Slashdot Mirror


Fake 'Inbound Missile' Alert Sent To Every Cellphone in Hawaii (chicagotribune.com)

"Somebody sent out a false emergency alert to all cell phones in Hawaii saying, 'BALLISTIC MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII. SEEK IMMEDIATE SHELTER. THIS IS NOT A DRILL'," writes Slashdot reader flopwich, adding "Somebody's had better days at work." The Associated Press reports: In a conciliatory news conference later in the day, Hawaii officials apologized for the mistake and vowed to ensure it will never happen again. Hawaii Emergency Management Agency Administrator Vern Miyagi said the error happened when someone hit the wrong button. "We made a mistake," said Miyagi. For nearly 40 minutes, it seemed like the world was about to end in Hawaii, an island paradise already jittery over the threat of nuclear-tipped missiles from North Korea...

On the H-3, a major highway north of Honolulu, vehicles sat empty after drivers left them to run to a nearby tunnel after the alert showed up, the Honolulu Star-Advertiser reported. Workers at a golf club huddled in a kitchen fearing the worst... The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency tweeted there was no threat about 10 minutes after the initial alert, but that didn't reach people who aren't on the social media platform. A revised alert informing of the "false alarm" didn't reach cellphones until 38 minutes later, according to the time stamp on images people shared on social media.

227 comments

  1. Brown Pants by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bring me my Brown Pants!!

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Brown Pants by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      From Red Dwarf:

      Kryten: "I suggest we go to red alert."
      Cat: "Forget red alert. I say we go straight to brown alert!"
      Kryten: "But sir, we don't have brown alert."
      Cat: "You won't be saying that in a minute...and don't say I didn't alert you!"

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Brown Pants by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Are you sure, sir? It does mean changing the bulb.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    3. Re:Brown Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bring me my Brown Pants!!

      This guy gets it!

    4. Re:Brown Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happened on Princeton U's radio station in the 70's. Alert came on to seek cover, us standing on high ground in a building with no basement said our goodby's. DJ came back on air out of breath, probably from the john with brown pants, and said it was only a drill.

      Either he put in the wrong tape while running to the head or it being a college station someone thought it would be funny to switch labels :(

    5. Re: Brown Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha that's funny

  2. PQP by btaranto · · Score: 0

    FDP

  3. State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The White House said President Donald Trump, at his private club in Florida, was briefed on the false alert. White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said it "was purely a state exercise."

    Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

    1. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A fearful population is easier to manipulate.

    2. Re: State Exercise? by sound+vision · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm thinking it may not have been so accidental. This is possibly the only way to get good data on how effective the warnings are. My guess: not very effective at this point. But someone higher up needed that data to complete his that assessment regarding war with the Koreans.

    3. Re: State Exercise? by Monster_user · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Purely a state exercise" is disavowing all knowledge and responsibility at the Federal level. Translation: "We're staying out of this one."

    4. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a missile was fired but Pyong said it was just a test instead of the real thing. I find it hard to believe that there is a simple little "Click here to send bomb warning" button in any system that addresses every cell phone in the state.

    5. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Imagine when someone hacks it: buy v1agr@ now!

    6. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and idiots always make that comment.

      I'm pretty sure if you check you will find that North Korea has missiles that can reach Hawaii, nukes, and have stated their interested in attacking the US. You may recall they have already launched missiles over Japan. North Korea poses a genuine threat. The UN has heavily sanctioned them over it. Stop being an idiot.

    7. Re:State Exercise? by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

      Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

      It was a mistake by state officials, plain and simple.

      Hawaii officials give timeline of events surrounding false alarm

      Approx. 8.05 a.m.: A routine internal test during a shift change was initiated. This was a test that involved the Emergency Alert System, the Wireless Emergency Alert, but no warning sirens.

      8.07 a.m.: A warning was erroneously triggered statewide by an employee at the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency (HI-EMA).

      8.10 a.m.: State Adjutant Maj. Gen. Joe Logan validated with the US Pacific Command that there was no missile launch.

      Honolulu Police Department notified of the false alarm by HI-EMA.

      8.13 a.m.: State Warning Point issues a cancellation of the Civil Danger Warning Message. This would have prevented the initial alert from being rebroadcast to phones that may not have received it yet. For instance, if a phone was not on at 8.07am, it would not receive the alert later on.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re: State Exercise? by kenh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

      Yes.

      It was a state warning system activated by state employees that was sent to everyone in the state of Hawaii.

      The clear meaning is that there was no federal involvement in the alert.

      --
      Ken
    9. Re:State Exercise? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

      It was a mistake by state officials, plain and simple.

      My interst is that I would want to know where the thing is aimed for, so I could stand a few miles away and enjoy the show. Radiation poisioning isn't pretty, and to actually witness the explosion, then get quickly incinerated seems like the ticket. Google Hiroshi Ouchi - but only if you have a very strong stomach. Ouchi and another fellow were pouring Uranyl Nitrate solution into a container, and for some reason poured 16 Kilograms worth of Uranium into a vessel that was only supposed to have 2.4, and there went the pretty blue flash that announced to them that they had a criticality. Ouchi caught 17 freaking sieverts of radiation, when 8 is likely to kill ya. His buddy Shinohara experienced 10 sieverts. They ded. For some reason the powers that be did everything possible to keep him alive, possibly to save face, but the combination of having no more skin, losing incredible amounts of bodily fluids - one day over 20 Kg, and organ failure. 83 friction days of nuclear provided happieness, as you can see by his last photo. But once again, don't look if you are sensitive - it looks like something from a horror movie.

      Which is why my popcorn and tequila party to witness the event and check out before I turn into Mr Ouchi is much more appealing. And if it is a fake or a mistake, at least we had a fun party.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re: State Exercise? by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Ah, it's Saturday, so it's "the government never makes a mistake" today. Presumably tomorrow we'll go back to "the government can never do anything right".

      But if you want to go with a "it was a secret test" conspiracy theory, consider that the government doing the secret testing may not have been the American government.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. The average US citizen doesn't even know how many countries we are at war with. Then to top it off we possess enough nuclear technology to destroy the planet and invade any country threatening to drop the US Dollar. Then, we have so much propaganda, the average fool feels he has to preach what every singe US citizen has been exposed to as if they some sort of special knowledge. STFU.

    12. Re:State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. As in the *STATE* of Hawaii fucked up.

    13. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Then to top it off we possess enough nuclear technology to destroy the planet and invade any country threatening to drop the US Dollar."

      Even the 2 that have just as many nukes as us?
      You're crazy.

    14. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it had been a true mistake they would have prompty informed eeryone before those 40 minutes were over.

    15. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good morning, Agent Smith! How's the weather in Fort Meade today?

    16. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if Hawaii is part of the USA! Next you'll be claiming that Puerto Ricans are US citizens!

    17. Re:State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is becoming a pattern. We had the air raid alarms go off in Sweden fairly recently... again, just a "mistake" during a "routine test". And the official channels for explaining the alarm were never activated. Like the election of the US clown, I expect several actors are trying out how vulnerable our modern society really is.

    18. Re:State Exercise? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      So, if I shout "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, I can just say it was an "accident"? I suppose, with the right connections...

      The guy responsible should at least have to wear a pink tutu and dance the "Sugar Plum Fairy" downtown during rush hour.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you leaned on the fire alarm without looking, and people saw you do this unwittingly ad are willing to act as your witnesses, sure.

    20. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However effective it used to be, it's now a lot less effective. Schroedinger killed the cat.

    21. Re:State Exercise? by careysub · · Score: 2

      Scaring the crap out of everyone is considered "a state exercise?"

      It was a mistake by state officials, plain and simple.

      My interst is that I would want to know where the thing is aimed for, so I could stand a few miles away and enjoy the show. Radiation poisioning isn't pretty, and to actually witness the explosion, then get quickly incinerated seems like the ticket.

      Knowing where to be in Hawaii to see a nuclear attack, and not be injured, is easy to figure out.

      If North Korea is dropping one its new 250 kT warheads on Hawaii (which could possibly be a 500 kT design), they will be dropping it on the Honolulu/Pearl Harbor urban/military complex. They are cheek by jowl and regardless of the actual aim point, the entire area will get devastated. 72% of Hawaii's entire population lives on Oahu (a total of 950,000 people in the island) and 81% of those live in or near the Honolulu urban area.

      According to NukeMap site (airburst option) such an attack with a 250 kT warhead on downtown Honolulu would kill about 215,000 and injure 155,000, thus making 40% of the population of Oahu (and 30% of the entire state) as casualties. If the military complex at Pearl Harbor is targets then "only" 40,000 would die, but 180,000 would be injured.The worst case, a 500 kT warhead on Honolulu would kill 265,000 and injure 175,000.

      An attack would likely be an airburst (which produces the most blast and thermal radiation damage) and which produces no local fallout. Even if a ground burst the tradewinds blow steadily to the south-west, to west and blow the fallout away from the rest of the island.

      So the place to be is somewhere on Oahu that is outside of the southern coastal strip, and you will want to be at least nine miles away from its detonation point. This would put you outside of the thermal burn range (even for first degree) even if its yield is 500 kT. So most anywhere on the north half of the island will be fine.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    22. Re:State Exercise? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 2

      The official statement is that state employee "hit the wrong button on a computer". Unlike a physical button you'd imagine when he clicked "Send Alert To Everyone In State" button there would be a "Are you sure?" follow up question -- or two -- with possibly "Sending mass alert in 10...9...8... press Cancel to abort". And then if it was a mistake, wouldn't he have clicked on the button again and said "sorry ignore the last one" immediately, not after 38 minutes?

      Could it be that the said employee was acting on his own, possibly having been in distress?

    23. Re:State Exercise? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      So the place to be is somewhere on Oahu that is outside of the southern coastal strip, and you will want to be at least nine miles away from its detonation point. This would put you outside of the thermal burn range (even for first degree) even if its yield is 500 kT. So most anywhere on the north half of the island will be fine.

      Assuming the incoming missile actually hits what it was targeting.

    24. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a mobile phone or just a mobile or a handy. When you say "cell phone" it makes you sound like a hillbilly rube.

    25. Re:State Exercise? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This would put you outside of the thermal burn range (even for first degree) even if its yield is 500 kT. So most anywhere on the north half of the island will be fine.

      Kinda makes everyone look forward to it.

      Your definition of fine is pretty interesting. Do you know that the North Korean strategy is to detonate exactly 1 150 KT device in an airburst?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re: State Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that's regional. In the US, going to the mobile store and telling them you're looking for a "handy" will probably result in a call to the police.

    27. Re:State Exercise? by lowkeyknight · · Score: 1
      I think you are making assumptions about the quality of the emergency messaging system that may not be as accurate as we might hope. I fear it's entirely possible that there is a simple "click and confirm" and loads of people click to confirm out of habit.

      In general, I find that, if the choice is between incompetence and conspiracy, incompetence is the answer. One requires a small number of people to be off their game, lazy, stupid, hungover, high, drunk or a combination of same. The other requires a much larger group of people to keep a secret of massive proportions, where failure to keep it (by bringing the conspiracy to light) would bring celebrity, quasi-hero status and the money and benefits that come with those.

    28. Re:State Exercise? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      I didn't think it was a conspiracy at all, just perhaps one upset guy or gal deciding to vent it out. After seeing more reports I believe it was more likely it was an honest mistake due to bad interface.

      What you said though makes me think if you need to design a confirmation dialog for a very impactful and very rarely used command, you could perhaps make its top left x,y coordinate random at least, and possibly change the order of buttons and the "skin" of the dialog as well.

    29. Re: State Exercise? by baristabrian · · Score: 0

      I have alerts turned off on my phone. I didnâ(TM)t get the alert. An hour or two later when I woke up, I found out about it from others.

      --
      -- "I'm not in a hurry; I'm in Hawaii." The Homeless Guy
    30. Re:State Exercise? by lowkeyknight · · Score: 1
      I think it'd be interesting to see how it affected human behavior, one way or the other.

      I'll be corrected if I'm wrong but I think something similar was played around with before, certainly a similar psychology is in place when varying the "tick to agree/tick to disagree" sets. Too frustrating for use (or at least sufficiently damaging to comfort and therefore profitability to be ignored by most software providers). However I think it might have a use in the specific circumstances you suggest.

    31. Re:State Exercise? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, you can't frustrate the users or treat them with contempt, they'll hate the system and make other mistakes. Maybe it can be preceded by an [OK]-only dialog saying something like "please confirm your choice in a popup that follows. It will appear randomly on the screen to reduce the chance of accidental activation. Thank you."

    32. Re:State Exercise? by lowkeyknight · · Score: 1
      That might do it. It's surprising how effective a simple, polite, explanation can be, even better if it gives time for thought, especially in a tense situation.

      I'm sure I remember that, I think Hebrew, actually has a word that if it appears, means essentially: "now stop reading/doing and actually think about this for a minute before continuing", or something similar. Presumably designed for scripture purposes or similar, but the principle is still valid.

    33. Re:State Exercise? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting. If people needed such a thing thousands of years ago we need it a lot more. Do you remember what word it is?

    34. Re:State Exercise? by lowkeyknight · · Score: 1

      I didn't, but my external memory backup did: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    35. Re:State Exercise? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it could be helpful to get in the habit of remembering the word throughout the day. Thank you.

  4. Orson Welles was an amateur. by sehlat · · Score: 4, Funny
  5. False alarm Trump hasn't brought us to nuclear war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not yet.

  6. Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This message ostensibly was sent to every cell phone in Hawaii - didn't the guy who "pushed the wrong button" get the alert as well?

    And seriously - their first thought when sending out a correction was a Tweet? Don't they have the ability to send an "all clear" over the same channel they sent the "LOOK OUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO DIE!!!" message?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't they have the ability to send an "all clear" over the same channel they sent the "LOOK OUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO DIE!!!" message?

      No, apparently they do not:

      "[Emergency alerts] aren't like text messages, where a sender can dash off a quick 'sorry my bad' if they mistype. IPAWS notices have a specific format, which must be composed formally and in advance. Audio files for broadcast notices must be recorded or generated and uploaded. Often, this has to be done by special software on special equipment."

      https://www.theatlantic.com/te...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by c · · Score: 2

      This message ostensibly was sent to every cell phone in Hawaii - didn't the guy who "pushed the wrong button" get the alert as well?

      Off hand, I'd expect that the kind of place that monitors for ICBM's and issues that sort of warning probably doesn't allow cell phones or many other kinds of wireless device. In a lot of cases, things like Internet access might also be locked down.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the history of the Cold War, it's a little disturbing that they didn't have a "sorry, that was a false alarm" message already formally prepared.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    4. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took 40 minutes because it takes 18 minutes for an ICBM to arrive in US airspace + another 18 minutes the counter-strike to reach enemy airspace, plus another 4 minutes to confirm that there's not another round of ICBMs headed this way.

    5. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lesson learned: Don't let Orson Welles plan your alert exercise.

    6. Re: Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Every kind of fake news takes a long time to correct. Otherwise, they would not serve their purpose well...

    7. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      This message ostensibly was sent to every cell phone in Hawaii - didn't the guy who "pushed the wrong button" get the alert as well?

      And seriously - their first thought when sending out a correction was a Tweet? Don't they have the ability to send an "all clear" over the same channel they sent the "LOOK OUT YOU'RE ABOUT TO DIE!!!" message?

      What I am interested in is the "pushed the wrong button" business. Aren't they required to have one of these? http://www.12voltunlimited.com... . I cannot imagine that if there was an actual button, it would have to have a switch guard. And if you have an alert that tells millions of people that they need to kiss their asses goodbye, a keyboard press to actuate is simply criminal.

      But I'll bet it was a keyboard press.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the history of forever, whenever bureaucracies fuck up - 'blame the new guy'. Someone thought it was a good idea and did it, likely for political reasons, it went down way worse than they thought and... So what was the follow up marketing meant to about, obviously stoking war fears, real war fears. Who was playing, drive war fears as an FCC distraction, make more War Industrial Complex funding more palatable, attack property values in Honolulu (Pearl Harbour is the number one target in the US and make no mistake but why force the reminder).

      They had better show some images of this magic, make an entire city panic, cause harm and suffering and even death as people try to escape, button with no safety features, otherwise I just wont believe. They were going to try something on, they still might in the next few weeks, some kind of PR=B$ stunt to push an agenda.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      the guy who "pushed the wrong button"

      Please don't say that again.

    10. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US gov/mil needed to see what the US population would do in that state and all over the USA, globally given a simple cellphone message for a set time.
      How would all diplomats in the USA react? Calls made, messages sent. Reactions in their embassy, communications used from their embassy out of the USA.
      Spies been watched by the FBI all over the USA react in any way at all?
      Do US survivalist have any national or global messaging system that was not yet under constant FBI/NSA/CIA watch?
      What did average survivalist do? Drive out to their bug out location? Stay at work? Why? Did they know it was a test? Nice way to find out who they are and who got seen on CCTV, via cell phone tracking driving around in a very different way after the message :)
      Did the message get repeated on unexpected and unknown communications networks? Totally new systems and unknown people who held back for just such a warning that had not been tracked by the NSA, CIA, GCHQ, FBI in the past?
      Ham radio, cell phone, telephone numbers, IRC, forums, social media, changes to web sites, visits to strange web sites by many people? Different, direct messages to unexpected and new militia groups all over the US once thought to be isolated in their states?
      Was the message a long conversation? A word? A number? Who passed it on locally deeper into the USA? Hops to different very networks all over the USA.
      Such unexpected and urgent communications would have been a real time study for the FBI, NSA uncovering all kinds of survival and militia groups that stayed so well hidden for so long only to be detected USA wide by one simple message.
      40 mins gave the study time to keep tracking all the people with "plans" all over the USA. Spies, embassy workers, US militia groups, cults, faith groups, dual citizens, survivalist, people in the US mil/gov/contractors, police might have done something very interesting for 40 mins.
      Who stayed at their job in the US mil/gov/police? Who phoned their kin, strangers when they should not due to gov/mil secrecy? Who got a message and/or responded to someone they never had contact with in the past?
      One message gave the FBI, US mil, police and NSA years of information on their workers, contractors, staff, special forces. Who made calls to tell people it was all a test...
      Who stayed loyal to the US mil/gov and who was talking to people.
      Now the US gov knows who will do what in time of war.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    11. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by dohzer · · Score: 2

      You've got to inform the guy with the massive button so he knows it's fake, so naturally you send a tweet.
      After that you can update all the plebs.

    12. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by epine · · Score: 1

      something very interesting for 40 mins

      It's far from obvious to me that any of these (no doubt mostly pathetic) apocalyptic machinations pass the "very interesting" test.

      Nor is it obvious to me that the government of America (in the large) is just a grown up version of that strange kid in sixth grade who snuck a live iguana into the girl's change room—just to see what they would do.

    13. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Such systems have oversight and a clear command structure. Its not a one person GUI mouse click in city hall to send everyone a message like that.
      No one system user would be allowed to do a fat-finger error https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... with that kind of warning.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    14. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So to be clear they had a formally formatted and pre-prepared alert for "incoming missile", but don't have one for "crisis over"? That seems counter-intuitive.

    15. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      So have a prerecorded / preformatted "our bad, nothing going on" message.

      Seriously, if you receive a missile warning over an official emergency broadcast channel that stresses "this is not a drill", would you trust an "all clear" message that's sent as a bloody tweet?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    16. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Given the history of the Cold War, it's a little disturbing that they didn't have a "sorry, that was a false alarm" message already formally prepared.

      You do not want messages like that around. If the enemy can get their hands on an official message from you that says that then they can send it to cancel your response to their attack.

      False positives and false negatives aren't equally bad. In most situations one of them is worse than the other.

    17. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How would all diplomats in the USA react? Calls made, messages sent. Reactions in their embassy, communications used from their embassy out of the USA.

      How many embassies are in Hawaii? I'll give you a clue, it's a number less than 1.

      Did the message get repeated on unexpected and unknown communications networks? Totally new systems and unknown people who held back for just such a warning that had not been tracked by the NSA, CIA, GCHQ, FBI in the past?

      Because "broadcast to every cellphone in the state" is not widely disseminated enough already? Who would you repeat it to, and why?

      Ham radio, cell phone, telephone numbers, IRC, forums, social media, changes to web sites, visits to strange web sites by many people? Different, direct messages to unexpected and new militia groups all over the US once thought to be isolated in their states?

      Saying what? What do you imagine a hypothetical agent in Hawaii would communicate to some militiaman in Minnesota in this scenario? If the alert is for real, then he'll know about it pretty soon anyway.

      Seriously, in this scenario I expect a lot of people tried to contact their loved ones, wherever they were. That will have included quite a lot of people calling others whom they had seldom called before, saying all kinds of things that, to an eavesdropper, would sound all kinds of cryptic. Picking through tens of thousands of those messages on the offchance that one of them might be a code? Doesn't sound like a very rewarding use of anyone's time.

      There is such a thing as too paranoid.

      If you want to get all conspiracy-theorist about this, I suggest: the alarm was in fact triggered by North Korean hackers, and the government is covering that up. That at least would have a plausible motivation.

    18. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      People in a panic make mistakes. What would be the consequences if there really was an incoming missile and the "all clear" got sent out?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, if the enemy has their hands on the real messages, they can periodically create mass panic and also discredit the system at the same time. I don't think there's much you can do about scenarios where the enemy can control the system beyond try to prevent them from controlling the system.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      Saw a documentary about the border of North Korea with China. It's basically a river. From China you can see houses close to the river bank on the other side. Those are all high ranking officers of the North Korean Army. That way when the shit hits the fan, they're the first to flee to China.

    21. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC why would the US have an online system like that that would be facing the internet?
      At some stage in this "test" a real person in the USA with clearance had to physically give an order to allow the message to be sent. That would need some great social engineering on site :)
      AC got a "clue" on how many other nations nationals are spying on the US navy in Hawaii? They would notice a strange message in real time. Some of them might have made contact with someone.
      AC re you "If the alert is for real" then thanks to networks all over the US they got a few mins warning extra.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    22. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Be the same in the USA.
      Just watch for all the "other agency people" return to Idaho, Montana, Wyoming. Some parts of Oregon and Washington.
      The SUV's from the north east of the US arrive with people driving out to their summer cabins (bunkers).
      No influx of gov/mil/contractors from the intelligence services to their safe havens? Its all just a test until they drive in.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    23. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

      Agile project. This feature was not prioritized now. Maybe in Sprint 24.

      --
      Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    24. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... survival and militia groups that stayed so well hidden ...

      Most groups need to recruit members, have regular training sessions and buy equipment. If they can do all that without the FBI/NSA detecting them, they can respond for real in the same manner.

      ... a warning that had not been tracked by the NSA, CIA, GCHQ, FBI ...

      Again, if it hasn't been detected, this is unlikely to change that. Knowing that a message traveled from point A to point B without internet, telephone, television, radio, doesn't tell the TLAs where to look. Disaster places massive stress on transport and communication infrastructure so there will not be spare resources for spy-hunting.

      ... a long conversation?

      Ideally, voice and internet will be disabled during an emergency, forcing everyone to SMS texts. Regardless, sheer quantity can disable digital networks, meaning it is unable to provide tracking data. Analog networks tend to be public broadcast: Commercial radio and ham/CB radio; meaning either a numbers station or public news. Again, the quantity of transmissions will make it impossible to find the spy among the crowd.

      ... driving around in a very different way ...

      Most people will be driving to what they consider a safe spot, which probably won't be their normal destination. Even survivalists must calculate if they are in range of their bunker, or caught unawares like everyone else. Even "in range" is problematic since one doesn't know when the missiles will hit; 30 minutes, 20? Then there's the type of survivalist: The home-bunker type who will hide as best he can, the natural-disaster type who will bug-out to another city, or the zombie-apocalypse type who will bug-out to a well-stocked, secluded mountain fortress. Most of those won't be useful or nearby in a suburban assault by ICBMs.

      ... strangers when they should not, due to gov/mil secrecy?

      It's a bit pointless telling the enemy your secret facility/weapon is about to be destroyed. They can easily discover that from the reports of the disaster. Besides most traitors aren't true believers, they're in it for ego or entertainment. (It's also why traitors rarely conduct assassinations.) They're unlikely to spend their last minutes helping the enemy.

      ... who will do what in time of war.

      War objectors and dissenters tend to not hide, letting the government deal with them and any undesirables (eg. Japanese citizens), easily enough. The issue is not small militias but guerrilla fighters: Rebels well-funded by a third party, equipped to disrupt government's control and command of its cities.

      First, the government needs to recognize there is widespread military activism against it, then eliminate the rebels before declaring war. The number of revolutions in history suggests that might be impossible. This is why '1984' is so relevant: A ruling elite wins by oppressing freedom and individuality until all thought of disobedience and cynicism of authority is removed. Thus, war becomes a tool for enabling oppression.

    25. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Most groups need to recruit members". The few groups that did not get filled with FBI informants and undercover police, or are gov created front groups have changed from accepting "recruits" to seeking and inviting members.
      If a person is seeking to join most interesting groups, they are no longer interested. Trust is now with family, community, faith groups, friends.
      Only after a long test of social media, background and consideration will people be approached and made an offer.
      Re "It's a bit pointless telling the enemy your secret facility/weapon" What the US mil is most interested in is who kept what information about the message secret for 40 mins and who just had to phone home, their friends, the media.
      Re War objectors and dissenters tend to ?.
      The new hiring practices of virtue signaling and political correctness has seen a drop in the normal background and ongoing evaluations of people with a security clearance. Lower standards and a lot of new contractors. A test is a nice way to find out who did what.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    26. Re: Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least they were the ones who pushed the wrong button, not Kim Jong Un.

    27. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[Emergency alerts] aren't like text messages, where a sender can dash off a quick 'sorry my bad' if they mistype. IPAWS notices have a specific format, which must be composed formally and in advance. Audio files for broadcast notices must be recorded or generated and uploaded. Often, this has to be done by special software on special equipment."

      Wow. That’s like, REALLY fucking stupid. Kind of like an AED (Automatic External Defibrillator) that doesn’t bother to check for the presence of normal sinus rhythm before shocking the shit out of someone. Glaring flaw in system identified, perhaps?

    28. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If they were pre-recorded then it is a mistake that can easily be reversed. Especially since the all-clear with no prior would be obviously incorrect.

      In any case it sounds like it is a difficult and convoluted process according to the GP to send one of these out. Having an area in a state of emergency simply because it takes time to record a message to say the emergency is over is not without consequence either.

    29. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AED devices monitor the rhythm before they apply any stimulation. I have a relative who works on them. They also adjust themselves to apply the right patterns and power levels for the particular patient, much like a pacemaker.

    30. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I try to delete a DVD recording, I get a message saying, "Do you really want to delete this? Yes or no."

      I guess the goofballs that programmed that alert didn't decide to give the person a chance to confirm the decision to send the alert.

    31. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Especially since the all-clear with no prior would be obviously incorrect.

      But you wouldn't know whether there wasn't a nuclear war or there wasn't a tsunami.

      Ever seen a fire alarm button? There's a reason it's one button and not 27.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Given the history of the Cold War, it's a little disturbing that they didn't have a "sorry, that was a false alarm" message already formally prepared.

      It might be disturbing if this was the system to launch a retaliatory strike rather than a warning to take cover but nobody is dumb enough to think that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    33. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      they can periodically create mass panic

      Well I suppose twice just about counts as periodic. The first time you change the password. The second time you install an actual physical switch.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But you wouldn't know whether there wasn't a nuclear war or there wasn't a tsunami.

      I'm sure I won't care if it's a lot of things that won't kill me.

      Ever seen a fire alarm button? There's a reason it's one button and not 27.

      I have. I also note there is a slot in the bottom to clear the alarm if the glass has been broken accidentally. There's also a panel at the building entry to kill the alarm from another place if it goes off inadvertently. And most larger buildings that have fire alarms also have intercom systems allowing security to inform people if the alarm has been triggered by accident.

      Thanks, you picked a really good example.

    35. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      It is a good question. Its seems like some version of "All Clear" would have been a foreseeable need. Even is said "all clear" message is just that and not one to specifically address a prior alert having gone out in error, it still seems like you would/could immediately send the "all clear" to get most people to stop panicking and than clarify the original message went out in error on other channels.

      A lot of people are commenting why doesn't this have more safety mechanisms, why is their no multi-party authorization needed etc. When we are talking about a disaster where there is only seconds between detection and catastrophic event that does not give people much time to respond. Anything that could introduce any delay in notifications going out SHOULD be considered unacceptable!

      When you can't risk putting in technical controls thought that just makes the "people and process" elements that much more critical. At a minimum there should be frequent training / simulation both for new and veteran operators. That should include running the scenario beyond the initial alert goes out. There really should have been a run-book for "crisis over and we seem to be still alive" even if not perfectly adapted to actual events that would have provided some guidance on what to do which would have allowed someone to do something substantive toward fixing the glitch in less than 38min time.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    36. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's also a panel at the building entry to kill the alarm from another place if it goes off inadvertently.

      Tell me, does that panel have a key? Do the alarms?

      Seems it's designed to be easy to activate, but more difficult to deactivate.

      And most larger buildings that have fire alarms also have intercom systems allowing security to inform people if the alarm has been triggered by accident.

      Not even sure if that's true. I've never seen it. And it'd be pretty stupid, actually. Think disgruntled employee.

      Thanks, you picked a really good example.

      True, but not for the reason you think.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    37. Re:Why did it take 40 minutes to correct? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      1 minute to send the original message.
      1 minute to try to restart the sending process, except it hasn't stopped.
      1 minute to get into a tangle of deadlocks & fork bombs.
      37 minutes trying to get the log files into a readable state in order to work out that the above happened.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. So wrong. Clickbait headline. by Woldscum · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Fake 'Inbound Missile' Alert Sent To Every Cellphone in Hawaii." Fake News Headline. 100% real and legit warnings were sent. Just no missile. Clickbait Bullshit.

    1. Re:So wrong. Clickbait headline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at a loss as to why someone thinks your accurate comment is flamebait.

  8. . . . and the other buttons . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, they have a button programmed to broadcast a missile attack, and the operator "hit it by mistake."

    So what other alert buttons are pre-programmed on the board . . . ?

    "GIANT TUNA DEVOURING BEACH VISITORS!"

    "AI POWERED SLINKY ARMY ATTACKING PASSENGER CARS!"

    And, of course, worst of all:

    "HAWAII DECLARED TO BE A SHITHOLE!"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:. . . and the other buttons . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the "Planet now hot, you are flooded" button

    2. Re:. . . and the other buttons . . . ? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      "IMMINENT COVFEFE! STAND BY!"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:. . . and the other buttons . . . ? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I see your list omitted the Sharknado. . . . are you trying to be funny or something? ;D

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re: . . . and the other buttons . . . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently true. But to buy something with my debit card, I have to enter my pin, verify the amount and then authorize the transaction.

  9. Obligatory... by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  10. The government shouldn't have everyone's number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government shouldn't have everyone's number. They should definitely not have such a tool of powerful propaganda and fear in everyone's pockets.

    Capcha: disquiet

    1. Re:The government shouldn't have everyone's number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes and no. Yes, they can easily get a list of everyone's number, but no, it is a little more difficult to locate each individual number at any given time.

      Instead, the broadcasts are sent based on connected tower. Think of it just like a broadcast packet on a LAN Subnet. Phones connected to the particular towers (in this case, literally every single tower in the state) received the message.

      This is also pretty much the same system the AMBER alter system uses.

    2. Re:The government shouldn't have everyone's number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you don't need everyones number for these sort of broadcast alerts, hell your phone doesn't even have to be connected, as long as it can receive the broadcast towers signal it should display the alert.

  11. Trump is trying to create... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a problem in Korea where there has never been one before?

    1. Re:Trump is trying to create... by greenwow · · Score: 2

      One of my first memories was in 1950 when the communists in NK invaded the south and the UN voted on a resolution against them. Did you forget almost 70 years of history?

    2. Re: Trump is trying to create... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see they forgot to teach history at your school. Poor bastard. You are doomed to repeat it.

    3. Re: Trump is trying to create... by kenh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Trump is trying to create... a problem in Korea where there has never been one before?

      You can't be that stupid.

      Ever heard of the Korean War? They made a tv show about it called M.A.S.H., it was quite popular.

      There was also a movie, called Team America, that explored some of the issues involved with North Korea.

      Every president since Eisenhower has had to deal with a "North Korea Problem", even Obama, the difference is Trump isn't trying to bribe North Korea to get them to pretend to suspend their nuclear weapons efforts...

      --
      Ken
    4. Re: Trump is trying to create... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your memory is clouded by western propaganda as far back as you can remember? SAD.

    5. Re: Trump is trying to create... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Progressive millennials, if they didn't experience history in-person then it didn't happen.

    6. Re: Trump is trying to create... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please elaborate. Other than engaging in name-calling in the media and on twitter, what exactly is Trump doing in regards to North Korea that differs in any notable amount from the previous administration?

  12. This one was by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Did any other state get a similar warning? No? Then how was it not a state deal? If the feds has messed up we all would have gotten a notice on our phones, or at least some other part of the U.S.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:This one was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would make perfect sense for the federal government or military to coordinate an exercise (gone wrong) in the single state significantly more likely to be targeted by a certain nuclear threat, as opposed to broadcasting emergency alerts about it across the country. They do exercises for this kind of thing all the time, and telling Washington DC to take cover wouldn't do anything for the citizens in Hawaii.

      The EMA seems to be taking responsibility for this, so probably a state thing after all, but just because you didn't hear about a (defunct) emergency in your own state wouldn't indicate state involvement over federal.

    2. Re:This one was by omnichad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or, this was real but neutralized and then disavowed with a cover story.

      I'm pretty sure the feds wouldn't send a nationwide alert for a localized threat. Initiating mass panic is dangerous enough over a small area.

    3. Re:This one was by cavreader · · Score: 1

      A cover story for a single missile that was neutralized may be feasible. However, there is no way in hell a US retaliatory response could be hidden by a cover story.

    4. Re:This one was by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Something tells me this isn't the first missile we've neutralized (shooting down a missile that has no chance of reaching the US is just good defense practice). But to retaliate means to acknowledge it. Pretending it never happened would be a huge blow to KJU's ego. All of this is wild speculation, of course.

    5. Re:This one was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NK's nuclear missile threat is really no threat at all to the US. Blowing up a few crude nuclear devices underground and a couple of missiles theoretically capable of reaching the US is not an existential threat to the US. Every nuclear capable country with the ability to launch accurate ICBM's required numerous above ground nuclear and missile testing. France had to blow up half of the South Pacific before they figured out how to use the technology they pilfered from the other nuclear powers of the day. Thinking NK has some how mastered the technology without comprehensive testing is a little absurd. And it is still unknown whether or not NK has figured out how to arm one of their missiles with a nuclear warhead let alone figure out the MIRV technologies used by the other major nuclear powers. NK nuclear threats consist of possibly delivering a nuke by ship and detonating in a shipping port and selling any functional nuclear weapons to anyone able to pay.

    6. Re:This one was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't not retaliating be a huge blow to the Orange One's ego?

      Trump's ego is so fragile that he had to boast about having a bigger nuclear button on his desk, despite not actually having a nuclear button at all because that isn't the way the US's launch system is set up.

    7. Re:This one was by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If there was a failed nuclear strike from NK and you were a military leader, would you tell the commander-in-chief? I would expect a fair bit of mutiny for any intelligent patriot in order to save the world.

    8. Re:This one was by cwatts · · Score: 1

      Plus, our idiot president's predecessor is a Hawaiian. Saying "fuck you obama" in this manner is just about something one could expect from 45.

      --
      chris watts íë¦ìS ì(TM)ì
    9. Re:This one was by rhazz · · Score: 1

      Or, this was real but neutralized and then disavowed with a cover story.

      Except that the US isn't the only one with the ability to detect missile launches. Japan is often the first to identify a missile launch because the missiles tend to fly right past them.

    10. Re:This one was by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not that I believe it really happened, but there might be a strong interest globally in pretending it never happened. For one, it is probably the best retaliation against NK.

    11. Re:This one was by rhazz · · Score: 1

      probably the best retaliation against NK.

      I agree, but it wouldn't work. NK would then use the same strategy against Trump and it would be 100x more effective.

  13. Real but a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It Saab t a "fake akert" out was a real alert but out was a mistake.

    Editor's,/. Editor's, words matter...please take an English course or 2 before posting anything else.

    1. Re:Real but a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked up "irony" in the dictionary, and it just had these two sentences.

  14. In addition.. by Ayano · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny part is that there was a prompt for "are you sure?"

    --
    I don't read AC
    1. Re:In addition.. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Funny part is that there was a prompt for "are you sure?"

      The thing is, like all state of the art systems of this sort, it's run on NT or Win95, so Clippy is involved.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:In addition.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You have stated you are not sure you want this message to go out. Do you want to cancel the message? [OK] [Cancel]"

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  15. Real not fake...mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It wasn't a "fake alert" it was a real alert from the real Agency empowered to issue them, that's way worse than a "fake" one.

    It was a mistake... That's not the same as being "fake", words matter. Editor's please take some English classes before posting any more.

    1. Re:Real not fake...mistake by Mal-2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed, it was a false alert, not a fake one.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:Real not fake...mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a "fake alert" it was a real alert from the real Agency empowered to issue them, that's way worse than a "fake" one.

      It was a mistake... That's not the same as being "fake", words matter. Editor's please take some English classes before posting any more.

      Agreed. The main thing, however, is to improve their process. We still want them to be able to issue an alert fast, likely using preprogrammed messages like this apparently was, but may need a little more work to prevent accidental without impeding this.

      Additionally, I think they need to be able to send out an arbitrary message within say 5 minutes of the original, such as a correction or simply more information that is needed.

      If they can improve those two issues, then the false alarm is probably worth it.

    3. Re:Real not fake...mistake by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      English usage nowadays is worse than malapropisms. People are laughed at for using rarely used synonyms ("LOL, look at this Thesaurus guy").

      I hate every bit of Western culture that elevates so called "common" man. I want to live in a world where people need to have some kind of exam before getting access to the Internet, before that stupid Eternal September thing.

      I miss classes. Not classes at school. Classes in Marxist definition. I want to receive a formal acknowledgement for being a Ph.D. from plumbers and waiters. I want them to take of their stupid baseball hats when they see me while I respond with dismissive acknowledgment of their existence.

      I hate egalitarianism. I am not equal to you, dumbass that was flanking high school just few years ago.

      No sarcasm. I am tired living in a consumer society.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:Real not fake...mistake by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Editor's please take some English classes

      Ooops

    5. Re:Real not fake...mistake by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      dumbass that was flanking high school

      Are you talking about army tactics or Rugby Union?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Real not fake...mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      English usage nowadays is worse than malapropisms. People are laughed at for using rarely used synonyms ("LOL, look at this Thesaurus guy").

      I hate every bit of Western culture that elevates so called "common" man. I want to live in a world where people need to have some kind of exam before getting access to the Internet, before that stupid Eternal September thing.

      I miss classes. Not classes at school. Classes in Marxist definition. I want to receive a formal acknowledgement for being a Ph.D. from plumbers and waiters. I want them to take of their stupid baseball hats when they see me while I respond with dismissive acknowledgment of their existence.

      I hate egalitarianism. I am not equal to you, dumbass that was flanking high school just few years ago.

      No sarcasm. I am tired living in a consumer society.

      I miss people who knew the difference between “of” and “off,” and who bothered to check their writing BEFORE posting remarks about how much fucking better they are than everyone else for allegedly having been awarded a “Piled higher and Deeper” degree.

      Having memorized by rote other people’s ideas doesn’t make you any “better,” than other people, you fucking snob, so on behalf of all the plumbers and waiters of the world, all of whom are more useful than you, you can take your hoist-toity little degree, and shove it up your hoity-toity little ass.

  16. I was there... by bobcardone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On the 24th floor of a Waikiki Beach condo balcony having coffee when the alert came on my cell. First reaction...WTF?? Second reaction... went straight to the roof. If it's gonna go down, I want to see it (if only for a few milliseconds).

    --
    What, me worry?
    1. Re:I was there... by msauve · · Score: 2

      Good for you. If you're going to die, why suffer?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re: I was there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know if you had hid someplace and it did hit, you may have been a survivable distance away but standing on the roof nearly guarantees youâ(TM)ll get a wallop of radiation though maybe not enough to take you out.

      Kim Jong Unâ(TM)s missiles are not the highest yielding or the most accurate.

    3. Re:I was there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's similar to looking into the sun, so you would have been blinded if it actually happened.

    4. Re: I was there... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The closest Hiroshima survivor was in a cellar only 300 m from ground zero -- which is very close when you consider that the bomb was detonated at 500 m altitude.

      Now the device North Korea tested back in September was 10x to 20x more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb, but still if a bomb were detonated over Pearl Harbor and you were standing on the beach in Waikiki, you'd almost certainly survive, albeit possibly with thermal burns.

      Here's the thing about all that Duck and Cover stuff from the 50s: when you're talking about a handful of bombs distributed over the entire country, diving under a picnic blanket actually makes sense. It wont' help you if you're at ground zero, but if you're five miles away or so it could make the difference between surviving uninjured or requiring hospital treatment. Multiply that by tens of thousands of people, and duck and cover type education is a sensible defensive strategy.

      There is, however, a simple counter: attack with a lot more warheads. By the early 70s the Soviets had something like 25,000 of them. An all-out attack would not only result in multiple bombs falling on every city, it would guarantee the collapse of American society and a short and hellish existence for anyone unlucky enough to survive. Fatalism makes sense in that scenario. You might as well enjoy the show for a few hundred milliseconds and then die.

      That's not where we are with a North Korean nuclear attack, not by a long shot. North Korea's arsenal is not large enough yet to cause the collapse of American society, or even to kill the majority of people in a city like Honolulu. So maybe we should be dusting off those old civil defense films.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:I was there... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      This needs an app. Something that can broadcast to a website for the rest of the world for say an hour.
      Spare laptop with web cam, other spare cellphone that can pointed out a window after such an alert.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:I was there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever consider that you might not be at ground zero? Either due to the guidance not being accurate enough or deliberate targeting of somewhere else? In this case you've got a good chance of survival inside and less of a chance outside.

      If Pearl harbour had been the target (and had been hit accurately) you have a reasonable chance of surviving the initial blast in Waikiki.

      Look at http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?&kt=10&lat=21.3545952&lng=-157.9493138&hob_opt=1&hob_psi=5&hob_ft=2207&fallout=1&zm=13 for a nice simulation of the effects. I do wonder how many hits this site got in the last day?

    7. Re: I was there... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      North Korea's arsenal is not large enough yet to cause the collapse of American society, or even to kill the majority of people in a city like Honolulu. So maybe we should be dusting off those old civil defense films.

      Hiroshima was ~350k people and 90-146k people were killed by a 16kt nuke. Wikipedia says Honolulu itself has 377k inhabitants and North Korea's latest test was probably around 250kt, so unless Honolulu is vastly more spread out I'd say it only takes one. Maybe it wouldn't take out the majority of the million or so living in the metro area but you'd probably be more than halfway to the total WW2 losses. And the greatest loss of civilians since the Civil War.

      That said, Honolulu is probably mostly a psychological threat and money sink for the US to create an anti-missile system that'll never be used and create opposition to a war with North Korea. Their biggest hostage is Seoul which is a dense city with 10-25 million people (city/metro) right across the border. They can throw a barrage of artillery and small short range missiles at it, if one has a nuke and that gets through millions will die. And if that happens the war will never be a success, even if it's a military victory.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re: I was there... by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. The radius of destructive effect rises as the 2/3 power of yield. That's because the energy is dissipated in a three dimensional volume, and you're calculating the radius of intersection of that volume with a two dimensional surface. TL;DR: 20x the yield equals 7x the destructive radius.

      Anyhow you can look up on the expected fatal radius by bomb type and yield, and the immediately fatal thermal effects of the warhead NK tested for an unprotected individual would be less than 5 miles, although many closer would survive because of shelter. Honolulu is about 12 miles across. If you put the warhead in the geographic center of the city to maximize casualties a lot of people on either end will survive. A lot of them will be uninjured too. The 5 psi blast radius is only three miles, outside that radius even residential buildings will still stand and people shaded by them will likely escape uninjured if they can get inside before the fallout.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. Raised the Bar by BeemanIT · · Score: 1

    Today a Swatting tomorrow a MISSLE ATTACK!!!!

  18. Shitty wat to wake up by surfcow · · Score: 2

    Hope I never read a message like that again.

    Didn't last long, but people were running red lights, etc.

    Friends were trying to decide which of their children to save.

    1. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      Friends were trying to decide which of their children to save.

      Save them how, exactly?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      Or was it which ones to get rid of?

    3. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bring them to shelter. People have survived nuclear attacks before, no doubt they will in the future as well. If you avoid being killed by the initial blast and radiation you want to shelter from the fallout, most of which fades in two weeks.

      Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

      Fallout Protection - What to Know and Do about Nuclear Attack

      Nuclear Strike Drills Faded Away In The 1980s. It May Be Time To Dust Them Off

      Nuclear weapons and their effects operate according to the laws of physics, not magic. The physics, effects, and countermeasures are known.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re: Shitty wat to wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You save them by hiding under a picnic blanket, duh.

    5. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      The shelters from the "Cold War" may have been reused in many buildings for parking, storage, converted to other use, the building might have been replaced by a new building with no new shelter.
      Private shelters from the cold war had design limitations given the idea was to sell owners on bunker not design a bunker for different locations.
      The land the 1950/60 shelter got placed into might not have been well prepared and by 2018 that shelter might have cracked, moved, failed. Soil conditions and what water would do to under a bunker was not often considered by people motivated to sell a lot of bunkers to consumers.
      A lot of people in a city do not have the needed land outside a city or a yard to build their own shelter in.
      They might know of a good company to build one but not have the land for a $20,000 to $1000000 walk in or drive in bunker.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by gravewax · · Score: 1

      even North Korean's current low end nuke estimates are an order of magnitude larger than Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it isn't realistic to compare the chances of survival against that. Also any sizable nuclear war it won't be the fallout or the bomb that is the killer problem anyway, it will be the nuclear winter brought about by the fires.

    7. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by nmb3000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really liked this TED talk about it: Surviving a Nuclear Attack.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    8. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It seems to me you have a few things wrong there. There will still be survivors of an attack by a 150kt nuclear warhead, it just becomes more difficult or less likely as you get closer to the explosion. But ultimately you are going to reach an area where the force of the explosion attenuates to the point it is no longer a major threat (a cube root function) The same goes for larger warheads. Next, it is reasonable to doubt that North Korea has enough warheads to cause nuclear winter. Finally, there seems to be reason to doubt that North Korea will be allowed to progress much further in developing its combined nuclear warheads and long range missiles. I doubt that President Trump will stand for it, and he has already launched missiles at another country that was transgressing.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:Shitty wat to wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have any kind of home that's not a tent or a car then you have by definition a shelter and the easiest is to use that.
      I would fill the bathtub if there's one, cover some openings with wet towels and blankets. Food isn't even strictly needed if waiting out a few days/weeks makes it a lot safer (or perhaps wait for some wind and rain to wash stuff away).
      I would hope to be with one or more people, and have a pack of cards.

  19. Re:Accident my ass... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    Hanlon's Razor.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  20. Inquiring minds want to know by iamacat · · Score: 1

    So say I get similar alert in my home in CA. Don't have any basement, have one bathtub where children can fit. How do I maximize chances of long term survival? Stay in the house or in the car which at least has a partial metal envelope?

    1. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I grew up in the 60s and 70s. I remember some of the cold war films they showed us in school. According to them:

      Stay indoors. If you’re close enough to the blast, you’re probably dead anyway (that was mostly just implied). For many more people, though, fallout is going to be the main worry - so stay inside. And even if you still have running water... you probably shouldn’t drink it. Use what’s already in the back of the toilet and in your hot water heater.

      Of course nowadays, post 9/11, most reservoirs are supposedly covered - so I have no idea if that’s as important.

      In any case, water is probably going to be the main short term issue. If you have some pre-blast warning, filling up as many containers as possible with water is a good idea.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re: Inquiring minds want to know by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      The house has multiple walls, and a larger surface area to absorb the damage. It is also more likely to stay in place. Aside from a direct hit, or radiation fallout, or a chemical or biological weapon, you should survive inside the house.

      The automobile has little to maintain its position, just four tires. It wasn't designed to withstand extreme conditions. The windows can be shattered, and the frame can crumple on top of you. Few vehicles are strong enough to survive such extre conditions.

    3. Re: Inquiring minds want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bathtub. You fill it up.

      The biggest threat from fallout is the gamma radiation. Just to reduce exposure by half, you would need a roof comprised of 2.5 inches of concrete. If it wasnâ(TM)t for the open (windy) structure, a parking garage in the middle to lower levels would suffice.

      Basically, a standard home further down-wind isnâ(TM)t going to do fuck all to help. You will get a nasty dose of potentially fatal radiation.

    4. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Iodine?

      Since most if not all Iodine isotopes have half life measured in days or hours, you don't need to block iodine update for a long time.

      You need to flood your body with iodine, so that any radioactive iodine that is ingested is excreted out again, instead of being accumulated in the thyroid.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to empty the fridge

    6. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Duck and cover, mocked endlessly, is a good way to react. If you are close enough either the radiation or the blast will kill you outright, but that's a pretty small area (particularly when its a maybe 20kt fission weapon from Korea, probably with an impact trigger). Otherwise, your biggest danger is from the flying debris. Ducking out of the way of flying glass and getting under some substantial cover to avoid falling roofs and ceilings will certainly raise your odds of getting through it.

    7. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative

      Baby boomer here. I remember when they taught this shit in school. Stay in your house, away from windows, keep curtains drawn. Have a battery radio and fill up containers with drinking water.

      There are multiple ways for a nuclear strike to kill you: ionizing radiation burn, pressure wave, thermal radiation burn, firestorm, and fallout. Each has its own characteristic radius within which you will probably die from it, but your chances are improved by being inside.

      You car would be a bad idea for many reasons unless it is in a garage. If your car is outside it will get quickly covered with very hot short-lived radioactive fallout. The gamma rays will cut through your car like it wasn't even there. You want physical distance to cut down your radiation dose until the hottest isotopes decay. The area in which the fallout will kill you quickly actually begins to contract after only an hour or so, even though the fallout is spreading. The area in which short exposures to fallout represents a health risk starts to drop after a day.

      Get inside, stay inside, listen on the radio for the all clear.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Start with what you have and build on that.
      Store some food and water to start with.
      If the home is yours and you can get planning approval consider an approved Root cellar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... design
      If you have land, got gov approval and can hire an expert consider some of the much smaller bunker designs. They are turn key, functional and don't cost millions of $.
      Stay in the house. Have water and food set aside.
      The time after will be like the movie The Road https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... .

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You really want to do some preparation since your situation improves considerably with it. Neither a standard wood frame house nor car is going to be much protection if you are in them, and remember the radiation would come from above as well. You want to be in the shelter for 14 days if possible to allow the radiation levels to drop. If possible you want to get at least a meter of soil between you and the radiation - in all directions, including above you. The radiation will be the worst at the beginning and then fall off over time.

      If nothing else, you could dig a trench and park the car over it. Ideally the engine would be over you, and you could put sandbags on the floor.

      Maybe you want to peruse the following.

      General background is here:
      Fallout Protection - What to Know and Do about Nuclear Attack
      FEMA TR-87 Standards for Fallout Shelters

      Plans for Expedient Fallout Shelters
      Below Ground Corrugated Steel Culvert Shelter Model

      There are, of course, companies that sell shelters.

      You might even be able to use something like this for a starter, just put about 3+ feed of earth around / above it.

      SafRoom 8 ft. x 8 ft. x 7 ft. Steel Tornado Shelter
      8 ft. x 7 ft. 14 Person Underground Tornado Storm Shed

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    10. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Get inside, stay inside, listen on the radio for the all clear.

      Presuming your radio survives the EMP.

      The radio station, particularly AM station, stands a better chance of surviving because in many cases, the transmitter amplifiers are still closet-sized tube amplifiers. Of course the studio will probably get toasted, but it's easier to work around that than it is to work around a tens-of-kilowatts amplifier going up in smoke.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    11. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by hey! · · Score: 2

      Depends on the altitude of the blast. EMP is primarily produced by the interaction of gamma rays with the upper atmosphere. A single large warhead detonated at an altitude calculated for maximum casualties would almost certainly NOT produce the kind of EMP effects lazy thriller writers have taught the public are an inevitable part of any nuclear attack.

      I know this because I've critiqued a number of science fiction manuscripts, and the "huge bomb creates the end of technological civilization" scenario is so popular as an inciting incident in crummy manuscripts that I actually did the research that the authors didn't do. The optimal profile for an EMP attack is a large number of small, non-thermonuclear atomic warheads detonated well above the stratosphere. This is not to say there would be *no* EMP effects of a ground level burst, but they're likely to affect long conductors like transmission lines, not the printed circuit traces in a transistor radio.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CDC recommends having 3 days supply of bottled water on hand and that you replace the bottles every year or at least check the expiration on them.

      I bought some bottled water after Trump was elected...

    13. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Get a new president. Best way to survive a nuclear blast is to not have one.

    14. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Oh, the car. Being right next to a reservoir of combustible liquid is a total win when there's a huge flash of thermal radiation.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The effects of an emp are related to the length of the wire subjected to the magnetic field. A handheld device, probably going to be fine. Something connected to a grid of thousands of miles of wire, not so much.

    16. Re:Inquiring minds want to know by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      What about devices with antennas roughly a meter long? This describes an awful lot of radios, which were my specific concern.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  21. Intern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wounder if the same intern who gave the names som ting wong, wei to low, ho lee fuk, bang dig ow pushed the butten,

    If so he has a great carrea in commedy

  22. A good wake up call by aberglas · · Score: 1

    This may have been the result of minor incompetence, but there is major incompetence happening further west.

    We ignore North Korea and China at our peril. They will soon have capability to reach Hawaii. Then what will we do when they start attacking S. Korea? Nothing that is what. Cannot endanger Hawaii.

    And anti missile missiles are only partially effective. They would need to be near 100% to risk it.

    Sure, we could retaliate, but remember, N. Korea need not act rationally.

    1. Re: A good wake up call by kenh · · Score: 1

      We ignore North Korea and China at our peril. They will soon have capability to reach Hawaii. Then what will we do when they start attacking S. Korea? Nothing that is what.Cannot endanger Hawaii.

      Bomb the launch sites? You know we have bombs the size of railroad cars that we can drop on their military installations - they impact a 1 mile radius area, as isis learned a little while ago... what's it called, the "Mother Of All Bombs"?

      --
      Ken
  23. Wait....wut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one damn comment so far that the Hawaiian Emergency Management Administrator is Mr. Miyagi? Wax on Wax off!

  24. Hey! by msauve · · Score: 0

    Welcome to earlier today!

    This isn't news, it's "olds."

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Hey! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      That's OK, it hasn't been discussed here till now . That discussions is part of the magic of Slashdot.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  25. I hope they gathered useful data from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    social experiment.

  26. You can see the timeline and offical actions below by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  27. Not much of a timeline by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although interesting to see what happened after "the wrong button was pressed", I would still love to know more about how such a terribly incorrect action could be triggered so easily with no outside verification. Like the governor doesn't even get one minute to verify and cancel a state-wide alert?

    I know time is of the essence in these things but it just seems crazy a shift change could trigger this, and in a way crazier that if that was possible, it never happened before. It seems pretty obvious something must have changed recently to allow this to happen, what was that?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Not much of a timeline by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      It was probably a system test. Those need to be done to see how the thing actually works. Must be fascinating to collect and study data on people's responses.

    2. Re: Not much of a timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But next time they won't react the same.

    3. Re: Not much of a timeline by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I agree it was a system test, but they probably do those regularly - again I'm really wondering, how come this has not happened before? There is some kind of story here.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. Re: The government shouldn't have everyone's numbe by kenh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why do you imagine that the only way the message could be sent to every phone is to have a list of all phone numbers? I suspect the system relies on beacon signals broadcast from cell towers that every cellphone within range picks up, displays the message, then stores a record of the alert for a pre determined period of time (24 hours), after which the alert is ignored.

    Do you really imagine the system sends out several million simultaneous text messages? Why just send a message to every device within range?

    --
    Ken
  29. good by hdyoung · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There should be more of this in the US. Lots more. In fact, we should reinstate bi-yearly air raid drills for schools and businesses. For everyone within 100 miles of a strategically important target. That would be 95% of the population I bet. Remember that the nukes are wayyyyyy more powerful nowadays? It needs to be made perfectly clear to the US population that if our great leader pops his top and starts a nuclear confrontation, people have a 10% chance of survival, and that's only IF they manage to get to a shelter. A ton of people in this country have forgotten that the world is connected. They think that they can just ignore the rest of the world and they will be fine. Personally, I think that a lot of this has to do with the fact that WW2 is fading into the rearview mirror. Up until the last decade, there were a lot of vets from that war still around. People who were actually in Japan after the bombs and saw it with their own eyes. Lots of people who lost friends and family members fighting overseas. The population generally understood that what happens on the other side of the planet can come home to roost on their own doorsteps. We've largely forgotten this, and we elected an unstable, unqualified, angry leader and put him in charge of the nuclear arsenal. Because hey, we don't really believe anymore that what happens on the other side of the world can actually impinge on our lives in any real way. The entire US population needs a brutal reminder of how small the world actually has become. We all ought to spend some time practicing the soothing art of putting our heads between our legs and kissing our asses goodbye. Let all those conservative rural parents and grandparents spend some time answering awkward questions from the kids about the air raids drills they get at school.

    1. Re: good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree with you, but considering Hilary's email scandal the only same vote was for Trump.

  30. Hmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess imagining the perfect world with nothing that annoys you and supporting an enormous influx of people into your nation who won't be coming to your state or at least your neighborhood has put you into a position (directly created by your own political leanings) where you might have to think about dealing with the consequences of your actions... and now your people panic when things aren't directly coinciding with their accepted level of life as envisioned in the lies you told them, I guess that's not good enough for Democrats any more. Disclaimer: Not that I believe either party is good.

  31. Re: A lie is a bad start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess you're the last to know.

    What we know about North Korea's missile programme

  32. Re: The government shouldn't have everyone's numbe by kenh · · Score: 1

    The government shouldn't have everyone's number. They should definitely not have such a tool of powerful propaganda and fear in everyone's pockets.

    You propose they instead do what, print their alerts about impending danger in the newspaper, but not on the front page - that might scare people?

    --
    Ken
  33. Exercised ? by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Get used to it. In a year UnKim will have re-entry.
    Imagine Kim is drunk, time to troll Hawaii....
    Kimmie wants a raise, time to troll Hawaii, Alaska, NYC
    Kimmie just enjoys a good laugh

    After all Pops made a good living at it and there only bonuses....

  34. I didn't hit snooze this morning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got me out of bed quick and I turned on the pumps to put water in the mauka tanks just in case. Within five minutes it seemed like a false alarm as there was nothing on the radio and no sirens. The alert went to cellphones and TV only. But it was an interesting 30 minutes.

     

  35. At least now they might take this threat seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump, Obama and a string of presidents before them really dropped the ball on this one. So has the federal government whose "experts" reassured them NK wouldn't have the capability for 25 years or some such bullshit. How could they possibly know that? Not even NK knows that! They made a number up and had "confidence" in it.

    How about some heavy pressure on China to take care of this once and for all? Turn it into China for all I care. Or strike a deal with SK. Everyone loves capitalism right?

    Because China if NK ever fires a live missile let alone a nuke then all bets are off: American tanks *WILL* roll into Bejing.

    So pull your head out your ass and fix this shit ok?

    Best wishes, Slashdot

  36. Re: The government shouldn't have everyone's numbe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computers have been fast enough to generate every possible phone number for decades.

    But yeah, you can get these alerts even if you phone says "no service" too. Though not always. If there's a tower around you will even if they won't serve you.

  37. Impact trigger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes you think NK would use an impact trigger instead of some sort of barometric trigger to create an air blast?

  38. Was It A Big Red Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how big was it?

  39. Re:Accident my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who think Hanlon's Razor is some sort of universal law are stupid.

  40. Not only incompetent in Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the November 2017 wine country firestorms, I literally watched the approaching firestorm with nary a peep or warning...not a fire siren, emergency text, nor nothing...apparently to allow first responders to respond without panicked civilians blocking their way, even though it was midnight on a Sunday. As a wall of fucking flames hundreds of feet tall and miles wide approached. Which explains why the old and infirmed died, i.e. they couldn't run fast enough.
    Moral of the story: You're on your fucking own.

  41. This is so colossally bad as to be irrecoverable. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I can only hope that the real need for a use for this never actually arises, because if it does, the fact that this goofup happened is going to cause people to not take any real one as seriously, and people will die who might not have if they had heeded the warning.

  42. Re:Accident my ass... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    It's not a universal law, it's a methodological tool for critical thinking. Like Occam's razor, it encourages you to include no more assumptions than you have evidence for.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  43. Re:This is so colossally bad as to be irrecoverabl by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

    I don't know, people can wrap their heads around fucking up once. A second such incident would probably have the result you mentioned, though.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  44. Re:This is so colossally bad as to be irrecoverabl by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I hope you're right...

    Although I hope even more that we never need to find out.

  45. Re:False alarm Trump hasn't brought us to nuclear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, I have Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers all over my social media trying to somehow pin this on Drumpf. Imagine living like that, in a state of constant anger and fear and hatred.

    I guess it's because the regressive letists have nothing left, which is why they're so violent and always calling for censorship and violence against people who disagree with them. Nothing but self-hate, failure, cuckoldry, racism, islam, pedofilia, socialism, and losing. Losers.

  46. Not every cellphone. Only allegedly "smart" ones by jabberw0k · · Score: 2

    Feature phones like most flip-phones are not equipped with this protocol, so folks like me with a Samsung T-219 for example are blissfully unaware of all this silliness. At some point I gather the cell towers will require me to get a new device, but so far I can't find a new mobile telephone with real buttons, no web, and no camera; most confusing.

  47. Re: A lie is a bad start by oobayly · · Score: 2

    FALSE. NK missles have gone a bit over Japan. There is zero indication they have the technology to hit anything besides the ocean.

    FALSE. The missiles were a lot more than a bit over Japan, in one case the apogee was 4,500km. An ICBM will generally have an apogee of about 1,200km, so by flattening the trajectory the range can be greatly increased.

    South Korea’s Yonhap news agency says that during its 53 minutes flight time, the missile soared some 4500km into space — that’s 10 times higher than the orbit of the International Space Station.
    Defence analysts say this demonstrates it has the power and range of a fully functional ICBM capable of travelling more than 10,000km - putting all of the United States mainland and most of the world within its reach.

    http://www.news.com.au/world/a...

  48. Re:At least now they might take this threat seriou by Cederic · · Score: 1

    American tanks *WILL* roll into Bejing.

    Oh please. Dream on.

    America could possibly beat China in an all-out war (and tanks driving into Beijing would require an all-out war) but the only way the US will be driving tanks into Beijing is if they've already levelled it with nukes first.

    The US just isn't going to win a conventional war against China in China.

  49. Re:At least now they might take this threat seriou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The US just isn't going to win a conventional war against China in China.

    The US isn't going to win a conventional war against China in or out of China (Judging by the Korean war). It's not. going to win a nuclear war either, given M.A.D.

  50. MOD PARENT -1, troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all it couldn't be a public employee of a Democrat run state that made a mistake, because as we know all public employees are paragons of virtue unlike those dreadful people who work in the private sector for...

    PROFIT!!!

    Begone, troll.

    On the off chance you were serious... if someone bumps into you on the sidewalk, or rear ends your car at a stoplight, or mistakenly gives you another customer’s laundry, are you really so fucking stupid as to conflate the ability to make a mistake with someone’s political affiliation?

    Just by contrast, Michigan’s REPUBLICAN (not to put too fine a point on it) government POISONED an entire town full of AMERICAN CITIZENS, killing some, and permanently harming others. Suddenly, a false alarm doesn’t seem like such a giant, catastrophic FUCK-UP, now does it.

    Or does shoehorning everyone into neat little cubbyholes make the world easier for your tiny little mind to understand? If so, i pity you. I recommend travel, preferably international. Mark Twain said that THAT is fatal to prejudice... oh, sorry... Mark Twain was an author, which means he WROTE stuff... books and such; also he was a humorist. (It wasn’t his real name, I understand, it was a nom de plume, but you hopefully get my point. If you had difficulty reading this, get an adult to help you.)

    1. Re: MOD PARENT -1, troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are talking about flint, itâ(TM)s been ran by Democrats for years. But I agree that incompetence isnâ(TM)t limited to any partyâ(TM)s. Both share it equally well.

  51. Addendum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Addendum: from now on, asshole, get your own shit from the kitchen, and unclog your own fucking toilet.

  52. Re:Not every cellphone. Only allegedly "smart" one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of the alert, my iPhone nagged me again with the "setup apple pay" screen. Took me 40min to finally rid myself of it. By that time it was all over. Don't know which is worse, fearful that you are about to die, or enraged over shitty UI design.

  53. Australians love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some Australian family are now on the front page of the Sydney Morning Herald; crying about their holiday got interrupted due to the threat of nuclear warfare.

    It is hilarious to read what these millennial snowflakes think of this 38
    second horn, and the utter devastation it has caused to their plans area.

  54. Tom Ridge and Bush's terrorist color codes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge who resigned his job under the Bush administration? Years later Ridge wrote in his book that he was pressured to change the terrorist warning color-code system for purely domestic political purposes.

    But of course, Ridge worked for an administration run by a torturing war criminal -- that could never happen again, right?

    I'd guess the odds are far, far better than even that this "accident" is merely a propaganda stunt to hype up the fear of North Korea.

  55. Re: The government shouldn't have everyone's numbe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a cell phone from the mainland, and was in Hawaii at the time. It was a flip phone but it could receive text messages. I did not get a text message for this alert.

  56. On top of their tweets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency tweeted there was no threat

    what's this fucking shit, why don't they send a fucking ALL CLEAR TEXT!!!!!!!

  57. Re:False alarm Trump hasn't brought us to nuclear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Nothing but self-hate, failure, cuckoldry

    What are you talking about? Did you forget to take your meds today? Do you even know what cuckolds are?

  58. Washington also got the memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We also got it in WA while shopping around. I immediately google it to find out it was a false alarm.
     

  59. Simple Solution by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    How about, just like when a company is testing the fire alarms in a building, you ANNOUNCE BEFOREHAND that a TEST will be happening that day. You can just as thoroughly test your system without it being a surprise.

  60. Is this the 2018 equivalent. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . of Leeeeeerrooooyyyyyy Jeeeeeeeeennnnkkkiinnsssss!!!

    (grin)

  61. It's a test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be willing to bet it was a test to see how people would react to such an alert if it were real. The CDC already had a conference on this same subject... preparation for a nuclear attack. Doing it in HI limits the extent of the impact.

  62. Live in Honolulu. by surfcow · · Score: 1

    We live in Honolulu, got the scary message, did not panic,
    immediately attempted to verify its veracity, because
    I DON'T BELIEVE EVERY FUCKING THING I READ ON A PHONE.

    Sure, it was un-nerving as hell to get the message, but I am a skeptic by nature.

    There were no sirens, nothing on the internet, nothing on the local news, no stream of military jets and choppers out of Pearl and KMCB, etc, etc. Nothing. Yawn. Saturday morning.

  63. Re: The government shouldn't have everyone's numbe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it doesn't work on a 2G phone. I wonder if it would have failed on iphone 2G but worked on the dumbest 3G phone, etc.

  64. Re:About 47% of americans hit a wrong button in 20 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    There is nothing Trollish about saying that V.P. Pence would be a theocratic authoritarian but at least I wouldn't be worried about a nuclear war every few days.

    It's just a fact. Like "the sky is blue".

    Trump, during his briefings showed he thinks of Nuclear weapons as merely 'big bombs' and said if we had them we should use them.

    Pence, while governor oversaw laws that required women to pay $1000 to bury their miscarriages to back his religious beliefs. The backlash was so intense had had to back down on that one. Pence is a glorified talk show host who lacks the intellect to qualify for president *but* he's not callous about nuclear weapons, he's not struggling with dementia or sundowner's syndrome, and he doesn't constantly show narcissistic traits nor does he push other leaders out of the way to strut to the front and then stick his chin out like some kind of preening dog.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  65. Best Thing Hawaii Can Do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Succeed from the United States.

    Then everyone will leave them alone and those living on the islands will be safe.

  66. Re: A lie is a bad start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump voters have to carefully avoid sources of information in case they become less stupid.

  67. Re:At least now they might take this threat seriou by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    What?

    How should Trump and Obama have stopped the State of Hawaii from doing this ??

    I'm afraid knee jerk reactions like this is going to enable the bad guys to get away with this.

  68. Re: A lie is a bad start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah keep burning mod points on my jokes.
    You're so much smarter than Trump voters. So smart you lost an easy election.

    I don't vote. I have never seen a worthy candidate ever in my life.

  69. What technology was used? by JIDatiT4C · · Score: 1

    What technology is used for ballistic missile alerts? I guess this one was via the Wireless Emergency Alerts network but what was the over-the-air protocol used?
    The obvious one is the ancient GSM SMS Cell Broadcast standard but do Hawaii networks support this (and its descendants) and do all/most mobiles? Which mobile phone models received it? And which did not? What proportion of users in Hawaii saw this?

  70. Re: A lie is a bad start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely. At its highest the missile was nearly an Earth-radius above the Earth’s surface. That’s really really high, and equates to a lot of potential energy and a large potential range for a future launch with a lower angle (lower apogee, greater range).