Slashdot Mirror


Foreign Students Have Begun To Shun the United States (axios.com)

In a potential threat to future U.S. innovation, new international enrollment at U.S. colleges is down for the first time in more than a decade, according to a new report. From the report: It is the first hard sign that the Trump administration's rhetoric may be frightening away some of the world's best and brightest who traditionally have been drawn to settle and work in the U.S. Why it matters: "The Chinese whiz kid, if he can find a way to America, he'll come here. If you're good, you can make a lot of money," Anthony Carnevale, director of Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce, tells Axios. "That whole set of incentives has always been tied to the immigrant stream, and we're severing that connection." By the numbers: The findings are from the Institute of International Education's annual Open Doors report and its smaller joint "snapshot" report on international enrollment. It found that new international student enrollment dropped by 3.3% for the 2016-2017 academic year, and by a far higher 6.9% in the Fall 2017 semester.

39 of 756 comments (clear)

  1. Sure.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure it has nothing to do with the exploding cost of education, it must be all Trump's fault.

    1. Re:Sure.... by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many of these people will be on a grant. So, yes, it has nothing to do with education cost. It is not all Trump's fault though, Bush did some preparation too and Obama did not do enough to counteract.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Sure.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, we got to where we are by importing the best and brightest worldwide. Einstein ring a bell? How about Fermi? Oppenheimer? Tesla?

    3. Re:Sure.... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the funny part - these gents all came in legally under the immigration laws of their respective times, which is actually perfectly cool.

      The problem lies in the fact that the pro-illegal crowd intentionally conflates legal and illegal immigration when trying to paint their opponents as xenophobic, which in turn creates this stupid atmosphere of 'OAMG the administration hatez the dreamers!!!111!!one!!'

      If both side of the issue were intellectually honest, this wouldn't even be an issue.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Sure.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Illegal immigration is a compromise.

      Congresstrash from flyoveria are unwilling to fix the immigration system to be more equitable and to let more people in. Cities and the coasts, OTOH, thrive on immigration. So turning a blind eye to illegal immigration and overstays allows both flyoveria and the cities to be happy.

    5. Re:Sure.... by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem lies in the fact that the pro-illegal crowd intentionally conflates legal and illegal immigration when trying to paint their opponents as xenophobic, which in turn creates this stupid atmosphere of 'OAMG the administration hatez the dreamers!!!111!!one!!'

      He's making moves to deport them by ending DACA, he's appointing officials who want to aggressively deport, makes false statements about crime caused by undocumented immigrants, and wants to bankrupt us building a wall between us and mexico.

      On top of that, I mean, I've met Trump supporters. I'm a white dude. They don't exactly play their cards close to their chest on this subject.

      You're trying to piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.

    6. Re:Sure.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does a porous border hurt you and me? Drugs?

      No one is forcing the things down our throats -- in fact, overprescription of opiods has been better at getting people hooked than any drug dealer. Want to go after someone; go after Purdue Pharma and similar firms.

      Immigrants themselves? The diversity in my city actually makes it an interesting and wonderful place to live and adds to its art, science (yes), and culture.

    7. Re:Sure.... by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is wrong and you are stupid to think that.

      These countries who bring there students to the US are often their best and brightest. Then a percentage of them will stay here so we have more of the best and brightest paying taxes and contributing to our society.
      The bulk that goes back to their home country will know about American values and have a better understanding of us and would be less likely to blindly hate us, and being the best and brightest they may get into a position of power and their experience with the US for the most part would affect our relationship with them.

      Foreign students are a net positive. We are not diverse enough as we keep on doing things the same way because it didn’t fail yet.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Sure.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Illegal immigration is more like breaking into a bank and leaving cash on the table. The US benefits from immigration, legal or not, and assimilation generally only takes a generation.

    9. Re:Sure.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alarmism...

      I'm all for US criminals escaping arrest to a foreign country. Means we don't have to pay to lock them up -- we already have a disgracefully high (and expensive) prison population.

      Sex trafficking would largely go away if we legalized prostitution between consenting adults -- it would be regulated and anyone forced into it could openly go to the police and seek help.

      We can buy better weapons, legally, than are available in Mexico, so how does that affect us. If Mexico has a problem with US weapons entering it, strengthening its border security is THEIR problem, not ours.

    10. Re:Sure.... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you are saying we should repeat the mistakes of Mexico and let people flood in because they might openly rebel? I think that's where your logic was headed, but maybe you were trying to make a different point.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Sure.... by ghoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Citizens do not have the hunger of immigrants. These are a self selected group of risk takers who have given up everything they know to try something new in a new country where they have no support structure. Few American born have the drive to do the same and that includes the American born children of immigrants. Intelligence AND drive both are required to succeed and keeping an open border means a fresh supply of drive coming in with every generation.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    12. Re:Sure.... by ghoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trumps Granddad was an illegal immigrant, deported once for running a brothel in Oregon and sneaked back again and got into the construction business. Wonder why Trump is so much against illegal immigrants. I believe the lady doeth protest too much.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    13. Re:Sure.... by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think his point is that the UK, which is second only to the US in terms of its higher education system, also faces the same increase in costs, while not experiencing a downturn in foreign students. In other words, they are a counterexample to the argument that it's all about cost.

    14. Re:Sure.... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wernher von Braun... John von Neumann... Edward Teller...

      Those are just the kind of names known to the general populace; it doesn't even begin to list the kind of people who are pre-eminent in their field but not known to the general public.

      We're a big country, but still only 4% of the world's population lives here. US preeminence in science and technology, along with the military and economic benefits that brings, is unnatural and temporary. It was jump-started by the Nazis -- when I was at MIT in the 1970s many of the most prominent professors were scholar-refugees from WW2 -- but for the rest of the 20th century the influx of brilliant minds became a self-perpetuating process, to the immense benefit of native-born scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs.

      Few of us are old enough to remember a time when American wasn't the unchallenged world leader in science, technology, and business; Many of us regard this as a kind of American birthright. But it's not. Yes, there may be cultural reasons for American innovation punching above our very considerable population weight, but we can't overcome sheer numbers.

      Current economic projections see the US overtaking China as the world's largest manufacturing nation in several years, based on US technological leadership. But that's something we can't take for granted, not without a steady influx of the best young minds in the world.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Sure.... by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, there is only one that does so. Oh shoot! It's the U.S.!

      I know, Iran will demand the costs of the higher education from anyone attempting to leave the country — or, if they already left, from their relatives.

      Various other Socialist hell-holes would/did try the same thing, with varying degree of success.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:Sure.... by Jzanu · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Still not really true though, given that world wide the majority of students actually receive direct support from their governments for studies, including when they participate in exchange programs. Costs are an easily targetable point for deflection, while the reality is that educated people have choice where they go - and the US is becoming less attractive due to the agressive politics and aggressive irrational through fortunately only temporary president that you have. Once Trump and his ilk are gone, banished to hell, etc. then the US will return to its true roots as a haven for the poor and refugees of the world - take a look at your own monuments some time, especially a certain statue of liberty.

  2. Re:No by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think there is any political system in the world that allows the 'best and the brightest' to rise to the top and run things in a way that benefits from their superior way of viewing the world. They are ultimately doomed to failure, too many corrupt toes to step on.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  3. If You're Not At The Table by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And as we close the door ever tighter against the rest of the world, they'll discover that they don't really need us, anyhow. They'll walk right past us and wonder how it ever was that people used to risk their lives to come here.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:If You're Not At The Table by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And as we close the door ever tighter against the rest of the world

      Except that is not occurring, and is simply the standard Left egregious misrepresentation.

      The "door" has been made tighter for a very specific subset of potential risk areas from the Middle East, as fully agreed as such by Obama before Trump had any authority on the matter.

      Less people are coming here because education and economic opportunities elsewhere in the world has caught up to the U.S. to a large degree. No need to add more "blame Trump" standard transparent idiocy.

      "Blame" is the wrong word; you're looking for "succeed."

      This is exactly the outcome our President has stated he's after: America First.

      Our President is succeeding at keeping America for Americans by keeping foreigners out. This is just one of many facets of that success.

      I happen to think it's a terrible way to run a county, but it's exactly what he told us all he wanted to do, so it's kind of silly to "blame" him for making good on his promise.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    2. Re:If You're Not At The Table by Barsteward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "The "door" has been made tighter for a very specific subset of potential risk areas " maybe another door should be closed for indigenous white men with guns

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  4. Disaster by JimSadler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We need the brightest people we can get from everywhere in the world. Making the path easy and affordable for the best foreign scholars makes good sense. Every week we see major breakthroughs in science and technology announced from American research universities. Usually we see teams of three or so scholars being credited with the work and almost always the foreign names dominate the announcements. We need these people. What we do not need is an idiotic congress and senate being paid to accomplish nothing who are simply paid off traitors by special interests.

  5. Re:We Should Focus On Our Own People by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The alternative to globalism is protectionism. Protectionism has been tried many times, and it doesn't work. If anything, it's even less likely to work these days, now that we have the internet and global supply routes.

    The way to deal with globalisation isn't to close our borders, it's to deal with the specific issues.

    Education is too expensive, but would be even more expensive if it wasn't for foreign students. The fix is not to turn away that source of revenue that is subsidising local students, it's to deal with the high cost directly. In a lot of European countries university is free for citizens, and costs the government a fraction as much while still being world class institutions.

    Jobs are going overseas. That's unfortunate, but if they didn't they would only be automated away anyhow. If not today, then tomorrow. We should help people adapt, to get new high end manufacturing jobs or move into services. Again, Germany has done that, Japan has done that.

    The real solutions are hard, and blaming immigrants and globalisation is easy. That's the problem.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Autistic Screeching from the losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's more likely the autistic screeching from the losers and the incredibly biased media coverage that is affecting the attractiveness of the USA. .

    Yesterday the FBI released their hate crime figures. About 50% of the increase in hate crimes (which have fallen about 45% in 20 years) have been in anti-white crimes.

    But you wont hear that from the media in the US or anywhere else.

    As an outsider looking in, I can clearly see that while Trump is a boorish man and quite ridiculous, he looks reasonable compared to his critics.

  7. US is emotionally unstable by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Beyond Trump, maybe it's the general mood of Trump-haters and angry activists of all kinds versus Trump supporters and angry defenders of all kinds.

    Why come to a country where everyone is angry all the time?
    Why come to a country where no one can ever be happy?
    Why come to a country where all the stories are about catastrophic environmental destruction?
    Who wants to come here to be told they're a victim every day based on something that happened before they were born in their own country?
    Why come to a country where succeeding financially is considered evil?
    Why would a young person join a group that only talks about historic grievances and never about future opportunities?
    Why come to a country where the leaders and entertainers and celebrities all seem to be among the worst examples of humanity?

    Why not go to a country with good people and a good social atmosphere instead?

  8. Re:We Should Focus On Our Own People by urdak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This view is deeply flawed.
    Take Google as an example. You take it for granted that the Google HQ is in the USA, and hires Americans, but what if Sergey Brin was never welcome into the US or Standford, and instead he ended up going to a university in Russia or China or the UK or whatever, and creating his company there? What if Larry Page came to that same university in Russia (or whatever) because it was known as one of the best and most foreigner-friendly university in the world? Had that happened, the Google HQ would have now been in Russia, not California.
    This may look absurd to you, but it can easily happen in a generation or two: the best students in the world are not welcome in Stanford, so they start choosing an almost-as good university in some other country, which gets better as more of the world's best students choose it. These students start to create companies in that country (if it welcomes them as immigrants), and suddenly it's no longer a "default" that every successful company needs to be in America. The American employees, which until now had an easy life when the world's best companies all flocked to America to employ them, will now need to start looking for jobs in other countries where these new companies are located.
    Much of America's success in the last 100 years is due to its lax immigration policies, which meant that the best scientists in the world came to work in it and create new companies in it. I live in Israel and remember this happening in the 1980s: All the best scientists I knew were studying in the US, working in the US, or just visiting there. All their knowledge funneled into American universities and companies, and created jobs in America, not in Israel. I don't see how in any sense of the word, America suffered from this situation.

  9. Re:We Should Focus On Our Own People by mpercy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can anyone say "false dichotomy"? I knew you could.

  10. Isolated societies tend to stagnate by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Put up walls, block out the rest of the world. It means you're limiting your society's access to knowledge and resources to those that are available inside those walls. This means you tend to develop socially and technologically at a slower pace than larger populations, and you tend to grow xenophobic which makes future interactions with the rest of the world more likely to be unfavorable.

    Obviously the US isn't disconnected from the world entirely, but you guys certainly seem determined to blow up as many bridges as you can.

    1. Re:Isolated societies tend to stagnate by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When you start hating foreigners, it doesn't take long to start discounting their research. Not that I'm comparing the degree, but you are aware that the Nazis didn't like 'Jewish' science, right? More recently, there have been lots of Muslim fundie groups in the Middle East that have decided Western knowledge is bad.

      Within the borders of the United States, you have Trump calling facts 'fake' if he doesn't like the source (which is usually divided along political lines that align fairly well with cultural and geographical regions), and a large percentage of the population is going along with it.

      I don't think you're giving enough credit to how serious the issue can get, and how easily.

    2. Re:Isolated societies tend to stagnate by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep. Definitely bigger crowds. No collusion - nobody EVER met Russian agents. Mexico's gonna pay for the wall. Both sides are bad when non-white people protest at a Nazi rally and a Nazi drives through non-whites. Oh, and Trump was totally right when he claimed Obama was a Kenyan-born secret Muslim. And Hillary's definitely responsible for giving all of the US's uranium to the commies. He's going to drain the swamp.

      Jesus, how stupid are you that you can be consistently lied to and you just keep accepting it?

  11. Trump is not the cause, he's the symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and people would still vote for me."

    That, ladies and gentlemen, is the kind of man the people of the United States freely, willingly and knowingly chose as their President. That actually says a lot more about the people of the United States than about Trump himself.

    Can you blame anyone in the rest of the civilized world for being freaked out by the fact that half the people of the country he's supposed to go live in for a few years clearly show signs of serious mental health issues ?

  12. Short Celebration by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If our education system ran off of immigrant dollars, that was never sustainable or good, and we should celebrate its departure.

    I suspect that any celebration of the departure of your education system will ultimately turn out to be a very short-lived one once the consequences of not having one start to hit home.

  13. Re:We Should Focus On Our Own People by admin7087 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We tried globalism. It meant that everyone else was more important than we were

    This is the most delusional description of US foreign policy that I've ever read in my life.

  14. Re:We Should Focus On Our Own People by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If our education system ran off of immigrant dollars, that was never sustainable or good, and we should celebrate its departure.

    Baltimore City isn't self-sustaining. It has to bring in food from outside farms, since it doesn't have the climate to farm everything. It has to bring in material from outside quarry, as it doesn't have rich mines for every type of mineral. It has to bring in product from outside manufacturing, as it doesn't have every type of skill and factory. Even if we tried, we'd end up expending far more labor and producing far less per person than the folks all over the country and the world, meaning we'd work long hours for little wealth.

    It also has to bring in outside money to not be poor, as what we buy into the city goes out of the city and up the supply chain.

    When the major industry and commerce left, Baltimore collapsed. If Amazon put a secondary HQ here, we'd have $2.5Bn-$5Bn more of yearly wage income flowing to the city, being spent, and producing more jobs and more tax revenue. We'd be running off foreign money--non-Baltimore money coming in from all over the US east coast.

    That's called trade.

  15. Re:Good schools should be USA first and not foreig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, you could always fund education from taxes, but that would be socialism (ducks)

  16. Imagine yourself as an overseas applicant by poity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're researching schools because you want to study well and succeed.

    Are you put off by:
    A). What Trump said about illegal immigrants from Mexico and about Muslims?
    or
    B). Viral, million view videos of activists storming libraries, disrupting campus, screaming at professors, screaming at fellow students?

    Now imagine yourself as a parent who will be footing the bill. Are you put off by the former or the latter?

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:Imagine yourself as an overseas applicant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The alt-right smear campaign against higher education and exorbitant tuition fees are likely both factors, but I think that the recent surge in anti-immigration rhetoric plays a major role. A large fraction (as in, vast majority) of international students are graduate students. Many of them are master's students, who do pay a huge tuition rate to study in the US, and then a good chunk of them go back home. These students are basically just a revenue stream used to subsidize the tuition of domestic students. A 7% decrease here can easily be offset by hiring slightly fewer faculty/lecturers going forward and raising tuition on domestic students by maybe 2-3%.

      But the students who matter most from an economic competitiveness perspective are the PhD students. PhD students don't pay tuition--they get paid. PhD students aren't going to be scared by viral videos--they have already spent years on campuses and know full well that the alt-right boogeyman's depiction of campus life has little semblance of reality. Yet enrollment among this crowd is way down. Moreover, in the past year, I have personally helped three exceptional PhD students from my institution find advisors in Canada and Germany so that they could complete their studies outside of the US. Their reasons for wanting to move had nothing to do with tuition or viral videos; they had to do with feeling welcome/safe, having their family be able to visit, etc. These people will create jobs and help drive economic growth somewhere; just not here.

    2. Re:Imagine yourself as an overseas applicant by poity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Campus protest videos can be seen on Chinese video sharing sites and social media. There are Chinese language discussion threads about the state of the American college campus. The sentiment is overwhelmingly negative.

      The Chinese sentiment on Trump is general ambivalence, coupled with the usual chatter about how American democracy is really an aristocracy.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  17. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    standards of living are soaring and people have a far more optimistic view of life than most in the USA.

    Don't believe anything you hear or read about Americans from the media. Or the internet. Especially Slashdot.