Slashdot Mirror


Recordings of the Sounds Heard In the Cuban US Embassy Attacks Released (apnews.com)

New submitter chrissfoot shares a report from The Associated Press: The Associated Press has obtained a recording of what some U.S. Embassy workers heard in Havana in a series of unnerving incidents later deemed to be deliberate attacks. The recording, released Thursday by the AP, is the first disseminated publicly of the many taken in Cuba of mysterious sounds that led investigators initially to suspect a sonic weapon. The recordings themselves are not believed to be dangerous to those who listen. Sound experts and physicians say they know of no sound that can cause physical damage when played for short durations at normal levels through standard equipment like a cellphone or computer. What device produced the original sound remains unknown. Americans affected in Havana reported the sounds hit them at extreme volumes. You can listen to the "Dangerous Sound" here via YouTube.

300 comments

  1. The recordings themselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    >The recordings themselves are not believed to be dangerous

    So we can rule out Kanye West...?

    1. Re:The recordings themselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just want us to rule out microwave radiation. They'll string us along with theory after theory...until the story fizzles and dies.

    2. Re:The recordings themselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my hearing after many yrs of loud rock can't hear it, are you sure there is a sound?

  2. It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 0

    ... therefore it must be a weapon.

    Not that I have any idea what it was, but I'd be more inclined to suspect some kind of one-off natural phenomenon more than I'd suspect a weapon, given there is not an iota of evidence to suggest that malicious intent must have been behind the harm it caused.

    But hey.... assuming intelligent intent behind something that we don't yet fully understand is historically a very human thing to do.... why should we be any different now than our caveman ancestors?

    1. Re:It was harmful... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

      There could never be any plausible malicious intent by people in Cuba against U.S. Embassy personnel. There's just no precedent and no motive.

      The Cuban people were NOT indoctrinated for years to view U.S. Government entities as their enemy. There is NO possibility that rogue elements within Cuban society might be doing this 'For Fidel' out of ideological zeal.

      Nope. None of that should even be considered.

    2. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All due respect" but you're a fucking moron pulling shit out of your ass. You obviously didn't read a damn thing about this before you came up with your spiel.

      This wasn't a 1-off event and THERE IS no natural explanation anywhere near this type of thing. It happened inside various locations over a long period of time, and it probably included different types of attacks overall to explain the vast array of different symptoms and observations from the victims.

      Read more, then guess around like a semi-informed asshole like the rest of us. Don't just pull shit out of your ass.

    3. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All we really know is there have been sonic attacks against both US and Canadian government employees. Since itâ(TM)s inpacting a small specific group itâ(TM)s unlikey to be natural or accidental and is likely a targeted attack.

      While itâ(TM)s extremely unlikely it was a sanctioned government action from Cuba, there is no evidence and no reason to exclude Cubans or some of those in their government, as most likely there are some Cubans who dislike the US and which could try to cause harm, as well as there are Cubans who dislike their government and want the US to push back on the current regime, which is unlikely if the governments are friendly. Also it could be a unknown actor such as Russia who wants to create chaos.

    4. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Right.... show me the weapon, or even come up with some kind of explanation for what kind of weapon it actually might have been, and I might be inclined to believe you.

      The mindset that there must have been some kind of intelligence behind it is entirely unsubstantiated superstition until you can at least *hypothesize* how it might actually happened.

    5. Re:It was harmful... by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *grin* subtle, at least initially.

      I'm more inclined to believe that it's another state-actor or else a very, very large criminal enterprise, something on the international scale.

      If a state-actor they want to limit the US and the West generally from bringing Cuba into the fold.

      If it's a large criminal enterprise, it would be because they are using Cuba for some part of their operation that would be identified and shut down if the US were more heavily involved in Cuba.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia probably isn't thrilled that we're in Cuba and they've been known to pull dick moves with U.S. embassy staff in their own country.

    7. Re:It was harmful... by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There could never be any plausible malicious intent by people in Cuba against U.S. Embassy personnel. There's just no precedent and no motive.

      The Cuban people were NOT indoctrinated for years to view U.S. Government entities as their enemy. There is NO possibility that rogue elements within Cuban society might be doing this 'For Fidel' out of ideological zeal.

      Nope. None of that should even be considered.

      I'm pretty sure they US public has been more thoroughly indoctrinated to view Cuba as the spawn of Satan by the US media than the Cuban government could ever hope to indoctrinate the Cuban people to view the US as a mere 'enemy'. I attribute this largely to the fact that the average Cuban is better educated and generally better informed than the average American.

    8. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem very angry. Don't worry the raging hormones stage of puberty doesn't last forever.

    9. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sonic weapon. Remember the sonic tanks in the RTS Dune games? That, except not as advance.

    10. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Until Newton came up with his laws of gravitation, why the heavenly bodies moved the way that they did was not understood either. Clearly, they must have only done so because of some divine will, right? Uh.... no.

      As I said elsewhere, there is *FAR* more about the universe that we don't know than what we don't know about the limits of human accomplishment, and that makes it vastly more likely to be some sort of unexplained natural phenomenon than an unexplained weapon.

    11. Re:It was harmful... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *grin* subtle, at least initially.

      I'm more inclined to believe that it's another state-actor or else a very, very large criminal enterprise, something on the international scale.

      If a state-actor they want to limit the US and the West generally from bringing Cuba into the fold.

      I agree with you. And a smarter administration would be asking the following questions instead of just assuming "evil Cubans did this 'cause they're commies!"

      Is there a nation that thrives on chaos and disorder in the world, particularly when it is the cause of such chaos and disorder?
      Is there a nation that regards human life so little that it sent agents on a public airline with a radioactive element to kill a dissident and gave no concern to the impact the radioactivity would have on its own agents or the unknowing passengers?
      Is there a nation that would benefit from Cuban-USA relations deteriorating?

      The answer to all of the above is Russia.

    12. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Right.... explain how that would work, exactly.

      Making an analogy to something that doesn't even exist in real life is not an explanation... it is conjecture.

      You could suggest that assuming it is a natural phenomenon is conjecture as well, but there's a whole lot more about the laws of nature that we don't fully understand than there is what we don't know about the limits of human technological achievement so far, so assuming it was natural unless or until you can at least actually show what sort of technology could actually do this seems like the safer bet.

    13. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      There is one question you are missing, before you can reasonably blame Russia, or anyone else for that matter:

      Does any known technology exist that could have actually caused this to occur?

      Hey, I'll admit that it's certainly *possible* that it could some unknown technology, but to the best of my knowledge, nobody has been able come up with any kind of theories about how that a weapon with that kind of technology would even work in the real world.

    14. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point you're just being willfully ignorant. Literally go to wikipedia and type in "sonic weapon" and they'll give all sorts of examples of ones that have actually been used and deployment histories of them. If you can't be bothered to do that basic level of investigation when people are saying you're talking out of your ass to see if just maybe you might be talking out of your ass, then you deserve no sympathy.

    15. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. I hope you don't fall for "blame the foreigners" when it come to immigration and job losses.

    16. Re:It was harmful... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2

      You're talking about diplomats/spies - arguably the most politically-driven profession on Earth. Foul play is the norm there, not the outlier.

    17. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      And yet despite this, nobody actually has any idea what *real* weapon could do this. I'm more inclined to think there are things we don't know about the world around us and its natural laws than I am willing to presume nefarious intent with some heretofore unprecedented technology

    18. Re:It was harmful... by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      Yeah the whole "Accoustic weapon" thing seems a bit too sci-fi for my liking. Like, what would be the point? The Cubans are *super keen* to not piss off the Americans right now, other than a few nationalistic grumbles, because post-fidel cuba knows thats how it gets out of its rut, but normalizing trade with its wealthy neighbor.

      So I dont see a motive. And the weapon, excuse my skepticism but if its *high* pitches we're talking about thats even fishier,due to the higher difficulties of propagating high pitches along with the easier task of locating the source. Super low frequencies, maybe , but high frequencies? I highly doubt it. But a busted old tube television set, or whistling from a damaged HF transformer, theres are some noises that can get on your nerves very quickly, and both *entirely reasonable* things to occur natively on an island thats been subsiding on leftovers from the old USSR for half a lifetime.

      So no motive, no weapon, a bunch of sick diplomats with symptoms may well just be an odd-ball bug going around (embassies see a lot of back packers, aka "virus vectors").

      We sure theres a crime scene here?

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    19. Re:It was harmful... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      So you're comparing yourself to NEWTON now because YOU WERE TOO LAZY TO READ ANYTHING ABOUT THIS SUBJECT and invented some BS FUD instead! Great work, gravity solved!

      Isn't pop-sci grand? I'm perpetually fascinated and disgusted by the fact our leaders thought it fitting to try to educate the plebeians in order to fluff up the numbers of the intellectual class, without regard to the fact you simply can't fix stupid. "Geek culture" has to end - they infect /., they steal the word "nerd" to describe dressing up as characters from TVs and movies, and they constantly spew FUD for the sake of satisfying their own misplaced desire to be a part of a group they are intellectually incapable of being a part of by simply parroting everything they hear in the most inappropriate contexts while taking precious time from actual nerds who are driven into fits of raging and ranting over their stupidity. It used to be you could see someone playing with a robot, know your kin, and go start a conversation which goes into conspiracies or theoretical physics while finding a friend, now you just get ostracized by some intellectual parasite of a pop-culture-wannabe you had no desire to communicate with anyway because they from an outside perspective appear like one of you. Sadly we'll never take back the internet, but we might be able to switch to something with a high fatality rate when fucked up - like AM band HAM radio text messaging, at least then the problem will self-correct if the bastards try to follow us.

    20. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'And a smarter administration would be asking the following questions instead of just assuming "evil Cubans did this 'cause they're commies!" '

      Yes, this started in 2016, so where was obamas investigation? I wish he was smarter too.

    21. Re: It was harmful... by paai · · Score: 1

      I read the other day that it may also be a perfect example of mass hysteria...

      Anyway: if the americans REALLY suspect a new weapon, they would not have closed the embassy, but replaced the personell with scientists to try and discover what was going on.

      Paai

    22. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Except of course for the fact that the tech you referred to couldn't cause this because if it could then they would know how the attack was done even if they didn't yet know who or why. Pay attention to this point: as an attack, nobody knows what really could have caused this (except for you, evidently). I haven't claimed to know for certain it was a natural phenomenon, I just think it's more likely to be the case than blindly subscribing to paranoid propaganda until we can show some real world working weapon that could have actually done this in those exact circumstances.

    23. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah, they've not been indoctrinated. Unlike much of the USA who have been indoctrinated by the reds-under-the-bed propaganda. Sure, lots are pissed off because the embargo the US put on them is hurting them personally, but that's somewhat correct to be pissed off at, even if taken "too far".

    24. Re:It was harmful... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Hackaday had an article that it could be a directed microwave weapon, and the audio is a hallucination.

      Seems more likely than the audio being the cause of memory loss, brain damage, etc...

      The motive is hard to imagine.

    25. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing CIA-Billy. The Cubans totes want to fuck up their relationships with one of their longest supporters - Canada. Did you even read any other sources to inform yourself that Americans were not the only ones "attacked"??

    26. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so long ago, there was retailers using ultrasound to create audio markers that could be picked up by smartphones. Could this be some kind of tracking system that picks up MAC addresses, then broadcasts them ultrasonically to be picked up by other devices or the mobile phone network.

      http://ubeacsec.org/downloads/report.pdf
      https://www.wired.com/2016/11/block-ultrasonic-signals-didnt-know-tracking/

      Or this could be a Mosquito deterrent to keep people away from embassy:

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11984317/Couple-face-5000-fine-for-installing-anti-child-noise-repellant-outside-their-home.html

    27. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure maybe Russia since they would be incentivized to disrupt normalizing US relations with Cuba... it doesn't make much sense that it would be the Cubans unless it was somehow ease-dropping equipment that malfunctioned and caused harm. It could also be some rogue CIA faction or individual that doesn't want to relations with the new Castro regime normalized. Or a rogue Cuban.

      People often underestimate the ability of individuals and small groups to influence foreign policy with their on the ground actions. It appears that all someone needed was the right equipment which could have been made in a workshop and know-how to pull this off.

      Bottom line is that I think it is in the interest of both the US and Cuba to get normalization back on track. Cuba isn't a threat to the US and there is potential for good trade and tourism. And we consider far far worse regimes in the world as even "allies". Given the proximity to the US it is in our interest to stop working to undermine the regime using sanctions which have been proven to only drive Cuba to better relations with other world powers.

    28. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The details of the knock out gas used to resolve the Moscow theater hostage crisis in 2002 are *still* not known.

    29. Re: It was harmful... by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All we really know is there have been sonic attacks against both US and Canadian government employees.

      That's jumping to conclusions.
      My SWAG is that it's a CIA product that's to blame, like a high frequency vibrator attached to windows to thwart laser listening, and that with the panes used in Cuba, the unfortunate side effect is that it acts as a speaker element and causes the sound "attacks".

      I.e. Hanlon's razor.

    30. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there are plenty of plausible theories as to what it could be. No one has yet to provide a *reasonable* hypothesis as to how a sonic weapon that fits the facts presented would actually work.

    31. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very large criminal enterprise

      No need to bring Microsoft into this.

    32. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it was Hyman Roth?

    33. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the god of the gaps argument.

    34. Re: It was harmful... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Or by the Russians?If the Cuban government didn't want them there they would simply ask them to leave. Cuba is one of Russia's few allies

    35. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me, show me, or it doesn't exist!
      You sound like a child, or possibly a flat-earther.

    36. Re:It was harmful... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Who says it was Cubans doing it? Maybe Russian spies? Or a conflicted Cuban Government with some departments or factions wanting no deal

    37. Re: It was harmful... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      I play the Unfounded Paranoia game too:

      Anyway: if the americans REALLY suspect a new weapon, they would not have closed the embassy, but replaced the personell with scientists to try and discover what was going on.

      If America is developing the same kind of weapon, we would rather pull our people out instead of tipping our hand by deploying a countermeasure.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    38. Re: It was harmful... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      They could figure that out relatively easily. Also, the effect would be limited to personnel in/near the embassy. Apparently, some attacks have occurred outside the embassy grounds.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    39. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, you are a dullard. Seriously, you have no critical thinking skills whatsoever.

    40. Re: It was harmful... by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They could figure that out relatively easily. Also, the effect would be limited to personnel in/near the embassy. Apparently, some attacks have occurred outside the embassy grounds.

      From what I can tell, only in places where the spooks might see reasons to install anti-surveillance equipment, like the domiciles of operatives.

      And, again, it's alleged attacks. Without us having seen any actual evidence for it being attacks, you're begging the question.

    41. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does any known technology exist that could have actually caused this to occur?

      Bluetooth Ear Buds.

    42. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That doesn't jive at all with the experiences of my friends that went to Cuba after obtaining a press pass. I'm sure some Cubans grew up hating America just has some Americans grow up that way. They are in the definitely minority though.

      I'm also not sure where you are getting this idea that they were rioting over normalization of relations. The rioting they did last year was over democracy reforms, they felt emboldened by normalization and were not against it.

      While I agree we shouldn't jump to conclusions, you seem to be doing an awful lot of that yourself.

    43. Re:It was harmful... by HiThere · · Score: 0

      Are there? I haven't heard any. Of course, it's also true that I haven't been looking, but I'd think that if there were at least one plausible theory it would have been blasted all over the news media.

      The closest I come is that they might have directed the air flights to the Havana airport low over the consulate...but that didn't fit the described effects, which were supposed to be focused.

      Actually, the cause that I've heard that best fits the described effects is the "Apple earbuds" theory that someone came up with above. That's a bit silly, but if they *were* using Apple earbuds they could be periodically blasted with loud sounds through interfering radio signals. Which might be on a band quite legal locally and used for some irregularly occurring purpose.

      OTOH, I didn't go to youtube to listen to the purported sounds, either. So I'm just operating on news stories that I happened across.

      One comment, though: If the US really believed that it *was* some secret weapon, wouldn't it try to find out what it was before shutting down the source of information?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    44. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of Cuban people I've encountered hated the Cuban government, not the U.S. government. The friends of mine that have gone to Cuba have all encountered the same. A very friendly people looking for opportunity to thrive.

      I'm not sure about Fox News but the rest of the media I've seen has been rather indifferent towards Cuba for the last 20 years. So most Americans certainly don't hate Cubans either.

    45. Re:It was harmful... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It's not at all clear that "there is *FAR* more about the universe that we don't know than what we don't know". That *might* be true, but it's not really the way to bet unless you are counting all the small details.

      OTOH, the small details can have a significant effect on how well the implementation works, so it's not really unfair to count them, it's just very different than the major rules. But if that's what you mean, you shouldn't mix them with things like Newton's law of universal gravitation. You should make a clear distinction.

      That said, we clearly *are* missing a few of the basic laws, and it's possible that we're missing most of them. It's also possible that we've so misunderstood the ones we have that they'll need to be completely reformulated. But that's not the way to bet. Unless you can get really long odds.

      From my "all I know is what I (happen to) read in the papers" point of view this "attack" could be anything from allergies affecting their nerves to a subtle poison attack to them wearing ear buds that operated on a frequency that was locally used for industrial control. But if the US govt. thought it was a secret weapon, wouldn't they try to discover what it was and how it worked before removing their source of information?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    46. Re:It was harmful... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      *facepalm* journalists in Cuba get a carefully presented view of Cuba. You think they're going to be allowed in the prisons where they keep the right-wingers? Sheesh.

      The rioting I referred to was in America, genius. If that much anti-American hate lies among domestic communists, it's not a jump to conclusions that Havana feels the same way. They have more in common with each other than they do the rest of America, that's for sure.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    47. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or nobody wants to officially say.

      But I've got it, you're a troll, well done. No intelligent person would go on this way, only a troll would. It was decent trolling at first when nobody was providing actual facts, but once actual facts were presented and you continue to put your fingers in your ears, it does become obvious.

    48. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      I wasn't trying to troll at all... only refusing to blindly believe in a baseless claim that is driven more by paranoia than by any facts.

      It's obvious that we don't really have any facts to come to a reasoned conclusion, but that's still no reason to come to the conclusion that somebody was attacking them

    49. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I've been trying to say, yet somehow, I'm getting labelled as a troll.

    50. Re:It was harmful... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Just because "blame the foreigners" is commonly used to distract from a country's own failings doesn't mean that foreign governments aren't, in fact, at fault for a good many things.

    51. Re:It was harmful... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Christ, you are a dullard. Seriously, you have no critical thinking skills whatsoever.

      Look, the AC had a point. That this was just some sort of "natural phenomena" that we just haven't discovered yet which caused focused brain damage to diplomats strains credibility. It's not 100% impossible, but the odds are so much against that that the onus is on the natural phenomena crowd to prove it.

    52. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or, like the article actually says, nobody has been able to figure out how any existing technology could *actually* produce these specific kinds of results in the context in which they occurred.

      That, and that alone, is my reason for doubting that it was a weapon... because in my observation, when it comes to things that you currently lack the ability to explain, it's usually much more reasonable to presume that there is a natural explanation behind to than to blindly ascribe some intelligence behind it, and it is most definitely blindly in this case, because we not only don't know the who or the why, we don't even actually know the how beyond waxing into science fiction.

      Sure, it could be a weapon that nobody's ever heard of before and is being kept super-secret, but by virtue of the conspiracy theory fallacy, this is not a sufficient basis to come to any sort of reasoned conclusion that it was actually a weapon.

      The only thing that we can say for sure is that we don't know what really happened beyond some people were quite seriously harmed, and whatever caused it, it seems that sound played an important factor. Should this be investigated? Abso-friggen-lutey... but approaching this with the supposition that it must be some kind off weapon is baseless paranoia, not healthy caution.

    53. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC theory here: it's not a sonic weapon - it's a high-frequency RF device that's used for intercepting communications. The device works by sending out a thin RF antenna pattern. The sounds may be induced within the inner ear fluid by the RF beam as it's being aimed at the building and people are moving through the beam or vice-versa. It would have the same effect outside the building.

    54. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But hey.... assuming intelligent intent

      So, again, we can rule out Kanye West?

    55. Re:It was harmful... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You'd think in a country that literally went through McCarthyism, that people would be more suspicious about blaming TEH ROOSHINS for our problems. Especially the Left, they were the victims of this vile crime! Serious WTF here. We all know, right, that Podesta penned this dolchstoss-legende the day after Hillary lost the election. Right? Please tell me we know this.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    56. Re:It was harmful... by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Hackaday had an article that it could be a directed microwave weapon, and the audio is a hallucination.

      Seems more likely than the audio being the cause of memory loss, brain damage, etc...

      The motive is hard to imagine.

      If it was a hallucination, we wouldn't have an audio recording of it.

    57. Re:It was harmful... by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Good summary. Including the part about the Cubans be super motivated not to piss off the US.

      In fact I think that is the general pattern. The designated enemies of the US can deem it necessary to display sabre rattling of an essentially defensive nature, but they by and large try hard to keep the door open for improvements in the relations.

      There's also the possibility that the US already knows the explaination of the sounds but is embarassed about it so keeps quiet.

    58. Re:It was harmful... by epine · · Score: 1

      The Cubans are *super keen* to not piss off the Americans right now, other than a few nationalistic grumbles, because post-Fidel Cuba knows that's how it gets out of its rut, but normalizing trade with its wealthy neighbor.

      Clearly, any weapon this mysterious is backed by a resolved, national consensus. That much we know.

      We also know that incompetence bests malice in the post season every damn time. So my guess is that they were targetting Canadians, but got a few passports mixed up, and ended up angering the Americans completely by accident.

      Why Canada? Because the Cuban national consensus is *not* super keen right now to avoid pissing off Canadians.

    59. Re:It was harmful... by skids · · Score: 1

      The fingered waveform is suggestive of OFDM which would make the objective most likely communication, not physiological harm. But, hardly a pattern normally seen in nature. Perhaps some sort of intentionally-non-RF data exfiltration technology that worked without anyone noticing until someone tried to run a different modulation scheme over it.

      Oh also, mandatory advice on what to do if you here this sound.

    60. Re:It was harmful... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      The recording might not be authentic.

    61. Re:It was harmful... by Matheus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sonic weaponry is not new and far from unknown... causing damage isn't even that hard. The question is whether they've perfected making specific targeted changes to a person with this tech.

      For example: I could turn anyone into a mindless pile right now using little more than the pencil on my desk, BUT if I wanted to, instead, slightly change your behavior I'd need a *really fancy pencil ;)

      The sound in the video is fairly similar to a mixture of a tornado siren and some cicadas but the length of the sample is too short.. would be interesting to do some waveform analysis on how the fluctuations change over a much longer period of time. The brain has a way of filtering out a fairly constant "annoying" sound so the fluctuations you can hear in the short segment probably have a fairly calculated variation pattern to continually force the brain's pattern matcher out of sync (while maybe at the same time gaming the matcher to change behavior with parts of the signal that don't change..)

      Hacking the brain is fun! :-D

    62. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lying faggot with admin cock up your ass.

    63. Re:It was harmful... by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      We know magic doesn't exist, but sufficiently developed tech seems like magic. We know these incidents targeted only western diplomats in Cuba. So, it was created by people to harm other people. That is... a weapon.

      Who could develop such a high tech weapon? Cubans or Russians?

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    64. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll faggot mart-t best watch yourself

    65. Re:It was harmful... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Right.... show me the weapon, or even come up with some kind of explanation for what kind of weapon it actually might have been, and I might be inclined to believe you.

      Megahertz-capable high-power ultrasonic transducers are commonly used in underwater applications. If you want to create a dangerous super-audible signal it is trivial. And phasing can deal with directionality. This is all a quite trivial extension of existing technology.

      If you doubt that you can focus ultrasonic signals, think about what is now a nearly ubiquitous application of that. If you can't think of one, ask any pregnant woman to "see the pictures". If you can't imagine ultrasound being able to cause damage, ask any tree-hugger, I mean, whale-hugger, about US naval sonar -- another example of focused sound.

      The mindset that there must have been some kind of intelligence behind it is entirely unsubstantiated superstition until you can at least *hypothesize* how it might actually happened.

      Ok. Just did that. And since the damage was being done to US and Canadian citizens and not to a large number of Cubans, that makes a "natural process" very doubtful. Is there some genetic difference between US/Canadians and Cubans that would account for a difference in damage to someone's hearing?

      Occam's razor.

    66. Re: It was harmful... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Except of course for the fact that the tech you referred to couldn't cause this because if it could then they would know how the attack was done

      Knowing one way of doing it is not proof that it was done that way. No, until they find the actual source they won't know how it was done, but they can guess. That's sure a lot more productive than repeated denials that it was being done based on ignorance of technology.

      I bet that the people who are looking into this have theories, but they aren't giving you a daily briefing because you don't have a need to know. Nor do I. The difference between you and me appears to be that I can think of ways that current technology can be used to cause harm to people and you can't.

      until we can show some real world working weapon that could have actually done this in those exact circumstances.

      Yes, nobody can point to a secret weapon, so it doesn't exist. Nobody could point you to the A-bomb until we dropped a couple of them, and even then there was nothing left to point at. Apparently A-bombs are "natural phenomenon" because I can't point at the ones that wiped out Hiroshima or Nagasaki as proof of how it was done. Since I don't have access to any of them, I can't even point at an existing atomic weapon as a potential cause.

    67. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I wasn't alleging that there needs to be a complete proof that it was an attack before you can reasonably label it as one, I am saying that there needs to be proof that it *COULD* have been a weapon.... that is, the effects and the circumstances that surrounded them, could plausibly be caused by some weapon that is known to factually exist.

    68. Re:It was harmful... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      You've cracked the case! These are excellent questions!

      The answer to all of the above is Russia.

      Oh... the answer that I came to was America. Except for the radioactive part of course.

    69. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What lies am I supposedly telling here? I never once said that it was certainly a natural occurrence, only that I'd be more inclined to suspect that it is one unless or until somebody has offered any proof that some sonic weapon which we *KNOW* can actually be built in the real world, and would actually cause the kinds of effects we are seeing here, and in those circumstances.

      I'm not suggesting that they should necessarily offer some kind of irrefutable proof that it was a real attack to suggest that the idea that it was an attack should be more likely, I'm only suggesting that some kind of real evidence be shown of some *ACTUAL* weapon, that really does exist or that we *KNOW* that the technology exists to build, which can produce the kinds of effects that were observed here, not just offering the conjecture that it must have been some kind of super-secret sonic weapon that operates on some heretofore completely undiscovered principle just because we can't imagine what else it could have been. That's just paranoia, and not healthy scientific skepticism.

    70. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You misinterpreted my meaning.... it's my bad, however, I could have been more clear.

      I did not mean to suggest that there's more about the universe than there is that we don't know about what humans CAN or COULD accomplish, I meant that there's more about the universe that we don't know than there is that we don't know about what humans have *actually* accomplished to date.

      Offering the explanation that it was a sonic weapon presupposes that somebody has managed (past tense) to invent this thing, despite the fact that nobody around seems to really have the faintest clue how such a weapon would even actually work. While some sonic weapons do exist, none that are known to exist would (or could) have caused this... if it was a weapon, it is using some completely unknown technology to achieve its effects.

      And at that point, you may as well say that it was UFO's and aliens.

    71. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      We know these incidents targeted only western diplomats in Cuba.

      The phrasing presupposes that it was a weapon... all we know is that only western diplomats in Cuba were affected. Sure,it might have been a weapon, but nobody's been plausibly able to show how such a weapon would have actually even worked, so there's no reason to presuppose that the technology exists anywhere without subscribing to conspiracy theories.

      Now granted, some conspiracy theories turn out to be true, but there's a reason why anyone should approach such a theory with a healthy dose of skepticism, and never presume one to be true until you have reasonable basis to not only conclude the explanation within the theory to be probable, but consider it no less likely that such a secret could even be maintained.

    72. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has shown...
      And...
      No one has been able to show...
      Are very different from "no one can show."

      I can produce that effect on demand for the right price. I came up with a similar one serendipitously while working on other things. 500' range is viable with hobbyist grade funding, much less with military state budgets.

      Where is the million dollar bounty for my research?

    73. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McCarthyism wasn't about blaming innocent Russians. It was about Senator McCarthy blaming innocent, mostly non specific Americans who were, not coincidentally, his political rivals of being Russian sympathizers without any evidence.

      So its basically the complete opposite of the accusations against Trump, if you are trying to draw that comparison.

    74. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I can produce that effect on demand for the right price.

      That's funny... because according to the article, nobody is able to figure out how the believed sonic weapon that did this would have actually worked.

      Yet apparently, you can do it... cool.

    75. Re:It was harmful... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Does any known technology exist that could have actually caused this to occur?

      Intermodulation from multiple high power ultrasound transmitters.

    76. Re:It was harmful... by TWX · · Score: 1

      That was basically what I was speculating on, and the possibility of using parabolic dishes or some other highly directional means to aim the signal at each point of emissions.

      Think this XKCD but with a little less humor.

      The descriptions we've had publicly released indicate that the points of effect are very narrow, sometimes as narrow as a single room, sometimes as narrow as the bed. If ultrasound transmitters are positioned in adjacent floors or adjacent buildings, or even in vans on the street, all trained on the room or the bed, then when the signals aren't overlapping they're not really having any effect, but where their paths overlap they intermodulate and that's where a human is medically affected.

      What we haven't really been told is if these attacks have been on the personal residences of staff that are outside of the embassy, if they've been on official staff apartments within the embassy, and what the architecture and construction is. I expect all of these have been above-ground. As bedrooms I expect that there are windows, and if the weather in Cuba is like the weather in Hawaii, windows may be thin or may spend a lot of time open to the air. If there's essentially no barrier, then perhaps sleeping in a different part of the building with either no windows, or with windows that only open into a fully enclosed interior courtyard might prevent attacks from being practical, or if materials like dual-pane windows manage to block some kind of ultrasound or infrasound waves, install those and instruct staff to keep exterior-facing windows closed, only opening windows to interior courtyards at night.

      Admittedly I'm not an acoustics expert but if they think that inaudible sound is causing the damage, it would seem that moving to where that sound cannot reach would be the simplest solution.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    77. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the close second answer to all of the above is the USA.

      Think on these things ...

    78. Re: It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguing with yourself? You forgot to tick the anon button, thanks for playing. You're just trying to ruin the view of the thread for some reason I can only imagine involves a lot money being thrown somewhere.

    79. Re:It was harmful... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The descriptions we've had publicly released indicate that the points of effect are very narrow, sometimes as narrow as a single room, sometimes as narrow as the bed.

      Reflections will cause phase cancellation and reinforcement. In extreme cases, the origin may be completely masked by this.

      If ultrasound transmitters are positioned in adjacent floors or adjacent buildings, or even in vans on the street, all trained on the room or the bed, then when the signals aren't overlapping they're not really having any effect, but where their paths overlap they intermodulate and that's where a human is medically affected.

      They may still have an effect but the nonlinearity will produce mixing products in the audible range.

      The thing which puzzles me is that if ultrasound is being used, then it should be unambiguously detectable with the proper instrumentation. Even I could hack something together in a day. Ultrasound receivers usually include a focusing dish for both directivity and sensitivity but that would not be needed at high levels.

    80. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly Russia is suspect #1. Could be elements within the Cuban regime who prefer things the way they were, hardliners. But, of course, they would be in league with Russia, so it amounts to the same thing.
      And, of course, it could be the US, creating an excuse to withdraw. And to test their infrasonic weapons.

    81. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely the United States to be honest

      Who has the means to make and deploy ultrasonic weapons?

      The United States - maybe you've heard of LRAD? The US invented and deployed it to both military and police throughout the US and has sold them world-wide. And the technology can easily be miniaturized to a hand-held size that plugs into power mains.

      Who has the motive to disrupt relations with Cuba?

      The United States again. ONLY the US has had sanctions against Cuba since 1960. EVERY OTHER country on the planet has hand open relations, made business investments and plenty of trade and tourism with Cuba the entire time.

      There are still US citizens who are vehemently against Cuban relationships (Cuban-Americans) and many of them have close relationships with CIA and DOD, who both have access to LRAD devices and related technologies.

      Who has the opportunity to use an LRAD-like technology?

      Again, the United States. Most diplomatic missions have a cohort of "diplomats" who are actually CIA agent. This is not in question or surprising. It's been the case since the start of the Cold War and when CIA was still OSS. This allows them to bring in technologies like this into Cuba as diplomatic packages and then they go about amongst the local population under the guise of being a diplomat but can easily

      Who has had a LONG HISTORY of unethical false flag attacks and testing noxious/dangerous weapons against US citizens when it was expedient for political or economic gain?

      The answer goes to the United States again. From Operation Northwoods (which also involved Cuba) to Gulf of Tonkin. From Tuskegee syphillis testing to human plutonium test pregnant women in hospitals to aerosol chemical and biological weapons testing over US cities. The US has a long history of sacrificing its own citizens for specious political gains.

    82. Re: It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No... I responded to this... which isn't even an AC post, so I'm not sure how you thought I was responding to myself.

    83. Re:It was harmful... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Ah... so of course all of the experts who are completely dumbfounded as to the actual cause of this even are overlooking this perfectly obvious explanation. Cool.

      How did you get so smart?

    84. Re: It was harmful... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      In case of Sonic Attack on your district,
      follow these rules...
      If you are making love, it is imperative to bring all bodies to orgasm simultaneously
      Do not waste time blocking your ears
      Do not waste time seeking a soundproof shelter
      Try to get as far away from the sonic source as possible, but do not panic...
      Use your wheels, it is what they are for
      Small babies may be placed inside the special cocoons, which should be left if possible, in a shelter
      Do not attempt to use your own limbs
      If no wheels are available, metal, not organic, limbs should be employed whenever practical...
      Remember, in the case of Sonic Attack,
      Survival does mean every man for himself
      Statistically more people survive
      if they think only of themselvesDo not attempt to rescue friends,
      relatives, or loved ones.
      You have only a few seconds to escape
      Use those seconds sensibly or you will inevitably die
      Do not panic
      Think only of yourselves...

      These are the first signs of Sonic Attack:
      You will notice small objects, such as ornaments, oscillating.
      You will notice a vibration in your diaphragm
      You will hear a distant hissing in your ears
      You will feel dizzy
      You will feel the need to vomit
      There will be bleeding from orifices
      There will be an ache in the pelvic region
      You may be subject to fits of hysterical shouting,
      or even laughter
      These are all sign of imminent Sonic destruction
      Your only real protection is flight
      If you are less than ten years old,
      then remain in your shelter and use your cocoon
      But remember: You can help no-one else,
      No-one else,
      No-one else...

      Read more: Hawkwind - Sonic Attack Lyrics | MetroLyrics

    85. Re:It was harmful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sonic weaponry is not new and far from unknown... causing damage isn't even that hard. The question is whether they've perfected making specific targeted changes to a person with this tech.

      For example: I could turn anyone into a mindless pile right now using little more than the pencil on my desk, BUT if I wanted to, instead, slightly change your behavior I'd need a *really fancy pencil ;)

      The sound in the video is fairly similar to a mixture of a tornado siren and some cicadas but the length of the sample is too short.. would be interesting to do some waveform analysis on how the fluctuations change over a much longer period of time. The brain has a way of filtering out a fairly constant "annoying" sound so the fluctuations you can hear in the short segment probably have a fairly calculated variation pattern to continually force the brain's pattern matcher out of sync (while maybe at the same time gaming the matcher to change behavior with parts of the signal that don't change..)

      Hacking the brain is fun! :-D

      Since sound is energy, it should be possible to find the source of the sound. Once the source is found, it should be able to determine who could have produced the sound generators.

    86. Re:It was harmful... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Ah... so of course all of the experts who are completely dumbfounded as to the actual cause of this even are overlooking this perfectly obvious explanation. Cool.

      How did you get so smart?

      Did you mean the engineering experts at the embassy? I bet they have a lot of those. Any expert can be defeated with politics.

      The question was about "any known technology" and I answered it. There is a trivial test which could have immediately identified if this was the cause yet it has not been done and this is months later. My conclusion is that there are no experts involved or at least there were none during the extended time that whatever it was was going on. Is that so surprising when politicians are in charge?

    87. Re:It was harmful... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Who says it was Cubans doing it? Maybe Russian spies? Or a conflicted Cuban Government with some departments or factions wanting no deal

      I doubt dissent is looked upon fondly within the cuban government. If Raul Castro wants to be nice to america in return for not being embargoed to hell and back, theres a good chance department heads know disobeying President Castro is a good way to get gulaged.

      But now you mention it, russians on the other hand, DO have a motive, which is to say it probably isn't fond of its old vassal state fluttering its eyelids in admiration to its former (and russias current) nemesis. Unfortunately for Russia, The USA is the quarterback in this highschool love triangle, so all spurned Russia can do is pass whispers around accusing cuba of being bit of a loose woman and, uh, deploying crazy accoustic weapons (?). If indeed it is a sound weapon, the fact it makes the US government look even crazier than trump already bonkers contributions to international politics , makes such an approach more interesting.

      HOWEVER As to the scientific validity of it, the fact its supposed to be *high pitched* instead of some sort of bowel upsetting low rumble has me skeptical at best.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    88. Re: It was harmful... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I am saying that there needs to be proof that it *COULD* have been a weapon.... could plausibly be caused by some weapon that is known to factually exist.

      You want proof of something that nobody it going to tell YOU about because it is probably classified. I've already presented a reasonable hypothesis of how such a weapon could operate even if I cannot prove that it exists. By demanding proof that the weapon exists you demand something you know cannot be provided to you, and so you will never accept anything by "natural causes", no matter how unlikely it is that a "natural cause" would impact only US and Canadian diplomats and nobody else.

    89. Re: It was harmful... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      No... I responded to this... which isn't even an AC post, so I'm not sure how you thought I was responding to myself.

      Because the broken /. message display system (maybe the "classic" version, I don't know) when not showing a message that is below the mod cutoff indents the messages incorrectly to make it look like the reply was to something else. For example, I see two comments in a row from you, one that appears to be a reply to yourself.

      And the broken /. display system doesn't clearly identify which is "parent" when the "read parent" link is selected. I've gotten entire threads displayed by doing that, and I have to still guess which is the parent being replied to.

      That's why is it is good to quote some context from the parent so everyone knows.

  3. Supposed experts... by burtosis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sound experts and physicians say they know of no sound that can cause physical damage when played for short durations at normal levels through standard equipment like a cellphone or computer.

    Obviously these people have never heard Trump speak. I actually envy them

    1. Re:Supposed experts... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      They said "physical damage"... emotional damage isn't really considered physical.

    2. Re:Supposed experts... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Good to know that a physical brain isn't responsible for feelings and emotion, nor that anyone has been swayed to violence by his words.

    3. Re:Supposed experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The more that I see every fucking thing on the Internet turn into a logic-free anti-Trump tirade, the more I want to vote for him. For the love of god, please stop.

    4. Re:Supposed experts... by cstacy · · Score: 1

      They said "physical damage"... emotional damage isn't really considered physical.

      http://www.nationalreview.com/...

    5. Re:Supposed experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, please do.... never in my recalled lifetime has US politics been more entertaining to watch from the outside. It'd be awesome to get another 4 more years of this after his first term is over.

      Seriously, watching how your overgrown 12-year old for a president behaves in Office is funnier antics than the best comedy channel stuff I've ever watched.

    6. Re:Supposed experts... by gnick · · Score: 1

      Seriously, watching how your overgrown 12-year old for a president behaves in Office is funnier antics than the best comedy channel stuff I've ever watched.

      The Japanese & South Koreans must not get the joke.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:Supposed experts... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Words can have a powerful effect on your nervous system. Certain types of adversity, even those involving no physical contact, can make you sick, alter your brain - even kill neurons - and shorten your life.

      Your body's immune system includes little proteins called proinflammatory cytokines that cause inflammation when you're physically injured. Under certain conditions, however, these cytokines themselves can cause physical illness. What are those conditions? One of them is chronic stress.

      Your body also contains little packets of genetic material that sit on the ends of your chromosomes. They're called telomeres. Each time your cells divide, their telomeres get a little shorter, and when they become too short, you die. This is normal aging. But guess what else shrinks your telomeres? Chronic stress.

      If words can cause stress, and if prolonged stress can cause physical harm, then it seems that speech - at least certain types of speech - can be a form of violence.

      That's why it's reasonable, scientifically speaking, not to allow a provocateur and hatemonger like Milo Yiannopoulos to speak at your school.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/14/opinion/sunday/when-is-speech-violence.html

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Supposed experts... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      So you don't think there are librul tears?

    9. Re:Supposed experts... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I'm all for free speech, also I am of the opinion that contemporary hate speech restriction goes too far. You marginalize these groups by letting them talk and no one cares, or perhaps people then view them unfavorably. You enable and motivate them by trying to deny them a platform and curtail free speech. That said you do have to admit that trump is tearing this country apart with divisiveness so polarizing even republicans can't get along. And that his speech causes both short term damage to some people who even hear him talk, and long term damage to American democracy.

    10. Re:Supposed experts... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Emotional damage generally has to be pretty severe to cause physical damage. A good analogy is a computer virus - it can wreak all sorts of havoc on the software and data of your PC, but it's very rare that it can cause any physical damage.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    11. Re:Supposed experts... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Curtailing and denying hate speech, doubly so borderline hate speech, only enables and motivates these groups to further action. They can point to these incidents and proclaim they are being oppressed and plead for people to take action. If you let them speak, it's not going to sway many people, more than likely it will just make them even more unpopular and marginalized. I'll go as far as saying the reason a fake populist was elected is due in large part to the ridiculous PC crap that has attempted to curtail honest discussion of the (albeit minor) issues addressing the white working and middle classes. Plus this is a slippery slope as broadening the definition to those levels means you can more easily implement an authoritarian government.

    12. Re:Supposed experts... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Sound experts and physicians say they know of no sound that can cause physical damage when played for short durations at normal levels through standard equipment like a cellphone or computer.

      Obviously these people have never heard Trump speak. I actually envy them

      Self harm is evidence of a mental disorder... You might want to get that physical damage checked out.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    13. Re:Supposed experts... by Shotgun · · Score: 0

      That said you do have to admit that trump is tearing this country apart with divisiveness

      I have to admit no such thing. I would put that squarely in the lap of groups showing up to marches of people with opposing viewpoints wearing black masks and throwing rocks and fireworks into the crowds, and other groups constructing false narratives ("Hands up, Don't shoot"?) and then being upset when the other side calls bullshit on them. The only "divisiveness" cause by Trump is that he actually responds to the vindictiveness of the left, and they're not used to that.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    14. Re:Supposed experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about rarity. I have replaced a hard drive 3 times for the same customer because the MBR was corrupted by malware in a game that they insist is safe (because it is on a CD). I would consider that physical damage (BOOT unmountable).

    15. Re: Supposed experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't say emotional damage doesn't exist to a feminist, or else be prepared for physical damage.

    16. Re:Supposed experts... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Why would you replace the hard drive over a corrupted MBR? Just repartition the drive and create a nice fresh MBR instead - can't tell you how many times I've done that over the years. Data is corrupted, but the physcial hardware is fine.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    17. Re:Supposed experts... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      His political divisiveness manifests in the highest overall changeover rate of whitehouse staff in American history at this point in his presidency, no meaningful legislation, no kept promises, a historic low approval rating for a modern president, and the largest approval rating margin between democrats and republicans of any president since polls were a thing. That last one is a direct measurement of divisiveness. Wanting your conservative views heard is American, supporting a fake populist who is just sabotaging this country to create massive tax cuts for the 0.01% wealthiest Americans and key players is both idiotic and not in 99.9% of the populations best interests.

    18. Re:Supposed experts... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Words do not cause stress. You create stress in your mind. Just because you create stress internally and attribute to some external influences does not change the truth about where it originates.

      Just remember, when you experience stress or distress it is because you are insufficiently processing the external world due to internal issues.

      You are, in essence, malfunctioning internally when you experience negative stress. That you point towards the external stimulus, like words, indicates that you are severely malfunctioning internally. A good starting point is to focus on those subjects which when you encounter them your desire to be rational and intelligent is replaced with a desire to create anger and stress. If you can get your head out of reaction mode and see past where you have given your control up to rampant, uncontrolled emotionalism you may get a glimpse of the unresolved past issue that you are bringing into the present with you. Once you can see the past in your interpretation of the present you can free yourself from it and maintain objectivity more effectively.

      The only problem with this is that when someone identifies with their stress, anger, and outrage as much as it appears you do, eliminating these things is seen as an attack on your ego/identity. It is actually the opposite of that, but as you well know, stupid people doing incredibly stupid and self destructive things are not easily dissuaded from doing them.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    19. Re:Supposed experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His political divisiveness manifests in the highest overall changeover rate of whitehouse staff in American history at this point in his presidency, no meaningful legislation, no kept promises, a historic low approval rating for a modern president, and the largest approval rating margin between democrats and republicans of any president since polls were a thing. That last one is a direct measurement of divisiveness. Wanting your conservative views heard is American, supporting a fake populist who is just sabotaging this country to create massive tax cuts for the 0.01% wealthiest Americans and key players is both idiotic and not in 99.9% of the populations best interests.

      are these the same polls that said trump had next to a zero chance of winning the presidency?

    20. Re: Supposed experts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By definition, no, they cannot be the same polls, because they are about a different thing.

      The polling regarding the outcome of the election was all pretty much within the margin of error.

  4. Seems fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They basically admit it's a simulation. There's no way the AP would be able to "obtain" nor disseminate it if it were really evidence in this ongoing spook dig.

    Granted that's an annoying sound but I doubt it's very similar to what the people affected experienced.

    1. Re:Seems fake by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If this is true, the parent post should not only be modded up, but even added into the summary.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  5. Has anybody analyzed by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The youtube sounds to see if they're legit?

      I've got the order for 20 or so outdoor speakers pointed at my neighbors house waiting on amazon...

    1. Re:Has anybody analyzed by burtosis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those recordings are likely just intermodulation products. Basically they occur because of how differences in the frequencies used appear as separate frequencies themselves, both from imperfections in how the sound is created, transmitted, and the natural way sound behaves. The actual frequencies used were likely above and perhaps even below what regular audio recording would pick up. For example my cellphone signal has on occasion been picked up on nearby wired phones as audiable clicking, due to the modulation being in the human hearing range, even though the carrier frequency is 3+ orders of magnitude too high to hear.

    2. Re:Has anybody analyzed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert wouldn’t comment on the tape’s authenticity.

      So, no, AP ran with a tape from anonymous sources after having listened to several tapes from several anonymous sources which to the reporter sounded similar. Then they ran some filters on the tape "to increase volume and reduce background noise," so what you're hearing is louder than what the AP received from its anonymous source. And, the State Department hasn't confirmed anything about the tape.

    3. Re:Has anybody analyzed by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've analyzed the sounds. If you adjust the equalization carefully, clean up the noise, and adjust the playback speed you can make out that it's actually a message spoken in German:

      Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

    4. Re:Has anybody analyzed by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I hope you had multiple translators, each working on only one word...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:Has anybody analyzed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.

      Hahahahahahahhahaha- <thud>

    6. Re:Has anybody analyzed by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      > The actual frequencies used were likely above and perhaps even below what regular audio recording would pick up

      I'd bet on ultrasound. A nice way to deliver damaging energy to a human ear without that ear detecting it.

      At 120db it causes hearing damage.

    7. Re:Has anybody analyzed by Topwiz · · Score: 1

      That is the 'Killer Joke' from Monty Python. It is just random German gibberish.

    8. Re:Has anybody analyzed by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I think that is much more likely myself also, for that and the additional reasons that powerful low frequency sounds are harder to generate with compact equipment and harder to direct as well. But with the limited info I can't really rule out lower frequencies.

    9. Re:Has anybody analyzed by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I know. That's why I hoped you had each one working on only one word. I understand that you might go the hospital if you accidentally see two of them together.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:Has anybody analyzed by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      That is the 'Killer Joke' from Monty Python. It is just random German gibberish.

      Of course. If they had used the actual joke they would have caused the deaths of tens, if not hundreds, of Monty Python fans, and probably would have been sued. They had to replace it with a non-functional variant to protect us.

  6. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    It's time to round up the nerds.

    Everybody else seems to be content watching the weekly Sports Broadcasts on Saturday. Those nerds are messing around with wires and poking in parts of the computer they're not supposed to be in.

  7. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The score (from http://www.politifact.com/trut...) as of 2015...counts deaths of Americans in America:

          24: number of Americans killed by terrorism in the last decade

          208,024: number of Americans killed by guns in the last decade

  8. low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both low frequency sound and high frequency sound can cause negative health effects... and any recordings of audible sounds were likely caused by some resonance at an audible frequency. Any audiophiles out there have an idea what frequency this could have been based on the resonant sound produced?

    Seems this is quite an insidious way to mess with people, just set up some equipment and point it at someone's home or building and they are going to have a bunch of unfortunate health issues that will be disruptive to their lives and work.

    I'm guessing we have the CIA or old KGB to thank for coming up with the techniques that have now gone mainstream apparently.

    1. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was it the "brown note"?

    2. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by spoot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Worked in broadcasting for a lot of years. I knew an engineer who had troubles with his next door neighbors in an apartment building. So, brought home an amplifier, tone generator and a couple of JBL's and set them against the wall, adjoining the neighbors bedroom. Not sure of the freq, 10hz or lower, and cranked it up when he wasn't home. If you put your hands on the wall, you could feel it, but not hear it. I think the neighbors moved out within a few months.

    3. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by Boutzev · · Score: 1

      It was Jimbob farting.

    4. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall hearing that prolonged exposure to such ery low-frequency tones at high volume can cause cardiovascular problems - which makes that completely irresponsible and borderline criminal.

      On the other hand I've got a friend who had issues with noisy neighbors - his solution was to really crank up his speakers and play an FPS whenever they got noisy. Got them trained to be more considerate pretty quickly.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by dpidcoe · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall hearing that prolonged exposure to such ery low-frequency tones at high volume can cause cardiovascular problems - which makes that completely irresponsible and borderline criminal.

      Oh give me a break and quit your retarded hand-wringing. Prolonged exposure to a lot of things can cause all kinds of health issues. Under that way of thinking it's time to press charges against your neighbors for trying to kill you via increased cancer risk by lighting off a charcoal grill in their backyard.

    6. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by spoot · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall hearing that prolonged exposure to such ery low-frequency tones at high volume can cause cardiovascular problems - which makes that completely irresponsible and borderline criminal.

      On the other hand I've got a friend who had issues with noisy neighbors - his solution was to really crank up his speakers and play an FPS whenever they got noisy. Got them trained to be more considerate pretty quickly.

      irresponsible and borderline criminal is pretty much how I remember said engineer

    7. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you're so actually so naive as to not know the difference between doing something with the active intent to cause mental and/or physical harm to someone, and doing something which inadvertently leads to situations in which someone might assume a risk of injury. Driving a car while a person is on the sidewalk is dangerous, and that person might fall into the street and get hit. That doesn't put nearly the same liability on the driver as if the driver were to deliberately aim his or her vehicle at some pedestrians and chase them down the sidewalk.

    8. Re:low frequency and/or high frequency sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing whatever track they are listening to but time-delayed by a half a second works too. With upstairs neighbors, just turn up the heating. Warm air rises, and they are then forced to open the windows.

  9. It is long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to send the Marines into Cuba.

    1. Re:It is long past time by TWX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Marines never left. We still are using a large bay there.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:It is long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Do they need a holiday in the sun?

    3. Re:It is long past time by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Just leave the Army and Air Force out of it.... We don't need another bay of pigs..

      Oh, and by the way, we already are in Cuba... We've been there for a long, long time and are not leaving any time soon.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  10. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not saying the answer is yes, but if the terrorist attacks keep happening, maybe it's time to ask the question.

    Maybe it would be easier to round up the potential victims. They're generally law abiding, so they'll probably willing migrate to the daily search camp^H^H^H^H safety zone.

  11. Cicadas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On some ocasion I spent a night in a hotel in a small town and all the night long there was a cicada or another critter loudly buzzing a nasty sound like this. In the following days I realized that I had developed tinitus, that I carry since then. I don't know if it was a coincidence. Probably not.

    1. Re:Cicadas? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, maybe that wasn't a cicada but tinnitus.

    2. Re: Cicadas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a cicada or other critter definitely. It was not tinnitus. The sound was external.

    3. Re: Cicadas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like something a schizophrenic would say

  12. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously we need to loosen the definition of terrorism.

  13. How you know it's not the Cuban ruling class by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is egg on their face. It means that they cannot guarantee diplomatic safety in their own capitol, and if it's their own people doing it behind their back it means they cannot control their own intelligence services. Those are the sort of things that make a dictator get cold sweats at 2AM. It's a major crack in the facade of their power.

    Let's say that it turns out to be "The Russians" and we catch them in the act. The obvious solution for the Cubans is to let us take the foreign operatives back to the US. It would even be justifiable for the Cubans to arrest the diplomatic mission of the foreign power and turn them over to US. Diplomatic immunity my ass. Doing this to a foreign embassy is an act of war because it is extremely serious non-lethal violence against a diplomatic mission. All bets are off at that point.

    1. Re:How you know it's not the Cuban ruling class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck yes it's an act of war! I do not seek war but that's exactly what it is. Killing the messenger, these are diplomats. Russia protested removing their FLAGS.

    2. Re:How you know it's not the Cuban ruling class by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's almost like raising your children since birth bathed in Communism, to irrationally hate America as the source of all your troubles, is finally backfiring on them. And now that they're cozying up to the exact same enemy that has been blamed for every ill in their country, they have some rejectionists who finally have real-live American government in their reach. Whoda thunk it? Wow, that is a totally unexpected development!

      Nah, blame TEH ROOSHINS. It was them! It's worth a literal act of war, one that TEH ROOSHINS were desperately trying to stave off, in order to stop the US from dominating a country they were obviously always going to dominate.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  14. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2

    Obviously we need to loosen the definition of terrorism.

    Pretty sure it's already looser than a 60-year-old whore.

  15. Natural Phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I suppose a natural source could produce a noise like this. The problem is that something that is high-frequency AND has enough amplitude to do damage would be extremely directional. You would probably still hear something off-axis or reflected, but at a much lower amplitude. An omni-directional signal powerful enough to do damage to a human at a distance would also be shattering windows.

    So you would have to assume that it's a natural phenomena that just happens to be emitting directly at embassy staff. The odds of this being natural start dropping off rather quickly.

    1. Re:Natural Phenomena by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The odds of this being natural start dropping off rather quickly.

      Of course... but we don't even have a *conjecture* about what sort of technology could have even done this. Given that there is vastly more about the universe that we don't know than what we don't know about human accomplishments, it seems far more likely to me to be a natural phenomenon than the result of human intervention.

      Either that... or aliens. Take your pick.

    2. Re: Natural Phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My pick is that you don't know your head from Uranus.

      But spreading your FUD won't likely stop soon, so I invite you to travel to Cuba.

      If it's a naturally occurring event, then you have nothing to worry about, right?

    3. Re:Natural Phenomena by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Well it could always be interference noises between some of the electronics they've installed at the embassy.

    4. Re:Natural Phenomena by skids · · Score: 2

      I suppose a natural source could produce a noise like this

      No, if a noise like this were observed by SETI, they'd suspect a reflected Earth signal, or go running to the newspapers.

      Not much in nature generates regularly spaced frequency peaks, which is why we use them in communication... they are easy to pick apart from the background noise.

    5. Re: Natural Phenomena by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Lightning is a naturally occurring event too... that doesn't mean I want to get struck by it.

      Please... nowhere have I suggested that this event, even if naturally caused, is harmless.

      As for spreading FUD... well.. the facts are that nobody actually knows what caused it or how. That's not FUD, that's the plain and simple truth.

    6. Re: Natural Phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying it was Martians. It could have been Venutians. I'm just saying we can't absolutely rule them out as suspects.

      -whataboutism.

    7. Re: Natural Phenomena by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You mistake my point... I'm suggesting that when dealing with something that you don't actually have any real explanation for, the *ONLY* way that you can reasonably assume, without any proof, that it actually was the work of an intelligent agent is to at the very least know of actual historical examples of intelligent agents in the real world doing exactly what you were trying to explain.

  16. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

    Technically, a significant number of Muslims are old white men.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  17. Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall 58 being killed in an attack claimed by ISIS just days ago.

    1. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a great mass shooting/terrorist attack. A white guy killing for ISIS - satisfies both left and right ideologues trying to make political points and inflame their hatreds.

    2. Re:Say what? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension fail.

    3. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      An attack carried out by a white guy with no ties to Islam or ISIS who spent years gambling and drinking and doing all sorts of not-even-remotely-muslim shit before snapping and murdering a bunch of people.

      You Trump-sucking retards need to give up trying to tie Las Vegas to ISIS and accept that white men commit mass murder in the US far more often than any terrorist organization ever will.

    4. Re: Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White men as a percentage of the population commit fewer mass murders than blacks or Latinos.

      slate article from October 6 2017 titled "Mass Shooters Arenâ(TM)t Disproportionately White"

  18. My dog took notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I played all 5 seconds of the YouTube link at very low volume and my dog jumped up from where he was lying down and began looking around the room with a "what the fuck was that" attitude.

  19. Close the embassy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It shouldn't have been reopened in the first place. Cuba continues to violate basic human rights on a massive scale. Political prisoners are still very common.

    We shouldn't be giving them credibility. This was a big mistake by the previous administration.

    1. Re:Close the embassy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize the hypocrisy of what you're saying right? The US imprisons roughly 1 in every 100 of its citizens, many of those are at least partly politically based (Nixon expanded the "War on Drugs" as a way of disrupting the Civil Rights movement and disenfranchising minorities). +5,000 people are killed per year while in/being taken into police custody (jails/prisons/arrests). While generally temporary mass arrests during protests are common. Also there are over 12 million arrests pear year, by some estimates 70% of the people in jail (prisons hold long term sentences) at any one time are not convicted of any crime. Sure Cuba has its issues, but their incarceration rate doesn't hold a candle to the US.

    2. Re:Close the embassy by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but it's not really Cuba's fault that the USA keeps all their political prisoners there.

  20. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And 80% of those gun related deaths are due to gang violence, obviously banning all gangs would solve that problem ;)

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_06.pdf

    And most of those gang deaths happen in a few cities, Washington DC, Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit, Oakland, banning those cities solves the problem too ;)

  21. Better recording here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The actual sound is very creepy, but its slightly under volume. You may need to adjust your speaker volume. At 3min the tones begin to oscillate a little causing a slightly dizziness. Be careful. https://youtu.be/cyMHZVT91Dw?t=3m5s

  22. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually, 2/3s of those gun deaths are suicides, and about half of the remainder are gang related. A significant portion of the other half are police shootings, which leaves very few "innocent" gun related deaths.

  23. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of those were suicides. Not very apples-to-apples.

  24. Did Anybody Call MeTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We can roll the image, make it flutter. We can change the focus to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear. We repeat: there is nothing wrong with your television set. You are about to participate in a great adventure. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the inner mind to – The Outer Limits.

  25. In The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would a sonic weapon be protected under the 2nd or 1st amendment?

    1. Re:In The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would a sonic weapon be protected under the 2nd or 1st amendment?

      No, copyright law under the Berne Convention

    2. Re:In The US by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Would a sonic weapon be protected under the 2nd or 1st amendment?

      Yes.... And the 14th should you live in a state, not just a territory.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  26. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Mashiki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The number of Americans killed by guns in that "factoid" also includes suicide. Never mind that the mass shootings that are listed are primarily in poor black neighborhoods or anything. Obviously we need drug control too, so many people die from the wrong medication dosages and drug induced suicide every day that the opoid crisis is certainly to blame. 400,000 people die every year in the US from it. The opoid crisis is obviously the cause of all those deaths.

    Speaking of which, we're seeing exactly that same type of problem with gun violence in black neighborhoods here in Canada. But we don't see the same level of problem in say poor chinese, indian, or vietmanese neighborhoods. We don't even see this problem in native communities, and despite the money handed over via treaties(and it's a lot -- which many never see due to their own corruption). It's almost...almost like there's more going on here.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  27. Blame the Rolling Stones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone next door to the American embassy was playing the "Havana Moon" album too loudly.

  28. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A significant portion of the other half are police shootings, which leaves very few "innocent" gun related deaths.

    ... If you believe that the police only shoot guilty people. I'm not at all convinced of that, or even that most cases of a police officer drawing and using a firearm are justified given the circumstances. IIRC, police officers don't even make the top 10 of most dangerous professions in the USA, so their trigger happy attitude isn't really justified. Unless of course their job is relatively safe because they tend to shoot first.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  29. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Immerman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yep. For starters, we need to make it apply to white people too. Then that number would jump dramatically. Still be dwarfed by other gun deaths, but as I recall most of those are suicides, followed by accidents, followed by intentional murders over personal causes, none of which should qualify,

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  30. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    I think the GGP's numbers are way off in terms of shooting deaths; GP's link indicates 11,000-11,100 firearm related homicides per year, 19,300-19,800 firearm related suicides per year. (Interestingly, or not, roughly 5,000 "other" homicides per year.) Police shootings account for less than 500 deaths per year based on the best available information-- CDC data shows 258 in 2011 and 412 in 2010; Washington Post tracks 400 per year in the last few years.

    Another interesting tidbit-- if you look at total death rate by state, the highest rates are by far the rural states.

  31. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah but we should round up the musicians. Hurting people with sound seems to be their MO.

  32. Believed harmless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But now that you've listened to it, umm, what?

    Acoustic mind virus.

  33. Odds are it was a crappy listening or spy device. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The state department keeps calling this a "weapon", which doesn't make any sense. Listening devices and spying have a LONG history in embassies. The Russians were great at this in Moscow against the US, and the entire US embasy in Moscow had to be torn down and rebuilt because the Russians had infiltrated it. My guess is this thing was either transmitting information in some way and just completely miss-configured.

    The sound itself sounds modulated in some way. It's not a regular repeating pattern, or random noise. It varies in time. That's odd in itself, and suggests it's transmitting information.

  34. So they're not dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're still dead from suicide, then it's rather irrelevant if it's suicide. Unless suicides become immune to death or resurrect on a regular basis.

  35. Re:sounds like a laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess what the weapon is being used on me now

    Shitty weapon then... your are still alive... and shitposting.

  36. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

    Another interesting tidbit, related to your last tidbit: if you look at gun ownership by state, the highest rates by far are also rural states.

  37. This is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are they recording a sound with "extreme volume" without clipping or anything? This is all very suspicious.

    1. Re:This is bullshit by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      The extreme volume is at an inaudible frequency. What you're hearing in the recording would be a audible resonance frequency of that inaudible frequency. The relative power of resonance frequencies drop off pretty fast.

  38. You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone exhorts others to violence by stoking the fires of fear and anger, NOT silencing them will only allow the riot to continue. It's why you arrested several Imams in the USA and why you block things like ISIS and other muslim fundamentalist propaganda sites.

    1. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why is Antifa allowed to conduct its activities freely? How many riots have there been in the past 12 months? It used to be that a riot in the mainland USA would be a shocking thing. But now? They're so common I can't even tell you how many there have been this month, much less this year. All of them freely organized by people exhorting others to violence by stoking the fires of fear and anger.

    2. Re:You're wrong. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I certainly did not do this, nor vote for anyone who signed off on this crap. Try spouting off extremist Islamic crap in the USA and you are just going to be even more hated, it actually does the opposite and ignites fear and anger against them. Direct calls for violence are not protected under free laws, but that wouldn't stop someone like yiannopolous from speaking.

    3. Re:You're wrong. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Counter protests are quite American and should continue. However if things turn out badly, only the perpetrators of actual crimes should be arrested. This grouping up and arresting everyone, often starting with journalists and observers using recording equipment, and often with bogus charges, is some seriously facist crap that needs to be shut down yesterday.

  39. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather we round up internet trolls like yourself.

  40. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by fropenn · · Score: 1

    The "neighborhood factor," if there is really such a thing, doesn't really matter because gun control works in all neighborhoods: https://www.vox.com/policy-and...

  41. Why are Repugs such fucking fraidy cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm skeeeeeered of Muslims!! I'm skeeeeeered of Mexicans!!

    1. Re: Why are Repugs such fucking fraidy cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're so brave, go to Saudi Arabia, or Iran, or Central Mexico, and show us.

    2. Re: Why are Repugs such fucking fraidy cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I go into the lion's den, asshole?

      How about you, chickenshit? How about stepping outside your own fucking front door?

      You're afraid of them no matter where you are - even in your own country.

      How about you man up and grow a pair?

    3. Re: Why are Repugs such fucking fraidy cats? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Why would I go into the lion's den, asshole?

      Why wouldn't you? They're such great people, no reason to fear them, why wouldn't you go there? What's stopping you?

    4. Re: Why are Repugs such fucking fraidy cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I'm sure the vast majority of them are great people. However, it isn't within my own country's borders, under our own laws and security.
      That should be quite fucking obvious, stupid ass. Within out own borders, they've been vetting coming in.

      Howzabout you? Within your own country's borders you can't even go out your own front door without running around, sucking your thumb, like a little fraidy cat. Did you grow a pair yet?

      No wonder the rest of the US ignores the far right. You had your chance, and now your prez is failing. He can't get anything done.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go out and buy some fireworks. I need to prepare for the celebration. The way I see it, he'll either resign in huminiation, or he'll be assassinated.

      I'm still trying to determine which I would prefer.

  42. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than 200,000 Americans KILLED THEMSELVES LAST YEAR WITH A GUN.

    Your stats are a bloody lie.

  43. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still not nearly enough, perhaps we could get Trump to offer discount funerals for those willing to suicide themselves, or some other such incentive.

  44. Re:sounds like a laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    youre nuts. this is real. yours is not.
    how do you know youre nuts ? because energy is dissipated through atmosphere, laser or not.

  45. If I remember correctly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US and I believe even Russia experimented with sonic weapons for quite a while during the Cold War, nothing really came of it. All of the known systems are large, obvious & pretty ineffective. Sure you can kill/badly injure someone with sound, with a device the size of a Buick, at ranges of no more than 100' & sustained exposure. Or you could use a device the size of a large beer can launched from a mile away with a simple metal tube (mortar using either standard or chemical warheads). Which of the following three scenarios sounds more likely, a small and poor island nation developed a weapon two superpowers couldn't, some people (either government or independent) went out of their way to haul around a massive sonic device to attack an embassy, or some people are vastly overstating a minor incident for political gain.

    1. Re:If I remember correctly by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Or ghosts are real and Castro is pi$$ed.

  46. Sound at Youtube? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I couldn't hear a thing despite turning my speakers up.

  47. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by pots · · Score: 1

    Deaths from suicide are usually included in that figure because people who attempt suicide using guns are much more often successful than those who use other means (like sleeping pills). So easy access to guns results in more deaths from suicide.

  48. Unintentional. This noise is from jury-rigging. by davide+marney · · Score: 1

    See, we all think those commies are soo much smarter than we are, they have devised a sonic "weapon" that even our best experts can't explain.

    Here, let me try.

    This is the sound of jury-rigging. If you've got not parts, and no money, and no normal source for repairs, you just put stuff together as best you can. This particular noise is the sound of a fan scraping a trash-can lid that washed up on shore 20 years ago. /sarc

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
  49. Sonic Nausea device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.scamstuff.com/products/sonic-nausea

  50. Isn't that Jim Carey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Dumb and Dumber? The most annoying sound ever?

  51. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So 208 thousand out of 26.2 million deaths in America from all causes. High five, that's actually pretty good.

  52. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by rhazz · · Score: 2

    Speaking of which, we're seeing exactly that same type of problem with gun violence in black neighborhoods here in Canada. But we don't see the same level of problem in say poor chinese, indian, or vietmanese neighborhoods.

    Given that Canada doesn't track racial statistics as they relate to crime very well (or at all in many cases), I'm going to have to see a citation for that.

  53. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo... how do you explain the crazy high rate of suicides in Japan who have just about no guns? They don't seem to have any problem with success.

  54. The bug looks like a cicada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During the day it records everything it hears. At night it retransmits everything but at an ultrasonic pitch. Either the bug has been damaged (tropical moisture) or two similar devices are interfering with each other.

  55. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Deaths from suicide are usually included in that figure because people who attempt suicide using guns are much more often successful than those who use other means (like sleeping pills). So easy access to guns results in more deaths from suicide.

    It's a shit way to make it look like guns are an actual cause of death. Suicide is suicide, it doesn't matter how it happens. It would be like blaming gravity for people who jump off a bridge/building. But look at the stats for how that breaks down under sex. It's mainly men who will use guns, or really any method to commit suicide via any violent/excessive method because they want a method that's successful. It's also one of the reasons why male suicide makes 70-80% of all figures, they're choosing a method that's final. Women on the other hand are most likely to use things like sleeping pills because there is a far higher purchase put on 'how they look' even after they're dead, that reduces the chance of a successful suicide.

    A person determined to commit suicide though it really doesn't matter, they'll use anything at hand.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  56. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Mashiki · · Score: 0, Troll

    Given that Canada doesn't track racial statistics as they relate to crime very well (or at all in many cases), I'm going to have to see a citation for that.

    Canada does, it's just suppressed by organizations because of political correctness. That's why we have things like the Gladue report, if you want the reports for Toronto you have to call them up and ask for the non-annualized statistics. Or you can simply pay attention to the media, which paint a picture of what's happening too.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  57. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Top 10 leading causes of death per group age:
    https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_injury_deaths_unintentional_injury_2015_1050w760h.gif

    Guns are always behind cars. Let's ban cars!

  58. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Except when it doesn't right? Keep in mind that you can "fix" crime statistics into different categories if you change the race of the offender. Something that's very popular in Chicago and Philly right now.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  59. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    Not to rain on your narrative, but the vast majority of deaths from guns are suicides (60.5%), not mass murders or single homicides. During the ten years from 2003 to 2012, the most recent year for which data are available, 313,045 persons died from firearm-related injuries in the United States. In 2012, 64% of gun deaths were suicides. Over the past 30 years, suicide has exceeded homicide even when firearm homicide rates were at their highest, and it was also the case for most of the twentieth century.

    http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122535

    This is not to take away from the fact that in the U.S. deaths and injury from firearms far outnumber those of other developed nations, or that guns are used in nearly 70% of all homicides in the U.S., but statistics need context to be accurately understood.

  60. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by budsetr · · Score: 1

    No, apply it to guns. If guns are terrorists....

  61. the Ring by budsetr · · Score: 1

    Don't listen to it! Seven days later you will die!

  62. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Gun control works in all neighborhoods"... LOL.

    Gun control doesn't work in "bad" neighborhoods. That's the problem. Thugs, who typically infest "bad" neighborhoods, buy stolen guns on the black market specifically to use in the commission of crimes. There's absolutely no reason to buy black market guns other than to commit crime.

    In "good" neighborhoods, the gun owners typically purchase their guns from a reputable dealer and get whatever needed licensing, registration, and background checks done as part of the purchase process.

    Obviously, this breaks down as "bad" = poor, "good" = not poor (but not always rich), when considering how those adjectives apply to various neighborhoods. Guess which neighborhoods have hideously-high gun crime rates. Hint: it's not the "good" ones. It's never the "good" ones. The "good" neighborhoods are always shocked by a gun crime, while the "bad" neighborhoods only get on the news when there's a mass-slaughter, and they always interview some long-time resident that says, basically, "gunshots are an everyday occurrence around here, but never like this".

    The reason "black lives matter" has become a catchphrase of late is because so many crimes happen to black people in these poor neighborhoods that everyone collectively stopped paying attention to it and began to simply expect it to happen. Like "the sky is blue" or "bears shit in the woods", so is "black people shoot the ever-loving fuck out of each other in the ghetto". Eventually, even the police stopped paying attention and simply didn't respond anymore to incidents in those areas where this happens a lot, because, hey, they're government employees, they don't get paid enough to go into harm's way to sort this shit out if it's just going to happen again and again. BLM isn't about people thinking black people are worthless. It's about people being lazy and not coming to the aid of other people in violent neighborhoods. Skin color is secondary, and is really not even the point. BLM could just as easily be called "Poor Lives Matter" or "Violence-marred Lives Matter" or "People Are Fucking Sick Of Being Stuck In A Hellhole, Both Physically And Economically, With No Way Out" or, simply, "We're Despondent And Desperate, PLEASE FUCKING HELP US, ASSHOLES".

    As you can see, "gun control" is just another non-fix for a deeply broken system that allows politicians to ignore the real places where they've failed to govern effectively.

  63. Seriously? by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There could never be any plausible malicious intent by people in Cuba against U.S. Embassy personnel. There's just no precedent and no motive.

    The Cuban people were NOT indoctrinated for years to view U.S. Government entities as their enemy. There is NO possibility that rogue elements within Cuban society might be doing this 'For Fidel' out of ideological zeal.

    Nope. None of that should even be considered.

    I'm pretty sure they US public has been more thoroughly indoctrinated to view Cuba as the spawn of Satan by the US media than the Cuban government could ever hope to indoctrinate the Cuban people to view the US as a mere 'enemy'. I attribute this largely to the fact that the average Cuban is better educated and generally better informed than the average American.

    I really just wish that Americans would figure out how to associate government actions with the government, and not condemn the country or people in it for the actions of their government. Your statement that the American public views Cuba as evil is surprising to me, because I don't think that at all. That may happen for some countries, like North Korea where things are a bit more extreme. But Cuba? I don't see it.

    And I sure as hell hope that people in the rest of the world don't judge all Americans based on what our government does and says.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really just wish that Americans would figure out how to associate government actions with the government, and not condemn the country or people in it for the actions of their government. Your statement that the American public views Cuba as evil is surprising to me, because I don't think that at all. That may happen for some countries, like North Korea where things are a bit more extreme. But Cuba? I don't see it.

      And I sure as hell hope that people in the rest of the world don't judge all Americans based on what our government does and says.

      What a minute, you think all North Koreans are evil? I can hear millions of dead, tortured North Koreans turning in their graves. You insensitive (clod) hypocrite.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Your statement that the American public views Cuba as evil is surprising to me, because I don't think that at all.

      Depends on who you hang out with. Wander around Florida, or anywhere else that the Cuban expat community has settled, and you'll find that to be pretty common.

      Also, older people who formed their political opinions during the Cold War are more likely to think this too. The USSR really was Satan in the minds of the US for a long time, and Cuba was commonly seen as their proxy arm in the Caribbean.

    3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I sure as hell hope that people in the rest of the world don't judge all Americans based on what our government does and says.

      I hate to break it to you, but they do.

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Either the government represents the people, or

      2. it no longer represents the people, which is a huge problem.

  64. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what, 56 a year. I think there are about 50 per year killed by lightning too.
    Were you trying to make a point, or just throwing out random numbers?

  65. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    350,408: number of Americans killed by Automobiles in the last decade

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year

  66. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you suggesting that removing guns in the US would lower suicide rates?

  67. Allow the Cubans a little craftiness, please . . . by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    I've known more than a few intelligent Cuban-Americans (except for Otto Reich, whom I don't know), so allow those still back on the island a little leeway please. If they used concentrated bursts of directed microwave transmissions (something the old Soviets were researching back in the 1960s) along with those sounds, people might tend to believe the sounds were the cause and not look for any microwave sources.

  68. So it is not microwaves then? Then it's nonsence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only plausible (sort of) physical theory so far was that it were micro-waves. That is, something that can penetrate the building and produce sensations of sound in people it is aimed at, but stay inaudible to the rest of the World.

    Now that it IS sound (otherwise how could it be recorded?) the whole thing just doesn't make sense when you consider the buidling and its location. Look it up on Google maps - where would you put the emitter capable of penetrating the buidling with sound while being discreet? Wherever you try, it would be very loud on the outside which as we're told is not the case.

  69. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the real question:

    How many of those werent either A) suicides or B) blacks and mexicans offing each other in the streets?

    And dont bring up poverty. The really poor are the hillbillies in WV and EKY and they arent duking it out like savages.

  70. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by mikael · · Score: 1

    They sorted this problem out in East Menlo Park by asking the local research groups (NASA?) if they could do anything. They came up with a "gunshot detector" which triangulated or quadratulated the location of the shot and the type of weapon. Everything from someone clapping their hands, a car backfiring or a real gunshot could be identified.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  71. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The south side of chicago is no more poor than VW, EKY or various places in the south that dont have this problem. The problem is these people are fucking animals and theyre allowed to be, and are getting worse.

  72. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by rhazz · · Score: 2

    Canada does, it's just suppressed by organizations because of political correctness.

    So if the data is suppressed (and your article confirms it is not collected at all in some jurisdictions), how do you know there is a trend of gun violence specifically in poor black neighbourhoods, but not in other racial categories? Personally I think Canada likely has similar, if less inflamed, issues as the US in terms of racial disparity and over-representation in criminal statistics simply because CA/US cultures aren't that far apart. However I find claims of specific trends lack credibility without actual data to back it up. I would love if we had actual public data on this so we could try to address issues that might exist.

    Or you can simply pay attention to the media, which paint a picture of what's happening too.

    No, there is too much bias in media. I take trends in media as trends in what people are interested in at the time. When I see an uptick in articles about police killing unarmed black civilians, I don't assume this is suddenly happening more often, only that people are suddenly more interested in those stories.

  73. Secret super-sonic weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    attacking Americans in their sleep. It's so hilariously bad you couldn't even fit it in a 50's B-movie.

  74. sounds to me like a metal lathe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    without the sound of the motor.

    Just the high pitch of the bit cutting into metal.

  75. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by pots · · Score: 2

    It would be like blaming gravity for people who jump off a bridge/building.

    More like blaming a lack of guard rails. The point is not that having easy access to guns makes suicide possible, yes of course if someone is really determined they can always find a way to kill themselves, the point is that having lots of guns lying around makes suicide quick and easy.

    The difference between someone who is dead and someone who had a brief but intense episode of depression is sometimes a matter of convenience - how easy is it for them to kill themselves in that moment?

  76. Location, Location, Location. by Whibla · · Score: 1

    The thing that surprised me most about this whole affair was that no-one seems to have modified a gunfire location system to see where these sounds originated.

    I understand that ensuring the safety of your diplomatic staff is of primary concern but, given the US's traditional response to threats, I'd have expected a 'squad' of marines or a pair of men in dark glasses knocking on the door of room 623 in the overlooking office block* within a week of 'hearing' the sounds.

    *An example. Not the actual location of the origin of the sounds, as far as I know...

    1. Re:Location, Location, Location. by burtosis · · Score: 2

      You couldn't use a similar setup because it's highly unlikely the sound was omnidirectional like a gunshot. All your sound sensors would pick up near silence. Plus if it was a constant and consistent sound that wouldn't work from a timed location perspective either. You could probably determine a direction, if you had actual gear at the location where it was focused.

    2. Re:Location, Location, Location. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The problem with that whole idea is that sound doesn't behave like laser light.

      This is what the experts keep saying every time the press bothers to even talk to them. Most of the experts in the field say that what the US Gov says is happening is simply not possible because sound doesn't behave like that. And 98% of these stories never even bother to ask sound experts and instead take everything the government is saying at face value.

      I'll tell you one thing for sure, this focus on sound attacks has eclipsed all the real possibilities like biological or chemical causes. There are hundreds of chemicals and viruses that could cause the exact same symptoms.

    3. Re:Location, Location, Location. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      The problem with that whole idea is that sound doesn't behave like laser light.

      Actually sound does behave like light, when you look at it by normalizing the wavelength difference. Directional audio gear like this one from lrad can operate a fairly tight beam, with higher frequencies being easier to focus. Both biological and chemical sources would leave a trace of thier presence, and while we could be lied to, if you take reports at face value, sound seems the likely vector.

  77. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that Black Lives Matter doesnâ(TM)t focus on the 8000 Black on Black murders per year, they focus on the 25 unarmed blacks killed by police each year. It seems they need to reprioritize.

  78. Re:So it is not microwaves then? Then it's nonsenc by sexconker · · Score: 1

    You put a dozen focused emitters in various locations and point them at your target, syncing them up for constructive interference.

  79. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know in 2016, 52.6% of US homicides were committed by n i g g e r s?
    https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-21

  80. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by anegg · · Score: 1

    The score (from http://www.politifact.com/trut...) as of 2015...counts deaths of Americans in America: 24: number of Americans killed by terrorism in the last decade 208,024: number of Americans killed by guns in the last decade

    Number of Americans killed by automobiles in the last decade (as of 2016): 350,408. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year

  81. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, whatever statistics show, your country is a fucking warzone, isn't it?

  82. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So clueless

  83. Hint from Hungary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cuban sonic weapon crisis and the US government's crusade against Kaspersky Lab of Russia are closely related.

  84. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely true. I've always been haunted by this article in the New Yorker about the very things you describe.

  85. Ultrasound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don’t understand the mystery here. Seems like a simple unltrasound attach to me. They have been beaming sound on not people’s heads for years.

  86. ...here via youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone filed a dmca takedown notice yet ?

  87. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Americans killed by guns in recorded history: 0

    Is that like that philosopher who insisted that nobody was killed by a sword, they died from not avoiding the sword?

    Here's a shock for you, guns do kill people.

    On a side note, concealed carry warning and brandishing probably stops that many robberies, rapes and murders in a week...

    Because...you must think that attempted robberies, rapes, and murders are so common that there are thousands a week! What kind of crime-ridden world of fear do you live in?

    Americans killed by medical mistakes each year: about 250,000

    And we've got a whole group of people arguing about that problem too!

    Americans killed by antibiotic resistant bacteria each year: 23,000

    Also discussed.

    Clearly guns are not that big a threat unless you are an alt left fascist progressive looking to dominate and subjugate the American people.

    Nope, guns are a big threat to the American people, what with deaths from toddlers with guns, whereas imaginary fears of alt-left fascist progressives looking to dominate and subjugate the American people aren't a threat at all, except so insofar as they lead right-wing pseudo-conservative trolls to instigate feigned outrage in America.

    Every dictator in the last 100 years from Stalin to Mao on down the line disarmed their people first and then murdered millions of them.

    Nope. In fact, many dictators armed their people, then told them to go forth and kill "not their people" because well, that's a great way for dictators to keep power.

    You must not be familiar with history.

    Guns are in fact inanimate objects controlled by their wielder, which is why every LEO in the country carries one.

    Guns, are in fact, tools that ought to be regulated like many other tools, such as lawnmowers, chainsaws, pressure washers, and nail guns, and no, not every LEO in the country carries one. For example. And some shouldn't.

    Any group that uses "gun deaths" are political shills with no interest in truth.

    I wonder if you realize that group includes yourself.

    Gun deaths usually include suicides (who just use different methods in gun free countries), criminals shot by police or citizens, and other justified shootings that are actually a good thing for society and end up saving lives.

    Nope, actually, they're not using different methods, the suicide rates are often lower, self-defense and other justified shootings are excluded from the counts though actually...the number of such shootings is a problem, not even counting the various incidents.

    Sorry, I know you don't want there to be any problem except not having enough bullets for all those dirty leftists who you hate with all you

  88. John Wick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that you? I once saw you kill three men in a bar with a pencil, a fucking pencil! Who the fuck can do that?

    1. Re:John Wick... by Matheus · · Score: 1

      Sshhhh... they killed my fucking dog man... >:-(

  89. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    It might also be worth mentioning, then, that legal access to assisted suicide would reduce gun deaths by up to a third. Take a few other easy steps toward a better society (better social safety net, worthwhile education, fair economic opportunities, etc) and I think you could knock off another third.

  90. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind that you can "fix" crime statistics into different categories if you change the race of the offender. Something that's very popular in Chicago and Philly right now.

    Like it Texas? You know, where the police tried to conceal their own malfeasance? Horrors!

    Sorry, Mashiki, once again, you're suffering a mistaking of facts.

    It's the police trying to hide their misconduct.

  91. I hear this all day, every day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called Tinnitus...

  92. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US is absolutely packed with tens of millions of white guys with guns and this is as bad as it gets.

    The US doesn't yet have tens of millions of Muslims. Wait until the Muslim population is at 20% and they think it's finally time to take over in the name of their satanic pedophile prophet.

    The rates of deaths will sky rocket. The US will collapse into civil war or anarchy and it'll look just like the modern day Middle East.

    Welcome to your Muslim inspired future.

  93. From Russia, with love by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I'm more inclined to believe that it's another state-actor or else a very, very large criminal enterprise, something on the international scale.

    Of course it is a state actor. Also it seems very clear that it is probably a false flag op trying to create friction between Cuba and the US. Lets think about this: In recent years there are has been a considerable thawing of relations between the US and Cuba. Previously, it was a Soviet friendly country right off the coast of the US. If Cuba suddenly becomes A BFF with the US, what do you think happens to relations with Russia?

    Moreover, Putin has signed off on outlandish 'James Bond' operations before. (Poisoning a journalist with radioactive material, conducing false flag terrorist bombings, etc.). Using exotic ultrasonic weapons to deafen embassy personnel sound like something right out of his playbook.

    Police detectives look for motives when working on a case. I'd say Putin has a pretty good motive to keep US - Cuba relations on ice.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  94. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you are.

  95. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does a hick in NC trying to blow up an airport count? Because that literally just happened.

  96. Witch Hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's literally no mechanism by which sound waves could do the damage they claim has occurred without absolutely massive sound generating equipment being used pretty much right on top of the embassy.

    My guess is that either some other environmental factor is to blame, or even more likely that the panic over this supposed phenomenon is causing people to go to the doctor and actually get a hearing test, only to discover that like most people, they suffer from some age-related hearing loss they didn't know they had, only reinforcing their paranoid suspicions.

    I'm just surprised the doctors are stupid enough to go along with this farce.

  97. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the acceptable number of unarmed people being killed by the cops? It seems every couple of weeks there is video of yet another black guy being shot for no particularly reasonable reason. And every month or so we see a white person acting aggressively crazily, charging a cop and knocking them down then trying to steal a squad car just this month alone, and not being shot by cops.

    The question is why does the white guy not get shot but the black guy does. It's a rhetorical question, we already know the answer.
    Because he's black.

  98. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most suicides attempts are momentary lapses in impulse control. If it were extensively premeditated, people would wear diapers to control bowel release, and do it on a plastic sheet in the tub to not make a mess, or dig a hole in the woods and rig up a dump for quick burial.

    So yeah, guns make it easy to successfully commit suicide. The easiest way there is. Point and click. Done. Usually. Sometimes you bleed out slowly, or are just brain damaged. Reducing gun availability makes it harder to commit suicide. Suicidal losers are brain damaged or lazy and unsuccessful, hence suicidal nature. Make it harder and they'll give up. One more thing they are not good at.

  99. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a discriminatory and offensive thing to say about sex workers and is also age discrimination. I'm offended. I will be reporting you to the Terrorism Hotline.

  100. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea. It's a case of charging a cop and trying to steal a squad car while black.

  101. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "killed by guns" guns are dead object, gun can not kill anyone.

  102. What about Russia? by Contract+Gypsy · · Score: 0

    The first reports of these attacks were in Russia, against US dignitaries. That was like two months ago so why has the media forgotten about that? Oh, that's right, that wouldn't make sense in the media created Trump is in bed with Putin stories! (Not that he is or isn't)

    --
    Life is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, it both blows and sucks
  103. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starting with you, stupid sand monkey

  104. Sounds remind of ultrasonic cleaners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These sounds are "ringers" for ultrasonic jewelry cleaners. What we hear may be the audible component of a powerful wave (in person, not via a speaker) whose harmonics may be of great harm to resonant microstructures in the human anatomy: for the inner ear, for fine cerebral capillaries, anything the operator may wish to destroy. I nearly flipped when I heard the sound from my ultrasonic cleaner-- what lurks in the higher harmonics. See concept of the Harmonic Gun in Alfred Bester's The Demolished Man.

  105. Re: Is it time to round up the muslims? by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Ban gangs in cities; only gang farmers should be allowed.

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  106. Nature's War on Americans.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a cicada to me.

  107. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of which, we're seeing exactly that same type of problem with gun violence in black neighborhoods here in Canada. But we don't see the same level of problem in say poor chinese, indian, or vietmanese neighborhoods.

    Given that Canada doesn't track racial statistics as they relate to crime very well (or at all in many cases), I'm going to have to see a citation for that.

    rhazz ... you must live in Toronto - and take it to be template for the entire Universe. In Vancouver, a lot of gun violence tends to revolve around drug gangs in the Indo-Canadian community, as there are very few black people in this neck of the woods.

  108. Ever hear of an LRAD? by iq145 · · Score: 1

    "Sound experts and physicians say they know of no sound that can cause physical damage", but there is indeed one that the japanese use on a regular basis against my Sea Shepherd comrades! It's called the LRAD. The Long Range Acoustic Device's purpose is to make sound - lots of sound. It produces very loud sound that is audible over relatively long distances. But it's not limited to producing painful noise for use as a weapon which causes disorientation. It can also amplify voices or recordings to a level that is loud and clear but not painful or debilitating. It's usually used for "non-lethal, non-kinetic crowd control". https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  109. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    So if the data is suppressed (and your article confirms it is not collected at all in some jurisdictions), how do you know there is a trend of gun violence specifically in poor black neighbourhoods

    By paying attention. Something that most people don't do now. When the CBC is saying the same thing, there might, maybe, possibly, maybe, be something there.

    Or you can ignore it all, along with people saying the same thing. Take your pick.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  110. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    More like blaming a lack of guard rails.

    So when someone climbs a crossing, walks along a set of tracks, gets on a bridge and jumps onto the ground below it's because of a lack of guard rails? Brilliant. Fences everywhere then right? You'll be taking up collection along the grand canyon first I'm guessing.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  111. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by pots · · Score: 1

    So when someone climbs a crossing, walks along a set of tracks, gets on a bridge and jumps onto the ground below it's because of a lack of guard rails?

    This is an awfully specific bridge that you're talking about. Maybe it wasn't a very good analogy to begin with? Maybe when I said, "more like," I didn't mean, "exactly like"? Maybe you should read the rest of what I said instead of focusing on your own dumb analogy?

  112. Re:Is it time to round up the muslims? by MercTech · · Score: 1

    The last time the definition of terrorism was redefined it became so vague as to make very single civil rights spokesman from the 1960s into a terrorist.

    We actually need a succinct definition of "terrorist acts" so there is some standard for the term.

      Currently, you are a terrorist if you say " is an ignorant putz and should be removed from office, preferably in handcuffs at gunpoint." You become a terrorist for trying to influence a change in government policy by threatening violence.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT