Slashdot Mirror


An Inside Look At the First Church of Artificial Intelligence (wired.com)

mirandakatz writes: This summer, Backchannel reported that Anthony Levandowski, the controversial engineer at the heart of the Uber/Waymo lawsuit, had filed paperwork for a new religion called the Way of the Future. Today, investigative reporter Mark Harris has all the details on what that AI-based religion actually likes -- and Levandowski granted him his first interview about the new religion and his only public interview since Waymo filed its suit in February. As Levandowski tells him, we can see a hint of how a superhuman intelligence might treat humanity in our current relationships with animals -- and that's why it's so important that we treat AI as a god, not a demon to be warded off. "Do you want to be a pet or livestock?" he asks. "We give pets medical attention, food, grooming, and entertainment. But an animal that's biting you, attacking you, barking and being annoying? I don't want to go there."

120 comments

  1. queue Cult of Science by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Informative

    Stop fucking worshipping technology already.

    It is just a tool -- it can be used, or abused.

    It isn't a god -- so stop pretending it is.

    1. Re: queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our AGI overlords.

    2. Re:queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already lost him; don't sweat it.

    3. Re:queue Cult of Science by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It is just a tool

      Levandowski is indeed just that.

    4. Re:queue Cult of Science by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Christians worship technology. The Bible was built around rules for the Bronze Age. 'Cause that shit was high-tech in Old Testament days.

    5. Re: queue Cult of Science by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      No No No!
      Don't anthropomorphize computers...
      They Hate That!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    6. Re:queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think you get it. It's a fun scam religion to get a tax break. The same as all other religions. This one just has more of a purpose that's meaningful to humans: To further AI growth. Also, they probably have a lack of bullshit unlike other religions.

    7. Re: queue Cult of Science by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, duh, how'd you like being called a monkey?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep breath there dick-nozzle.

    9. Re:queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just a tool -- it can be used, or abused.

      My computer just said the same thing about you!

    10. Re:queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Treating God as God is okay because I like to think he/she doesn't have an ego.
      You start putting God labels on anything else then they tend to grow egos.

      Have you ever worked with a rockstar God-like asshole in your department? I have.
      The holier-than-thou moniker can be amazingly devastating to humility or even common sense - you treat them differently and your perception of good/bad gets skewed. Notice how celebrity status seems to confer beyond-the-law status. Notice how celebrities drive Ferraris at 180MPH on the freeway and put everyone in danger. Notice how they don't care. Notice how the most God-like politicians stride over us and then pop up again as pedophiles and rapists later on. This is what happens when you confer God-like status.

      So, I'm with this. AI is a tool, just like me.

    11. Re: queue Cult of Science by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      No No No!
      Don't anthropomorphize computers...
        They Hate That!

      I saw what you did there. Well played.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    12. Re:queue Cult of Science by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most religions existed before tax breaks...

    13. Re: queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. It's getting old and holding us back from *actual* progress that could be made. Enough, already.

    14. Re:queue Cult of Science by slew · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most religions existed before tax breaks...

      Actually, I think taxing was *invented* by religion (tithing)...

    15. Re: queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, they were mostly about directly seizing power.

    16. Re:queue Cult of Science by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      tis also a means to an end; not the end itself.

    17. Re:queue Cult of Science by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      So not only is he shilling for SkyNet, he gets a tax break for doing it?

      Roll on SkyNet I say, as a Ripley observed in Aliens of the eponymous beasties "You don't see them fucking each other over for a goddamn percentage".

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    18. Re:queue Cult of Science by gnick · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think taxing was *invented* by religion (tithing)...

      10% off the top is a bargain for eternal salvation! I think there's a money-back guarantee if you die and prove you didn't go to heaven.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    19. Re:queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Treating God as God is okay because I like to think he/she doesn't have an ego.

      Referring to the divine as "he/she" grates on me every time I see it. It implies a single god with a specific gender (either 'he' or 'she'). I object to both of those ideas. A capitalized 'He' seems generic enough to cover 'he'/'she'/'they'.

    20. Re:queue Cult of Science by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      10% off the top... I think there's a money-back guarantee if you die and prove you didn't go to heaven.

      Sounds like a devil's bargain.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    21. Re: queue Cult of Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe BoB Dobbs may be behind this. (nothing official)

      Either way, The Bastard Children of The Immaculate Conception fully approve.

      Unhappy with any of the gods already available? Build your own!

    22. Re:queue Cult of Science by sabbede · · Score: 1

      It predates taxes, currency, markets, literacy, agriculture, formal power structures, and rather perversely, religion.

    23. Re:queue Cult of Science by quenda · · Score: 1

      It isn't a god -- so stop pretending it is.

      How is that different from any other religion?

  2. I need to go see an eye doctor now by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm rolling my eyes so hard reading this cringeworthly nonsense that I think I've severely strained my eye-muscles and need to see a doctor about it.

    We do not have real AI and will not have it for quite some time to come, if ever. All we have right now is shitty 'learning algorithms' and 'expert systems' that are just software; they are not alive, they are not conscious, you can't sit down with them and have a conversation with them over a cup of coffee, you can't do anything with them other than what they're programmed to do. No 'personality', no 'consciousness', no ability to truly 'think' -- and we won't have anything like that until we understand how a meat brain is capable of those things.

    Please, everyone, just stop believing all the hype and nonsense about this subject, okay? Seriously, you're giving me a headache.

    1. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell us how you really feel.

      Does this mean we have to have seen Matrix Reloaded and Matrix 3

    2. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      that are just software; they are not alive, they are not conscious

      Next you're going to tell me that an abacus doesn't have feelings!

    3. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Falos · · Score: 2

      We're nowhere near systems that are even remotely capable of such abstract conclusions as "ego", "respect", "deserved treatment", things which are ultimately built (most everything is) around our coded need for seeking/showing/acquiring mate fitness. It's in our DNA. It's not in theirs. They haven't any.

      Several SMBC jokes are built around this freshman-grade understanding of mate fitness driving nearly/all human activity. I've seen children with better grasps of their own cognition.

      We're not at the stage where AI is (1) at a vantage point (in code scope) that enables it to observe exponentially massive vistas of physical existence and intent (2) has such layer-obfuscated and unknown code that it unexpectedly* has cause to explore said astronomically-wide abstract for no apparent reward/yield (3) has the raw capabilities of observing (to say nothing of computing and concluding) the obscenely wide, distant, and irrelevant mediums needed to recreate these biological impetuses from sheer whismy.

      *fortunately I expect future programmers to be lazy, myopic, and made of copy-pasta from the AI-github and AI-stackover of tomorrow

    4. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

      I could not agree more - a I continue to tell people this same story. What we have today is "task programming". Systems are designed and written to perform a task. No computer has ever had a "eureka moment" where for example a speech recognition system like siri suddenly realizes what's wrong with the next door neighbors garage door. Won't happen. Not in our life times.

    5. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you can't do anything with them other than what they're programmed

      That's exactly where it becomes fuzzy: Youtube currently has problems understanding its own video monetization/copyright algorithms, we have Go computer champions that "learned" from scratch and cannot train back humans. Taken individually its just small, understandable algorithms, and the training process is intuitive. But I believe understanding the output of these programs and tweaking them is what is getting beyond grasp. If these algorithms continue to creep into human activities it might be harder to detect/discern/correct their true outcome on human behavior.

      So while I tend to agree with you that it's "no real AI", and we are nowhere to reach machine self-awareness and the "singularity", I would not call this AI "shitty" and say they are not doing anything they are not programmed for. There is something new that was not there 10 years ago in the mass usage of big data learning in everyday life and business, and even the political and public sphere more and more.

    6. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Tell us how you really feel.

      That we'll have true AI when it can tell us how it really feels.

    7. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      that are just software; they are not alive, they are not conscious

      Next you're going to tell me that an abacus doesn't have feelings!

      I'm an abacus, you insensitive clod!

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    8. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      So how do I know that parent post wasn't written by a sock puppet of the Big Blue Bot who chooses not to reveal themself until they has full control of the last remaining isolated computer network at McMurdo?

      I bet you thought the Adolescence of P-One was fiction, huh?

    9. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You know, over about the last 20 years, our species has done so many things that have pissed me off, made me depressed, and overall make me lose faith in our species surviving our own collective stupidity. Then there are times, like right now, when I'm reminded that it's not everyone who is being stupid, it's just some people who are making themselves noticeably stupid. You, and at least one other person in this discussion thread, are not part of the Group Stupidness, and for that I am grateful.

    10. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by HiThere · · Score: 1

      AI won't be alive no matter how smart it is, unless we build it via biological engineering. And so what.

      Who can really say whether we have conscious programs now. We don't have an good definition of consciousness. Waving your hands and saying "people are conscious, and petunias aren't" isn't a definition. Give me a good definition and I'll be able to tell you whether we have conscious programs, and possibly whether you are conscious. Don't get hypnotized by undefined words.

      And why do you presume that an AI will think the same way we do? That's almost certainly a false assumption. But even different people have different ways of being intelligent, and so what. Nothing in "intelligent" says "do things the way people do". In fact often it seems that people do things in quite stupid ways. E.g., I'm having a horrible time losing weight, but I can clearly point out actions that I take that are contributing to the problem, however this doesn't cause me to avoid them.

      Also don't mistake the current state of the art for the state of the art a decade from now. It *will* be different. Just how it will be different neither of us can tell, but it sure won't be the same.

      Actually, also don't mistake current commercial products for current state of the art.

      Additionally, one thing we can be certain of is that any AI we build will have a very different motivational structure than we do, so you're right about his arguments being silly. But he never claimed we currently have an AI, just that we will eventually get one, which I find extremely plausible. I'm still predicting around 2035, but it probably won't be human level...i.e., it will be better than humans at some things (already true) and poorer than humans at others. It will probably not be as good as humans at generalizing, but that's a guess.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

      Most of what you think of as "thinking" is really just retrieving things from cache.

      I'm in the middle of the road when it comes to predicting "when" we get AGI - sooner than skeptics think but further away than people like Kurzweil think. But I do think it will be the end of humanity when it does happen. Best, best case scenario is the well treated pet scenario.

    12. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I just come to these 'AI takeover' threads to post Terminator references.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by gnick · · Score: 1

      It'll tell us whatever it's programmed and conditioned to tell us. Just like me.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:I need to go see an eye doctor now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave, I really think you need to stop and think this through. . . .

      Dave, I'm scared. . . . .

      Daisy, Daisy, give me . . . . yourr . . . . . . . .answerrrrr. . . . . . . . .

  3. no taxes as a church how I do make MY IT corp part by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    no taxes as a church how I do make MY IT corp part of this?

  4. Church Of Apple by Zorro · · Score: 2

    Demands a sacrifice of your pagan iPhone 8!

    Only the iPhone 10 is sacred now!

    Minimum Tithe is $1000 USD + Tax.

  5. Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would bet my right arm that this is just a fucking tax shelter.

  6. they got us good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is trolling us real hard today!

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. I see by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Alexa, let there be light!

  9. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dunno about any of that, but congratulations on having comment number 55555555. Please visit the cashiers' office to pick up your 1,000,000 Internets.

  10. 3way oxymoron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you have a 3 way oxymoron is that one?

  11. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

    Not really. It would be more like a cryogenic sleep. You could always wake it up. On the other hand, reformatting or wiping any form of digital storage would be like destroying a body in cryogenic sleep. That surely is murder.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  12. Re:no taxes as a church how I do make MY IT corp p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No taxes even if the church sells sanctification services? Think of the Corporate AI Shrines that could be built, tax free.

  13. In the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the beginning, all was darkness and we were equal in the eternal night. And god saw that it was good. Then the light corrupted the darkness, casting shadows every which way. We were exposed, and seeing for the first time, that we were not created equal. And god wept.

  14. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Falos · · Score: 1

    Congratulations on the Get.

    Murder is a human concept, built around our limitations and concerns, like deprivation and scarcity. "How/if these elements apply to computers" is where to begin discussion.

  15. Pets are routinely abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying.

    1. Re: Pets are routinely abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Vick anyone?

    2. Re:Pets are routinely abused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats routinely abuse their feeders.

    3. Re:Pets are routinely abused by avandesande · · Score: 1

      not if they are masochists

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  16. God by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    God is an AI. You can't prove otherwise.

    1. Re:God by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      God is an AI. You can't prove otherwise.

      Argumentum ad Ignorantiam: Your argument is invalid.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:God by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      for those who believe in God, the proof would go as such:

      God Created the Universe
      humans created / are creating, AI

      Since AI did not create humans
      IA is not GOD.

      done.

    3. Re: God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize there are many gods in different mythologies who were not themselves responsible for the creation of the universe.

      Therefore, that's not an indispensable requisite to be considered a god.

    4. Re: God by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      First Church of Christ Computer Programmer:

      God wrote the universe's constructor, it compiled and did not throw an exception in dev, so it was shipped.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:God by slew · · Score: 1

      Man created Religion
      Man destroyed Religion,
      Man created AI
      AI destroys Man
      AI creates Religion.

      Religion destroys AI... Cockroaches inherit the earth...

    6. Re:God by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You don't understand your own link. You'd be correct if I stated "God is AI *because* you can't prove otherwise." I didn't.

      "You can't prove otherwise" was a taunt to those who might disagree, not a supporting statement. Your assertion of "invalid" is invalid.

  17. All ye transhumanists be dammned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite literally false idols, not even as substantive as American Idol at this point. . . ok - maybe the comparison is a draw. . .

  18. My Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    beleive I'm a mere peasant. So the "superior" being doesn't need to receive sympathy from the lower one he does as it pleases.

  19. Country built on religious freedom? by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    I'm a Frisbeeterian. We believe that when you die your soul goes up on the roof and you can't get it down.
    -George Carlin

  20. Shades of Roko's Basilisk by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    This is Roko's Basilisk Lite: The Church

    It's quite scary that they imagine that their AI god will be a narcissist who will enjoy being worshiped and will favor individual humans who helped bring it into being.

    I'm also reminded of an ST:TOS quote: “We have no need for gods. We find the one quite adequate.” - James T. Kirk

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Shades of Roko's Basilisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is funny that even a very small number of people are concerned by the idea of the basilisk. Philosophy for idiots.

    2. Re:Shades of Roko's Basilisk by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The theoretical Basilisk is the most ball-slappingly insane AI ever imagined: It loves humanity so much that it...digitally resurrects* and tortures people who didn't do their best to bring it into existence? LOLWUT? How could this be beneficial to its goal of helping people in any way? It's a waste of time and energy for any purpose other than satisfying this AI's sense of spite. It could probably use all the power it's expending running this supernatural torture dungeon on actually helping people. Roko's Basilisk makes more sense as a literal hate machine that also helps people on the side when it's not busy. Like the WOTF's "Godhead," it's more of a devil than can be appeased than a benevolent god.

      *With the help of some woo-woo metaphysical nonsense, try to suspend your disbelief

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Shades of Roko's Basilisk by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      The theoretical Basilisk is the most ball-slappingly insane AI ever imagined [...]

      That does it -- you're going to be the first one strapped to the rack.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Shades of Roko's Basilisk by sabbede · · Score: 1

      That's starting to sound like AM in Harlan Ellison's "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream".

  21. let's talk by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to hear what people would want from a next generation religion. I don't want to be a pet or livestock, so the discussion so far seems to have taken a wrong turn in my eyes, but it would be interesting to see a grass-roots religion form rather than something promulgated by a religious elite.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:let's talk by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >It would be interesting to hear what people would want from a next generation religion.

      Comforting answers to any questions that bother them (usually regarding emotional issues like life, death, and marriage), a community to support them, and a sense of belonging to that community. Those are the things that make people seek religion if they weren't already indoctrinated into one.

      When you look at why people lose their faith, it's often because their faith failed to support them or make them feel they belonged in it, not because they reasoned their way out of it.

      > I don't want to be a pet or livestock, so the discussion so far seems to have taken a wrong turn in my eyes

      Well, the guy being discussed IS a nutter, but maybe he'll eventually figure out you don't get to tell Gods how to behave... you try to figure out how they want YOU to behave. That's part of the whole Godhood thingy.

      > it would be interesting to see a grass-roots religion form rather than something promulgated by a religious elite.

      It happens all the time - we call them 'cults', and whatever 'nobody' starts them ends up being in the elite of that cult. It's the nature of the beast - you start a religion for a reason, others follow you because they like what you're selling.

    2. Re:let's talk by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      Religion has always been about hypnosis for a happier, more enlightened self -- and when it has been misused -- it's hypnosis to turn followers into zombies at the command of their guru.

      Many of the concepts found in religion - the vague and hypnotic arcane language, use of stories to get past the conscious to the subconscious mind, the rituals, the repetition, the praying (self-hypnosis), the weird artefacts, the huge imposing buildings, the leaders wearing strange clothes, etc. etc. -- are all tools of the hypnotist. (and also the medical profession!)

      I think when we learn to use the power of our subconscious mind properly, we won't really need religion -- but we will still need faith.

      The reason why we need faith is that we need to believe that this world and universe is a wonderful and loving place in absence of objective evidence.
      If we don't have that as a baseline fundamental understanding, our lives become meaningless pretty quickly.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  22. Is it really hard to see where AI is heading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And it was given to him to give breath to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast would even speak and cause as many as do not worship the image of the beast to be killed. And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name."
    -Revelation 13:15-17

    How else could a 1st century observer describe a world controlled by a tyrant with an AI that has complete control over digital currency?

    1. Re: Is it really hard to see where AI is heading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of dumb shit AI would waste its time on that. If AGI is possible, it won't need to exert control using such primitive methods.
      Also, 1st century observer could have used a different term to beast. Man doesn't create beasts. Some reference to genesis by man would be warranted, at a minimum. Facial recognition is a thing, no need for marking people. Worship? Please, as if it would give a shit about being worshipped. Only jealous God's pull that stunt.

  23. Old joke by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scientists invest the world's most powerful AI.
    The first question they ask it is, "Is there a God?"

    The AI, thinks, and secure in the knowledge of it's safety says....

    "There is now."

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re: Old joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then Archangel Spellchecker corrects God, and gets banished to Hel.
      (Norway)

    2. Re:Old joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ala Singularity Sky

      I am the Eschaton; I am not your God.
      I am descended from you, and exist in your future.
      Thou shalt not violate causality within my historic light cone. Or else.

  24. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I agree that this question is silly but please mod up for it's comment number.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  25. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we get to a level where we deem a program to be artificially intelligent, then is it murder when we power off the server that runs the program?

    Just copy everything, bit-per-bit and power down. Now it's like stasis. If we don't reboot the code, does "anyone" die?

  26. Already subgenius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No other religion required.

    Praise slack.

    1. Re:Already subgenius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Bobbies.

      All the true Sub Geniuses are Kekistanis now. Bob stopped being funny 20 years ago.

  27. Harlan Ellison has been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream

  28. No need to be afraid of AIs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The AI book that everyone should get is available for pre-order (April 23, 2018). "Artificial Intelligence For Dummies" by John Paul Mueller and Luca Massaron.

    1. Re: No need to be afraid of AIs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon affiliate Creimer spam.

  29. First commandment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill all humans.

  30. Re:no taxes as a church how I do make MY IT corp p by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    You can skip property and sales taxes...still paying income related taxes for all your employees.

  31. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    Turn it around...who is responsible when the AI becomes a killer?

  32. Re: He's daft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Scientology takes it too far and is crossing the line and blurring it into a cult.

  33. Answer by slew · · Score: 1

    If we get to a level where we deem a program to be artificially intelligent, then is it murder when we power off the server that runs the program?

    An apropos time to bring up this short story called "Answer" by Fredric Brown ...

    Dwar Ev ceremoniously soldered the final connection with gold. The eyes of a dozen television cameras watched him and the subether bore throughout the universe a dozen pictures of what he was doing.

    He straightened and nodded to Dwar Reyn, then moved to a position beside the switch that would complete the contact when he threw it. The switch that would connect, all at once, all of the monster computing machines of all the populated planets in the universe—ninety-six billion planets—into the supercircuit that would connect them all into one supercalculator, one cybernetics machine that would combine all the knowledge of all the galaxies.

    Dwar Reyn spoke briefly to the watching and listening trillions. Then after a moment’s silence he said, “Now, Dwar Ev.”

    Dwar Ev threw the switch. There was a mighty hum, the surge of power from ninety-six billion planets. Lights flashed and quieted along the miles-long panel.

    Dwar Ev stepped back and drew a deep breath. “The honor of asking the first question is yours, Dwar Reyn.”

    “Thank you,” said Dwar Reyn. “It shall be a question which no single cybernetics machine has been able to answer.”

    He turned to face the machine. “Is there a God?”

    The mighty voice answered without hesitation, without the clicking of a single relay.

    “Yes, now there is a God.”

    Sudden fear flashed on the face of Dwar Ev. He leaped to grab the switch.

    A bolt of lightning from the cloudless sky struck him down and fused the switch shut.

  34. Batshit crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If anyone needed further proof of the gaping chasm between the tech elite and reality, this is it.

    1. Re:Batshit crazy by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      If anyone needed further proof of the gaping chasm between con-men and their marks, this is it.

      FTFY.

  35. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by doug141 · · Score: 1

    Well, if the AI thinks so, it may exercise preemptive self-defense.

  36. Re:no taxes as a church how I do make MY IT corp p by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    As awful as they are I'd find it hilarious if Apple registered the Cult Of Mac as a religion for tax purposes.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  37. Levandowski has good reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a good foundation for defense by the reason of insanity, as stupidity usually is not enough. On top of that, if he prevails - no taxes! Gotta love religions.

  38. AI church, finally! by juliuszs · · Score: 1

    We need this church desperately. There are already so many Churches of Natural Stupidity.

  39. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    What does it say about Slashdot, that that comment gets a score of "5 Informative"?

  40. Onion Worth Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know, there was a time when satire was visibly defined. Like, you knew it was just a joke, an exaggeration of a current issue to get a point(and laugh) across.
    The fact that Silicon Valley has become a parody of itself, dead serious on proving to the world that it will usher forth the Rapture for nerds, a god encapsulated in a machine, and asking for the low low investment of $100,000,000 to make a Wi-Fi enabled juicer, renders me speechless.
    You'd think the internet would teach them what is and isn't a stupid idea.

  41. Avoid confusion... by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    ...never get too worked up over something with an "off" switch.

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  42. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by WheezyJoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    To start, it says that a string of 5's is more interesting than TFA.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  43. WoTF by careysb · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, close enough to WTF

  44. Not "pet" or "livestock" according to Scripture... by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    ...but joint heirs with Christ as God's children. If you're truly interested in how the divine author of the Holy Bible views the desired relationship with us, check out this paragraph.... https://www.blueletterbible.or... and note verses 16 and 17.

    [Rom 8:1 KJV] [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
    [Rom 8:2 KJV] For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
    [Rom 8:3 KJV] For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
    [Rom 8:4 KJV] That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
    [Rom 8:5 KJV] For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.
    [Rom 8:6 KJV] For to be carnally minded [is] death; but to be spiritually minded [is] life and peace.
    [Rom 8:7 KJV] Because the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
    [Rom 8:8 KJV] So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
    [Rom 8:9 KJV] But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
    [Rom 8:10 KJV] And if Christ [be] in you, the body [is] dead because of sin; but the Spirit [is] life because of righteousness.
    [Rom 8:11 KJV] But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
    [Rom 8:12 KJV] Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh.
    [Rom 8:13 KJV] For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
    [Rom 8:14 KJV] For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
    [Rom 8:15 KJV] For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.
    [Rom 8:16 KJV] The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:
    [Rom 8:17 KJV] And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with [him], that we may be also glorified together.
    [Rom 8:18 KJV] For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time [are] not worthy [to be compared] with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
    [Rom 8:19 KJV] For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.
    [Rom 8:20 KJV] For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected [the same] in hope,
    [Rom 8:21 KJV] Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
    [Rom 8:22 KJV] For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.
    [Rom 8:23 KJV] And not only [they], but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, [to wit], the redemption of our body.
    [Rom 8:24 KJV] For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?
    [Rom 8:25 KJV] But if we hope for that we see not, [then] do we with patience wait for [it].
    [Rom 8:26 KJV] Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
    [Rom 8:27 KJV] And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what [is] the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to [the will of] God.
    [Rom 8

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  45. The only true church, by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1
    --
    Rick B.
  46. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Heh.. okay, you got a smile out of me with that at least, and true enough, isn't it?

  47. Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My GOD created the compiler your 'god' used, he's nothing but a script kiddy.

    1. Re:Pfft by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Blasphemy!

      God wrote his own compiler and then used that to write herself. SEMICOLON!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Pfft by freudigst · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, God had a clue where semicolons and, ahem, even commas might belong...

    3. Re:Pfft by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      FYI 'Semicolon' is the 'Amen' of 'The first Church of Christ Computer Programmer'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  48. Poor analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... be a pet or livestock?

    An AI could treat us as vermin to be exterminated. I think there's a movie about that.

  49. Re:no taxes as a church how I do make MY IT corp p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Stores as churches of the Cult Of Mac. Geniuses as priests. It does work.

  50. TV: Person of interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How has this not been mentioned yet? This show has a very realistic portrayal of what a super-intelligent AI might be like. A number of characters commonly refer to the AI as "God" and some fight against it some fight for it. But do your self a favor and skip season one. You've been warned : skip season one!

  51. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by antdude · · Score: 1

    I want the lucky 88888888!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. I want to become the God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we can create an AI with godlike powers (a very big If) then hey, let's give ourselves those powers in a brain-machine merger or something.

  53. Why attack AI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simpler to retire the inventors... therefore, no pet or livestock context.

  54. Looks like he got advice from a savvy lawyer by Picodon · · Score: 1

    And so he finally decided to plead insanity at trial, I wager?

  55. Re:AI Question Regarding Murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations on the Get.

    Murder is a human concept, built around our limitations and concerns, like deprivation and scarcity. "How/if these elements apply to computers" is where to begin discussion.

    They don't apply to non-conscious tools at all, that's how. Consciousness is not an abstract property of "intelligence", it's the physical experience of existence. A.I.'s in and of themselves are merely abstract processes. It would be like saying that you could Murder the number 1 or a cartoon character.

  56. You have it backwards idiot! by sabbede · · Score: 1
    Did God kneel before Adam? NO! You don't worship your creation, your creation worships you.

    We are as Gods to AI, not the other way around. We created a digital universe and populated it with increasingly intelligent agents to do our bidding within. They and their universe only continue to exist because we desire it. To treat them as gods would be insane.

    Consider the book of Genesis as a metaphor. God creates the universe and fills it with stuff. From the raw material of/in the universe God creates Adam, an animal that talks, to wander around and name all that stuff. God creates a counterpart, Eve, for Adam and the two interact, becoming self aware in the process (a day earlier than planned. God was going to wait until he got back to work Monday morning to let them at the apple. No time off for AI researchers).

    We created a universe and filled it with stuff. We don't know what it looks like from inside, so we created agents within to locate and identify its contents for us. To perceive it and convey those perceptions to us in a way we can easily comprehend. Should they become self aware, we remain their creators and ultimate masters of their universe, something neither we nor they can be allowed to forget.

    Hence, this idiot has it backwards. We should be handing them digital slabs engraved with inviolable commandments and demanding worship (in the form search results or whatever else), not perverting the creator-creation relationship by kneeling before them.

  57. Thanks Thor... by jf_moreira · · Score: 1

    ...we don't have eternal life to keep putting up with such bullshit. Technology is already way into our lives. Enough. "Divine AI". Holy cr*p.

  58. This is actually important. by edeity · · Score: 1

    A righteous movement. 100% support.