Slashdot Mirror
FCC Report Claims Broken Broadband Market Has Been Fixed By Killing Net Neutrality (vice.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: The FCC has released a new report falsely claiming that the agency's attack on net neutrality is already paying huge dividends when it comes to sector investment and competition. Unfortunately for the FCC, the data the agency is relying on to "prove" this claim comes from before current FCC boss Ajit Pai even took office and doesn't remotely support that conclusion. The Trump FCC's latest broadband deployment report [concludes] that "advanced telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion." That claim comes despite the fact that this same data also shows that two thirds of U.S. homes lack access to 25 Mbps broadband from more than one ISP, resulting in numerous broadband monopolies in markets nationwide.
An accompanying press release goes on to claim that "steps taken last year have restored progress by removing barriers to infrastructure investment, promoting competition, and restoring the longstanding bipartisan light-touch regulatory framework for broadband that had been reversed by the Title II Order." The FCC has repeatedly tried to claim that the FCC's 2015 net neutrality rules devastated sector investment -- despite the fact this is easily disproved by ISP earnings reports, SEC filings, and numerous CEO statements to investors. That hasn't stopped this FCC from repeating this claim anyway, apparently hoping that repetition forges reality. "The problem: these deployments aren't new, and industry watchers note that they all technically began under the oversight of the previous FCC," Motherboard concludes. "All of the examples provided by the agency cite deployments that predominantly occurred in 2017 as the result of obligations attached to mergers or subsidies under the previous Tom Wheeler-run FCC."
An accompanying press release goes on to claim that "steps taken last year have restored progress by removing barriers to infrastructure investment, promoting competition, and restoring the longstanding bipartisan light-touch regulatory framework for broadband that had been reversed by the Title II Order." The FCC has repeatedly tried to claim that the FCC's 2015 net neutrality rules devastated sector investment -- despite the fact this is easily disproved by ISP earnings reports, SEC filings, and numerous CEO statements to investors. That hasn't stopped this FCC from repeating this claim anyway, apparently hoping that repetition forges reality. "The problem: these deployments aren't new, and industry watchers note that they all technically began under the oversight of the previous FCC," Motherboard concludes. "All of the examples provided by the agency cite deployments that predominantly occurred in 2017 as the result of obligations attached to mergers or subsidies under the previous Tom Wheeler-run FCC."
Rewriting history was always the norm. Problem is, now we're trying to re-write the present.
Repeat the same crap often enough, and people will think its true.
Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
... the people in rural areas who are most negatively impacted by the lack of readily available broadband will fall for this.
Big Brother has increased broadband speeds from 25 mbps to 10 mbps! Hooray Big Brother!
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
...dog bites man. Wake me when there's really NEWS.
right? Show up for your primaries folks. Otherwise you'll have the same choice of Right wing corporate Dems and right wing Rs. Also, and I know this isn't a popular idea, but this _is_ a partisan issue. The Republicans are opposed to government regulation and want to leave the free market to decide (massive subsidies not withstanding) while the Ds, when they're not being actively bought off (again, show up at your primaries people) support government regulation with the aim of general societal improvements + correcting imbalances in the market. What I'm saying is, if you vote R you shouldn't be surprised when they don't want to regulate. They told you that in their party platform.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Welcome to the Trumpverse. Where everything smells like shit because Trump's WH is shit.
A powerful party in Mexico, that tried to be the revolution that would change the country. As they would fail to reach their goals, they would instead have a party paper that would change the facts, just until they could actually improve things. After years of this the party began to believe the lies the manufactured. The people did not. Things went badly for them. Not nearly as badly as it went for the ruling elite in a small country called France. One can hope change comes soon to America.
25 Mbps? Good grief. I carry on a technology career with half of that, but sure, I guess people need to watch GoT in 4k (or whatever) or else we're violating their natural rights. It's a shame no one is looking out for my latency...
By taking it away the FCC caused millions of last mile miles of fiber to be instantaneously laid to all the rest of the people in rural areas. Presto, magico!
Sadly this will allow for the spread of more fake news so the president wisely cut the cord.
Bananas have begun growing exceptionally well all across the US.
Fake News from the Libertards at Communist Slashdot.
The need for community broadband in areas that can afford network costs, fast broadband for gated communities is what will drive the post NN rule changes.
Groups and communities able to cover the costs of networks will finally be able to create their own regional networks without been stopped by federal NN rules that ensured existing monopolies would have been the only networks.
Why should a community just have to keep paying for paper insulated wireline NN monopoly that covers a part of the USA?
With their own funding local communities can build out a new network in their community, pay for design and connect to a ISP that can offer great service.
No more having to go back to some state or federal NN approved monopoly NN ISP.
A community that has to get state approval from some state bureaucracy because some local politician wants to add to NN rules in their state?
Instead of building a local network and getting connected, some state official has to inspect the new community network and see if it fits in with local politics and state required NN party political "rules".
With the NN federal rules relaxed the USA had a chance to innovate new local networks and services. Thats now been replaced by party political NN rules at the state level.
Once again communities that want to build new networks have to prove that are NN ready to some gov in some states.
Only the big existing monopoly telcos will be able to provide that NN compliance to state governments.
State governments move back in to protect their party political friends who have a NN ready telco monopoly.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Profit!
This is Fake Report.
FULL
OF
SHIT!
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
>> falsely claiming that the agency's attack on net neutrality is already paying huge dividends
It probably really is already paying huge dividends, just exclusively to the board and shareholders, not the customers.
has always been at war with eurasia
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Current FCC policy is paying Yuge dividends, Yuge I tells ya!
In fact, under Obama, zombies were walking the streets, killing and raping. Mexican zombies! With Me and Pai, honeysuckle grows in verdant groves, fountains gush with mead, and bluebirds sing the national anthem.
Can I tell you how I squashed the Dictator of Darkest Korea? Or how I personally defeated ISIS? My policies are single-handedly responsible for bringing down the Imams of Iran!!!
And black people love me! There are so many black people who are employed now who just love me!
If you tell a lie often enough, gullible people will believe it.
Meanwhile, in a court of law, you'll get sued by the attorney generals of the states that know you're lying about broadband and competition. Because they deal in facts.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
When the broadband companies took all those federal subsidies to increase Internet broadband, they used their own "creative" definition of what broadband Internet should be and dumped all that money into cell service. My guess is whenever they talk about Internet service, they're still counting stupid phone data availability.
Someone off this guy already.
Unlike 99% of Net Neutrality posts on Slashdot, this one wasn't 100% screeching hair-on-fire non-reality.
In this case the FCC is right. Net Neutrality IS the problem. Killing it was the solution.
by kicking Ajit Pai in the balls.
Obviously not for the consumer since abuses and bad service from providers are still happening.
Further proof of God's favor is when cabana boy rand announced how a secretary was so pleased about the recent tax package, because her paycheck increased by a little over a dollar a week. Winning baby - this is it. Vote Republican and get an extra coffee at Starbucks once a month!
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
"Hey, we fixed broad band by allowing Cable companies to filter your network traffic....oh, and we redefined what broad band means by saying anything over 5 Mbps is broad band....yay merica! All hail Fuck Face Pai."
Who would pull Ajit Pai back from the street if he was about to get hit by a bus?
Should be flogged, flayed flensed, and maybe even fired too. In fact the entire lobbying industry and their legislative underlings in congress, the senate and the white house should get one big final "Republican Marriage".
Then maybe we could finally have a chance to actually fix the damage they've done without them stalling the next administration until they steal the elections yet again.
Anyone interested in this topic needs to read the actual report. There the FCC goes through the numbers behind its conclusions and the legal requirements that it faces when going about its analysis.
But more importantly, the FCC report simply doesn't come to the conclusion that Slashdot reports here. In fact it explicitly says that there is more progress to be made, and that it was a lot more than Network Neutrality stuff going on last year.
The report is a fine report that we should be able to get behind, as it promotes efforts to expand Broadband to more people.
Missreporting like this is not helpful.
Here's a link to the report:
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_pub...
If you read the report, it goes through times when it's including cell data and times when it's not. It also lays out exactly why it's making those two choices as required by the laws that tell the FCC what to do.
It's all spelled out in the report.
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_pub...
The emperor isn't wearing any clothes.
Man promoted by liar turns out to be a liar. Wow.
"Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
Egads I feel dumber reading those "news" articles, and even dumber comparing them to the FCC release.
If you are having some issues with this summary, which any reasonable person would, go and compare them to the actual FCC release. While the FCC release is about the USA as a whole the news articles are almost entirely on the areas with the issues, and the quotes and numbers they use are from the FCC talking about those issues.
In this case the articles focus on remote indian land and conclude that since they don't have the same access to high speed internet that is available in Manhatten that the FCC report is a lie.
That's why there is no competition in the internet markets where I live. You either take Charter, which is good 100meg down and shitty 6 meg up internet or you go to shit&T and pay more for less speed. I'm sure some places that have 1 gig connections are happy but seriously Charter. Why the fuck can't we get a decent upload of 10 or 20 megs? Why must the upload be 6% of our download speed? Utter shit. The real irony is you can call and upgrade your speed..lol. Yeah you can go to 200 meg down and get the same exact upload. What the fuck is that shit?
because the rural voters are a reliable source of votes for Republicans and, well, he's a Republican. Everything Ajit Pai (and his party) does is to further their own ends. Once in a blue moon those ends cross paths with someone besides themselves and their corporate masters. That shouldn't distract you from the overall fact that they're screwing us all over for profit.
Some things in life really are black and white. Fact are facts. I'll say it again, this _is_ a partisan issue. The sooner you realize that the better.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
GWB and CRAB tried to pass all their lies off by incessantly repeating them through their official propaganda outlet, Fox News. AND forced the mainstream media to to do the same or be completely shunned and shut out of everything. The public probably still believes Saddam was behind 9/11 and not just an inside job to incite the nation to go to war against most of the the middle east. All lies cast aside and the bare truth made known ..
So it cracked down on collusion between ISPs to not compete in the same neighborhoods?