially stop exposing ourselves to life-altering lawsuits - or we can persevere and waste our days on a lost cause. I have a family, a home and a job, and I'd like to keep them. The internet is lost.

    10. Re:Don't people just download via Usenet still? by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      FUCK I hope that doesn't happen to BrightHouse (now Spectrum).

  6. Why is that interesting? Just tell us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What's interesting though is that while at times pirates upload full movies to Google Drive or other cloud services, in other cases, these Google Drive links are empty and just have a YouTube video embedded." Ok I'll bite, what's so damn interesting about it?

  7. Why pay for that crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just download all of it for free and don't contribute a cent to their wealth. But frankly, even free it's not always worth it so they better start making good stuff. Too many other things to do.

  8. Not New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hardly a new concept, it predates the explosion of torrent usage. There have always been troves of pirated content uploaded to free online file hosts, as it's easier to use than any program. The reason torrents have become the preferred method is largely because file hosts are under no obligation to keep your files indefinitely, so many useful files are lost simply to to age or complaints from copyright holders. This is especially true with pirated content that has fan translations, there are thousands of hours of completed translation work lost because it was hosted solely at megaupload.

  9. Repeal the DMCA. by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 2

    Repeal the DMCA by any means necessary. Whole cloth.

    1. Re: Repeal the DMCA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's one thing that'll never happen short of changing how our government works.

      Just need to find a market solution to fuck over old industry, the only radical power that works in the United States is the kind driven by dollar bills: capitalism.

    2. Re: Repeal the DMCA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can easily get it repealed.
      Just tell Trump that Obama created it and he'll undo it before his morning dump.

    3. Re:Repeal the DMCA. by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Repeal the DMCA by any means necessary. Whole cloth.

      Make Gigabit internet and mac & cheese a right and provide both to every citizen free of charge!!

      I mean, while we are demanding things that will never happen in the US thought I would throw those on the list as well.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re: Repeal the DMCA. by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Never any mod points when they are worthy of being used....

    5. Re: Repeal the DMCA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well truthfully, the RIAA and MPAA as it is known today was really built by mechanisms put in by the clinton administration - sooo you can whisper that in his ear.....

  10. Re:Why is that interesting? Just tell us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The video is Meat Spin.

  11. Torrents have some advantages though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that we are back to "direct downloads", this is far worse than torrents. I remember before BitTorrent, and I had to look for a working game CD for a game I purchased, because the one I had didn't work:

    Try a warez search engine? You wind up having to vote it up three times... then you get shunted to another search engine.

    You find a "DDL" site? Oh cool. Ever wonder why the download is the same size no matter what you search for? That isn't a download with your game or topic in it...

    You find a FTP list. Every fruitcake that the list has gone past, has crossed a site off of it, saying it is too leet for you.

    eDonkey? Great, but because it doesn't do packets at random, so you wind up at 99.9% downloaded... and never will get that last piece.

    At least with bitTorrent, you know what you are getting, and it is relatively hard to poison. You are going to get as clean a download as you are going to find.

    Now we are back to drive stores... same thing as warez sites, except Google and other sites are faster at pulling that stuff off.

    1. Re:Torrents have some advantages though by Falos · · Score: 1

      Centralizing means a lynchpin. Point sources are meant to be supplementary options, DDLs being "convenient" and all. Just don't build a jenga tower atop a Single Point Of Ultimate Failure.

      Decentralization is good practice even outside teh leetwarez distro. Though not viable for all scenarios.

  12. Where there is will they will find a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I don't think this is affecting any media industry that much. If it really was they would take stronger action against any distribution means. Most people feel obligated to pay for what they use, and then you have a percent who we will call freeloaders.

  13. its 2017 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is torrent still a thing? its 2017 for cripes sake.

    1. Re: its 2017 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude get off the internet, it's way older than torrents.

  14. Been done for years. I2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has built in torrent support with the original java router/client app package. HTTP proxy support for both in network and optional outproxy. Has a second source implementation in the form of i2pd that is implemented in C++, helping to verify the in-use protocol conforms to the documented protocol. Even has some methods of dramatically reducing latency at the cost of privacy for people who care more about the former than latter, although you need to talk to the right people and do some voodoo to make it work.

    The fact that more people aren't already using I2P is kind of sad. Other than the lack of a well publicized 'TBB' style project (There is actually an I2P Browser Bundle available, but it hasn't had the formal verification to make sure it doesn't leak identifiable information like TBB has... It was produced by a relatively new member of the community with only rudimentary knowledge of programming, javascript, etc before they started making builds.)

    It is not enough to stop dedicated nation state actors, but it is enough to anonymously disseminate censored or infringing works without leaking your IP address or other personally identifiable information that could be used to pin distribution on you.

    1. Re:Been done for years. I2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason torrent has prevailed over other protocols is because it's fast, if you remove that nobody is going to use it.
      Being linked to from a trusted webpage also matters but magnet links were already usable in the early 00s on other newtworks while they're still wonky 2nd place in bittorrent.

    2. Re:Been done for years. I2P by xvan · · Score: 1

      You can download chunks sequentially.
      If you factor the time required to find a viable DL vs buffering the first 5% of the video, torrents are a more reliable / faster alternative.
      Not being a webapp is what pushed torrent users away.

    3. Re:Been done for years. I2P by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The time required to find a "viable DL" is literally seconds with many kodi plugins. Pelispedia, the site I linked to, is in fact one of the dozens of providers that exodus scrapes.

      You have no idea how nice things have become for the pirates. From a position of ignorance you should have nothing to say.... yet here you are.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  15. Youtube link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with gdrive, you can embed links in urls.

  16. Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the perfect opportunity to move to torrents over darknets such as I2P (but not Tor). This is also the end-state of piracy, unstoppable and untraceable file sharing. It's the last platform switch you'd have to make. The only downside is that it would force media companies to begin an assault on general-purpose computing.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only downside is that it would force media companies to begin an assault on general-purpose computing.

      You say this as if they don't already love locked-down platforms with a heavy coat of DRM sauce.

    2. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say this as if they don't already love locked-down platforms with a heavy coat of DRM sauce.

      You say this as if whatever platforms they love, has the slightest effect on what you can buy.

      It is trivial to buy hardware that you can run whatever software that you want on. You can complain about locked down hardware all all you want, but you never have to buy it. Good hardware is readily available.

    3. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This is the perfect opportunity to move to torrents over darknets such as I2P (but not Tor). This is also the end-state of piracy, unstoppable and untraceable file sharing. It's the last platform switch you'd have to make. The only downside is that it would force media companies to begin an assault on general-purpose computing.

      Not worth the effort. The only place they really bother to try holding back the tide are the torrent websites, once you have the magnet link it's such a giant whack-a-mole. The mass lawsuits have gone nowhere, the "six strikes" policy is just fluff, if you want to be the original seeder maybe you need a VPN but... here's 90 million moles to whack. And that's presumably grossly under-reporting the number of private ways people have shared the file. Even if they managed to prosecute and fine 90,000 of those - unlikely - there's like 0.1% chance of that being you. Even if you get hit with the US statutory minimum of $750 for willful infringement - also unlikely - that's like $0.75 risk-adjusted.

      In most other countries you can only sue for actual damages + costs and most places an IP address is also not good enough to win a case in a multi-person household, guests, tenants etc. it doesn't stick to the subscriber. So far the advice here in Norway to these "blackmail letters" is to simply ignore them. Don't acknowledge them, don't admit to anything, don't pay anything and they will go away. They just hope that at least some people will basically incriminate themselves or pay to make it go away. That said, a lot of people do pay when there's decent online services.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only downside is that it would force media companies to begin an assault on general-purpose computing.

      They've already tried that and lost. The tech companies essentially strung them along and then ultimately ignored them. There's no way that any tech company is going to give up general purpose computing for the MFing entertainment industry, especially not while Donald Trump is in charge. Hollywood supported Hillary Clinton openly and everyone knows how much Donald Trump hates and punishes disloyalty. At least as long as Trump remains in office, Hollywood is screwed and they know it. Maybe that's one good thing to come out of the Trump administration.

    5. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by nnull · · Score: 1

      What for? People now live stream all pirated stuff on Youtube itself! And Twitter and Periscope! It's hilarious! Want to watch that new Game of Thrones episode? Just go on youtube and find the livestream.

    6. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the moment. With appliance computing and locked-down platforms gaining more and more momentum, expect general purpose computers to be pushed out of the market and the restricted by law. Because; "children" and "terrorism".

    7. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIAA/MPAA know about I2P. People have gotten notices from them for illegally sharing copyrighted material since atleast 2005.

    8. Re:Darknet torrenting, hellloooo? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Huh, this seems...impossible? How do the RIAA/MPAA know who to send notices to?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  17. Hold on by willoughby · · Score: 1, Funny

    What crackdown on torrent sites? What did I miss? I got fed up with the neighbors calling to complain about the smell whenever I was watching a Peter Capaldi episode of Doctor Who so I haven't torrented anything in a while.

    1. Re:Hold on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will the neighbors complain about when The Doctor is female?

    2. Re:Hold on by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      The smell? I think you need to consult a urologist....

  18. Reports of it's death are greatly exaggerated by boudie2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They've been saying that bit torrent is on it's last legs since not long after I started to use it in about 2003. But yet it's still going. They apparently didn't know what they were talking about. Happens quite regularly on the internet. Once you see the humor of it, it's quite enjoyable.

    1. Re:Reports of it's death are greatly exaggerated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember the "modem tax" ?

    2. Re:Reports of it's death are greatly exaggerated by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      They've been saying that bit torrent is on it's last legs since not long after I started to use it in about 2003. But yet it's still going. They apparently didn't know what they were talking about. Happens quite regularly on the internet. Once you see the humor of it, it's quite enjoyable.

      Well, traffic on the internet has shown that the biggest user is no longer Bittorrent in the US - it's Netflix. Bittorrent downloads has been displaced for years now (it's still #2). Of course, upload traffic is still Bittorrent, but who knows, in the near future that may be displaced by live streamers.

      It really goes to show that what you really need to do is offer legal alternatives and people will flock to them.

      Torrents are unlikely to die, but they are getting harder - if you have a private torrent site, it's almost pointless to download unless you have a seedbox because you're going to compete with people with 1Gbps+ upload speeds with seedboxes so you can never get a 1:1 ratio required to maintain your account.

      And if you're using public torrent sites, it's up to the variable quality.

      I've given up on private torrent sites - it's too much work and really, when I add up the costs, in the end it'll be cheaper to buy the damn movie in the first place.

    3. Re:Reports of it's death are greatly exaggerated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private torrent sites are extremely easy to keep ratio on without a seedbox, all you need is a always on pc and patience. with enough torrents something is always uploading.

  19. Gaddamn it. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1, Funny

    STFU. Your going to ruin it. Just torrents.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Gaddamn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, seriously. assholes.

  20. Crackdown ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crackdown ? Torrentlife hasn't been any bigger for me than now... I can litterally get EVERYTHING with 1 click. What are they talking about ?

  21. Very risky progression by the *AA organizations by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could be fairly certain movies shared via torrenting were pirated. You could be sure of the same to a lesser extent on YouTube. But movies shared via Google Drive - which is tied in with Google Photos, which automatically backs up all photos and videos shot by Android devices - are going to be predominantly home videos.

    Say 0.1% of DMCA requests on YouTube are overreaching and block a home video because of something like a copyrighted song being heard playing in the background. If YouTube hosts a ratio of 10 home videos per pirated movie, then that means only 1 home video is improperly blocked (false positive) for every 100 pirated movies blocked (true positive). That ratio means the false positives are few and far between relative to the positive impact of the DMCA requests (getting pirated videos pulled).

    But if they start applying those same algorithms to Google Drive, where there are probably 100,000 home videos per pirated movie, suddenly they'll be blocking 100 home videos for each single pirated movie blocked. The false positive rate relative to the true positive rate is now 10,000x higher. The annoyance factor will be that much higher, and they're risking raising the ire of the public, and getting the parts of the DMCA they bought and paid for rolled back by new legislation.

  22. No use... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here are the most effective tools ever made to combat piracy: Steam, Netflix, Crunchyroll, Kickstarter, iTunes, etc etc.
    Get my drift? This battle isn't gonna be won by crackdowns, and it will never be fully won at all. It can only be mitigated by very convenient, cheap, and fair legal systems for content sales and streaming.

    Here's the thing: there's still an unlimited ammount of resources and tech available for pirates to use... the more you try clamping down on whatever tech is available, the more pirates will double down on alternatives.

    There might've been a crackdown on torrent websites, but the category is pretty much alive and well without any signs of change. The so called crackdown didn't leave even a dent on the category as a whole.
    It doesn't really matter if popular torrent websites gets taken down, a whole bunch more will pop up out of nowhere hosted in countries that don't care about nor listen to Hollywood demands.
    And even if MPAA, RIAA, Hollywood studios and whatnot were able to suddently shut down each and every source of torrent files (will never happen), I'm willing to bet that it wouldn't take days before something new pops up. Torrents are not still used because it's the optimal strategy... it's just what people grew used to and I guess convenient to keep running. But if DMCA companies finally have their way and start really coming down too strongly on those, pirates will just... level up their game.
    There files being found on Google Drive are probably not even the surface level of the whole thing... this is just people who don't know better putting files up in places that are easily found. I can't imagine any pirate who knows better putting files up in places known for having an open door policy for law enforcement.

    An encrypted torrenting channel on the dark web. An unified encrypted system going through secure systems for file sharing. Secure messaging or e-mail systems being leveraged to share files.
    Even for Google Drive and other cloud storage websites piracy could work and be left alone right there... it's quite simple: encrypt the files, fragment them and distribute in inconspicuous bits, build a player that consolidate and decrypt files before playing, and it's done.
    This is pretty much what happened in early days of piracy... there were a multitude of file sharing systems, several of them created for legitimate purposes, appropriated by pirates to share copyrighted content.

    If people analyze the trajectory that piracy went through the years, it's pretty incredible. File sharing websites, cloud storage services, primitive chat systems like IRC, the entire evolution of P2P file sharing, e-mail, FTP... every step of the way in matters of file sharing on the Internet had a pirate hand at some point.

    And I have no doubt that somewhere someone must be developing a system that is fully encrypted, untraceable, and de-centralized... if something like that isn't already available. Because there will always be a fundamental need on the Internet for sharing files in a secure and private manner, and whatever form that takes, pirates will eventually be able to appropriate that.

    But this is something known for lots of people since the early days of piracy... even before Napster I guess. The essencial problem with it is that piracy became normalized... as it can mostly be equated to just file sharing if you take the vilification out of the equation. There are entire countries that grew reliant on it for access to entertainment for a huge part of their population, and once it became normalized, where there's a will, there's a way.
    You can't give enough powers to Hollywood and DMCA organizations to go after everyone because that'd be essencially giving them the keys to the entire Internet. And not only people will oppose that, governments and other businesses also will.

    It doesn't matter on what side you are - for or against piracy, I mean. It's an unstoppable driving force, equalizer, phenomena, and culture overall.

    1. Re:No use... by maestroX · · Score: 2

      You could have just said Warez.

    2. Re:No use... by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      > And I have no doubt that somewhere someone must be developing a system that is fully encrypted, untraceable, and de-centralized...

      The story is about cracking down on websites. "Meta-Torrents" can eliminate the need for websites. These are files which contain magnet links and descriptions of torrent files, and are themselves torrented. So, say someone compiles a meta-torrent of popular recent movies. It would be a relatively small file, which can be distributed by multiple means, like email attachments, in addition to torrenting it. Open it up, and click one of the magnet links, and you are good to go.

    3. Re:No use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warez! I remember warez... back when software used to cost money and you couldn't read/edit the code. Ha. Those were the days...

    4. Re:No use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An encrypted torrenting channel on the dark web. An unified encrypted system going through secure systems for file sharing. Secure messaging or e-mail systems being leveraged to share files.
      Even for Google Drive and other cloud storage websites piracy could work and be left alone right there... it's quite simple: encrypt the files, fragment them and distribute in inconspicuous bits, build a player that consolidate and decrypt files before playing, and it's done.
      This is pretty much what happened in early days of piracy...

      What in the encrypted fuck are you torrenting on about? The early days of piracy saw most content "hiding" on usenet. Fucking kills me there isn't a single millennial alive who remembers alt.binaries...

    5. Re:No use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my favorite bands: AC/DC, Van Halen, not Van Hagar, Skynyrd, Def Lep...

    6. Re:No use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember usenet. I also remember hotline, and calling BBS on 9600 baud modems to download doom.wad. usenet was good, but you had to pay = not what pirates want

    7. Re:No use... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Netflix

      Funny story. I used to pirate a lot of anime series. The other day I started watching Steins Gate. It was great. Then on a plane to the Netherlands, open up Steins Gate ... no option for english subtitles.

      They had the series, but for some reason the ability to add english subtitles was beyond them. The .torrent file I ended up with 15min later didn't have these problems.

    8. Re:No use... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Here are the most effective tools ever made to combat piracy: Steam, Netflix, Crunchyroll, Kickstarter, iTunes, etc etc. Get my drift?

      The more of those services there is, and while they still run under regional availability they will never get that far. Until those services are as one stop shop and easy to use and your torrent site of choice they can only do so much.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:No use... by davemchine · · Score: 1

      I think it comes down to price and portability. When the iTunes store priced music appropriately and eliminated copy protection (giving portability) music piracy almost went away. If the same could be done for movies I believe we would see a repeat in that market as well. It makes no sense that I can buy a slightly older hit movie for $5 out of a bin at Shopko and play it anywhere but if I want it from iTunes (limiting where and how I can play it) I'm stuck paying $15 or even $20.

    10. Re:No use... by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      Piracy is easy because you go to a website, click a magnet link and then you watch the movie after it is done cooking.

      Netflix is easy because you go to a website, click a video link and then you watch the movie after it is done buffering.

      Spotify is easy because ...

      DVD or BluRay? I have two options; one is go outside and buy it from a store that actually sells the movie I want, which won't happen, because the movies I want are fresh releases, so stores in my area just won't have them until like... 3 months from now, or alternatively I could order them from Amazon. That's cool. I just have to pay the extra shipping tax and wait 3 days for the package. Which is exactly what I want, when I want to watch the movie right now.

      It is the same rhetoric we've been using the last 20 years: IF YOU WANT TO STOP PIRACY, STOP FORCING US TO BE PIRATES. YOU ARE GIVING US NO ALTERNATIVES THAN TO STEAL YOUR STUPID SHIT, DUMBASSES.

    11. Re:No use... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Seems to me bittorrent could be adapted as a marketplace -- low-cost subscription/purchase (beating even Netflix since this won't need to make profit at the distributor level) and micropayments for anyone who seeds, perhaps based on ratio -- and you've got a huge and instant distribution network that only costs you the trouble of creating a new torrent app and doing an initial seed, and after that takes care of itself... with a much longer tail than normal retail.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. Its only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before Google's thought police finds them and starts policing, then they will move again.

  24. SFTP Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I host a private SFTP and FTPS server for family & friends to access my continuously growing ~10TB collection of Movies, Music, and TV Shows.

    Some of it I own and ripped myself, the rest of it I use RSS feeds to auto-download content from various sources.

    Piracy also is not illegal here, so that's my justification.

    1. Re:SFTP Server by Arab · · Score: 1

      That's nice...

  25. What crackdown? torrentz2.eu, demonoid.pw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still works.

  26. Ketchup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could I also get ketchup on the side with that 10-course meal of a post?

  27. Crackdown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TPB and dozens of other sites are still up and running. Wolf!

  28. most are dead links by luther349 · · Score: 1

    normally by the time the dcma is filed the link has been pulled due to the hi traffic they create once they hit the public.

    1. Re:most are dead links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reddit's r/megalinks has many links that have been up for years.

  29. What about LEGAL torrents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about people who are using torrents to distribute FREE documentaries, software, etc.? Can't have that - it's competition for Sheenywood! (Hollywood.)

    OOhhhh, the poor jews!

  30. It goes even further back... by gosand · · Score: 1

    Before that it was copying 3.5" floppies.
    People had stacks of them, boxes. I remember carrying around a billfold like thing full of floppies. Many of them copies of compilers/programs/games.
    Special hole punchers for making double-sided discs from single sided ones.

    For music it was dubbed cassettes. Cassettes cost $20 to buy, blank ones were cheaper (but still not cheap)
    Movies were VCR tapes that were shitty copies, even some video stores rented them. Recorded in EP of course, so you could put more than one movie on a tape. Why not just rent the real thing and keep it? If you didn't return a video tape you were charged for the full purchase price, which was $70-80.

    The only way they will kill piracy in the masses is to offer things so affordable that people won't bother with it.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  31. Re:fully encrypted, untraceable, and de-centralize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0