Slashdot Mirror


Hawaii Governor Didn't Correct False Missile Alert Sooner Because He Didn't Know His Twitter Password (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader shares a WashingtonPost report: Minutes after the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency mistakenly sent a missile alert at 8:07 a.m. on Jan. 13 -- terrifying residents and visitors across the state -- some officials, such as Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, rushed to Twitter to reassure everyone it was a mistake. But one Twitter account was deafeningly silent for 17 minutes: that of Hawaii Gov. David Ige. Though Ige was informed by the state's adjutant general that the alert was false two minutes after it was sent, he waited until 8:24 a.m. to tweet, "There is NO missile threat." On Monday, after he gave the State of the State address in which he avoided the subject of the missile alert fiasco, reporters demanded an explanation for that long silence. Ige's answer: He couldn't log in to Twitter. "I have to confess that I don't know my Twitter account log-ons and the passwords, so certainly that's one of the changes that I've made," Ige said.

189 comments

  1. Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would he rely exclusively on Twitter when there's an entire industry whose job it is to disseminate information?

    1. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hear hear!
      It's astonishing that he thinks a simple "I forgot my password, teacher" is a proper excuse for failing to inform people that they're NOT about to be nuked into oblivion!

    2. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would have been better to say that he was taking a dump, and was constipated. Everyone would understand that.

    3. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Also, is it necessarily a bad thing that he can't tweet random thoughts that come into his head? Having a staff member do it for him acts as a nice sanity check and brain fart HEPA filter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Why would he rely exclusively on Twitter when there's an entire industry whose job it is to disseminate information?

      When you say "industry", are you referring to those who still broadcast old-fashioned signals to boxes that the cord-cutting generation doesn't use anymore?

      Kind of hard to "disseminate" information to the masses who tend to now recognize only two forms of communication; social media and internet streaming.

    5. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At some point, a communications channel becomes 'official' and 'important'. I would say that when that threshold is crossed, it's a really good idea to have a couple of people involved to ensure every t is crossed and every i is dotted.

      And I also think that the fact that Twitter is considered an emergency communications channel AT ALL is disturbing.

    6. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Local news outlets transmit over the air (TV and radio), plus they have their own online presence as well.

    7. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Local news outlets transmit over the air (TV and radio)....

      TV and radio? You mean Netflix and Spotify?

      ..., plus they have their own online presence as well.

      Those who have invested in an online presence do. And if it's not on a YouTube or Facebook live stream, you might as well be offline.

    8. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by kelemvor4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hear hear! It's astonishing that he thinks a simple "I forgot my password, teacher" is a proper excuse for failing to inform people that they're NOT about to be nuked into oblivion!

      It's more amazing to me that anyone would expect a governor to use twitter to notify people about anything. Government folks shouldn't be using partisan websites to disseminate information, they should be using acceptable and established channels. In other news, the governor of Hawaii still hasn't posted to Slashdot on the matter. Maybe the misses are still inbound.. sheesh.

      He should have issued a quick news conference and or radio broadcast. If it was more important than that, then the Emergency Alert System. That's my opinion.

    9. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This boggles me as well. A channel this critical to communication, in previous decades, would be regulated and well funded, similar to 911 centers. Twitter is more suited for what someone talks about breakfast, or how they are mad at a ref's call during a football game, as opposed to mission-critical communication. Especially for the fact that not everyone follows the governor, or state officials.

    10. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You would not be constipated if there was an impending nuclear missile strike.

    11. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This boggles me as well. A channel this critical to communication, in previous decades, would be regulated and well funded, similar to 911 centers. Twitter is more suited for what someone talks about breakfast, or how they are mad at a ref's call during a football game, as opposed to mission-critical communication. Especially for the fact that not everyone follows the governor, or state officials.

      And then there is a large amount of us who have never even used twitter! Nor see a point.

    12. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by PPH · · Score: 2

      old-fashioned signals to boxes that the cord-cutting generation doesn't use anymore?

      SMS messages and the 'old-fashioned' EAS broadcasts serve only to direct the population to tune to news sources for further information and instructions. It boggles my mind that the people conducting the system test would not have contact information at hand with which they could have announced the mistake. And that people receiving what appeared to be a real alert would not tune to the local news as instructed.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    13. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by PPH · · Score: 1

      And that the 'official' news channel cannot be unilaterally re-prioritized by the carriers to make room for streaming cat videos.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    14. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by rnturn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      BINGO!

      I'm not on Twitter. Neither is anyone else in my family. Because state government wrongly assumes that all its citizens are willing to be interrupted by tweets all day long, those that aren't are just acceptable losses?

      One might assume that DHS and FEMA would have drawn up suggestions for state and local officials on how to deal with emergency notifications like this. But it appears that neither of those organizations seem to be able to do their jobs.

      When we lived in S. OH (many years ago), the entire southern half of the state was paralyzed for almost two weeks due to an ice storm that knocked out power. How did local government inform citizens on the progress of the repairs and when areas might expect power to be restored? They freakin' didn't. The idiots in the public safety department had no plan in place. None. Did they think to pass information along to the local radio stations? Hell no. It was like living a scene out of "Airplane!": "No... that's just what they'd be expecting us to do."

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    15. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by skids · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Besides, what self respecting nuclear aggressor wouldn't simultaneously hack or at least DoS local official's twitter accounts? You think social media is going to stay up in a real war waged by a competent adversary? Nerp. It'll crash at the most critical moment. It isn't defense-hardened, folks.

    16. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by lgw · · Score: 1

      You'd think that e.g. a president of the US could be bothered to carry the little card with him needed to authorize a nuclear strike should things go bad in a hurry. More than a couple of people involved in getting that one right, and yet some recent residents couldn't be bothered. Rather more important than a twitter password (OK, that has me wondering what Trump would tweet as he launched the nukes).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >OK, that has me wondering what Trump would tweet as he launched the nukes

      "Showing little Rocket Man how it's done. I start the best nukular wars, believe me. #MAGA"

    18. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Twitter isn't that popular. Especially for emergency information. In an emergency, I would check these sources in this order.
      Alarm System, Phone Alert, Radio, Television, Direct Call, Official news web sites. Social media would be the last place to look for factual information.

      He should had corrected the Alarm system and Phone Alerts first, then made a general call to media outlets in the area, then update social media.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by lgw · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, many news stations also have YouTube channels.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by lgw · · Score: 1

      To be fair to Hawaii - the proper, non-twitter method was used to send the missile alert. That same system had a way to say "oops", but bureaucracy happened. The tweet would have been an improvisation, not the intended system, for cancelling the alert.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by jellomizer · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wouldn't call Twitter a partisan website, But it isn't a good tool for emergency information.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    22. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by MrDozR · · Score: 1

      And I also think that the fact that Twitter is considered a communications channel AT ALL is disturbing.

      FTFY.

    23. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the biggest FUBAR here is that he either didn't think to contact his PR people IMMEDIATELY and have them put the word out, or his PR people were somehow all unavailable (something which no self-respecting government press secretary/PIO would EVER allow). When I worked as a government PIO, I wouldn't even go hiking without verifying first that I would have phone and internet coverage at all times, in case of just such an emergency. Almost no high-ranking government official actually does their own tweets, Facebook posts, website posts, etc (our flame-haired leader aside). They have a press secretary and PR people who handle that for them.

      If he got a call that the missile alert was a mistake at 8:09, he should have phoned his press secretary/PIO by 8:10, who should have alerted EVERY media outlet by no later than 8:15. Most government PR people have their press contacts list ready to send out mass texts and media posts for just this reason.

    24. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing that he admitted he forgot the password, however the idea that not updating twitter is failing to inform people of anything is bollocks.

    25. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why would he rely exclusively on Twitter when there's an entire industry whose job it is to disseminate information?

      Phone number to the media? Are you a time traveller from the 90s? The only thing the "news media" does now is publish tweets wrapped in clickbait headlines.

      No I'm not being facetous. Let's have a look shall we. I heard there's a tsunami warning current. Let's check CNN: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/0... Oh look, their source: https://twitter.com/SF_emergen...

    26. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      He should have issued a quick news conference and or radio broadcast.

      That's a great way of getting information out 10minutes AFTER most news outlets have published a tweet.

      Go to major news sites right now and find out about the tsunami warning. I challenge you to find one that doesn't reference Twitter. Here's the first I found: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/0... the tweet is half way down the page.

    27. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Good point, with how easy it is to back the alert system compared to successfully launching a nuclear tipped ICBM they might as well sound the all clear just as it is in re entry.

    28. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the president can air out his dirty laundry on Twitter, why can't Hawaiian officials use it to say: "You aren't going to be nuked!"

    29. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Back -> hack

    30. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Why would he rely exclusively on Twitter when there's an entire industry whose job it is to disseminate information?

      We really need to consider IQ tests for government officials. I can think of a half dozen better ways of getting this information out immediately to keep people from shitting themselves and panicking, without putting down my sandwich.

      Honestly twitter is the last the last tool on my mind since I still do not know anyone who has twitter.

    31. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps more people read Twitter then listen to radio or TV? No kids, this is why we had state sponsored media until the private sector cannibalized that too.

      I'm Canadian, yet I have the same fear of this happening in Canada. A day when some serious incident happens and I don't know because I've become accustomed to not watching TV, or listening to the radio. It's all garbage. Today for example I heard about the earthquake in Alaska not by radio or TV, but coworkers in BC.

      Governments have failed on so many levels ..

    32. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why couldn't his "no attack" message have gone out over the very same system that issued the "not a test" nuke warning?

      Does the alert system rely on twitter for updates?

      Why can a message that says "this is not a test" go out based on a single button push?

      --
      Ken
    33. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by clodney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't find it odd that he would use Twitter to correct a bad announcement - in situations like that you want to get on as many channels as you can, and lots of people will get Twitter with more immediacy than radio or TV. Nor can I get too worked up about him not knowing his password. I have seldom used accounts where I don't know the password, and would need access to my primary machine to get at my password file.

      This seems like the textbook example of a learning experience. A brand new system encountered a failure mode they hadn't anticipated, and they are going through lessons learned to correct for the future.

    34. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      Twitter is absolutely partisan. It's far left and has no problem with banning conservatives. They were even exposed as attacking them with AI algorithms to shadowban. Twitter is a total shitshow.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    35. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by g01d4 · · Score: 1

      I assumed he had a government Twitter account to be used when he needed to broadcast information to his staff/reports. So instead of contacting one person he'd broadcast/tweet the false alarm notification to his staff who'd then disseminate it through various channels, including a public facing account. So it would add a delay but the internal tweet kicks the dissemination industry into action.

    36. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't his "no attack" message have gone out over the very same system that issued the "not a test" nuke warning?

      Because the system can only send one of a small number of pre-defined messages and "my bad... ignore the previous message" wasn't one of them.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    37. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he rely exclusively on Twitter when there's an entire industry whose job it is to disseminate information?

      Maybe the governor is a millennial.

    38. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by DamnOregonian · · Score: 0, Troll

      In Twitter's defense, it's getting terribly hard to tell you guys apart from the Russian TrollBots

    39. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he should be lambasted for putting someone incompetent in charge of emergency alerts, not for forgetting his twitter password. A mistake is a mistake, but not being able to issue the correction in a timely way is incompetence. What if there were an actual emergency? you know, like someone sent a false missile alert? If they informed the governor within two minutes that this had gone out they should have issued the retraction in two minutes.

    40. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Despite multiple TOS violations, they've not disabled Donald Trump's account. That's hardly "far left".

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    41. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by beckett · · Score: 1

      Because the system can only send one of a small number of pre-defined messages

      without even looking at the short list of pre-defined messages, are you saying there was NO other possible message that would have been more appropriate than the one that went out initially?

      i mean, even "this is a test" or "hay guyz it's ok stop putting your kids into sewers right now" or would be preferable to the message that went out.

    42. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!! That's what Facebook is for!

      I'm kiding of course, but you would think it was while my son was in scouts. Ridiculous! Just because everyone else wants to give up their privacy doesn't mean the rest of us need to.

    43. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      They eventually used the same system to send out a retraction, it just took 45 minutes to figure out how.

    44. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by lgw · · Score: 1

      "#NAGA" surely?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      BINGO!

      I'm not on Twitter. Neither is anyone else in my family. Because state government wrongly assumes that all its citizens are willing to be interrupted by tweets all day long, those that aren't are just acceptable losses?

      Don't modern smartphones have the ability to receive "emergency communications" in a manner completely separate from any social network? Why didn't they use that communication method? It's an app on my phone and I cannot uninstall it (unless I wanted to root the phone that is). I can turn off updates to select types of emergencies, but there is one category "Messages from the President" that cannot be disabled. "Impending thermonuclear war" seems like an appropriate use for this app.

    46. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not?

      If I were designing that system, I'd certainly want to include an "Oops, my bad, stop panicking" message somewhere in the roster.

    47. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I don't find it odd that he would use Twitter to correct a bad announcement - in situations like that you want to get on as many channels as you can,

      To paraphrase an old Internet axiom: "on twitter nobody knows you are a dog."

      There is an official channel for issuing these warnings. Why would you trust someone on Twitter telling you that the official announcement was wrong?

      "Dear, come down to the shelter, a nuke is on the way!"

      "No, dear, @DaveIge38 on Twitter says it is a false alarm. I'm staying right he(&%@{{{{{

    48. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You'd think that e.g. a president of the US could be bothered to carry the little card with him needed to authorize a nuclear strike should things go bad in a hurry.

      It is more complicated than "the little card". It is called the Nuclear Football and it does, indeed, travel with the President wherever he goes. He doesn't have to "be bothered" to carry it, there is someone assigned to do that.

      More than a couple of people involved in getting that one right, and yet some recent residents couldn't be bothered.

      Which ones might you be referring to? The fact that you don't see it every time the media shows the President waving to the crowd doesn't mean it isn't there. I would expect that nobody is keeping you briefed on where the football is because you don't have the clearance or a need to know.

    49. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      When you say "industry", are you referring to those who still broadcast old-fashioned signals to boxes that the cord-cutting generation doesn't use anymore?

      In the US we have something called "freedom", which means you are free to not listen to most emergency notification systems. If you choose not to get weather alerts by not owning or using a NOAA weather radio with such features, you are free to do so. If you don't want to watch TV, ditto.

      Kind of hard to "disseminate" information to the masses who tend to now recognize only two forms of communication; social media and internet streaming.

      In the US, modern cell phones have an Emergency Alerts system. There are several options, like en/disabling Amber alerts, but you cannot disable the "Presidential Alert". It is hard not to notice your cellphone screeching at you.

      This alert system is also in other countries. I know what the alerts sound like because one day my phone started doing it. It was a test of the Taiwan alert system, and my phone was an unlocked HTC that was intended for sale in Taiwan. As I recall, they use certain numerical codes, and I had just not shut them off.

    50. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just where was this guy while these alerts went out? Hawaii! That's right. While people were freaking out about a possible attack, he's living it up in Hawaii, probably on tax payer money! Just who does this guy think he is!?

    51. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every alert system that I've ever received a message from had an "ALL CLEAR" message. They really thought that "Incoming missile" was a useful possibility, but didn't think that telling people the threat was over could be helpful?

    52. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      "Proprietary" may be the word he was looking for, or he could just be a dumbass.

    53. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by sjames · · Score: 1

      Even if you cut the cable, you should be able to receive local channels OTA.

    54. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      The operator freaked out when he got the NUKES INCOMING! FOR REAL! message and ran to his bunker. Took 45 minutes to convince him to come out and send the OOPS! message.

    55. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      That's actually not that bad of an example, there does appear to be some text containing actual reporting or analysis in-between the twits. I saw an "article" on the Fox News website recently that was nearly entirely copy+pastes from Twitter, prefaced with "So-and-so said," "Such-and-such replied," - and they weren't even relevant so-and-sos, but seemingly random users. If I wanted to read analysis from random internet twits - which I don't - I'd make an account there. Less ads and no begging for subscription.

    56. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't his "no attack" message have gone out over the very same system that issued the "not a test" nuke warning?

      Because the system can only send one of a small number of pre-defined messages and "my bad... ignore the previous message" wasn't one of them.

      This is no doubt a security feature meant to keep erroneous messages from being sent out by mistake.

    57. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The little card is actually the "nuclear biscuit", it is used along with the "nuclear football" and he does indeed carry it himself (or at least he should, but who knows with Trump).

      Not sure what happens if it is lost. President Clinton apparently lost it for several months, I think he was more concerned with getting interns to give him blow jobs at the time.

    58. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      He could have said a huge asteroid was incoming and would liquefy the planet and wipe out all life, whether in a sewer or not.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    59. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? You have trouble with every 'rule' that has an exception? How the heck are you still alive?

    60. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      without even looking at the short list of pre-defined messages, are you saying there was NO other possible message that would have been more appropriate than the one that went out initially?

      Yes. There were test messages (which never actually go out, I think). The issue is that the operator selected the wrong message: the "real" message instead of the test.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    61. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... "I forgot my password, teacher" ...

      You should be very pleased that Donald Trump remembers his. I will fault this politician for having poor back-up policy, not for failing to instantly access a low-quality corporate service.

    62. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I would think I'd want to be wearing brown pants in that situation

    63. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      that's already been discussed last week https://slashdot.org/story/18/...

    64. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      you are aware just because you have an account with either those doesn't mean you have to post every trivial thought. You can just follow accounts and read information.

    65. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by clodney · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase an old Internet axiom: "on twitter nobody knows you are a dog."

      There is an official channel for issuing these warnings. Why would you trust someone on Twitter telling you that the official announcement was wrong?

      "Dear, come down to the shelter, a nuke is on the way!"

      "No, dear, @DaveIge38 on Twitter says it is a false alarm. I'm staying right he(&%@{{{{{

      Fair enough, but with the clock ticking and every minute that goes by adding to the potential panic, why don't you take every option you have to try to get the corrected message out there? If people see 3 or 4 different twitter feeds saying "False alarm, do not panic", you at least have a chance to assuage people's fears. And remember, all this is happening in real time. This is not something they are planning out for the future, they are trying to react RIGHT NOW. In the first few minutes in a crisis atmosphere (because, after all, you just told over a million people that a nuke is inbound), would you have had a better idea?

    66. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by lgw · · Score: 1

      As the AC said, it's not just the football - the president has to carry a little card on his person. And it has come out that certain presidents couldn't be bothered.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    67. Re:Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as well by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      why don't you take every option you have to try to get the corrected message out there?

      Officials were already doing that.

  2. Stuff that matters? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 0

    Since when is it news if someone does not use twitter?

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Stuff that matters? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Because this person that does not use twitter things it is the only way to reach people.

      Try calling the radio and tv stations. The Governor of Hawaii does have a staff, right? They do have phones, don't they?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Stuff that matters? by gnick · · Score: 1

      Try calling the radio and tv stations.

      I spend a lot more time by my phone than I do watching TV/listening to radio. Twitter wouldn't have reached me unless DJT tweeted the all-clear, but since the alert reached everyone over their phones that does seem like the right vector for correcting it.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered that the Governor's staff and the TV and radio stations' staff might be trying to get the hell out of Dodge?

    4. Re:Stuff that matters? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Apparently the big story here is this: though he couldn't do it, he thought he should have used Twitter, instead of the state's website or the directly contacting the news media (by email or phone) or something like that. Twitter is what came to his mind. You sure that isn't weird/interesting?

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    5. Re:Stuff that matters? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Try calling the radio and tv stations.

      I spend a lot more time by my phone than I do watching TV/listening to radio. Twitter wouldn't have reached me unless DJT tweeted the all-clear, but since the alert reached everyone over their phones that does seem like the right vector for correcting it.

      Personally, whenever I get a storm alert I turn on the TV, radio, or get on the internet to stream a local radio or TV station to confirm what's happening and the area that the alert covers. I certainly don't check Twitter as a huge percentage of what's there is false or misleading. Plus, a twitter account is more likely to be hacked than a live news feed.

      BTW: practically every vehicle has a radio in it and most local stations offer streaming. The point is that you are a lot closer to a radio for much of the time than you think.

    6. Re:Stuff that matters? by gnick · · Score: 1

      ...practically every vehicle has a radio in it and most local stations offer streaming. The point is that you are a lot closer to a radio for much of the time than you think.

      I'm aware that cars typically have radios. I'm in my car less than an hour a day. I'm next to my phone more than 20. If there's an impending missile strike, I'll likely be seeking out an emergency broadcast, but I probably won't jump in my car.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:Stuff that matters? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Apparently the big story here is this: though he couldn't do it, he thought he should have used Twitter, instead of the state's website or the directly contacting the news media

      No, the story here was that when the news media ASKED him why he DIDN'T use Twitter, he told them he had forgotten his password. That doesn't say he wasn't communicating in other ways. It doesn't say that he thought that Twitter was the right way to communicate. It just deals with some allegedly horrific 17 minute gap "in the tape" of tweets where the Governor did not send a tweet when others were. Oh my God. The Governor didn't tweet. How awful! We could have all died!

      It isn't the Governor's job to call all the media in such an event. There is a department of the government that has that job. In Oregon it is called the Oregon Office of Emergency Management (OOEM), which used to be just OEM. There is an entire Joint Operations Center intended to deal with such things, and state communications staff on-site 24/7, and the media are on speed-dial. I dare say, most of the media wouldn't recognize the voice of the Governor on the phone if they were married to him.

  3. fair enough ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    Fair enough ... I would consider not knowing your Twitter password a badge of honor (not having an account even more so).

    Alerting broadcast media might have been a better use of time (if he wasn't already doing that) though.

    1. Re:fair enough ... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I would consider not knowing your Twitter password a badge of honor (not having an account even more so).

      Not having a Twitter account is a badge of honor.

      Having a Twitter account but not knowing your password is a badge of shame. It most likely means you set the app to remember your password so you don't have to type it in every time to login. Meaning anyone you lend your phone to, or steals your phone and manages to bypass its unlock security, can send out tweets in your name.

      Apps which access personal or private data should never remember your password, and require a fresh login not only when you start the app, but also if it's been placed in the background for more than a few minutes. If you hate remembering all the different passwords for all your accounts, use a password manager and be sure to remember its password.

      This does bring up the issue of why we're considering a message coming from a specific Twitter account to be an official channel. If you instead use something like a two-key digital signature to authenticate your message, then any platform - a personal blog, a slashdot post, even an anonymous message left on the local newspaper's website - could be used as an official channel, since it gives the media a means to validate that the message was sent by you (the person who holds the private key). The media just needs to know where to get the governor's public key. There's no need to use a login/password proprietary to one company.

  4. Fault in design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the need for correction in the case of a false positive rests with the governor needing to remember his twitter password, you've designed the system wrong.

  5. Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've never been on any sort of Facebook or Twitter type system. Is social media nonsense an official news channel now? If so I would rather have that missile strike.

    1. Re:Twitter? by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      You're using social media right now. Right now.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous != social media. The point is I have no Slashdot "account" -- there is no persona of me online.

    3. Re:Twitter? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      But you're reading and contributing to a social platform and gathering information from it, the way its editors and users shape it ... socially. You're still using social media, even if you can't be troubled to expose an anonymous user id to consolidate your posts/comments. Who cares if you tend to a persona or not? That's not stopping you (right now) from using social media. So, no holier-than-thou, please.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Twitter? by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      It is not an official news channel, but it is an official communication channel for most city/state leaders. A lot of people follow them so when something like this happens getting the word out quickly through all communication channels should happen sooner rather than later.

    5. Re: Twitter? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      But you're reading and contributing to a social platform and gathering information from it, the way its editors and users shape it ... socially.

      So an old radio or TV call-in show is social media because users and editors contribute to it and shape it?

      That seems like a pretty dumb definition.

    6. Re:Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you even know this is the same person? I could be Anonymous Coward #3458345373

    7. Re:Twitter? by clodney · · Score: 1

      Effective != Official

      Whether Twitter is an official channel or not is irrelevant. If it is effective, and you are trying to recover from an error, by all means use it.

      I don't use Twitter enough for it to be effective for me, and I don't follow the governor of my state, but for many people it would be effective.

    8. Re:Twitter? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Makes no difference, with respect to the point I'm making.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re: Twitter? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      No, dumb is pretending you don't get the distinction.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:Twitter? by beckett · · Score: 1

      You're using social media right now.

      slashdot is antisocial media.

    11. Re:Twitter? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Whether Twitter is an official channel or not is irrelevant. If it is effective, and you are trying to recover from an error, by all means use it.

      Read TFS. It says that officials were using it. The question was why the Governor didn't use it for a whole 17 minutes. OMG. Other officials were using it, and were almost certainly using the official twitter accounts that people who want to use twitter to get official warnings would be following. One should not expect to follow the Governor as the sole source of official warnings. That's just stupid.

      and I don't follow the governor of my state, but for many people it would be effective.

      The local city police have a twitter account and use it for stuff. I don' t know what stuff. After I set it up and found out how useless twitter was, I stopped looking at it. I went back a month ago and found it full of ads^H^H^Hpromoted tweets, so I left again after five minutes.

      I know what many agencies have found from using social media to issue warnings about things. It's not really a good way to do it. The campus safety department or state police, I forget which, used the campus alert system to warn people to stay away from a nearby frat house because there were shots fired, and instead of staying away a lot of people went to gawk. Same with a gas line break a couple of months ago.

    12. Re: Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dumb is pretending you don't get the distinction.

      Ok, so you're dumb, what else is new?

    13. Re: Twitter? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So let's see: you can't understand the difference between social media and broadcast media, and when that's pointed out, you trot out the craven, anonymous response we'd expect from a 5 year old. Excellent work! That'll show 'em.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    14. Re: Twitter? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Wasn't me, but he's right; you're an idiot. Radio and TV call in shows both meet the criteria you defined, and when I pointed that out all you could respond with was an insult and some muttering about "distinction". Grow up and learn to admit when you're wrong

  6. It is really scary! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    All that stands between an official statement from authorized government official and a possible malicious docxing is a weak, guessable twitter password. It might even be his zip code. And any Twitter employee or contractor can spoof any user account!

    And these jokers enact laws for "ensuring" cyber security.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:It is really scary! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I thought the scary thing was a populace so incredibly stupid that it wants a government to use a very unreliable and insecure system of social media for official announcements

    2. Re:It is really scary! by geekmux · · Score: 1

      All that stands between an official statement from authorized government official and a possible malicious docxing is a weak, guessable twitter password. It might even be his zip code. And any Twitter employee or contractor can spoof any user account!

      And these jokers enact laws for "ensuring" cyber security.

      If you think this is scary, you should see the POTUS Twitter feed...

  7. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, look at it this way: At least he's not a pedophile.

  8. password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His Twitter password was 12345? I have the same combination on my luggage!

    Alternate post: Why didn't he just ask the guy to read it off to him from the sticky note at the bottom of the monitor?

  9. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stormy Daniels for everyone! #MAGA

  10. Really Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure the original alert was not a Tweet, why the hell would you Tweet to rescind it? If the emergency alert system only has a "MISSILE INCOMING" button, but not a "OOPS OUR BAD" button that is a pretty big problem. Guarantee if the emergency alert system tells me a missile is going to drop on my head the first thing I do is not going to be logging into Twitter.

    1. Re:Really Twitter by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Guarantee if the emergency alert system tells me a missile is going to drop on my head the first thing I do is not going to be logging into Twitter.

      The system is not there for people like you.

      It is a "Dimocracy - government of the dim, by the dim, for the dim!"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  11. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Kennedy slept with everyone while he was President. Bill Clinton got blowjobs from his aides.

    Who the fuck cares. Don't act like you do.

  12. NATIONALIZE TWITTER by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2

    Only politicians and celebrities (CIA agents) use it anyway, so just nationalize it. That would also take care of the whole notion they get to censor people.

  13. I guess the US is doomed by klingens · · Score: 1

    If the highest ranking government official can't speak to the populace (or is it subjects?) without Twitter, then the US is doomed.

    It's over folks.

    1. Re:I guess the US is doomed by gnick · · Score: 1

      If the highest ranking government official can't speak to the populace (or is it subjects?) without Twitter, then the US is doomed.

      Blame the media. Twitter's the only way DJT can get his message to the people without having his facts corrected.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:I guess the US is doomed by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      The highest ranked government official routinely speaks random thoughts on Twitter. It's only the lower ranked officials that see the point in avoiding confusion, inflammatory statements, annoying nuclear-armed dictators, etc.

      Reader alert: The above post should be sarcastic.

    3. Re:I guess the US is doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "lies".

  14. He's the governor FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has more important things to do than maintain a Twitter account, or remember his password for such crap

  15. Easy Fix - Yellow PostIt Note taped to your screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy Fix - Yellow PostIt Note taped to your screen

    After all, this worked for sending out the alert... (As proven on HMEA interview on TV)

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/hawaiian-emergency-management-officials-hold-interview-post-notes-passwords-computer-screens/

  16. He should have called President Trump... by judoguy · · Score: 1

    ... he knows HIS password!

    --
    Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    1. Re:He should have called President Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the great lament of Americans everywhere.

    2. Re:He should have called President Trump... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      To the great lament of his own staff

      FTFY

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:He should have called President Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the posts (the more level-headed ones that typically get posted mid-day) actually come from his staff. If I had to guess, I'd say it's saved in his phone, but he has no idea what the password actually is. IIRC, an ex-staffer was the one who temporarily disabled his account a few months ago.

    4. Re:He should have called President Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the great lament of his own staff

      FTFY

      I don't care what a bunch of Russians think.

  17. Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same error that was made in Hawaii was also made in Japan within a couple of days. What are the chances that these two independent errors happened near the same times? Could it be that NK was launching an attack that was successfully intercepted before it could do any damage?

    1. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are the chances that these two independent errors happened near the same times?

      Very good actually.

      You climb down stairs everyday whithout problem. Yet, if you hear that someone has hurt him/herself falling down stairs, you can't help but think about it the next time you end up at the top of a flight of stairs, thus greatly increasing the risk of a misstep and a fall.

      The guy in Japan had heard of the incident in Hawaii, and the stress of not wanting to make the same mistake, even if completely unconscious, greatly increased the risk of actually repeating the same mistake.

      It's a very well known flaw of the human psyche. Never attribute to a conspiracy what can be perfectly explained by human nature.

    2. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's quite how it works. People hear about accidents on the roads in the news all the time, yet most people aren't going to be more likely to get behind the wheel and cause one themselves just for hearing it

    3. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If NK launched an ICBM, the counter-attack would be completed before the ICBM was in the zone where it would be destroyed. The counter-attack would be immediate and comprehensive. As there was no response, it is impossible for there to have been an actual attack. Please go back to your regularly scheduled conspiracy theory.

  18. Post-it note on the monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have put it on a post-it note on the monitor like a normal person.

  19. Trump could've handled that job better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe I said that.

    1. Re:Trump could've handled that job better by ruddk · · Score: 1

      Isn't his password Covfefe?

  20. Clearly the post-it note fell off his monitor by inshreds · · Score: 1

    We all understand that those darn post-it notes fall off the monitor after while. This must have been the issue.

    1. Re:Clearly the post-it note fell off his monitor by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Governor. I've found your post it note.

      Your password is
      warningpoint2

      Happy to help!

  21. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They tried to impeach Clinton for it, and threw hillarys defense of him in her face during her election. They need to eat some crow.

  22. Re: Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as wel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously US is run from an asylum.

  23. If Twitter's going to be the official emergency management channel from now on, I guess I'd better recover my own Twitter password ...

  24. Incoming ICBM and Twitter by aicrules · · Score: 1

    Well, I for one don't care because even if I had seen the alert on twitter I can promise you I would not be going back to twitter after that. Who would? What's the point?

    1. Re:Incoming ICBM and Twitter by DanDD · · Score: 1

      Dude, I was there, and your sentiment was shared by many. Saturday afternoon at a flea market in Ocean View, south tip of Big Island, everyone was stoned.

      Then again, they live in the shadow of a giant active volcano, so maybe being stoned all the time is warranted...

      --
      "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
  25. GOd forbid I have to have Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to monitor enough shit in my life. It's bad enough that my county not only has their official website but a facebook site. And sometimes they announce things on their website and other times on facebook.

    And of course there's the email messages from the list I'm on.

    And some folks think putting their annoucements on whatever shitty platform they use is enough - "I announced it on my facebook page! You have no excuse!"

    This is getting ridiculous.

    I may revolt and say that if I don't get a fucking personal phone call (NO ROBOCALLS!!!), it doesn't count.

  26. Liberals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the liberal governor is...
    1. Too stupid to realize he has other forms of communication available to him.
    or

    2. Too stupid to realize he has a responsibility to properly manage things like that in the first place.
    or

    3. He is and should be the person making the decision to put out such a message, and completely ignored that responsibility.

  27. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tulsi Gabbard is the only Democrat I would vote for, for president.

    There isn't a finer representative associated with either of the "two" parties.
    .

  28. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to eat some humble pie.

  29. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better than getting aids form your blowjobs.

  30. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clinton *was* impeached.

    http://www.history.com/this-da...

    Words mean things.

  31. Governor What? by avandesande · · Score: 2

    Unless he has a personal assistant with him at all times why is he supposed to respond faster than 17 minutes? Hell I've taken craps that were longer than that!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Governor What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if he was waiting for his secretary to come into his office to have sex with him before they all died.

    2. Re:Governor What? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a medical problem. I'd recommend talking to a doctor about that. He may tell you to eat less, and eat different. He probably won't tell you to use a more natural posture (squatting, not sitting) but that helps as well.

    3. Re:Governor What? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Or could just read a magazine or let things take care of themselves.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  32. Umn .. Did his phone work? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    Did his god damn phone work? Does he know that he can push buttons on it and when done in the correct order he can talk to someone? Wait, he probably didn't know the phone number.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Umn .. Did his phone work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False alert - people panicking- fucktard thinks it's important to use Twitter to update the public. Said fucktard didn't remember the password. And, not at all suprised that this fucktard didn't think it was important (after all, Twitter is important, right??) to ISSUE A PASSWORD RESET ASAP!!!! Oh, but it probably goes to a recovery e-mail address he doesn't have access too *facepalm*

      What a shit show!!!

    2. Re:Umn .. Did his phone work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 100% certain that all his tweets go through an "optics" review before posting. They couldn't get the board together faster than 30 minutes to approve his tweet.

    3. Re:Umn .. Did his phone work? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and when done in the correct order he can talk to someone?

      Yes which is why it took so long to get the information out. Calling individual media outlets is an incredibly inefficient way of disseminating information. For better or worse in any emergency twitter will get the information to a wider audience and will be picked up by the media faster than anything else these days.

      I heard there's a tsunami warning in the USA.
      https://edition.cnn.com/2018/0... : Count 1 official Twitter source
      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-... : Count 1 semi-official Twitter source, 2 unoffical twitter sources.
      https://www.theguardian.com/us... : Count no link to Twitter, but a quote in the article from an official's twitter account.

    4. Re:Umn .. Did his phone work? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Regarding wide audience - The percentage of the population with a Twitter account is less than the percentage who own a TV or a radio.

      Regarding speed - Even if I did have a Twitter account, do I know what the governor's username is? Do I know that the governor's account is the one that will be used to send the message? Do I know that this kind of emergency alert will be disseminated on Twitter at all?

      I'd be expecting it through a more official channel. You know, like TV or radio, where emergency broadcasts have always been and continue to be disseminated. I can guarantee you that in each of your three examples, the standard emergency broadcast system was used, and it was no slower than Twitter.

  33. Passwordless Login Plug by CloudDrakken · · Score: 0

    Passwordless Login would save humankind over 4 trillion mouse clicks a year... Join the revolution! at "email me instead of making me remember unique chars" dot org

  34. Kiss your ass goodby by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

    More likely he had his head between his knees until someone told him it was a mistake.

  35. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tweeting doesn't correct anything. The message should come from the same system that broadcast the original warning. Who follows the Governors twitter?

  36. Why didn't he just by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Why didn't he just phone the Russian embassy and ask them?

    1. Re:Why didn't he just by jittles · · Score: 1

      Why didn't he just phone the Russian embassy and ask them?

      He was at Sarah Palin's house and was looking out his window at Russia.

  37. The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real news story here is that the governor of Hawaii (one of the 50 states of the United States of America, one of the most powerful countries on Earth) uses twitter to disseminate important information like: That missile warning is false. Right because in a real nuclear war you should be believing anything that twitter has to say.

    Also apparently he uses his account so infrequently that he can't log onto it without some prep time.

  38. Re: Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as wel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If several Twitter accounts went silent, modern media outlets would think it was the apocalypse for lack of things to report on.

  39. Re: Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as wel by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

    You just noticed that ? As Heinlein foretold, Welcome to the Crazy Years. . .

  40. Too bad his login wasn't "Aloha" by gachunt · · Score: 1

    Then his password would be the same.

  41. Yellow sticky note by twdorris · · Score: 1

    He needs to write it down on a yellow sticky note stuck to his monitor. Obs. Good enough for the operations manager Jeffrey Wong, good enough for him. https://qz.com/1181763/hawaiis...

  42. Re:Time for a change of leadership by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Tulsi Gabbard is the only Democrat I would vote for, for president.

    Nope, I couldn't vote for her. I think it's time to replace all members of congress. It's also time for term limits.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  43. Not everyone uses Twitter. by sjbe · · Score: 1

    So I don't have a Twitter account and have no plans to get one. Nothing against it just have no use for it. So using Twitter to communicate to me is going to be ineffective at best because the information will be at least 2nd hand by the time I get it. Twitter is a terrible substitute since why would anyone believe a message over twitter over the official warning system?

    The correct answer is to send out another message on the same system that obviously has the ability to contact every cell phone in the state.

  44. Twitter is a terrible idea by sjbe · · Score: 1

    For better or worse in any emergency twitter will get the information to a wider audience and will be picked up by the media faster than anything else these days.

    You've apparently forgotten that they have a system that is able to contact EVERY PHONE IN THE STATE. In what universe is Twitter more efficient than that? Furthermore Twitter is hardly trustworthy nor does everyone have a Twitter account (I do not have one) so it's worse for me than the media.

    1. Re:Twitter is a terrible idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You've apparently forgotten that they have a system that is able to contact EVERY PHONE IN THE STATE.

      The system that wasn't working, and wasn't able to send out the correction? Is that the system you're talking about? Great system that.

    2. Re:Twitter is a terrible idea by sjbe · · Score: 1

      The system that wasn't working, and wasn't able to send out the correction? Is that the system you're talking about? Great system that.

      Yep, that system. Twitter is not an acceptable alternative.

    3. Re:Twitter is a terrible idea by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yep, that system. Twitter is not an acceptable alternative.

      No one said it was. But when your communication system goes down, while people go to replace it the best way to get a message out to people is via traditional media. And you can say what you want, there's no arguing that Twitter is now a core part, if not the fastest way, to get messages to the media.

  45. Re:Time for a change of leadership by clodney · · Score: 1

    Term limits - a method for ensuring that right about the time someone is good at their job they are forced to leave it.

    There is a reason why we don't have term limits in industry, and that is because we value experience. If you want to find a way to lessen the advantage of incumbency, find a way that doesn't ensure we have perpetual neophytes.

  46. Re: Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as wel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically incorrect. The crazy guy who runs the universe is (in addition to his cat and the occasional visiter) the only one outside the asylum.

  47. This is OES job by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Alerts and updates are done by OES director or designated person under direction of the Governor. Governors like the President don't do the actual messaging or press the red button, they may give orders but not the person actually writing a message about incoming missile. i.e. Governors should not be the ones sending a tsunami alert.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  48. No false alarm button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely to god they could have a "I accidentally pushed a button" button? A never mind button?

    1. Re: No false alarm button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the audio software can come with an emergency halt button to click for feedback damage prevention, you'd think they could have done the same thing. Pull a plug...

  49. Re:Time for a change of leadership by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Term limits - a method for ensuring that right about the time someone is good at their job they are forced to leave it.

    I can count the number of people who are "good at their job" in congress on the fingers of one hand. Are you aware that congress has about a 9% approval rating? If most of these people were something other than worthless, their approval rating might be higher. I'd rather have perpetual neophytes than perpetual slobs whose goal seems to be to get rich at the expense of the tax payer.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  50. Twitter, part of every first response system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in the name of F*CK uses twitter in the infrastructure of a warning system?

  51. I don't twit by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Once I asked why I should have a Twitter account, and was told, "to get news quicker". My response was, "Why? The 'instant' news is always wrong! I'd rather wait so there's at least a chance it might be somewhat accurate".

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  52. It's on that Yellow Sticky Note !!! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    In reference to a screen grab (in another news article) of the command center in which behind the dept head is clearly a yellow stick with a password on it. The stick note clearly states "password."

    The person in charge of media rep later replied "that's to some old non-essential system - nothing important" Keeping it for a friend.

    Apparently - it might be the govn'rs missing Twitter password. :-P

  53. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Term limits - a method for ensuring that right about the time someone is good at their job they are forced to leave it.

    The theory behind congressional term limits is that the job of a congressperson is to accumulate pork for their district and their campaign contributors by screwing everyone else, and thus we're better off with them being bad at their jobs.

    Unfortunately, I think term limits would just give us politicians even more concerned about pleasing their sponsors so they can pick up a cushy advisory job when they get termed out.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  54. Who cares. Non-issue. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    It's a good sign that the man isn't into Twitter so he can forget his password.

    There were other people going around doing their jobs; it's not his job-- that is why somebody doing their job INFORMED HIM of the problem because nobody can be all places at once.

    Two parts to the job)

    1) Explain what is going on (being in charge = informed or investigating) with some authority behind what you know (supposed to.)

    2) Plan how to resolve the problem and prevent future repeats. This step is often skipped because people want #1 immediately and competent administrators are "wasting time" doing way more of part #2 than part #1.

    If you judge leadership on quickness to please YOU with #1 you bias the system to promote people more talented at #1 than #2. Bullshit artists on into social media benefit greatly from you complainers - YOU people are part of the problem of poor government.

    I would assume other staff doing their job would inform others BESIDES just me about the problem. The Governor is supposed to govern which does not mean covering breaking news-- there is was a whole profession for doing that... (have we forgotten what reporters are???)

    A competent Governor should be the last person you hear from at the end of the event... and later on when they implement their plan to fix it.

  55. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Maybe he does. Doesn't mean the "moral crusaders" don't need to eat crow too.

  56. Just Put It on a Sticky! by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    He could just write his password in a Post-It and put it on his monitor. You know, like his emergency management guys...

  57. He Could Have Asked Me. I Know It. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His password is 12345, just like his luggage.

  58. Hawaii EOC Picture by CRB9000 · · Score: 1

    The Twitter password was on the postit note in the Hawaii EOC picture from last summer. He should have just called them.

  59. Re:Time for a change of leadership by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    I can count the number of people who are "good at their job" in congress on the fingers of one hand. Are you aware that congress has about a 9% approval rating?

    Of course "Congress" has a low approval rating. Most of the members of Congress do not represent you -- they represent their own districts and their own people and they work to bring resources (jobs, money, etc) to their people. If they don't, then everyone else will get all the good stuff, the people of that district will get angry, and they'll not vote for that member of congress for reelection.

    The funny thing is... most people really like THEIR particular member of congress. It's the people from every other district that they hate.

  60. Internet != Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was once told that the Internet could survive some nukes...

    But with Twitter we have a SPOF.

  61. Elites by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of fucking idiots... Makes you wonder; how the hell Im i not making more $$ than them WTF... ahh yes friends

    --
    [($)]
  62. Our leaders are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our leaders are idiots.

  63. Re: Time for a change of leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congress is 535 people, only three of whom are nominally supposed to represent you. 3/535 is about 0.2% expected approval.

    9% is nearly fifty times the expected approval rating for that situation.
    The President is supposed to represent one hundred percent of the people. Not just his party, not just his base, not just his personal corporations.
    He has about a third of his nominal potential approval rating.

    So Congress is about 150 times more popular than the President. Mcconnel, Feinstein, etc are, as a group, 150 times better than the president in popular approval.

    Let that sink in for a bit.

  64. Nuclear Shelter by snookiex · · Score: 1

    You know, there's no cellphone signal in a bunker.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  65. #FuckNAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mrggl mrggle grrrgl! Gr mrgurrgle gr Naga gr murggl murgl gurgl!
    #Murlocmasterrace

  66. Re: Time for a change of leadership by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Congress is 535 people, only three of whom are nominally supposed to represent you. 3/535 is about 0.2% expected approval.

    Math is not your speciality.

    9% is nearly fifty times the expected approval rating for that situation.

    Math is really not your speciality.

    The President is supposed to represent one hundred percent of the people. Not just his party, not just his base, not just his personal corporations. He has about a third of his nominal potential approval rating.

    You'll have to tell us what a "nominal potential approval rating" is. I've been following politics closely for many years and never heard that term.

    So Congress is about 150 times more popular than the President. Mcconnel, Feinstein, etc are, as a group, 150 times better than the president in popular approval.

    Wow, that's so illogical I don't know where to begin to deconstruct it.

    Let that sink in for a bit.

    Major, epic fail in math, reasoning, understanding. Let that sink in for a bit.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  67. Re:Time for a change of leadership by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Of course "Congress" has a low approval rating. Most of the members of Congress do not represent you -- they represent their own districts and their own people and they work to bring resources (jobs, money, etc) to their people.

    I never said most of congress represents me. I am represented by one person in the house and two senators. Your "of course" makes no sense. I hope you realize approval ratings change over time. CNN says, "Congress's overall 10% approval is the lowest for Congress in Quinnipiac's history of data back to 2003. Using Gallup data beyond that, it's the lowest for Congress in data back to 1974."

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  68. Re: Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as we by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The destruction of our democracy it's going to be based on disinformation muslin of news outlets there's very few left of trust and was Trump taking away all the PBS is funding democracy now might not make it without contributions from poor folk like us cuz if you're not Trump and his buddies you're not in the 1%!!!!!!! They say that are actual middle class now starts at 1.2 million dollars per person per household so if you're not bringing that home guess what sucker you're working class extremely Brave coward Hoka Hey

  69. Re: Guess he forgot phone #'s to news media as wel by kenh · · Score: 1

    Because the system can only send one of a small number of pre-defined messages and apparently "my bad... ignore the previous message" wasn't one of them.

    FTFY

    Somehow, 38 minutes later, they somehow managed to send the 'all clear' over the self-same system. Did programmers add an additional message, test it, then roll it into production in those 38 minutes, or did it take 38 minutes to find the [More] button to provide the operator with access to the 'all clear, no problem' message option?

    --
    Ken