Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Can You Convert Old iPods Into A Home Music-Streaming Solution?

Slashdot reader zhennian wants to stream music throughout his entire house, "and was hoping that with three old iPods I might be able to put together a centrally managed house-wide audio system." Ideally it would be possible to control what's playing from a central web interface using an app on an IOS or Android device. With the iPods already plugged into docking stations and on the home wifi network, I assume it should be possible.

A search of the Apple app store didn't bring up much and forking out $AUS400 for a Sonos One or equivalent seems wasted when I've already purchased iPod docks. Can anyone recommend an App that will still be compatible with old (ie. 2007) iPods and might do this?

Or is there a better cheap alternative? Leave your best answers in the comments. Can you convert old iPods into a home music-streaming solution?

74 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Or is there a better cheap alternative? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get refurbished Echo dots for under 35 bucks.

    Additionally to playing music in all the rooms, voice-operated, it will open the door, make calls, control the lighting and read books to you or good night stories to the kids and help them with their maths.

    1. Re: Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Privacy is so 2010

    2. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now to open doors, make calls and adjust lighting. How much extra stuff on top of that $35 do you need?

      For the most part Echo alone is as useful as you voice assist on your smartphone. And for smartphones you can get stuff to open doors, control lighting. However I never checks the specs to see if a smartphone can make calls. They never advertise that feature.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      How's the audio quality? Can you line-out to bigger / better speakers?

    4. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      It has a 3.5" line-out port or can use Bluetooth. For music playback, you'd obviously need external speakers to get decent audio quality, especially for Echo Dots.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "How's the audio quality? Can you line-out to bigger / better speakers?"

      Evidently! Just like his 2007 iPods.

    6. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Entrope · · Score: 2

      Does Amazon carry adapter cables to convert from those 3.5" jacks to the 1/8â jacks that most of my equipment has?

    7. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by methano · · Score: 1

      The original question is just flat out stupid. These days, devices to generate the sound waves needed are ubiquitous. So those old iPods are useless and have no vauue. Why use an iPod when you have a million better sources for sound. And you're not saving any money. The speakers are where all the costs live.

      "I've got a couple of old lug nuts lying around the house. Anybody know how I can use them to make a Formula I race car?"

    8. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Wow. What the hell was I smoking when I typed in those dimensions?

      I'm trying to imagine what a 3 1/2" plug would actually look like now.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      Presumably you were thinking 3.5mm, the standard size for small electronics that have an analog audio jack, and somehow the units got swapped :)

    10. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm in good company. At least I didn't crash a spaceship, right?

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    11. Re: Or is there a better cheap alternative? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of Amazon?

    12. Re:Or is there a better cheap alternative? by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      Man, if you've never cobbled together a solution from disparate devices that were in no way the best option for something, you really get out too much.

  2. Squeezebox solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Assuming the ipods are iOS based then you could use an app like iPENG classic to make the ipod into a squeezebox player
    Then you just need a computer or raspberry pi equivalent to run the server software on and you should be set to go

    1. Re:Squeezebox solution by SilverNerfer · · Score: 1

      Third This !! :)

    2. Re:Squeezebox solution by Etcetera · · Score: 2

      Assuming the ipods are iOS based then you could use an app like iPENG classic to make the ipod into a squeezebox player
      Then you just need a computer or raspberry pi equivalent to run the server software on and you should be set to go

      This is probably the best way to go.

      A big question is whether you have multiple speakers you want to broadcast to at once. Also, I'm assuming you mean "iPod Touch" here and not the classic iPods. Classics cannot broadcast on their own except to whatever they're physically docked into (although that itself can do what it wants with it). However, neither has the ability to AirPlay to multiple devices simultaneously (which is what you want for a whole-house solution). Personally, I have a Windows box running iTunes constantly that serves as the main media repository. From there, any iOS device on your network can run the "Remote" App, which allows you to select and control music, as well as control multi-speaker output and volume. "Retune" I think is the app I was using on the Android side, although it's been a while.

      It can be hard to find AirPlay speakers out there nowadays. I was fortunate enough to pick up 7 or 8 XtremeMac Tango Air speakers a while back for about $60/ea and they're great for this. Find something similar, or an AppleTV to interface with a full HDMI to your stereo system, and you should be all set.

    3. Re:Squeezebox solution by SilverNerfer · · Score: 1

      See this for a squeezeboxserver that runs on a Raspberry Pi http://picoreplayer.sourceforg...

    4. Re: Squeezebox solution by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      IIRC the iPod Touch didn't come out until after 2007. Sounds like he is trying to do this with the "classic"-style iPods that were even more walled off than the ones running iOS. Probably would be *easier* to junk everything and buy into whatever system Apple is offering this year. It would be *cheaper* to ditch Apple entirely and build a system based on Raspberry Pis or something else without a logo tax and planned obsolescence.

    5. Re:Squeezebox solution by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      It can be hard to find AirPlay speakers out there nowadays.

      This is the problem with almost all tech, a few years and your rebuilding the whole system as it no longer works because one part has lost support even though it is still totally functional on its own and the work/time involved to keep it going exceeds its value. I've noticed the time to to make something redundant is far less than it used to be.

      The real question is how long will this solution last when implemented

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    6. Re:Squeezebox solution by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      It can be hard to find AirPlay speakers out there nowadays.

      There are plenty of dirt cheap AirPort Expresses out there on eBay with AirPlay support built in. Just plug in your favorite speakers!

    7. Re:Squeezebox solution by zhennian · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this helpful suggestion, I should have specified that the iPod Touches in question are Gen2 MC and MB models and Apple ceased ISO support at 4.2.1, so I was frustratingly close to an iPeng / Squeezebox solution.

    8. Re:Squeezebox solution by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...or use your Pi to be the server, and use the ipod as external storage with your MP3s on it. Use whatever you like as the client side.

      I've got an ipod shuffle (old style, the one with the 'stand' for charging it) - the battery's shot, so I don't suppose it'll do much useful any more, but I did wonder if I could use the clicky buttons for something. I'm not even sure how to open the case though...

  3. Plex/Chromecast Audio by Flubb · · Score: 1

    I did mine with some T-class amps, (about 25 each), Chromecast audio (15 each), some leftover speakers I had lying about, Google Home, and Plex. That way I had decent audio quality (insofar as the speakers were hifi quality). You can tack on extra bluetooth speakers (if they allow 3.5mm inputs) if you don't have speaker pairs, and add more rooms that way. Echo dots are not that great for music.

    1. Re:Plex/Chromecast Audio by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I have musicpd on my NAS and I also export my music directory as read-only NFS share. I can then plug in any cheap machine with acceptable sound (or a RPi for rooms where sound quality isn't that big a deal) also running musicpd. There are multiple apps (desktop, web, and mobile) for controlling musicpd and I can configure each one to output as a stream as well as to the local speakers, so that the others can either listen to their own queue or be slaved to another. Musicpd is packaged for just about any OS that you might be running. Adding an NFS import to most *NIX systems is a simple matter of a line in fstab.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Plex/Chromecast Audio by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I second the Plex/Chromecast Audio solution. Normally the Chromecast would only play streaming music services, but with Plex I can play all the music I already have on the computer. I have five of the Chromecast Audios spread around the house since it will sync the music between all of them.

      That's how I do it. 3 CCAs in the house & outdoor speakers, 1 other I use portable, PLEX as the server and control. Haven't seen a lower cost, easier to implement solution. Group Sync works great.

      The only missing item for me was on/off remote control. I started using some RF controlled power switches, then recently went with some JinVoo compatible smart plugs so I can turn on/off from Android as well.

  4. I'm sure you can by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like you can convert and old car into a bicycle I'm sure you can turn iPods into a Frankenstein's monster example of what technology was not supposed to do. The result will nearly always be inelegant, frustrating and I'll bet you a Mars bar you'll throw it away soon after you finish and buy an of the shelf solution anyway.

    Speaking of buying these DIY solutions often end up costing fat more than you estimate as you find repeated shortcomings in what you create.

    Take it from me, don't proceed unless you're a hobby tinkerer or a bored engineer who enjoys the busy work.

  5. Cheap alternative-- YES by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    This is very easy to do if you have some savvy. The software has been around for a very long time. The hardware is cheap.

    Hardware:
    TPLink OpenWRT compatible wifi router with USB port.
    USB Hub
    USB hard disk
    USB sound hardware.
    [already existing home stereo(s)]
    Stereo patch cables

    Software:
    OpenWRT with suitable sound modules, the MPD (Media Player Daemon), netjukebox, and apache web server (with php) packages.

    Really, ANY minimalist linux box with USB ports and a network stack would work, but these wifi routers are cheap. Super cheap.

    You only need one of these (if you install more than one) to have storage attached, if you enable NFS shares, and configure the others to connect. If you have a NAS, you can just use that most likely.

  6. What site do you think this is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love these sorts of questions. Dear Slashdot, I have 8 Linksys routers from 2006 in my closet, I would like to know how to wire them together to create a smart garage door opener. I know cheap turnkey solutions exist, but that would involve googling them. I'll be patiently awaiting your answer. Love, A Faithful Reader

    1. Re:What site do you think this is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then someone would point out that you can probably find enough code examples for a raspberry pi. And then offer a link to dd-wrt.com for a starting point for running the code on a 2006 era linksys router.

    2. Re:What site do you think this is? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about [garage door openers], but I've read you can make a crypto-mining network out of [linksys routers from 2006 in my closet]. The [8] of them should be able to mine about half a Dogecoin per hour.

      Good luck.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:What site do you think this is? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Oooh oooh oooh. First I assume you have a set of WRT54Gs. The timing would suit quite well. You'll need to install DD-WRT on it. You may need a JTAG cable to do this depending on the model. To access the GPIO pins you'll need to solder cables near the RP3 header. They will most likely require some level shifting as it's 3V I/O but if you look up any normal interface to a garage door opener which includes an open collector output then you should be good to go. I'm less certain about the software side. I guess some python could probably do that. You can interface this with the existing web server.

      Finally don't forget an app, every cool project has an app.

    4. Re: What site do you think this is? by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then you realize an ESP8266 can do all that in a footprint about 1/100th of the router at a price which is about the difference in energy costs to run the router another year.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:What site do you think this is? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps you should first make a Beowolf cluster with them?
      Then you could open/close all doors/windows in your neighbourhood!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:What site do you think this is? by argee · · Score: 1

      You could put them in a bag, tie them to the chain, but you would need to buy some pulleys to get the right
      amount of pull. Then, you take the routers, tie them to the hook and, voila, the door opens. Simple. To
      close the door, remove the bag. You might need an 800 ft tower for the upper pulley.

    7. Re:What site do you think this is? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Dear Slashdot, I have 8 Linksys routers from 2006 in my closet, I would like to know how to wire them together to create a smart garage door opener.

      P.S. Having it also mine bitcoin in the background would be a plus!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re: What site do you think this is? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Then you realize an ESP8266 can do all that

      You bought something else. You completely missed the point of this entirely facetious yet still somewhat accurate solution to the problem.

      And yes I do, I have 3 of them on my home network already.

    9. Re:What site do you think this is? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ask MacGyver. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    10. Re: What site do you think this is? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Your post is nonsense.

  7. Airfoil is close. by darkith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Airfoil will stream content from an iOS device to a computer, and then to multiple target devices (many brands), including iOS 7+ devices running their satellite app. Has balancing and zones, etc.

    My brother has it setup this way, using a mishmash of old iPods, Airport expresses, AirPlay compatible speakers and and Apple TV.

  8. What site do YOU think this is?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is Sparta^WSlashdot, kid.

    Where people understand what ^W means, HTML is considered trivial knowledge,

    and we do crazy things with computers and technology because we can.

    This was once considered a pillar of geek culture.

    Bro, do you even 5-digit UID?

    1. Re:What site do YOU think this is?? by wik · · Score: 1

      Bro, do you even 5-digit UID?

      Bok bok bok! Just barely!

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    2. Re:What site do YOU think this is?? by Saint · · Score: 1

      "Bro, do you even 5-digit UID?"

      Why yes....yes I do.

    3. Re:What site do YOU think this is?? by Kazin · · Score: 2

      5?

    4. Re:What site do YOU think this is?? by Saint · · Score: 1

      Very nice! I bow to your nerdiness.

  9. What has happened to this site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Back in 2002, we ate these projects for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

    Doing crazy things "because we can" was considered a pillar of geek and hacking culture.

    And this here was far from the the craziest stuff.
    I mean an iPod is a computer with audio playback and wireless networking.
    Putting Linux on it and making it into pretty much anything we want, and then some(!), including people posting kernel patches to do it, was and should be considered normal for us owners of a geek card.

    But hey, we also still knew the Jargon Files and what actual hacking, not cracking, was all about.

    Yes, yes, I should be saying something about lawns now...

    1. Re:What has happened to this site? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could rig up a Raspberry Pi to network each iPod, then make one of them the "master" with a database and web interface, control it with the well documented serial protocol, run line out to an amplifier and external speakers...

      But why the fuck would you?!

      We have half a dozen or so iPods lying around the house... they used to get heavy use. And one is actually used in a useful way for home audio: it is hooked up to a Sonos dock, and along with 5 speakers of various models, we have whole-house audio (small home...). Oh, and we almost never use the iPod for music-- it is mainly TuneIn on various commercial-free stations. Does come in handy when the internet is down though.

    2. Re:What has happened to this site? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      The economy recovered, that's what. In 2002, the economy... especially tech... wasn't just receding or declining, it was collapsing. When companies were closing down left and right, half the world was laid off, and even if you were employed you were never confident that your company wouldn't go under next week then sure; half-assed solutions hacked together with whatever scrap you could find lying around made a certain amount of sense. Back then, I had a closet of castoff junk that resembled the droid bay of a sandcrawler too; and built my fair share of bad ideas myself.

      Now? For the value of the time I would spend MacGyvering a home-audio rig out of cast-off iPods (Old ones at that, with spinny HDs that are almost certainly near or past EOL by now.), duct tape, and paperclips; I could easily buy something incomparably better and spend my sparse leisure time hiking Mt Tam, camping or snowboarding up by Yosemite or Tahoe, catching up on the backlog of games I haven't had time for, or going out dancing and drinking. And if I was full-out determined to do more "tech stuff" outside my job, I could just pick up some 1099 hours.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    3. Re:What has happened to this site? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It depends what you want to achieve.

      If you want to tinker, then sure - tinker away.

      If you want a centrally managed housewide audio system, get one.

      If you want to combine the two, get a devkit and write your own apps.

      But OP seems to want an off the shelf tinkering solution.

  10. there are speakers by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    look it up. my brother was ooing and aaahing about these wi-fi speakers

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  11. Do you like to tinker? by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Then go ahead and try to fiddle something with those old iPods.

    As far as I can tell, a Rasberry Pi and MPD (music player daemon) does the trick faster, easyer and cheaper.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Do you like to tinker? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Using an existing iPod touch, you already have a decent DAC. You would need to go the USB DAC route with the pi if you care even a little about audio quality.

  12. for me it was Sonos Connect by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    when I built my house in 2002, I put in the speaker wire runs for wall speakers before the drywall went up. Once we closed on the house I used a fox and hound to find the ends inside the wall by connecting the tone generator to the junction box where all the wires converged. I then installed in-wall speakers that I got for a deal on ebay in white so I could dry brush the wall color paint on them to remove that plastic look. I have a simple zone selector switch that bridges the audio to all the channels and lets me determine which ones are on or off (currently its all manual selection as the electronic remote ones are still more than I really want to spend, especially since I rarely, if ever, alter the selections). Several years ago (5?) I acquired a Sonos:Connect and am feeding that into my receiver which I like a lot better than the previous ipod+playlist method. I find the iphone app of Sonos a lot more feature rich than the PC app. This works well for playing the same music in every room like when hosting dinner parties etc. For an individual room solution, there are tons of streaming apps you can use to play on devices like appletv, roku, firetv, etc and utilize your surround sound speakers for music.

  13. "Three old iPods" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    What do you mean? African click wheel iPod or European iOS iPod touch?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:"Three old iPods" by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Eh, I don't know that

  14. Streamripper + Streamtuner by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Here's some 10-year old software for your 10-year old hardware:

    http://www.nongnu.org/streamtu...
    http://streamripper.sourceforg...

    So on my main server I would set up a streaming proxy, that would also save whatever content from internet radio streams I was listening to, and I'd point all of the other clients in the house to it so they'd all be playing the same thing as I walked from room to room. Usually there wasn't any noticeable lag between them, but different internet radio clients do buffer more than others... just not the ones I was using.

    As for controlling the primary playlist, back then I just used ssh + screen back to the server since I was using the console streamtuner client, but nowadays you could probably set up VLC or Clementine to be the head node feeding your proxy channel, and both of those projects have good remote control apps.

  15. Rasberry Pi, IQaudio, squeezeboxserver by udin · · Score: 1
    I use Rasberry Pis running Logitech Media Server (free as in gratis, don't know if libre), and squeezelite (libre) player software. The d/a and amps for the Pis come from IQaudio. There is at least one other supplier of comparable-spec Pi audio hardware, but I haven't tried them. Use the d/a for line out to existing audio systems; use the d/a-amp combo to drive fairly substantial speakers. I use the various computers and smartphones around the house to control it. They can also run the squeezelite player software. Synchronizing works well with squeezelite software players on the pis and linux machines. It doesn't work well with Java-based players.

    I found this approach when I was looking to back up my slimserver hardware after slimserver was bought by Logitech and then dropped, although they continue to maintain the server software now called Logitech Media Server.

    CDs are stored in lossless format (flac) on the server (which could also host a player, but I don't.)

    You could use your iPods as controllers and players (see the app store). What I don't know is how well synchronizing works for iPod players--haven't tried it.

    --
    udin
  16. Re:Privacy is dead for the proletariat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Zuckerberg bought an Island for privacy, with the money he made when you willingly gave him your privacy.

    There, fixed it for ya!

  17. Squeezebox by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Logitech Squeezebox is still around. Install squeeze server on any PC in your home, and squeeze player on the iPods, attach to radios whether it be through the aux in or an old one with a dock, done. Remote control with Orange Squeeze on your phone, or though the Squeezebox console.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  18. I must not be a geek by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 1

    It kind of looks like a regular expression. Did Slashdot mangle it?

    --
    I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.
  19. Re:Privacy is dead for the proletariat by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

    Facebook has a shadow profile on people who have never agreed to allow them to collect information on them.

    Many people willingly whore out their details, but facebook will make money off you whether you want them to or not.

  20. Re: Simpler option by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I have an FM transmitter with the range of a good mile. Purchased legally from Amazon, so Iâ(TM)m sure they have the FCC clearances.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  21. Re:Privacy is dead for the proletariat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Facebook has a shadow profile on people who have never agreed to allow them to collect information on them.

    Which should be illegal. If you haven't given them consent, they should not have any legal grounds to keep, let alone publicly display, that data. They should have full liability for any identity theft or fraud that may occur with that individual, and they should be able to be sued in court for damages. If they choose to publicly disclose it regardless.

    Why? We have non-disclosure and need-to-know laws for a reason. Their "right to profit" (NOT an actual right, mind you.) does not outweigh the individual's need to protect their identity, credit, and safety. Especially when they lack any form of specific agreement with said individual. (Not debating the whole: "You can sign away your legal rights" crap that the so called "land of the free" allows. That's a topic for another day.)

    They are publicly admitting that the individual doesn't have an account with them, therefore any data they have should be:

          A. Immediately regarded as unverified and unactionable information. (We wouldn't want to be accused of libel too many times now would we?)

          B. Removed from public view. (Including registered users.)

          C. Discarded immediately. (They did not have permission to retain that data from it's owner. Acting on it would be a violation. Just as it would be a violation for a person in a privileged position, (say a school administrator), to act on information disclosed to them about someone else, (in that case a student), for personal gain.)

    Personally, I don't think the laws should need to be re-written every single time a new technology comes along. Preferably we need to enforce the existing laws, but we do need to limit this behavior, and if it requires a law change to get it done, then so be it. People have a need to protect themselves from rumors and misinformation that is spread about them. Facebook and any other such platform should not be exempt from that solely because someone else gave them that data.

  22. Go with the browser by omnichad · · Score: 1

    HTTP streaming is a solved problem and iOS was made to run native-like apps. Run mpd remotely on your server and create a basic web interface that streams the audio.

    The problem with old iPods is that older versions of software are made unavailable when a newer version comes out. Even if that newer version is incompatible with old hardware. If you didn't download Plex in time for example, it's probably no longer an option.

  23. Re:Privacy is dead for the proletariat by boudie2 · · Score: 2

    Zuckerberg bought an Island for privacy, with the money he made when you unwittingly gave him your privacy.

    There, fixed it for ya!

    You spelled unwittingly wrong.

  24. Squeezeboxes by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 1

    Pick up some used Squeezebox devices on eBay. Their music server is open source, runs on Mac OS, and is compatible with iTunes. The devices sync beautifully. More info.

  25. A different idea by grim_thing · · Score: 1

    You can pick up an 1watt fm transmitter for $30-40(US) and hook it up to the sound card of your music server.

    Put cheap fm radios in every room of the house. You can control the music from your phone and the whole setup can be done for about $100, less if you have old fm radios lying around.

    I did this for years because we moved around quite a bit and it works fine.

    Naturally, the better the radio, the better the sound, but if you want whole house audio, it's the cheapest option.

    1watt is the largest transmitter you can get without an FCC license and it'll stretch out into the yard, which is nice if you BBQ very often.

  26. All these hammers by surfcow · · Score: 1

    You can pound screws with a hammer.
    But most people use a screwdriver.

  27. UE Booms or use them in-car by mveloso · · Score: 1

    The easiest thing to do would be to get a bunch of UE Booms, put them in party up mode, then use the 3.5 jack (or a 3.5 to BT adapter) to play music from the iPod. You'd have to set the Booms up with another device, but I think that should work.

    What I generally do with iPods is put them in cars, because most cars today have the iPod USB protocol implemented. They're great in-car, but finding stuff can be tedious because car UIs don't like scrolling through 128GB of stuff.

  28. Re: rpi3 by jddj · · Score: 1

    Am using mt-daapd (an older cousin to forked-daapd) on a QNAP NAS. Have 2TB of storage (running MythTV on it, too) and can stream my entire library to iOS and Android devices, Roku Soundbridges (old devices - have several) and DAAP clients on desktop OSes.

    Works well, with the exception of iTunes clients, which Apple intentionality breaks for these servers.

  29. Airplay already does that by lusid1 · · Score: 1

    Every room has a tv, every tv has an apple TV, and itunes can send audio out all of them at once. An ATV2 would do the job, and they go for $45. Got a room with no TV? grab an old airport express. Its audio output can be used as an airplay target. Many home theater receivers have airplay support so they can participate in the accidentally apple centric whole house audio architecture.

  30. Re:Squeezebox - Useful Advice by zhennian · · Score: 1

    Thank you for this suggestion, also made by a few others, including use of iPeng Classic. Unfortunately the MC/MB G2 iPod Touches that I have won't even run the oldest available Squeezebox client or iPeng. Even after trying a whited00r flash. I guess Apple do a very good job of making their old (but still functional) hardware obsolete as soon as possible.

  31. Synchronized by lyz · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to do something similar for a long time at home. The closest I came was using gramofon devices with AllPlay. They were driven by a rooted cell phone with an Android app call AirAudio. It works some of the time. It's disappointing that we don't have a better option. I usually try for a while and then give up and just use bluetooth to one output.

  32. Re:Squeezebox - Useful Advice by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    That sucks.. If you can get linux on them, then you might be able to compile squeezelite which is a headless squeezebox slave; admittedly it is a longshot though.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  33. Cheaper Apple option? by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    If you're specifically looking for something that can tap into the Apple ecosystem, I'd personally recommend scavenging over on eBay for a 2nd-gen or 3rd-gen AppleTV.* At a glance, it looks like you could probably get one for under $50. Configure it for your network by attaching it to a screen temporarily, disconnect from that screen (if you prefer a headless implementation) and move it to the location where you want to hear music, and pair it up with any audio output device which has either an optical audio input or an HDMI input. (If you don't have such a device lying around, you can grab a cheap sound bar from someplace like Best Buy or Walmart... a quick search showed me several options on their respective websites for between $35 and $50.)

    Once you have it configured as described, you can use any iOS device to either stream music from any app on your device to the AppleTV, by selecting it as the audio output device for that iOS device, or you can use the Apple TV Remote app on the iOS device to remotely control music directly on the AppleTV. You can also control the AppleTV similarly from a computer (either PC or Mac) which has iTunes installed.

    Speaking of which: alternatively, if you happen to have a computer in the area where you want music -- or a spare computer just lying around that you could put in place -- you could load up iTunes and play music through that computer, controlling it from the iTunes Remote app on your iOS device. It gives you the same basic end result as a headless AppleTV, possibly even with slightly more flexibility, since computers usually have a standard headphone jack; it's just not necessarily the most cost-effective solution unless you already have that computer on hand.

    * Note: I excluded 4th-gen AppleTVs above because they're a bit more expensive, and because they only have HDMI (no optical) for output, so keep that in mind if you decide to splurge on something newer.