Slashdot Mirror


Some Pixel 2 Users Are Complaining About A High-Pitched Whine and Clicking Noises (arstechnica.com)

After dealing with all sorts of screen issues, another problem with Google's flagship smartphone is popping up. This time it's an audio issue: users on Google's official forums and elsewhere are reporting odd sounds coming from the Pixel 2 speakers. Ars Technica reports: Customers are complaining of "clicking" and a "high-pitched whine" coming from the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL. Most reports on the forums say the noises are coming from the top or bottom speaker on the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL. Some reports say the sounds come through during calls, while other users say the speaker noises happen any time the screen is on. A user made a recording of the sound, which can be heard here. Most users are being told to return their devices after contacting support, but at least one person claims they were told this issue would be patched in an upcoming update. One possible workaround is to turn off NFC, which some users say stops or lowers the noises.

105 comments

  1. Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember when Apple using quality DACs inside the iPod was a big fucking deal.

    These days, it's all disposable junk. All of it. Every single device is manufactured to accept whatever substitute components are available this week, and it's a total crap shoot as to whether or not you'll get something with issues or not. Apple, Google, HTC, Samsung, doesn't matter. You get to pay a premium for a handheld device that's designed to be obsolete in 2-3 years, AND you get to play the game where you're looking for a decent unit with no screen tinting, bad DACs or electrical interference, defective switches, connectors, etc, etc, etc. Companies aren't competing to build the best device anymore- they're competing to build the cheapest shittiest junk they can, and then they turn around and try to sell it for the highest possible price.

    Welcome to a digital world ruled by shareholders, where the only objective is to make more money. Gone are the days where people wanted to design a better product, and money was just a side effect of succeeding at that.

    1. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2-3 years? You are quite an optimist.

    2. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by batukhan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gone are the days where people wanted to design a better product, and money was just a side effect of succeeding at that.

      While I generally agree, I wish someone from the 1920s would see this comment. The wizards from the future whine how their magic boxes can't be held to their ridiculously high standard. Gone are the days where everything was universally shitty. Instead everything is a slight variation of absolutely amazing. That said, coil whine drives me crazy.

    3. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by sad_ · · Score: 1

      indeed, that's why every premium phone isn't worth the money.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    4. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gone are the days where people wanted to design a better product, and money was just a side effect of succeeding at that.

      Those people still exist and they have as much say in anything as they ever had: not a lot. A person who made and makes products to sell always had and has money on their mind.

    5. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      If the design is sound (meaning has accounted for worst-case tolerances) then proper testing will detect most problems, regardless of how "cheap" the component manufacturer is. (A handful of problems are problematic regardless of testing, such as capacitor and battery failures over a period of time due to poor manufacturing quality.)

      The real problem IMO is design shortcuts made for a variety of reasons, ranging from designer incompetence to cost, combined with inadequate testing. For example, a digital circuit designer may not have adequate knowledge of "analog" design issues such as proper grounding techniques. As someone who used to be involved in automated testing, I've seen many designs that work with typical component values but not worst-case. More than once I've been instructed to tweak tests to achieve an acceptably low failure rate, with the manufacturer hoping that the end user wouldn't typically experience the failure mode (due to say temperature and power supply voltage fluctuations).

    6. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I only buy "middle tier" phone, unlocked. If I had to buy a phone right now it would be the Moto G5S Plus, saw it for $279 and can be on sale at 229.
      It has a 5.5" screen, 1080p, 5GHz wifi, SD card, NFC, quick charge, dual camera, fingerprint scanner, etc. The whole shebang, everything you need.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      I remember when Apple using quality DACs inside the iPod was a big fucking deal.

      These days, it's all disposable junk. All of it. Every single device is manufactured to accept whatever substitute components are available this week, and it's a total crap shoot as to whether or not you'll get something with issues or not. Apple, Google, HTC, Samsung, doesn't matter. You get to pay a premium for a handheld device that's designed to be obsolete in 2-3 years, AND you get to play the game where you're looking for a decent unit with no screen tinting, bad DACs or electrical interference, defective switches, connectors, etc, etc, etc. Companies aren't competing to build the best device anymore- they're competing to build the cheapest shittiest junk they can, and then they turn around and try to sell it for the highest possible price.

      Welcome to a digital world ruled by shareholders, where the only objective is to make more money. Gone are the days where people wanted to design a better product, and money was just a side effect of succeeding at that.

      This is exactly what happens when you have a brand worth more than the product itself. Samsung, Apple, and Google have developed their brand to the point where their names are what sells the shit. Furthermore, they discovered that they could create a vertical market off of people's dissatisfaction. They can introduce paid support to additionally monetize fixing said shitty product. Of course, this only goes so far because if the product is too shitty, they face backlash from government regulatory agencies. Yet even these fines are considered the cost of doing business and rarely do significant long term injury. Hell, Samsung's recent Galaxy Note snafu is but a distant, long-forgotten memory.

    8. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I remember when Apple using quality DACs inside the iPod was a big fucking deal.

      You remember when, but do you remember why? The first generation iPod was grilled for being horrible and anemic with measurements showing how lack of capacitance near the amplifying components contributed to it being unable to produce any satisfactory dynamics.

      The first gen iPod only had it's library size as its "deal" and the Diamond Rios shat all over the frist gen iPod in audio quality.
      The second gen iPod changed the focus towards quality of audio.
      The first gen Shuffle was equally grilled for poor audio quality.

    9. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      The flagship level phones sell because they try to capitalize on the well known marketing psychology of Fear Of Missing Out. People that are insecure and vulnerable believe that they will somehow be the envy of their social circles if they just had the best bling on the block. Samsung and Apple love these types of people - they cost a whole lot less to retain during the life of a product line. All these people have to do is hear about the next iteration of the Galaxy S or iPhone lines and they're impossibly hooked. In order to squeeze the most profit out of this, manufacturing and components go to China. Basically, this is all proof that even a turd can be polished, due credit to Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman.

    10. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I only buy "middle tier" phone, unlocked. If I had to buy a phone right now it would be the Moto G5S Plus, saw it for $279 and can be on sale at 229. It has a 5.5" screen, 1080p, 5GHz wifi, SD card, NFC, quick charge, dual camera, fingerprint scanner, etc. The whole shebang, everything you need.

      I don't even buy the middle tier phone. I buy the higher-end budget phone. I honestly don't see the problem of paying for shit the old-fashioned way by whipping out a credit card or cash. NFC is an interesting fad which I really think people use to look cool. I would argue that it is insecure as hell and anyone with the right technology could simply intercept the exchange.

    11. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Yeah but as long as they're pretty...

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    12. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      More to the point this stuff is getting more and more general purpose. These Smart Phones are more small tablet computers with telephone as one of its features in it. These new devices in a 5" screen have a 2k multi-touch display, advanced camera's, bio-metric readers, GPS, motion and gyroscope sensors multiple forms of wireless stuff, with a CPU and GPU which can rival modern mid range laptops. . A battery big enough to keep it running all day. In a form factor that is thinner then the plastic of the case covering my first computer.

      The rush to get features in such a small form factor to make it to snub their noes at their Competition showing how they have on paper the better device means a lot of trade offs That Quality DAC could have cost an hour of battery life (with extra size, and may need more power) or add a few bucks to the total cost.
      Being that Google wants to show that their phone is just as good if not better as the upcoming iPhone X but cost less they will need to to be picky on some of the lesser components. It appears that they may had went too far with the DAC.

      However never fear Android Fans, the iPhone X will be released in a couple weeks and what ever problem it has will allow you great rejoicing in the knowledge that you had made a wise purchasing decision. As the Apple Fans will greatly rejoice knowing that Android phones have their own sets of problems reinforcing their belief that they had made a wise purchasing decision. While in the grand scheme of things, it really doesn't make much difference, because they are actually both equally averaged specked products at about the same price. It is just some features are better then others depending on how you use the device.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      You get to pay a premium for a handheld device that's designed to be obsolete in 2-3 years,

      Your phone is not obsolete after 2-3 years. They market new phones as making old ones obsolete; in truth, the device in your pocket right now will probably still not be obsolete in 10 years. The battery may suck, but the phone will probably still be good enough.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    14. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Jfetjunky · · Score: 1

      If people knew the crap mobile device manufacturers had to do just to make the tiny, barely speakers actually act like anything resembling the behavior you'd expect from a speaker, a DAC would be the least of their worries.

      Audio is a race to the bottom right now, especially in the consumer space. Super high integration (read: tiny) and cost are the key drivers because of mobile electronics.

      A lack of understanding of just how much components can differ, usually passive components, can turn a decent design into a yield nightmare. Take the humble capacitor for instance. If you don't understand the dielectric type you are using, you are in for it. The "specs" of the cap will likely guarantee you very little. You design your power supply expecting a loss of about 30% of capacitance at the output voltage. Then you switch manufacturers with a slightly different dielectric chemistry (or your manufacturer simply modifies their chemistry) and you lost 50% and your power supply suddenly becomes an oscillator. Too bad, the specs only guaranteed capacitance variation over temp. They give no guarantees on capacitance change with bias voltage. Ask me how I know... These are hard learned lessons for any design engineer serious about electronics.

    15. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not poor. If I hold on to a phone for a couple years it becomes something like a dollar/day, which is the amount of money I earn in about 40 seconds.

      Cheaper phones are visibly slower, take noticeably worse photos. Sure, they do 75% of the job for 25% of the cost. But I use my cell phone a lot. If I save 40 seconds a day not dealing with a POS phone, it's worth it to me. I have a DSLR, but realistically a lot of the pictures of my infant son are taken with my phone, and that's worth something to me as well.

      From looking at your post history, you are unemployed and can't find a job. Sorry to hear that dude, but you should preface any statement about getting value from money with "I am unemployed and my priorities are totally different."

    16. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] These days, it's all disposable junk. All of it. Every single device is manufactured to accept whatever substitute components are available this week, and it's a total crap shoot as to whether or not you'll get something with issues or not. Apple, Google, HTC, Samsung, doesn't matter. You get to pay a premium for a handheld device that's designed to be obsolete in 2-3 years, AND you get to play the game where you're looking for a decent unit with no screen tinting, bad DACs or electrical interference, defective switches, connectors, etc, etc, etc. Companies aren't competing to build the best device anymore- they're competing to build the cheapest shittiest junk they can, and then they turn around and try to sell it for the highest possible price. [...]

      The Google Pixel series of phones was cobbled together specifically for a 'Mr. Big' operation, being conducted by various LEAs. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Big_%28police_procedure%29

    17. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      NFC is an interesting fad which I really think people use to look cool.

      My camera can uses NFC to set up a Wi-Fi network to transfer pictures to my phone. I've used that a bunch. Mind you, my most recent phone actually has a pretty decent camera, so I have somewhat less need for it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    18. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to a digital world ruled by shareholders, where the only objective is to make more money. Gone are the days where people wanted to design a better product, and money was just a side effect of succeeding at that.

      Sounds like you've identified the basis for a new business! All you Free Marketeers out there -- here's your chance to make gazillions! Just develop a quality phone from quality components! That's what people wil buy if only they have the chance! The Free Market will solve this problem!

      Oh wait, people want the cheapest thing possible. Nevermind.

    19. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to a digital world ruled by shareholders, where the only objective is to make more money.

      Thanks Obama!

    20. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      People that are insecure and vulnerable believe that they will somehow be the envy of their social circles if they just had the best bling on the block.

      There's something to be said about people that need to categorize anyone with different buying habits as "insecure and vulnerable". I'd recommend ruminating a bit on the utter relativity of wealth. Where do you fit in? What would a poor person in Myanmar say about your spending habits?

    21. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      the device in your pocket right now will probably still not be obsolete in 10 years.

      Unless you include planned obsolescence. It's a lot of work keeping a phone patched with security updates when the manufacturer stops after 2-3 years.

    22. Re:Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat drink and be merry for tomorrow we may die. = Enjoy what you have and can afford now, for the republicans are coming for your social security and 401k.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. I'm never buying flagship phones again by Kokuyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least if I don't have to for some reason. I'm so happy with my medium priced Lenovo P2 it's unreal...

    I think as soon as there is a style value attached to a product buying from market leaders in the top tier is just asking for trouble nowadays... Perhaps the thinking is that if someone is dumb enough to spend X times 2 on a product that does similar things as another costing X, then they have to be stupid enough to accept mediocre quality.

    The bottom line is blown up.

    Perhaps the midrange has to be better quality because whoever isn't dumb enough to go for the shiny and doesn't just buy on the cheap is usually a person who has done their research?

    1. Re:I'm never buying flagship phones again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "research" my ass. You just picked the stupid thing because it was cheap and had less of useless components like NFC, super charging, multiple stupid speakers, extra slim battery.

      What "research" really means - "it comprises "creative work undertaken on a systematic basis to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of humans, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications."

      Did you increase any fucking culture by buying your stupid phones, you dumbfucking millennials?

    2. Re:I'm never buying flagship phones again by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      "research" my ass. You just picked the stupid thing because it was cheap and had less of useless components like NFC, super charging, multiple stupid speakers, extra slim battery.

      What "research" really means - "it comprises "creative work undertaken on a systematic basis to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of humans, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications."

      Did you increase any fucking culture by buying your stupid phones, you dumbfucking millennials?

      Mod this one up! The whole reason for me buying my higher-end budget phone is that I can dispense with the fucking useless NFC. All NFC does is look cool. I'll stick to cash and credit cards because the old fashioned way works just fine. For me a phone is for talking, text messages, weather, news, music, and occasionally for directions. I don't do social media anymore, and believe me, it felt good to tell Zuck to eat a dick by closing my facebook account. Really, smartphones do anything but make phone calls well.

    3. Re:I'm never buying flagship phones again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant believe these stupid cars with electric starters, real men crank their car by hand!

    4. Re:I'm never buying flagship phones again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much choice is there. Either you buy top of the line or run the risk of unknown companies knowingly or unknowingly running crapware. Lenovo is no exception. I prefer to buy second hand items from the flagship companies. I am still using iPhone 6 plus bought from a coworker two years ago.

  4. Solutions by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    One possible workaround is to turn off NFC, which some users say stops or lowers the noises.

    Turning off the phone completely might stop or lower the noises even more, but I think the embedded surveillance device, actually generating the noise, is always active, unless you take out the battery - oh wait...

    [ Obviously, I think I mean this to be funny, but seriously don't even know anymore. Both Google *and* the Government would really like to have always-on tracking and surveillance. /tin-foil-phone-cozy ]

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Solutions by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 0

      Give your kids some sweets and stop giving them toy guns might work even better still

    2. Re:Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurr hurr hurr! OMG this post was teh funnay!! NOT.

  5. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, to be fair, Google's support has traditionally been crap. This has been true since Google started selling non-electronic stuff.

    Google, it seems, can sling electrons around like the best of them. But atoms? forget it. Heck, I've ordered stuff through Google, and had it take far longer to arrive to me than someone who went to the store and bought it.

    Getting someone on the phone is a novelty to Google - I still remember when your (only) support option was Google Groups.

    And as much as you fault Apple, you have to remember Apple's support has traditionally been among the best of everyone. Perhaps not as good as Amazon where it seems everyone is empowered to do anything to make you happy, but still seemingly non-useless (aside from the few incidents that get well-reported because well, Apple news is money making news).. Not that Apple is a saint in the support department - they only recently opened an official Apple Support twitter account, which is like 10 years after everyone else. And they have a nasty habit with the delete button on their forums.

    But Google? Well, old school support options they generally suck at. For stuff like this, you're actually better off waiting for the official Google blog to announce something than trust what support says.

  6. So they been beta testing pixel 2 in the Havana em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess we know now how those diplomats got hearing issues- they were all using a preproduction pixel devices.

  7. Do the Cuban diplomats have these? by ecloud · · Score: 2

    Maybe that explains it...

    1. Re:Do the Cuban diplomats have these? by anddna · · Score: 1

      Anybody missed that story? ...this noises

  8. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    It's all rumor and hearsay, with some agents saying it'll be fixed in an upcoming patch, others (like mine) saying they've never heard of it and are not allowed to look up news stories about it.

    Eh?!?!?! That sounds quite Monty Pythonesque: "You're not allowed to enter the room . . . "

    I've heard of all kinds of screwball restrictions on what support folks can do . . . but reading the news . . . ? Oh, my God . . . by reading the news, the support folks might learn the smarts! Then they will organize a union or form a pitchforks and torches gang!

    Again, back to the Python: "I could be arguing in my spare time!" . . . "I could be reading the news in my spare time!"

    It's all rumor and hearsay

    Yeah, that pretty much sums up what the cell phone market is . . . and all it ever will be.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  9. Re: I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I've ordered stuff through Google, and had it take far longer to arrive to me than someone who went to the store and bought it."

    Oh really? I wonder how that happened.

  10. Do Google learn from Nexus??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The bigger problem here is Google don't learn from Nexus devices. They order them, they sell them, and each time a new set of problems appear caused by the overlap between the Google design and the current manufacturer.

    In case you didn't know, Pixel2's biggest problem is it snaps easily, because the weak point in the case where the switches are, happens to also be where they the plastic cover for the antennas connects to the back body.

    A combination of the circuit board designer (some outside company), the stylist (probably Google person), and the mechanical/testing people (the phone manufacturer) being all disconnected and separate.

    Each time they change manufacturers the overlap is different and a new set of problems are revealed. Which is great for the company whose learning (the phone company), since they're making the mistakes at Googles expense not their own, damaging Google's brand, not their own.

    Are Google actually learning something from these Nexus Pixel devices, or is it just an exercise in hubris? Because none of their tablets or phones sells in large volumes, and they don't seem to address the problems with any of them in the next generation. Would it really kill them to add a microSD card? Would it really kill them to make a big tablet that doesn't rotate vertically if you open snapchat? Yet they don't learn from each failure.

    1. Re:Do Google learn from Nexus??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Absolute truth here, should be up voted. Coming from someone else who worked on phones at one point and has a long standing history of designing electronics for high-volume manufacturing.

      I have three Nexus 4 devices, two with battery charging issues, audio mic gain issues which Google (LG) never addressed. Nexus 5 reportedly has its own set of issues...the trend continues.

      But, the products are getting sold and someone is making money. Google is the new MSFT.

    2. Re:Do Google learn from Nexus??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish they'd care as much about engineering as they do about being PC.

      Let me guess, they hired a team of engineers equally represented by ethnicity and gender identity to design the device? Good fucking job Google I'm glad you're so progressive. Too bad your shit doesn't work because oh yeah, turns out engineers have to know things.

      You'd think people would have learned this from equifax.

  11. Hahaha by geekymachoman · · Score: 0

    It's just funny.

  12. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google's support for everything has always been the worst out there, because for the most part they don't even have any. I've got a gmail account that I've been using for at least 7 years as a "send mail as" account but lost the password to and can't recover. There's literally no way for me to speak to any human being at google in any way to fix this. Any human could take one look at the system and see it's consistently been used for almost a decade, but all they've got is the terribly designed users-only forum.

    At least Valve pretends to have some semblance of customer service.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  13. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you call it best, when the answer is "you are doing it wrong, won't fix?"

  14. Users Are Complaining About A High-Pitched Whine by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Does the high-pitched whine stop for a while if you stop complaining?"

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  15. I'd have more concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the complaints weren't all being filed by iphone IPs.

  16. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the next stage of capitalism comrade.

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  17. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Studies show that when an answer, even an unwelcome one, is delivered in an authoritative tone by an attractive Millennial with a septum piercing the user will get back into line and realise it is they who are at fault.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  18. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

    There is an opinion on the Verge about how everybody has dud products once in a while... but at this point in a product, when you're building your brand in a new area, can easily taint the reputation permanently and kill off the entire project.

    https://www.theverge.com/2017/...

  19. Companies... by asylumx · · Score: 2

    Companies aren't competing to build the best device anymore- they're competing to build the cheapest shittiest junk they can, and then they turn around and try to sell it for the highest possible price.

    I laugh every time I see something like this. As though that hasn't *always* been the goal of for-profit companies...

    1. Re:Companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry for you if you did not live in the era when i.e. washing machines and TVs were built to last, because quality was how companies got to attract and keep their customers. Truly sorry.

    2. Re: Companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to be sorry. That was an era where you couldn't afford a 2nd tv or whatever you need.

      I'm happy to be in this era where I can have new shiny stuff all the time at a fraction of the cost. Trust me.... the premium you paid for the quality of old isn't worth it.

    3. Re:Companies... by Hodr · · Score: 1

      You should watch AVE on Youtube to a teardown of an older piece of gear built for quality. Aluminum or steel gears instead of plastic, sealed bearings, actuators made to last for 10's of millions of movements instead of 10's of thousands. Easily replaceable beefy brushes in the motors. beefy wiring on the stator that has been properly affixed, high temperature high strength plastics and resins. Cases that bolt together rather than clip.

      Believe it or not there was a time when a products endurance was a high selling feature, rather than just bling or cost. You bought one to last forever and the company was happy to try and sell one to everyone, rather than sell multiple to some subset of people willing to keep rebuying the same engineered to fail crap.

    4. Re: Companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate these shitty people who whine incessantly about the good old days.... just fuck off already.

    5. Re:Companies... by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And at the same time, those products were out of reach to many people; lowering the quality to reasonable bounds often resulted in something massively more attainable that only actually breaks marginally more often than the original. Its easy to look at the past with rose colored glasses, but the era of "indestructible" washing machines was also the era of poor people washing clothes by hand and frequent visits from your local washing machine repair man (who could indeed repair the washing machine, but was required to do so far more often).

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    6. Re:Companies... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      When washing machines and TVs were built to last, because quality was how companies got to attract and keep their customers.

      Oh, I member! /SouthPark

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:Companies... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2


      Factor in the price, and energy consumption savings of a modern appliance, and it can last about 1/6th as long and still be the same value.  So, your 1980s dishwasher crapped out after a whopping 20 years, that means my 2015 model only needs to last 3.5 years.  I guess I'll be buying a new one next year.

      "The average dishwasher today is not only more than twice as energy-efficient as a comparable 1981 model, but its real cost today is only about 50% of the price of the 1981 dishwasher, measured in hours worked at the average hourly wage. Put those two factors together, and the average American’s dishwasher today is about six times superior to the dishwasher of thirty years ago"

      source:  http://www.aei.org/publication/when-it-comes-to-home-appliances-the-good-old-days-are-now-theyre-cheaper-better-more-energy-efficient-than-ever/

    8. Re:Companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now we just throw the washing machines nebput.

      I had a Kawasaki still that was given to me as a gift, it worked for a year and then the chuck stopped working and it had really bad runout.

      After watching one of ave’s Drill tear down videos I understood the points of failure. I bought a drill from a halfway decent manufacturer and it has been awesome! (Makita, still made in Japan not just a badge sold to a conglomerate)

    9. Re: Companies... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No need to be sorry. That was an era where you couldn't afford a 2nd tv or whatever you need.

      I'm happy to be in this era where I can have new shiny stuff all the time at a fraction of the cost. Trust me.... the premium you paid for the quality of old isn't worth it.

      It was an era when you could afford a house, a car or two, a spouse who didn't have to work, 2 or 3 kids, a dog, annual vacations, medical expenses, retirement (often with a pension), etc., all with a high school education. Being poor meant you had a single car, limited yourself to only 1 kid (or you had too many), your spouse may have had to have a at-home job or part time job and you had shitty vacations or no vacations. Being broke meant you had to move in with family until you got another job.

      It was also an era where most households didn't really see a point in having 2 TVs.

    10. Re: Companies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      the premium you paid for the quality of old isn't worth it.

      Not sure that's true. A TV that lasts 20 years may cost 3 times the price way back when, but a TV that lasts 5 years has to be replaced 4 times as often.

      We have LED backlights now, but my current TV is still a CCFL and it's only a matter of time before it goes. And I'm not going to try to replace that bulb - it's too hard.

  20. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    I believe these were the ones made in Cuba!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  21. They found us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alien Invasion!

  22. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah... I mean who the fuck uses an phone older than that?

    I mean it's sooo embarrassing.... that's like wearing a tag that say "I'm homeless" or something.....

    That's not to insult homeless people.... I mean using a 2 year old phone.... man that's something....

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the exact opposite of how Apple, and to a certain extent, Samsung, operate. Apple famously pits manufacturers against each other. If the components arenâ(TM)t meeting spec, theyâ(TM)re sent back, at the manufacturerâ(TM)s cost. The whole reason why the iPhone X is reportedly supply constrained is because the dot projector is hard to make and Apple keeps sending them back.

    Theyâ(TM)re not faultless, but in general, the components you get in an iPhone are the best ones that can be sourced from anyone.

    Samsung has done some dumb things, even in recent memory, but itâ(TM)s hard to deny that theyâ(TM)re nearly always the SOURCE of the highest end parts. I have no love for them, but they make the best screens, have high quality chip fabs, etc. Iâ(TM)ll give Samsung a lot of grief for being a thieving garbage company with immoral leadership, but their high end parts are legitimately well made.

    Only Apple has the scale to operate like they do, and only Samsung can build parts as well as they do, and the rest fight for scraps at the margins.

  25. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by rjstanford · · Score: 2

    Electrons too these days. Silly case in point:

    Google decided to release a product to build goodwill - the featured photos screensaver for OSX. Nice. Its well done, and displays their logo quietly in conference rooms, etc, all over the place.

    It doesn't work properly with the most recent release of the OS. They still offer it, it just no longer works, has no support, and has apparently been orphaned.

    Now, are they obligated to keep a marketing offering up-to-date? No, of course not, but that kind of attitude even in a simple digital product makes me far less likely to trust them for more expensive goods, whether physical or virtual. What GAE API will be the next to get silently deprecated?

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  26. In summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an excellent phone to look at if keep it powered off. Pure dark screen, no whining noise, no interference,...

  27. What I don't get at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is consumerism at its best.... I just ordered and waited 40 days for a xaomi Redmi Note 4.... Costs 1/6th the price, it's got a excellent battery, no hum, no screen issues, is fast enough to do pretty much everything...... Granted this u still considered low end, but is feature rich and does everything I want, the pixel bring cutting edge is more like owning a apple expensive bleeding edge that is so great I don't get even a analogue headphone jack or a SD slot? So they can make it ultra slim crap. A oled with chronic issues, but bleeding edge, this is just a phone for rich peoples bragging rights that is all..... If you need to buy or spend this much give your head a shake and get a life they love you though......... I'm glad they have issues because it won't effect me and even if I was rich I'd avoid bleeding and cutting edge and get a phone that was designed for the masses rather than the riches......

    1. Re: What I don't get at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also to add to this I don't care how good a camera is on a cell phone it is only a convenience and not something that will wow anyone we have dslrs for a reason you can't shrink a high quality lens down to those minute sizes let alone sensors that size and expect high quality, cell phone photos will always be that. This whole thing is laughable.....

  28. What is that woman angry about ? by satan666 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one here who, after listening to the recording made by that user, had a second recording play, where some woman was angry about something??? WTF!!!

    1. Re:What is that woman angry about ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did something wrong to her, satan666, so you should call her back to talk it over.

  29. Cuba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at it again.

    god damn.

  30. Its the OLED pixels by SalsaDot · · Score: 2

    Its the OLED pixels screaming in pain as they get burnt in.

  31. DON'T buy 1st production run by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Phones. Typically, they have a glitch here or there. I always wait, and buy the LAST of "this years" model. Bugs are gone, software is usually as up to date as it will be (android outside google phones). The best part, usually a LOT LESS cost.

  32. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess I've gotten to "that age" but I couldn't care less about something like that. I've learned to understand that anyone that thinks that way is a complete a-hole and their opinions suddenly stop mattering to me. Think what you want about my old phone, but I couldn't give 2 shits about what you think.

  33. comparison by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    First of all, it's obviously the aliens from Signs. Second, I can't remember a nice quality high end desktop that had a defect rate similar to that of phones. Laptops maybe depending on brand but not desktops and certainly not custom-built ones. Considering phones cost double in some cases, this is pretty pathetic.

  34. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he was clearly using sarcasm...

    anyway.. not a single phone has been made in 2016 or 2017 that is a better product than Samsung Galaxy Note 4 or BlackBerry Priv... Untill then, I will continue to use my 2+ year old phones :-)

  35. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately most of what you say is not true.

  36. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the next stage of capitalism comrade.

    Still better than any stage of communism or socialism.

  37. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    If the phones suddenly start making "Eh?" noises, they're probably made in Canada.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  38. Cuba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now we know what happened in the US embassy in Cuba, clearly the diplomats had been outfitted with new Google phones.

  39. Where was the Pixel 2 designed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it designed in Cuba?

  40. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck? Every manufacturer tries to get the best out of their sources. If Apple is famous for this, please link to a single article about how they are famous for this (protip: you can't).

  41. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    Apple almost always has two sources for its components, and this is well known. They had three manufacturers trying to make the dot projector on the iPhone X, they have TMSC AND Samsung fabbing SoCs, etc. Apple rarely single-sources components because it drives prices up. The screen in the iPhone X is a rare exception, but as we've seen from the Pixel XL debacle, LG isn't really up to making high quality OLED screens on mobile yet.

    This is all entirely public knowledge. If Apple can't get the prices and components they want out of a manufacturer, they'll dump them in a hot second for someone that says they can.

  42. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    That's a convincing rebuttal, commenter with no name or sources.

  43. Super Useless by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    and its customer service is super friendly and super useless

    Well to be fair you can't expect much from customer support when it's all people who chose to take their 20% of free time handling Pixel hardware calls.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  44. Power rail noise? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    My first thought is a noisy power rail and analog components (DACs, preamps, power amps, etc) that have poor PSRR (power supply rejection ratio), and the noise is getting amplified.

  45. Pixel XL does it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put the volume on low and play a song from internal storage. You will hear tons of static as the electronics that read the internal storage cause interference on the speaker circuit.

  46. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I know you're trying to be friendly and empathetic

    This gives me the shits with modern customer service. I had this with Microsoft. It took 5 fucking minutes to get past the:
    "We're sorry to hear you're having a problem."
    "This is not the experience I want you to have with our device."
    "We will try everything possible to get your problem fixed."
    "We can offer services in multiple countries." ...
    "What are you calling about today?"

    Fuck off! Say: "Hi" Let me tell you the problem, and either present me a very sane option to fix it or give me an RMA number. Nothing more nothing less. I certainly don't give a shit what *you* Mr $1/hr Indian support keyboard monkey thinks about my experience, and I know for a fact you don't care either.

    It's quite sad that we live in a world where I now thank people who don't offer this friendly bullshit.

  47. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    This has been true since Google started selling non-electronic stuff.

    Err. No this has been true since Larry Page and Sergey Brin hacked together a ranking system in their garage. Google's customer service has been utter shite from even its early search days long before they started selling anything.

  48. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I buy used phones, 1-2 years old. Swap in a new battery for $20 and I'm good to go. I just got a nice galaxy s7 active for $90 off ebay. It's good enough for me and will be for the next year or two. It's just not that big a deal, I'd rather save money for another new Tesla.

  49. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lul. A fool and his money part ways. As the old saying goes.

  50. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Apple sell so many iPhones if people want the cheapest thing possible? Your theory doesn't hold up.

  51. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Why not save on your Tesla the same way? Buy it used on eBay, swap in a $9,000 battery and you're good to go.

  52. Clicks? I hear car horns! And an angry woman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beeeeep! . . . . . . Beeeep! . . . . . . . . Beeeeeeep!

  53. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to see you logged into to make your response, cause your first post was screwed up by your iPhone in unreadable in its current form.

    I mean the story right now is saying that they are getting behind and are willing to compromise quality, but you trot in and extol the virtues of Apple being top quality.

        Log off of your daddys /. account and grow up a bit.

  54. Re:I'm less concerned about the actual noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an old timer having used punch cards as well. I have seen HP going through this transformation as well. Google and FB are AOL of the future.

  55. 50kHz on my LG phone by dfsmith · · Score: 1

    I was testing some components (class D amplifier) and wanted a quick signal source, so I hooked up my phone. I was quite surprised (and concerned) to discover that my LG G6 is pumping out a VERY LOUD signal at 50kHz. I can't hear that high (I stop at about 12kHz now), and earbuds will attenuate it quite a bit, but I imagine it could still cause hearing loss. (BTW, I was looking for ~250kHz noise in the amplifier, but that component was attenuating correctly. It faithfully reproduced the 50kHz whine, however.)

    I won't be listening to music on this phone... now I have to test my other phones.

  56. Re: Shit components assembled by the lowest bidder by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I really AM old enough to have the 4-digit UID that I'm sporting.

    In any case, the story about them compromising quality has been denied, and perhaps you could call that obvious or inevitable, but Apple rarely comments on stories at all.

    I haven't seen any evidence that Apple uses anything other than the highest possible quality parts, going so far as to not source parts from a company that they've given millions of dollars to (LG) so they can get OLED panels from a major competitor (Samsung).

    There are bound to be some edge cases, but it's incredibly hard to argue that Apple doesn't use the best components it can get its hands on (at scale), and that Samsung doesn't manufacture the best parts (at scale).

    (And don't blame me for /. being so unable to cope with text from an iPhone. I mean, the thing has only been out for 10 goddamn years.)

  57. Game by racknithi · · Score: 1

    perfect line of place Gesture Lock Screen