Slashdot Mirror


The Lower Your Social Class, the 'Wiser' You Are, Suggests New Study (sciencemag.org)

Wisdom -- the ability to take the perspectives of others into account and aim for compromise -- comes much more naturally to those who grow up poor or working class, according to a new study by social psychologist Igor Grossman at the University of Waterloo in Canada and his colleagues. Science Magazine reports: To conduct the study, Grossmann and his graduate student Justin Brienza embarked on a two-part experiment. First, they asked 2145 people throughout the United States to take an online survey. Participants were asked to remember a recent conflict they had with someone, such as an argument with a spouse or a fight with a friend. They then answered 20 questions applicable to that or any conflict, including: "Did you ever consider a third-party perspective?" "How much did you try to understand the other person's viewpoint?" and "Did you consider that you might be wrong?" Grossmann and Brienza crunched the data and assigned the participants both a "wise reasoning" score based on the conflict answers and a "social class" score, then plotted the two scores against one another. They found that people with the lowest social class scores -- those with less income, less education, and more worries about money -- scored about twice as high on the wise reasoning scale as those in the highest social class. The income and education levels ranged from working class to upper middle class; neither the very wealthy nor the very poor were well represented in the study.

In the second part of the experiment, the duo recruited 200 people in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, to take a standard IQ test and read three letters to the Dear Abby advice column. One letter, for example, asked about choosing sides in an argument between mutual friends. Each participant then discussed with an interviewer how they thought the situations outlined in the letters would play out. A panel of judges scored their responses according to various measures of wise reasoning. In the example above, thinking about how an outsider might view the conflict would earn points toward wisdom, whereas relying only on one's own perspective would not. As with the first part of the experiment, those in lower social classes consistently had higher wise-reasoning scores than those in higher social classes, the researchers reported today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. IQ scores, however, weren't associated one way or another with wise reasoning.

33 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Easy peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Poor people are not spoiled rotten, nor are they accustomed to be able to make every problem "go away" by application of money. This gives them a whole lot more experience dealing with problems that involves having to deal with things and situations where you just can't in various ways brute force your way.

    Also, see "Cake, why don't they eat".

    1. Re:Easy peasy by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basically, compromise is a survival skill for anyone without the strength (today, financial strength) to beat everyone else up until they do what you tell them to do.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Easy peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why was this modded down?

      That's ***exactly*** what this inarticulate woman said, and was a response to the GP ---

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio

    3. Re:Easy peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, why don't you apply for social assistance benefits (or whatever the local equavalent it is called in your country) while you're working and paying tax and see what happens. Taxpayer funded gifts tend to be available only to those that are not employed or have a low income, not to those who toiled to earn diplomas and degrees and worked hard to advance their careers.

    4. Re:Easy peasy by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might have something to do with the fact that the Lifeline phone program (which the woman called "Obama phone") was started under Ronald Reagan and expanded to mobile phones under George W. Bush. It was already a done deal before Obama became President.

  2. Is this supposed to be some kind of consolation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By virtue of having been born on the wrong side of the tracks, I'm pretty much screwed. Stuck on a low level job I hate but hope it's still there next year. My Christmas presents are a pile of bills to pay. My best years have come and gone. I'd rather be a rich fool than a wise pauper.

  3. Re:Another "great" article by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are excluding the possibility that many successful people succeed because of their lack of empathy, not despite it.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  4. That's wisdom? by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's an important skill, and obviously part of what we call wisdom, but I don't think it's the sine qua non.

    I can offer an SSI benefit letter as supporting credentials.

  5. Not wisdom by petes_PoV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wisdom -- the ability to take the perspectives of others into account

    What the author describes could be many things: diplomacy, empathy, humility even. But it is not wisdom. Though I can understand that people with less money (though that has little to do with "class" or entitlement - excpet possibly in the USA) will be forced to become more skilled in the art of compromise.

    Wisdom, as we all know, is not putting tomatoes in a fruit salad.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Not wisdom by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      white working class went and voted for Donald Trump

      Despite the prevailing wisdom that its poor white hicks that vote for Republicans, the evidence is actually not like that. There's a lot of folks, small business owners, managers and the likes.

      I'm going to get my head bit off this, but hear me out. One of Karl Marx's best observations is that people are basically self-interested. That isnt unique to him, most economists prior and after agreeing with him on that. What his big insight is, however, is that people form ideologies to justify or self explain their relationship to capital, or more loosely, wealth. Rich people are attracted to ideologies like Libertarianism or neo-conservatism. Poorer folks are more likely to be attracted to more socialist or even communist in extreme cases, ideologies. Conservatism and its spiral eyed crazy distant-cousin Fascism are the ideologies of the middle class. Those who think they are better than the poor folk, dont want the poor folk costing them tax, but still ultimately are just working for the man themselves. You dont have to agree with marxism, to see he made a pretty good observation there.

      Racism , sociologists argue, formed as a sort of pact between the white working class and the ruling caste in society. We'll give you better pay, and we wont give any of your jobs to those black folks, if you promise not to do anything buck crazy like joining the Commies or voting out the rich guys. It provided a way to essentially tame that self-interested streak in the working class by giving them something to be resentful of that isnt their fat rich bosses. Now none of this is some grand conspiracy. Its an emergent phenomena of millions and millions of people acrting on what they believe is their own self interest.

      Trump though. I half suspect the 50% of the population where having a bit of a granddad moment with that one

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:Not wisdom by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And then the white working class went and voted for Donald Trump on a promise to disenfranchise anybody who isn't white, crack down on black people complaining that the police shoots them for no reason, build a wall on the Mexican border, deport people by the millions and rubber stamp Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestinians without any attempt to put themselves in the place of the people being affected by these crackdowns. I'm failing to see the empathy and the willingness to compromise here.

      Wow you really are delusional aren't you? Can you point to where Trump promised to disenfranchise anyone who isn't white? Right. Didn't think so. But turning around and having voter ID laws isn't disenfranchisement, you of course realize that every western country BUT the US has voter ID laws. Can't remember where he is cracking down on "poor blackies" for getting shot. Remember how Obama and his administration went out of his way to race bait, go after police for doing their jobs and so on? Notice how crime has started spiking because of what the previous government did? Bet you were fine with all those actions. Building the wall is a good idea, they work and work well. Ask eastern european countries how well they're working. There are millions of illegals in the US so deporting them? That'd be a good start too. Of course in your racism, you probably think that when people say "deport illegals" they just mean mexicans. No they're talking about all illegals. They want to be there, do it legally, just like everyone else. Funny how you're not protesting Mexico's border wall, or their abysmal treatment of blacks. Or the systemic abuses against people who illegally enter mexico. Nope, the US has to simply let everyone in!

      Rubber stamping ethnic cleansing? Really? So you start out delusional then go right into batshit crazy huh? Which is why all those palestinian groups have things like "there can be no peace with the jews" "they must be driven into the sea" "there can be no peace with the jewish state" "it's the duty of xyz to murder the jews" and on and on and on. Most peaceful, full of compromise, really want to get along with the jews. It almost reminds me of the old saying: "The only peace you'll know is the peace of the grave." Funny how Saudi Arabia is suddenly becoming a staunch ally of Israel though isn't it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  6. Or in other words... by fafalone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The higher your class, the less the ability to compromise is developed after a lifetime of getting whatever you want because you have money. Seems about right.

    1. Re:Or in other words... by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, and too many folks who attain the highest social strata have anyone left around them to keep them grounded in reality. Not to single out the President because it affects many persons of privilege, but one Of President Trump's great weaknesses is an inability to accept criticism without perceiving it as a personal slight.

      Some advantages of being born poor?:

      You learn how to fix things other than by writing a check.

      All your well-being is less likely to be tied up in one commodity (money)... many suicides during the Wall Street crash of 1929.

      The greater the struggle of any life form, the hardier the stock.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  7. Re:Is this supposed to be some kind of consolation by RobinBermanseder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand the sentiment, but are you sure about that?
    Should my final report card, at the end of my life, be a record of my accumulated assets, or an archive of my virtues, achievements and reputation?
    Which of these will touch my descendants?
    Be careful what you wish for..
    - A friend

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:Another "great" article by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Seeing the view and perspective of other people" != "Empathy"
    Psychopath are often very good as seeing the view and perspective of other people... and how to abuse that knowledge for personal gain.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  10. Assets stay multi gen, virtue is gone next gen by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would rather leave a pile of assets to my next gen, than a pile of virtue which will count for NOTHING in the grand scheme of things. Sure , don't leave a negative legacy behind you i.o.w. don't be a murderer, or a rapist, or a scammer, etc.... But virtue left to your kid/grand kid ? Pah. That sure as hell will warm their heart when the bill comes to be paid, or will help them scale social ladder.... not.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  11. That's not wisdom by johannesg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wisdom is "the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgement; the quality of being wise." It has nothing to do with being able to understand someone else's perspective, nor does it have anything to do with class.

    I have a serious problem with this kind of article redefining what words mean, and then ascribing positive traits to lower-class people and negative traits to upper-class people. It's the same story as with "emotional intelligence": that was just a crutch to allow less intelligent people to feel good about themselves and to let them look down on smarter people, because those are _obviously_ not emotionally intelligent as well.

    And this is the same: being poor does not make you wise. I've seen poor people make horrendously unwise decisions, and in some cases they are poor because of that.

  12. Same With Monkeys by jblues · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Group living in all species is dependent on tolerance of other group members. In crab-eating macaques, successful social group living maintains postconflict resolution must occur. Usually, less dominant individuals lose to a higher-ranking individual when conflict arises. After the conflict has taken place, lower-ranking individuals tend to fear the winner of the conflict to a greater degree. In one study, this was seen by the ability to drink water together. Postconflict observations showed a staggered time between when the dominant individual begins to drink and the subordinate. Long-term studies reveal the gap in drinking time closes as the conflict moves further into the past. -- Long-tailed Macaques

    tldr; All individuals depend on the group, higher ranking individuals, whose position in the group is more secure, can afford to be assholes.

    --
    If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
  13. Re:Another "great" article by coastwalker · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Moneylenders in the temple say screw the libtard poor, I didn't get where I am today by not stepping on the faces of the cattle I despise so much. Evolution says the strongest survive and I am an animal, so death to the poor! Of course everyone hates me for my arrogance and arguably I am nothing to do with human civilisation but civilisation is for losers. Happy Christmas everyone!

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  14. Silly definition of wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wisdom is compromise?

    The study is absurd at the outset because they have a ridiculous definition of wisdom.

    1. Re: Silly definition of wisdom by PoopJuggler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not the only wisdom, but it's a wisdom.

    2. Re:Silly definition of wisdom by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The study is absurd at the outset because they have a ridiculous definition of wisdom.

      The methodology is silly as well. Rather than doing "surveys", they should have looked at hard data: Less educated and less affluent people have much higher rates of divorce and domestic violence. So it is unlikely that they are "better at compromising".

      People with college degrees are half as likely to divorce as those without.

    3. Re: Silly definition of wisdom by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

      One day, a group of poor researchers wanted to define wisdom....

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Silly definition of wisdom by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Less educated and less affluent people have much higher rates of divorce and domestic violence. So it is unlikely that they are "better at compromising".

      But that's a scenario that's fraught with complications, isn't it? The character of compromises demanded from poor people differs from the kinds of compromises people with plenty of resources face. It's not about where to take vacation this year, it's food or medical care and which bills you can risk going past due on.

      I grew up in a quite poor neighborhood, and achieved middle class status through education. My family was better off than most, and I was fortunate enough to win a scholarship to a prestigious engineering school. So I know from personal experience the difference between how poor people live and how middle class people live. My wife, my kids, most of the people I know these days have no idea. They don't know any families where the kids don't have beds to sleep in.

      Let me tell you another thing about poor people you probably don't know. For the most part they work. Often a hell of a lot, although these days many of the jobs aren't 9-to-5. You've got to get work where and when you can, and some employers are canny about using computerized scheduling to keep employees below thresholds where mandated benefits kick in.

      One in four working class people spend 50% or more on their income on rent. This means you really need two incomes, and low status jobs don't come with perqs like mental health days. So no flexible schedules or after-school programs for your kids; you give them a key and hope for the best.

      It's stressful to deal with all that, and that stress breaks up families.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  15. Re:Another "great" article by rjnagle · · Score: 4, Informative

    In a recent feature on This American Life, Betsy DeVos was depicted as being a very compassionate and generous person (she helped individual students to get private schooling), but lacking empathy (she didn't understand the multiple issues with public schools and the diverse population and the regulatory frameworks for the public school system in the US. Also, she didn't appreciate the need for scalable solutions). MORE: https://www.thisamericanlife.o...

    --
    Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
  16. Re:My rich uncle died by Beeftopia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the money my cousin got went up his nose and for lawyers to get him out of trouble.

    He's broke now.

    He's not an outlier. I see this time and time again, children of financially successful people get fucked up. Look at all the entertainment stars' kids who end up in rehab.

    It's a well-known phenomenon known as "Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in 3 generations."

    "THE Chinese have a saying, “Fu bu guo san dai,” or “Wealth never survives three generations.” America has its own version of this saying: “From shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations.” As with most old proverbs, there is a grain of truth to this—and the new rich are searching for ways to avoid history's curse." -- The Economist (likely paywalled)

  17. Re:That's not wisdom by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't it strange how, ever since Trump was elected, bigoted classism is now socially acceptable? Modded up to +5. Leftists insist that poor whites who voted for Trump are racist and sexist. The classist bigotry of the Left, which would have been unthinkable for leftists back in the 1930s, is never acknowledged. Moreover, although leftists insist we ought not to stereotype people, leftists are doing it constantly with Trump voters.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  18. Voter ID: Half an answer by lenski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a poll worker ("volunteer": they paid us, about 1/10 of a day's pay for an 18-hour day), I totally agree with the idea of consistent and reliable ID methods.

    So you are half right. But it's the thin and weak half.

    Those of us who were born into families with the basic resources to give us a good start were able to spend the effort to set up drivers licenses (the typical ID) which are trivial to renew once set up. To us, it does not appear to be a very high bar.

    "Conservatives" are careful to avoid, and have largely successfully avoided an important point: There are many people who would otherwise be fully capable were born to families so far down that they could not get that start. And from that position, they often do not have the resources to get the legal documents that get the ball rolling.

    Countries with good quality voter ID laws/practices do not erect the legal impediments to getting that initial start, and their citizens do not experience the disenfranchisement that we see in too many places in the U.S.

  19. Re:Another "great" article by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Moneylenders in the temple say screw the libtard poor

    They were money CHANGERS, not money lenders.

    The story of JC driving the "money lenders" from the temple is TOTALLY MISUNDERSTOOD by most people, and even many theologists. The lesson they take away is that JC wanted to "keep the temple holy", but the actual point was the exact opposite. At the time, mainstream Judaism was obsessed with "purity" rituals, and people would change their soiled and worn money for clean and polished money (paying a premium to do so) so they could make an offering with "clean" money. But JC was objecting to the "purity" rather than the "commerce", and was expressing the Essene philosophy of getting back to basics, and doing away with purity and ritual. He wanted to make the temple more accessible to the common people.

  20. Re:Another "great" article by zifn4b · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are excluding the possibility that many successful people succeed because of their lack of empathy, not despite it.

    Get off your moral high horse. It's not that they don't have empathy, it's that they don't allow their decision making process to be exclusively dominated by it. People who make decisions exclusively based on emotions do not fare as well as those who also mix in rational thinking. Rational thinking coupled with extensive knowledge and experience can do remarkable things that emotions alone cannot.

    We still live in a world of economic scarcity unfortunately and as such you must make decisions according to that. When we arrive at a utopia, which I sincerely hope we do, it will fundamentally alter the decision making and it will be rational to behave the way you ideally think we should. We are not your enemy.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  21. Re:Another "great" article by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not quite right. As I understand it, they were required to pay in the coinage accepted by the temple, which meant they had to give gifts in Jewish currency, not Roman or Greek currency. It had nothing to do with making the money pure, but rather with converting it to a form that the church would accept. And because they were far from home and did not have the advantage of knowing where to find good conversion rates, those money changers cheated them massively.

    So it was, indeed, about making the temple pure from those who would prey upon the naïveté of foreigners, while at the same time sending their soldiers to attack other nations for theft and barbarity. The hypocrisy was what Jesus wanted to cleanse from the temple, along with the unethical commerce.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  22. This may have merit by DaMattster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At my college, I became friendly with one of the security guards after he saved my life. He found me unconscious and laying on the ground. Turned out I had a life threatening infection and never knew. Well, we were talking one day and I had it out with my dad. I swore I would never make the same mistakes with my child when I have one. I swore that I would be a better father. Officer Joe looked me in the eye and said, "You won't make the same mistakes. You're right about that. You'll make all new ones. Have gratitude, not hate in your heart." 20 years later, after health issues, personal and professional failure, and heart ache, I'm now working as a security guard. I decided to become a security guard after thinking of Officer Joe. It's a hand to mouth existence but I've never felt more wealthy and freer. It took me 20 years of lost time that I won't ever get back, but I learned a lesson most never learn in their life times.