Slashdot Mirror


The Rise Of The Contract Workforce (npr.org)

An anonymous reader shares a report: A new NPR/Marist poll finds that 1 in 5 jobs in America is held by a worker under contract. Within a decade, contractors and freelancers could make up half of the American workforce. Workers across all industries and at all professional levels will be touched by the movement toward independent work -- one without the constraints, or benefits, of full-time employment. Policymakers are just starting to talk about the implications.

[...] It's not just business driving the trend. Surveys show a large majority of freelancers are free agents by choice. John Vensel is a contract attorney at Orrick who grew up a few miles from Wheeling, on the other side of the Pennsylvania state line. In his 20s, he was a freelance paralegal by day and a gig musician by night. "I actually wanted to be a rock star," he says. But these days there are no edgy vestiges of a former rocker, only a 47-year-old family man cooing over cellphone photos of his children, Grace and Gabe. In the two decades in between, Vensel worked full-time corporate jobs. But he was laid off in 2010, on the eve of his graduation from his night-school law program. He graduated with huge piles of debt, into one of the worst job markets. For a time, Vensel commuted three hours round-trip to a full-time job in Pittsburgh. But more recently, he quit and took up contracting to stay near home in Wheeling.

16 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Glad I'm retiring soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've worked hard, lived below my means, and saved ferociously for two decades now and I'm getting ready to retire with a 7 digit investment portfolio in a year or two before I'm 50. I feel sorry for the young people just entering the workforce, what a different scenario they will be facing with the Republican destruction of the social contract and delivering all power to corporate America. It's a much more lopsided equation than it used to be. As my late dad used to say, BOHICA. Bend Over Here It Comes Again.

    1. Re:Glad I'm retiring soon by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The social contract has been deteriorating for a long time, and it was not only republicans doing it. Loyalty from both sides (employers/employees) has faded to almost nothing now. A friend and I were working the same job in 2000. He is still there and has more vacation then he is allowed to take, and good money. But I have time off whenever I want and also good money. Contracting works for me!

    2. Re:Glad I'm retiring soon by youngone · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Your link to the John Birch Society is informative, but pretty much agrees with the A/C above.

      Founder Robert W. Welch Jr., Fred C. Koch

      Who funds the Tea Party side of the GOP? Koch Industries.
      Just a bunch of self interested billionaires spewing endless propaganda.

    3. Re:Glad I'm retiring soon by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Loyalty from both sides (employers/employees) has faded to almost nothing now.

      This has been going on for a LOOOONG time.

      At least a couple of decades ago, I realized that there was no loyalty of the employer to the employee.

      The W2 employee is JUST as readily fired/let go as the 1099 contractor.

      I figured, hey, if you have the job security of a contractor, you might as well get the bill rate of a contractor.

      Just make sure to incorporate yourself...makes life easier.

      I went the S-Corp route, never looked back.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. What do you want us to say? by H3lldr0p · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The situation sucks. Not only in the present but it was make the future suck as well because everyone caught in it are going to feel a crunch come retirement, if they ever do get to retire. There's no guarantees with the mighty 401(k) and IRA that are tied to market forces which we have no command or control over.

    There are structural problems with our society that allow this to happen. It's not only coded in our employment laws but also in the anti-union bent of corporate profit imperatives. We want people to take responsibility for their own success but remove every single tool that might be used for that through black-letter law or through making it so expensive in seeking redress of wrongs it become untenable, even in principle, to see it done. We allow for unilateral NDAs to be upheld. We allow for so much to be hidden away that even if I were to invest the time (as if I had the time to invest) looking into a potential employer, I wouldn't find be able to find the problems they have.

    So what do you want us to talk about here? We know about it. We work as well as we can within it. There's public outcry but no political will to do anything. This is the endpoint of 40 years of corporate political influence. What's there to be surprised about it?

    1. Re:What do you want us to say? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Someone choosing to contract over being a W-2 truly is disadvantaged in many ways. This includes taxation (pays the full FICA tax), benefits (no individual health insurance market worth a damn), worker protection, vacation/sick/parental leave and retirement savings (401k's way superior to IRA's).

      Even if the hourly rate is 2x, it still isn't quite enough to close that gap.

      I'll agree that independent contracting is NOT for everyone, but if you want the freedom and wish to put in the extra work, it can be quite lucrative and satisfying.

      First, with regard to the FICA (and medicare, the "employment taxes"). Yep, you have to pay both sides of this, HOWEVER there is a way around this somewhat.

      You can form a S-Corp. With this you pay yourself (as sole employee) a "reasonable"salary, and you only have to pay the employment taxes on that "reasonable salary".

      Example: Say you bill out $100K annually.

      You pay yourself a "salary" of $40K. Throughout the year, you pay fed and state taxes and both halves of the FICA/Medicare taxes ONLY on that $40K.

      At the end of the year, the remaining $60K, you deduct your business expenses, etc....and then the remainder falls through on your personal taxes, and you only pay federal and state taxes on that. That is your "disbursement".

      Yep, takes some paperwork shuffling, but can be done.

      For vacation/sick and health and retirement, well, you have to know what your bill rate is to negotiate.

      And it is likely quite a bit more that double as you'd mentioned.

      Over the years, I've been quite happy with my insurance I buy..I get a "high deductible" policy, usually with like $1300 deductible. With this I can open a HSA (Health Savings Account) that I fund fully each year Pre-tax. I pay my routine medical costs with this and the insurance policy is there for emergency care. Actually, after Obama care, the insurance part got MUCH more $$...due to the requirements to have stupid coverage I don't need (I don't ever need prenatal or maternity coverage, I'm a guy and not having kids)....but even so, you do your bill rate to cover that. It's not that difficult, and the coverage MORE than serves me well with my medical needs. And I am a bit older now, some pre-existing stuff, but still...is not that much a strain.

      I have investment accounts set up and I put money way pre-tax to the max, and some that is post tax. I have in my bill rate enough to cover me to take off about 3 weeks a year sick/vacation.

      Yes, it takes more of my time, but I get the benefits of making my own hours, taking off when needed. I'm fortunately enough to work remotely, so I can really set up shop wherever I want..I can be working from a bar in Key West if I wish....

      :)

      But no, it isn't for everyone....but it can be a nice and rewarding way to work. You bring in a LOT of $$, but you have to be disciplined enough to save for taxes, retirement and expenses....but even after that, you can make enough to have a good bit of disposable fun money too, depending on the field you are in.

      It helps if you have people skills too...to get and KEEP longer term gigs.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:What do you want us to say? by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes it's the same old 'sock your money away until you die' philosophy. People don't know when they will die. My wife has been seriously ill twice, should we be living an ultra-frugal life now and basically making our lives miserable and never doing anything fun together as a family so I can have a big pile of money once everyone has gone their own separate way? I understand that there are over spenders, but what I am saying is that there are under spenders too.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:What do you want us to say? by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if saving for retirement is beyond this balance for many people? There are a lot of people who don't make enough to both save for retirement and live a comfortable life. Just because they haven't socked money away doesn't mean they are financially irresponsible.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  3. Because Companies are mistreating their Employees by Quantus347 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dirty little secret of this trend is that it's happening because the employers increasingly getting away with policies that in past times would have been called mistreatment of their workforce. The American workforce has increasingly moved out of the blue collar industries that had fought long and hard for Regulatory and Union protections, to the comparatively unregulated and unprotected world of white collar drudgery. Things like Union protections and Pension Programs are a things of the past, and loyalty (in either direction) has been entirely removed from the equation.

    The vast majority of people would not cast off the security of a large organization and take on all the risk of going freelance while there are alternative. But increasingly the Companies are asking for more and more from their employees and giving less and less in return, to the point where the Hassle&Restriction of a large organization out weights diminishing expectation of Job Security that is the whole point.

    --
    Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
  4. I'd be cool with this... by RyanFenton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...if we had a basic floor by some mechanism, where someone couldn't fall below, leading to a semi-permanent drain on society, and a society that was unwilling to have people die for their own benefit.

    You know, something closer to the biblical ideal espoused in the 'new testament' part of the most consistently referenced book in this nation, but with the freedoms espoused in the other largely revered document, our constitution.

    A 'basic income' system would work, but some mix of unions/safety net if that wasn't possible could at least mitigate those falling through the cracks.

    Education also helps - but everyone can be suckered, or just have the bad luck to be taken advantage of for too long. Even the smartest folks can live most of their lives in abject circumstances for the sake of loved ones, or ideals where that intelligence doesn't help them.

    A more ideal case would be if everyone had some base line, could be sure that everyone they loved would at least survive in some level of comfort, and were free to help, not in the confines of a arbitrary-hour work week, but could use tools to be available whenever made sense, without fear of becoming bankrupt later in life for pursuing whatever they felt helped others the most.

    Money should still matter - what folks are willing to reward more or less can still matter... but it shouldn't be increasingly the ONLY thing that matters, above life, death, and everything else.

    Shared social value should matter for SOMETHING, shouldn't it?

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:I'd be cool with this... by DMJC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      heh you just described literally every other country in the western world.

    2. Re:I'd be cool with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean every other country in the developed world?

      Yes, money is important, but there becomes a point where a country should decide to be more than a fiefdom, a place where a few people live off other people's labor, and the rest know nothing but "let them eat cake" replies and despair. This makes for a great sci-fi dystopia setting, but not a place where one wants to send their sons and daughters to live in. Capitalism needs some type of sanity checks, or else there will be nothing left but polluted air/water/soil.

      Tax-wise, it is simple. Business profits get taxed on a sliding scale. Then, there are sales and import taxes. You can play games with hiding money from income taxes, but it is a lot harder to sneak that Lear jet or Maybach past the border patrol without the law knowing. Drop the income tax, and add a category VAT. Similar with estate taxes, where having wealth taxed is important.

      Auto insurance would be replaced by no-fault, unlimited coverage, paid for by a fuel and energy usage tax. This way, there are no more issues with uninsured/underinsured coverage.

      Health insurance would be single payer, just like the rest of the world. The US spends twice as much than any other country per capita, and total than any other country on health care. Having sickness or injury not wipe your life's savings isn't a bad idea.

      Now for a minimum guaranteed income: If people have some security that they will be fed/clothed/housed, they can actually do stuff in the economy that will more than recoup the cash spent on this. Mazlow's Pyramid shows this out. If you have a population slaving to exist, the country tends to wind up being a footnote in the history books.

      Education?

      I went to college with classmates from other countries. Their education was paid for by their governments. All of them are doing well, with zero debt. They pay far more in taxes to their Fatherlands/Motherlands/Mainland than their education cost.

      If you plant seeds and till the soil, you get a FAR greater harvest than if you say it isn't worth buying the seeds, and wondering why you have nothing but weeds. Even the dumbest, most inbred hayseed of a farmer understands this. However, the US government, particularly one political party, fails to get this. So, our country fails in life and is the laughingstock of the world.

      Of course, the question of "how does one pay for it?" come about? Simple. If businesses paid their share of taxes like they did before 1980, there would be no deficit.

    3. Re:I'd be cool with this... by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What 'freedom' do you have in the US that you wouldn't have as a citizen of any other democratic wealthy nation? Freedom to go bankrupt if you get sick.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  5. Re:try before you buy by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's getting increasingly difficult to fire poor performing employees. C

    With the proliferation of "Right to Work" laws and states it has gotten much easier to get rid of any employee for practically any non-discriminatory reason, including their politics.

    Non-union employees have essentially zero job protections and with the death of unions we have fewer and fewer union employees.

  6. An Unfortunate Trend by The+Snazster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So far as IT goes, I can say this highlights a very unfortunate trend. There is now an expectation that highly skilled workers in a very specific discipline are available to come out of the woodwork when they are called, that they will be grateful for whatever they can get, and then will quietly slink away to try to find and compete for an opportunity to work somewhere else. We are not talking about salaried contractors hired through a contracting firm, or about the traditional contract jobs of yore, where a self-employed contractor could expect to get the big bucks and make more than enough to carry them through the gaps until their next gig, swapping the job security for financial remuneration. The expectation now is that they will take these jobs, many paying no more than what is comparable for full-time employees (and with no benefits), and like it. In general, unless the remuneration is high enough to offset many other factors (such as the uncertainties and income insecurity, lack of benefits, and the lack of employer provided training) these contract engagements should only be taken as last resort. They tend to be bad economic choices for the worker in the same way that "rent-to-own" is a bad way to furnish your home.

  7. Why do people like instability? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm one of those strange people who prefers a full time job, with a steady paycheck. I know the absolute dollar value for contracts in my field is higher than I get as an FTE, but everyone I know doing contract work is constantly hustling for a new job and never knows where their money will be coming from. I work for an IT services company so I get tons of exposure to different projects. I'm not sure I'd feel the same way if I didn't get work that varied often, but knowing you're going to be paid and can cover your expenses is a relief. I'm not a natural salesman, and really don't want to be looking for work again 2 weeks into a 3-month contract. We employ contractors in some positions where I work, and it's not exactly a ringing endorsement of the contracting lifestyle overhearing them calling headhunters, juggling bills, etc.

    People with families, houses and other fixed committments tend to favor steady income. Companies want a disposable, nomadic workforce that never puts down roots and can load their belongings into their car at a moment's notice. I'm strange in that I think it's a good idea for people to stick around, see their projects through, and get involved in the communities they live in. I know employer/employee loyalty is at an all-time low but it doesn't have to be. I think well-run companies that think long term (a minority, I know) don't really want a payroll full of mercenaries that they can't really count on. One of the best things that could happen through the tax code and accounting rules would be to encourage employment of FTEs over contractors. Right now, companies do everything they can to avoid hiring people because there's no incentive. If you made it so that retaining and paying employees is cheaper than a bunch of hired guns, lots of people would be much less stressed.