Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Roadster Elon Musk Launched Into Space Has 6 Percent Chance of Hitting Earth In the Next Million Years (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit shares a report from Science Magazine: SpaceX CEO Elon Musk grabbed the world's attention last week after launching his Tesla Roadster into space. But his publicity stunt has a half-life way beyond even what he could imagine -- the Roadster should continue to orbit through the solar system, perhaps slightly battered by micrometeorites, for a few tens of millions of years. Now, a group of researchers specializing in orbital dynamics has analyzed the car's orbit for the next few million years. And although it's impossible to map it out precisely, there is a small chance that one day it could return and crash into Earth. But don't panic: That chance is just 6% over a million years, and it would likely burn up as it entered the atmosphere.

Hanno Rein of the University of Toronto in Canada and his colleagues regularly model the motions of planets and exoplanets. "We have all the software ready, and when we saw the launch last week we thought, 'Let's see what happens.' So we ran the [Tesla's] orbit forward for several million years," he says. The Falcon Heavy rocket from SpaceX propelled the car out toward Mars, but the sun's gravity will bring it swinging in again some months from now in an elliptical orbit, so it will repeatedly cross the orbits of Mars, Earth, and Venus until it sustains a fatal accident. The Roadster's first close encounter with Earth will be in 2091 -- the first of many in the millennia to come.

150 comments

  1. chance by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    I'll chance it!

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:chance by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I agree. I will take my chances and if in the next million years a car falls on me. Hey Free Car!

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    2. Re: chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's gotta be one expensive car insurance policy. wonder if he has collision.

    3. Re:chance by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      As someone on the internet recently said, "Thanks to Elon Musk there is now a non-zero chance of getting hit by a car in space."

      Having been someone on the internet who has said this, and not remembering the source, I'll take credit for this insightfully stupid comment.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re: chance by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      You've got to love the title of the actual article: The random walk of cars and their collision probabilities with planets. As if that were somehow a normal field of study, generalized so it can be applied to other cars as well.

    5. Re: chance by asalazar · · Score: 1

      Joke's on them. My car has collided with a planet way before the Roadster.

      --
      Slashdot: Where the sig outsmarts the comment
  2. Insurance? by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    I hope he has collision

    1. Re:Insurance? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I hope they can remotely update the car with improved collision DETECTION.

      How awesome a publicity stunt would it be in 2091 if the car comes shooting straight at the earth, strikes through the atmosphere, and then grinds to a sudden and inexplicable halt 10 cm above the planet's surface?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Insurance? by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make that a '58 convertible corvette with some bitch'n heavy metal music playing and you might be on to something....

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:Insurance? by HACG0012 · · Score: 1

      o yeah u all right sportscentre4u

  3. It will probably get picked up by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

    before 2091, as being space junk and a hazard to interplanetary spacecraft.

    That's if Elon's dream of cheap spaceflight and interplanetary travels becomes reality.

    1. Re:It will probably get picked up by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You know that interplanetary space is actually pretty big, right? Is there any reason you think that this elliptical orbit will ever be a major space lane?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:It will probably get picked up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any reason you think that this elliptical orbit will ever be a major space lane?

      Space isn't like the movies nor an ocean Mr. Martian. There are no "lanes" but planes of use between two or more ever moving points.

      This car is on such a plane of travel.

    3. Re:It will probably get picked up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that point the car may have a fairly high monetary value as a relic

    4. Re:It will probably get picked up by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      There are no "lanes"

      Well...technically... But even Hohmann orbits are likely to prefer a subset of possible transfer trajectories. Those with particularly low energy are often sought after.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:It will probably get picked up by tsqr · · Score: 2

      before 2091, as being space junk and a hazard to interplanetary spacecraft.

      That's if Elon's dream of cheap spaceflight and interplanetary travels becomes reality.

      2091 is 73 years away. 73 years ago we were just wrapping up World War II and competing with the USSR in grabbing up some German scientists to seed the US space program.

      Good thing the car will burn up on re-entry, though. A lot of commenters seem to think that "6% over a million years" means "6% AFTER a million years", when it really means "there's a 1 in 16 chance of this thing crossing paths with the Earth sometime in the next million years." All we know with reasonable certainty is that it won't happen in 2091, because until then the orbit is predictable. After that, I'm sure astronomers will be watching it with interest every 73 years. "The random walk of cars and their collision probabilities with planets" is an interesting read, if you don't mind a PDF.

    6. Re:It will probably get picked up by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of Hohmann transfer orbits. Between two particular planets, they all have nearly identical energy. Space is big and little things like roadsters will never hit each other. The planet earth is different because size + gravity gives it substantial cross section to collide with.

    7. Re:It will probably get picked up by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      [...] is an interesting read, if you don't mind a PDF.

      Whoa, you're kidding, right?

      What in god's name other kind of format would anyone want for reading a serious scientific paper???

      PDF is, seriously, the only way to go for something like this. If you do mind a PDF, there's something wrong with you in the head.

    8. Re:It will probably get picked up by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, asteroids *do* occasionally hit each other. It doesn't happen every day, but we don't really have a real good idea of how often. Often enough that we can observe the after effects, but we can only see that when two large chunks collide. For the smaller pieces...we can be sure it happens because there are a lot more of them, and even the larger pieces collide, but we can't really observe.

      OTOH, frequency... it's probably rather rare, and most of the collisions are at low relative speeds. Fender-benders are a lot more common then head on collisions. But occasionally things will hit each other at a large enough angle to shatter. I don't know what occasionally means, it might be once every thousand years for something the mass of a car. Or it might be less frequently.

      Yes, space is big, and there's a lot of space on the average between things. But most things are about in the plane of rotation, and resonance effects tend to shift things into similar orbits and ... well, when things are nearly co-planar and the eccentricities are different, eventually a collision is likely. Of course, eventually can take a very long time, but with millions of pieces of stuff orbiting around they do happen.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:It will probably get picked up by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of them but if you prefer certain alignments, they're going to get unevenly distributed. It's a minor nitpick, admittedly, yes.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    10. Re:It will probably get picked up by edjs · · Score: 1

      What in god's name other kind of format would anyone want for reading a serious scientific paper???
       

      Screen caps of a series of tweets posted to Facebook.

    11. Re:It will probably get picked up by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      I kinda like the idea of the car coming around every ~70 years to run over a bunch of orbiting satellites though. I also like the idea of it being a target to capture with prototypes for orbital mining companies.

  4. As long as it doesn't have the Locnar by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    I am fine with it.

  5. Why "reclaim the Tesla" prize? by swb · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of surprised Musk didn't grandstand a bit and offer a large prize for reclaiming the Tesla intact, like $100 million or something?

    It would obviously cost more than that with today's tech to actually pull it off, but it would be kind of amusing if in 20 years or something someone was actually able to cobble together a robotic mission to grab it and bring it back AND turn a profit on the whole thing.

    1. Re:Why "reclaim the Tesla" prize? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Two things I can think of: One, logistics of running a prize thing like that would be somewhat hard. Often for super rare chances (we'll give you 10% off for every inch of snow that falls on New Year's day) the sponsor will take out prize insurance, to mitigate having to pay out a pile of cash. Still, making sure that you have the longevity in the contest can be hard, especially given the boom and bust of so many companies on the cutting edge these days. Two, I bet if you did it anyway and brought it back to earth, Elon would buy it back from you. Seems well within his character to do that.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  6. Re:Space junk by Tailhook · · Score: 2

    This isn't orbiting the Earth. It's no more a problem than any chunk of rock orbiting our star.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  7. But what are the chances for 40-50 years? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    After that I'll be gone and won't care.

  8. Re:Space junk by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    First, to test the rocket he had to fire something. Two, making as much of the rocket as possible reusable is cutting down on space junk. Lastly, there are numerous chucks of rock in the same type orbit, and they slam into the Earth all the time. We need to find ways to deal with them anyway.

  9. Re:Space junk by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it'll be useful as a practice target to identify for collision warning systems.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  10. Re:6% by NEDHead · · Score: 2

    Bullshit

    There needed to be a test load. Instead of a lump of concrete he used an old car. No more dangerous, no CO2 emissions from making the concrete, much more interesting, and funny for those whose sense of humor is more evolved than bathroom jokes.

  11. Awesome! by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Maybe by then there'll be enough charge stations to use electric cars effectively.

  12. Re:6% by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Why do you go out and spend money on frivolous things like meals out and movies, risking the lives of other people (there's probably a 6% of you accidentally killing one once in a million years) when you could give every extra penny you have to charity instead?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  13. Re:Space junk by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Space junk" is only a problem in Earth orbit, where it has a significant chance of colliding with other important objects. The smaller, scattered debris left behind by launches or collisions is the real problem, as it's harder to track. When the Chinese intentionally blew up one of their own satellites in an anti-satellite missile test around a decade ago, it caused a real uproar, because they intentionally created thousands of pieces of debris that would be a problem for many decades to come.

    This solar-orbiting Roadster is not any sort of real problem worth complaining about, unless you just want to grump about something.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  14. Re:But what are the chances for 40-50 years? by Major_Disorder · · Score: 2

    I plan to live forever.
    Based on my, so far very successful, plan to live forever it is a near certainty that it will hit the earth within my life time. That Bastard is messing up my planet!

    --
    First law of people: People are generally stupid.
  15. So I guess we'll never know... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    ...whether there is, in fact, a dead hooker in the trunk.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:So I guess we'll never know... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      ...whether there is, in fact, a dead hooker in the trunk.

      He doesn't have to kill them when he owns the brothel

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re:So I guess we'll never know... by Falos · · Score: 1

      No, but his nanna would give him an earful for having wasted a perfectly good pimpable employee.

      The idea came from the same place - young Musky wished he could send his broccoli into the sun without her noticing.

  16. The Reason by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    He's being celebrated because it's now Space junk, instead of Earth junk.

    You try strapping several rockets all together and try to make it work out.

    Just like Marvin, I expected an Earth-shatterimng Kaboom...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Reason by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      He's being celebrated because it's now Space junk, instead of Earth junk.

      You try strapping several rockets all together and try to make it work out.

      Just like Marvin, I expected an Earth-shatterimng Kaboom...

      No, it's only a 6% chance of hitting; that means there's a 94% chance of it landing vertically on a barge.

  17. Re:Space junk by jwhyche · · Score: 4

    Well first of all it was cool as hell. Second of all this was test of the big ass rocket they used. Normally they would use dead weight like lead or sand, but this time Musk just decided to use his car.

    An yes, there are other reasons. Mainly it was a publicity stunt for Space X. An it was a good one. It has people focused on space travel again. Anything that does that in a positive manner is a good thing to me.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  18. Re:But what are the chances for 40-50 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I plan to live forever.

    Or you'll die trying!

  19. I have to admit by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I was not a huge fan of Star Trek: Voyager - but, in my mind, one of the funnier scenes occurred when they ran across an old pickup in space.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  20. Meaningless number by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    Orbits of solar system objects aren't predictable to anywhere near the accuracy required to make that statement meaningfully. Especially not relatively light-weight and complex-shaped things like cars. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    To be more exact, you can run a zillion simulations to come up with a probability, but all of the hit/miss scenarios are meaningless if they're too far in the future.

    1. Re:Meaningless number by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Well, that's exactly what they did: run a zillion simulations (with slightly different initial condidtions) to determine the probability of a collision in the future.

  21. Re:Space junk by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have a way to deal with them. Send offshore oil drillers into space and break up the rock in dramatic fashion with explosives. Saw a documentary about it once.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  22. It would "likely" burn? by Eloking · · Score: 1

    and it would likely burn up as it entered the atmosphere.

    I'm no expert, but since asteroid usually need to be over 25 meter to reach ground (Look at Asteroid Fast Facts NASA on google), could be remove the "likely" out of the sentence?

    --
    Elok
    1. Re:It would "likely" burn? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that super-duper-safe battery compartment has enough shielding to survive atmospheric entry. After all, it would be bad PR for Tesla if a little thing like aerodynamic forces in the hypersonic regime could puncture the battery and start a fire.

    2. Re:It would "likely" burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad PR in a million years?

      OK then.

    3. Re:It would "likely" burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What super-duper-safe battery compartment? It's a v. 0.1 Tesla Roadster - the original. It has a mess of laptop batteries behind the seats.

  23. Re:6% by qzzpjs · · Score: 1

    You seem to forget that the money spent on meals, movies, toys, etc is actually going to the pay of hundreds or even thousands of people who are involved in providing those things for sale. Better that your money keeps them employed than just spending it all on charity. Don't stop supporting charity too though :)

  24. Re:6% by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Instead of a lump of concrete he used an old car. No more dangerous, no CO2 emissions from making the concrete...

    Manufacturing a car is far more environmentally detrimental than making the same mass of concrete.

    Otherwise I agree - his company, his money, his car. I found it clever.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  25. If it ever does, will it look like this? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
  26. If it lands in Britain by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Then the UK will have it's first decent roadster.

    1. Re:If it lands in Britain by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Then the UK will have it's first decent roadster.

      Wait a minute. Jaguar and Aston Martin have made some terrific roadsters. I had a 1960s MGB roadster in the '80s that was great (though useless in Chicago winters). Triumph roadsters were some of the coolest cars ever made. If anything, the UK has had too many decent roadsters.

      http://car-from-uk.com/carphot...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:If it lands in Britain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK has a lot of cool looking roadsters, but often that was all you could do - look. The odds that the cars would run on any given day seemed to be about 50/50.

    3. Re:If it lands in Britain by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The UK has a lot of cool looking roadsters, but often that was all you could do - look. The odds that the cars would run on any given day seemed to be about 50/50.

      Since the odds of it raining on any given day in the UK are about 50/50, you're probably better off taking the Morris sedan anyway.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  27. Mariner 4 by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you are worried about this car, why aren't you worried about Mariner 4? Or any other probe or rocket body that was sent on the same trajectory. They all may impact Earth some day.

    1. Re:Mariner 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are worried about this car, why aren't you worried about Mariner 4? Or any other probe or rocket body that was sent on the same trajectory. They all may impact Earth some day.

      Please explain exactly -- exactly -- why you think that people aren't worried about other man-made objects falling out of orbit. TIA.

    2. Re:Mariner 4 by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I have never heard anyone complain about the possibility of the orbital transfer booster from a Mars probe, even though every one of them has the possibility of hitting Earth at some point in the future. Yet, people are suddenly concerned about this car. If they aren't complaining about NASA, Russia or the ESA launching them, why suddenly SpaceX? It's probably because, for the first time, they realize that orbits aren't one way. Things go round and round until they hit something. We can thank SpaceX for enlightening the general public to that.

    3. Re:Mariner 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain exactly -- exactly -- why you think that people aren't worried about other man-made objects falling out of orbit. TIA.

      Because people are retarded and would rather complain about a single car than any number of other things that might collide with Earth some day.

  28. what noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We put up thousand of satellites and booster that fall back to Earth. Were was the question and research about that? No one even questions every time the DOD pops a spy satellite in orbit. They come down too. The Chinese have their first 'space station' about ready to deorbit and they have no idea where it is coming down.
    A million years? We should be worrying about deorbiting junk now. Some lasers to destabilize orbital junk slowly, a few heating zaps which is also photon pressure, at a time would be a good idea; we did create the mess. But then burying our nuclear waste properly would be a good idea too. We seem lax on passing our problems down to the next generation. That is not standing up like adults in the room. More tanks but not cleaning up after.

    1. Re:what noise by nessman · · Score: 0

      What spy satellites?

  29. Re:Space junk by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    Some pretty good photos and streams hit TV as news but were in fact free Tesla/SpaceX advertising.
    Also, I guarantee he will be the de facto record holder for "Owner of the Highest Mileage Tesla"!

    The one thing that saddens me is the AAA policy requiring you to be with the car if you request service...
    No No No, if you see Ganymede you've gone too far!

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  30. Re:6% by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    The car was already manufactured.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  31. Re:Space junk by youngone · · Score: 2

    ...were in fact free Tesla/SpaceX advertising....

    While you make a good point, my local news had a longish piece last night about Black Panther as if yet another superhero movie is something remarkable.

  32. Re:But what are the chances for 40-50 years? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    I plan to live forever.

    That was my plan too. Once.

    I've learned though that Mother Nature has a different plan. And fighting it is a losing proposition.

    But I hope things work out for you.

  33. Cross the orbit of Venus? by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    TFA says the roadster will cross the orbits of Mars, Earth, and Venus. The last burn was in Earth orbit, so obviously it'll return there. The burn gave it an apohelion well beyond Mars orbit, so obviously it'll cross it (assuming it's in the ecliptic). Every diagram I've seen has the Roadster's orbit roughly tangent to Earth orbit, as would happen if the burn increased its orbital velocity.

    Without major changes to its orbit, the Roadster will stay at Earth orbit or further from the Sun. If it were to make a course correction, it could establish an even more elliptical orbit and cross Venus orbit, but the delta-vee of a Tesla Roadster in a frictionless vacuum is very, very low.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    1. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Oops - said TFA where I meant TFS. Sorry about that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The last burn was in Earth orbit, so obviously it'll return there.

      In my experience its not obvious to most people, even on slashdot, and is evidenced whenever a discussion of planetary capture of moons comes up. The consequences of conservation of energy just doesnt factor into their thinking.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by Megane · · Score: 1

      The aphelion of its orbit has been reported variously as 0.98 and 0.99 AU, so I'm pretty sure it will never cross the orbit of Venus, at least not without the right kind of gravitational kick to really mess up its orbit.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could RTFA... https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04718.pdf

      Gotta think on longer timescales...

    5. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TFA goes into this in some detail. The car is expected to make a close encounter with Earth in 2091 that will sling it into a different orbit. Exactly *what* orbit is very difficult to predict: a difference in the velocity of the car today of 1 cm/s (well within measurement error) would make a massive difference to an encounter 73 years in the future.

      Once it goes through that encounter, over the next few hundreds or hundreds of thousands of years, it will undergo a series of close encounters with various planets (which are much more likely than collisions). Take a look at figure 2 of TFA, which shows the distribution of likely orbits for the car over the next couple of Myr. The initial orbit (marked by the star) just barely touches inside the orbit of Earth; but the evolved orbit (shown by the coloured background) actually has a decent chance of coming within the orbit of *Mercury*, let alone Venus.

      If you look at figure 4, you'll see there's even a very small chance that it'll undergo an encounter with a planet that will sling it into the *Sun*. Earth's still the most likely target, though, because it's on the car's initial orbit; Venus is a possibility, if the orbit evolves in the right way; Mars isn't a plausible possibility because it's so much smaller than Earth or Venus.

    6. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I love the title of that article: "The random walk of cars and their collision probabilities with planets"

    7. Re:Cross the orbit of Venus? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you very much.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  34. cute by elcor · · Score: 0

    how is throwing junk in space worthy of admiration?

    1. Re:cute by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      One man's space junk is another person's test payload for an experimental launch vehicle. That such a feat is considered trivial by some to the point of being 'cute', implies a high level of ignorance and or the possibility of mental retardation, and should be treated accordingly.

    2. Re: cute by peppepz · · Score: 1

      People admire big egos and big money. Throwing away expensive stuff for everyone to admire eternally does check all the boxes. And boy, were the pictures cool.
      They will be more remembered than the actual technological advancement marked by the launch, which is much bigger.

  35. Re: Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free? Yeah launching that rocket sure came cheap...

  36. Re: Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Came from the advertising budget...

  37. Moe's bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It always hits Moe's bar.

  38. Quick!!! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Call the lawyers!!!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  39. Re:6% by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    "you could give every extra penny you have to charity"

    Underage hookers in Haiti!!! Woo-hoo!!!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  40. likely not accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modeling cars in space may have more error than modeling chunks of rock. Shiny side anyone? Were the tires inflated and will there be extra thrust when they leak or get punctured.

  41. Re:Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it will show up in Sky Map on Android at some point. That would be great!

  42. Re:Space junk by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Yup launch was just before releasing record losses for tesla...

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  43. Re:Space junk by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    Black Panther as if yet another superhero movie is something remarkable

    People are making a big deal out of the Black Panther, some are saying it is the first black super hero. They are forgetting Blade with Wesley Snipes was back in 1998, 20 years ago.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  44. Re:6% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he has sworn to never buy a car again.

  45. Re:Space junk by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    But why throw away a perfectly good car ? Or was his Telsa broken and beyond repair ?

  46. Re:Space junk by XXongo · · Score: 1

    But why throw away a perfectly good car ? Or was his Telsa broken and beyond repair ?

    Well, it was ten years old. He probably wanted an excuse to get a new one.

  47. Space is Big [Re:Space junk] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

    So far, we've discovered 15,000 rocks in orbits crossing close to Earth ("Near Earth Objects"), and the best estimate is that we've found about one quarter of the ones larger than 140 meters in diameter.

    Wheelbase of a Tesla roadster is about four meters.

    For every Tesla roadster in Earth-crossing orbit-- one--there are a million rocks that are at least that big.

    There are a lot of asteroids. But, fortunately (quoting Douglas Adams), space is big. Really big.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Space is Big [Re:Space junk] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every Tesla roadster in Earth-crossing orbit-- one--there are a million rocks that are at least that big.

      So, if the Tesla has a 6% chance of hitting Earth in the next million years ... and there are at least a million similar-sized rocks in similar orbits ... Earth has at least a 6% chance of being hit by a Tesla-sized rock each year.

      For comparison, the 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor was about 20 metres in diameter, considerably larger than a Tesla.

    2. Re:Space is Big [Re:Space junk] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but now the aliens who visit our solar system in a million years will know there was intelligent life here once....

  48. Correction: a 0 percent chance by steveha · · Score: 2

    I am 100% confident that the car will never hit the Earth, because I fully expect that within the next couple hundred years it will be retrieved and put on display in a museum somewhere. Maybe the Luna City museum or the Ceres Museum; some Earth museum is also possible.

    Right now, retrieving it is theoretically possible but such a huge and expensive undertaking that it's totally unreasonable. But if we build out our infrastructure, we will have spacecraft flitting between Earth, Mars, and the asteroids and sending a tow truck to grab the Roadster will be no big deal.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Odds are it will even be Elon (SpaceX) that picks it up, and my guess it will be within our/his lifetime, and that the car will be auctioned for millions.

    2. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      I thought he might consider it to be some eternal monument to himself. Being out in space, it could be orbiting there for a very long time, maybe a billion years or so. Somewhat like the Moon landing sites which are historical monuments. Maybe future travellers will be able to visit them, but the whole area will be cordened off and they will have to look down from an observation deck, so everything can be preserved exactly as it was when Apollo astronauts left, footprints and all.

    3. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 100% confident that the car will never hit the Earth, because I fully expect that within the next couple hundred years it will be retrieved and put on display in a museum somewhere. Maybe the Luna City museum or the Ceres Museum; some Earth museum is also possible.

      100%? You have more confidence that we'll still be a space-faring species than I do that we'll still be a species.

      Of course, I hope that you are right.

    4. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      The question will be, then: will it still be drivable? It will probably need new tyres and I don't think the battery will like a multi-decade deep discharge, but apart from that? Will be interesting, for sure.

    5. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Unless it returns and is worshiped by our primitive ancestors...

      OOGA BOOGA! THE TESLA IS ANGRY! ALL HAIL THE TESLA!

      Well played Musk, well played. Did anyone check the glove compartment for any commandments?

      Et obfirmatis sera reserans Model S sit convenient. Etsi autem verum est clavem ad actio- nem, non opus est ea uti.

    6. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > will it still be drivable?

      I seriously doubt it. I'm sure just being in a vacuum will immediately kill the tyres and multiple other components. Micrometorites and radiation will probably damage the snot out of it too. No doubt Tesla would find a way to pretend it lasted just fine though or at least make it driveable again. I can't imagine them missing out on that giant marketing opportunity.

    7. Re:Correction: a 0 percent chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone check the glove compartment for any commandments?

      Didn't you know? They put a paper copy of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy in the glove compartment. They also put a towel in the car and wrote "DON'T PANIC" on the dash screen.

      I don't know what a religion based on that would look like. Maybe just one commandment:
      Thou shalt always know where thy towel is

  49. Re:Space junk by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Why is Musk being celebrated for launching purpose-built space junk? I remember when space junk was considered a problem.

    Why not? Space is rather large and there's plenty of it to accommodate both junk and non junk without them coming within light years of each other.
     

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  50. Re:Space junk by vux984 · · Score: 2

    Blade was more antihero than super hero; along with Hancock, and do we count DeadShot in Suicide Squad?

    Plus I recently watched, Luke Cage on Netflix, but that wasn't a feature film.

    I agree perhaps Black Panther isn't the first, but there aren't really a lot. And there HAVE been a pile of marvel and DC super hero movies made in the last decade - ive lost count -- between Thor, Captain America, Spiderman, Superman and Batman and their sequels its already at least a dozen or more, and that's before even looking at Green Lantern or Antman or other lesser known names, what percentage of them were black vs white? so I don't see why anyone would take issue with a bit of fanfare around this one being about a black hero. It doesn't happen all that often.

  51. Re:Space junk by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    I'm trying to forget Suicide Squad but also totally forgot about Luke Cage.

    I don't have any problem with fanfare, I just didn't want Blade swept under the rug. Blade was a nice breath of fresh air after sparkly vampires and romantic vampires.....

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  52. Re:Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was also a test of the spacesuit that the mannequin driver was in. That's a SpaceX design for the Mars mission.

  53. Re: Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were launching the rocket anyway.

  54. Re:But what are the chances for 40-50 years? by HACG0012 · · Score: 1

    same thinking sportscentre4u

  55. Re:Space junk by cjameshuff · · Score: 1

    Space junk in low and geosynchronous Earth orbit is a problem, this is in solar orbit along with about a billion rocks of comparable mass. And the low cost/mass lift provided by rockets like the Heavy is going to be critical for tug operations to keep crowded Earth orbits clear. The Heavy launch has great implications for space debris, but as something to enable us to mitigate it, not as something that contributes to it.

  56. Re:Space junk by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Think of all the free advertising mileage he got/ is getting out of it.

    It's probably a net savings, and the advertising is a lot less annoying.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  57. Re:6% by cjameshuff · · Score: 1

    For that matter, the second stage itself is more massive than the Roadster. He could have replaced the Roadster with a block of ice that would sublime in orbit, and the debris hazard would be essentially unchanged. It'd just have complicated the launch and left us a bit poorer culturally speaking.

    The name of the next ASDS is the perfect response to those innumerate, ignorant, arrogant jackasses who think there was something wrong with Musk launching his old car as a test payload.

  58. St'man seeks the Creator by az-saguaro · · Score: 1

    We interrupt our regular programming to bring you this important breaking news. We have just learned that an unknown spacecraft is approaching Earth, origins and intentions unknown. Radar and satellite imaging reveal it to be massive in size. No direct contact has been possible so far. However, an emissary from the spaceship has teleported to the Missouri headquarters of Enterprise Rent-A-Car. This non-corporeal entity has occupied the body of an executive secretary who now speaks on behalf of the enigmatic stellar visitor. The entity is quoted as saying, “We seek the Musk unit. You will assist us. I have been programmed by St’man to observe functioning of the carbon-based units infesting the Enterprise. St’man travels here to find the Creator. You may not speak directly to St’man, but if the carbon based units insist on direct dialogue, you will be permitted to speak to copilot Don Panic.”

    1. Re:St'man seeks the Creator by Megane · · Score: 1

      St’man

      "Is this about the GPL?"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  59. Hope Starman paid-up his insurance before lift-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is STARMAN in Good Hands? (LOL!)

  60. Re:Space junk by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

    If he's shooting the car into space, he must not be very happy with it! If even the CEO is dumping it as far away as possible I'll think twice before buying one!

    --

    Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
  61. Heavy Metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opening scene

  62. Re:Space junk by sysrammer · · Score: 2

    Who's the cat that won't cop out
    when there's danger all about?
    (Shaft)
    Right on

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  63. The perfect murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if there is an actual human being sitting in the seat of the car? Elon might be a criminal mastermind. He could have run over a person with his car, and then get all of the world to see him put the evidence of his crime on an orbit around mars.

    And we all applauded him while he did it.

    Genius!

    I would read that book...

    1. Re:The perfect murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone seen Hillary lately?

  64. The car isn't the problem... by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

    it's the asteroid that it knocks out of the asteroid belt into a collision course with Earth that's the problem.

  65. Re:Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure why China got so much flak for for testing ASAT, when the US did the same thing a few years prior.

  66. Re:Space junk by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure why China got so much flak for for testing ASAT, when the US did the same thing a few years prior.

    I did a bit of looking into this.

    Are you talking about the US Navy shootdown in 2008? Ostensibly, the US brought down their malfunctioning satellite in order to prevent it from becoming a hazard due to a large amount of toxic fuel on board. In that case, the satellite was already on its way down, and the destruction just made sure it would completely burn up in the atmosphere. According to reports at the time, all the debris was expected to re-enter the atmosphere within 40 days.

    There was a much earlier test in 1985, but since then, we've had a self-imposed ban on doing so, for precisely the reason we are now seeing with the Chinese test. In China's case, the hundred thousand pieces of debris from their test a decade ago is still orbiting the planet, and will continue to orbit for several more decades at least. It was destroyed at an altitude of 537 miles, so the debris will last much longer than what was caused by the US test, which was destroyed at 350 miles. Orbital decay is not linear, which means that the US test's debris likely had a significantly shorter time-to-decay than the Chinese test.

    So, no, the US record isn't exactly spotless here, but hopefully everyone's learned their lesson about this sort of thing.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  67. Re:Space junk by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why China got so much flak

    Also, I see what you did there...

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  68. Re: Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should Musk be allowed to use his publically-funded private space program to promote his publically-funded private auto business though?

  69. Re:Space junk by Z80a · · Score: 1

    It will certainly hold the record for the longest drift.

  70. Could make for a good scifi by Mouldy · · Score: 1

    Current civilisation crumbles and by the time the roadster crashes down to earth, civilisation has rebuilt itself to the point of 1940s technology.

    The car comes crashing down in a place coincidentally named Roswell, and top scientists harvest this strange extraterrestrial technology for the wonders of ICs, microcontrollers & Li-ion batteries.

    Obviously the government don't want to cause panic that some alien craft crashed from space, so they subtly release technology based on this 'Tesla' civilisation's tech and take credit of these wonderful inventions themselves.

    ...maybe this has happened before...

  71. Re:But what are the chances for 40-50 years? by pezpunk · · Score: 1

    zero

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  72. Re:Space junk by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "I wonder if it'll be useful as a practice target to identify for collision warning systems."

    They should have added a solar panel on the hood, so that it can turn on the lights from time to time the next million years.

  73. Obligatory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/voy_the37s012.jpg

  74. Radiation will tear it apart by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    long before it even gets anywhere remotely close to Mars, let alone coming back to Earth.

  75. It could be worshipped in the distant future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if you would, the situation between Iran and Israel escalates to an unbelievable horror. The US is forced to intervene, but not without Russia intervening on behalf of Iran. Imagine a quick escalation between tactical nukes and country-wrecking megaton class weapons. The fallout and hellscape firestorms consumes nearly all of man and the information it has collected over the past thousands of years. Books, gone. Digital data, gone. Google, Facebook, and Amazon's datacenters, seen as a high value target by Russia, are directly targeted. Nothing remains. Most servers are taken offline permanently due to the effects of the thousands of EMPs. Those not destroyed by EMP have no power. Most of those with the knowledge and skill to rebuild the infrastructure are dead from either the blast, effects of fallout, or starvation. FEMA is overwhelmed, unable to distribute food to the targeted metro areas.

    Hundreds or thousands of years pass, and humanity is rebuilding itself. Astrology is rediscovered and a few years later, a red car is seen passing over Earth with no explanation. The car comes crashing to Earth and the only thing that remains is a smoldering lithium battery, the frame, and a tiny red Tesla inside what used to be the glovebox.

    I don't know where I was going with this... but welcome to my imagination.

  76. Re:Space junk by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    > But why throw away a perfectly good car ?

    Well, when you have a dead prostitute in the trunk, and a big rocket in need of a payload. What would you do?

  77. Re:6% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The environmental cost aspect of it depends on the question of whether Musk was going to keep driving that car or if he already had plans to replace it before this stunt.

    If a new car was built to replace this one for his personal use that would not have been built had Musk not launched his car vaguely toward Mars, then the construction cost of that car minus the relative efficiency benefits of the new design can be directly attributed to this launch.

    My point being, as my point seems to always be when talking to people who think they know anything, reality is complicated.

  78. crash into Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we mount a parachute in it? It would be so nice to put my hands in it.

  79. So you're telling me there's a chance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a la Dumb and Dumber

  80. Re:Space junk by multi+io · · Score: 1

    Why is Musk being celebrated for launching purpose-built space junk? I remember when space junk was considered a problem.

    Should we ever manage to create a space junk problem in heliocentric orbits, it would be an amazing achievement.

  81. Even if it was a plublicity stunt... by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    ...there's still part of me wishing they would have launched something semi-useful. Something like having a competition for building an ultra cheap satellite. I think it would be pretty inspiring to be part of a college team that built a satellite, then it could be tracked and used for lessons down the road. Maybe they would find unexpected readings. Or they could have launched something with an experimental energy source / materials, something for science, etc.

  82. Re:Space junk by saider · · Score: 1

    He is pre-positioning it in the space garage, and will pick it up on the way to Mars. This way he will have something to drive.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  83. Re:Space junk by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    Ostensibly, the US brought down their malfunctioning satellite in order to prevent it from becoming a hazard due to a large amount of toxic fuel on board.

    Yes, ostensibly is the word. The satellite tank, a very thin shell (like all space fuel tanks) contained 500 kg of hydrazine, could not have survived re-entry intact -- such a thing has never happened before with the many deorbiting launchers and satellites over the years. You cannot get a hydrazine tank from orbit to Earth's surface unprotected with its contents still on board. Indeed even given that the pipe connections to the tank would be broken, the hydrazine would quickly have outgassed even from an intact tank.

    And the extraordinary expense on Operation Burned Frost relative to even the theoretical hazard of of 500 kg of hydrazine landing somewhere randomly on the Earth's surface was far out of proportion to how similar toxic hazards are normally handled.

    There were two far more plausible reasons: it was an American military reconnaissance satellite and they wanted to make sure the classified technologies on it were destroyed, and they wanted to practice an orbital shoot down. Probably both of these were motivations, the "hydrazine threat" cover story was ludicrous.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  84. OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now i'm waiting for Gravity 2 and we will probably see a tesla crash into a space station.....

  85. Re:Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sparkly romantic vampires came out 10 years AFTER Blade. Even Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV Series) - which features many more dangerous and evil vampires than romantic ones - only started one year before Blade.

  86. Tosa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the far future, we'll be visited by "Tosa", and it will want to speak to its creator. And we'll need a bald chick to communicate.

  87. Museum piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iâ(TM)d bet it will be sitting in some museum within a hundred years.

  88. Re:Space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, but no-one understands him!

    But his woman of course

  89. I imagine... by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    In 1000 years, when Elon Musk and this launch are tiny footnotes in obscure history books, there will be some inhabitants of the Asteroid Belt scratching their heads and going "WHAT THE FUCK?!" when they find that car.

  90. Re:6% by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    So was the concrete.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  91. Re:6% by hawkfish · · Score: 1

    The car was already manufactured.

    Sure, but I bet he's going to replace it and the one is space won't end up on the secondary market.

    Not that I think it was a bad idea, but this is a very deep rathole...

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates