Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Price Falls Again On Reports that China is Shutting Down Local Exchanges (cnbc.com)

China's clampdown on cryptocurrencies has reportedly taken a new direction -- to close down local bitcoin exchanges. From a report: Initial reports from Chinese media that the government plans to close down domestic cryptocurrency exchanges have seen the virtual coin shed more than $100 since Friday. Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal also reported Monday that that the country is planning to shut down digital currency exchanges. Bitcoin sunk to a low of $4,241 in late trading in the U.K. Friday, and reached a low of $4,108 on Monday, according to Coindesk data. It climbed to a record high of $5,000 dollars a little over a week ago, and has shot up by nearly 350 percent since the start of the year. The latest reported crackdown follows a decision by Chinese regulators -- including the People's Bank of China (PBOC) -- to ban initial coin offerings (ICOs). ICOs are a means of raising funds by selling off new digital tokens. A crackdown on ICOs would not affect the original cryptocurrency directly, but bitcoin still dropped more than $1,000 over a period of three days. China's latest move to shut down local exchanges would mark a new direction for the country in its efforts to regulate the market.

115 comments

  1. Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by JcMorin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please, someone, verify the math... how did Bitcoin lost more than $1000 and still be above $4000 when the all time high was $5000.

    1. Re: Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      its down to $3908.00

    2. Re: Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      just do the math man. it is not rocket science.

  2. Extreme Volatility by alex67500 · · Score: 1

    I'm suprised nobody has started arbitrating between different BC exchanges. With the current volatility the opportunities are massive. I guess you can't really short-sell but with a minimal investment you could make a mint!

    1. Re:Extreme Volatility by knightghost · · Score: 2

      China subsidizes electricity and hardware for bitcoin processing. Are they trying to take over the global market while minimizing bitcoin's disruption in their own markets? That would follow with their methods for standard currencies.

    2. Re:Extreme Volatility by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Only if those exchanges don't nail you on the buy & sell rates (they do), and then there's the BTC transaction fee to consider. I'm sure that if the difference in rates between exchanges is great enough to turn a profit, this arbitrage is already happening.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Extreme Volatility by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      Who is surprised of this "extreme volatility"? This exponential price hike dwarfs the 2000 tech bubble. How can one expect this kind of growth to go on? It got totally out of control, so someday some big player will want to cash in, and the bubble will bust in panic.

    4. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep that 6% increase so far this year in the Yuan will surely have them taking over the global supply of dollars. WTF are you talking about?

    5. Re:Extreme Volatility by qbast · · Score: 1

      I looked at it, but it did not seem viable.

    6. Re:Extreme Volatility by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      So, you think Bitcoin is like tulips?

      Wrong!!!

      You can put tulips in a vase. (for a few days, anyway).

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    7. Re:Extreme Volatility by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      I'm suprised nobody has started arbitrating between different BC exchanges. With the current volatility the opportunities are massive. I guess you can't really short-sell but with a minimal investment you could make a mint!

      Hard to make a mint when a transaction takes hours to days.

    8. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of dump and pump? China sees BTC as a economic weapon to disrupt the dotcom bubble. If BTC dies what other ramifications does "promised" tech have? Uber in the tank and FaceBook finding dumb ways to grow its already "apexed" business.

      To simply put it ITC is oversold. ITC is very valuable but just not "stupid" valuable and everyone has to get a grip before they blow the whole system up in the same stupidity.

    9. Re:Extreme Volatility by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Point is that bitcoin still needs introduction for a lot of people.
      So the market is far from being saturated.
      The more people get word of bitcoin and develop an interest, and actually buy it, the more it will go up.
      If the price increases another factor 10 or hundred, you need to be a really big player if you want to disrupt the market.
      So, when the market is saturated we'll see a final price, but not a dump.

      Just my 2 cents...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    10. Re:Extreme Volatility by slashrio · · Score: 1

      You can hide your bitcoins (private keys) in a vase...

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    11. Re:Extreme Volatility by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily relevant, if your cash flow is big enough. Remember it's small profits repeated many times. Imagine one exchange will sell you a bitcoin at $5000 and another is still buying at $5100 because it updates slower, you've made 100$ (minus fees).

      But you'd have to invest larger amounts, and you're right, transaction times are quite limiting.

    12. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes exactly only priviledged big traders such as exchanges themselves can make profit from this. Any small buyers that want to exchange cash for bitcoin get screwed by exchanges (note they all sell at different prices. There is no OFFICAL exchange value for bitcoin).

    13. Re:Extreme Volatility by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      bitcoin's disruption in their own markets?

      The only thing I have BitCoin seen reliably disrupt is the wallets of the gullible.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    14. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been pretty good for my wallet.

    15. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were selling pieces of paper with future tulip bulbs to be dug up at the end of the season written on them, not actual tulips. They they were trading physical tulips it couldn't have got as out of hand.

    16. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin and exchanges don't work like this. It's hard enough turning your coins into cash, it's not like using a brokerage

    17. Re:Extreme Volatility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mine too... this wage slave never had it so good. After the last months highs, i paid my credit card off in full by selling some bitcoin. $6k in one hit. Would have taken me the rest of the year and then some to pay that off using just my wages and would have ensured my diet swung between baked beans and 2 minute noodles. So say what you like, but bitcoin saved my ass.

  3. Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sell while they are worth anything at all children...

    1. Re:Tulip bulbs by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      sell while they are worth anything at all children...

      Whereas they could fall in value to be a lot less than they currently are, I don't think they will be as completely worthless as the tulip bulbs. That's not a fair comparison. There will always be transactions that people want to hide from governments. Online, the closest thing to that you have are crypto-currencies. Bit coin will have value to some for the foreseeable future. It may drop a few thousand in value, but it's not going to crash completely. It's used too much for that to happen now.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be transactions that people want to hide from governments.

      Yeah, like ransomware! Bitcoin and all the other cryptocoin fuckers can just die. Stupid assholes.

    3. Re:Tulip bulbs by hey! · · Score: 1

      While I think it's probably stretching the facts to assume Bitcoin will behave exactly analogously, why is it unfair to make the comparison?

      During the Tulip Mania, people actually did use tulip bulbs as a medium of exchange. They were compact, portable carrier of value that unlike, say, a bearer bond or letter of credit, couldn't be forged. If the Tulip Mania happened today, contraband dealers absolutely would be taking payment in bulbs.

      The whole idea of Bitcoin is that there is no central authority that controls it; well if there's no central authority intervening in its valuation the market will send its value on a random walk. That random walk absolutely has one absorbing boundary: if the value of Bitcoin drops enough, people will lose confidence in it. This is unlikely to happen, because by design Bitcoin encourages deflation -- which means that by design it becomes more valuable on average as time goes on.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Tulip bulbs by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      It's becoming clear that BTC are pretty bad for trying to hide your transactions from the government, if they are somewhat keen to find out what you're up to. There are still a lot of regular (online) places that accept BTC payments, mostly because their payment gateways haven't dropped cryptocurrency yet, but you generally pay a bit extra if you use BTC compared to CC, PayPal or online banking. I doubt many people use that option. Then there are countries with high inflation where it's helpful to change your wages into something more stable (traditionally: cash $). But if BTC itself continues to drop, that market will dry up pretty quickly. The price of BTC is driven by demand, and once the tax evaders, online shoppers and people looking for a place to store value get out, BTC may well crash beyond the loss of a few thousand on the exchange rate. Right now, there's also a great many "investors" (speculators) holding BTC, but if the price continues to fall, they'll start selling off accelerating the process.

      It will hold some value for a while, but I'm betting it will disappear eventually. There may be some coins that survive, like the ones from non-fraudulent ICOs (if there is such a thing) that offer a real stake in a company or access to an actually desirable service. But the former will be regulated, entities like the SEC have already said they are looking into ICOs.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Tulip bulbs by nealric · · Score: 1

      Most of the Dutch tulip mania trading was actually in futures contracts rather than physical bulbs.

      As for Bitcoin, the deflationary design doesn't necessarily mean that people won't lose confidence in it. They must first accept that the "currency" has value in the first place. If I told you that I would sell you a "nealric coin" for $1,000 and that there will never be more nealric coins created, I doubt you'd be very interested in it, because nobody places any value in a "currency" that I just made up. Right now, Bitcoin has value mostly as the original and primary blockchain currency. But if another technically superior blockchain currency eventually supersedes it, the inherent difficulties of exchanging bitcoins may lead to people abandoning it, no matter how deflationary it is by design.

    6. Re:Tulip bulbs by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like ransomware! Bitcoin and all the other cryptocoin fuckers can just die. Stupid assholes.

      While I completely agree Bitcoin are just an idiotic concept, so is debt-based currency. Currency lacking a tangible backing is just all around stupid because it is in essence an abstraction for a quantity of Human labor and nothing more. Though at least debt-based currency has a whole host of Labor dedicated to it (not just wallstreet and bankers in general, but people who will stomp your shit in if you counterfeit it as well.)

    7. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's this drop you're talking about? It's $4200 today. If you look at the chart, this is exactly how it goes: there is a peak, some people cash out and it goes down, then flat for a while, then it skyrockets. It's going to be a bit flat for the next three months. It will be over $10,000 a year from now. Ten years from now, crypto will have replaced fiat the same way email replaced fax machines.

      For a site with so many "tech" people, I'm often amazed at just how clueless people are about technology. Crypto is a technologically better form of money. That's why it's growing so fast with only a tiny number of people trading in it. Given its limited supply, what happens to its price when a slightly larger number of people figure it out?

    8. Re:Tulip bulbs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It will be over $10,000 a year from now.

      Wanna bet?

      Ten years from now, crypto will have replaced fiat the same way email replaced fax machines.

      Never mind, I'm sorry, I can't bet with you because you are a crazy person.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Tulip bulbs by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      WIth often long delays in confirmation, pretty steep transaction fees even on basic transfers, having to deal with poorly secured or outright dodge exchanges. A better form of money? Not in its current form its not. Yes even large institutions are looking into blockchain techology, but mostly because they "have to" do so: it's firmly way up there in the hype cycle. Ask them for concrete, practical ideas of what they want to achieve with blockchain if you want a good laugh.

      Both the technology and the coin have some use. And BTC might well sit at $10k next year, but it'll be because of a continued speculation-driven bubble, not because of widespread adoption. Because for the common man there still are no compelling reasons to pay or be paid in cryptocurrency,

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like ransomware! Bitcoin and all the other cryptocoin fuckers can just die. Stupid assholes.

      While I completely agree Bitcoin are just an idiotic concept, so is debt-based currency. Currency lacking a tangible backing is just all around stupid because it is in essence an abstraction for a quantity of Human labor and nothing more. Though at least debt-based currency has a whole host of Labor dedicated to it (not just wallstreet and bankers in general, but people who will stomp your shit in if you counterfeit it as well.)

      So it's stupid because it is exactly what it's designed to be?

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    11. Re:Tulip bulbs by hey! · · Score: 1

      I don't pretend on being able to predict the future; ultimately we're talking about how people feel about Bitcoin, and anything could happen to that. My point is that the design of Bitcoin makes an inflationary crash less likely, not impossible.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:Tulip bulbs by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      A "currencies" with no physical embodiment and are "supported" entirely by people thinking happy thoughts? What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    13. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoins are a lot easier to track than physical fiat money. You mention ransomware... obviously you have no clue that WannaCry attackers only made $50k - and if they cash-out we will know who they are. All they can use bitcoins for are anonymous services - which bitcoin exchanges are not.

    14. Re:Tulip bulbs by kelarius · · Score: 1

      And what, exactly, gives any other physical "money" value other than whatever value we assign to it? If we have a gold backed currency it is no more or less valuable than we believe it to be, same as modern currency.

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    15. Re: Tulip bulbs by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Given what most people use btc for, it's more like poppy bulbs than tulip bulbs. I hear opium holds value pretty well, although you can't store it for as long as you can store a Bitcoin.

    16. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the Venesualens (hyperinflation), Chinese (currency controls), Japanese (-ve intrest rates), US (QE 99+)

    17. Re:Tulip bulbs by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      The fact it's shiny and shiny things are the oldest currency for the oldest profession. Gold has remarkably few uses when you account for how much we have vs how little it takes even for our most advanced technology. it is a physical thing which is a base element with only 1 stable isotope (it can be neither created nor destroyed at any practical energy level,) it is a finite thing which is really difficult to inflate the supply of, and it's relatively easy to confirm the existence of in a sample. Bitcoin on the other hand requires a massive technological infrastructure to support (image shit hit the fan and the economy collapsed, go ahead and assume you have electricity, how long until the last bitcoin-capable computer dies? Maybe 20 years given modern planned obsolescence? How about the shorter term where you have some multi-month division in the internet, not even a fullscale collapse, how long until everyone's blockchain becomes corrupted by double spending? Given the number of hackers using it probably not more than a few days to a week. It excels in being useful for nothing else and thereby not competing with anything for it's finite supply (save perhaps someone trying to create an absolutely massive rainbow table, which is probably the intended use of bitcoin, but that's about it. Moreover it has a serious drawback over cash or gold: it is infinitely traceable. If someone knows who gave them one they can track down every single person who owned it before them, and before you start screaming "muh crypto" just think how cheap it is to beat someone with a wrench, cut off their finger, or scoop out their eyeball with a spoon - all computer security is a joke when it comes to anything more than securing a terminal from someone who happens to be walking down a hall, physical security is the only real security in communications and physical possession is the only real possession when it comes to money.

    18. Re:Tulip bulbs by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      A "currencies" with no physical embodiment and are "supported" entirely by people thinking happy thoughts? What could possibly go wrong?

      You just described the dollar and many other state issued currencies. The only thing that makes the dollar worth anything is that people are willing to exchange it for other things.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    19. Re:Tulip bulbs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      There will always be transactions that people want to hide from governments.

      And that is where blockchain currencies completely fail. Yes, your blockchain can be anonymous - but if it is tied to you, then EVERY SINGLE TRANSACTION in that blockchain is also tied to you. With cash, if they tie one transaction to you - the others are still anonymous. Cryptocurrencies are 100% traceable and indentifiable to a single user; once you know who that user is, you know everything they've ever done with their blockchain.

      Cash is still king for anonymity, as it requires ZERO identification for any transaction and each transaction is completely decoupled for every other transaction. Buy illicit drugs with your blockchain? Make one connection to you, and I now know you purchased Oxycontin 43 times over the last 3 years. Buy with cash? I get you for one purchase - and don't know about the other 42.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re: Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue the opposite.

      There's a value floor for tulips. They're pretty flowers people want to plant.

      There's no such value floor for cryptocurrencies.

    21. Re:Tulip bulbs by kelarius · · Score: 1

      I think there was some misunderstandings here from both of us, I thought you were panning things like the US dollar and not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is trash and a terrible store of value, but I think that has more to do with the rampant speculation than it does with the concept.

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    22. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that makes the dollar worth anything is that people are willing to exchange it for other things.

      Well, and to some extent they think the US government is willing to *defend* the dollar, possibly even militarily.

      I don't think any country is going to go to court or start an invasion over a few entries in an electronic ledger they don't have any interest or control in.

    23. Re:Tulip bulbs by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      There will always be transactions that people want to hide from governments.

      And that is where blockchain currencies completely fail. Yes, your blockchain can be anonymous - but if it is tied to you, then EVERY SINGLE TRANSACTION in that blockchain is also tied to you. With cash,...

      That's why I said that "ONLINE" they are the "CLOSEST THING". Online crypto currency is still more anonymous and less trackable than any other form of payment even if not completely secure.

      You can't pay with cash online.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    24. Re: Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have the poppy bulbs. Atleast I know someone will take them off my hands. And if they don't, I atleast have some drugs.

    25. Re:Tulip bulbs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I can walk into my local grocery store (Albertson's, Von's, Ralph's), plunk down $500 cash and walk out with a prepaid VISA card that can be used online. Zero trace to me - it was a cash purchase. Done. Online Crypto isn't close to anonymous or less trackable - in fact, that's the whole point of blockchain: EVERY transaction is trackable and your entire history is recorded on purpose.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    26. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      faggot detected

    27. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If BTC is so traceable who is 1EnxErtRRpfshfZHCGj2dhVfKqNUvqB6uV?

      What is their IP?

      What is their name?

      What country do they live in?

      You can see that they recently sent some fractions of a BTC to 1A29RXk4xBUa18WuTHdSyqF26jWoSr3Guu, 1KNoKefNi6xJxCKDpKf1ufznZNnxHLsxvD and 16QFwUA1YgPg7ABKmsMpMyomkGweon2eXV.

      Who is 1A29RXk4xBUa18WuTHdSyqF26jWoSr3Guu?
      Who is 1KNoKefNi6xJxCKDpKf1ufznZNnxHLsxvD?
      Who is 16QFwUA1YgPg7ABKmsMpMyomkGweon2eXV?

    28. Re:Tulip bulbs by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      WIth often long delays in confirmation ...

      Compared to what? Typical credit card charges can be reversed for months afterward. With cryptocurrency the time to settle might be a significant fraction of an hour but when it's done, the cost was a tiny fraction of the transaction and the "money" is 100% really really transferred, this removal of trillions of dollars of economic drag on the economy in the form of fees to "trusted 3rd parties" is another huge potential benefit of such digital currencies.

    29. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do love the assumption that the numerical "value" of bitcoins in any way connects to its usage as a currency.

      Most people value the fact that their currency buys roughly the same amount of things on a day-by-day basis, rather than wild fluctuations that can see it lose or gain 10-20% of its value every day. Weirdly people don't use crazy speculative investments as a daily currency because they're totally useless for general life - ignoring the massive technical problems of actually using bitcoin as a currency on a daily basis (for the average user, who is certainly not the average tech user).

      Also, most people with a brain understand why deflationary currencies aren't good.

    30. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet again bitcoiners delude themselves into thinking chargebacks are a bad thing that is an evil that the world hates and wants to be rid of.

      In the real world, people like the ability to get their money back if scammed, and for there to be controls on businesses and other parties. Bitcoiners are again mistaking their own libertarian delusions for problems people actually have.

      And lol at using fees as an argument against the traditional monetary system, considering how the fee system is working out for bitcoin (with only one trajectory in sight).

    31. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you can make multiple addresses in most wallets. And I'm sure some do, that are doing nefarious things.

    32. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be transactions that people want to hide from governments.

      Yeah, like ransomware! Bitcoin and all the other cryptocoin fuckers can just die. Stupid assholes.

      Yes, some people want to hide from governments so they can do bad things. But most of the economic activity looking to hide with crypto is fundamentally good, whether it be illegal gambling, drug trade, or tax evasion. Crypto is freeing people and simultaneously helping to defund the greatest terrorist organisations on the planet: the governments.

    33. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WIth often long delays in confirmation ...

      Compared to what? Typical credit card charges can be reversed for months afterward. With cryptocurrency the time to settle might be a significant fraction of an hour but when it's done, the cost was a tiny fraction of the transaction and the "money" is 100% really really transferred, this removal of trillions of dollars of economic drag on the economy in the form of fees to "trusted 3rd parties" is another huge potential benefit of such digital currencies.

      Firstly, transactions are never "100% really really transferred". There's always the possibility of a rival chain with more work appearing, it's just that this possibility becomes exponentially more remote with time.

      Secondly, I'd say you don't even need to wait a "significant fraction of an hour" to beat credit cards. The proportion of 2-second-old, reasonable-looking, 0-confirmation transactions which ultimately fail is much smaller than the number of confirmed credit card payments which are ultimately reversed.

    34. Re:Tulip bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be transactions that people want to hide from governments.

      And that is where blockchain currencies completely fail. Yes, your blockchain can be anonymous - but if it is tied to you, then EVERY SINGLE TRANSACTION in that blockchain is also tied to you. With cash,...

      That's why I said that "ONLINE" they are the "CLOSEST THING". Online crypto currency is still more anonymous and less trackable than any other form of payment even if not completely secure.

      You can't pay with cash online.

      Actually, I'd argue one cryptocurrency, Zcash, technically beats cash in this metric. Cash has one significant weakness in that each bill has a unique serial number. Zcash has privacy weaknesses too but they are each far less severe than this.

  4. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the $5k was like 2 weeks ago. Then it dropped to $4000, came back up to $4500, dropped again. It seesaws back and forth. The whole "$100 drop" is a complete non-issue in the grand scheme of things when this "currency" regularly goes up or down $200 in a day for seemingly no reason, and drops $500 in a day when something newsworthy actually happens.

  5. up 120% since july as of today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    room to slow for sure... cease fire stand down.. deleting the crown royal psycho wmd on credit cabals should upend our digits anyway? that's the spirit.. sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-kA3UtBj4M .. hanging on to our hemispheres.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvhgVxNCP1c ... spiritless greed/fear/ego based digitarians at odds with all of creation now?

  6. Stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin price is at a three week low!

  7. Insider trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Chinese officials manipulating Bitcoin's exchange rate nigh before binge-buying as much as they can with their huge dollar reserves (at the same time dumping some of that).

    At the same time, as someone said here, they're mining like crazy (every graphics card needs a burn-in test, right?)

    Muhahaha...

  8. Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, it did drop to below $4100, but it has now rebounded to nearly $4300. Yes it's dropped some compared to Friday, but it's about where it was last Tuesday. Whaddayaknow, it goes up, and it goes down. Look at the 30 day chart, and the trend looks like a fairly steady rise from about $4000 to $4250. Much as journalists would like the story to be "Oh noes, the bitcoin is crashing!", it doesn't really stack up (yet).

    Of course, reaching a peak value at a "significant" number like $5000 is a signal for a lot of people to sell, which drives down prices, and the real surprise is that that combined with the Chinese drama hasn't had an even more dramatic effect, but all it seems to have done is drive a relatively small correction in value back down to the underlying trend.

  9. Looking at it wrong... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    I think the drop is people over-thinking it. With no local exchanged, that just means people in China have more incentive to keep transactions on bitcoin, and not pull out to local currency. I suspect it will result in more demand and therefore higher prices.

    I also suspect that with the volatility, there will be a bitcoin futures market at some point.

    1. Re:Looking at it wrong... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      "I also suspect that with the volatility, there will be a bitcoin futures market at some point."

      Stocks are like betting on a horse race with no finish line. Bitcoin is like betting on a horse race with no finish line and no horses.

    2. Re:Looking at it wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I also suspect that with the volatility, there will be a bitcoin futures market at some point."

      Stocks are like betting on a horse race with no finish line. Bitcoin is like betting on a horse race with no finish line and no horses.

      So it's like PayPal then? PayPal funds have no intrinsic value until I convert it into a local currency or give it to someone else who thinks it's worth whatever they're trading me for. They can then exchange it for their local currency, but it still has no value until then. PayPal can also take it back whenever they want, for whatever reason they want and there's not a whole hell of a lot you can do. Credit and debit cards are ubiquitous in most of the world so there's and yet PayPal is still very successful even though having any money in PayPal makes that money only worth what PayPal says it is as determined by their fees and exchange rates. With BTC, it's the same thing except everyone collectively controls what it's worth.

    3. Re: Looking at it wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is truly sad how idiotic the typical Slashdot reader is with regards to the coming paradigm shift to digital currency. While nobody is sure of the timeframe there is no doubt the world's money will someday be largely digitized. It may not be Bitcoin. Maybe it will be Ethereum. Who knows. But to say there is no "horse" in this race is so shortsighted that I find it humorous people like you even bother coming to a news site for nerds. You simply do not make sense being here at all.

    4. Re:Looking at it wrong... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      "So it's like PayPal then?"

      No.

      - PayPal can only perform a heist once, then their reputation is destroyed.
      - The net worth of Paypal is more than it would be worth destroying their own brand
      - The number of people required to collude in a heist of Paypal and their lack of assurance of a payout makes a heist very difficult
      - People don't speculate on the value of Paypal dollars

      My point about stocks vs Bitcoin is that although stocks have a dubious valuation, there's some rough consensus on what "fundamental" values might be. With bitcoin, you need to speculate on which market forces might even be affecting the valuation.

    5. Re: Looking at it wrong... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      "...coming paradigm shift to digital currency..."

      Check the top of the graph.

      http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/6918834286_483518f635_b.jpg

    6. Re: Looking at it wrong... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Not sure why "Banzai7 Institute" is plagiarizing that image -- and changing the section labels: "Smart Money" to "Wall Street and 0.01 percenters"

      Original source article of the image

      Bubble cycle-- Momentum, delusion, despair, hope, recovery By Neil Behrmann
      * http://marketpredict.com/articles/mp-bubblecycle.htm

      It is available on wikimedia
      * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stages_of_a_bubble.png

    7. Re:Looking at it wrong... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      - PayPal can only perform a heist once, then their reputation is destroyed.

      Yet they seem to have done it a lot. There are even websites. www.paypalsucks.com And they are NOT new...

      - The net worth of Paypal is more than it would be worth destroying their own brand

      Apparently not, since their brand is already destroyed, and it doesn't seem to be a problem.

      - The number of people required to collude in a heist of Paypal and their lack of assurance of a payout makes a heist very difficult

      Not really. Lots of people scam paypal, and paypal scams lots of other people.

  10. Bitcoin is dead. SELL SELL SELL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hurray bitcoin is dead once and for all. Thank you China!!

  11. Bitcoin should be north of $10k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a buyer at these fire sale prices.

  12. As my old man would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... You can shit on some of the people some of the time, you can shit on some of the people all of the time and you can shit on all of the people some of the time but you can never shit on all the people all of the time. So you should settle on shitting on most of the people most of the time, so that you can never run out of time or shit. Wise words indeed. And the we would take turns shitting on my little brothers.

    1. Re:As my old man would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your input, but we were talking about China SHUTTING down stuff.

  13. Subsidies and solar power energy storage. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    China subsidizes electricity and hardware for bitcoin processing.

    Ha. well that will be another interesting aspect of bitcoin--- it will arbitrage electric power subsidies out of existence.

    Please correct me if I'm wrong because I might be but my educated guess about bitcoin is that there's no price bubble at all. My reason for stating this rests on the assumption that the price of mining a coin is exactly equal to the electricity and hardware costs plus a thin markup (thin-ness dictated by competition which is intense). By price here I mean the cost of buying a coin plus the pre-rated cost of a typical shared transaction fee on the coin for using it. (that is to say, the amount of money the miner gets).

    So if that's right then the typical cost of mining a coin is about $4000.

    Am I right?

    Now lets drill down on this a little. The cost of mining is not identical for all miners.
      imagine a histogram of miners with the X-axis being their cost of mining, removing the hardware cost from the cost of mining (a sunk cost) and just look at the marginal cost of electicity. this is different for different miners.

      If you then you draw a vertical line at the current price then the area to the left is miners who are making money. The ones to the right are miners who either are not mining (because they lose money) or who mining because even though it's a loss they can get some cash flow to pay off debts,

    You can draw a second histogram which includes the cost of the hardware. In this case the ones to the left are all the people who could profit by entering the mining industry and the ones to the right are the ones who should not purchase hardware because it would be a loss from the start.

    One of the factors not included here is the re-sale cost of used hardware. That's a tricky thing to estimate since the future price and difficulty of mining are not known when you initially buy the hardware.

    What determines the cost of electricity? Well if you can use the waste heat then the cost is free. And if your country subsidises electrictiy then for you, not your country, it's also cheap. And if you have electricity that would go to waste otherwise then it's also free.

    What electricity goes to waste? Well renewables that need to be stored in batteries for one. instead of storing it in a battery just use it to mine. They buy back the power later when you need it. Much cheaper than buying batteries.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Subsidies and solar power energy storage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a complete idiot.

    2. Re:Subsidies and solar power energy storage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent rebuttal to his points.

    3. Re:Subsidies and solar power energy storage. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You have identified a strength of Bitcoin, which is that the algorithm that limits its money supply also sets a maximum value at any given time, based on the cost of mining new coins. If there are a significant number of miners who can still profit at a market price of $4000, they will keep on mining. But at the same time, speculative trading in the outstanding supply of BTC can take place at any price level, and is not less frothy and speculative just because there can still be new mining.

      All of the economy-wrecking speculative action in Enron shares happened at a time when no new shares were being created.

    4. Re:Subsidies and solar power energy storage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the algorithm adjusts the difficulty to maintain a constant increase in supply of btc, so there is no upper limit to the price. the harder people try to mine, the more mining has to be done to find a block.

  14. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by millette · · Score: 1

    Well, it sank to $3940 during the 4th but finished the day a little over $4000, then reached $4600 over the next few days before falling to $4100 yesterday. Don't blink. So somewhere in there it lost $1000 although it gained half of it back along the way.

  15. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin was never at 5000. It was some after-market article by dumbass "reporters" where the ASKING price was 5000 on some low-volume exchange(s). I don't think any trades actually happened at that price and the normal actual real trading prices at the time were in the $4300 range.

  16. That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It went down 200$ on the day my cat Bobby Coin died.

  17. Miner miner forty-niner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares. 1849.

  18. Re: Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sold some at 5006. But high was 5015.

  19. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no math to be concerned about with this fake money. I have a bunch of dirt in my back yard. It's special, it's different than your dirt and more valuable because I say so. I'm selling it for $1000/grain of dirt. Please contact me if you would like to invest in this new currency because once it's sold out it's gone there will be nothing left and your grains will only increase in value. That is unless my neighbors start making their own dirt exchanges and selling it, then I guess the value of my dirt will turn to shit.

    Anyone and everyone "investing" in any type of digital (fake, nonexistent, not linked to anything tangible) currency is just plain fucking stupid. At least dirt is real. Bitcoin is just 1s and 0s and linked to nothing of value.

  20. There is plenty of arbitrage. Fees, delays limit by raymorris · · Score: 1

    There are many people who do Bitcoin arbitrage. Software for doing so is readily available. Exchange fees and the time required to settle transactions limit the profitability and increase the risk. You don't know for sure if your transaction will settle until days later. Recently, there were 200,000 transactions awaiting settlement.

    There is also risk from exchange issues, and not just frauds and hacks. An FDIC-insured bank has to prove it has sufficient assets to cover liabilities, both liquid and long term. With no such regulation of Bitcoin exchanges, it's natural for exchanges to try to increase profits by pushing the limits on liabilities vs actual cash available. An honest but eager exchange owner can easily accidentally create a situation in which they aren't able to make promised pay outs.

  21. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

    "Anyone and everyone "investing" in any type of digital (fake, nonexistent, not linked to anything tangible) currency is just plain fucking stupid. At least dirt is real. Bitcoin is just 1s and 0s and linked to nothing of value."

    Odd that my ROI with this fake money was 10 fold in real $$. Also, you do realise that all fiat currency isn't based on anything tangible. While US$ used to be based on gold, that hasn't been the case for decades. That dollar in your wallet is only worth the value that society gives it.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  22. Yep, Myspace ruled social networking by raymorris · · Score: 1

    >Bitcoin has value mostly as the original and primary blockchain currency.

    Indeed. Even if one were to assume that crypto-currency would be around forever, that doesn't imply the same for Bitcoin. Bitcoin's value, compared to other crypto-currency, is basically because it's popular. In a way, it's popular because it's popular. Much like the leading social network. Plenty of sites offer features similar to Facebook, but people use Facebook because that's what their friends use. Everybody is on Facebook because everybody is on Facebook. But many of us remember when Myspace was the one everybody used. Just because Myspace was dominant didn't mean it would remain dominant, or even relevant. It was replaced by Facebook, and the fall of Myspace was pretty rapid. Similarly, Bitcoin could be replaced by Facecoin at any time.

  23. Double its value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even with this small drop, Bitcoin is still at about twice the value it was two months ago. This drop is a tiny blip on the radar in the context of its growth in recent months. this would be like writing a story about someone's heart stopping because their pulse lowered from 105 to 100 beats-per-minute.

  24. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by alexborges · · Score: 1

    From this perspective, all money except precious metal is fake.

    --
    NO SIG
  25. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by alexborges · · Score: 1

    All cash is "fake, nonexistent, not linked to anything tangible".

    --
    NO SIG
  26. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Please, someone, verify the math... how did Bitcoin lost more than $1000 and still be above $4000 when the all time high was $5000.

    By asking that question you have shown you clearly don't have what it takes to be an investment banker.

  27. Another VR sort of business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another VR sort of business model. Nothing really tangible to back up its incredibly inflated value which only means short traders are benefiting and when their done so will Bitcoin.

  28. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    The thing of value isn't the coins, it's the blockchain and the processes around it. Other blockchains have been built but the stability of one that's deeply rooted like the Bitcoin BC is valuable. No saying BC is "worth" what it's going for, but it's not backed by nothing either.

  29. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It works like this...

    Say I have 5000 tulips, and I lose over 1000 tulips, then I would have at least 4100 tulips.

  30. More to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is just the first, more will come.

    Stay AWAY from ALL Crypto currencies; they only serve to enslave you to a central bank, and many of us will never buy nor sell nor accept Crypto currencies for any reason.

    Any corporation or government entity attempting to force Crypto currencies on people will be viewed by many as an enemy of freedom and will likely come under some sort of military attack.

    I hope people will remain civilized, but history has shown it doesn't usually happen that way.

  31. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In major currencies, cash is linked to gold held by the central bank (e.g. Bank of England) or similar.

    In that sense, cash is really a promissory note of future settlement, exchangeable for gold. If gold is tangible, then cash is linked to something tangible.

    Bitcoin, on the other hand, is not. It's just linked to a server somewhere, run
    by a bunch of ransoms.

  32. Bloomberg has info on this by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Basically, after some of us pointed out that the bitcoin exchanges were enabling Russia and North Korea to delay climate change action, and China had decided to force all new vehicles to become electric, they had to do something.

    You can still exchange bitcoin legally, but only in person.

    Consequences are like that. China does what it's going to do.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Troed · · Score: 1

    In major currencies, cash is linked to gold held by the central bank (e.g. Bank of England) or similar.

    That depends. Which year do you believe it is currently?

  34. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Price changes like this are not what you want in a medium of exchange, but they are exactly what you want in a pump-and-dump stock.

  35. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gold standard fools are a hoot. No wonder you like bitcoin.

  36. Bitcoin roller coaster. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    how did Bitcoin lost more than $1000 and still be above $4000 when the all time high was $5000.

    Bitcoin is so unstable and changes so fast, that by the time you finish your subtraction the numbers doesn't mean anything anymore.

    And I'm only half joking.

    Seriouly, do we *Really* need a new /. article each time the exchange value of BTC jolts ?
    At that pace we could actually use the exchange rate as an entropy source for random number generators.

    Stick to the bitcoin *protocol* as a way to make decentralized transactions only, and keep using *fiat* for your long-term storage needs.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  37. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Currency is useful as a means of decoupling barter from direct person-to-person exchange. I don't have to go to a dairy farmer, a butcher, a corn farmer, a winery, and the newspaper printer - I can go to the local Von's and buy everything there. I give them paper to procure goods; they give some of that paper to others for goods, and so on. Currency is great because it's universally accepted at a recognized value.

    Bitcoin? Where the price can bump 20% in a matter of a few days (and plunge by that too) is terrible, because that same dairy farmer couldn't quote a price and be relatively certain the quote can last for more than a few hours. Stability is crucial - and having a currency that is recognized by Governments as legal tender (meaning - it can be legally used to pay off debts and contracts) is crucial. Bitcoin is neither stable nor legal tender. Meaning - great for speculation, but pretty poor for basing an economy upon.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  38. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Stability of Bitcoin? I can't see where it was stable...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  39. Re: Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't believe you, you need more people - jay z

  40. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    Stability of the blockchain ledger that underpins bitcoin. It's a well established blockchain with a large number of resources devoted to running the consensus algorithm, and thus more difficult to subvert than a freshly minted blockchain. That has utility and utility is value.

  41. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gold is just "special dirt"

  42. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currency is really just IOU's written on little pieces of paper most of which are printed with a fancy font by governments. they may or may not be backed by something tangible like gold, that part really isn't important. what is important is whether the person you want to barter with recognizes it and is willing to exchange their own goods or services for it.

    Gold has not inherent value either, it only has value because other people think it does much like any other currency and are willing to trade their own goods or services for it.

  43. Of course the value of BTC just dropped! by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    I purchased my first Bitcoins about a week ago, and I'm known to have that kind of effect.

    I can also stop a cashier lineup just by standing in it.

  44. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    They're not stupid. They're rich. They're simply leeches, draining money out of the economy while contributing no productivity whatsoever, not even as much use as the banking and stock leeches (who at least supply money to productive people).

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  45. Bubble by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    China bubble will pop soon.

  46. Re: Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a long time ago cash was linked to gold..

  47. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not stupid. They're rich. They're simply leeches, draining money out of the economy while contributing no productivity whatsoever, not even as much use as the banking and stock leeches (who at least supply money to productive people).

    How are cryptocurrency investors "draining money out of the economy"? If anything, they're taking their economic activity away from the fiat money system, leaving more dollars for everyone else.

    They're not sucking blood out of the system; they're just done with propping it up.

  48. Re:There is plenty of arbitrage. Fees, delays limi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many people who do Bitcoin arbitrage. Software for doing so is readily available. Exchange fees and the time required to settle transactions limit the profitability and increase the risk. You don't know for sure if your transaction will settle until days later. Recently, there were 200,000 transactions awaiting settlement.

    There is also risk from exchange issues, and not just frauds and hacks. An FDIC-insured bank has to prove it has sufficient assets to cover liabilities, both liquid and long term. With no such regulation of Bitcoin exchanges, it's natural for exchanges to try to increase profits by pushing the limits on liabilities vs actual cash available. An honest but eager exchange owner can easily accidentally create a situation in which they aren't able to make promised pay outs.

    No major bank in the world today has sufficient assets to cover its liabilities. If everyone cleared out their deposit accounts at once the bank would need to borrow against it's long-term investments to make everyone whole.

    Bitcoin exchanges today do a better job of this. Given that so many bitcoin exchanges have failed in the past, some customers, particularly large volume customers, demand a certain level of transparency and security. This demand was more prevalent following the collapse of Mt.Gox but it has been diluted with the influx of new users who are not used to the greater responsibility the free market burdens them with.

    I agree we can expect more failures, and some of them will be spectacular.

  49. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China does this all the time, what should have happened is anything US and UK exchange related should have locked ALL CHINESE accounts when china governement decided to do this again. There is absolutely NO WAY the Chinese Government is going to ban or deregulate bitcoin. the amount of tax Dollars China wreaks in between the sales on the Bitcoin mining equipment combined with the Bitcoin mining they do themselves, they serve to lose to much money. They dumped what they bought at lower prices and cashed out their Bitcoin mining to take their early 4th qtr profits. Give it 6 months to a year and they will be back saying they have taken the hold off Bitcoin regulations. The last time they did this ironically they did a crowd funding sort of thing to get funding for Alibaba, Alibaba yes the biggest scvam shopping marketplace on the internet, where the Chinese people violate multiple laws and trade practices and sell nmmost of the mining equipment aftermarket. They needede funds so they banned Bitcoin made the investors sell their bitcoin and invest in Alibaba. then about 6 months to a year later after the funding and the business was above water where they wanted it they lifted the ban. This is not the first time, and will not be the last. What is nice to see is they dont have the hold on the market they thought they did. a loss of 1500 dollars only is not a bad loss for a market the size of Bitcoin. Now if it can hold above 3000 for the next year when they come back (like they always do) and lift the regulations AGAIN, it will go up over 5K.

  50. Re:Drop of $1000? $5000 - $4108 1000 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its down to 3300 from almost 4500