Slashdot Mirror


Lawyers Faced With Emojis and Emoticons Are All \_("/)_/ (wsj.com)

Zorro shares a WSJ report: Lawyers gathered at the Atlanta office of a big law firm were debating a head-scratching legal question. What does the emoji known as the "unamused face" actually mean? They couldn't even agree that the emoji in question -- it has raised eyebrows and a frown -- looked unamused. "Everybody said something different," recalls Morgan Clemons, 33 years old, a regulatory compliance lawyer at Aldridge Pite who organized the gathering last summer at Bryan Cave LLP, called "Emoji Law 101." Emojis -- tiny pictures of facial expressions or objects used in text messages, emails and on social media -- are no longer a laughing matter for the legal profession. (Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source.) Increasingly, they are bones of contention in lawsuits ranging from business disputes to harassment to defamation. In one Michigan defamation dispute, the meaning of an emoticon, an emoji-like image created with text characters from a standard keyboard, was up for debate.

A comment on an internet message board appeared to accuse a local official of corruption. The comment was followed by a ":P" emoticon. The judges on the Michigan Court of Appeals concluded in 2014 that the emoticon "is used to represent a face with its tongue sticking out to denote a joke or sarcasm." The court said the comment couldn't be taken seriously or viewed as defamatory. Puzzled lawyers are turning to seminars, informal meetings and academic papers to discern innuendo in seemingly innocuous pictures of martini glasses and prancing horses.

123 comments

  1. context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the fuck do words mean i don't even

    1. Re:context by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      Who cares what words mean as long as it gets more billable hours for lawyers and paralegals.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what the fuck do words mean i don't even"

      Oh irony...

    3. Re:context by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Who cares what words mean as long as it gets more billable hours for lawyers and paralegals.

      Lawyers can kiss my big purple aubergine! [that's eggplant for the yanks]

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:context by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Who yanks their aubergines?!

      :P

      :/

      :::

      *_*

    5. Re:context by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How do words work? It's a miracle!

    6. Re: context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do

      B========D

      LOL lameness

    7. Re:context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8=====D

  2. Defamation??? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An emoticon is understood, by definition, to convey emotion.

    I get how certain emoticons might feel offensive to some people in certain circumstances, but how can what someone *FEELS* be defamatory?

    1. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're a hate crime. Stop oppressing me with your continued existence.

    2. Re:Defamation??? by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Expressing "feeings" doesn't have to meet the legal definition of defamation to still wind up getting lawyers involved. Even so, would you consider a restaurant review that says "My [food emoji] had [insect emoji] and [poop emoji] in it. Never eat here." ... to be an expression of "feelings," or the use of symbols to convey what any reasonable person would consider to be something exactly like "My salad had bugs and shit in it. Never eat here." ?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Defamation??? by Junta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the cited example, it was the emotion that made it *not* defamation. If taken as serious, it might have been defamatory, but the emoji declaring it as a joke was how it was made *not* defamatory.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Defamation??? by DickBreath · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      > how can what someone *FEELS* be defamatory?

      If I were a special snowflake, and I thought you felt a certain way about me, my widdle feewings might get hurt!! And I might feel as if I had been defamed by how I perceive that you feel about me, in my over active imagination. And being a snowflake I might be in danger of melting -- thus giving rise to actual damages. Your inner feelings have defamed me. And this gives rise to a cause of action for the complaint, which is the first step of a lawsuit.

      You might not like it. But welcome to the world of today.

      Hope that helps.

      Extra ProTip for no extra charge: don't pick up stuff off the sidewalk and eat it.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:Defamation??? by forkfail · · Score: 1

      But if I don't like it, I feel that that means my feelings are hurt by your feelings about my feelings.

      So jokes on you! See you in court! :-P

      --
      Check your premises.
    6. Re:Defamation??? by Junta · · Score: 1

      A feeling can also add something. So if I make a comment and include a feeling that adds a sort of 'wink wink, nudge nudge say no more' to a normal statement, that can be offensive.

      Also, 'emoticon' started as ways to add facial expressions, and as they progressed to 'emoji' it became about ideograms as well, to state things that are concrete absent of emotion.

      For example, If someone was trying to plan a lunch, and asked me what I thought a coworkers favorite food was, and I replied with an Eggplant emoji, then that could be harassment and/or defamatory.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re: Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a little snow flame you don't have fame to begin with. I can't defame you of something you don't have in the first place

    8. Re: Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're a bit oversensitive if you think that's harassment.

    9. Re:Defamation??? by Junta · · Score: 2

      Good thing you included that ':-P', otherwise that might have been seen as a threat of malicious lawsuit.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    10. Re:Defamation??? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It isn't the emoticons but the context they are used. A wink could be a sign of approval or a flirt. Often when things get to the court emotions are normal quite high, so the emotional state of the conversation is important. The not-amused emoji Could be used to explain displeasure of an unwanted advancement, or just not finding that particular comment funny. Or it could be used as a serious face to tell them it needs to be done.

      This is often complex in a business environment where the Boss is granted power over their employees, however keeping things fun and relaxed is often a good way to get good productivity, however this could also go under the disguise the the using their Power to manipulate and hurt people, hidden under the mask of looking like a joke.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re: Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna behead you! :p

    12. Re:Defamation??? by epine · · Score: 0

      I get how certain emoticons might feel offensive to some people in certain circumstances, but how can what someone *FEELS* be defamatory?

      Says someone whose comments are so universally brilliant he (or she) has never felt justifiably humiliated, or excluded from the cool table.

      Sometimes our feelings track reality (by some wholly unexpected miracle of evolution), which you might have noticed had you been paying more attention.

      The feelings themselves aren't the defamation, they're the awareness of the defamation, which is subjective to a degree, but not so much so that anyone (normal) needs to ask why Charlie Brown is upset when Lucy snatches the football away, yet again (hint: it doesn't have much to do with back pain).

    13. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, If someone was trying to plan a lunch, and asked me what I thought a coworkers favorite food was, and I replied with an Eggplant emoji, then that could be harassment and/or defamatory.

      Only if you come up with some recognized logic or reasoning for that. Now eating babies, that might apply, but since it would be recognized as generally preposterous that nobody would believe it, then the courts would simply tell you not to protest so much.

    14. Re:Defamation??? by freeze128 · · Score: 0

      Those are not technically emotions. If you write the words "I feel" in front of your little picture, and it doesn't make sense, then it's not an emotion. Examples:

      I feel (CAR)
      I feel (CAKE)
      I feel (AIRPLANE)

      This is the problem brought on when people refuse to communicate with words, and use little pictures instead.

    15. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legal issue would be that use of emogy and recontextualize text.

      For example:
      "I'm going to kill you"
      Follow it with a "just kidding" emoji and it's not legally a credible threat. Follow it with an "i'm serious" emoji and it might be.

      When somone goes into court trying to get a restraining order on the basis of having received threats and presents correspondence, containing emoji their lawyer will have to be prepared to address claims by their opponent that the emoji make the correspondence not a threat.

    16. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are not technically emotions. If you write the words "I feel" in front of your little picture, and it doesn't make sense, then it's not an emotion. Examples:

      I feel (CAR)
      I feel (CAKE)
      I feel (AIRPLANE)

      Actually, those could have meanings to me.

      I feel (CAR) -- I feel like driving or I feel like I need to be moving
      I feel (CAKE) -- I feel like dessert or I feel hungry
      I feel (AIRPLANE) -- I feel like flying or I feel like taking a trip far away by plane

      Emoticons have their meaning by the person who uses them. Also, the reader may interpret them in the way the readers themselves think what their meanings are. To me, emoticons are vague and very subjective in communication. They shouldn't be used outside any personal or private conversation at all (but sadly people do).

    17. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the problem brought on when people refuse to communicate with words, and use little pictures instead.

      :-b

    18. Re:Defamation??? by Solandri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be clear, without the emoticon, the meaning behind the phrase in question was already ambiguous (as short, written statements like you find on forums often are). The emoticon pushed it from the "could be misinterpreted as defamation" category to "not defamation."

      So contrary to the way TFA is presenting this, the emoticon actually clarified the meaning of the written statement. Which if you think about it, is the entire reason emoticons were invented in the first place. The cases TFA cites where the meaning of the emoticon is ambiguous are cases where the meaning/intent of the written statement was already ambiguous, and the emoticon didn't clarify the meaning enough.

    19. Re:Defamation??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm suggesting that feeling insulted, humiliated, ashamed, or harassed is not the same thing as being defamed, and any notion that one might have of similarity arises only from a misunderstanding of what defamation actually is, and their lawyer would probably set them straight long before it developed into a real lawsuit.

      Feelings, by definition, cannot possibly be defamatory.... defamation requires statements about the defamed party that are presented as unequivocal truths, and must usually (although not always, under certain circumstances) be false. If person A is expressing, through an emoticon or otherwise, how they feel negatively about person B, then the statement being presented as an unequivocal truth is about person A themselves, not B... and thus cannot possibly be defamatory towards B.

    20. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get how certain emoticons might feel offensive to some people in certain circumstances, but how can what someone *FEELS* be defamatory?

      Because without the emoticon, the difference between the sentence if "this guy is corrupt", which sure is defamatory without proof ... and "this guy is corrupt, just kidding".

      By the time lawyers are arguing the legal semantics of a ':' and a 'P', you're into new legal territory.

      So, you can say "In my opinion, Trump is a crook and an idiot". And that's qualified as purely opinion. If you say "Trump is a crook and idiot", well, then those libel laws he wants to loosen up might apply.

      As soon as it presents as a factual assertion instead of opinion, it better be a true fact.

      This is why lawyers and judges are trying to figure it out. Because if they excluded the emoticons from the sentence, it could well and truly be defamation.

    21. Re: Defamation??? by houghi · · Score: 1

      No, an emoticon is a word that has its origins with emotion. It can still mean an emotion, but can be used as words. E.g " I am drinking " and plenty of others. Not an emotion, but can later be interpreted as drinking alcohol. That can be the difference in court between innocent and guilty.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    22. Re: Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, it's our resident coprophage.

    23. Re: Defamation??? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am gonna kill you. :-P
      Never knew being innocent was that easy.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    24. Re: Defamation??? by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Technically it's not an emoticon if used as a substitute for words... one is just then writing with pictures.

    25. Re: Defamation??? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      So if Junta called the cops right now and they figured out who you were and arrested you for assault, you'd feel that was a valid charge?

      Or is Junta right that providing context to suggest you statement was not meant to be taken seriously thereby eliminates the criminal act?

    26. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chinese have been communication with pictures for thousands of years. It caught on better than their former written script, and then took off. I forsee English going the same way.

    27. Re: Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They were not sueing over the emoji. They were sueing over the sentence preceding the emoji. The judge ruled the emoji indicated sarcasm. Basically law doesn't take seriously posts with a bunch of lol speak.

    28. Re:Defamation??? by Junta · · Score: 2

      Eggplant is usually associated with penis, so saying someone likes to eat penis is making assertions about their sex life.

      Basically, using slang emoji is just like using slang words, and inappropriate use can be defamatory and/or offensive.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    29. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU'RE A TOWEL!

      Wanna go get high?

    30. Re: Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry that the 2nd amendment offends you. Eat shit and die. Is that better?

    31. Re: Defamation??? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Assault is a threat of imminent violence. You can't actually do that over computer communications.

      Statements like "I'm gonna kill ____" are reasonably common and are not normally considered threats. To be a threat, it has to be some reason to take it seriously. If "I'm going to kill you" is followed by address, workplace, approximate daily schedule, etc., the emoticon isn't going to matter.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re:Defamation??? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Eggplant is usually associated with penis

      You just made that up, right?

      Eggplant is usually associated here with cooking, eating or a scene from a Tony Scott movie.

    33. Re:Defamation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggplant is usually associated with penis, so saying someone likes to eat penis is making assertions about their sex life.

      Basically, using slang emoji is just like using slang words, and inappropriate use can be defamatory and/or offensive.

      There's a problem with that, namely you have to establish that is believable as defamatory. So far, a bare assertion such as yours would result in the court acting to rebuff the claim.

      You'd be better off trying with a banana.

    34. Re: Defamation??? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Assault is a threat of imminent violence. You can't actually do that over computer communications.

      Did you write that after POTUS45 (you know - immense hairdressing bill, turmeric-coloured skin) was threatening DPRK with fire and destruction. Or, indeed after the Hawaii "fake missile alert" ?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is of course used incorrectly most of the time but actually has a well defined meaning. So, if I use ironic in a sentence which did I mean? Have the lawyers figured out what to do with vernacular English yet?

  4. Personal favorite: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8-O)-oo!o~~~~~~~~~

    Discovering that you have a tapeworm.

    (First post?)

  5. What, no scarcasm tags? Imagine my outrage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always been somewhat unimpressed with the attitude that sarcasm doesn't convey on the internet, or that someone needs to make it patently obvious so the dumb people don't get triggered.

    The reality is that it wouldn't be funny if it didn't trick a few people, and the fact that a police department felt they were being defamed by an emoji may point to the fact that they are in fact incompetent.

  6. Got One For The Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -,|,,,

    Most lawyers need to flip off and cease and desist. Terrible industry.

    1. Re:Got One For The Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -,|,,,

      Most lawyers need to flip off and cease and desist. Terrible industry.

      I see you've found the six-fingered man.

    2. Re:Got One For The Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The six-fingered man? Must be Amish.

    3. Re:Got One For The Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is definitely pleased.

    4. Re:Got One For The Lawyers by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      My name is Inigo Montoya...

  7. Are these guys serious? by redmid17 · · Score: 2

    There are literally emoji libraries where on can search the meaning. There is literally a word attached to every standard emoji (which in turn is an agreed upon ASCII representation)

    1. Re:Are these guys serious? by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I participate in a forum with a very limited number of "smileys", one of which is pretty much exclusively used to indicate disgust. Its bbcode is {crazy}. They mean what the community decides they man, not necessarily what the designers intended.

      Emojis are [poop-emoji].

    2. Re:Are these guys serious? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And if the person using it didn't research it beforehand, the meaning isn't based on that. Just like people use words wrong all the time.

    3. Re:Are these guys serious? by Archon · · Score: 1

      Using words to convey one's thoughts and emotions has become too challenging.

    4. Re:Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that people use emojis appropriately. Unfortunately, there are way too many of them, particularly the facial expression ones. I'm looking at SwiftKey's face emoji section right now and there are variants of smiling with and without an open mouth, teeth showing, eyes small or large or winking or closed, tongue sticking out, heart eyes, kissy face with and without a heart flying out, more kissy face with eye closure pointing in different directions, and that's only the "happy" ones at the top. There is no need for so many variants and the appropriate context to use each individual one of them within is often not obvious. I would never sit there and ask myself: if I am kissy facing someone, are the upward or downward closed eyes more appropriate? What kind of stupid time-burning crap is that?! Just bang out colon hyphen asterisk and tell the unnecessarily nuanced and oft-misused emojis to jump off a cliff. Lawyers are trying to assign legal rigidity to colloquial pictographs that have some definition somewhere that doesn't matter since they're ignored, plus said pictographs are just plain highly subjective plus context-dependent.

      :-* g'bye ;-) :-P~~~~~~~~~

      Disclaimer: nothing in the previous line shall be construed to imply that I want to engage in sexual relations with unnamed Slashdot readers nor that I am vomiting a rope with my tongue inexplicably to the side. By reading this disclaimer you hereby grant unlimited permission to Cthulu to slap you with a tentacle when you use emojis or tread upon my lawn. This post shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware...

      (Also: Slashdot, Unicode, emojis turn into DOS code page technicolor vomit, yay? Posting as AC because this is the stupidest thing I've ever written.)

    5. Re:Are these guys serious? by Junta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I lookup U+1F346, then I'll get that it means 'AUBERGINE'.

      It will not say it means 'penis', which is what it means 99.9% of the time when actually used.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    6. Re:Are these guys serious? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      But does anyone who uses emojis consult an emoji-dictionary before they use one? So what is their intent? What would a reader infer from the emoji in context?

      Defamation cases are already nebulous, I think the whole emoji thing is an excuse for what was already a typical problem before emojis existed.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re: Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was subjectively funny, not objectively funny.

      Also absolutely no one thought he had actually killed someone.

      Words mean things, if you are going to use them, use them correctly.

    8. Re:Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mean what the community decides they man, not necessarily what the designers intended.

      Emojis are [poop-emoji].

      Hmmm, chocolate pudding!

    9. Re: Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like when he retweeted an animated gif of himself in a WWE fight with CNN. It was objectively funny, but leftists believed he had actually killed someone, and cried about it (literally) for two weeks.

      You think that is bad? Some people haven't gotten over Obamas tan suit yet.

    10. Re:Are these guys serious? by msauve · · Score: 2

      If you have a penis which looks like an eggplant, seek medical attention.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be even muddier than that.
      Not all platforms shows emojis the same way and some programs automatically replaces certain combinations of punctuation to emojis.
      In my language it is customary to write monetary amounts as integer:fraction where fraction is replaced with - if 0.
      Writing a price in parenthesis will often lead to a ":-)" sequence that some programs translates to an yellow smileface even if it wasn't intended.
      This kind of translation is very close to the kind of auto-correction that is done on smartphones.

      Have we had any libel or harassment cases where the defendant claims that the auto-correction changed a benign text to something possibly illegal?

    12. Re: Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most written languages do not have the capacity to fully convey human emotions, and miscommunication is easy.

      I make it a point to use as few emoticons as I can. I find that works well even if I have to think more carefully about what I want to say and how I'd like to say it.

      The flip side to that is that, say, kids swapping emoticons and punctuation in frequency, aren't worth my time and get a hint to shape up, or if they fail to take the hint, get ignored. Point being, some people allow emoticons to take the place of what otherwise would have had to be well-thought-out words. That's not a failing of the language, that's a failing of the language user.

      [Trump's joke] was objectively funny, but leftists believed he had actually killed someone, and cried about it (literally) for two weeks.

      Apparently "funny" isn't objective. I could not care less about the pantsuit brigade having another temper tantrum, but that doesn't mean that if you don't agree with them you're somehow "objective".

      That's just self-serving bullshit. Incidentally the same thing that got the pantsuits booted.

    13. Re:Are these guys serious? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      The ice-cream part of the ice-cream emoji is exactly the same shape as the poop emoji. There's a great animated gif of this out there somewhere. Not googling it at work. :P

    14. Re:Are these guys serious? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you have a penis which looks like an eggplant, seek medical attention.

      I did and the nurse gave me her phone number.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    15. Re:Are these guys serious? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I don't read those dictionaries. I'll admit that I'm nearly illiterate WRT emoji. To me they seem to degrade communication as (or more) often than they assist it. And I feel it is quite reasonable that I have only a vague idea what most of them are intended to represent.

      P.S.: There may be dictionaries, but they don't constitute a general agreement. Anyone can put together a dictionary, and if a single word were a decent replacement for an emoji, then there'd be no justification for their existence.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:Are these guys serious? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Oh really, what does the "face with tongue out" mean? I can't find a definite meaning other than "it's a face with it's tongue out". What it actually means depends highly on culture and context, it could be a sign of respect in Tibet or a war cry in New Zealand or anywhere from "I'm kidding" to "I'm treating you like a child" in Westerner cultures, it connotation changes with age, even Einstein used it as a political statement and then there is that guy from KISS.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    17. Re:Are these guys serious? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Isn't disgust usually indicated by a puke emoji? Or is your forum missing that one?

    18. Re:Are these guys serious? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      There's an animated one of a smiley turning green and throwing up, but that's hidden behind a "More smileys" link. IIRC, all the animated ones are (thankfully).

    19. Re:Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was no nurse, that was Goatse.

    20. Re:Are these guys serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are literally emoji libraries where on can search the meaning.

      The problem with your suggestion is that emoji libraries only contain emoji.
      They will be absolutely no help at all in looking up the definition of an emoticon (or anything else for that matter)

    21. Re:Are these guys serious? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Using words to convey one's thoughts and emotions has become too challenging.

      Pretty much. Spoken language uses many different signs such as emphasis and tone to convey meaning which is not represented in written language. Some of that can be imparted by punctuation such as "?" or "!" but not all. Emoticons generally fill in the gaps where written language fail for conversational language where someone does not wish to write paragraphs of prose to represent otherwise simple meanings.

    22. Re:Are these guys serious? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      These are of the sub-species "lawyer" of the human race. This sub-species both thinks they define how the world works and has, at best, a tenuous connection to actual reality. Hence the described problems. (As always, with apologies to those few lawyers that doe not have these issues.)

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    23. Re:Are these guys serious? by antdude · · Score: 1

      What if it looks like a banana? My college friend called it a dongle.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  8. No shit they're confused. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    "What does the emoji known as the "unamused face" actually mean? They couldn't even agree that the emoji in question -- it has raised eyebrows and a frown -- looked unamused. "Everybody said something different"...

    Lawyers are people whose profession is to ass-rape verbal and written language to the nth degree. They can pull 1,001 meanings out of their ass with nothing more than a pile of shit with a smiley face on it.

    Lawsuit for mental distress you've caused them inbound in 3...2...

    1. Re:No shit they're confused. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Which font are you looking at the emoji in? It makes a difference.

      Emoji are ambiguous. This is largely intentional by the designers, and often by the users.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:No shit they're confused. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Which font are you looking at the emoji in? It makes a difference.

      Yes, I'm sure it can. If you ask a lawyer it's the difference between life and death. Or a handshake and rape. Add time of day and sender gender and I'm sure you can carve out another 742 interpretations, which was kind of my point here.

      Emoji are ambiguous. This is largely intentional by the designers, and often by the users.

      All the more reason they should not be something left open for legal interpretation. The defense of ambiguity should be a catch-all for emojis, full stop. Otherwise, it's nothing but more bullshit to line attorneys pockets with, and overfill an already overtaxed legal system.

  9. idiot much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but how can what someone *FEELS* be defamatory?

    defamatory
    dfamtôr/
    adjective

            (of remarks, writing, etc.) damaging the good reputation of someone; slanderous or libelous.
            "a defamatory allegation"

    "good reputation" is a FEELING

    why not try seeing what words actually mean before making an idiot of yourself?

    1. Re:idiot much? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      "good reputation" is a FEELING

      I had hoped a good reputation is from something objective, like consistent behavior with consistent outcomes.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:idiot much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reputation is a collection of factual or fictional information about past behavior, opinions or personality. Slander or libel is attaching non-factual information to reputation that implies behaviour or opinions that are against community standards, as far a average, reasonable person can tell, or illegal. That's my take on it. Ah yes, ;9.

    3. Re: idiot much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but the wrongdoing is to say things that are false that cause OTHER people to adopt bad feelings toward the subject.

      Your OWN feelings toward someone, expressed by words or emojis, are not slanderous or libelous. And you are allowed to change your feelings toward someone anytime. And OTHERS should ignore your feelings about the subject, they are of no consequence in public discourse.

      Lawyers should ignore emojis like they ignore body language in a recorded statement. It's the words and context of the statement that matter.

    4. Re: idiot much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lawyers should ignore emojis like they ignore body language in a recorded statement. It's the words and context of the statement that matter.

      It seems that the lawyers did as you suggest - it was the judge that called out ":P" and ruled the comment was a joke or sarcasm.

  10. The same thing happens with words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing new, move along.

    1. Re:The same thing happens with words by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      But emojis can create new billable hours.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  11. What is the meaning of \_("/)_/ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was puzzling over the meaning of \_("/)_/ as shown in my Chrome browser.

    A quick search with google finds me this: \_()_/ Which immediately, looks like someone throwing up their hands in an "I don't know" fashion.

    Even the humble smiley :) carries a very different face when rendered on different devices. And thus has a different or no meaning sometimes.

    It gets worse. The famous pile of poo emoji sometimes gets rendered as a horrible stinky shit with flies buzzing around it. Other times it's a happy smiley piece of shit. A very different meaning is conveyed depending how it is rendered. Perhaps quite a different one that the author meant.

    The moral of the story is. Don't use emoji. Use proper language with proper words as found in proper dictionaries. Get your spelling right and be sure the words you are using have the meanings you intend.

    Of course slashdot does not render my second example correctly. Which demonstrates my point well. :)

     

  12. What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many of us have named our penis Lord Aubergine?

    1. Re:What's in a name? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      And how many of us have named our penis Lord Aubergine?

      I named my penis after my college roommate to piss him off. I succeeded.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor Oswald!

  13. Lawyers fuckwitted parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-P

  14. Not even consistent across devices by eth1 · · Score: 1

    The best part about all this is that each device can render its own version of these things. Some variations are enough to totally change the meaning, too. (Apple replacing "gun" with "squirtgun", Skype replacing "sarcasm" :P with something that looks more like "nyah nyah, I'm mocking you" type :P, etc.)

  15. Who knew language development was circular? by ElGuapo2872 · · Score: 1

    We have finally gone back to Hieroglyphics.

  16. Re:What, no scarcasm tags? Imagine my outrage! by HiThere · · Score: 1

    The judge felt that the the text, if interpreted seriously, was defamatory, however the emoji was indication that it was not to be interpreted seriously. It wasn't the emoji that was felt to be defamatory.

    I'm only assuming, of course, that we're talking about the same case. The linked article listed several cases.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  17. Re:What is the meaning of \_("/)_/ ? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    I was puzzling over the meaning of \_("/)_/ as shown in my Chrome browser.

    A quick search with google finds me this: \_()_/ Which immediately, looks like someone throwing up their hands in an "I don't know" fashion.

    Even the humble smiley :) carries a very different face when rendered on different devices. And thus has a different or no meaning sometimes.

    It gets worse. The famous pile of poo emoji sometimes gets rendered as a horrible stinky shit with flies buzzing around it. Other times it's a happy smiley piece of shit. A very different meaning is conveyed depending how it is rendered. Perhaps quite a different one that the author meant.

    The moral of the story is. Don't use emoji. Use proper language with proper words as found in proper dictionaries. Get your spelling right and be sure the words you are using have the meanings you intend.

    Of course slashdot does not render my second example correctly. Which demonstrates my point well. :)

    Back talking about your poop. It has been very famously been mistook for chocolate ice cream by numerous people. I, myself remember the first time I saw it wondering if it was poop or ice-cream (it was identical to the strawberry ice cream only brown)- I correctly assumed poop from the context.

    The original emoji come from Japan, and some of them are really only used by the Japanese. I think there is one that looks like there is a bit of water coming off the forehead; I forget what it really means, but I recall that most people in the West get it wrong.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  18. Peeing on beds by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Funny

    A comment on an internet message board appeared to accuse a local official of corruption. The comment was followed by a ":P" emoticon. The judges on the Michigan Court of Appeals concluded in 2014 that the emoticon "is used to represent a face with its tongue sticking out to denote a joke or sarcasm." The court said the comment couldn't be taken seriously or viewed as defamatory.

    Donald Trump paid me $5,000 to pee on him. :P
    Hillary Clinton showed me her penis at a fund raiser. :P
    Richard Gere bought a hamster off me for $300 so he could stick in his rectum. :P

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Peeing on beds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oswald McWeany is not joking. Those are true stories. :P

    2. Re:Peeing on beds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, Oswald, we do things a little different around here. Only if you get "Score: 5, Funny" we consider it a Joke, not a colon-pee ascii emoji sign...

    3. Re:Peeing on beds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a cunt :P

    4. Re:Peeing on beds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need emoji to know that you're joking.

      1) If you pissed on Donald Trump and only got $5000 out of him, then maybe it's time to start taking The Art of the Deal a little more seriously.
      2) Hillary Clinton could not possibly have shown you her penis at a fund raiser because she doesn't have one. Female lizards have cloacas.
      3) Richard Gere would never even think of keistering a hamster. What kind of cruel, disgusting pervert do you think he is? Furthermore, gerbils don't cost $300.

      In other news, judges and lawyers are complaining because they have to start analyzing context all of a sudden. This is a dramatic departure from how it used to be easy to be a lawyer, since in the English language every word has exactly one, 100% crystal-clear, objective meaning. What next, are you going to have to go to college and pass some kind of bar exam?

  19. Jayne, you ignorant slut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see the relevance..
    Someone posted a youtube video a while back with Jane Curtain and Dan Akaroid. It was a small vignette describing a newscast trying to promote the same type of thinking various people here use while publishing..
     

  20. Emoji is plural. by BenFenner · · Score: 2

    "Emoji" is both singular, and plural. Just like "sheep" or similar. It is a Japanese word; a language where all nouns are singular and plural. Can we keep the "S" out of it? I ask just this one thing, please.

    1. Re:Emoji is plural. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, will honor your request to spell emojis in the proper fashion!

    2. Re:Emoji is plural. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of luck. I fought the "it isn't emailS" battle for years and finally gave up. I keep telling the Mails Carrier to get off my lawn.

    3. Re:Emoji is plural. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Frankly I thought emoji was already plural, with the singular being "emojus", of course.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Emoji is plural. by DNAgent · · Score: 1

      I bet you’re fun when going out for sushis. ;p

    5. Re:Emoji is plural. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about paninis. Do you like paninis? Maybe just a single panini.

      Go ahead. Next time you are at a cafe, try telling your server that no, you don't want multiple panini, just a single panino. See how many pubes you find in the sandwich that is delivered to your table.

  21. Written Chinese by PeterJFraser · · Score: 1

    I see emojis as the beginnings of a new written language. Solving the same problem as written Chinese did. I see it will turn into a common world wide written language,

  22. Excellent by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Now I'll know to end all my death threats with a :P

  23. The billable rate for a Valley Girl just went up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $250/hr to...like....tell you what an emoji means in your boring lawyer stuff.

  24. PROTIP: ONLY the actual usage defines a word/emoji by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the old moronity again, of idiots believing that one day, somebody came up with a word, defined it, wrote it into a dictionary, and that, from then on, this was the definition of that word.

    In actual reality, it is the usage, and ONLY the usage, that defines a word. A dictionary is just an incomplete snapshot of that, and also outdated, the moment it starts existing.

    E.g. you know precisely, that the eggplant, banana and corn emojis are used as "penis". The water droplets are cum. the cherry is... Well, you get my drift.

    Also, PROTIP2: Emojis are not emoticons! (And actually, emoji used to refer to horizontal emoticons, as popular in Japanese, before the Unicode nutjobs ran out of things to codify, and started to just add ALL the things. [Soon, they will probably start adding the most popular memes. I mean some emojis already are like that.])

    So think about all the uses you had for :P over the years. Yes, pussy licking was the biggest one of them. Licking ice cream another. Even (-:P was used for "bro"s or rednecks (or 80s skater boys). I even had :P and :B being the "one- and two-toothed retard brothers" (known for tooting their horns ... )-:{ ... ).

    Acting like there is one absolute, fixed definition, is shockingly passive-thinking.

  25. Brawndo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply reading this brought to mind the hospital keyboad in Idocracy.

  26. I was against by JThundley · · Score: 1

    I was against replacing text and speech with pictograms before, but now that I know that lawyers hate them, I love emojis!

  27. If you can't express a thought with words by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    written in the 26 letters of the English alphabet and an occasional punctuation mark, then you didn't really have that thought at all.

    Call it the 1337 form of the Sapir-Worf hypothesis.

    1. Re:If you can't express a thought with words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran out of symbols in a math problem and jammed elvish letters into there. My poor college professor didn't recognize them as variables :(

    2. Re:If you can't express a thought with words by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Even more to the point: A mathematical idea does not exist if it cannot be expressed as a computer program in a language with ASCII characters or a markup language that expresses relationships in combinations of ASCII characters. That is to say, if you can't typeset your math in LaTeX or implement an algorithm in C or Perl or Python or MATLAB, then you've got nothing.

  28. Americans don't get sarcasm by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    In my experience online, I find Americans don't get sarcasm that is self evident to British people and this has got me into trouble many times.

    1. Re:Americans don't get sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience online, I find Americans don't get sarcasm that is self evident to British people and this has got me into trouble many times.

      I stopped making sarcastic comments to Americans (I live in mainland Europe). I realized my humor was totally misunderstood and it led to some minor conflicts. In name of political correctness, they lost sarcasm...

  29. it's like my parents try to internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, ":P" denotes sarcasm in what age groups? 80-90?