Slashdot Mirror


Roombas Will Soon Build a Wi-Fi Coverage Map While They Clean (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: The feature is arriving later this month on the iRobot app, making it possible for WiFi-enabled Roombas to create a map of indoor signals. The map exists alongside the existing Clean Map feature, letting users toggle between the two, like they would, say, satellite and standard imagery in Google Maps. The maps themselves won't go into too much detail -- no upload and download speeds like you see on many mobile speed test apps. Instead, the information will show up as decibel readings. Really, it's intended as a handy way of showing off where you might want to toss a range extender, to help get rid of dead spots. All of Roomba's vacuums, save for the lowest-end model, will support the feature. The beta program launches January 23rd and appears to only be available for U.S. users.

58 comments

  1. Can corporations make anything that does NOT spy? by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they can spy, they will. They've fully monetized the spying. Nobody seems to be able to "just" make something honest anymore. It's made me pathologically distrust every thing made in the last few years. There must be enough folks who just don't care if they are being used like that so that these scammy corporates can keep the system floating.

  2. Finally by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is exactly what I needed for all those times I use my laptop under the couch.

    1. Re:Finally by saccade.com · · Score: 2

      +1. Nobody uses their phone or laptop on the floor, so measuring the coverage there is pretty questionable. It's easy to image walls, furniture, appliances and interference patterns changing the signal strength from the floor to desk/chair height.

    2. Re:Finally by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I was going to write that too, just before I came on slashdot yesterday I stepped over my wife lying on the floor with her laptop and 2 textbooks doing some homework for her masters.

  3. US Users Only, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    No pooftahs need apply

    Only houses like we have in America...big, giant houses full of all sorts of cheap Chinese trash and trinkets, need a feature like this

    I would also like a "Find My Cheeseburger" feature, so my roomba can keep track of where I set my cheeseburger down, rather than me wasting time and effort walking from room to room trying to find it.

    1. Re:US Users Only, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ Bitter Aussie.

  4. Re:Can corporations make anything that does NOT sp by cheesyweasel · · Score: 1

    You are a product for targeted advertising, thought manipulation and surveillance. Why would corporations or governments want anything else?

  5. Phones home. To? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. China.

  6. When you're not at home by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I came home the other day and caught my Roomba watching a video of an arduino plugging into a raspberry pi.

    1. Re:When you're not at home by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      What you didn't see was the 3D printer in the dark corner of the room, oozing white PLA while watching those two getting interconnected.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:When you're not at home by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      eww, interracial computer porn. :(

      is nothing sacred?

    3. Re:When you're not at home by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Do Rhoombas still enjoy making abstract art in your living room when it encounters a puddle of cat throw up? Or have they solved that, so now they've moved on to wi-fi maps?

    4. Re: When you're not at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already have something that handles cat puke. A dog. He freakin loves it too.

    5. Re:When you're not at home by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      eww, interracial computer porn. :(

      is nothing sacred?

      gives a whole new meaning to big-endian.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  7. Cat Scan by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Will it account for Cat cause interference?

    1. Re:Cat Scan by ls671 · · Score: 3, Funny

      cat 5 or cat 6?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Cat Scan by FIlmsFamily · · Score: 1

      Everyone says like you,

    3. Re:Cat Scan by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

      CAT 5, what else ?!?

  8. Better than a Poopocalypse by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Dad Describes What Happens When Roomba Meets Dog Poop.

    I suppose it can do both though.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  9. Who needs that? by no-body · · Score: 1

    If I am in a corner where things don't work - Cell/WiFi, I know it. Don't need confirmation.
    If that device would make an internal map of it's cleaning thoroughness, i. e. how often it covers an area, that may be useful for trusting this thing but ....
    gadgets, gadgets, sales, sales and - we know what's good for you, you won't need a choice anymore ...

    In particular what kind of web interface you need - mobile or desktop. Sure won't use /. on a mobile because I hate the interface!!!

  10. Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    What is this penchant so many engineers have for adding needless complexity to (what should be) relatively simple, single-purpose devices?

    When I read this news, two things immediately come to my mind:

    - This will likely turn into another massive violation of people's privacy
    - This is now just another thing that can and will go wrong with an already-expensive device, almost certainly shortening its usable lifetime

    Followed soon on by a third thought:

    - Never buy a Roomba

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an obvious use of something that wanders around your house. But, yes, did I need this? I suppose it's handy but how do you sell this? If Roomba isn't selling APs, I just don't understand why they would bother.

    2. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is this penchant so many engineers have for adding needless complexity to (what should be) relatively simple, single-purpose devices?

      Orders. An engineer's job is to answer marketing's question with "yes, I can do that."

      I had a brief moment of weakness/curiosity so I decided to look at what these guys are selling, and I think I spotted what they're up to. Check out their Roomba model comparison chart. Go ahead, you don't have to buy anything. Look. What do you see?

      The first thing I saw, is that they have multiple models. Gotta admit, I didn't know that.

      Check out the bullet points. There are some dubious "features" there, but a couple stand out, almost as negative things where you might think "WTF, some Roombas can't do that?" Don't you want tangle-free rollers? Of course you do, unless you're a tangle-lover! The multi-room cleaning "feature" shocked me too. Does that mean with the cheaper Roombas, you have to get one for every room? Fuck that.

      It's about upselling. I think that's 100% of it. But maybe we all have different buttons to press, and what gets me to think "I have to get a Roomba 960 or else there's no point in getting any Roomba at all" is different from what might make you decide to get a 960 or none at all. ;-)

      Of course, the easiest solution is to get none at all. But let's say your spouse wants one, and it's decided: you're getting something. Maybe another stupid fucking bullet point would push your button. Obviously, silly stuff like wifi mapping ain't it, but everyone has their eccentricities, and if they keep piling on weird features, something could tip you into the upsell.

      Maybe?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is much of an invasion of privacy. Roomba already builds (and sells the data from) maps of people's houses.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      It's not even always about upselling needed features. Having useless features on the higher end models is a form of price discrimination. You are always going to have a certain group of people that will buy the highest model because they can afford it. By having those useless features, you can get more money from those people while still be able to sell the normal model to more price sensitive people. It's the same reason that you see "limited edition" models of certain products for $50 more where literally the only difference is the color.

    5. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by dj245 · · Score: 1

      It's about upselling. I think that's 100% of it. But maybe we all have different buttons to press, and what gets me to think "I have to get a Roomba 960 or else there's no point in getting any Roomba at all" is different from what might make you decide to get a 960 or none at all. ;-)

      And everyone is doing it now. I bought a Neato Botvac about 3 years ago, and back then you had your choice of the base model or upgraded brush. Now their model chart shows 5 different models across 2 different product generations. But unlike the Roomba, there is almost no difference between the models except for battery capacity and all the various wifi features. If you just want a robot vacuum that maps the rooms (Roomba's multi-room feature), ALL the botvacs have that feature going back at least 3 generations.

      Not to mention that these robot vacuums need more maintenance than normal vacuums. I have a 10 year old Wal-mart upright vacuum that has had no problems whatsoever- the washable filter has been washed dozens of times and the non-washable one looks brand new. Our botvac needs a new battery every August (anniversary of purchasing it) and the brush is usually in tatters after 1 year also.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    6. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by swillden · · Score: 1

      It's about upselling.

      Sort of, but not exactly. It's about having a product in every price point. The value of a robot vacuum is not the same to every person, both because some get more value from it, and because some value money less. The Laffer curve says that to maximize profit with a single product you lower the price until the marginal increase in profit due to volume matches the marginal decrease in profit due to lower sale price. But if you do that, you're leaving money on the table because a lot of people would have been willing to pay more.

      The fix is to have a range of products at different price points. To some extent you do this by making versions of varying quality, so the higher-priced units cost more to make and are better (but still have roughly the same profit margin, which means more actual profit for the higher-end versions). But there's a limit to how much real differentiation you can make. The solution is to introduce lots of small feature differences, including deliberately disabling features on some models. Buyers will almost always get the most expensive model they can afford, or maybe just one step down, as long as there is some difference that they think they might like to have.

      The most, er, interesting examples of this are when companies sell the exact same product at different price points. A factory may put two different logos on the same product and sell them at different prices, for example. IBM was famous back in the day for selling "single-CPU" mainframes that were actually delivered with four CPUs on board. If you wanted to upgrade your computer and make it faster, they sent a guy out to turn on some more cores in exchange for a hefty fee. Or later, they turned them on for you remotely. And if your check bounced they turned them right back off.

      Coupons and other sorts of discounts are another tactic. You can set the normal price high but occasionally sell it for less via some mechanism that is just complicated or difficult enough that those who can afford the higher price won't bother.

      Depending on your perspective, these shenanigans are either cheating or giving the customer what they want at the price they want to pay.

      Of course, mass personalization may mean that companies don't have to do this so much any more. Rather than having a half-dozen different products at different price points, they can make only one... but based on knowing who you are they can offer you the highest price you're willing to pay.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this penchant so many engineers have for adding needless complexity to (what should be) relatively simple, single-purpose devices?

      Orders. An engineer's job is to answer marketing's question with "yes, I can do that."

      I had a brief moment of weakness/curiosity so I decided to look at what these guys are selling, and I think I spotted what they're up to. Check out their Roomba model comparison chart. Go ahead, you don't have to buy anything. Look. What do you see?

      The first thing I saw, is that they have multiple models. Gotta admit, I didn't know that.

      Check out the bullet points. There are some dubious "features" there, but a couple stand out, almost as negative things where you might think "WTF, some Roombas can't do that?" Don't you want tangle-free rollers? Of course you do, unless you're a tangle-lover! The multi-room cleaning "feature" shocked me too. Does that mean with the cheaper Roombas, you have to get one for every room? Fuck that.

      It's about upselling. I think that's 100% of it. But maybe we all have different buttons to press, and what gets me to think "I have to get a Roomba 960 or else there's no point in getting any Roomba at all" is different from what might make you decide to get a 960 or none at all. ;-)

      Of course, the easiest solution is to get none at all. But let's say your spouse wants one, and it's decided: you're getting something. Maybe another stupid fucking bullet point would push your button. Obviously, silly stuff like wifi mapping ain't it, but everyone has their eccentricities, and if they keep piling on weird features, something could tip you into the upsell.

      Maybe?

      The multi-room feature has an explanation: The traditional roomba navigation method was basically to run until you hit something, and then bounce off at a random angle. It works fine in a single room: It may not get everything on every run, but on average through the week it'll cover everything evenly without having to faff about with computer vision. What it does not do is handle multiple rooms intelligently. I believe they made some models that let you set up "beacons" to guide it into the next room, but they seem to have retired those. In comparison, the new models use multiple cameras and computer vision to build a map of the surroundings, and use that map to try and cover the entire floor in every room.

      This means they have three levels of "multi-room" support: None at all; the old/retired hack with beacons, and the modern mapping. The cheaper lines are still based on the older technology, and thus only really work in a single space. Of course, the nice and sensible thing to do would have been to just retire everything but the camera/mapping models; I sincerely doubt the cameras and the SoC to run them adds that much to the cost. Their competition is basically split between companies doing only the old tech (no-name chinese stuff) and companies only doing mapping; I believe roomba/iRobot are about the only ones selling both kinds still.

    8. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      have for adding needless complexityto (what should be) relatively simple, single-purpose devices?

      Given there's an industry for mapping your indoor WiFi coverage to help you fix the problems in your house, your word "needless" needs some redefining.
      Given that this device effectively already has WiFi, already builds maps of the house, already moves around, is technologically anything other than "simple" your entire post actually makes very little sense.

    9. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      My normal vacuum needs maintenance all the time. If you have kids with long hair, take the rolller off the bottom and cut all that hair off every 6 months or so, you'll thank me.

    10. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've convinced me. I'm buying you.

    11. Re:Engineers - the dumbest smart people around by thomn8r · · Score: 1

      If you have kids with long hair, take the kids and cut all that hair off every 6 months or so, you'll thank me.

      FTFY

  11. No upload speed by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed, the device gives no clue about upload speeds, since it only report the strength of the received signal. Getting information about the upload channel would require an agent on the Access Point.

    1. Re:No upload speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the device gives no clue about upload speeds, since it only report the strength of the received signal. Getting information about the upload channel would require an agent on the Access Point.

      So does your broom or vacuum need WIFI? If not, why does this?

    2. Re:No upload speed by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      The robot logs received signal strength. If you want to log how the signal it sends is received at the Access Point, you need some software on the Access Point.

  12. Re:Can corporations make anything that does NOT sp by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Rest assured some fine-print on page 147 of the "license agreement" will allow "selected affiliates" to use the data to "enhance customer product information and shopping experiences" (spam).

  13. Roombas vs Stairs? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    That would useful. Wifiâ(TM)s are so early 2000â(TM)s.

  14. Why? For the love of god, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on my second Roomba vacuum ... and I've noticed they keep getting more expensive.

    Apparently filling it with useless shit nobody needs is the reason for this.

    There is no fucking need for my fucking robot vacuum to be operated via an app, accessing or mapping wifi, or doing anything with internet connectivity.

    They might sell more Roombas if they stopped filling them with useless shit.

  15. Re:Why? For the love of god, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop buying roomba then

    look at neato for example, better products for less money

  16. make sure those low reception sites are clean... by maybe111 · · Score: 1

    as clean as a whistle...

    why don't they map cellphone signals instead? that would probably be more useful because I have no problems with my wifi...

  17. Wifi in a vacuum cleaner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This truly sucks. Well, probably more privacy, if not dirt.

  18. Roombas randomly move around room by NeumannCons · · Score: 1

    I really think that roombas randomly move around rooms hoping to eventually get around all the furniture legs and other assorted obstacles. Eventually, with enough time, they can hope to reach every location. Limited time and insidiously placed chair legs mean they, for some reason miss portions of rooms. If the roomba engineers could focus on getting to ever part of a room (perhaps do something like "map" a room and put in a bigger dust bin) that would be an achievement.

    I *know* where my wifi signal is low. Even if I didn't, would it be more useful to walk around with my phone and watch the bars or wait for the vac to hopefully do this for me (only to find it missed half the room).

    1. Re:Roombas randomly move around room by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I *know* where my wifi signal is low.

      Even if you didn't, the procedure is pretty simple: don't get a signal where you are? Move.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Roombas randomly move around room by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      Heh, my first Roomba would obsessively clean one corner of our kitchen about 5 times, go off to another area, then end up back in the same corner for another 3 or 4 cleaning rituals. Their mapping algorithm was seriously borked. We got a newer one about two years ago, seems to be better.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  19. Re: make sure those low reception sites are clean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one is partly solved with WiFi Calling for some Android phones and iPhones.
    Here ISPs are trying to piggyback guest WiFi access points onto the systems
    so that this will also work for visitors.

  20. Nice try, NSA... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...so you want to inspect at once what is hidden in the dust of my flat, and hack my WiFi AP!

  21. I was thinking of buying a Roomba until... by jools33 · · Score: 1

    A colleague of mine was describing his Roomba - he said it is quite simply the best way to move the dust around from one location in the apartment to another, than anyone has ever invented. that put me off somewhat.

    1. Re:I was thinking of buying a Roomba until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one and its great. It picks up a LOT of dust and dog hair, the dust container is filled up quickly. You do need to clean the brushes fairly often.

      I run it in various rooms about twice a week and we have noticeably less dust in corners, and carpets don't have dog hair. It actually works a lot better than I expected.

  22. Mapping vs non-Mapping by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Roomba, all the way up to the 8xx serie (and Scoobas, btw), still do "random dance around".
    They aimlessly go in any random direction, bump into things, etc. eventually, they'll end up covering the whole surface by the end of the program.
    At no moment do they have any idea where they are. They just notice the dock when they happen to come by in front of it during the random dance.

    (Also they don't have any Wifi. They either have some weird custom proprietary of ZigBee (up to 700 series) to communicate with the non-IR remote and with automatic lightwalls, or have Bluetooth (800 series) to communicate with your smartphone)

    In case of cat throw-ups, they'll still enjoy making abstract art in your living room, with the occasional spiral shape thrown in for good looks.

    Roomba starting with the 9xx serie (and Braava) having mapping capabilities (older Braava detect a set of IR laser points projected on the ceiling by a special "Northstar" navigation cube. Newer hardware has a webcam, and a DSP that extracts a set of "high contrast points"). The roomba exactly knows where it is at any moment of time and thus can build a map of the place.
    Because it has an exact known position and a rough map, it doesn't wander aimlessly, but does precise S lines accross the floor.
    (It also covers everything eventually, end up being measurably the same performance as the random work, but looks a little bit better from the outside).
    Because of the same, it's also able to directly head for the dock when needed, and can resume cleaning where it left once charged.
    It also comes with Wifi for communicating with the smartphone (and optionally the cloud).

    In case of cat throw up, it will very meticulously spead it in straight zig-zaging line across your floor, eventually building a nice grid.

    So which cat trow up artwork you like (abstract vs meticulous grid) depends on your taste, but your dog will still enjoy licking it all the same.

    (More seriously: The reason they can do wifi maps before perfecting the cleaning is simply because the maps come for free for a device that already has mapping technology plus an always on wifi antenna).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  23. Poop grid by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Roomba 900 are mapping robots (unlike their predecessors).
    They don't do random dance. They know their exact position in the map and are bit more orderly in their path.

    So, instead of a poopocalypse, you're look in forward, for a very meticulous precise and neat poop grid zig-zaging across your floor.

    The by-now-4-yo kid will smell like poop when walking to your room all the same.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  24. Mapping by DrYak · · Score: 1

    If that device would make an internal map of it's cleaning thoroughness, i. e. how often it covers an area, that may be useful for trusting this thing

    Actually, that the whole purpose of Roomba 900 series (and Braava) : they are able to know their exact position,
    and thus can draw a nice map of where and how often they've been.

    (But in the end, they actually aren't that much more efficient that their "random dance" predecessors)

    Making a map of wifi signal basically comes free for a device that already automatically maps its surroundings and has an always-on wifi antenna.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  25. Bullet points by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Roomba model comparison chart. Go ahead, you don't have to buy anything. Look. What do you see?
    The first thing I saw, is that they have multiple models. Gotta admit, I didn't know that.

    Check out the bullet points. There are some dubious "features" there, but a couple stand out, almost as negative things where you might think "WTF, some Roombas can't do that?"{...} The multi-room cleaning "feature" shocked me too. Does that mean with the cheaper Roombas, you have to get one for every room? Fuck that.

    Well most of the things on this list are exactly that : stupid arbitrary checkbox points, nothing more.

    Basically cheaper roomba have smaller batteries than more expensive one (so they can only clean for a shorter amount of time until they need to dock back for charging). But that's about the main difference.

    Newer roomba (since the 800) have a bit better roller which might get a little bit less mess, but not by much. But they still sell the olders because they still have them in their warehouse and they are cheap now that they try to get rid of them.

    The 900 serie is completely different, in that it uses a camera to track its exact position (think a turned-up optical mouse). So it doesn't randomly dance everywhere until it has covered eventually the whole floor, instead it makes neat orderly grid zig-zags.
    But unless you have an extremely weirdly shaped flat, it doesn't matter much, both methods will cover everything eventually, one just looks a tiny bit more oderly from the outside.

    That means all robot can clean multiple rooms, the battery run time is the only limiting factor.
    (The 900 being the small exception : as it knows it position it can return to dock, charge, and resume cleaning. It can thus clean a surface much larger than what could be done on a single charge. So if you planned to clean a giant aerospatial hangar, you might need one).

    etc.

    It's about upselling. I think that's 100% of it. But maybe we all have different buttons to press, and what gets me to think "I have to get a Roomba 960 or else there's no point in getting any Roomba at all" is different from what might make you decide to get a 960 or none at all. ;-)

    Yup. It's a huge marketing bullshit to make the more expensive look more desirable.

    But let's say your spouse wants one, and it's decided: you're getting something. Maybe another stupid fucking bullet point would push your button.

    Or you know, maybe like whenever buying any expensive gadget, you read some review, or even better, ask friends who have one for advice.
    And then realize that maybe the cheap one actually does the job for you.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  26. Relative complexity by DrYak · · Score: 1

    What is this penchant so many engineers have for adding needless complexity to (what should be) relatively simple, single-purpose devices? {...} This is now just another thing that can and will go wrong with an already-expensive device, almost certainly shortening its usable lifetime

    This xkcd is actually relevant here.

    In this case it's not complex at all.

    The 900 series is already making a map of its surrounding as it works (unlike its predecessors, it doesn't random dance. It constantly tracks its exact position using a camera a bit like an upturned mouse).
    It already records per-position information from its sensors in this map (mostly related to sensors that detect presence of dirt).

    It has an always-on wifi antenna,
    so recording the strength of signal as goes around drawing it's map comes for free.

    It's not a needless complexity, it's just about adding 1 line of code to their program and suddenly having a new fun feature.

    ---

    the questions lie more upstream :

    - was it really worth adding the mapping feature ? it's a complex power-hungry feature, but in the end of the day, unless you have an extremely weirdly shaped flat (are Escher and Dali your architects ?) the "randomly going aimlessly everywhere until everything is eventually covered" of the predecessors works equally well.
    The only difference is that now the roomba can stop cleaning, go back straight to the dock to charge, and then resume where it was. So if you want to clean NASA-sized hangars over several charging cycles, it might be worth it...

    - was it really worth adding Wifi, so that not only can you use you smartphone as a remote (like the bluetooth enabled 800 series predecessors), or an actual IR or proprietary-ZigBee-like stuff remote like previous models (up to 700), but now thanks to wifi you can also optionnally connect it to the cloud and send it cleaning commands from outside the house ?
    I doubt there are that many use cases where this is necessary.

    Though on the other hand, the security implication are much lower. (It's a cleaning robot. It doesn't have that much processing power. It's doesn't get an actual video stream from the camera, but a list of high-contrast points from the DSP connected to the cam. There isn't much to be gained from those points if a bug accidentally leaks them online. My metaphore of up-turned mouse is apt as a mouse also doesn't send a video feed to the computer)

    This will likely turn into another massive violation of people's privacy

    I don't know if this is going to open any much more danger than before :
    - the roomba 900 already make a map of the floor.
    - the roomba is already connected to your Wifi.
    Storing the strengh of the connection as the map is built doesn't give much more risks.

    And even the current Wifi getting hacked shouldn't disclose too much stuff.
    (Due to limited computing power budget, the Roomba 900 don't actually "see" only get very precise position from their pseudo-mouse).

    Followed soon on by a third thought:
    - Never buy a Roomba

    Actually : never skip doing some research before buying any expensive toy.

    In fact :
    - Nearly all vacuuming robots, including absolutely all of their competitors, and including irobot's roomba 900 series and braava, all make a map of their surrounding (though not all are internet connected).
    Irobot was simply late at the game (because, as noticed above, it actually doesn't bring much in practice. It just looks less messy to an observer).

    - All older roomba (up to 800 serie, and their scooba) (also a few other manufacturer who have sublicensed the design) (as well as no-name asian clones of these) don't do any mapping, they just aimlessly wander around until everything is eventually covered. (But as proven by long-exposure photos, it basically gives the same end result). None of them have any internet connection, only 8

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  27. Re:Can corporations make anything that does NOT sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gangstalking is not real. Take your meds.

  28. Re:Can corporations make anything that does NOT sp by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

    Can corporations make anything that does NOT spy?

    Now that you mention it, I should probably read the EULA for these baby wipes...

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.
  29. Re:Can corporations make anything that does NOT sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, "my vacuum cleaning is spying on me" is not longer a delusion. I KNEW IT!

  30. Re:Can corporations make anything that does NOT sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would corporations or governments want anything else?

    They want to be rid of you. You're a cost that they don't want to pay for. The targeted advertising, thought manipulation and surveillance is just a temporary measure until they can afford to start offing people. After all it's much more expensive to constantly surveil, manipulate, beg, and begrudgingly provide for, than it it is to shoot. They still want the money you stole from them, they are just playing the long game to get it back.