Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Phone Companies Appear To Be Selling Your Location To Almost Anyone (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: You may remember that last year, Verizon (which owns Oath, which owns TechCrunch) was punished by the FCC for injecting information into its subscribers' traffic that allowed them to be tracked without their consent. That practice appears to be alive and well despite being disallowed in a ruling last March: companies appear to be able to request your number, location, and other details from your mobile provider quite easily. The possibility was discovered by Philip Neustrom, co-founder of Shotwell Labs, who documented it in a blog post earlier this week. He found a pair of websites which, if visited from a mobile data connection, report back in no time with numerous details: full name, billing zip code, current location (as inferred from cell tower data), and more. (Others found the same thing with slightly different results depending on carrier, but the demo sites were taken down before I could try it myself.)

149 comments

  1. There's no escaping it by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We ARE the product, and short of bloody revolution there's SFA we can do about it. Time to open that Facebook account I guess - the war has been lost, so I may as well get as much value as I can out of our corporate overlords in return for them raping my privacy.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re: There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is caused by all those pesky regulations. Verizon has been telling us for years that all we have to do is free their industry from regulations and they would immediately become more altruistic.

      Loosening those privacy rules would immediately make all this better. For one, they wouldn't been in violation of said rules anymore.

    2. Re:There's no escaping it by gnick · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Time to open that Facebook account I guess - the war has been lost...

      TFS talks about some information being made available to all bidders, but it doesn't NEARLY approach the information collected by FB. I am a FB user and I do have location services turned on. I see some creepy shit. It asked me about my trip to a place where I'd stopped in the parking lot on my way home from work. It offered a friend suggestion for a person I'd had no online interaction with, but sat down with that day at Starbucks for an hour. I can only imagine what they know about me that they're not sharing.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:There's no escaping it by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or enjoy playing with them. Poison their data well. Create false information about yourself. Get creative and have exciting new hobbies. Have fun with it and explore the exiting world of being a product. Create a mail address for every possible occasion where you might need one and watch how it travels through the various places. Respond to their "quality assurance" test and enter as much false information as you can. Create 2, 3, 10 personas and let them gain a rich and interesting life. One of mine is for example a freeclimber and has shared many photos on instagram of his travels around the world. Google pix helps. Of course, photoshop it sufficiently to thwart algorithms trying to match it with the original. That's fairly easy and can be done by laymen by now. Create new and exciting landscapes in your back yard!

      Not all is lost, and you can have a lot of fun duping corporations into trashing their data hive with your fakes. I don't know about you, but it sure entertains me to see corporations believe in the existence of a person that only exists in my head.

      Maybe it's time to create a webpage dedicated to showing off how you could dupe data collectors into believing your forgeries.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to open that Facebook account I guess [...] I may as well get as much value as I can [...]

      What value?

      I've been a member for almost 10 years, and have wasted countless hours there - but I'd be hard pressed to name value. Perhaps some personal interaction with people and interest groups that otherwise would have to use {{gasp}} e-mail?

    5. Re:There's no escaping it by Sporkinum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got an ad on facebook for an anti snoring aid. I did not say anything about that on facebook, nor did I shop for anything like that. The only way it would know such things is that it monitors the microphone on the phone. The facebook "lite" app I installed a couple of months ago was promptly removed from my phone.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    6. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Verizon also sells accelerometer data. I never get telemarketer calls when not handling the phone, but if I leave it idle for an hour or two and then pick it up there's at least a 50% chance of getting one before the phone gets into my pocket.

    7. Re:There's no escaping it by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      You're just creating a data set to train distinguishing real vs fake profiles.

      Sure you might avoid the bullet for a few years, but the value of a clearly real profile goes up, and soon they can guess which parts if you are real.

      Better to hide as much as possible. Turn off, as in pop the battery of, your phone when not in use.

    8. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      raping my privacy.

      No means yes. She likes it in the butt anyway

    9. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ideas are interesting. This is time spent though.

      More proof of what a hideous tumor FB and social media in general can be to humanity.

    10. Re:There's no escaping it by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe snoring is so common that the makers of this aid just did as they did in the old days - they sent the ad to everyone?

      Not ALL ads are completely tailor-made to each individual user.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    11. Re:There's no escaping it by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      nor did I shop for anything like that [emphasis mine]

      Does your wife use your computer? Which leads me to a good idea.... I should start searching for anti-snoring stuff on my wife's login, maybe she'd take a hint.

    12. Re:There's no escaping it by snarfies · · Score: 2

      I escaped it.

      I purchased a phone that could be rooted, and did so. Then I installed xPrivacy.

      xPrivacy feeds false location information to all apps on the phone. So far as all of my apps are concerned I am standing on Chistmas Island. Similarly, I am also feeding my apps false advertising IDs and false phone ID numbers.

    13. Re:There's no escaping it by fleeped · · Score: 1

      That's a great (?) way to waste time. Personally I have better things to do with my life than playing hide and seek. Or running to the wilderness for guaranteed privacy. And by better things I don't mean Facebook of course.

    14. Re:There's no escaping it by ljw1004 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It offered a friend suggestion for a person I'd had no online interaction with, but sat down with that day at Starbucks for an hour.

      I bet that friend got home and looked you up on Facebook to see more about you, browse through your photos etc. And that if they look you up, then they get suggested to you as a friend.

    15. Re:There's no escaping it by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Your ISP still sells all of your identifying info, so the big companies know that all of those characters are the same person.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    16. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything. Any computer engineer or DBA worth their weight in gold will tell you. But you have to have the data filled in. The data doesn't have to be verified per-say. This can be done via scrapping the entire internet. Or purchasing (as its mentioned) data on "customers". Then this can be parsed and added to a new table or database. Then pooled into a larger store.

      You build a network out of that. Keep it internal and viola. I can then:

      1. Tell you where you were 5 min ago.
      2. If you ate something, purchased something, thought of going to the movies, thought of going on vacation.
      3. Where you were thinking of going on vacation. Which movies you thought of going to see.

      Snowden mentioned this stuff. He did state the government doesn't care. BUT. The marketing world and the various companies who purchase the data do. Because then they can get more of your money via selected advertising.

      It doesn't mean the government is utilizing that info. However, lets say you get investigated for a minor crime years later. That data is then sitting there to be pilifered.

      If we have to live with it. Then there should be a team that is setup (hopefully that isn't going to take bribes) in addition to new regulatory laws that states within 1 month your data is deleted and purged. That gives marketers the time they should have to get you to purchase something. After that the team verifies with checks that your data has actually been deleted. And I mean with 1s being written over the data at least 15-20 times. Not some sloppy "quick format" since that just pushes all the 1s to 0s. Which *can* be recovered. - Via recovery services or even simple windows commands.

      Its not nefarious. The data can be used in various ways. You have to trust the people with the data. Would you trust your mom, dad, sister, brother, uncle with the data? Keep in mind what Snowden stated is also true. He had family in the FBI. He trusted this family. You can be paranoid about it all you want. The simple truth is that data can be abused but is your close friend going to go poking around in it? If so, then maybe you should re-think the type people you surround yourself. Mine wouldn't do that.

    17. Re:There's no escaping it by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Oh, I actually only create fake profiles. I, myself, don't exist. At least as far as Facebook, Twitter and all the others are concerned.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:There's no escaping it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's entertaining. Sure, setup is a bit of a bore, but it's creative. Some paint, some sculpt, I create profiles. It's fun and we're a really awesome shared house by now, though Melissa is currently sick with the flu. We're all very worried, last night the fever went really high.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:There's no escaping it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Where does my ISP get the info from where I go from the VPNs and TOR?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zuckerburg knows when you masterbate.

    21. Re:There's no escaping it by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      We ARE the product, and short of bloody revolution there's SFA we can do about it. Time to open that Facebook account I guess - the war has been lost, so I may as well get as much value as I can out of our corporate overlords in return for them raping my privacy.

      If it were really so hopeless why would cell companies bother trying to scrub the evidence from the Internet? They were obviously AFRAID of something.

      Do you not get a monthly bill from your cellular provider? You could just not pay it and instead take your business elsewhere. Consumers have all of the power in the world to affect change... assuming they are sufficiently motivated to get off their assess and stop crying about something they have the power to change.

      Besides creating overlay networks on top of IP is trivially easy. You could for example run TOR on your mobile or find/create a VPN service you have some reason to trust.

      It has never been easier for people all over the world to communicate privately. There has never been a time where so much source code and tools necessary to run, modify and create every aspect of modern computers and sophisticated cryptography have been freely available to anyone wishing to pursuit them. Bandwidth and computers have never been cheaper or more available. How much easier does it have to get?

    22. Re: There's no escaping it by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      This is probably the correct answer. I asked my wife if she mentioned me snoring in a message to her friends,and she's said no. Regardless, the add creeped me out enough that it was the nudge i needed to delete the app and go over my account to look for leaks. A couple of minor things needed tweaked,but for the most part is pretty clean.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    23. Re:There's no escaping it by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      We can start by not electing shitheads like Trump who cripple the FCC and suck the telecoms dicks.

    24. Re:There's no escaping it by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 0

      paranoid much?

    25. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were at a cafe and my wife mentioned something about this Mall opening near home. Next time she checks her smartphone, there it is the Mall ad. Her phone was hearing the conversation all along. Happened two days ago.

      We are screwed.

    26. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The data doesn't have to be verified per-say.

      It is per se, meaning 'for itself'.

    27. Re:There's no escaping it by ebyrob · · Score: 2

      Where does my ISP get the info from where I go from

      Read TFA. From your cell phone vendor and geolocating your ISP, wifi hangouts etc. You may post pictures of rock climbing the Himalayas but they can see you doing it from your living room. (In your boxers if you have a web-cam, probably even if it's disabled in bios...)

    28. Re: There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's false. As long as the FCC continues to make broadband spectrum artificially scarce and allocate it to the highest bidder and to wasteful users, we will never be free from the abuse of cellular monopolies.

      Consumers have no choice when there aren't any alternatives. You're obviously a shill.

      We can either:

      A. Make it easy to start competitive cellular providers by using an open access model for radio communications so consumers actually have choice, or
      B. Regulate cellular providers.

    29. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so stealing this idea. I actually like the sound of her snoring when I'm sleeping or trying to sleep, but if I'm trying to watch TV and can't hear what people are saying, I'm all nudge, nudge, disturb, nudge.

    30. Re:There's no escaping it by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      Welcome to 2017. Paranoid not enough?

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    31. Re: There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking to Percy, not you. Apparently there's no privacy here either.

    32. Re:There's no escaping it by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      You're aware that just by following cell-tower protocols you're uniquely identifiable and trackable right? The cell network knows which towers you're connected to and the command sets are insecure and built to give control to the phone companies. Unless you're carrying around 10 different burn-phones and swapping them all out daily you're definitely still trackable.

      You may have raised the bar just a bit for random website X to track you, but it's hardly a hiccup to your phone carrier.

      Note: The X-UIDH header discussed in the article is injected into any HTTP request by the cell network before it hits the web. HTTPS may help a bit but it's no guarantee.

    33. Re:There's no escaping it by DogDude · · Score: 2

      They tie together your IP address, MAC address, time and date, along with all of the info from Google and Apple and Amazon and Facebook.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    34. Re: There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My weight in gold is $3096532.34. I'm not "worth" that currently :(

    35. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know what? You are an ABJECT COWARD. While you're knuckling under to companies that bully you like this, some of us are fighting for our RIGHT TO PRIVACY. Why don't you stop being such a pussy and fight back any way you can? Or do you care so little for everyone else that you're just going to give these fucking bastards exactly what they want without a fight?

    36. Re:There's no escaping it by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      How does my ISP know how many people live in my house? They only know I exist, because I pay the bill; they might have some idea that my wife exists, but they don't know whether Tulip and Blue are my cats or my kids.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    37. Re:There's no escaping it by WolfgangVL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Recognizing snoring seems like some perfect entry level tasking for phones and "assistants" There is quite a bit of valuable data to be gleaned from doing so.

      Watch tv before you sleep? What channel? (Demographics info)
      What time do you usually go down? (Scheduling/location)
      Are there more than one of you? (Relationship status)
      Breathing patterns and snoring (Health status)
      Presence of animals (Pet info)

      Each of these points is worth something to somebody, and that's just the top of the head stuff. It's also all pretty repetitive noises sampled every night, so simple for automated detection and such, so no real reason not to do something like this.

      A few years from now, the shocking amount of data these things collect, correlate, corroborate, and index on everybody (not just the owner) is going to come out. It will barley even register on the outrage scale, there will be some congressional hearings, the big data merchants will answer some questions delivered in a stern voice, and nothing will change.

      tl;dr=There's no money in NOT listening to you sleep.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    38. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile Facebook has a shadow profile of you and all it needs is one acquaintance, family member, or childhood friend to link that shadow profile to a contact with your name, address and phone number and they've got all they need.
      You may never go on Facebook but eventually that info will drop into Google's hands and they'll link it to the shadow profile they're keeping on you and sell it all.

    39. Re:There's no escaping it by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Escape is simple. Don't use a mobile phone.

      You can get along just fine without it. Remember what it was like to enjoy things with all of your attention?

      You too can really be *done* with work at 5pm, just like your boss.

      Privacy is still a thing, you just have to want it.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    40. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Try doing a search sometime on your own name or your spouse or kids. Among the scores of pay sites you'll see listings that give just a hint of what they've found.
      I see records of every place I've ever lived, prior to the Internet going back decades. Same for my wife and kids. About the only truly anonymous one in my house seems to be my cat...s**t no I see here PET-Meds must be selling information too.

    41. Re:There's no escaping it by Whibla · · Score: 1

      ...but they don't know whether Tulip and Blue are my cats or my kids.

      The former I hope!

    42. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because Hillary would have appointed a cable company insider instead of a telcom insider and then we'd be complaining about cable company overreach instead of telcom overreach.

    43. Re:There's no escaping it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Facebook might not know you want anti-snoring things. It could be that the people they are selling the advertisement to (on offer, an ad to Sporkinum, bid now) know you would be interested in it.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    44. Re:There's no escaping it by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I've been looking into randomly generating new faces, but that is turning out to be difficult. There are a few elements I can generate - but the face space of the resulting set is merely a million or so faces that are not clearly artificial.

      We need to get this work automated so that various figments of the script's imagination can interact with each other independently of us.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    45. Re:There's no escaping it by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck Batman! I always knew in the back of my mind that kind of thing was possible, but didn't really think about it too hard. Hearing your stories makes the whole 'opt-in for 24/7 surveillance' thing WAY creepier than I've always felt it to be. Thanks for sharing - guess I won't jump on that social networking bandwagon any time soon.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    46. Re: There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Melissa is an anti vaxxer ;) or Facebook would have sent her vaccine ads.

    47. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YOU are the product. Some of us know how to defend ourselves. For example, none of my data is accessible on the internet. If you search for me, you'll find a few people with the same name in other parts of the world, but you won't find even a single mention of me. That's because I have self control and self esteem. I don't put anything out there.

      This story is a fake too. The guy whines that two sites are magically able to retrieve all of his personal details and yet those very sites have now "mysteriously" disappeared...yeah a likely excuse. He's just spreading FUD and his little blog is filled with those annoying and unethical pop-ups.

    48. Re:There's no escaping it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Having a unique name, searching it provides me with joy, for that is of course also something I gamed, just in case some prospective employer wants to see what I'm up to. Me being close buddies with Bruce Schneier is getting old, though, I need a new BFF.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re:There's no escaping it by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      I love this idea... have done similar things on a much much smaller scale. The question I pose to Slashdot is this... how the hell do I get this one annoying software company ad off my Slashdot phone profile? I is there every day in some form or fashion for a year. As much as I block ads on my PC, I haven't had luck running non-Safari browsers on my iphone so ads are making me crazier and crazier. Now I just want DIFFERENT ads.

    50. Re:There's no escaping it by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Consumers have all of the power in the world to affect change... assuming they are sufficiently motivated to get off their assess and stop crying about something they have the power to change.

      They only have that power if they organize and act in concert. Individual consumers - and even groups of them that aren't a significant percentage of the whole market - have essentially zero power.

      Besides creating overlay networks on top of IP is trivially easy. You could for example run TOR on your mobile or find/create a VPN service you have some reason to trust.

      It has never been easier for people all over the world to communicate privately.

      That's true, but pretty much irrelevant to the current discussion. My carrier knows who I am, by definition - and he also knows where I am to at least a reasonable degree of accuracy, (even when I have data and WiFi turned off), via cell tower triangulation. When third party commercial entities have access to my location and my patterns of travel without my consent, that's a clear violation of privacy - and short of turning my cell phone off, there's nothing I can do about it.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    51. Re:There's no escaping it by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Escape is simple. Don't use a mobile phone.

      The slippery slope argument is obvious and, I think, valid. For a true escape I need to disengage from the Internet altogether. But then there are those cameras everywhere, and increasingly facial recognition is being used on the images they capture - time to start wearing a disguise and altering my gait. Etcetera, etcetera.

      You can get along just fine without it.

      There are LOTS of modern conveniences that we can give up - cars, telephones, toasters, electric drills... If your electric drill was spying on you and any drill you purchased did the same, would you go back to the old-fashioned way of drilling holes and driving screws?

      Remember what it was like to enjoy things with all of your attention?

      You too can really be *done* with work at 5pm, just like your boss.

      Actually, I'm pretty much my own boss right now. As for 'all of my attention', the only time my phone compromises that is when I'm making or receiving a call or a text message. Unless I'm using my phone to look up something on the web, (rare), or using it to deal with email, (once a week at most), I have both mobile data and WiFi turned off.

      Privacy is still a thing, you just have to want it.

      That's like telling a slave that 'freedom is still a thing, you just have to want it'. Shouldn't HAVE to 'want' it - it should be a given unless and until you specifically give it away without being subjected to coercion or extortion.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    52. Re:There's no escaping it by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Only about 5% of the information that comes up when searching my name actually pertains to me, and there are a great many holes in that data, as well. I can't piece together my story from what's there and I do know all of the details. Perhaps you should be more careful?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    53. Re:There's no escaping it by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Paranoid enough?

    54. Re: There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a public message forum, you were talking to everyone who reads it.

    55. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zuckerburg knows when you masterbate.

      He knows when you're skilled at restraint? That sucks but at least he doesn't know when you jack off.

    56. Re:There's no escaping it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YOUR ISP does that. Don't make blanket statements because my ISP most certainly doesn't do shit like that.

    57. Re:There's no escaping it by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Google or Bing don't show you the information that is being bought and sold about you. It's not publicly available, hence companies *selling* your info.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    58. Re:There's no escaping it by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Even if you buy it?

      Seriously.

      What Google and Bing are selling is aggregate data. You can actually buy it and find out for yourself; you don't even have to be a corporation to do so, but you can get better pricing if you're at least an LLC.

      Look at the data you can buy from them, then come talk to me. I'd share, but I'd be in violation of the agreement I signed when I paid for access.

      If you wanted a truly terrifying example, you should have used Facebook; but, then, they don't have anything on me that I didn't explicitly give them. Again, perhaps you and the AC I replied to should be more careful?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    59. Re:There's no escaping it by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      And now with the new trend of non-removable batteries, your phone is never truly off, even when you hit the power button, but instead goes into a very low-power hibernation mode due to E-911 law requirements.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  2. You agreed to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You agreed to this in the ToS. This should not be a surprise to anyone. Turn the phone off when you do your nefarious deeds; or leave it someplace where you plan to have your alibi.

    1. Re:You agreed to this by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem is, I don't know what of my currently innocent doings will be considered nefarious in a decade, and neither does anybody else.
      But the information will still be out there.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:You agreed to this by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Yea, yea, yea, first born something, surrender your immortal whatever, blah, blah blah. What's the point of reading something before signing?

    3. Re:You agreed to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, I don't know what of my currently innocent doings will be considered nefarious in a decade, and neither does anybody else.
      But the information will still be out there.

      This is what I'm most afraid of and is what makes me want to run for president of USA on the "delete all the data" campaign ... not because it would ultimately matter much, but because I sincerely believe this bullshit is humans wasting their time on asinine bullshit. Data collection about humans is, imho, largely meaningless. Yes, we're kind of interesting, but there are waaaaay more important things to be focusing on, like getting away from Earth before it is broken.

    4. Re:You agreed to this by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      ToS terms don’t supercede statutory law which is why the FCC punished them. Unfortunately now that Shit Pai runs the FCC, enforcement against his corporate masters will probably never happen.

    5. Re:You agreed to this by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Get rid of your smartphone and deny them as much data as possible. Get a plain old telephone and turn it off when you're not using it or put it in airplane mode so there's no tracking your location. If you're electronically inclined then open it up, locate the GPS antenna, and short it to ground so there'll be no GPS tracking of your location possible except what cell tower you're connected to (when the phone is on that is). Now you're giving them essentially ZERO data and they can go pound sand if they don't like it. Benefits to you are a cheaper wireless bill every month and more time to do other things instead of staring at your phone. Or you can whine at me about how you 'need' your smartphone, when you're likely just addicted to it and can't make yourself stop. Choice is yours, you can be their BITCH or you can take back control. Choose wisely.

    6. Re:You agreed to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that, almost without exception, there will be some clause in the ToS that says the company can change the terms of the agreement any time they want, to whatever they want, and you can either drop trow, bend over, and take a giant dildo in the ass, or you can stop using the service. Now, imagine this in any other context. You buy a car and agree to pay $25,000 as a random number. You write a check to the dealership for that amount and drive away with your car. A week later you get a letter in the mail from the dealership saying they've unilaterally changed the terms of the agreement and decided the car is now $30,000, so either pay them another $5,000 within 30 days or they'll repossess the car. You'd be pissed, right? Of course you would! Any sane person would be.

      Why do we accept things from our cellular providers that we wouldn't accept from a car dealer or big box retail store? Say Best Buy puts up a sign outside of every store saying that by entering the premises you agree to certain terms, like they can change prices at any time, or refuse to sell you specific products, or substitute one product for another of their choosing and at their discretion. You want to buy an Xbox One S, so you walk into your local store, grab an Xbox One S off the shelf, and take it up to the counter to pay. At that point they tell you that the terms posted outside have changed, and they won't sell you that Xbox, you have to buy a PS4 Pro instead for an extra $200. Then as you're leaving, the loss prevention person tells you the terms have changed again, and it'll be another $50 to get out of the store. You're honestly going to sit there and say with a straight face you would accept all of this because you agreed to the terms by walking into the store? I call bullshit!

      And how fitting is it that the captcha code is "compost"?

    7. Re:You agreed to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, yea, yea, first born something, surrender your immortal whatever, blah, blah blah. What's the point of reading something before signing?

      Have you read slashdot's ToS? You have agreed to it by being here.

      Have you read all the other ToS you agreed to for all the other domains that run code or provide media on this page? Here's a list:

      fsdn.com
      pro-market.net
      slashdotmedia.com
      stacksocial.com
      janrain.com
      taboola.com
      truste.com
      cloudfront.net
      ml314.com
      prxnow.com
      google-analytics.com
      crsspxl.com
      stack-sonar.com
      and a few more depending on what those domains decide to load.

      Several hundred pages of ToS just to read slashdot. Get to it, you already "agreed" to the terms.

  3. Almost? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Slackers, there's money to be made!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Buy a Librem 5 phone instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://puri.sm/shop/librem-5/

    1. Re:Buy a Librem 5 phone instead by Merk42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does the phone come with its own cell phone towers?

    2. Re:Buy a Librem 5 phone instead by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. People are missing the entire point.

    3. Re:Buy a Librem 5 phone instead by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Some of us consider every month dumping wireless phones completely and going back to POTS and an answering machine, just to poke these bastard companies in the eye.

  5. T.H. White said it best by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

    Everything which is not forbidden is compulsory.

    If a company isn't forbidden from selling it to make money they will find a way to do so.

    1. Re:T.H. White said it best by Boronx · · Score: 1

      This is why you'll see companies that pay their workers minimum wage come down in favor of raising the minimum wage.

      You are 100% correct. The simplest solution is the easiest. Elect people that will outlaw this practice.

  6. I'm OK with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as long as they use the information to target me with valuable offers and promotions.

    1. Re:I'm OK with this by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Oh, rest assured. With systems like that, they can make you an offer you can't refuse.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    2. Re:I'm OK with this by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Like a good little corporate whore...

    3. Re:I'm OK with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organized crime and its offers that cannot be refused have it easy these days.

  7. That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only turn on location services when I need it, and I don't use apps that require a constant connection. Obviously, Google, Facebook, and Amazon et. al. do not exist in my world. And BTW, I miss nothing doing things this way. If you are going to get angry with these companies, reserve some for yourself for offering up your data so willingly.

    1. Re: That's why by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 2

      I miss a great deal from family members and old friends from school because I refuse to touch facebook. I've stuck with my decision, and certainly won't change it now, but say there is no cost is wrong.

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    2. Re:That's why by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Location services has fuck all to do with what Verizon was doing.

    3. Re: That's why by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      I miss a great deal from family members and old friends from school because I refuse to touch facebook. I've stuck with my decision, and certainly won't change it now, but say there is no cost is wrong.

      I find the opposite.

      I've never touched FB, and yet I feel I've missed nothing with regard to family and friends (and I have a lot of them spread throughout the US in all the places I've lived).

      We keep in touch with group texts...emails, phone calls and (GASP) making it a point to get together whenever possible.

      My local friends I try to see at least once weekly (usually more)...and those living away, I try to fly out and see them once a year in person at least, or they come to visit me in New Orleans (helps to live in a vacation destination).

      But everyone that needs to know where I am or contact me does...and I've never felt I've been missing out on anything.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  8. You can avoid some of it by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't use Facebook... or any social networking site. If you're going to post on a site like Slashdot, consistently fake a few personal details and simply never share others.

    Don't use GMail, Hotmail, or any other such system. (I run my own mail server, which is probably not reasonable for most people... but there's also probably a market out there for a small appliance with a domain registration + DNS package that gives you your mail server without too much user effort).

    I have friends 'IRL', which is where they belong. If I only ever catch up with you by reading your Facebook page... we're not friends anymore anyway.

    You're still going to leave a trail through your credit or debit card, plus whatever government database you're in that is shared in any way, but you can significantly limit the data gathered on you.

    Unfortunately, that's less true every day. Every photo you're in is subject to facial recognition and even if it's not location tagged... location recognition probably isn't far behind (I don't like being photographed and every year I let my kids' school know they're not authorized to publish their names or pictures except in the hardcopy yearbooks). Every text post you're mentioned in can be used to build a shadow profile of you. Other people are giving up your personal information for you whether you want them to or not. And, of course... your phone company is pimping you out to data miners like you're a $2 alley-dwelling crack whore.

    1. Re:You can avoid some of it by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with Facebook. Your PHONE is tracking you. Do you have a phone? If so, why do you care about Facebook?

    2. Re:You can avoid some of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also minimize use of credit cards and use cash for all local purchasing. That's harder for online purchasing, but most people still buy a lot of things locally and you can avoid leaving a trail for the data-brokers by using cash.

    3. Re:You can avoid some of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Bob! Hope to see you on NYC on next week.

    4. Re:You can avoid some of it by PPH · · Score: 1

      Your PHONE is tracking you.

      I thought I saw something duck into an alley when I looked over my shoulder while walking down the street last night.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:You can avoid some of it by Lastfree · · Score: 1

      Governments want to know everything about us. And all this is happening so that we are more secure. But we are not. We lose freedom without gaining anything in return.

      --
      And for coloring fans: Topcoloringpages
    6. Re:You can avoid some of it by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Did it quack? It was definitely a duck.

    7. Re:You can avoid some of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the person wearing white? If so it was probably just Flo and her "name your price" gun.

  9. Defeatist crap trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If the war is lost, why did they need to keep it secret??

    Just buy up every celebrity location, politician, judge, tv presenter's data and do cross analysis on it.

    Want to know who Hannity met just before he repeated that Russian "deep state" crap? Just pull his data, his families data and do co-location analysis to go see.

    Want to know who Chairman Pai met just before he started on that attempt to kill Net Neutrality, well his location data will show where he was and who he met with, if it was a face to face meeting that is.

    The only people stripped from that data are typically Verizon, ATnT CEO's. We learned they strip their own data from the NSA spy set, so it will be stripped from this one too.

  10. Suprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    You are carrying a location tracking device in your pocket. Don't be surprised.

  11. Just make sure you support the troops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and don't use the term "climate change" and you should be fine.

    1. Re:Just make sure you support the troops by thomn8r · · Score: 1

      That's it - you're on the list now; this will be on your Permanent Record

  12. Cooking stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the latest conviction of someone using a pressure cooker to make a bomb, I'm going to assume that anyone visiting a store that sells them is going to be looked upon with suspicion.

    If you're a black powder gun enthusiast living in Denver who likes to cook, you're in for a rough ride.

  13. opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time for people to opt out of this shit instead of just bitching about it.

    Any data you give away WILL be tied to your profile and bought and sold behind your back. You should minimize the data trail you leave. Do not carry an always on tracking device. If you must carry a phone take the battery out and only insert it when you want to make a call. (Yes, this means you should buy a phone with a removable battery, and yes, you can buy those).

    Stop using Facebook and similar. Just stop. There is nothing in it for you.

    Stop giving all your photos, messages,k emails, etc to your corporate masters.

    The more you feed this machine the more powerful it will become. If you do not want it, then stop feeding it.

    1. Re:opt out. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      "If you must carry a phone take the battery out and only insert it when you want to make a call".

      Give me a break. It is 2017. If you are going to use your mobile phone like that, why carry one at all. And what is astonishing is someone posted this drivel on the Internet. If you are going to all this trouble, why are you using the Internet? The Internet is the biggest data collection machine of them all.

    2. Re:opt out. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      You couldn’t opt out of it. Verizon was doing it in secret.

    3. Re:opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fallacy of false equivalence.

      I can and do use the internet through tor for anything except banking and such which require personal identification. Tor allows to negate most commercial tracking and all but dedicated and targeted goverment origin tracking, which not being a "person of interest" I do not worry about.

      Your idiotic argument sounds like telling someone, "You are already 10 pounds overweight - why worry about another 250 lbs? Eat anything and everything! Do not worry!"

      But that's idiotic. 10 pounds and 250 pounds overweight are not the same thing. Just because something is not 100% perfect, it does not mean making it multiples worse is a good idea.

    4. Re:opt out. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No you don't. No one uses Tor for day to day browsing. Baloney. And Tor is completely broken at this point anyway. The exit nodes are monitored.

    5. Re: opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's paying you to shill today? AT&T?

    6. Re:opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yes, I do use it for day to day browsing.

      WTF? You are just trolling I guess.

    7. Re:opt out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can opt out by not having a Verizon phone.

  14. Follow the Phone by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    So instead of "Follow the Money", the new investigator's dogma is "Follow the Phones". Nice.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  15. run a vpn by Kludge · · Score: 1

    As I understand this, it could be easily thwarted by running a VPN. My wife runs vpn on her phone constantly. It is easy enough.

    1. Re:run a vpn by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. How would a VPN help? A mobile phone is a location tracking device. It is part of the network design and wouldn't work without it.

    2. Re:run a vpn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't block tower based location tracking, or GPS. It might prevent tying that to her personal identity if she isn't leaking that identity in any other way, but it's fairly difficult not to leak it in other ways. It may be possible, but takes a lot of care and attention.

    3. Re:run a vpn by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Verizon will still know your location, but they will not be able to share it with the advertiser.

      It would help because, the way this works is that Verizon injects cookies into the HTTP request. Then the advertiser sees the cookies and goes "Oh, let me make a web service call to Verizon to get the location for the user with this cookie." They can also fall back to using their IP address. If you use a VPN, Verizon won't be able to MITM your browsing session, and your IP address will be the VPN's IP address. The advertiser won't even know that you are a mobile user and won't have any information to use to look you up.

    4. Re:run a vpn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VPN's endpoint IP address would not be in a block allocated to a carrier. If the site you're visiting sends a request to AT&T asking for data related to the IP address you used to visit it, AT&T won't know which customer, if any, that IP could be in use by. Not without some other sneaky shit involved, anyway.

    5. Re:run a vpn by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, odds are your browser self-identifies as a mobile browser. So they will know that. But it will protect the rest of your data.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:run a vpn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the telco knows where the phone is..

      The point of the article is the internet at large can is able to figure out who you are and where you are based on your IP address and/or tracking crap the telco is injecting into your HTTP requests.

      VPN kinda breaks both of those, as your browsing will appear to come from your VPN end point, and how is a telco going to easily tinker with your http headers inside a VPN tunnel?

      Back to networking 101 for you.

  16. I have a telephone by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    and it is firmly anchored to the wall. Next question?

    1. Re:I have a telephone by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You don't have a mobile phone? Sure. You login to Slashdot and they are selling and tracking you. Good job.

    2. Re:I have a telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't speak for jabberw0k, but I don't have one either. And I AC into slashdot through a proxy.

      So no, they aren't.

      But to your question, people care about Facebook even if they DO have a phone, because (a) FB is considered more intrusive by many people, (b) multiple things can be bad at the same time. Pointing out that X is bad does not negate the reality that B is also bad.

    3. Re:I have a telephone by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      "AC" means nothing, neither does proxying. You are still tracked. Browser fingerprinting a a real thing. The point is, this is nothing about FB. It is about MOBILE PHONE OPERATORS.

    4. Re:I have a telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have one either, and I post anonymously with most scripts and 3rd party content disabled. Anything more to say? :)

    5. Re:I have a telephone by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Sure. You are still being tracked. "Anonymous" means nothing. This article has nothing to do with that.

    6. Re:I have a telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One key point of TOR is that it defeats browser fingerprinting by making all users have the same fingerprint.

      And the person you followed up to made the point: our phones are attached to the wall. There is no sale of our per-minute location by the phone company, because we are not giving them that data.

    7. Re:I have a telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your comment about, then? Don't try to run away from your own thread after making silly assumptions about other people.

  17. The saddest part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The saddest part of this news, and so much news like it.. Is that none of this crap surprises me anymore. I already expected that they were selling me out, and I'd be more surprised if they weren't.

    What the hell is happening to the world?

  18. Revoke their "common carrier" status. by emil · · Score: 1

    If Verizon and AT&T are pathologically customer-hostile, then it is time for the electorate to emasculate them.

    Tor is obviously not enough. Fine them into oblivion, then sell their assets at auction.

  19. Shitty voting by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Let's address the root of the issue: This is all 100% legal because the assclowns that most people vote for made it so. None of this should be legal. My ISP shouldn't be selling my info. My cell provider shouldn't be selling my info.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re: Shitty voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

    2. Re: Shitty voting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but, Her Emails1!!11!!

  20. Suckers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't nobody use land lines and payphones anymore if you really have to? What's the obsession with always being reachable or reaching out? People got along without smartphones before. It's more destructive than convenient. People don't seem much happier, only more obsessed.

    1. Re:Suckers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay phones? That's cute. Hell, most callboxes on the freeway are gone, too. Governments and corporations have colluded for decades to lead people to use one thing or another. This is the endgame of capitalism. Hold onto your butts.

  21. It's been going on for some time. by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    And I'm getting sick of strangers calling me.

  22. Well, duh by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    If a company has data about you, they are selling it to anyone willing to pay the fee.

    There are exceptions, of course, but they are rare enough to safely ignore.

    1. Re:Well, duh by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      There are exceptions, of course, but they are rare enough to safely ignore.

      No, the exceptions are usually worse. Of course, by exceptions I mean Google, Facebook, etc. Those who prioritize collecting and monetizing all that data, and would never dream of selling such an asset.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Well, duh by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I don't think of those as exceptions, but I guess technically they are. The reason I don't think of them as exceptions is because they're just cutting out the middleman while retaining the sort of behavior I object to.

  23. The war was lost because we never fought it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All business will respond to force (political/legal/economic force).

    But applying such force requires numbers.

    When the majority don't know and don't care, the force can't be mustered.

    Our position on privacy lost the majority vote long ago.

  24. Two words: Harvey Weinstein by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Or enjoy playing with them. Poison their data well. Create false information about yourself. Get creative and have exciting new hobbies. Have fun with it and explore the exiting world of being a product. [examples...]

    Reminds me of the "defamation service" suggested by some people in the '80s. Idea was to hire a servince to spread lots of scandalous, but clearly false if examined closely, rumor about you, in order to discredit any other rumors about you later.

    Problem is, that puts too high a bar on the rumor-hearers. If they DON'T go on to the discrediting stage, you've just trashed your own rep for no gain - and lots of potential loss.

    Scandalous rumor (especially if true, but false can do it, too) can take down even a rich and powerful figure VERY fast. See Harvey Weinstein for an example of fast, JonBenet Ramsey's parents for an example of false.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  25. For credit card / payment processing by captaindomon · · Score: 1

    From reading the blog post carefully, it looks like this is designed for credit card processing verification at the point of service. Allowing the gas station's credit card processor to verify you really are at the gas station your credit card is being used at. So in that use case, they would already have your location because they know where the POS terminal is located. This doesn't seem too concerning to me, but they should probably provide an opt-out.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:For credit card / payment processing by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I think the part that's concerning is that entities that aren't related to a transaction that you're conducting can buy that information.

  26. #optoutofamerica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be both a true patriot and a revolutionary! Opt out of America and build the foundations for a great new nation that enshrines this generation's values.

    Because if you don't, who will?

  27. Sigh, so tired of everyone selling us out by mccrew · · Score: 1

    This is SO tiring. Everywhere there is someone looking for some way to sell us out for a quick buck. Here we go again, the carriers trying to get their pound of flesh and avoid being disintermediated by the Facebooks and Alphabets of the world.

    Not really related, but last night I saw the 60 Minutes piece showing how Rep. Tom Marino, a Pennsylvania Republican, shepherded big-pharma-written legislation to prevent the DEA from prosecuting Fortune 500 companies which deliberately make opiates available for diversion to the black market, fueling the epidemic and their profits. All with congressional cover.

    It's just nonstop. Seems like it is going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  28. Looking in the wrong direction for "Big Brother" by sl3xd · · Score: 1

    Is anybody still under the impression that Orwell's "Big Brother" can only be a government?

    The rise of "Big Brother" is being missed because everybody's convinced it can only come from the Government... and not from friendly corporations, who only have our best interests at heart.

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  29. NO FUCKING SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't news. In other not news: your mobile carrier is selling the rest of the information you provide to them (PII, financial stuff, it's in the agreement), your financial institutions are selling your shopping lists. Virtually every entity with any info on large groups of people are selling it. Google and Facebook don't do that because they're ad networks—the typical buyers—and don't want to provide it to competitors. Government agencies and hospitals probably do not sell much of your information, but maybe think twice before paying for meds with credit next time if you care about keeping that kind of thing private.

  30. The difference is it's easy to not use Facebook by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    getting by without a mobile phone is damn near impossible, especially in today's hyper-competitive job market.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The difference is it's easy to not use Facebook by gnick · · Score: 2

      The difference is it's easy to not use Facebook

      Just because you've never signed up for FB does not mean they're not tracking you. You're a FB user the same way you're an Equifax customer.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  31. Fake personal details? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    That's a great idea. Let me get started:

    I'm a 6'2'" wall of muscle with a string of romantic conquests, a PHD is Astrophysics and a collection of Star Wars action figures.

    Ha! Only one of those things is true but good luck figuring out which with all your highfalutin statistics.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Fake personal details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a baker in Brussels. I'm 6'4" and full of muscles. I speak English and enjoy Vegemite.

  32. That answers my question by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    After the eclipse while on vacation, I got spammed on my cell phone from a business I drove past. I wondered who outed me, guess it was my cell phone service.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:That answers my question by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Did you have WiFi on? They might have just caught your device on their network.

  33. Opt-in by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    We need a comprehensive law that requires for each and every bit of information to be collected written consent. First violation is 5% of annual revenue, second offense is 20% of revenue, third is the end of the entire corporation with top level managers being personally liable for any damages. Harsh, but will fix this rampant abuse in no time.

  34. How to Win Against Corporate Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a reliable, logless VPN with a proven track record of standing up for users and privacy. Opt for open source solutions whenever possible. Consider using an open source mobile operating system like Copperhead. Use a logless search engine like DuckDuckGo or Startpage. Use a privacy-friendly e-mail provider like ProtonMail or StartMail. Encourage your friends, family and colleagues to use Telegram, Signal, or Wire, and conduct as much conversation as possible on those services. Use Firefox or Brave as a web browser instead of Chrome or IE. Install ad and tracker blockers like Disconnect, uBlock or AdBlock Plus. Use HTTPS Everywhere. Get off social media, or at least be cautious of what you post and control your settings.

    These things wonâ(TM)t solve every problem, but they will solve most of them, especially if tens of millions of us are doing it. Corporate surveillance is a business; make it expensive for them to spy on us and the market will bankrupt them or force them to stop spying.