Slashdot Mirror


EPA Approves Release of Bacteria-Carrying Mosquitoes To 20 States (nature.com)

schwit1 writes: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved the use of a common bacterium to kill wild mosquitoes that transmit viruses such as dengue, yellow fever and Zika, Nature's news team has learned. On November 3rd, the agency told biotechnology start-up MosquitoMate that it could release the bacterium Wolbachia pipientis into the environment as a tool against the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus). Lab-reared mosquitoes will deliver the bacterium to wild mosquito populations. The decision -- which the EPA has not formally announced -- allows the company, which is based in Lexington, Kentucky, to release the bacteria-infected mosquitoes in 20 U.S. states and Washington DC.

MosquitoMate will rear the Wolbachia-infected A. albopictus mosquitoes in its laboratories, and then sort males from females. Then the laboratory males, which don't bite, will be released at treatment sites. When these males mate with wild females, which do not carry the same strain of Wolbachia, the resulting fertilized eggs don't hatch because the paternal chromosomes do not form properly. The company says that over time, as more of the Wolbachia-infected males are released and breed with the wild partners, the pest population of A. albopictus mosquitoes dwindles. Other insects, including other species of mosquito, are not harmed by the practice, says Stephen Dobson, an entomologist at the University of Kentucky in Lexington and founder of MosquitoMate.

69 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It’s not like bacteria frequently mutate and jump species!

    And this only makes the entire species go completely extinct! Like in that Star Trek Voyager episode. So fuck the moral implications.

    </sarcasm>

    It will be fun times, when it turns out that humanity really is too dumb to live.

    [CAPTCHA: ending]

  2. Fingers Crossed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Our backyards is full of bloody cane toads at this time of year... I hope they get this one right ;)

  3. I'm actually amazed that this works by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I've read research that this strategy actually works, which is amazing to me.

    There are so many mosquitos, how can they possibly release enough to actually make a difference in the population?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      (a) because breeding captive mosquitoes is not very difficult (though it's not pain free: mosquitoes require a blood meal to reproduce, which often involves a person sticking his/her arm in the cage)

      (b) because if the "sterile males" are released in the right time and place, they outnumber the wild males, so *most* wild females mate with a sterile male; repeated a few times this can actually wipe out the wild population

      (c) but as far as I know, separating captive males and females is not so easy

      Source: I used to work in a tropical medicine institute (but not directly with any mosquitoes).

    2. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by aberglas · · Score: 1

      So, if there are 100 billion wild males, how many sterile ones do you need? A metric shit load?

    3. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Unless they force you to go back, too, that plan is pointless.

    4. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (c) but as far as I know, separating captive males and females is not so easy

      They should have the male work a full-time job while giving the female stay-at-home mosquito an unlimited wine-budget and a sense of superiority. That usually does it in the species I've observed.

    5. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by MangoCats · · Score: 2

      It's targeting a specific species of mosquito, I think part of the effectiveness is reducing that species' competitiveness with other species of mosquito that fill the same niche in the environment.

      End result, you'll still get bitten - but hopefully not Dengue.

    6. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by MangoCats · · Score: 2

      Your tax dollars at work, breeding mosquitoes in the lab by the shit-ton.

    7. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by gtall · · Score: 2

      Your tax dollars at work, countering mosquito born diseases after they've already infected the populace.

    8. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (c) but as far as I know, separating captive males and females is not so easy

      Source: I used to work in a tropical medicine institute (but not directly with any mosquitoes).

      Don't know how it's actually done, but since only females bite, all you should have to do is coat an arm with some sticky glue and let nature follow its course.

    9. Re: I'm actually amazed that this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Compared to treating babies born with microcephelia over their lifetime...seems like a drop in the bucket.

    10. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'd be fine with reverting the females to non-bloodsucking variety. Leave the males as males that cause further devolution.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (a) because breeding captive mosquitoes is not very difficult (though it's not pain free: mosquitoes require a blood meal to reproduce, which often involves a person sticking his/her arm in the cage)

      They don't stick an arm in. They use bladders of blood they hang in the cage.

    12. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Separating them via computer and robot seems like a job awaiting someone.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by MagicM · · Score: 1

      (c) but as far as I know, separating captive males and females is not so easy

      Since the males don't bite, it sounds like you can rig up a fresh side of pork with some automatic fly-swatters, and just kill the ones that land for lunch.

    14. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by brianerst · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that they separate them at the larval stage and there is a size difference - basically pour some water through a sieve and one side has females and the other side has males. It's something like 99.9% effective.

    15. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by chihowa · · Score: 1

      (a) because breeding captive mosquitoes is not very difficult (though it's not pain free: mosquitoes require a blood meal to reproduce, which often involves a person sticking his/her arm in the cage)

      They don't stick an arm in. They use bladders of blood they hang in the cage.

      The technical term for those blood bags is "grad student".

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    16. Re:I'm actually amazed that this works by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      If the diseases in question travel from mosquito to human (well, mammal) and then back to mosquito, but not from human to human, even if the whole population is infected with all of these disease then suppression of the mosquitoes would still be an effective way of clearing the population of these diseases.

      I think that Zika has rare human-human (sexual) transmission. But even that doesn't obviate the validity of the approach.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Mosquitos are anoying, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weren't we thaught in school not to mess with the ecosystems and let nature run its course? else we might risk exterminating some species by mistake?

    1. Re: Mosquitos are anoying, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mosquitoes are God's creatures. Don't fuck with them.

    2. Re: Mosquitos are anoying, but.... by Nehmo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mosquitoes are God's creatures. Don't fuck with them.

      The bacterium Wolbachia pipientis is also a creation of our Lord. We are only being a servant of God.

      --
      (||) Nehmo (||)
    3. Re: Mosquitos are anoying, but.... by aberglas · · Score: 1

      The piece of code I just wrote is a creation of the Lord. Including the bugs which are all part of His plan.

    4. Re:Mosquitos are anoying, but.... by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      We're not eliminating the entire biomass that fills that niche - just a particularly nasty, invasive one that spreads disease. Other, native mosquito species will fill the same ecological niche, so the system as a whole will remain intact.

  5. Re:Ecofacist Propaganda Agency with another great by Custard+Horse · · Score: 4, Funny

    For their next trick, free Ebola sandwiches!

    Is that like Free Mandela tee-shirts?

  6. Re:And how on Earth.... by Kiuas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or should we, the rest of the World, to just sit and close our mouth with whatever thing they like to do that might fuck our countries? Same as the Paris Climate?

    Wait what? Did you just equate genetically modified species being released into the wild with a non-binding international treaty to curb emissions? Wtf?

    For the Nth time, the Paris climate agreement is non-binding. If for whatever reason your country does not care about the global climate, you're entirely free to ignore the Paris goals, shut your eyes and keep burning all the oil and the coal you want. There are no sanctions in the treaty for countries that do not meet their goals.

    The point of the Paris agreement is to try to get everyone to do what they can to slow down the rate of emissions (and hence warming) to a point where the consequences are more manageable. The point is precisely to try to make sure nations don't get fucked by massive climatic changes.

    Comparing such a project, which has a well understood basis in natural science (the greenhouse effect has been well understood for over a century and is demonstrable in a lab) and is based on the voluntary co-operation of nations for the common good of everyone (just like the closing of the hole in the ozone layer, which was also achieved by an international consensus and realization that continuation of past practices would have lead to serious harm for everyone) to an experiment where a single nation starts to release genetically modified insects is just plain dumb. We know that reducing emissions is good for everyone in the mid to long term, and we know this for a fact. We don't know that releasing genetically modified mosquitoes into the wild will not have significant adverse effects.

    I understand that this kind of strawman where the Paris treaty is seen as some kind of NWO tool to control what nations can do flies on facebook & al where people get their news from mainly reading headlines of blogposts, but I seriously expect people on this site to have a modicum more of insight into what the treaty actually says before going overboard with the tinfoilhat level of crazy.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  7. Too late for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Zika-carrying mosquito is an invasive species in the US, and one that got there because of Human globalization and transport systems. Wiping out that subspecies is to restore balance not disrupt it.

    1. Re:Too late for that by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      That's probably what Indians say about whitey.

  8. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not only are the targeted mosqutoes an invasive species, but your ability to read TFS is as offensively poor as your abuse of apostrophes.

  9. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by thereitis · · Score: 2

    By approving to only 20 states, do they really think the mosquitoes will not cross state lines? Or jump to Mexico or Canada? What if a country like N.Korea starts designing and releasing their own organisms in a "F the world" gesture - then will it be seen as a problem?

  10. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by thereitis · · Score: 1

    Sounds good on paper. Let's watch and see.

  11. Re: Ecofacist ... --.-- by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "And for the record: I agree that this plan is utterly insane."

    I disagree. If that was the case, the article obviously would have the whatcouldpossiblygowrong flag.

  12. Finally! by dHagger · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Wolbachia bacteria already exists naturally in insects all over the world, including several species of mosquitoes. The bacteria inhibits reproduction of viruses like Zika, Dengue and Chikungunya in the mosquito, significantly reducing the risk of spreading the virus. This without using any kind of chemicals or genetic engineering. The World Mosquito Program has more information about Wolbachia: http://www.eliminatedengue.com...

  13. These comments are terrible by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The bacteria they're using already exists in nature and already infects mosquitoes. Nothing is being released that isn't already out there. All this conjecture about genetically modified organisms, hybrids, extinction, jumping species, etc. is just knee-jerk fear-mongering by people who have no clue what they're talking about.

    1. Re:These comments are terrible by burtosis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, so you agree this can and will start a zombie apocalypse, that's all I needed to hear. Time to top off those ammo bins.

    2. Re:These comments are terrible by gtall · · Score: 1

      Zombie mosquitoes? Now there is a horror flick.

    3. Re:These comments are terrible by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      The racist comments are terrible too... That and what you said are the reason no one with actual technical knowledge of a subject posts in Slashdot forums anymore.

    4. Re:These comments are terrible by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      So because something exists in nature, humans are incapable of using that thing to disrupt delicate ecosystem balances or create unnatural combinations of that thing with other things that could, in turn, take a path that was unforeseen by the god-like humans who have a perfect record of predicting the outcomes of their machinations in every chaotic system imaginable?

    5. Re:These comments are terrible by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1
      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:These comments are terrible by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      "Zoombies" and "Zombeavers" are actual movies about zombie animals in a zoo and beavers, respectively... Zomsquitoes doesn't sound too far out there in comparison.

    7. Re:These comments are terrible by ZZZaphod · · Score: 1

      That statement is incorrect. If, and I'm paraphrasing to make the point, 'we are introducing nothing different', then in fact, we could not expect any change. But, in fact, we are releasing something that is not already out there, and hoping that we like the changes it makes. If I may give words to the thing that you see stuck in our brother's craw, it is: We know that complex systems are complex. We know that we have been, and continue to be surprised by the interactions of complex systems and even moreso by the reactions of complex systems to our intervention. This is true even when we make a careful study of them beforehand. To describe a bit further, the vitriol you hear grows from long lived frustration. From living with the consequences of a lineage of men in white coats who think it their right to make choices that may hurt or harm hundreds, thousands or millions of their brothers. This vitriol is exasperated by a history of excuses and weak apologies as to how the suffering is noble, for it was for the cause of progress that he and his kin did suffer. In the nation I was born, we have a quaint notion that men are created equal, and that my right to life and prosperity and may never infringe upon my fellow countrymen. There, every man has a right to conduct grand, sweeping experiments - on himself, and his family, and his land. And then when he has proven the efficacy and safety of his progress, can his countryman, choose to follow suit. Although it ought not be, a mans confidence is independent of his understanding.

  14. Re:Ecofacist Propaganda Agency with another great by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Free Palestine *

    * Offer only valid with the purchase of one Palestine at full price.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  15. Have we learned nothing... by Ragnarok89 · · Score: 1

    from Jurassic Park?

    Life... will find a way.

  16. but... by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Do mosquito females only mate with one male?
    I ask because if mosquitoes are like cats or humans who mate with many males, they would end up with offspring even if most of the males are shooting blanks.

  17. One thing is for certain by cstacy · · Score: 4, Funny

    When these males mate with wild females, which do not carry the same strain of Wolbachia, the resulting fertilized eggs don't hatch because the paternal chromosomes do not form properly.

    Except for the ones that do form. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping mutant DNA; the mosquitos will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new insect overlords. I’d like to remind them that as a trusted Slashdot moderator, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground anti-DEET research labs.

  18. Reading Comprehension Fail by coinreturn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are no genetically-modified mosquitoes here. They are infected with a naturally-occurring bacterium. Please reduce the size of your tinfoil wardrobe.

    1. Re:Reading Comprehension Fail by Thirty4 · · Score: 2

      In Brazil they are using genetically-modified mosquitoes. FTA - "Using lab-grown mosquitoes to kill mosquito pests has been tested extensively in Brazil in recent years. The country has allowed large-scale releases of such mosquitoes in response to an epidemic of the Zika virus that began in 2015. Zika is a mosquito-borne virus that has been linked to severe birth defects, such as abnormally small heads — a condition known as microcephaly. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are thought to be the primary vector for the virus. One type of mosquito being tested in Brazil is a genetically modified variety of A. aegypti developed by Oxitec in Milton, UK. When the modified male mosquitoes mate with wild females, they pass a lethal gene on to any progeny."

  19. Re:And how on Earth.... by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    Binding or not, it is wrong of us to not participate.

  20. Genetics 101 Question by CodeHog · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't this strengthen the population that carries the viruses by eliminating the weaker carries, i.e. breeding out the weak and re-enforcing the stronger ones? I'm not a biologist or geneticist

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    1. Re:Genetics 101 Question by bahwi · · Score: 1

      Yes, but resistances are best seen as cycles. Many crop plants go through 10-20 year cycles due to various diseases. As plants are distributed immune to a certain disease another eventually comes along, and then disease resistance for that is prioritized. Maintaining an immunity has costs associated with it, so they don't last a long time.

      Also, disease resistant ones may not be "stronger" except in this aspect, it could be linked to a weaker trait, or multiple traits, good, bad, and mostly neutral, but that is determined based on other factors and environment.

    2. Re:Genetics 101 Question by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this strengthen the population that carries the viruses by eliminating the weaker carries, i.e. breeding out the weak and re-enforcing the stronger ones? I'm not a biologist or geneticist

      Only if they survive. For millions of already extinct species this didn't happen, so don't bet the house on 'life always finds a way' bullshit.

  21. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This shit is literally like 50 years old. The science is settled. Even the alarmist EPA couldn't find anything wrong with it.

  22. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Informative

    By approving to only 20 states, do they really think the mosquitoes will not cross state lines? Or jump to Mexico or Canada? What if a country like N.Korea starts designing and releasing their own organisms in a "F the world" gesture - then will it be seen as a problem?

    I don't know that the concept is to have strict geographic borders. Any borders will be very fuzzy. But the highly focused control methods are not new. Bacillus thuringiensis I is also used to control Mosquitoes. And it does a great job, killing the larvae of just the mosquitoes (also fungus gnat and blackfly larvae) but that's it. In the pond in my backyard, we use it, and doesn't bother the frogs or fish one bit.

    Bacillus thuringiensis K a version of the bacteria that goes after Gypsy moths. And it's approved for "organic" status.

    Both completely natural, not man made and found on beaches.

    And did you know that there are some species of insect that cannot reproduce without Wolbachia, the bacteria in question? It is a very common bacteria, it has the same effect in a male mosquito who picks it up randomly as in a purposely infected one.

    We've learned a lot about pest control, and have gone far beyond early and clumsy efforts. While so many Slashdotters are still stuck in the 1960's Andromeda Strain world, we've been using these highly focused controls for many years. might as well rail on about vaccines.

    tl;dr version. if Wolbachia is a problem, we're screwed already because it's ubiquitous. As for NK pulling some insect borne stunt, its them and everyone else. This isn't rocket surgery.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  23. Re:And how on Earth.... by be951 · · Score: 4, Informative

    how on Earth is going the EPA and US to control that such kind of hybrids

    Well, first of all, these are not "hybrids". They are just regular mosquitoes carrying a bacteria that regularly infects mosquitoes already. So, done?

    doesn't invade another countries like Canada or Mexico?

    What the bacteria does is make the male mosquito sterile, so that when he mates with a female in the wild, instead of producing thousands of new mosquitoes they just make thousands of eggs that don't develop. I'm pretty sure we don't have to worry about the eggs migrating to other countries. And since male mosquitoes (the only ones being infected and released) only live about ten days, the risk of them travelling across borders seems fairly small. And if they do, their tenancy as illegal aliens of other countries will be quite short-lived. And, since the treatment they receive sterilizes them, they will have no foreign-born offspring disrupting the existing mosquito populations of other countries, taking their jobs, getting on mosquito welfare, or whatever.

  24. the uneducated masses stir in fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My favorite comments thus far have been ones from people with clearly no understanding of biology or pathology. Would you wet your pants in your chair if I told you this isn't the first time a strategy like this has been employed? Not specifically with the mosquito, or any particular species thereof, but with many invasive species of plants, such as cheatgrass:

    https://blog.nature.org/science/2016/09/07/attacking-invasive-cheatgrass-root-soil-microbes-biocontrol-sage/

    and fish:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333861/

    This is not under-explored science, nor is it novel. Read a book (or a publication) once in a while instead of buzzfeed and you'd be surprised to learn what we actually know how to do with regard to ecosystem modification.

  25. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by Ogive17 · · Score: 3

    Well - 1st off this species originated in tropical and sub-tropical Asia.. so the more arid western states probably do not have a mosquito problem to begin with. 2nd, southern states that do not experience prolonged sub-freezing temperatures probably have a much larger rate of infection. That right there condenses the areas that could use this "treatment".

    They are only releasing the mosquitoes with the naturally occurring bacteria, they aren't really genetically modified. Think of it more as selective breeding aimed at controlling this aggressive mosquito.

    I just got back from Japan - it wasn't nearly as bad this time but this breed is nasty. My son and I are pin cushions to them.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  26. Re:And how on Earth.... by franzrogar · · Score: 1

    Quote: "And, since the treatment they receive sterilizes them, ..."

    Are you sure? I mean, are you SCIENTIFICALLY sure about that point?

    Let's see some scenearios I'm sure they have taken into account (pun intended):

    1) Mosquitoes infected that ain't sterile after all.
    2) Interspecies newborns that might became bacteria-proof (think like horse + donkey = mule). This mosquito+bacteria + another species of mosquito from other Country might create another thing that hasn't been studies and might even create much much worse scenario
    3) Etc.

    That's why in Europe is not allowed to sell GMOs and in EEUU it is, because there's no study of side-effects. (Like when an USA University proposed, seriously, to launch an umbrella into space to reduce global warming... Â_Â )

  27. Naturally occurring by slick7 · · Score: 1

    The basic ingredients of aspartame are naturally occurring. That doesn't mean we should engorge ourselves with it. With the ubiquity of Bisphenol A in the human food chain, sterile "males" will decimate the human race. Thereby giving these insects free reign over this planet. That's how G-d rolls.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  28. Re: A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wr by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it's true that Northern states still have mosquitoes. I've even had someone jokingly tell me that the mosquito is even the state bird of Minnesota.

    However, not all mosquito species actually carry the diseases that we'd like to prevent, and some of those species that are carriers don't inhabit northern states or aren't as prevalent on the west coast of the country.

  29. Re:And how on Earth.... by be951 · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? I mean, are you SCIENTIFICALLY sure about that point?

    From TFA: "Using lab-grown mosquitoes to kill mosquito pests has been tested extensively in Brazil in recent years. [emphasis mine]" A number of other tests -- for specifically this method, and similar ones -- are mentioned as well, so I'm going to go with "Yes" in answer to your question.

    I'm not sure why you think this is being approved for widespread use (somewhat anyway. But still limited to areas with temperature and precipitation conditions to areas where it was successfully tested within the U.S.) without adequate testing. It is not as if it is going from concept directly to broad approval.

  30. Dear Lord, please . . . by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    . . . tell me this has absolutely nothing to do with Oxitec or the Gates Foundation, for when Gates Foundation owned Oxitec, and they released those dengue-fighting mosquitoes, every single location experienced an explosion in that Zika virus!

  31. Re:Don't mess with nature by bahwi · · Score: 1

    And the dodo, T-rex, Brontosauri that roam freely....

    oh wait.

  32. There's an easier way by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    If you want to cut down on the number of blood-sucking parasites in your area, the answer is simple: quit electing them.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  33. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by Gussington · · Score: 1

    We've learned a lot about pest control, and have gone far beyond early and clumsy efforts. While so many Slashdotters are still stuck in the 1960's Andromeda Strain world, we've been using these highly focused controls for many years. might as well rail on about vaccines.

    Oh man, I thoroughly enjoyed that post. Good work!

  34. Re:And how on Earth.... by Gussington · · Score: 1

    Quote: "And, since the treatment they receive sterilizes them, ..."

    Are you sure? I mean, are you SCIENTIFICALLY sure about that point?

    I'm not sure, but what I am confident of is that the scientists who do this work for a living know more about it than you or I. And even if they go off half-cocked there are layers and layers of scrutiny and regulations to pull them up.
    So yeah, the place to ask these questions is not here.

  35. Re: A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wr by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

    I agree with this. I've lived in central Africa, the upper Midwest US, and a Nordic country.

    The mosquitoes in central Africa (city and rural areas) were definitely less bothersome than summer in rural areas in the other two places. On the other hand, occasionally you come down with malaria.

    --
    "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  36. the 20 states are by baubo · · Score: 1

    The 20 states are CA, CT, DC, DE, lL, IN, KY, MA, ME, MD, MO, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OH, PA. RI, TN, VT, and WY. (from the document at https://www.regulations.gov/do...)

  37. Re:A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wro by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

    Oh no, not an invasive mosquito species going extinct. Whatever will we do?

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  38. Re: A killer gene drive? What could possibly go wr by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

    Yep, cold states have intense mosquito seasons, but not with the species they're targeting in this article.

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.