Slashdot Mirror


Working From Home: What if You Never Saw Your Colleagues in Person Again? (bbc.com)

Bryan Lufkin, writing for BBC: Throughout my career I've worked with people that I've never met in person. In theory, I could spend an entire day without meeting another human face-to-face. But could this kind of self-imposed isolation become standard working practice in the future?

Studies show that in the US, the number of telecommuters rose 115% between 2005 and 2017. And in early 2015, around 500,000 people used Slack, the real-time chat room programme, daily. By last September, that number soared to over 6 million. In 2017 a Gallup poll revealed that 43% of 15,000 Americans say they spend at least some of their time working remotely, a 4% rise from 2012. And a 2015 YouGov study found that 30% of UK office workers say they feel more productive when they work outside their workplace. How would we feel if we never had to work with another person face-to-face again? Would we care? Have things gone so far that we might not even notice?

125 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Yes please! by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope so!

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Yes please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hope so!

      Indeed. The majority of people are self-centered, self-absorbed, and self-important. As such people are not interested in introspection, personal growth and change, they tend to also be petty and small-minded. Maybe it has always been this way. Generally, the workplace is the only place where I cannot easily avoid such people by choosing not to associate with them. There are no benefits to this -- it is only a source of stress. Also when the slightest power/authority is involved it makes all of this worse. Rather than responsible leaders, many workplaces are filled with petty tyrants whose only concern is playing politics and looking good.

      By eliminating unnecessary social contact in the workplace we would gain much more control over our own social lives. It would make social contact a much more voluntary phenomenon, both in terms of quantity and quality. It would increase the tendency of "water seeks its own level".

      Those who want lots of contact would find plenty of like-minded company, in fact they would find they are the majority. The only thing they would find lacking is the ability to impose their ways and their personality traits (i.e extraversion) on others. This is a Good Thing.

      I can't imagine anyone having a problem with this, except maybe nosy busybodies and those with a thinly-veiled desire to control others. I guess the usual excuses would be used, ranging from "you should be forced to do X because I have decided it's for your own good", to those who are merely threatened by the fact that not everyone else is just like themselves.

    2. Re:Yes please! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hope so!

      Be careful what you wish for. Work that can be done from Montana can also be done from Mumbai.

    3. Re:Yes please! by taiwanjohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I couldn't help noticing the ironic word-wrap on the first line of your post:

      Indeed. The majority of people are self-centered, self-absorbed, and self-important. As such people are not interested in introspection,

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    4. Re:Yes please! by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm much more torn than you seem to be. I would definitely miss some because they are fun, interesting people, and others for more aesthetic reasons. A solid 50% or so I could definitely do without.

      But I've worked from home for short periods, and I can honestly say that I do get somewhat stir-crazy. I need some intellectual human interaction on a pretty regular basis. I'd love to work from home one day a week. I honestly don't know that I'd like more than that.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:Yes please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope so!

      Be careful what you wish for. Work that can be done from Montana can also be done from Mumbai.

      I telecommute from Montana to my outsourcing job in Mumbai to do work in London where they offshored work from Helena. It really stinks that when they call me from London, I have to have a fake Indian accent. And if I get a direct call from Montana, I have to fake an English accent. But my accent is really from the Northeast so I put 'R's where they don't belong.

    6. Re:Yes please! by Bigbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do work from one day a week as scheduled and have to throw an extra day or two in over the winter due to road conditions. Personally I find there's some comeraderie that's missing when you don't work directly with people. The day to day interactions that make the team a team vs 10 people who work together. When I worked at IBM, I worked on a contract for a year that was 100% work from home. And it was pretty bad, team wise. Conversations were very business oriented with no personal connection with the rest of the team. I'm pretty introverted but still enjoy being able to freely trade pokes at the team. And nothing like coming in and hearing, "oh, you weren't here when we discussed [some tech subject]" and then having to be spun up on what's going on.

      From a business perspective, yes, if you can work from home, you can work from Mumbai or Saigon. And there are benefits in that germs aren't passed around either. Plus the "wasted time" of work related socializing.

      Team Building exercises. Going out with the guys at lunch or after work. Eventually, like at IBM, you're just a cog in the machine, easily replaced by someone in Mumbai.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    7. Re: Yes please! by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

      tl:dr but the headline would be a dream come true lol

    8. Re:Yes please! by greenwow · · Score: 1

      I felt that way until we closed our local office, and I had to start working at home. I live in the Seattle area, and AC is rare here. I don't think I've even ever been in an apartment or condo that had it. It sucked working all day last summer in the heat. Also, your home workspace that might have worked well for a few hours a week to check email or play games probably won't be as comfortable when you're spending 50+ hours a week there. I had to buy a new desk and chair.

      Also, you're probably going to be required to use a webcam. I had to move my desk to an inconvenient place to get a good background. Coworkers with pets also have trouble with keeping them off camera. This week I saw a coworker's cat bite at the camera. It was amusing, but not very professional.

    9. Re:Yes please! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Working with good people is one of the most rewarding aspects of a job. I like to work at home but not all the time. When in the office, I almost never call anyone that is there, I go talk to them in person. Communication is often much much better face to face than telephone or video chat.

      Having strong relationships with colleagues makes it easier to work remotely when you do.

    10. Re:Yes please! by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      Just because someone works from home does not mean that they never see their colleagues in person. Most remote people will still fly into their headquarters or regional location once a quarter or so.

    11. Re:Yes please! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I kinda like the separation of work and home life. I also kinda hate the commute.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Yes please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help noticing the ironic word-wrap on the first line of your post:

      Indeed. The majority of people are self-centered, self-absorbed, and self-important. As such people are not interested in introspection,

      Yes this is usually what happens when you make an observation about the shortcomings of people. Somebody tries to be witty/clever yet does not even attempt to address the substance of the post. The moderators usually reward this behavior.

      Well, let's be honest. Between the "safe space" types and the "my tribe vs. your tribe" fanboys, it's extremely difficult to have even a fact-based discussion about a "hard science" topic around here. Something abstract with an empirical yet subjective element, well, I wouldn't expect much better.

    13. Re:Yes please! by PPH · · Score: 1

      Also, you're probably going to be required to use a webcam.

      You really don't want to see me working in my boxers. And if I really want to piss off fellow co-workers, I can arrange a teleconference with the background scenery being the deck of my yacht.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    14. Re:Yes please! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Be careful what you wish for. Work that can be done from Montana can also be done from Mumbai.

      1. Not if you need a security clearance, or even lower levels of security handling personal records, etc.

      2. Not if you need some sort of proficiency in using the English language without an accent SO thick that the listener can't ascertain that you actually are speaking English.

      Remember, quite often, if you're working from home, even in I.T., it isn't all just computer work, you spend a LOT of your time on conference and Skype type calls.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Yes please! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I need some intellectual human interaction on a pretty regular basis.

      Isn't that what Slashdot is for?

    16. Re:Yes please! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Personally I find there's some comeraderie that's missing when you don't work directly with people. The day to day interactions that make the team a team vs 10 people who work together. When I worked at IBM, I worked on a contract for a year that was 100% work from home. And it was pretty bad, team wise. Conversations were very business oriented with no personal connection with the rest of the team. I

      Work is work...and while there is some human, personal interactions required, for the most part, it should really only be business...after all, you are "on the clock".

      I've been working completely, 100% from home for about the last 3+ years.

      It is great....I don't miss getting up at all to dress and drive to work. And my commute wasn't even that bad and had private parking, but it still meant I had to get up much earlier to get dressed , ready and drive, etc.

      My commute now, I wake up about 5 min before I really need to work...and my commute is across the hall to my office.

      I've seriously been considering asking my CPA if I can write off t-shirts and boxer shorts as work attire.

      Being a home worker doesn't mean you have no interactions with your fellow workers....I find myself quite often in MANY teleconferences throughout the day, so, I"m on the phone with and skyping with co-workers all day long, most of them all over the US, and I've never seen their faces before. But..I don't have to.

      And it isn't like work "friends" are real friends. I tend to segregate my personal life from my work life, and even when I worked from offices, I didn't fraternize with co-workers off hours, I have PLENTY of real friends for that. I find it best to keep things purely business like on the job front.

      Its also nice to be able to play music as I wish, or even have CNBC on in the background to hear what the market is doing while working...

      And really, I find that the business, actually gets probably more work out of me than they used to when I had to physically show up!!

      Since I can monitor things more easily from home, or can jump on whenever I have an idea....I likely get more done working from home.

      And working from home...I don't have to take off to be there to meet a deliveryman for a signature package, nor do I have to take time off work, to be home for repairmen to come in to do work...etc So, I actually likely take less time off!!

      At the very least, the time I do take off..is 100% for my vacation...and not because I had to be home "to let someone in"...type stuff.

      rom a business perspective, yes, if you can work from home, you can work from Mumbai or Saigon

      You're the second person I've seen mention this.

      If you work a job requiring some level of security clearance, or some type of Federal job for the most part, you have to be a US citizen, which is nice.

      Also, you are likely also on the phone a LOT, and you really do have to have good English skills without a too thick accent so that you can convey your part of the meetings in an easy to understand manner, especially since they aren't there in person to see you.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Yes please! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      When in the office, I almost never call anyone that is there, I go talk to them in person. Communication is often much much better face to face than telephone or video chat.

      On the other hand....working from home, I'm not constantly being interrupted by people walking up to my cube to "chat"....or converse about stuff that has nothing to do with my work, and breaking my concentration.

      Working from home, I can answer people at my leisure on breaks from concentration.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:Yes please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People who are self-centered, self-absorbed, and self-important are blind to their issues and conditioning. Introspection helps in keeping the issues from spilling all over the others. I therefore can't see the irony in that part of the other AC's post.

    19. Re:Yes please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just spent 20 minutes at the office today, telling a bouncy young fresh college intern graduating this spring.about an open source project in her field that I wrote before she was born. It's the best thing to happen to me all week, because I could focus my attention entirely on her without HR thinking I was stalking, while I got to brag and look at her going "squee".

      That... loses a lot over a telecommuting conference call. I could have pointed her to the work on github and the original announcement more easily, but I *really enjoyed* that she was physically there. I work 100 feet from her, now I have an excellent excuse to see her again in person and enjoy it on *so many* levels.

    20. Re:Yes please! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I welcome this. It's a chance to share knowledge and to mentor others. I'll also admit that I _do_ prefer having an actual office rather than a cubicle to work from. It allows an "open door policy" to mean something, and to close the door for a private meeting if needed. Since I sometimes discuss security sensitive projects, or NDA material with clients or colleagues, it's been very helpful. The ability to see their faces and reactions can be invaluable: it can carry subtle excitement, or shock, that does not come across easily on a chat or a video conference.

    21. Re:Yes please! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1
    22. Re:Yes please! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You can't find that in Mumbai, but you can find it in Manila, and in Mexico, especially now that Donald is deporting the dreamers.

      Hey...so, they'll have a job when they get back home...win win!!

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re: Yes please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Introverts are crippled now? Yes, blindly assume someone has a defect because they aren't like others. Not everyone needs constant approval from an outside person. If we go the route of diagnoses, extroversion could easily be painted as insecurity and loneliness.

      Some people just don't like hanging with people just to flap their lips. It doesn't mean they're damaged or otherwise lesser. It's that belief that leads people to not engage with extroverts.

    24. Re:Yes please! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Or Malmö.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    25. Re:Yes please! by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Use a green screen and matte in a background. One week a yacht, next the Taj Mahal, the Pyramids, Seychelles...

    26. Re:Yes please! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      If there's anyone else in the world who does what you do. Guys who can crap out some Javascript and glue together 15 different frameworks with code from sourceforge are a dime a dozen. How about someone who can write a targeting system for a laser? A SPACE laser! Oh, by the way, they'll need a clearance. And something something ITAR. Good luck finding one of those in Mumbai!

      And yes, I'd be happy to write your space laser guidance system at home. After the last "Bring your child to work day," the entire office shut down with the dire flu for an entire goddamn week!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    27. Re:Yes please! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      1. Not if you need a security clearance, or even lower levels of security handling personal records, etc.

      Yeah, competition is for those private sector saps.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:Yes please! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And keep upping the weirdness if nobody calls it. Ten Forward, The Moon, Mordor...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    29. Re:Yes please! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I hope so!

      Indeed. The majority of people are self-centered, self-absorbed, and self-important. As such people are not interested in introspection, personal growth and change, they tend to also be petty and small-minded. Maybe it has always been this way. Generally, the workplace is the only place where I cannot easily avoid such people by choosing not to associate with them. There are no benefits to this -- it is only a source of stress. Also when the slightest power/authority is involved it makes all of this worse. Rather than responsible leaders, many workplaces are filled with petty tyrants whose only concern is playing politics and looking good.

      By eliminating unnecessary social contact in the workplace we would gain much more control over our own social lives. It would make social contact a much more voluntary phenomenon, both in terms of quantity and quality. It would increase the tendency of "water seeks its own level".

      Those who want lots of contact would find plenty of like-minded company, in fact they would find they are the majority. The only thing they would find lacking is the ability to impose their ways and their personality traits (i.e extraversion) on others. This is a Good Thing.

      I can't imagine anyone having a problem with this, except maybe nosy busybodies and those with a thinly-veiled desire to control others. I guess the usual excuses would be used, ranging from "you should be forced to do X because I have decided it's for your own good", to those who are merely threatened by the fact that not everyone else is just like themselves.

      Even with what you claim of individuals, man is a social animal. He needs the comfort to rub shoulders with peers, to exchange some thoughts in private, to enjoy a meal with a friend, and to learn from friends and offer help to friends.

      No man is an island that can remain in isolation. There are the givers in life, and the takers in life, and they need each other. The generous man who gives to charity, vs the takers who build islands made from spoils of taking.

      If you are in a relationship, can you live in a single room together with your partner for 24 hours per day.

      I have watched individuals go through breakdowns, because of solitary work. It might have happened to me, but I chose to go into the office one day per week on the minimum. That way, I met my work at home peers, we ate lunch together and we felt human. The organization became real, and did not feel like an automaton.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    30. Re:Yes please! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Working from home will not preclude the need for contact with your co-workers.

    31. Re: Yes please! by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      If I found a company that provided private offices for programmers, and was located somewhere nice like the urban parts of LA or Miami, then I would totally consider working on-site.

      Alas, the typical software job involves sitting in a horrible open plan office or a cube farm; and is located in a soul-crushing suburban office park in a God-forsaken hellhole like Northern California.

    32. Re: Yes please! by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      "need some intellectual human interaction"

      Then hang out with an intellectual crowd in your free time. You sure as fuck aren't going to find that at your average office.

    33. Re:Yes please! by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I hear Sauron is a tough boss...

  2. The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best summary
    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/working_home

  3. WFH was so much more productive by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    The one place I was at that allowed work from home saw me being much more productive. No cubicle drive-bys. No distractions. No ruckus from the surroundings.

    A pox on those short-sighted employers who insist on chaining us to the stupid desks. Seriously. I hate it.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:WFH was so much more productive by xevioso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The jury is still out. Working at home allows you to complete tasks on your own time and in your own environment where you are presumably less distracted.

      But you also lose the ability to have face-to-face collaboration, which is very important in certain industries. Scheduling a skype meeting is different than chatting with someone in the hall about what might be needed or expected for an upcoming project. There's a reason a lot of deals and agreements get made in person, and people have had the ability to meet via "video-conference" for decades now; yet face-to-face contact is stil preferred in certain situations.

      I think it's often best to have it both ways...to come in for meetings sometimes, but to work at home for projects that require intensive work.

    2. Re:WFH was so much more productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of the people I know that work from home are more productive but they eventually get shit on because of office politics. The employees that are physically at the office every day have social opportunities and form relationships that, unfortunately, make a huge difference when it comes to career advancement.

    3. Re:WFH was so much more productive by malachid69 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think the jury is still out. I have worked from home off and on for decades. In my current job, I was going into the office every 6 weeks until recently (haven't been in the office in probably 6 months). Since that also involves flying there and back, one week in the office is about as productive as one day at home. I'm not being facetious about that - I'm just considering burn down and tickets that actually get closed out.

      While I do understand the desire to have face-2-face whiteboarding sessions, that's rarely what we are doing.

      We use conferencing (Hangouts and unfortunately also WebEx at the moment) daily for an international team. While it may take a minute or two to start a chat online, when onsite it usually takes much longer to find each other AND an available room. Half the time, we crowd around one monitor anyway.

      However, the less distracted assumption is also not really all that true. Even ignoring things going on at your own house (deliveries, pets wanting fed, etc), you still get constant distractions from meeting invites and slack conversations. The only real difference is you are less likely to be pulled into a meeting or an off-site lunch.

      You'll probably find that how you manage your project has a bigger impact than a lot of that. How many administrative meetings are you having? How many scrums and retrospectives and grooming sessions and artificial deadlines etc?

      All that being said, I do tend to turn down onsite jobs anymore because I don't want to waste 2 hours a day of unpaid time commuting.

      --
      http://www.google.com/profiles/malachid
    4. Re:WFH was so much more productive by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      The one place I was at that allowed work from home saw me being much more productive. No cubicle drive-bys. No distractions. No ruckus from the surroundings.

      A pox on those short-sighted employers who insist on chaining us to the stupid desks. Seriously. I hate it.

      I was more productive working from home when the kids weren't around. Now they (and the wife) are too much of a distraction. In the case of the Mrs. she used to be understanding that I was working when working from home. Now she isn't and doesn't treat me as if I'm at work not to be bothered. My family is also far too messy, and I can't work in a dirty environment. At home, there are no wife and kids to junk up my desk or leave plates and mugs everywhere and empty packets of crisps all over the place. I'm sure there is something psychological there- but if I'm in a cluttered messy room I just can't work.

      Family aside. Back in the old days when family wouldn't bother me if working from home, I found that if I were working from home just a few days, my productivity would skyrocket (partially because I was really driven to get extra work done when home so people wouldn't think I was goofing off). One time when our office flooded and I had to work from home for a few months that began to change, in a long stretch it became harder to concentrate and be as focused.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:WFH was so much more productive by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Well yeah if you're comparing working from your bathroom to spending a whole day to travel to the office, of course it's going to be more productive. Realistically though I haven't seen any conclusive studies on productivity but I'd imagine it would be pretty similar on average with one or the other being better for some people or some types of work.

      What I can say for certain though is that it's absolutely a determent for career development because you don't get to network with anyone outside of your immediate team. And even within the team everything is on a pretty strict "need to know" basis so you get only a vague idea what the hell everyone is doing every day. Somebody might see this as a feature but personally I find this limiting.

      My team is in 5 countries around Europe and I'm the only one based in my office. I can, and usually do go there daily so I actually get out of the house, can socialize a bit (even if it's mostly bullshit about weather) and use the gym. At the same time, it's also great that I can telecommute whenever I want or need. For a week I even worked from SE Asia where I effectively extended my vacation by chilling on the beach in the morning and working in the afternoon.

    6. Re:WFH was so much more productive by Strider- · · Score: 1

      The jury is still out. Working at home allows you to complete tasks on your own time and in your own environment where you are presumably less distracted.

      I'm absolutely the other way. At home is where all my distractions are: All my projects that are waiting for me to finish, my computers/games, my local pub, my cat, and so forth and so on. I get very little done while I'm at home, where as at work, the only distractions are from coworkers, and that I can deal with.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    7. Re:WFH was so much more productive by kschendel · · Score: 2

      Wow. You're either trolling or have an awfully limited acquaintance. I have no distractions at home (just me and my wife and she leaves me alone, no TV no radio in my home office). I get in at least 3-4 more good hours per day than I can at an office. I've worked from home for going on 20 years now and I guarantee nobody questions my productivity. I'm a lot more tempted to goof off when I'm visiting one of the offices.

      I don't pretend to say that working from home is for everyone, or every job, but when it works it's a HUGE win. And in my company it works a lot.

    8. Re:WFH was so much more productive by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      No, you're just living in denial. There is NOWHERE in the world with more distractions than my home. TV, radio, projects, family, pets. I get 10% of what I get done in the office when I'm at home. And that ratio is what I generally see in all my coworkers too. I have never, in 17 years of working with people doing it, seen it work from a productivity standpoint. I've seen it work from a retention standpoint, but always at a loss of at least 50% productivity.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  4. open plan office??? by ArTourter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well I think one of the causes for this is the insistence from upper management that open plan offices are a good idea and impose it on every one but themselves.

    the result is that people need to find a quiet place from time to time to not be disturb so that they can concentrate on a specific task. And when putting headphones on, not answering email immediately and so on don't work any more because people just come by your desk and stand there until you give up and talk to them, the only solution is to simply not be there!

    1. Re:open plan office??? by Octorian · · Score: 3, Informative

      the result is that people need to find a quiet place from time to time to not be disturb so that they can concentrate on a specific task.

      This reminds me of a time when I needed to take a private phone call, which you obviously cannot do at your desk in an open-plan office. So I walked around the entire building, and every single conference room was occupied by "one person sitting in front of a laptop." I think I eventually found some corner by a stairwell.

    2. Re:open plan office??? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> every single conference room was occupied by "one person sitting in front of a laptop." I think I eventually found some corner by a stairwell.

      Grow a pair. Here's how you do it if you're just a newbie.
      1) Find a junior-looking guy/gal whose conference room you want
      2) Look up that conference room and book it for just you in whatever system you use
      3) Go back to the conference room and ask the person to beat it, asking them to check the room reservation if they want
      4) Sit down with your laptop in your private conference room

    3. Re:open plan office??? by ssyladin · · Score: 1

      Of course all the nonsense about increased collaboration (and thus productivity) around open floor plans has been debunked. The reason upper management keeps doing it is because it is cheaper. Office floor space is expensive per sq ft. Most businesses lease office space, and do it in multi-year blocks. That's a nice hard, fixed expense every month and one you that can be difficult to change.

      Personal offices, even shared ones, are expensive per square foot. You have more wasted square footage with passageways, doorways, etc. Walls are expensive to build, electrical lines to run, etc. It also takes time to build those walls in a new office space, which is time you're often paying the lease but not getting to use it.

      Hell, even high-walled cubes are more expensive that the more "modern" low-wall, more "open" floor plans.

      Offices are plain expensive, and not flexible if your business needs or organization change. It is much easier to justify the hard dollar savings of moving to an open floor plan than to acquire & build walls in a space, especially since you can get more (1.5x - 3x is my raw guess) more people shoved in the same fixed cost floor plan. And it is really hard to show hard dollar lost productivity from distracted workforce in an open floor plan.

    4. Re:open plan office??? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, companies are in denial about open plan offices and the cost to productivity. My customers put me in one, but I have my home office where I usually work. I never actually took a full-time job that forced me to have one. At Pixar and other places I always insisted on a room with a door. And probably nobody wanted to share a room with me anyway :-)

    5. Re:open plan office??? by nevermindme · · Score: 1

      You do not even have to book it. Just read who booked, introduce yourself and claim you are or showed up to meet that person for a 1 on 1. Either that person will be so shocked they will claim a mistake and run for the hills or you have some networking time with another real player.

    6. Re:open plan office??? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Or learn to share a large room with one other person?

    7. Re:open plan office??? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I prefer open plan with a dozen people to cubicles, except when needing to video conference, for which rooms are available. But then I am good at ignoring distractions to the extent that when focused people have problems getting my attention.

  5. Depends on the job by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it really depends on the job. There are clearly some where being left the hell alone and not bothered allows a person get much more accomplished, never mind all the time saved from the commute to work.

    However, I can't imagine having something like a writers' room that works anywhere near as effectively if everyone is video conferencing in from home. Also anything that requires a lot of specialized and expensive equipment doesn't seem workable in that manner either.

    However, if you could have 20% of the current work force working from home it would likely make traffic far more bearable for the other 80%.

    1. Re:Depends on the job by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      However, if you could have 20% of the current work force working from home it would likely make traffic far more bearable for the other 80%.

      There's a risk that the other 80% might then move further from work over time for other reasons, and traffic would return to the same inconvenient level, and then if the 20% tried to go back it would be much worse! I find the 80% already have more tolerance to an extent that baffles me, but then I can walk to work in 45 minutes, cycle in under half that.

  6. I'm in that situation now. by spywhere · · Score: 1

    I have severe degenerative disk disease. My manager used to unofficially accommodate my disability by letting me work from home, but then another manager decided to make an issue of it...
    Long story short, I had medical documentation, I could prove the previous accommodation, and I had a decent lawyer. I never need to set foot in the office again.

    ...and I can't, even if I want to, because going in would provide evidence that I no longer need the accommodation.

    1. Re:I'm in that situation now. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      ...and I can't, even if I want to, because going in would provide evidence that I no longer need the accommodation.

      Hey, just because someone managed to get there in person once on some special occasion shouldn't prove it would not be excessively burdensome for the employee to set foot there on a daily basis.

      Not all disabilities that are required to be accommodated are 100% disabilities.... some conditions can vary ---- some conditions involve discomfort or pain as a burden that can be carried infrequently enough for an important enough reason, and some accommodations are about limiting the exacerbation of certain conditions ---- For example, possibly a daily commute would be out of the question, but infrequent trips for essential purposes might be Ok.

    2. Re:I'm in that situation now. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Jesus, AC. That was harsh! And on top of that, Backblaze just released their 2017 report, and you didn't even work that in.

      FOR SHAME, AC! FOR SHAME.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:I'm in that situation now. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      'solid state'

      wrong shape.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:I'm in that situation now. by spywhere · · Score: 1

      I don't trust them to see it that way, and my lawyer advised me to avoid giving them any excuses. That manager is still making life Hell for others who had been telecommuting merely because it made sense, and I've heard it really bothers her that she lost the confrontation she provoked with me.

    5. Re:I'm in that situation now. by antdude · · Score: 1

      I also have disabilities. I loved working from home 100% when I was a contractor for Cisco for 1.5 years/18 months. I am still unemployed since then and having problems getting hired because of my multiple disabilities. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:I'm in that situation now. by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor

      Wouldn't it be more like;
      Velociraptor=Dinstantiraptor/Tempusraptor .... or something?
      And yes that is totally on topic.l

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    7. Re:I'm in that situation now. by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      The interwebs ate my UTF symbol.
      make that DeltaTempusraputor

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
  7. Digital Persona .... by Luthair · · Score: 1

    sounds like an article from 15-years ago from someone obsessed with Second Life. Makes one wonder how little qualifications are required to advise government officials.

  8. Must socialize ONCE IN A WHILE by mi · · Score: 1

    I loved working from home, when I could, but occasional socializing in person is still a must. Neither e-mail, nor IM, nor audio can properly convey all the subtle details of smiling and other body-language. Smilies, emojis and memes are a crutch... Video is better, but it is still not as good as the real thing.

    As a result, for example, your rejection of a genuinely bad idea can get easily misconstrued as meanness or vendetta against whoever proposed it. People slowly grow to resent each other — meeting in person, whether for work or just for a "happy hour", is crucial to maintain good relations.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Must socialize ONCE IN A WHILE by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Our team is facing going virtual at least by next year, when the move to a new building will force evaluating needs and we may not show a need for seats.

      We already know that a weekly Skype team meeting will not be enough. I expect 3 of 6 will transfer, and I'll be stuck with the ones lacking in drive, and my manager will book space daily to avoid being isolated.

      And I'll save 2.2 hours a day commuting, face interruptions every 20 minutes to 'please....', and eventually go virtual at Starbucks when I've finished the multi-monitor stuff.

      I don't like virtual, but it will give me the excuse for even faster Internet service at home, a better chair, and generally a huge office space upgrade. And I can maintain relaitonships with the truly important coworkers, since they are already in New York, Greensboro, Montana, Gurgaon, Brighton, and Brisbane. I have never met most of them, and the few come here yearly for a party.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  9. I am in that boat now and can't be happier by bigdady92 · · Score: 2

    My nearest collegue is 100miles away, we all work remote, we get together once every 6 months for a 'company' meeting to recall who everyone is.

    Beyond that there is NO reason to be in the same office as everything we work on is scattered globally and we couldn't even PHYSICALLY touch the systems if we want to (READ: CLOUD), if the systems fall offline we call one of the big 3 and they go look at down systems. Other than that we keep the systems running and go on about our day.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:I am in that boat now and can't be happier by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I've worked from home for almost 15 years. I live in a rural area of the mid-west where the cost of living is low and it saves me a boat load of time and money on the commute. I still have to keep my office professional and wear decent clothes because instead of people walking into my office I have skype popping up constantly and I still see people with video conferencing multiple times a day.

    2. Re:I am in that boat now and can't be happier by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

      This is the thing most people don't realize they HAVE to do. I put on office clothes even though I've moved 20' from my bed to my office work area. This makes me FEEL like I still am in a work environment and productive even though I'm nowhere near the office.

      --
      Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:I am in that boat now and can't be happier by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      We sometimes joke that people are wearing boxers and dress shirts.... since you can only see above thier desk in the video conference.

    4. Re:I am in that boat now and can't be happier by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      On working at Automattic on WordPress: http://scottberkun.com/yearwit...

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  10. Again? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    More likely, for the first time.

  11. It would be like old times with Debian by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was Debian project leader - is that around 20 years ago now? Time flies - I had around 200 regular collaborators who were the package maintainers at that time. They were distributed worldwide and we never met. We made a great distribution that worked and got on the Space Shuttle for two flights. I ran into Ian Kluft at a ham radio function, and eventually was invited to Europe to speak and met some other developers. But I have still never met many of those 200.

    1. Re:It would be like old times with Debian by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      But I have still never met many of those 200.

      Never met many of the 200? This is Madness!

    2. Re:It would be like old times with Debian by maitas · · Score: 1

      I just want to stop by to thanks you for your work. RESPECT !

  12. Wokplace harrassment allegations eliminated. by mschuyler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like a solution to every working man being accused of sexual harassment for looking at a woman. Then if your spouse sues, at least t's community property.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Wokplace harrassment allegations eliminated. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Somewhat off-topic, but I like to joke about how "I know how women feel" when I'm on a video conference. Because when I talk to them, I find them staring at my chest.

      No, not really. They're looking at the image of me on their screen. That image happens to be a few inches below the camera. So they're looking a few inches below my face.

      One thing I've been debating doing is using the TV on the other side of my office as a fourth screen exclusively for video conferencing. Go buy a camera with a slight zoom capability and mount it on top of the TV. Adjust the camera so it is pointing to where I'd sit at the desk and zoom it in slightly to show just me (and not the rest of the room). This way I can look at the TV and see who's talking and my eyes will at least be focused in the general direction of the person talking rather than a few inches below them.

  13. Love it, but I still "See" my colleagues virtually by Coldeagle · · Score: 1

    I've been working from home for about a year now, and honestly I love it. I am a software developer, so it makes sense for me to have quiet and minimize interruptions. As a result, I'm more productive (because I can just turn slack off when I don't want to be interrupted, harder to do in an office environment) and I get to spend more time with my family instead of an hour or more on the road on a daily basis. We use Zoom constantly and we try to make it a point to turn on our camera's so we can actually see each other and interact. That makes a huge difference to me, since it allows me to feel like I get that daily interaction with folks.

    We also make twice yearly homages to HQ and I would be ok with it being quarterly honestly. We go to our HQ for a week and get some stuff worked out that's easier to do in person. The team building aspect of those times actually feel like they mean something as well. Previously, team building events didn't mean much because they were with folks I interacted with in person everyday.. Now I feel like they make a larger impact on myself and my colleagues because that time is so much more valuable.

    Just my two cents

  14. Not for me by servo335 · · Score: 2

    I feel less productive working from home. Way to many distractions including turning on a tv and to many temptations. Plus i think i would miss the humans.

    1. Re:Not for me by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Home is for home. Home is not for work. When I've worked from home, I've found that after awhile I have no home--only work. Hours start to get weird, etc.

      Unfortunately, the company I work for is 3000 miles away.

      My solution is to rent an office. It's a whopping four mile commute--I can drive, bike, walk, or ride the bus, depending on my mood and what's going on that day.

  15. Re:Margaret Thatcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    thatcher was a fucking nazi bitch and I hope her soul is burning in hell

  16. I'd rather not... by haibane · · Score: 2

    No thanks. I don't want to be a keyboard warrior. Human interaction usually improves your mental state too https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...

  17. 8th year at home by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 2

    I love working from home. I don't miss humans face-to-face. I still need contact via phone and IM and that happens daily. I am a programmer, and our people are mostly distributed, so an office generally doesn't make sense any more anyway. But I hate it when the big bosses come up from head office and I have to go to the office. Totally wasted dead unproductive time.

    The other thing is, I never need to print anything at home - I can get by with stuff on the screen. When I worked in an office, I was always printing white papers and documents. The trees love me now.

  18. We don't need offices. by michael5727 · · Score: 1

    Offices are redundant and counterproductive for information workers. Technology has made obsolete the burden of relocating ourselves geographically every day—at great expense in terms of time, money, and stress—to shuffle data around computers at (nearly) the speed of light. I'll readily concede that in-person collaboration is valuable, but hardly a constant necessity. Let's stop blocking roadways, wasting energy, and building surplus office space. Let's meet face-to-face only when needed, and otherwise work in comfortable, distraction-free environments that're a short walk from our breakfast tables. I've been working from home for almost five years. It's made me happier and more productive, and that should be a norm.

  19. Re:I don't see people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hello fellow coder.

    I have been where you are, poor, living out of my car, I saw winter approaching and knew it would potentially mean my death.

    Working for free must end, work for money.

    I found work by going around sites like kijiji and looking for key words like javascript etc. This would lead me to small or medium sized businesses who were looking to hire coders so that they could have a GUI for interacting and manipulating their database of clients, warranties, etc.

    I hope you do not die.

  20. Fuck Slack by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    IRC and Jabber are where the cool people play.

  21. Tax employers for employees commute by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    For jobs that are entirely theory based, I can see that happening (like writing software on the web, or accounting, or a number of other jobs). For jobs where you must physically interact with a product or customers, not so much. On the flip side, many employers have countless incompetent managers who only feel comfortable when they can look over your shoulder and see that you are in fact working, regardless of how productive you are, or if you just switched screens from solitaire.

    The only way I can see a mass shift of theory based jobs to permanent offsite status is if states and/or the federal government eliminate the gas tax, and instead charge the equivalent amount of taxes to employers based on the number of employees they require to be onsite each day. For example:

    100 employees onsite multiplied by the average commute for the state = X number of miles driven round trip = Y number of state and federal taxes incurred to maintain the roads.

    The more employees allowed to work from home, the lower that tax liability. This moves the regressive gas tax burden for highways from employees to employers, and gives them an incentive to use the roads less. You may not think it is much, but for example, in California the average commute is 27 minutes one way, assuming an average speed of 60mph, thats a daily round trip of 54 miles. The California gas tax is currently $0.42/gallon, and assuming the average commuter gets 27mpg (because I'm lazy and that's probably close to average for the entire commuter fleet), that's $0.84/day. Factor a premium for using the roads during rush our for an additional 130%.
      Multiply that by 260 working days per year and each employee and the business would be paying $568/employee per year to the state and $250 to the federal government. If you have 100 employees, you are looking at about $82,000 in taxes each year that a company could save by letting their employees work from home (to say nothing of other direct overhead like electricity, air conditioning and office space.) Obviously transportation companies (semi shipping, taxi services, etc.) would have to pay based on actual miles driven for the company, including commute and on the job.

    This is one tax burden that is legitimately the responsibility of companies and should be paid for by companies, rather than employees.

    As more companies let workers telecommute to save money, the added benefit of less congestion, fewer accidens and less road wear are also realized.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  22. Depends on the person by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    I think the desire to is also dependent on the person. For myself, its pretty much a yes please. I could go for vast stretches without physical contact, in fact while I work in an office now, I'd said most of my interactions are already digital anyway. I have some overlap in what I work on with the physical people around me, but not a great deal either. Every now and again it is kind of interested to go to some large shared meeting or conference and put a face to a name. I've had working relationships with folks for like 10 years, and then meet them at some seminar which is kind of fun. So I don't think I would be really all that put out if working from home and rarely if ever met anyone. My partner however is more of a social type worker. When facing a prospect of taking a job where she would have little or no physical contact with many people she balked at it, and ultimately rejected the idea, looking elsewhere. For her she would need the constant social contact to stay interested with the job, where her job satisfaction is as much about who she works with than the actual nuts and bolts of what she is actually doing. For her that kind of isolation would be unbearable.

  23. Never seen = easy to lay off by Danathar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When you never see somebody, then the personalization goes down. I'm all for teleworking, but not 100% telework. If your boss never sees you, its probably a LOT easer to lay you off.

    1. Re:Never seen = easy to lay off by PPH · · Score: 1

      With some people, seeing them makes laying them off just that much easier and enjoyable.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  24. You might get a free trip to Mexico by Chaset · · Score: 1
    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  25. Well... by daq+man · · Score: 1

    ...then I wouldn't be home sick like I am now because someone came to work sick.

  26. I don't hate a lot of things by mohsel · · Score: 1

    but boy do i passionately hate working in openspaces! who the hell thought that putting a bunch of people with different job dynamics in one big room would be a good idea ?
    people talk, answer phones, tell stupid personal stories, make jokes....while other ones are trying to think and do problem solving and conception.

    Home office increases productivity, makes savings for everybody. i'v been involved in projects with people working from home and everything went smooth. so yeah, i would't bother not viewing my colleagues in person again (for working purpose in the workplace, i mean some of em are cool)

    1. Re:I don't hate a lot of things by Rande · · Score: 1

      From research done in the 70s showing that roving managers walking up and down the aisles makes typists work harder and less prone to slacking off.
      Coders are just glorified typists right?

  27. Not for me by b0bby · · Score: 1

    In theory I could be almost 100% remote, but I prefer to be in the office and interact more naturally with my colleagues. I do the odd day remotely, and I usually get some project that I've been putting off done then, but I wouldn't want to be remote more than one or two days a week tops.

    It helps that I can walk to the office, of course.

  28. Re:I've been asking to do this for years by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    If you're a sysadmin, your physical presence at the office is a comfort for all who work there. If any system goes down or has a problem, it's reassuring for them to know that you can look into it at a moment's notice. Employees often wonder if offsite admins are even available, or are working.

  29. Second time working 75% remote, travel 25% by ssyladin · · Score: 1

    I'm in the same boat again now as I was about a decade ago. Both times I moved with my family to a place far and yon, but came to an arrangement with my employer to work remotely from a home office. Both times I travel back about 20-25% of the time (roughly once every 4-6 weeks), mostly to maintain social contacts. And that's the key if your larger project time is 25 or so people. After a certain size, and with the general workplace turnover, people in other groups with whom you interact are just cogs. I've worked on-premise at one software firm and never personally met the DBAs, even though they were a floor down. Wouldn't have mattered if I were next door or in Timbuktu.

    But with the smaller companies / organizational units, where jobs are primarily "other duties as assigned", the importance of having person-to-person contact & socialization is immense. Especially if you're the odd duck who is primarily remote, and everyone else is in-office. It allows you to stay abreast of relevant business "gossip" that isn't always officially communicated, and to understand both the working style & unofficial responsibilities of your coworkers.

    Johann

  30. I'm practicing remote working right now. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    My goal ist zu slowly move into Tim Ferriss/4HWW territory. I usually like my colleagues, don't stay long with people I don't like that much. But I'd very much prefer a surfing beach right near my working spot. Or some nice powder snow to get into some snowboarding.

    My goal is to go digital nomad in the foreseeable future without missing a beat income wise. Could work out.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  31. Re:I've seen the worst by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

    This is fascinating, but I don't believe any of it.

  32. been doing this for years by Nick · · Score: 1

    Been working from home for years. I get so much more work done than being around people. I could care less for human interaction, that's what the neighborhood bar is for.

    --
    Fuck Ajit Pai
  33. Probably as good as a triple whopper cheese/bacon by Kjella · · Score: 1

    As in going full-on gluttony working in my underpants which would be fun at first but eventually becoming one of those fat slob/shut-ins. What I like about work socialization is that it's totally casual and a secondary objective to getting a paycheck. If socialization is the primary objective then I feel the pressure to be interesting enough or they'll be moving on, not just dates but friendships too and I'm not great at smalltalk. I've hardly ever befriended a total stranger, it's like we've been classmates, studied together, worked together, played at the same sports team or had some other reason to hang out for a while which has warmed up into friendships.

    That said, I don't think the socialization has much to do with work or feeling like a team. As in I could totally see myself working in some sort of shared office space where we'd have different jobs for different companies and still do lunches and water cooler talk and goofing around a bit together. A lot of the people I work with do other bits that I don't really know much about and they don't really know that much about what I do anyway. And when we're on a break we don't really want to talk about work anyway. The whole "pulling together" thing is a bit overrated for me, I work because I got pride in what I do. I'm not doing it to save my colleagues' ass or for company deliveries/profits.

    An analogy I've used is that if we're a ship then I'm the one setting the sails. I'm not the captain or navigator, though I'd certainly advice or caution them if I think they're making a mistake. But if we're sailing off a cliff that wasn't my decision, my responsibility or my blame and while I'll certainly try to help I'm not putting that burden on my shoulders. We're certainly a team setting the sails and it's not competitive, but I'm not going to cover for the screw-up again and again. Honest mistakes and inexperience yes, but not incompetence, recklessness and slacking. If you're not weeding out the obvious problems but covering for them and collectively punishing us for their failures that's highly demotivating for me.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. Re:Depends on the job (and need for communication) by davecb · · Score: 1

    With a recent plain-ordinary-development project, I was in the office four days of the week to try and keep an intuitive "handle" for what we were doing, and would save up concentration-dependant tasks for home on Wednesdays. That worked well, for me.

    Another engineer worked strictly from home, and had dispropriately more trouble than I.

    A third worked from a remote office, and quit our project to work with the people who sat at the next desks.

    I suspect this fits one of a family of U-shaped curves, with "bad" at both end of the U and good in the middle, but with quite different shapes for projects with different co-ordoination needs.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  35. Working from Home Works for Me by Striikerr · · Score: 1

    My wife and I both work from home (for different companies). No more sitting in traffic or getting stuck on a subway (all wasted time). I never cared much for hanging out with co-workers (one reason I decided to work on networking and servers is I rarely have to deal with people). Another upside is a reduced risk of getting sick. If you aren't jammed on a bus or subway train with 100's of other people (some of whom are sick), you stand a much better chance of avoiding catching whatever they're spreading (although my kids do keep me exposed to whatever they catch at school so..). The benefits of working from home outweigh the benefits of working in an office in my opinion and extensive experience.

    Working from home does require an amount of discipline in terms of working without supervision.

  36. Capitalism works too well by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    The dirty secret of capitalism is that it is not meant to work as a stand-alone; it requires some kind of social order. Since the 1960s we have abolished that social order and in its place added regulations and doubled the number of people in the workforce. The result is that most jobs are bullshit and can be done in four hours a week most weeks, but we have to be there looking busy for 40-60.

    As a result, people are taking their work home so that they can really jam on actual problems and ignore all the bullshit, meetings, paperwork, silliness, etc. It's just more efficient. And if they did not see their colleagues again? No one would care. Only the really sad and lonely find their jobs important. For the rest of us, it is just what is demanded of us to pay in order to live, and we secretly resent it and the people who try to cheer us up by talking about "having a case of the Mondays." We would never socialize with these people if we were not forced to, which is why such people love jobs.

    In the future, everyone will be a contractor who gets a retainer to be on-call and is paid by the hour, will work from home, and probably pay a lot less for work clothes, commuting, insurance, etc. Plus you get to be around your family and possibly, work a small garden so you can get actual food, since the stuff in the stores is mostly overpriced toxic gunk.

  37. 20+ years in, still loving it by asackett · · Score: 2

    I've been at it since 1996 and I've met only two of my clients -- and only one of them intentionally. My code works, their credit cards work, that's enough.

    AFAIC, commuting unnecessarily is an irresponsible act.

    --

    Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

  38. Offices need to improve by nicolaiplum · · Score: 1

    If people prefer to work away from the office, the office needs to improve.

    The news here is not that home working is wildly superior.

    The news is that modern offices are terrible. Noisy, crowded, lacking in privacy, environmentally inadequate, poorly located for employees to travel to.

    Meanwhile, some people can't handle working at home and develop severe mental problems from the lack of social interaction so it's hardly a panacea.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
  39. Let's see.. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    The guy next to me is a paleo / vegan / crossfit enthusiast. The guy over from me is an evangelical christian who's trying to save me and the guy behind me has a distinct love of curry / chili / who fucking knows...

    I'M totally ready to work from home Mon-Fri. I'm even willing to sneak in on Sat. to rack servers.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  40. Have been doing it for 6.5 years by madbrain · · Score: 1

    It's really not a panacea. I work from California but 95% of my coworkers are abroad, in India and Australia. 0% are in my local office.

    Tools like IM, audio/video conference, email slack are no replacement for being in the same room with another person, and never will be. All those communications have to be scheduled. Communications are slowed down way too much. Things get misunderstood. There is nothing like dropping into somebody's office to discuss an issue and getting it resolved immediately.

    --
    -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
  41. I have experienced both alternatives by MpVpRb · · Score: 2

    After I left my last full time job, I worked for 10 years at home

    I loved having control of my schedule
    I loved being able to work when I felt inspired, even if it was at odd hours
    I loved being able to take a few hours to do other stuff that needed to be done
    I loved avoiding traffic and parking
    I loved avoiding silly meetings, especially the crap required by HR

    Most of all.. I loved the absence of distraction. When I closed the door of my home office, I could focus
    I got a lot of stuff done, and was paid well

    But, I kinda missed the human interaction
    I'm an introvert with no social skills, but I still missed being a part of the society of engineering

  42. I've been doing this since about 2008. by Chas · · Score: 1

    It can be nice at times. You don't have to deal with anyone on a bad day, nor do they.

    The fact that this cuts down on your exposure to illness is a nice bonus too! I've been generally healthier (as in not getting the flu/colds, etc) since starting as a telecommuter.

    Not dealing with some crappy, underpowered machine is a nice bonus.

    And the amount of money I save on gasoline is PHENOMENAL. I literally put less than 3000 miles a year on my vehicle (and my insurance company has a discount for low-mileage owners).

    On the downsides (however).

    You have to put REAL effort into enforcing a work/life balance.

    It's quite possible to work yourself into the ground in front of your computer.

    You have to make an effort to get up and walk away for a couple minutes to simulate breaks at work.

    It can be VERY difficult to take lunches as this kind of setup encourages "al desko" dining.

    Additionally, the fact that you're primarily interfacing with co-workers via text (we use IM to communicate) can lead to some major aggro. Instant Message does NOT mean "Instant Reply". And some co-workers and bosses have a REALLY hard time grokking this, expecting you to simply drop EVERYTHING and fence with them in IM for an hour.

    So, you have to work at establishing and maintaining boundaries. One of the ones I'm working on right now is a co-worker who likes to play "hot potato". If I'm simply not available, they call a client up, get them set up, then simply transfers them to me. Regardless of if I'm working on anything else or not...So *I* have to either drop what I'm doing or broom them, which makes us look like shit.

    So, it can be a sweet gig.
    But you have to remember it's still "work" and you have to treat it as such.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  43. I'd prefer a mix by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    An extreme either way seems unnecessary

  44. Work at home but prefer the office by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    I started working from home a few months ago because I moved. I must say, I prefer being in the office. I like the interaction and I like the physical separation of "working" and "not working". At my request my manager installed a big monitor and a camera in my team's work space, so I still get some office interaction. We just keep a constant video connection up during working hours. Others on my team also work remotely but prefer to limit contact to email and Slack. Whatever works for you and whoever you have to interact with.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  45. Funny by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Why working at home is both awesome and horrible - The Oatmeal

    I know everyone will be impressed that I know how to make an HTML link. Such technical knowledge!

    Hey! TARGET="_blank" works on Slashdot now. Didn't maybe 2 years ago.

  46. This is me. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    This is my work life in a nutshell. I've never met my boss or any of my co-workers -- they are several thousand kilometres away. My employer has offices all around the world, but not in my city, so I have no office to go to even if I wanted to. Even my interview was over the phone (although I should note I was already an employee of the company at the time, and the position was tailor-made for me).

    The work gets done, and so my employer is happy. I have time to take care of things at home as needed, such as picking up my daughter from school. I can work from wherever I want, so long as I have online access. I could move across the country, and wouldn't need to find new employment. I can work in my pyjamas and slippers. I have a fully stocked and equipped kitchen at my disposal.

    Frankly, I've had to turn down some offers and interest from some pretty big, well known companies, because they simply can't match my current work environment. Every day I can't help but feel like one of the luckiest guys in the world (for a working stiff, at least).

    Yaz

  47. Am there now by Teunis · · Score: 2

    I'm there now.
    And as a bonus, my daughter is growing up with me quite near and accessible, and is surprisingly good company when working. (she's 3 now, and I've been home for 2 of those years)

    Every now and again I miss the social - but I could just start getting out to social gatherings again to handle that.

    And yeah, my coworkers are everywhere on the planet. It's pretty awesome sharing weather stories, for instance. The only real downside though is sometimes I'll forget to stop working and work into timezones on the other side of the planet.
    I probably put in more hours now than when I commuted, and have a higher quality of work output.
    but my home life is happier, my social life's pretty ok and I'm all in all a lot happier.

    So yeah, I'm there. No regrets.

  48. I want to try if if it means the end of SJWs by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Finally, no way to claim that your career problems are due to racism, sexism and homophobia. Everyone is the same online and nobody is grabbing anyone else's body parts. Rise up on your merit and if you don't, you only have yourself to blame.

  49. Psychological effects? by Charlotte · · Score: 1

    I've been working from home for about 15 years, and in concert with US colleagues while living in Europe. As a result I was working night shifts constantly -- meaning I spent much of my time alone and in darkness.

    Since that time I've grown increasingly isolated. Some time ago I had a nervous breakdown.

    I'm not sure that working from home constantly is very good for your health...

    1. Re:Psychological effects? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      Right now, I live on the US East Coast but work remotely with a group on the US West coast. I am trying to keep "California" time to be available to the rest of the group -- which is shifted by three hours. So I tend to start work around noon or a bit earlier and work to around 8 pm (20:00) or so (often a bit later).

      I also usually do my best focused work in the morning, sometimes starting as early as 6 or 7 am -- so that is one downside as far as work productivity (but an upside to other things I do).

      So, on the plus side, I get a lot of morning time to do what I want -- and it is high quality time. On the downside, it is always dark at the end of the day.

      I also tend to treat around 3 pm to 4 pm as a sort of lunch hour since that is California lunch. I sometimes walk the dog then.

      Even after more than a year of this schedule, the shift still is a bit strange feeling to me.

      Fortunately, my wife and kid are night owls, so this actually brings me more in sync with their schedule in a way. But since I am working later, I don't otherwise get to spend as much evening time with them. And I'm a lot more worn out at the end of a day when I do finish work.

      I used to go to sleep around an hour or two before midnight. Now I usually go to sleep around midnight or 1 am. That is a big change for me. And it may be reducing my total sleep time some.

      I can't imagine trying to bridge 6+ hours between Europe and the USA though. That would be like me starting at 3 pm and working to midnight. I might be able to do it, but it would be really strange and I don't know how long I could keep that schedule up.

      My wife as a night own has the opposite challenge from you because she often works with people in Europe. It is tough on her as a night owl and very disruptive of her sleep to get up for a 9 am meeting with someone in Europe. She might do well in your situation. I tell her she has to get more clients for her consulting in California instead of Europe. Either that or (purely theoretically) we should move to East Aisa to make her schedule easier with clients so she could chat with European clients in her afternoon and evening -- but then my schedule difference would be terrible.

      This web page says are early morning "larks" (10%), people in the middle called "hummingbirds" (70%), and then "night owls" (20%). They have some tips on trying to adapt to different schedules from your preferred one.
      "Are You a Lark, an Owl, or a Hummingbird?"
      https://www.nasw.org/users/lla...

      If you are by any chance a "lark", a big shift forward is going to be much harder than if you are a "humming bird" or "night owl".

      Good sleep is very important to forming memories. Lack of sleep also affects neurotransmitter production and sensitivity.

      The light from screens is disruptive to sleep if you are staring at screens late at night. That can be improved a bit by wearing glasses that block blue light or by using a utility program like f.lux which makes computer screens redder in the evening.

      Taking vitamin D3 supplements can help mitigate some of the heath problems of lack of sunlight exposure.

      Eating better (whole foods, mostly plants -- with enough omega-3s, B vitamins, and iodine, and other good stuff) can help with mental functioning too. See "the Whole Foods Diet" book for more ideas on that.

      Also, being out-of-sync timewise by several hours with the rest of your local society is going to be worst for a young unmarried person otherwise actively doing a lot of social events. Same with any work-from-home situation that is more socially isolating.

      The time shift may not make quite as bad socially when you have family around you. That said, if we did not homeschool with a flexible schedule, and my wife and kid were not night owls, I can see how even just a three hour timeshift would be more isolating from family. And six hours would be very hard.

      Still, sometimes other options are possible. I used

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    2. Re:Psychological effects? by kwthom · · Score: 1

      When I was working, we had the opposite situation - our customers were in Florida, so it was best to be on their clock. So, getting to work at 5:00am or 6:00am means we'd have ability to interact with them. What was bizarre was getting a question at 4 or 5p local time. "Don't you have a life??"

  50. 5 years and counting by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

    I've worked from home now for 5 years and never want to go back to an office daily. The work I do, though, has been setup such that working from wherever actually "works". We have a central system to plan the work, open communication channels on Slack, Skype for Business, or even phone calls (haven't gotten one in about 4 years, though). There are a few things I've learned:
    1. You have to be okay with people just dropping in on you via Slack or something similar. The only time you can't allow it is when you're in a meeting or really working heads down on something complex. When someone pings, you respond. It's the digital analog (oxymoron) to passing in the hallway...
    2. You need to be flexible about your time. Getting a ping at 7pm has to be okay with you if you're working with people from other time zones.
    3. You do need occasional team get togethers. These are great for everyone, including the folks who actually are in the office. I used to go to the office for a week per quarter, and now it's more like a week every 6 months. 3 days is probably enough, but there has to be some face time. The best for me would probably be 3 days per quarter, but I can live with my current setup.
    4. I, personally, have to have people around me, so I work from Starbucks or the library quite a bit. I'm fortunate in that I don't have a lot of critical meetings, so the background noise hasn't hurt me yet. I think a co-work place would be even cooler, but I don't have one around me and I'm afraid they'd be more expensive than my $2.50 cup of coffee a day.

  51. My own experiences working onsite and remotely by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    I totally get what you are saying. I work from home right now and have found modern open plan or even cubicle-based office spaces to be very distracting from concentrating on programming. People who do focused intellectual work need an office with a door that closes (one thing Microsoft got right in the early days). Ironically, managers who are always talking to others and are out and about tend to be the ones who get offices these days. And especially the offices with windows (putting workers in office space without windows is illegal in some other countries like Switzerland).

    One place I worked an insurance company with cubicles mixes with uncubicled desks), the guy at the desk behind me (we were back-to-back), working in another group, had just had a house built -- and was on the phone constantly with contractors. Very distracting. Though I learned a bit about house building. Then I got moved to a different desk as the group I was in consolidated its office space usage. In that company, having one of your cubicle panels replaced by glass was a sign of promotion to management rank. My new desk was just on the other side of a corridor from the project lead's cubicle -- which had just had a glass panel installed so he was literally staring at my back all day (as well as the backs of a couple other developers). I would have preferred the previous desk over that situation even with the chatter. You try to do your best anyway, but it all takes its toll on concentration and being in the flow.

    One lab I worked in, the third lab I was in at IBM Research, a very loud computer with a squealing hard drive got put right next to my work space for a while. I complained about it, but to not much good. That noise made it very hard to concentrate. I've had tinnitus ever since too -- though it is hard to blame tinnitus on one specific event. Possibly that was the last straw in a series of noise exposures from my youth inclduing early work in a Princeton robotics lab where we noisily cut styrofoam with an industrial robot (and should have been wearing ear protection but usually did not).

    That said, a diet of whole foods, mostly plants, has lots of health benefits -- although Paleo leaves out healthy grains and has too much meat and fat to be that healthy (see the book "The Whole Foods Diet"). Exercise whether Crossfit or just less extreme going for good walks is also a great health booster. Spirituality and community also has proven health benefits. And lots of studies show that Turmeric in Curry also has great health benefits. So, your coworkers are all tapped into different aspects of health.

    I also very much enjoyed having lunch with coworkers and learning from them. For example, that project lead was into gardening and even made his own delicious salsa. Another person sitting near my at the insurance company told me (when this was not common popular knowledge in the mid 1990s) about how real wages had been flat in the USA already for decades. And I learned a lot at lunch listening to stories about IBM Research history from my supervisor working in a different lab there.

    I also later "worked from home" for a year for that previously mentioned insurance company. But that seemed only feasible within that organization where essentially no one worked from home because I had been a contractor onsite earlier for a year. And I would go in for meetings once a month or so. That was before cheap good laptops, and while the project went well, I can see how otherwise things might have been even better if I would have gone in once a week or so to work there and have lunch with people. In the meantime we had moved from where I could walk to work in ten minutes to where I had a 45 minute drive plus often-challenging parking to get there, so getting there was a bunch harder -- but not as hard a commute as other places I would work later even as it seemed daunting at the time.

    So, while as a programmer, I'd make the same choice you would of working from home, I can see there is also a potential loss there of lea

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  52. Sure by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "What if You Never Saw Your Colleagues in Person Again?"

    I'd be okay with that.

    I like going into the office once in a while, but I'd be fine working 100% from home. Right now it's about 50~60%, but not having to make the drive a those few days a week when I do go in would be great.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  53. Re:I don't see people by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Well, how many paid open source coding jobs are there?

    More than you might think. A lot of Linux code comes from corporations these days - Intel are the major one but RH and IBM are up there.

    I will add that it's one too many.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  54. Networking by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Great in theory (well, the work bit) but managers favour people they like (eg people like them). Drone #212 is going to have to do an awful lot to get noticed and in the meantime, there might be somebody in the same office, not as good, but happens to sit next to the right people and support the same football team.

  55. Re: NO OFFICE ROMANCE by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    What industry do you work in? Back when I was consulting, I had the displeasure of visiting a couple dozen software offices in several states. Aggregate number of appealing women in all those offices combined: zero. The software industry is a desert.

  56. Slack doesn't mean WFH... by McPierce · · Score: 1

    Using Slack, or similar messaging apps, hardly means the people are working from home. I've worked for quite a few companies where some form of messaging app was used to let developers, BAs, etc. stay in contact without having to look up from their desks.

    --
    Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"