Slashdot Mirror


Hong Kong Has No Space Left for the Dead (vice.com)

Justin Heifetz, writing for Motherboard: When Fung Wai-tsun's family carried their grandfather's ashes across the Hong Kong border to Mainland China in 2013, they worried Customs officers, thinking the urn was full of drugs, would stop them. Fung, like many others in Hong Kong, could not find a space to lay his loved one to rest in his own city and would have to settle for a site across the border and hours away. It's an increasingly common story as demand for spaces to house the dead outpaces supply here in the semi-autonomous Chinese territory of some 7.4 million people. Hong Kong's public, government-run spaces to store ashes -- which are affordable to the public, starting at $360 -- have waiting lists that can last years. But many Chinese, like Fung, strongly believe the ashes must be put in a resting place immediately as to not disrespect their ancestor's spirit. Meanwhile, a private space -- one that is not run by the government -- tends to start at more than $6,000 and can go for as high as $130,000. This is simply not an option for many families like the Fung's. In Hong Kong, most people cremate their loved ones and house the urns in columbariums, or spaces where people can then go to pay their respects. While burying a body is possible, the option is prohibitively expensive -- and besides, Hong Kong has a law that the body must be exhumed after six years, at which point one must be cremated.

165 comments

  1. Richard Fleischer had a solution to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we all know what that is.

    1. Re:Richard Fleischer had a solution to this by haruchai · · Score: 1

      And we all know what that is.

      Make Room! Make Room!

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  2. cremation, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't waste space on dead people
    it makes no sense you even have a choice about this

    1. Re:cremation, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "ashes" makes you think they are talking about an intact corpse?

    2. Re:cremation, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so discard the ashes

    3. Re:cremation, duh by hawguy · · Score: 1

      don't waste space on dead people
      it makes no sense you even have a choice about this

      Or skip the energy waste of cremation and just go with a natural burial in a compostable coffin:

      https://www.livescience.com/74...

    4. Re:cremation, duh by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Philistine! You don't discard the ashes, you put them in a terracotta urn and play test cricket over who gets to hold onto it.

    5. Re:cremation, duh by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Cremation? But what about the Resurrection?

      Also, to point out, the reason a corpse is cremated in a casket is so that there are some ashes to put in the urn.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. Cremation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I die I don't want to be buried. Please cremate me, thank you (I'm not Catholic, I'm Atheist).

    1. Re:Cremation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect. No afterlife for you anyway!

    2. Re:Cremation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Here lies an atheist.
      All dressed up and
      nowhere to go."

    3. Re:Cremation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you only read TFS: no place to store ashes

    4. Re:Cremation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along with everyone else.

  4. waiting lists? by djchristensen · · Score: 1

    It initially struck my as very odd that there could be a waiting list for space to open up at a place to store the dead...

    1. Re:waiting lists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Storing the dead is retarded. Tell em to blow it out their shark-fin soup holes.

  5. Cement? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about mixing cremated ash into cement and concrete? One can then literally become "one with the city". Soylent Cement Co.? Corporations ARE people? Let the jokes roll...

    1. Re:Cement? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure as an alternative to immediately putting the ashes in a resting spot, so as to not dishonor the spirit, turning the departed into a paving brick is completely acceptable to the family of the deceased.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:Cement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone believes in a spirit. I don't.

      Mixing ashes with concrete sounds very pragmatic and I'd support that, for sure.

    3. Re:Cement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone believes in a spirit. I don't.

      Mixing ashes with concrete sounds very pragmatic and I'd support that, for sure.

      I believe in a spirit. I also believe that my spirit won't have any use for my corpse after I'm dead.

      Take my body out in the woods and dump it. Let the animals eat it up.

    4. Re:Cement? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Cultural values change.

      I thought "why not bury them under the sea surrounding Hong Kong?"

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re: Cement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tiananmen Paving Company likes the cut of your jib.

    6. Re:Cement? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      What about mixing cremated ash into cement and concrete?

      What about mixing it into the soil of a moderately large pot plant? Long term reminder, regular attention to the deceased ; reasonably compact ; good for the house or apartment's atmosphere. Moves with owner.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    7. Re:Cement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about mixing it into the soil of a moderately large pot plant?

      No thanks. I don't care to have my remains confiscated by the narc squad!

  6. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are you here? Slashdot has never been only tech

  7. Pacific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big, big ocean.

    1. Re:Pacific by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You want to pollute the oceans! You're a very, very bad man. /BabuBhatt

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  8. Re:What the fuck? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Why is this on Slashdot?

    The Slashdot headline AI is now doing Halloween stories. I like it.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. more like the Shaw Brothers & George Romero by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    man, you interpreted that quite differently than I did.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:more like the Shaw Brothers & George Romero by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2

      When there's no more room in columbariums, the dead will walk the earth.

    2. Re:more like the Shaw Brothers & George Romero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes dead is bettah.

  10. San Francisco "moved" it's dead a long time ago by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    San Francisco voted to stop burying dead folks in the city way back in 1900. Rich folks had their graves moved. Poor folks often didn't get moved at all. http://www.7x7.com/the-dark-hi...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:San Francisco "moved" it's dead a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They've been busy burying the living ever since.

    2. Re:San Francisco "moved" it's dead a long time ago by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I'd like to have my body dumped into the Bay for the crabs to eat. Preferably after I die of natural causes.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:San Francisco "moved" it's dead a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The graves moved to the adjacent city, Colma, which has the distinction of more dead people than living within its city limits. Almost 2 million dead versus 2 thousand alive. It is right there in the official city motto, "It is great to be alive in Colma." And let us not forget the city have a few pet cemeteries as well.

    4. Re:San Francisco "moved" it's dead a long time ago by bsharma · · Score: 1

      Burial at sea is an ancient and respected tradition; especially for those who have served in the navies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    5. Re:San Francisco "moved" it's dead a long time ago by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      The Anglican Communion has detailed procedures for burial at sea. The ship has to be stopped, and the body has to be sewn in canvas, suitably weighted. Anglican (and other) chaplains of the Royal Navy bury cremated remains of ex-Naval personnel at sea. Scattering of cremated remains is discouraged, not least for practical reason

      I'm thinking more along the lines of being dumped out of a speed boat as it passes through the Golden Gate. If I need a religious reason I am an ordained minster of the Church of the Subgenius. It's how "Bob" would have wanted me to go.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  11. Re:Why is this here? by mikael · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's related to tech through science-fiction writing. Many authors based stories on the prospect of the world running out of space and alternative solutions being found (removing health and safety laws to increase death rates), allowing the population to eliminate each other to get birth permits. Star Wars even had an entire planet based on this problem (Coruscant).

    Some countries like Bangladesh and Singapore have also run out of space. Bangladesh is begging other countries to take their surplus population. Hong Kong already has "coffin apartments". The next stage for them is to start building over the oceans or reclaiming land.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  12. It's not just Grandpa's ashes in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morgues burn bodies in mass. You've got 9 other people in there, at least.

    Just throw it all into the ocean and be done with it. It's just ashes. Frame a picture of him, it's better.

    1. Re:It's not just Grandpa's ashes in there by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "En masse". And no, they don't, if a body has been claimed. The body is transported to the private facility of the next of kin's choice.

    2. Re:It's not just Grandpa's ashes in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the efficient way, but they generally don't do it so as not to step on people's sensibilities. One of the very few things I actually learned from Auschwitz (don't waste your time; while it's ghastly, it's not very well organized or presented) is that the company responsible for building the cremation ovens actually had an advanced idea for a multi-stage crematorium that could, after about two days of being fueled externally, continue to burn just off the bodies themselves. Not going to get properly-separated ashes from that.

  13. If it must be a shrine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then the people of Hong Kong should consider this model https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_Monument

  14. overpopulation again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    same day, different article, same comment. https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

  15. Just leave them inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be obvious, but in a situation like this, don't bring out yer dead.

  16. Speaking of dead people, I miss George Carlin. by sootman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cemeteries: there's another idea whose time has passed! Saving all the dead people in one part of town? What the hell kind of a superstitious religious medieval bullshit idea is that? Plow these motherfuckers up, plow them into the streams and rivers of America, we need that phosphorus for farming! If we're gonna recycle, let's get serious!

    —George Carlin, Jammin' In New York (1992)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Speaking of dead people, I miss George Carlin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? He's just a pile of fucking dirt right now. What kind of superstitious religious medieval bullshit idea is this about missing the old coot, anyway?

    2. Re:Speaking of dead people, I miss George Carlin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just remove any heavy metals from the ashes before plowing them to uncontrolled environments. Collecting phosphorous from the black water is also a great way of continuing the phosphorous sources that run out otherwise within 200 years.

    3. Re:Speaking of dead people, I miss George Carlin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why? He's just a pile of fucking dirt right now. What kind of superstitious religious medieval bullshit idea is this about missing the old coot, anyway?

      That pile of fucking dirt would still more thoughtful and interesting to listen to in its current form than most people who are actually alive today, that's why.

    4. Re:Speaking of dead people, I miss George Carlin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. I'm just showing the same level of respect for him that he showed the dead that went before him.

  17. Home? by superdave80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just find a nice little spot in your home to store the ashes? In fact, I would start making a picture frame/box combo for families. Ashes in the box on the back, picture of the deceased on the front. Hang it up on the wall or place it on a shelf.

    1. Re:Home? by martinX · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall reading that the ashes one receives from the crematorium to put in, say, an urn are only a small fraction of the ashes generated.

      Makes sense - the average human adult male is approximately 60% water and the average adult female is approximately 50% so an 80 kg male will become quite a few kilos of ashes (I'm assuming some weight besides water is lost up the chimney).

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:Home? by fisted · · Score: 1

      More likely, every so many cremations they'll just dump the entire ashes of that one person into their ash supply for refilling, and start handing out ashes from that until it's time for the next refill.

      Ain't nobody got time to extract ashes from the oven each time. And it's not like anyone could even notice.

    3. Re:Home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's barely enough room for living people in most HK homes?

    4. Re:Home? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Makes sense - the average human adult male is approximately 60% water and the average adult female is approximately 50% so an 80 kg male will become quite a few kilos of ashes (I'm assuming some weight besides water is lost up the chimney)."

      Make sense... are you sure?

      Apart from water, an organic body is mostly made of four elements: Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and Nitrogen (and traces of a lot others). All C,H,O,N can, and will, under highly enough temperatures and time "gas away", so you end up with very little weight of "unburnable" (under usual conditions) ashes.

    5. Re:Home? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Just from TFS, it sounds like that would be against their beliefs. Not that beliefs can't be changed when the need arises (they would just have to redefine what it means to "respectfully" put the to dead rest in their cultural context to include an enshrined urn or whatever.) But its probably a more difficult change than just taking the deceased a bit further away and continuing with existing practices.

    6. Re:Home? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Why would I want an ugly pot in my house? Or a frame that is way to expensive and won't fit when I move. And if there are families where both kids want it, do both get half a parent?
      What happens after several generations?

      Both my parents died this year. What my sister and myself did was a cremation and then a burial at sea. That basically means trowing the urn overboard in a dignified way. To me it was extremely beautiful and nice and serene. Better than a burial.

      How this can be done where you live and if it is even possible depends from country to country. What people do with my body after I die I do not care. Just put the ashes in a dustbin for al I care. I won't be there to see it and it is more for THEM to process the loss of a loved one.

      Graveyards are a waste of space. They cost also a lot and, at least in most places in Europe, you will rent it for 30 years and then after that you need to pay extra. Not even talking about the issues between siblings if one wants to keep it; the second one does not have the money and the third one wants to pay less, because they did the maintenance in the last 10 years.

      My wish since I was a kid was to be fed to the lions in a zoo. That way my body would still be useful somewhat. I doubt that is legal.

      What my great aunt did was give her body to science. She opensourced her body https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      They found some interesting stuff about getting old as well as being the inspiration to ask ,ore people who are older than 100 to donate their body for science.

      So that is a route I am now looking into, although I am not even close to that age.

      Also: Do not forget to get a donor card. You body can be used by others. Let your closest family know that you are a donor and ask them to see to it that will be done when you die. To often it happens that the person is a donor, yet the family objects, because they did not know. To avoid legal struggles, these people, who wanted to be donors, won't be.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Home? by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

      Some people do this, but there are traditions involved beyond just putting a box on a shelf. It takes some space to build a little shrine, and there are incense involved. HK apartments can be really small.

    8. Re:Home? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      What my sister and myself did was a cremation and then a burial at sea. That basically means trowing the urn overboard in a dignified way. To me it was extremely beautiful and nice and serene.

      But to my mind, boring. I have a donor card, but once all the useful bits have been harvested, I think I'd like my burial at see to be part of a shark-watch. Toss my leftovers overboard and let the feeding frenzy begin. Bring your cameras.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  18. I don't get it... by djbckr · · Score: 1

    Here in the USA there seems to be a huge emphasis on the "preservation of the body". I remember when some of my family has died and the funeral directors actually used these words. And they use cement lined burial plots with sealed coffins. I simply don't get it.

    The person that died is done with their body, so they don't need it preserved. Us living people will never see the body ever again, so we don't need it preserved. We should just bore a 3 foot wide hole about 12 feet deep, drop the body in head-first, and cover it back up.

    Cremation seems a bit overkill too, and uses an enormous amount of energy. We should probably do communal cremation (100 at a time?) to save energy and space.

    There's nothing about what I'm saying that is disrespectful to the persons who have passed. Tell me where I'm wrong.

    1. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should impale their carcasses on top of the wall we're about to build between us and Mexico as a dire warning to anyone who is foolish enough to try to sneak in to our country.

    2. Re:I don't get it... by MikeDataLink · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Most burial rituals were created for religious (another idea whose time has passed!) reasons. Christians don't want to cremate because they are worried there will be no body for god to raise at the end times. All cremation does is speed along the process, but people don't understand that.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    3. Re:I don't get it... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      There are many ways to dispose of the dead. Cremation is ideal because any bacteria, viruses, prions, or other stuff are incinerated and can't infect others. Plus, a columbarium can hold a lot more urns than a cemetery can hold cold ones.

    4. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing about what I'm saying that is disrespectful to the persons who have passed. Tell me where I'm wrong.

      You're wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to begin. It's all about respect for the deceased, respect for those still living.

      As a side note, if you truly believe what you wrote then you lack empathy are I do not even consider you a human being.

    5. Re:I don't get it... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      cement lined burial plots with sealed coffins.

      This is actually only required of the body is preserved with formaldehyde before burial. It prevents groundwater contamination.

    6. Re:I don't get it... by kwoff · · Score: 1

      There's another option apparently becoming more popular recently. (Skeptical me thinks it's probably an advertisement.) I can't say I appreciate worrying about the carbon footprint of cremation, though...

    7. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the USA there seems to be a huge emphasis on the "preservation of the body". I remember when some of my family has died and the funeral directors actually used these words. And they use cement lined burial plots with sealed coffins. I simply don't get it.

      The person that died is done with their body, so they don't need it preserved. Us living people will never see the body ever again, so we don't need it preserved. We should just bore a 3 foot wide hole about 12 feet deep, drop the body in head-first, and cover it back up.

      Cremation seems a bit overkill too, and uses an enormous amount of energy. We should probably do communal cremation (100 at a time?) to save energy and space.

      There's nothing about what I'm saying that is disrespectful to the persons who have passed. Tell me where I'm wrong.

      Part of the reason for concrete-lined burial plots and sealed caskets is to prevent the spread of disease, but cremation would take care of this, too.

    8. Re:I don't get it... by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      One old timey Christian belief was in bodily resurrection, not a spiritual one. So you'd need your body intact. Cremation was seen as something pagans did. It is among the reasons that dismemberment is seen as so gruesome.

    9. Re:I don't get it... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Christians don't want to cremate because they are worried there will be no body for god to raise at the end times.

      Genesis 3:19, Ecclesiastes 3:20.

      The 'end times' believers haven't been reading their Bible. I doubt they are true Christians.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are fucking ridiculous. Nobody needs the dead body anymore, except maybe hospitals for body parts and university hospitals for disecting etc. and perhaps cannibals.

      After harvesting any usable parts, you can throw my carcass to the crows for all i care. Just drop it out of a moving vehicle, if that's easiest. Wait! I don't care, cause i'm dead at that point, i hope.

    11. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality beats superstition every time in the real world. When you get a chance you should join us.

    12. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they are true Christians.

      The True Christians died out some 2000 years ago.

    13. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw that, and that is an interesting option, as well as the one shared on FB often about flash-freezing and turning the body to powder. However, both of those still have infectious prions, bacteria, and viruses to deal with.

    14. Re:I don't get it... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Cremation possibly takes less energy overall than a burial; when you could the digging of the grave, making the headstone, the metal coffins, the cement liners, etc. However there's a company or two that are trying a new process if dissolving the body in a heated alkaline liquid, leaving onlly the skeleton behind. There is some energy involved but overall a lot less than cremation.

    15. Re:I don't get it... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      This is only true in some traditions. Most mainline denominations (Lutheran, Episcopalian/Anglican, UCC, or whatever) are perfectly okay with cremation, burial at sea, or whatever else, as long as it's done with dignity and respect. The funeral rites that are in the hymnals/worship books tend to contain options/appropriate words for all of the above.

      Heck, last year even the Vatican has said that it's acceptable for Catholics to be cremated, as long as the ashes are kept together in a sacred/blessed place.

      So yeah, don't paint all Christians with the same brush.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    16. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One old timey Christian belief was in bodily resurrection, not a spiritual one. So you'd need your body intact. Cremation was seen as something pagans did. It is among the reasons that dismemberment is seen as so gruesome.

      What good is it to come back to a pile of bones though? If God can make a new body from that then why not from ashes or from nothing?

    17. Re:I don't get it... by MikeDataLink · · Score: 0

      "So yeah, don't paint all Christians with the same brush."

      If you believe in a skygod, then yeah... same brush... different color.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    18. Re:I don't get it... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Usually It's a cultural rather than religious reason for burial customs. There's nothing in Christian scriptures saying how to deal with the deceased, no prohibitions against cremation and no rules requiring burial. There are some sects or denominations opposed to it however for the reason you give for sort of the reason you gave (though it's more about sending the wrong signal than in believing there is a limit to omnipotence). However early Christian burial practices were borrowed from Jewish culture that often forbids cremation. Islam also forbids cremation in general. Some of this is likely due to similarities to pagan rituals.

      Also throw in a lot of laws regulations and history as well. Dead get buried in reserved lots of land rather than in back yards. Tombs for kings versus mass graves for paupers meant that rising middle classes wanted something nicer. Cremation could be impractical in certain places or eras. And so forth.

    19. Re:I don't get it... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I simply don't get it.

      Funeral directors are in the business of making money. A simple wooden box sent to the crematorium doesn't make them as much as a silk-lined coffin with concrete mausoleum. They're also uniquely positioned to hard sell (or flat out guilt-trip) their wares onto grieving relatives.

      This is partly why a lot of older people pre-pay for their funerals and specify exactly how they want their remains to be dealt with. Personally I liked the idea of a tree burial*, until I saw how much they cost (more than a regular burial). Now I've bought the cheapest possible funeral plan and left instructions in my will that if my executor wants anything more they can pay for it themselves, and that I specifically don't want a church service. If people want to mourn me I'd rather they spent the money on a big party and a booze-up than sit in a church listening to a priest mumble platitudes about someone they've never even met. This actually happened with an uncle of mine some years ago; the priest, as it happens, was a young Justin Welby.

      *Your body is put in a cardboard or wicker box, buried in a field somewhere with a sapling as a grave marker.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    20. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even the same body you had ten years ago.

      We're constantly taking in new molecules and shedding old ones. They form a pattern which we think of as our "self," but it's really just the arbitrary collection of chemicals that happened to be passing through when you kicked the bucket.

      If they insist on preserving the body, why don't they also preserve every turd you ever passed?

    21. Re:I don't get it... by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      You could burn the powder. I'd say a significant portion of the energy required to cremate a body is used to boil off water, so it would be significantly more efficient while eliminating any biohazards.

    22. Re:I don't get it... by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      Original Christian belief was in bodily resurrection, not a spiritual one. So you'd need your body intact. Cremation was seen as something pagans did.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    23. Re:I don't get it... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      For suitably small values of intact. Or did they not have germs & worms in those days?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:I don't get it... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Right, but if you had an omnipotent deity, then you could be fixed when resurrected. I don't think many at the time were assuming you'd be literally resurrected missing a leg or that you could not be resurrected if you were cremated. Corinthians talks about resurrection into a new body, not the decayed old one. Instead it seems more likely that they treated cremation as a sign of rejecting the possibility of resurrection. Also it's very much a Jewish belief as well, and the early Church was Jewish. Local culture always influences religions and vice versa, and it becomes difficult to try and separate the two.

    25. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You first!

    26. Re:I don't get it... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      I would call it a gimmick more than an advertisement, but hey it never hurts to have alternatives I guess.

      Personally I find the thought of being dissolved and then crushed more disturbing than being burned to ash, but maybe its just cause I'm more familiar with the latter. The liquifaction thing just makes me think far too much of movie killers getting rid of bodies in their bathtubs using essentially exactly that method..

    27. Re:I don't get it... by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Significantly less energy, less potential environmental contamination and so on. Burial is actually a pretty horrible way to dispose of bodies, but its easier emotionally. Seeing an urn and knowing that's all that's left is somehow more difficult than knowing there's an in-tact body in the coffin and having moved on in life (such as one can) before you really start thinking about decomposition. Basically an out-of-sight, out-of-mind thing.

      But the big savings, especially in countries like Hong Kong and even parts of Europe, where there's a large population and little land area, is in real estate. A 8'x4' plot or whatever size they are is simply a lot of wasted space compared to an urn that, even if you bury it, only takes a hole a few inches in diameter. (And a lot of people don't even do that, opting to keep the urns in their home or whatever as a display piece/reminder.)

    28. Re:I don't get it... by WallyL · · Score: 1

      I don't care at all about what happens to my body after I die, and I'm a Christian (lit. "little Christ"). I believe in the resurrection of the saints when the Son of God returns, and what that means exactly about the dust my bones will have turned into/been paved into Oak St./spread across the ocean/sniffed by a druggie, I trust He can take care. I guess I'm not a typical Christian-- I mean, I "read" slashdot. How can I be a typical anything?

    29. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and I'm a Christian (lit. "little Christ")

      Nope.

  19. We need more fascinating stories like this on Slas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A long time ago Slashdot abandoned technology stories in favor of stories about large tech companies like Uber, IBM, Facebook, Google, Apple, Intel, Amazon, Microsoft, Motorola, Asus, AMD, Kaspersky, etc ad nauseum. But now it appears they have completely abandoned the tech angle altogether. I look forward to future stories on the maiting habits of Australian fruit bats.

  20. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for at least giving an actual response rather than what seems to have become the obligatory "I don't like your post, -1" moderation. As not being a huge sci-fi fan, I really didn't understand why something like this would be remotely appropriate on a site like this.

    To whoever modded me -1, answer this, was my post off topic? Was it flamebait? Ask yourself honestly, what about it deserved a -1 beyond "I don't like your post"?

  21. Discard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so discard the ashes

    No. Don't discard them. Use them. Ashes can be useful. Let people keep their relative in a cup on the mantelpiece or let them use the ashes. Like most things in life, this isn't complicated except by the fact that people act irrationally.

    1. Re:Discard by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Woodchipper, chum, fishing, drinking (hired diver hanging my junk on friends hook).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Discard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my relatives’ ashes as a lube base. Works amazingly.

    3. Re: Discard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My relatives ashes are distributed in pepper shakers in restaurants all across America. Everyone eats my grandpa with their fries.

    4. Re: Discard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine will be put in egg timers. Set so that its runny and likely cuase of food poisoning.

      I look forward to continue to disappoint people from beyond

  22. hongkong by douglas23 · · Score: 1

    isn't HongKong it's own separate state and independent country with the fastest internet on the planet because it's incredibly small size?

    1. Re:hongkong by Lobachevsky · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the British handed over HK to China in the late 1990s. China promised not to "interfere" with HK until 2047, but are already meddling in massive ways like requiring all elections in HK to only involve candidates China has pre-approved. HK is classified as a SAR (semi-autonomous region) along with places like Macau, part of China's "one-country, two-systems" policy. That means as a HK resident you pay HK taxes and not Chinese taxes. It also means as a HK resident, you follow HK laws and not Chinese laws (an agreement that expires in 2047, and weakened by China's view that anti-secession laws in China still apply to SARs like HK). All that said, HK is not a country, and China's military is stationed in HK. To avoid alarming people, the Chinese military is instructed to dress in a special uniform for HK and not the standard PRC military regalia.

    2. Re:hongkong by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      Sort of, kind of, not really but yes. If you ask people in mainland China then Hong Kong is part of China like any other Chinese city, but they also think Taiwan as part of China so that's not saying much. Ask people from Hong Kong and you get very different answer. The look and feel of the city is completely different from what you find elsewhere in China, even just across the border in Shenzhen. As for the governance, good luck figuring that out, they themselves don't seem to have a very clear picture of how things are or how they are supposed to be. If you ask me then Hong Kong is about as Chinese as it was British when UK still held the lease.

  23. Isn't this how a George Romero movie starts? by Valley+Redneck · · Score: 1

    When there's no room left in Hong Kong, the dead will go to mainland China...

  24. The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been there several times and I have an ex-girlfriend who was born and raised in Guangdong province, which is the part of China just outside Hong Kong and Macau. She and I talked about this. I can't say for all of China, but definitely in Guangdong and Hong Kong and Macau the people there have, by western standards, weird ideas about dead people. There is some real fear of the dead and of ghosts. Of course there is still land in Hong Kong where they could possibly put a cemetery, even if it just was for cremated remains. The real problem is that no Chinese person in Hong Kong wants to live anywhere near a cemetery and they raise holy hell every time any developer tries to put one near where they live. So the upshot is that nobody can ever build a new cemetery anywhere because there isn't any more land that really isn't inhabited by somebody close enough to complain about it. Think of it kind of like trying to build an above ground nuclear waste disposal site and you're really close to the kind of vehement opposition that cemeteries get there. I think it's been well over 10 years, maybe multiple decades, since the last "new" cemetery got opened there and people threw fits about that but it got done anyway. The government simply doesn't want public order disturbed and have the PLA start flexing its muscle so it's just easier to not build new cemeteries so the residents don't complain and if they have to spend many thousands of dollars of money they don't really have to find a place to stash the ashes of Uncle Fong because they are too scared to live near a cemetery that might solve the problem, then that's just how it is. Short of basically having the PLA kill people or throw them in jail if they complain, there's no real solution for this when citizens are convinced that even seeing a cemetery might bring them "bad luck".

    1. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      For a lot of us, PLA is PolyLactic Acid, used to make 3D printer filament.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by budsetr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well there is the answer: put cemeteries in prisons. Added bonus of people being too scared to commit crimes.

    3. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that it's entirely a problem created by some belief system.

      What's the volume of the ashes left behind when someone is sent through a crematorium anyway? I don't think "running out of space" would be anywhere near the problem they're making it out to be if only they came to their senses. Heck, mix it in with concrete (could you even tell it apart from powdered limestone?), you could use a awful lot of it in a single high-rise building.

    4. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      China has land (Hong Kong's population density is 44 times as high as the mainland). Hong Kong has money. Can't they figure out an arrangement to bury Hong Kong's dead on the mainland?

    5. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is sad it has dropped to such an nontechnical level. There was a time when it would have been partial look ahead or programmable logic array.

    6. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is even sadder. Back in the day it stood for parking lot action.

    7. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Or a Programmable Logic Array

    8. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of was the People's Liberation Army.

    9. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      They're already dumping them in Guangzhou, but that's still a three hour one way journey.

    10. Re:The real reason why Hong Kong has no space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in HK for several years, and can tell you from personal experience, having wandered widely throughout the new territories and across several of the outlying islands, that there are ancestors' shrines all over the place. It's harder to avoid them than it is to find them!

      Perhaps, for some, lack of respect for the dead has turned into fear of the angry dead but that's not (or certainly wasn't) the majority view.

      It's also not about space, though I can believe it's all about money. That's a situation that's likely to get worse, as those fearing they might lose their golden goose seek to milk it for all its worth, while they still can (damn, talk about mixed metaphors). With all the uncertainty about HK's future the residents, especially the more marginalised among them, are in for an 'interesting' few years.

  25. Re:We need more fascinating stories like this on S by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

    Slashdot should have been buried long ago as well.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  26. Organ donor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    When I die, my organs will be donated to people who need them. I've specified in my driver's license and my will, that I be an organ donor when I die.

    One organ donor can save eight lives. The wait for a kidney can be 5 or 10 years.

    When I renew my driver's license, I always check the "Yes" box for "Do you want to be an organ donor?"

    1. Re:Organ donor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. And for the parts they don't use, maybe I could be donated to one of those body world exhibits or something. If not, just set me on fire.

  27. The title sounds like a premise for a zombie movie by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Just saying.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  28. Burial at sea. by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

    Hong Kong is a coastal city/region; problem solved.

  29. Bring out ur dead! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    "I'm not dead yet! I feel like dancing!"
    "Can't you come back later?!"

  30. Do you want Soylent Green? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Because that's how you get Soylent Green. /MaloryArcher

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  31. Re:We need more fascinating stories like this on S by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I look forward to future stories on the maiting habits of Australian fruit bats.

    What do you mean? African or European Australian fruit b... D'oh!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  32. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume those countries have at least put into place a 1-child-per-family law to handle this problem. Otherwise anything else they do is a short term non-solution.

  33. Make diamonds by drunken_boxer777 · · Score: 1

    There are a number of companies that will take the ashes from cremation and use them to make a diamond. Wouldn't that be respectful for the ancestor? Turn them into a diamond, make a pendant, and they can be remembered daily. Brings an entirely different meaning to the phrase "family jewels".

  34. Solution: Resurrection Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Launch the remains into a "perpetual orbit of eternal grace" -- The Loved One (1965)

  35. Easy solution: Mix into cement for Worship Homes by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    For millennia, we used to recycle the remains of people. We would bury them, and then when we needed more space, we'd move the bones to ossuaries, then we would use the dust from those bones to make walls with.

    Why not accelerate the process and mix the ashes from the cremated remains into Memorial buildings that are used for ceremonies, like convention centers or other buildings not in continual use, and provide access for those interred in the very building to be remembered according to their religious preferences?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. Personal Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother married a girl from Hong Kong and they live over there. When my brother's father-in-law died, the body was cremated and brought to the USA for burial (cheaper than buying a burial plot in Hong Kong). When his mother-in-law passes, her urn will be next to her husband's.

    In Brazil, the dead are three deep in burial plots and you have no say as to who shares the same vault.

  37. Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a drilling rig, drill and line a hole several hundred feet deep, and stack appropriately sized containers of ashed in it. Profit!

  38. Re:Why is this here? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    I assume those countries have at least put into place a 1-child-per-family law to handle this problem. Otherwise anything else they do is a short term non-solution.

    That's not a solution. Also consider that Singapore has a completely different economic profile than Bangladesh. Ergo, the problems Singapore experiences are differently than Bangladesh' (and Singapore is capable of meet them whereas Bangladesh currently cannot.)

  39. Re:Why is this here? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    It's related to tech through science-fiction writing. Many authors based stories on the prospect of the world running out of space and alternative solutions being found (removing health and safety laws to increase death rates), allowing the population to eliminate each other to get birth permits. Star Wars even had an entire planet based on this problem (Coruscant).

    Some countries like Bangladesh and Singapore have also run out of space. Bangladesh is begging other countries to take their surplus population. Hong Kong already has "coffin apartments".

    One important distinction is that Singapore has a different economic profile than Bangladesh. Singapore's problems are about having a high population density on a small landmass which causes it to spend significantly more from its very rich coffers. OTH, Bangladesh is about high population density on not necessarily a small landmass combined with rampant poverty. Unlike Singapore, Bangladesh cannot meet with the challenges.

    The next stage for them is to start building over the oceans or reclaiming land.

    SK has already done this with Incheon International Airport.

    Japan pulls these moves with even more impressive numbers. Pretty much some nice areas in the Shinagawa district (where I've been, very nice btw) are built on top of reclaimed land over Tokyo Bay. Chubu Centrair International Airport is another example. Everytime I go to Tokyo, the scope of ongoing land reclamation is impressive, almost right out of a sci-fi book.

  40. Good. by hackel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe these idiot Chinese people will enter the 21st century and stop worrying about superstitious nonsense like "disrespecting their ancestor's spirit." I only wish there was a way we could convince all the idiot Christians in the west of this, and outlaw cemeteries once and for all. This is one area where China should exert it's authority over stupid people and require that the bodies be converted into fertilizer to serve the greater good of society in the most environmentally friendly way possible. Cremation releases lots of CO2 and other toxic gasses into the air and is unacceptable.

    1. Re:Good. by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      You know, I used to be with you on this. I'm also an opponent to superstition, but I've grown to actually really like cemeteries - they make great neighbours!

      I think it's dumb to bury bodies, but the cemetery a block from me here in Victoria, BC, is actually a really beautiful spot with lots of big trees, and interesting old tombstones (dating back into the 1800's.) IMO it's a very valuable greenspace, and probably will remain that way for a very long time. (Look up the Ross Bay Cemetery.)

      Overall I'd prefer a park, but this is very nearly that..but with many less people. ;)

      When I lived in Vancouver for a few years, I was also near a cemetery, and really appreciated it for walks, runs, etc.. The rest of my area was houses and busy streets. It was nice to be able to avoid a lot of that and 'get away' a bit just a few blocks away.

      Again, parks would be preferred, but I've come to appreciate the greenspace (at least the one here. I know other cemeteries are much more 'sterile', coming off more as a golf course than anything..bleh..)

      My rambling 2c..

    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe these idiot Chinese people will enter the 21st century and stop worrying about superstitious nonsense like "disrespecting their ancestor's spirit." I only wish there was a way we could convince all the idiot Christians in the west of this, and outlaw cemeteries once and for all. This is one area where China should exert it's authority over stupid people and require that the bodies be converted into fertilizer to serve the greater good of society in the most environmentally friendly way possible. Cremation releases lots of CO2 and other toxic gasses into the air and is unacceptable.

      Christians aren't the only ones who venerate the dead. Most cultures in the world do.

      I belong to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. We believe that at some point our spirits will be reunited with our perfected bodies in the resurrection. For us, resurrection is universal and not limited to just believers. In terms of taking care of our dead, we generally follow whatever society where we live. Chinese Mormons cremate their dead, while most American Mormons are laid to rest in a casket in a cemetery. Mormons are not adverse to organ donations. Scripture tells us that man was created from the dust and will return to dust, so we believe that God won't have a problem re-organizing that crude matter into perfected bodies. Scripture also tells us that not even a single hair from our head will be lost, so it won't matter if we donate an organ. We also like to believe that those born with birth defects or otherwise maimed during this life will be made perfect in the resurrection.

    3. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, old cemeteries are great places. They haven't been destroyed by urban architecture and commerce as much as parks. But reserving all that urban space for a retrograde death cult is a luxury we can't afford anymore.
      My nazi grandparents' remains are buried in a South German town. They've been dead for decades, nobody ever visits the grave, but I'm still forced by law to pay for the lease and gardening. The church (that I haven't been a member of ever since they let me opt out) makes a good profit out of this age-old privilege of running cemeteries. And recently there was a successful referendum against building houses for refugees in a residential area nearby, with the pretext that it would "disturb the peace of the dead" whatever that is.
      I'd say more space for the living, or let cemeteries really overgrow and go back to nature.

  41. Just toss ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... the ashes into the ocean.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  42. Ashes no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make human meats for fishes.

  43. Ask Kim Jong-Un for help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuking Hong Kong can at the same time create plenty of room for burials, and cremate all people at once!

  44. zombie apocalypse NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them walk...and walk...and walk in that dead shuffle gait. Walk

  45. saw it in a documentary film somewhere... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I die, I want to be dismembered and parts of my body surgically implanted in other, still living people. Then my tastes and personality traits can slowly, subtly, influence the recipient -- to commit MURDER!
    That's why I check the box.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:saw it in a documentary film somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that was a documentary....

      [Body Parts trailer]
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGeNnrbKxa4

  46. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's related to tech through science-fiction writing. Many authors based stories on the prospect of the world running out of space and alternative solutions being found (removing health and safety laws to increase death rates), allowing the population to eliminate each other to get birth permits. Star Wars even had an entire planet based on this problem (Coruscant).

    Which makes no damn sense in Star Wars given how easy space travel is there is no reason for so many people to be living on a single planet.

  47. Re:Why is this here? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

    On Earth in the 21st century, travel and communication are cheaper and easier than ever before. Yet an increasing percentage of the population lives in concentrated urban areas. Go figure.

  48. Really? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Don't they have toilets there?

    It all lands in the sea anyway.

  49. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that they have the ability to create Death Stars, that would imply there is some manufacturing plant/planet capable of assembling structures of that size; start with the power plant, basic superstructure, essential maintenance staff quarters, then build outwards. They should be able to build artificial moons that way.

  50. James Bond Was "Buried" in Hong Kong Harbor by glennrrr · · Score: 1

    In You Only Live Twice, Her Royal Navy buried James Bond at sea, the sea being Hong Kong harbor, and he wasn't actually dead.

  51. Re: Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, that's where a lot of jobs, wealth, and services are being concentrated nowadays.

  52. Doesn't work like that.... by gosand · · Score: 1

    Except it doesn't work in reality. See The Ganges.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  53. More babies by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I suppose the answer is to have more babies somehow.

  54. Cement is for soft southern poofters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Wheear 'ast tha bin sin' ah saw thee, ah saw thee?

                            On Ilkla Mooar baht 'at

                    Wheear 'ast tha bin sin' ah saw thee, ah saw thee?
                    Wheear 'ast tha bin sin' ah saw thee?

                            On Ilkla Mooar baht 'at
                            On Ilkla Mooar baht 'at
                            On Ilkla Mooar baht 'at

                    Tha's been a cooartin' Mary Jane

                    Tha's bahn' to catch thy deeath o' cowd

                    Then us'll ha' to bury thee

                    Then t'worms'll come an' eyt thee oop

                    Then t'ducks'll come an' eyt up t'worms

                    Then us'll go an' eyt up t'ducks

                    Then us'll all ha' etten thee

                    That's wheear we get us ooan back

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  55. Zombie movie quoute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When there's no more room for the dead they'll start coming back. Although I probably paraphrased that since it's a while since I've seen that movie.

  56. Paying for your superstitions by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    If you harbor a number of superstitions, and you are willing to pay top dollar for their sake - you are thoroughly stupid. But, by all means, pay through the nose.

  57. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they're going to have to finally reconsider their fucking retarded superstitions. Fuck these people. Fuck everyone who thinks like them.

  58. Re:We need more fascinating stories like this on S by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

    Some background reading so that you can appear knowledgeable when my articles finally get through the editorial filters ;)

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  59. Re:Why is this here? by Gussington · · Score: 1

    The next stage for them is to start building over the oceans or reclaiming land.

    Most of the Hong Kong harbour front is already on reclaimed land. The airport was built on a man made island...

  60. Japan pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes you think HK doesn't already do this? Remember HK is just a richer part of China, and China make islands in the sea.

    1. Re:Japan pffft by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      What makes you think HK doesn't already do this? Remember HK is just a richer part of China, and China make islands in the sea.

      Where did I say that I *thought* HK doesn't already do it?

    2. Re:Japan pffft by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Actually, didn't the new HK airport built shortly before HK returning to China use reclaimed land?

  61. I'm sorry but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a GRAVE situation. I'm sorry.

  62. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To whoever modded me -1, answer this, was my post off topic? Was it flamebait? Ask yourself honestly, what about it deserved a -1 beyond "I don't like your post"?

    It's because you ask too many fucking questions.

  63. Re:Why is this here? by X10 · · Score: 1

    You mean, one-death-per-family?

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  64. Renewable energy by X10 · · Score: 1

    Just cremate people in power plants.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  65. Ashes Export Ltd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever there are humans with distinctive predictable behaviour which isn't initiated by external influence (coercion or bribery) upon those people, there is money to be made on those suckers!

  66. Re:Why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singapore is essentially a city state. It has an annual economic growth rate of 10% as they are the cargo gateway between Asian countries and the rest of the world. Everything is built up into high-rise apartments and office blocks. Those that can afford to, live in the city. Everyone else has to commute from the South Coast of Malaysia via a bridge (like San Franscico and Marin County).

  67. In orther news by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    Hong kong becomes the first produser of Soylent Green, line up now for you weekly rashon

  68. Answer Finally Revealed by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Mandatory cremation after 6 years?

    Now we know why Hong Kong has never had a vampire problem.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  69. Cremate it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cremate it!!!
    Cremate it!!!
    Cremate it!!!
    Cremate it!!!