Slashdot Mirror


An Ethereum Startup Just Vanished After People Invested $374K (vice.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: A startup on the Ethereum platform vanished from the internet on Sunday after raising $374,000 USD from investors in an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) fundraiser. Confido is a startup that pitched itself as a blockchain-based app for making payments and tracking shipments. It sold digital tokens to investors over the Ethereum blockchain in an ICO that ran from November 6 to 8. During the token sale, Confido sold people bespoke digital tokens that represent their investment in exchange for ether, Ethereum's digital currency. But on Sunday, the company unceremoniously deleted its Twitter account and took down its website. A company representative posted a brief comment to the company's now-private subforum on Reddit, citing legal problems that prevent the Confido team from continuing their work. The same message was also posted to Medium but quickly deleted.

"Right now, we are in a tight spot, as we are having legal trouble caused by a contract we signed," the message stated (a cached version of the Medium post is viewable). "It is likely that we will be able to find a solution to rectify the situation. However, we cannot assure you with 100% certainty that we will get through this." The message was apparently written by Confido's founder, one Joost van Doorn, who seems to have no internet presence besides a now-removed LinkedIn profile. Even the Confido representative on Reddit doesn't seem to know what's going on, though, posting hours after the initial message, "Look I have absolutely no idea what has happened here. The removal of all of our social media platforms and website has come as a complete surprise to me." Confido tokens had a market cap of $10 million last week, before the company disappeared, but now the tokens are worthless. And investors are crying foul.

190 comments

  1. Another ICO, another SCAM. by Kremmy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the track record of the Initial Coin Offering. And people keep putting money into them.

    1. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a sucker born every minute.

      It was true 150 years ago, it's true today.

    2. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A fool and their money, were lucky to get together in the first place.

      It is an immoral act to let a sucker keep his money.

      Good for confido...Confido? They had 'confidence game' right in their name folks.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think "I've got a coinbase to sell you" will emerge as the new "I've got a bridge in brooklyn to sell you"

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    4. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is the track record of the Initial Coin Offering. And people keep putting money into them.

      Based on historical precedent, the third and largest collapse of a scammy ICO will be the pin that pops the cryptocurrency bubble.

    5. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *bad thing happens* "THIS IS EXACTLY LIKE TRUMP!!"

      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/two-minute-shrink/201006/taming-obsessive-thoughts

    6. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      It's like 1980 in Los Angeles and Pyramid Parties all over again.

      At least in 1980 you could see if there was anyone behind you in line to get in.

    7. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      I guess the money went in to ether :-)

      I get a kick of millennials that invest in cryptocurrency.

      I guess it's time to learn.

    8. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      ^^^ Ditto. Van Douche was probably represented by Dewey, Cheatam, and Howe LLP.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    9. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

      Considering Crypto has exploded in return on investment, the suckers are those that show up too late to the game. Bitcoin has been up and running for 9 years with explosive price gains... when did you buy again? Oh you missed out? Bitter? That explains it.

      --
      No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    10. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a kick out of you old farts that like to blame everything on millenials. Upset you didnâ(TM)t make 10000% gains on BTC or ETH? Probably because the concept of blockchain is too great for your feeble mind to comprehend

    11. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known more 40 something tech nerds than millennials buying into this crap.

    12. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol it'll be so sweet when it all comes crashing down which is an inevitability.

    13. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had not heard about the pyramid parties of the 80's, but Google gave me some interesting articles. Thank's for sharing--I learned a bit of modern history!

    14. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I guess the money went in to ether :-)

      I get a kick of millennials that invest in cryptocurrency.

      I guess it's time to learn.

      Because only millennials make poor money decisions? Because only block chain businesses fail? Or did you just block Enron from your mind? Bernie Madoff? Charles Ponzi?

    15. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Because when most startups failed, that stopped venture capitalism...

    16. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bitcoin is in for a hell of a ride. Big money vulture capitalist have statistically analysed there is sufficient real money around bitcoin to harvest by purposefully hugely fluctuating the price of bit coin. UP, down, UP, down, UP, down, always milking cash out of the fools in the cycle, it is going to be really cruel. They will keep riding bitcoin until the kill it, little money does not stand a chance against big money, in a ponzi play like bitcoin, it's price as has been demonstrated can be all too readily pumped or dumped.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might pop the ethereum bubble, but I think bitcoin is here to stay.

      The blockchain basically has one use: cryptocurrency. Any other use and you're probably just getting sucked into a scam.

    18. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      *bad thing happens* "THIS IS EXACTLY LIKE TRUMP!!"

      I'm confused. Over a hundred responses and this is the ONLY mention of whatzis name. At least there's a helpful reference to obsessive thought patterns. That helps indicate one AC with OCPD.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    19. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few million USD is a drop in a bucket in the crypto markets..

    20. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are my mod points when I need them :D

    21. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      Only way to kill bitcoin at this point is by somehow figuring out a way to kill the global trade in narcotics, unlicensed firearms, fake documents and all the other contraband bitcoin has become the go-to currency for... When just about all of stuff that's bought using bitcoin is illegal making bitcoin itself illegal isn't really going to do anything except inconvenience the people using it to buy and sell narcotics, etc.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    22. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but it put a much higher bar to verification for investment by venture capitalists and by companies and sites that allow for such investment, ICO's have no such checks.

    23. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a kick out of you young whippersnappers who think that just because something worked out that it must have been a smart thing to do.

    24. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already know what stops narc trade. Legalization of narcotics which means denying a source of income from criminals.

    25. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy behind the startup is laughing all the way to the bank... ka-ching!

    26. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Not so - the sucker birth-rate has been increasing roughly exponentially.

    27. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      That might pop the ethereum bubble, but I think bitcoin is here to stay.

      The blockchain basically has one use: cryptocurrency. Any other use and you're probably just getting sucked into a scam.

      Except that the blockchain as implemented in BTC is not scaling. Transaction times are stretching into days and open-market transaction fees are now greater than many small transactions, all besides the basic problem of limited money supply. It has already failed as a currency.

    28. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Tonight I'm gonna party like it's 1929...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you actually believe the dumb things you write, don't you?

    30. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What "stopped" VC is simply that there is nothing worthwhile left to invest in.

      You see, investors want to see a ROI. That can only happen, of course, if the business you invest in can actually, well, do business. And for this you need customers. And customers are rare, considering that all the money is neatly tucked away on the supply side. There is simply no demand, at least by no means enough to warrant VCing in some new businesses.

      So those VCs and their load of surplus money were looking for something to pump that money into. Something where a sensible ROI is still to be had.

      Now ponder for a moment what this could possibly be.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But this isn't a pyramid scheme. It's more a trapezoid.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Every generation has its tulips. In the '80s, it was Cabbage Patch Kids. The 1990s brought Pogs and .com 1.0 companies (pets.com, flooz, beenz.)

      What we are going to see is cryptocurrencies hyped up, a nasty collapse happen, then they will go back to a sane level and wind up a useful way of doing value exchanges once the "ooo, shiny" aspect is gone. Cryptocurrencies are a good concept, but because the shysters are back (a lot of them fled when Mt. Gox fell flat), it is something to stay away from for now.

      I also don't see anything wrong with an ICO, provided the currency has undergone some scrutiny and has something it can bring to the table that is noticeably better than Ethereum or BitCoin (not having to run through the entire blockchain to validate a transaction, a way of doing anonymity similar to a Chaumian currency, some way of protecting against 51% attacks, etc.) However, with all the cryptocurrencies out there, it would have to be extremely unique and innovative to be worth investors' time.

    33. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      BitCoin is becoming pretty unwieldy with the time to process transactions. Even with taking shortcuts, the time it takes is taking steadily longer to process (days in some instances), the blockchain is getting a lot larger, around 145 gigs, and the concern about existing issues like the 51%+ mining bloc.

      BitCoin is a great "version 2.0" cryptocurrency, with "version 1.0" being Chaum's DigiCash. What is needed is a "version 3.0" currency that has some way to keep one group from getting to the 51% mark, some anonymity like the blinding factor in Chaum's currency, ease of mining, various escrow/signature methods, a way to only have to parse a subset of the blockchain and not worry about being double-spent, ability to have older transactions be archived from the blockchain to save space, a mechanism to have exponentially more blocks added when needed, so the amount of energy it takes to mine a coin stays about the same, and perhaps have the upper bound of coins be related to how many coins are in use.

    34. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Considering Crypto has exploded in return on investment, the suckers are those that show up too late to the game. Bitcoin has been up and running for 9 years with explosive price gains... when did you buy again? Oh you missed out? Bitter? That explains it.

      I'd be curious to know how many people have actually cached out their bitcoin to realize their gain. It's one thing to have $100,000 worth of bitcoin, and another to have that $100,000 in your bank account.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    35. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      *bad thing happens* "THIS IS EXACTLY LIKE TRUMP!!"

      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/two-minute-shrink/201006/taming-obsessive-thoughts

      Well, to be fair, he does bear a striking resemblance to many bad things.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    36. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is also immoral to take money from people via fraud. Anyone who pretends taking money from suckers is moral, is a greedy piece of shit themselves and also doesn't deserve any money.

    37. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the limited money supply one of the features? posting AC because I modded people.

    38. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A sucker will be separated from his/her money. It's just a question of who/when.

      By definition: the highest utility is for me to get it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It is an immoral act to let a sucker keep his money.

      Then how come we have government assistance programs?
      If it's an immoral act to let a sucker keep their money, then it's EVEN MORE IMMORTAL to have laws
      that forcibly take money from non-suckers and then reward it to Able-Bodied people who are probably mostly
      suckers Or are of the same mentality (couldn't even find/plan/execute on a way to earn a decent living.....)

      Also, why don't we do the responsible thing and detect the suckers' and re-allocate their money to a good cause?
      Proposition: Re-Legalize standard internet gambling with a regulated rate of profit; this should draw the ICO "investors" back to gambling ,
      and have essentially a 45% government tax on each bet.

          In other words: you bet $1000 on blackjack --- your cumulative total is a $1000 loss, the house starts with $1000, but has to pay the gov't $450 in betting taxes on their winnings from your bets and gets to keep $550.

          If you bet $1000 on blackjack and your cumulative winnings across the games are $1000 --- you get $550, because the casino is allowed to withhold your $450 bet tax from winnings, and then you go home and pay income tax on the $550.

    40. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, see, you don't understand. Trump defines scam, and everything about it, the psychology, everything. Trump = scam*fraud^2

    41. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them :D

      Save 'em. You have just witnessed roman_mir karma whoring with his sock puppet. Use mod points on comments that actually deserve to be moderated up instead.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    42. Re: Another ICO, another SCAM. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Isn't the limited money supply one of the features? posting AC because I modded people.

      Mathematically limited money supply was intended to make Bitcoin immune to inflation. This worked; since BTC was invented, the algorithm has never been cracked and the money supply has been asymptotically edging toward the limit of 21 million coins as new coin is mined.

      What the Bitcoiners failed to realize is that if you hold the supply of a money constant, it loses its value as a neutral medium of exchange because people perceive it as becoming more valuable with time. It gets hoarded, and this is what is happening with Bitcoin. When BYC first went on the air, coins were priced low and people rushed to buy things with them. Now people buy BTC only in hopes that they can sell it for more later.

      Real national currencies are managed by central banks whose job it is to keep the money supply growing at ideally the same rate at which the sum of all goods the currency can be traded for grows. Because currencies are political, there is a general tendency to print a little more each year than the value of goods has actually grown. This is called inflation, and so long as the percentage change each year stays small, people will use the currency to buy things with but are not motivated to hoard it.

      Look at the history of gold. Gold has always enjoyed value because the amount of it grows only very slowly with new mining and there is no low-value simulant that has the same density and was available in the times when gold was used as everyday money. In ancient and medieval times, gold could be used directly as money because the good it traded for had the same total value year after year. But as soon as the Enlightenment and the Industrial revolution started increasing the value of traded goods, those goods in trade drove gold out of circulation by making gold a hoarded commodity. Countries began printing fiat money for everyday transactions. Today gold holds its value and with monetary inflation increases in value relative to fiat monies - it is hoarded. Bitcoin is just an attempt to recreate gold as a digital medium.

    43. Re:Another ICO, another SCAM. by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      Pyramid Parties

      I also wrote like, which means similar, but not the same.

  2. a fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a fool and their bitcoin are (always) easily parted

  3. Scammed by mysidia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry.... you weren't acting like investors if you bought ICO tokens that don't even represent legal shares of a business with so little information and so little in the way of business documentation and personal guarantees OR audited financials, and you should have been more careful.

    That's just a good ol' fashioned scam; let the ICO buyer beware.

    1. Re:Scammed by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      When the guy the main character in The Wolf of Wall Street was based on says something is scummier than anything he ever pulled, you know that thing is very suspect and any money invested in it should probably be considered forfeit.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    2. Re: Scammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry...

      Not accepted. Unless you tell us what part you played in this, you gutless shit mysidia.

    3. Re:Scammed by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There were as much investors as kickstarter backers are VCs.

      But people like being called something that's associated with being rich and knowing how to invest, so...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Scammed by mysidia · · Score: 1

      There were as much investors as kickstarter backers are VCs.

      At least the kickstarter listings aren't the sale of Unregistered Securities like most ICOs are,
      and with kickstarter there's a certain level of disclosure and professionallism required to get a listing approved,
      and finally the expected "return" is for a small token prize, Not an implication that buyers will profit in some manner
      proportionately related to what the management's business results are.

  4. I got burned by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I invested in it and got burned. That hurts since i only make $50,000 in IT in Silicon Valley. I guess lesson learned - don't invest in startups that you don't know.

    1. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought penny stocks and sold when they hit $15/share. You're not supposed to do the opposite.

    2. Re:I got burned by mcmonkey · · Score: 2

      What research did you do into Confido before you "invested"? The main people involved, what successful businesses have they run in the past? What in their background led you to believe they would provide a return in this case?

      And ICOs in general, I've heard plenty about how much the folks running these ICOs are pulling in. What's the history on the people on the other end? What sort of return have "investors" had in the past?

    3. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I presume that roughly none of the post was true, otherwise the (Score: 5, Funny) seems more than a little dark.

    4. Re:I got burned by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the tipoff was the "I make 50,000 in IT in Silicon valley" which is a bit of a meme around here...

    5. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention if you see that poster's name, you'll see they're behind about 1/10th of the ridiculous faggot multiple-account-spam that instantly thumbs itself to +5 within 2 minutes.

    6. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please shut the fuck up already.

    7. Re:I got burned by slew · · Score: 1

      I invested in it and got burned. That hurts since i only make $50,000 in IT in Silicon Valley. I guess lesson learned - don't invest in startups that you don't know.

      You learned the wrong lesson then...
      Clearly, you should have learned that the way to get rich in Silicon Valley is to start your own company and have others that you don't know invest in your startup...

    8. Re:I got burned by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Wrong lesson. What you should have learned is "don't invest money you can't afford to lose, period."

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    9. Re:I got burned by Holi · · Score: 1

      How about don't invest in cryptocoins when the founder has only a linkedin page as an online presence.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    10. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP is mocking creimer (aka, cdreimer), who has acted very self-important and "bigly" on Slashdot.

      He specifically boasted about making $50K in Silicon Valley. As if that doesn't force him to live in someone's glove compartment deep in the boonies.

    11. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never invest in an ICO right off the bat. Wait till the first dip to get in.

    12. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP is mocking creimer (aka, cdreimer), who has acted very self-important and "bigly" on Slashdot.

      He specifically boasted about making $50K in Silicon Valley. As if that doesn't force him to live in someone's glove compartment deep in the boonies.

      What ever happened to that guy? Did he finally get a raise to $51k or did he have to move to Portland and start sharing a tent under a bridge with that MichaelDavidCrawford over at SoylentNews?

    13. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~10%? Yeah that is probably spot on. The other posters are pretty easy to name.

      A particular one that almost never actually posts about tech, only gender issues, has been going on a multi-day passive-agressive tantrum since his sockpuppet mod points aren't enough to overcome the downmods like they used to.

      MightyMartian and rsilver, despite how bad they are for discussion around here, at least they do not partake in the sockpuppet lottery anymore. Kudos to them.

    14. Re:I got burned by jeremyp · · Score: 2

      No. If you can't afford to lose the money, do not invest in start ups at all. Start ups are inherently very risky - even when they are not scams. Most of the time, you will lose your money.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    15. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK. You make $50k/month working IT in the valley. You'll survive.

    16. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I invested in it and got burned. That hurts since i only make $50,000 in IT in Silicon Valley. I guess lesson learned - don't invest in startups that you don't know.

      Why are you putting effort into trolling a website full of vicious little Nazi autists whose developmental issues mean that they will literally spend their entire lives trolling themselves internally?

      Do you just want to be king of the fucking inadequates or something?

    17. Re:I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What research did you do into Confido before you "invested"?

      He took one look at the name and was instantly made confident of their reliability and trustworthiness. Just like Honest Ali's Used Cars!

    18. Re: I got burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish i had 50,000 a year job.
      Cant you just stick some money in bitcoin for a few months and youll have recouped your losses?

  5. Not learning? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People not learning that crypto currency is a frickin' scam. No sympathy.

    1. Re:Not learning? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Shocked, shocked I am!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Not learning? by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 0

      Considering Crypto has made HUNDREDS, if not thousands of millionaires, it's hardly a scam. Sorry you missed out. Now get ready to watch this thing explode to a 5 Trillion dollar marketcap cap in the next 5 years. You will be crying yourself to sleep for decades for missing the opportunity of your life... and why? Because you speak without knowing the facts or having done anymore than surface level research. Crypto has more Phd's working on it than Google, Facebook and Amazon combined.

      --
      No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    3. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering Crypto has made HUNDREDS, if not thousands of millionaires, it's hardly a scam.

      Name three of them.

      Bonus points: Millionaires in real money, not millionaires in how much they paid for it.

    4. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were in grad school, you'd know the higher the number of Phd's a project has the worse it'll be.

    5. Re:Not learning? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      People not learning that crypto currency is a frickin' scam. No sympathy.

      Email is also a scam, as are telephones.. and people! All scams, every one of them. If anyone ever scammed someone using something then that thing is a scam. No doubt.

    6. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Considering Crypto has made HUNDREDS, if not thousands of millionaires, it's hardly a scam.
      There are the scammers.
      There are the scammeds.

      The first ones ""make"" millions from the second ones.
      So you just confirmed it's a scam.

    7. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is this idiocy modded up?

    8. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering Crypto has made HUNDREDS, if not thousands of millionaires, it's hardly a scam.

      Where I am from, those millionaires are called charlatans.

    9. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the issue.

      Cryptocurrency can be a useful tool and still not be a sound investment.

      Cryptocurrency can be used to make a transaction, but the exchange rate doesn't the efficiency of that transfer at all. If you need to transfer USD 1000 to someone there is no technical benefit in the transfer being made over 1 bitcoin instead of over 10 bitcoins.

      It is not bitcoin as a technology that's a scam/pyramidscheme, it's bitcoin as an investment.

      Let's pretend that you are an American that use dollars. Suddenly, for no reason everyone started buying Euros, you know that nothing has happened to warrant an increase in Euro price, but since everyone is buying them the price is going up. Are you going to claim that Euros are suddenly a sound investment, just on the basis that they have increased in value in the last year?
         

    10. Re:Not learning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we got it, you're late to the pyramid and are trying to recruit more people so you can cash out at a profit.

  6. But... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 0

    This is how it's *SUPPOSED* to work, no?

  7. It's in the name! by santiago · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, Confido was a Confidence Game? The name even means "I trust" in several Romance languages...

    1. Re:It's in the name! by war4peace · · Score: 0

      Romance languages...

      Also known as languages of love.
      No wonder people got fucked.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. Oh no! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Ponzi scheme makes some people rich by taking money from "investors"
    More news at 11.

    1. Re:Oh no! by magarity · · Score: 2

      To qualify as a Ponzi scheme they would need to pay off at least one round of investors with capital from a second round.

    2. Re:Oh no! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Fine... Scam makes some people rich by taking money from "investors"

  9. Ha ha ha. by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The message was apparently written by Confido's founder, one Joost van Doorn, who seems to have no internet presence besides a now-removed LinkedIn profile."

    Founder of internet-based currency, has no internet presence to speak of. Yeah, "Joost van Doorn" doesn't exist.

    When people do so little due diligence or research, we can't really call it investing. People gave their money away. People can cry foul or whatever all they want. That money is gone.

    We're really getting into the territory where it is legitimate to ask, how did people so gullible acquire anything of value in the first place?

    1. Re: Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess; inheritance. Good thing the estate tax is going away. I need to polish up my sales pitch...

    2. Re:Ha ha ha. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Make no mistake, Mr. fake van Doorn is going to get caught. People that steal real money like this without connections and money behind them are doomed to get caught and go to jail. The SEC started the initial paperwork to start going after these ICO scammers and they don't' screw around, they ruin your life, send you to jail and then let the IRS have their way with you.

      In the end you've got nothing but a sore ass for thinking you can outwit the people with unlimited resources to find you and the money is always traceable unless you are rich enough and connected enough to bounce it off a dozen banks in unregulated jurisdictions to launder it.

    3. Re:Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if you are a capable individual nothing is setup in your name to begin with, and the money goes off-shore and becomes untraceable through other means. The person they "catch" is the person whose name everything was setup under, the fall guy, and not you. I mean after all if you are so capable of conning people into shit then why not start with conning some dumb fuck to be the CEO of your little scam?

    4. Re:Ha ha ha. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      He would go to jail based on what?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes yes, we know - she deserved to be raped because of of how she was dressed, am I right?
      I think we can all agree that people who are honest and trusting deserve no protection from fraud, just like people who don't triple bolt this windows and have 24h armed guards are begging to be robbed.

    6. Re: Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurt feelings and MAGA.

    7. Re:Ha ha ha. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      We're really getting into the territory where it is legitimate to ask, how did people so gullible acquire anything of value in the first place?

      They sucker in a few that are always looking to make lots of fast money through professional appearances and fancy business plans. Then you make those people pimp the system to their friends, that's what sells most people. A bunch of my friends got ripped off in some MLM scam some years back, it'd entered my clique of friends through one person who then became two, those two convinced a third and... the more friends are in on it, the harder it gets to say you're all wrong. Hell, even afterwards some simply tried to say it was just a risk investment and they lost.

      Humans are terrible at backing out of a bad idea when they've first committed to it, try watching newbies in poker that fall in love with their hand. Not betting a poor hand is easy. Betting a good hand that turns bad then fold, that's hard. It's why some projects run into ridiculous overruns, it's always 10-20% more to finish and those add up to double or triple the initial budget. It's how the Nigerian prince scams work, as long as people feel there's the small chance that those millions of dollars are right around the corner or over the next hilltop they'll put in a few more dollars and then a few more and then even more.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grand theft I imagine. It was what, 350k? That's surely enough to be considered grand theft. Also he committed fraud.

    9. Re: Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fraud? All I see are idiots who invested and lost. It happens every day.

    10. Re:Ha ha ha. by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Who says he/she/it has no connections and money behind them?

    11. Re: Ha ha ha. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Asking people to invest money for a new business and then pocketing it is fraud. Specifically, it is embezzlement.

      No question about it.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    12. Re:Ha ha ha. by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      They didn't steal enough to stay out of jail, yup. Go big - Corzine for example - or go to jail.
      Only relatively small potatoes get busted. You gotta get billions at least to buy continued freedom.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    13. Re:Ha ha ha. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, "Joost van Doorn" doesn't exist.

      I agree. It's probably a made-up name.

      But if anyone wants to investigate, that name sounds Dutch or white South African. And if you're going to make up a name, you might as well pick one that would already fit your family history.

    14. Re:Ha ha ha. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      make no mistake, less than 15 percent of fraudsters get caught.

    15. Re: Ha ha ha. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      You would be amazed how not true your statement is. You have to prove criminal intent; collusion, signing moronic agreements, and waste (triple points for that waste benefiting a subsidiary you own) are perfectly legal ways to take investor money and run a company into the ground. Good luck suing in court, because even if you somehow win, and even if that amount is more than your legal fees, you still have to somehow get that judgement paid, and as a pleeb your odds of getting paid are zero.

    16. Re: Ha ha ha. by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Good luck suing in court, because even if you somehow win, and even if that amount is more than your legal fees, you still have to somehow get that judgement paid, and as a pleeb your odds of getting paid are zero.

      Nobody is getting the money, sure, but this is still a crime that the government can prosecute and send the guy to jail.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    17. Re: Ha ha ha. by jezwel · · Score: 1

      Nobody is getting the money, sure, but this is still a crime that the government can prosecute and send the guy to jail.

      How 'bout: the contract that is causing issues is the one where the now-missing founder was paid a salary of $375,000+ per quarter and the company has ran out of money and is being sued by him as it owes him backpay.
      No crimes there.

    18. Re:Ha ha ha. by Computershack · · Score: 2

      Make no mistake, Mr. fake van Doorn is going to get caught. People that steal real money like this without connections and money behind them are doomed to get caught and go to jail. The SEC started the initial paperwork to start going after these ICO scammers and they don't' screw around, they ruin your life, send you to jail and then let the IRS have their way with you.

      That is assuming he is in the USA. If he isn't then the SEC and IRS can stamp their feet all they want and they can't do a damned thing about it.

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    19. Re: Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is a crime, when you float a company be it for cash, shares, imaginary coins or fluffy alien toys you immediately have a fiduciary responsibility to the investors to disclose relevant information. he would be charged with both fraud and various other crimes as well as trading while insolvent, and if he hasn't traded then it is simply straight up fraud.

    20. Re:Ha ha ha. by houghi · · Score: 1

      It is a standard Dutch name. Both the "Joost" part as the "van Doorn" part. So I would assume that it is somebody in The Netherlands who used it to make a fake name or at least knowledge of The Netherlands.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    21. Re: Ha ha ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think if someone was going to knowingly take this kind of money, they would also be sitting on the beach in a country with no extradition treaties too. If they did this from a "regular" country then they are pretty stupid.

    22. Re: Ha ha ha. by tomtomtom · · Score: 1

      Taking investors' money and squandering it by trying to do what you promised but failing badly is one thing (although even that can rise to the level of criminal liability in some instances e.g. trading whilst insolvent, insider trading or Securities Act/Sarbanes-Oxley type stuff).

      But deliberately pocketing the money and running (which is what GP suggested)? That's plain old fraud, been going on for centuries and it gets prosecuted successfully every week.

    23. Re: Ha ha ha. by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Hahahahaha. You live in a fantasy world. Your chances of getting even a civil judgement for breaking "fiduciary responsibility" are zero. I've even been involved in a case where a startup signed a moronic agreement incurring millions in obligations to a contract manufacturer, and lied about this debt during an investment round in the official finnancial disclosure. When the company went belly up two years later, due to this debt, investors sued over this. However, the special prosecutor appointed by the company said a tiny text only document, explaining these secret details, would have been made available to any investors who actually put in money that round and asked for it(in reality this was typed up after the fact). This and a dozen more shady dealings were completely exonerated. 80k in, with the full case looking like a 1 million dollar legal bill for a full class action suit, odds of winning very low, and with no actual money being obtainable even with a win, and with criminal charges being a farce that would never happen because courts are pro corruption, it was dropped and the 3M investment among those suing was just written off. I should have had a clue when in a city of several million people it was nearly impossible to find a law firm because literally the first 20 all had conflicts with these rich asshats. When you have money and connections you can break all the laws you want and it's nearly a zero chance of any, even minor, consequences.

  10. But the good news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The founders of the PerpetualMotionem and FasterThanLighteum coin projects, both based on highly sophisticated mathematics, are still taking investments.

  11. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And better pray the power company doesn't tip off the police about your "grow operation"

  12. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Climate change is real, the earth is heating up and dumbfucks sending a nuclear reactor worth of power for e-Monopoly money are the cause.

  13. Well, they were buying "ether"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Confido sold people bespoke digital tokens that represent their investment in exchange for ether..."

    It sounds like the investors got exactly what they paid for.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Blockchain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if I put a sign that says "Blockchain" on my lawn, will idiots then come and give me free money?

  16. Madoff, anyone? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    The people who scammed by Madoff got scammed because they were greedy. Same deal here.

    1. Re:Madoff, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a rather poor analogy. Bernard Madoff got away with it for as long as he did because he was a titan of the industry. Bernie Madoff, founder of the Nasdaq. People who knew better cut corners on their due diligence because, hey, it was Bernard Madoff. "Joost van Doorn" may have got away with it because the stakes are lower.

    2. Re:Madoff, anyone? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      He got away with it because investors thought he was 'their criminal'. They all assumed he was trading on insider information. They all knew he was crooked, just not in what way.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confido tokens had a market cap of $10 million last week, before the company disappeared, but now the tokens are worthless.

    Just like Beany Babies, Pokemon Cards, and Zimbabwe currency.

    1. Re:Been there, done that. by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

      Except this "fad" has been up and running for 9 years and has hundreds of bluechip companies (IBM, Intel, HP, Microsoft, Cisco, and top 100 banks globally) hiring and training entire departments on the technology. Ya you will be the late majority at best. Enjoy buying Bitcoin at $100,000 per unit.

      --
      No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    2. Re: Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are delusional as hell. The only person in this thread sticking up for his scam.

      All those people you mentioned, are investing in the BLOcKCHAIN. They aren't investing in Bitcoin you dolt. No one is going to buy Bitcoin to purchase stuff. No one. Why would they? It makes 0 sense to use bitcoins unless you are 1) selling drugs 2) ransomware 3) criminals

    3. Re:Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this "fad" has been up and running for 9 years and has hundreds of bluechip companies (IBM, Intel, HP, Microsoft, Cisco, and top 100 banks globally) hiring and training entire departments on the technology. Ya you will be the late majority at best. Enjoy buying Bitcoin at $100,000 per unit.

      What I'm taking from your comment is that you also see yourself as having been late to the party, and seem to be extremely bitter about it. Are you aware of how strongly that's coming across?

      Also the phrase "Enjoy buying Bitcoin at $100,000 per unit" suggests that you have an understanding of economics and human behaviour which would put you right in the target demographic for the kind of scams we're discussing here.

  19. What else is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some new eCoin pops up and steals hundreds of thousands/millions of dollars. Back in 2012 this was common business and the people that fell for it were fucking idiots.

    In 5 years have we learned NOTHING? You people are morons!

  20. The lessons... by martinX · · Score: 1

    This is beyond gambling, beyond speculation. This is into "wishing well" territory.

    For some it may be a good lesson cheaply purchased. Some... not so cheaply.

    Maybe they should take a look at something like this.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  21. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by originalGMC · · Score: 2

    Climate change is real, the earth is heating up and dumbfucks sending a nuclear reactor worth of power for e-Monopoly money are the cause.

    I seriously lol'd at this. Just imagine a BTC farm being powered by a coal fired power plant ..... hah! They are the problem!
    Seriously though, if you spend $15000 on a mining rig, how much time / energy to mine 3 btc? Does the energy bill compare against running a heater to warm your house, as opposed to using the mining rig as the heater? Lastly, can I get one or two of your 1080ti cards you're wasting on monopoly money to run my games?

  22. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by magarity · · Score: 2

    To heck with bitcoins; that rig will get me some serious SETI@Home points!

  23. But Cryptocoins are better than the stock market! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unregulated market for the $374K win! Proof that companies can regulate themselves and if wall street regulations weren't so burdensome wall street companies could score like Confido!

  24. Re:What did you expect with a name like that? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 5, Funny

    They bought ether and then complain when it disappeared into thin air!

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. And so was born the new phrase... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 0

    NSFYL... Not Sorry For Your Loss.

  27. Re:What did you expect with a name like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another name... Micro and Soft and Windows.

  28. "Invested"? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yeah, "invested". In quotes.

    That's a nice word for it.

  29. $374,000 is more than enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to disappear with and live fairly decently in much of South America, where, there is very little reciprocal laws governing extradition. Chile, Argentina, Uruguay are all nice places, with Chile being the best overall. Even modern Colombia is a nice place to live (have done it). These places are not quite Europe or America, but they all have fast internet, ultra-cheap rents, and access to 99% of the amenities one could want.

  30. Play stupid games; win stupid prizes. by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    There's inherent risk in everything. Investing means you are banking your money on making money off the back of someone else. Can't bitch too hard when it goes wrong since "that's just business". I still don't condone it, though.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  31. Fixed that for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And investors are crying foul."
    And speculators are crying foul.

  32. Karma strikes again by AndyKron · · Score: 0

    HA HA!

  33. Re:What did you expect with a name like that? by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Doorn, not Doom.
    DOORN.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  34. It disapeared into..... by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 0

    The Eather

  35. Well thats it, I'm convinced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely some helpful moderator can tell me where to send all my monies to get in on this miraculous bitcoin gravytrain?

  36. Re: He's not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then who the hell is the old guy on the other side of the glory hole??

    Oh... JIMMY Buffet he says.

  37. "ICO"s explained in one picture by ffkom · · Score: 1
  38. Re:I bet I know the founder's religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, same as *your mother*

  39. Instructables! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone write an cryptocurrency instructable on how to scam preppers and libertarians?

    Oh wait, I guess I just need a "Send cash here for coinzzzz" static page with a cayman address.

    Fuckin chuckleheads. They deserve to be bilked.

    1. Re:Instructables! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...how to scam preppers and libertarians?"

      This is actually surprisingly easy. Get two Libertarians arguing about which is the purer, and then lock them in a closet. When they emerge with two black eyes and three opinions, they will find you long gone, along with all the pot they had stashed in their rucksacks.
      Don't bother with the Preppers. They only toke ragweed, and it's probably booby-trapped anyway.

  40. Put your money into something safe. by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    Put your money into something safe, like manned steam rocketry.

  41. Joke is funny but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not "languages of love", they're Roman-ce languages because the language family grew from ancient Roman language.
    (By coincidence, French is both a Romance language and called "the language of love" by some.)

    1. Re:Joke is funny but... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Dude. I know. I'm Romanian :)
      It was a joke.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  42. Take the money and run by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    We know a startup management technique is "take the money and run", but all that mess for just 374,000 USD? Real business leaders do not risk jail for so little money.

    1. Re: Take the money and run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless Mr. Business Leader was running this entire scam from his hut in the middle of Peru where he can have an entire breakfast spread for 88cents a day.

  43. Re:But Cryptocoins are better than the stock marke by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

    Oh no in a $230 BILLION dollar market we find $374K of fraud... let me do the math on that... oh right... 0.00016%. In other words one thousand of one percent of Crypto is a scam. Ok let's multiply that by 10 just cuz there have been a few other scams. One one hundred of 1% is a scam. Hmmm... sounds a bit better than WallStreet no?

    I'll take my chances with Crypto than JP Morgan, Goldman and other FlashBoys scaming all your manipulated stock market. See you when Crypto hits $5 Trillion.

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
  44. Doom by mattr · · Score: 1

    Does Joost have a PhD? I would think twice before giving money to a shady character named Doom, but that's just me.

  45. ...obligatory "annnnnnd its gone" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    POOF

  46. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Compared to the millions of fuckers who use their PS4 and XBox One to stream Netflix, crypto-mining is nothing but a little blip on the radar.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  47. Joost van Doorn by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Are we sure it's his name? Could be a typo, maybe his name is Joost van Doom .

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  48. Con fido by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    They had 'confidence game' right in their name folks.

    Yes, but to be fair it does sound like they were aiming to con dogs rather than humans.

  49. Re: DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer affiliate spam.

  50. Re: What did you expect with a name like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe Worf would scam people like this. Such an honerable Klingon.

    Oh we aren't talking about Michael Dorn? My bad

  51. Regulated ICOs to the rescue by quax · · Score: 1

    There's actually a first regulator approved ICO underway in North America right now, in Ontario.

    I.e. the same regulatory body that oversees the largest Canadian stock exchange approved this ICO.

    The goal is to create a platform that allows further ICOs with oversight and investor protection.

    This means on this kind of platform a company couldn't just vanish and run away with the funds. (At least not any more than any publicly traded company can).

    DISCLAIMER: I don't work for TokenFunder.com, but contemplate to invest.

  52. For carrying on an undertaking of great advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentlemen of Slashdot, I present to you now the opportunity of investment in a truly unique ICO.

    It is for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage; but nobody to know what it is.

    I assure any investors that their residue will be returned with a 200% per cent bounty within the year!

    Because of incredible demand, a 10% deposit to reserve this opportunity is required.

  53. No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch the blockchain, it's all in the public domain. ::-)

    Hey you didn't want the gov medling with the flow of money, so now don't come crying to mommy. There is no such thing as fraud in crypto currency world, there is only free flow of money, that's what you wanted, that's what you got. Stop whining.

  54. It was only a bespoke token by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness that it was only a bespoke digital token and not an artisinal token.

  55. Freedom... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    ...from regulation and accountability. Yes, that's how cryptocurrencies are supposed to work and why they're so popular with drug dealers, human traffickers, and the like. This is just the beginning; wait until Goldman Sachs comes up with its version of a cryptocurrency ponzi scheme. The tax payer will have to foot the bill for that one.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  56. Re:But Cryptocoins are better than the stock marke by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Going to call bullshit... a 230 billion dollar market is one that has that value in a single year.

  57. ICOs are scams by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    In the BTC community, we regard anyone who buys into ICOs as complete and utter morons.

    1. Re:ICOs are scams by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      In the internet community, we regard anyone who buys into BTC complete and utter morons. But hey, it's your money. You can buy all the tulip bulbs you want.

      --
      ~X~
    2. Re:ICOs are scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I did years ago and my couple hundred is now $90K. I'm such a fool! Please tell me how I can become more like you.

    3. Re:ICOs are scams by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ah, you got out of tulip bulbs before the bubble burst. Assuming, of course, that you have cashed out and have an actual $90K rather than BTC that might possibly be worth $90K that you're going to hold on to.

      Ponzi schemes can be rewarding investments if you get in on the ground floor.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  58. at least with paper currency you need a printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Risk/Reward...lol...what do people expect...there's like 600 cryptocurrencies.

  59. Re:But Cryptocoins are better than the stock marke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you were typing that, it jumped to $239 Billion...

    https://coinmarketcap.com/

    By the time we're done with the 2017 year, it will probably be over $250 Billion.

  60. To the naysayers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is good for Ethereum.

  61. STAN BUCKS by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 1

    It's Money!

  62. P. T. Barnum by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    There's a sucker burn every minute.

  63. How to make $374,000 without really trying! by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    How to make $374,000 without really trying!

    1. Set up imaginary thing with alleged value.
    2. Find greedy dolts with more money than sense.
    3. ...
    4. Profit!

    I guess 3 was "Shut down all your social media stuff, go dark, disappear with money citing legal problems with a contract," the modern equivalent of 'the dog ate my homework' in today's phony world.

    I'm sure glad I had no money invested in this crypto-pyramid-scheme.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  64. Re:But Cryptocoins are better than the stock marke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds a bit better than WallStreet no?

    You know who else had a better ROI than Wall Street? Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.

  65. Hang Them High by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Crime has so many ways of costing us all money that it is vital that these people are caught and serve life ruining sentences. As a simple example riding bicycles produces all kinds of benefits for all of us. It frees up parking spaces. It reduces pollution. It improves the health of the riders and thus keeps medical expenses down for the community. So maybe you've got a cheap bike that gets swiped. How harsh should the sentencing be? Keep in mind that you are forced to carry keys, purchase cables and locks and that many people do not use bicycles due to the locking and unlocking rituals that get so very frustrating. And by the way more murders occur during bicycle thefts than in bank robberies. So would it be unreasonable to put a first offender in prison for 15 or 20 years? Isn't that just a simple message that if you do wrong society may really crush you? When I was a youth any arrest for use or possession of any illegal drug was pretty much a life ender. The consequence was that in the suburbs there was almost no drug use at all among school kids. The state stepped away from radical punishments and a flood of drug related issues among kids quickly appeared. In Florida we had a reform school in Marianna Florida that tortured, sexually violated and often murdered teen inmates. They are still digging up the bodies of these missing youth who the authorities simply claimed that they escaped and vanished. Teens would actually say they didn't want to go to Marianna when others asked them to get involved in some sort of crimes. I am aware that rabid justice is sort of a sick idea but the catch is that it worked.

  66. Re:But Cryptocoins are better than the stock marke by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Market cap and market are two different things, market cap is the value of all outstanding shares, a market of $X needs to turn over $X a year. Further, since bitcoin is supposedly a currency market cap is not the correct term either,

  67. CONfido?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the money some greedy people put into this CON vanished "in the ether"... LOL

  68. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

    Does the energy bill compare against running a heater to warm your house, as opposed to using the mining rig as the heater?

    Resistive heating (e.g. a bitcoin miner) gives ~1W of heat per 1W of electricity. A heat pump gives ~3W of heat per 1W of electricity.

    Burning fuel locally for heat is much more efficient than burning it in a remote power plant, converting the heat to electricity, then transporting the electricity and converting it back to heat.

  69. Re:DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe. It depends on the transport costs: What does it cost to transport the fuel to the remote power plant vs. transporting it to your home (and the homes of 1000 others)?

    One large shipment to one location is a lot more efficient than 1000 small shipments to 1000 different locations. You'd have to do some calculations to figure out the tipping point where electricity transmission costs are less than the difference between fuel shipment costs, though.

    FWIW, my intuition suggests that transmission costs still make the electric route less efficient overall - but that kind of depends on the tanker trucks/pipelines/power lines.

  70. Well gee... by ShamblerBishop · · Score: 1

    Who would have guessed? I'm shocked - shocked I tell you! - that's put me right off my Weetabix, what ever will I do...all those poor investors, who would ever have thought an innocent cryptocurrency could do something like this? That it might be...*shock*...a f.f.f...fraud? *puts arm to head and feints like a girl*

    Oh the humanity! I hear Bob Geldof will do a concert for the victims :( :/ (god it's pointless, there isn't even a sad smiley that's sad enough for things like this...)

  71. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First world problems