Slashdot Mirror


The Slow Demise of Barnes & Noble (techcrunch.com)

John Biggs via TechCrunch reports of the slow demise of Barnes & Noble, which he has been chronicling for several years now. There have been many signs of trouble for the bookseller chain over the years, but none have been more apparent than the recent layoffs made earlier this week. From the report: On Monday the company laid off 1,800 people. This offered a cost savings of $40 million. [...] In fact, what B&N did was fire all full time employees at 781 stores. Further, the company laid off many shipping receivers around the holidays, resulting in bare shelves and a customer escape to Amazon. In December 2017, usually B&N's key month, sales dropped 6 percent to $953 million. Online sales fell 4.5 percent. It is important to note that when other big box retailers, namely Circuit City, went the route of firing all highly paid employees and bringing in minimum wage cashiers, stockers, and salespeople it signaled the beginning of the end.

121 comments

  1. No Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I mean, who honestly thought putting the internet on dead trees would be something people would be interested in?

    1. Re:No Wonder by mikael · · Score: 2

      They actually did that in the past. Some companies used to publish telephone directories of Email addresses, because they really thought that was going to be the future.

      Book stores were really popular before Amazon and online internet. You could walk into a high street bookstore in a large city and it would be a paradise of advanced knowledge. Every subject in the world would be there to read; science, fiction, reference, technical, music, arts, geography.

      After Amazon, those bookstores have been relegated to selling fiction and crime categories if they haven't been closed down altogether.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re: No Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&N was always shit.
      They came into a town, undercut the small shops, then cut selection and raised prices.
      They had breadth, but not depth. And their stocking choices were idiotic. I went in to a B&N during their heydey to pick up King's Dark Tower series as a gift. They didn't have #2 in stock... they had it on special order only.

    3. Re:No Wonder by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I still go to Barnes and Noble, and they do have all those types of books. Not as many, and store space is being used up by overpriced videos, but it still feels like a bookstore.

    4. Re:No Wonder by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Book stores were really popular before Amazon and online internet."

      Just like Cobblers, Whip-makers and Coopers.

    5. Re: No Wonder by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "B&N was always shit.
      They came into a town, undercut the small shops, then cut selection and raised prices."

      And how they howled and complained and sued when Amazon did the same thing to them.

    6. Re: No Wonder by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      B&N was always shit.

      As a non-American who never visited the US, I wholeheartedly agree.

      Back in the early 2000's I was already a heavy buyer from early ebook sellers such as eReader and Fictionwise (which at some point purchased the former and merged with it). It was fantastic to be able to buy books without paying freight and waiting 3 months for them to arrive, even if all I could read them on was my desktop computer. Then came B&N, purchased Fictionwise, and eventually shut the site down, absorbing the ebook business into its own site.

      That wouldn't have been a problem weren't for a single, small issue: US users were allowed to transfer their ebook libraries from their Fictionwise accounts to their B&N accounts. International customers were given the middle finger and told "download them before this date as they'll be gone forever afterwards".

      I still have all of my 345 Fictionwise and eReader ebooks in my Calibre library, all properly backed up, with any DRMed titles cracked ages ago, and converted to both ePub and Mobi formats. But, my, was I pissed!

      If I ever visit the US, and B&N is still around, I'll make sure to not buy from them.

      PS: Something similar happened to eMusic. Worldwide reach for years, then suddenly US-only, with non-US customers losing access to their music libraries. So, yeah. They all deserve what they're getting.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    7. Re:No Wonder by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Just like Cobblers, Whip-makers and Coopers.

      I still like a good cobbler, especially with some whip on top. Pie is better, though.

      And as for coopers, many of the finest things in life are barrel-aged.

  2. Just Like Circuit City by UdoKeir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The expensive management that steered the ship into the rocks don't get cut: https://www1.salary.com/barnes...

    1. Re:Just Like Circuit City by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The expensive management that steered the ship into the rocks don't get cut:

      Different management would have made no difference. Retail bookselling was doomed. Nothing could have saved it.

    2. Re:Just Like Circuit City by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe, maybe not, but those extravagant salaries certainly accelerated the decline. That $40 million in savings from firing 1800 people could have been had by firing a single CEO, and probably triple that could have been had removing the entire management team and replacing them with someone that knew the business and had a vision for the future.

      B&N was doomed by an inability by lack of vision, the created the first Android based Ebook reader and they gave up the market through negligence. The management during this period had no vision for the future and was obsessed with the next quarter, not the technological revolution that was going to totally change their industry. B&N never adapted, there are plenty of independent book sellers still in business and actually thriving because they cater to the people that actually read books. B&N's management took the path of selling board games and coffee rather than trying to attract people that actually read books. Rather than focus the business they tried to generalize and drove the real readers to the independent book sellers.

      They would have done better to fire all the management and hire one of those independent book sellers to run the chain.

    3. Re:Just Like Circuit City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it is very hard to attract talent to an obviously sinking ship. I mean they are basically just managing the decline.

      I seriously doubt the people running a mom & pop bookstore have the skills required to run a conglomerate of like 700 stores, all of which are way bigger than the mom & pop store.

      You are really just talking out of your ass about basically everything yous aid here. You are talking about scaling up small stores with small niche markets. That wouldn't work for very obvious reasons.

    4. Re:Just Like Circuit City by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      someone that knew the business and had a vision for the future.

      Nobody that "knows the business" has a vision for the future of book retailing because there is no future.

      there are plenty of independent book sellers still in business and actually thriving

      In your dreams. Every independent bookseller in my city went under a decade ago. Then Borders folded. B&N is the last to close.

      B&N's management took the path of selling board games and coffee

      That was a smart move, and helped them outlast their competitors, but it wasn't enough.

    5. Re:Just Like Circuit City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Incorrect. Retail bookselling is only doomed in stupid countries. They're stupid for 2 reasons: first, they don't love books and second, they stood by and did nothing as Amazon walked up with a smile and ruined their book industry.

      If you look at Japan, their book industry is a monster. The Japanese LOVE to read, it's a national passion. As a result, when Amazon came to Japan and went to their publishers to try and give them the same deal that all western publishers had no choice but to accept, the Japanese laughed at them. Ebooks are a novelty in Japan and the entire country still prefers physical magazines, physical books (as well as physical CD's and movies....Japan is the only place left on earth where artists still sell over a million physical copies of releases).

      I live in Sydney, AU. All the Aussie bookstores went out of business....know who is doing better than ever? KInokuniya....a Japanese book chain, whose shop in Sydney continues to thrive, even as our own bookstores are now just memories. Inside Japan, the biggest success story in retail in the past decade or so is Book-Off, a national chain of used bookstores. If you go to Tokyo, you can see their passion in action, there are 2 suburbs (Kanda & Jinbocho) dedicated ENTIRELY to books (Kanda is where all the publishers are HQ'd and Jinbocho is the biggest collection of used bookstores in the world).

      Places that love books, still have books. Places full of stupid people have Amazon.

    6. Re:Just Like Circuit City by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. Not everyone is a slave to Amazon, every time I go to a bookstore there are lots of real people walking around inside it.

    7. Re:Just Like Circuit City by lgw · · Score: 1

      So, you figure they could have attracted a higher grade of management who actually had the vision needed to saving the company ... by paying them less?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Just Like Circuit City by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Books themselves are in decline, at least in the English speaking countries I'm familiar with. They all seem to have clickbait titles and are thin on detail.

      For me the lack of good magazines to serve as a gateway into technical books is what really stopped me buying glued together bits of dead tree.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re: Just Like Circuit City by fortfive · · Score: 1

      Rip the nook hd. Had an excellent interface far superior in terms of look and feel even to iOS.

      The simple touch is the superior eink reader, too, with itâ(TM)s physical buttons. If b&j canâ(TM)t handle it, I hope somebody good buys the ip. Maybe Apple will buy b&n.

    10. Re:Just Like Circuit City by ranton · · Score: 1

      My guess is the author of this post doesn't even manage a dozen employees, let alone 26,000. One sure fire way to identify someone who has successfully moved up the ranks of responsibility at a large enterprise is they understand how vastly more difficult each move up the corporate ladder is. The thought that some manager of an independent book seller with perhaps a few dozen employees could handle a 26,000 person enterprise is laughable for anyone who has the slightest clue what they are talking about.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    11. Re:Just Like Circuit City by mikael · · Score: 1

      The people who run a mom & pop bookstore are usually those who worked for a large chain, then saw what the market was really looking for but were tied down by corporate bean counting, so left and started up their own business.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re:Just Like Circuit City by swillden · · Score: 1

      That $40 million in savings from firing 1800 people could have been had by firing a single CEO

      The B&N CEO made $5M in 2017, most of that in (rapidly declining) stock. https://www1.salary.com/Max-J-...

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re: Just Like Circuit City by nnull · · Score: 1

      This is typical for any business, at least in the US.

      Management will always try to keep their salaries high instead of sacrificing to keep talent on hand and try to find, fix, or create something new to allieviate the problem. I rarely find companies try to steer a different path because change requires actual work, teamwork, and people that actually care about the company, instead of just themselves and circle of friends working in said company.

      Too many places I've seen cut off key employees instead of themselves, which ends up being a disaster as they struggle to get the same results with less.

    14. Re:Just Like Circuit City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, yes.
      Why do you need to attract outsider talent, when it was *already there* in the company?

      Promote from within? Nope, we need a complete stranger to take control.

    15. Re:Just Like Circuit City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These corporate suits you speak of don't "move up the ranks".
      They ride a golden helicopter to the top.
      They show up once in a while at a given store to pick it apart, then spend most of their time picking their nose having delegated work to others.

    16. Re:Just Like Circuit City by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      books-a-million is still around and half-price books does a brisk business in used and new books.

    17. Re: Just Like Circuit City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If bookstores have no future, then why is Amazon opening physical bookstores?
      https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/102071054

    18. Re: Just Like Circuit City by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      I saw a CNBC actual physical store in the Charlotte NC airport selling magazines and stuff.
      Media isn't dead and once you've filled your entire marketing niche, you need to expand elsewhere or not expand at all.

  3. B&N went from best-middle of the road by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hate amazon. It's prevalence makes searching for other sellers harder. That said, B&N is no better.

    Barnes and Nobles used to be the best book store. That is why it outlasted all the other big chains.

    Now, when I go to a B&N, they give the same crappy service that the old chains do. They used to have a section for the new science fiction/fantasy books, not anymore. The new ones are shelved alphabetically. Same for Mysteries.

    As for the Nook, they do stupid things like storing samples as if they were books. When you read a sample, no link to buy the book (let alone opening the new book to the end of the sample and deleting the sample).

    Their service has gone down hill. They decided to try and out-cheap Amazon. They failed.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate extra apostrophes. Their prevalence makes reading comments harder.

      it's means it is.

      Is it really so difficult to understand?

    2. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      weird, cause amazon is full of third party sellers to the point it's impossible to buy something from amazon itself. they are the best thing to happen to small business in decades

    3. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh I bought some books on Amazon in the 90s after they opened and never looked back. No reason to walk into a store unless it's quicker or cheaper. B&N was doomed no matter what.

      Walmart will stick around because it's more convenient for many than ordering online. B&N was too specialized.

    4. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note the word "third party seller". I'm the first party, Amazon is the SECOND party.

      Amazon inserted itself as a middleman into all those transactions. They are not the best thing to happen to small business - internet sales are the best thing.

      Amazon made it slightly easier for the seller by taking a slice of their profit and also making it MUCH harder for anyone that doesn't want to give Amazon that slice of the profit.

      Worse, it makes deep searches much harder. Do a search for anything that is for sale and Amazon pushes itself to the top of the list. If you are not trying to buy, it's annoying and makes searching for what you really want much harder. If you are trying to buy it is very hard to use any other store.

      The word for that is Monopoly and it should be considered a curse word.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their service has gone down hill. They decided to try and out-cheap Amazon. They failed.

      No, it's a failure of Capitalism. The best possible "service" under Capitalism (beyond you just giving them money), is a service that is wholly owned by one person and has instant delivery of anything. (Basically a ration based Star Trek style replicator.) That leaves no room for "employees" or "benefits". If such a thing were possible, every single capitalist system would collapse the second they could set the things up. The system replaced with those who owned the replicators and those starving to death. Long story short, you can't expect a system that promotes greed to provide charity except when truly necessary.

      A brick and mortar store cannot compete with a web presence only store. The web store simply lacks many of the brick and mortar store's required expenses. The real question is whether or not the public wants to see all brick and mortar stores go the way of the dodo, or will they be willing to pay to keep the brick and mortar around? In some places I'd assume that answer is "Yes, will pay more.", but in places like the US I'd bet money that the answer would be "Nope, not on your life. See ya brick and mortar."

      What's really going to be fun is what happens to those service economies once these places do go away. Less stores means less large shipments, which leads to less need for drivers, and trucks, and creature comforts, and road maintenance, etc.....

    6. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Teckla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      weird, cause amazon is full of third party sellers to the point it's impossible to buy something from amazon itself. they are the best thing to happen to small business in decades

      Ugh, I avoid almost all of Amazon's third party sellers like the plague, because there are so damn many shady companies, many of them selling counterfeits, used items as new, broken items, etc. -- and Amazon does not seem particularly interested in policing the problem...

    7. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Teckla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I started going to B&N less and less because it upset me that they wouldn't give me the good price unless I signed up for their damn club. I hate that shit.

    8. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      If they didn't charge $50/year to sign up for their club, I would. I simply don't buy enough books to be worth it, and books are significantly cheaper at Costco and on Amazon.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    9. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Walmart is cheap, and I can order online and pick up the next day in Oregon, avoiding the Washington sales taxes I would have to pay if it was delivered. But trying to get someone to help you at Walmart is a lost cause!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by rfengr · · Score: 1

      It is, isn’t it? Not that it’s important.

    11. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      What "required expenses" do brick and mortar stores have that Amazon doesn't have? Amazon has employees, pays property taxes, pays utilities, pays insurance on their properties, etc.

    12. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An engineer defending poor spelling. Who'd have thought it?

    13. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Ahem, that’s thunk it.

    14. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Informative

      What "required expenses" do brick and mortar stores have that Amazon doesn't have?

      It costs money to lease space in malls, and money to keep it open to the public. It is much cheaper to lease or build warehouse space that is open only to employees.

    15. Re: B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, it's a failure of Capitalism"
      No it's a failure of the Internet, or more precisely, how people behave on the Internet. The promise of the Internet back in 2000 was that every small business could sell worldwide. But people didn't like registering/using a 100 different sites so gravitated to just one; Amazon. Now that Amazon fills their need they don't even look for alternatives. In the days of the shopping mall, people could decide on a whim to try a new store just because they were walking by it. That never happens on the Internet.

    16. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      avoiding the Washington sales taxes I would have to pay if it was delivered.

      You can do the same with Amazon by having your order delivered to a locker in Oregon.

      But trying to get someone to help you at Walmart is a lost cause!

      If you are trying to locate an item, they are helpful. If you are looking for a product recommendation then a store employee is the wrong person to ask.

    17. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by mikael · · Score: 1

      That's due to the pricing regulations that many cities impose. Some countries have warehouse style stores located downtown. They have no problem selling stock. It's the little high-street shops that have the problems. They're not large enough to have a wide variety of stock so they don't sell the latest high-end items for the hardcore enthusiast, but mainly low end stock that won't last.

      That's everything from PC's to home decorations and furniture.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    18. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      No it isn't. That's due to the market. Malls are built because they can charge rent. Developers build downtown stores because they can charge rent- high rent. You don't see warehouses downtown because the owners can make more money tearing them down and building other things. There is absolutely 0 to do with regulations here. Its all supply and demand of the real estate market. And it is a FUCKING HUGE cost of running brick and mortar stores.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    19. Re: B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone punch this nerd in the face before I eat my hand.

    20. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Costco also charges you an annual membership fee... and Amazon does their damnedest to do the same thing.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    21. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Less large shipments (and more personal journeys) would be replaced with more small shipments, people would still buy the goods and need to get them home.

      Brick and mortar stores provide the benefit of letting customers view the product before buying it, but often they will view in a store and then order it online for a lower price.

      There are also various actions which significantly hurt these stores, like lack or cost of parking or poor availability of transport. Going to a store could result in you wasting several hours of your time plus transport costs, only to find the store doesn't have stock of the item you wanted.

      A lot of places have also become greedy with parking, either charging extortionate fees for parking or making it difficult in order to generate more revenue from parking fines.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Economies of scale, and convenience...
      You can have one large warehouse that serves deliveries to a wide area, but the area that a store can serve is limited by the distance people are willing to travel. So you end up with multiple smaller stores each with less stock.

      You can put the warehouse in a cheaper location, a store has to be where potential customers can reach it easily.

      A warehouse only needs sufficient parking for staff and waiting delivery trucks, a store needs parking for customers too.

      For a store the stock has to be displayed for customers, for a warehouse that's not the case so it can be stored more efficiently.

      A store has a greater risk of theft, as the public is able to enter the store and handle the goods. There is also a greater risk of goods being damaged in this way. While theft from a warehouse is not unheard of, a distribution warehouse is a private building only accessible to staff - thefts are less common, and the perpetrators are easier to catch.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Both of those sell a *LOT* more than just books... You have to weigh up the cost of the membership fee against the total value of items you're going to buy there over the course of a year.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    24. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      All those small sellers: I will never buy directly from them because I have no idea how secure their e-commerce platform is.

      I will buy via an intermediary, such as Amazon, because I trust Amazon with my credit card details.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    25. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You are a moron if you trust Amazon.

      1. You're credit card doesn't matter. You have no liability when your CC gets stolen.
      2. Amazon sells EVERYTHING ELSE about you. Where you surf, when you jerk off, what kind of toilet paper you buy, what you read, what you watch, when you sleep, what you eat, etc.

      Amazon fucking OWNS you. You traded your dignity for a bit of convenience. You're a fucking moron.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    26. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      weird, cause amazon is full of third party sellers to the point it's impossible to buy something from amazon itself. they are the best thing to happen to small business in decades

      It's not impossible, or even difficult. It's really easy. If you can't manage a simple ecommerce transaction with competence I wonder if you can even tie your own shoelaces without fucking it up at least twice. Per foot.

    27. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      If you are an Amazon third party seller they charge outrageous fees that eats into your margin. Its not so great .

    28. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and I am a member of both but not for B&N. You wanna know why? Well I am going to tell you anyway just to make sure you understand the differences:

      Amazon gives me music and television services as well as the free shipping.
      Costco saves me BOATLOADS of money. Hell with my family I probably save 50 a year in TP and paper towels alone. Also some of the fringe benefits are nice, I've gotten really good deals on trips and what not through Costco travel. I just wish they weren't so freaking busy. Its amazing how fucking blue hairs can manage to take up a complete aisle in Costco.

    29. Re: B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is whoda.

    30. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      You, and other critics, act like Amazon is some single entity. Amazon is not. Instead, Amazon is more like a mall, a place where tens of thousands of resellers gather to serve hundreds of millions of customers. Amazon is simply the interface and provides services like sales tax computing, shipping, stocking, etc. When I buy on Amazon I'm typically buying from some business that is selling through Amazon. Even individuals like you and I can participate.

      Hating Amazon is like hating eBay, the city down the road that has lots of stores, a mall, etc.

      I like Amazon because it gives me easy access to a huge number of products. I live out in a very rural area. Without Amazon and other online systems I would not have access to these products that I need for my business and home.

      Don't waste good hate.

    31. Re: B&N went from best-middle of the road by nnull · · Score: 1

      Amazon made it possible to ship items from Europe to the US now with their foreign sites. I found it a lot easier and I can actually get stuff I want compared to calling the shop at midnight my time and asking if they will ship, with the obvious big fat no, because blah blah blah, VAT, blah blah, blah, paperwork, blah, blah, blah.

    32. Re:B&N went from best-middle of the road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme guess...you're one of those million third-party Amazon sellers that deceives customers by substituting shitty knockoffs instead of what's in the description.

      Yes indeed, that explains your butthurt perfectly.

  4. Communists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who deny the creative destruction feature of capitalism rail against Adam Smith as if they had read him. They are liars and they know it.

  5. First sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it should have called its tablet the Nookie, with pr0n doors.

    1. Re:First sign by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I think any business model based on people PAYING for porn is doomed, but what do I know?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  6. Sad by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    I thought they had saved themselves with the Nook (unlike Borders). But their business model is fundamentally flawed; you can't compete with Amazon prices while paying high-end department store lease costs! In December, it looked like they were trying to be a toy store to bring margins up, but that didn't work for them either (and Toy-R-Us is going out of business too.) Can anybody compete with Amazon?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Sad by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm a printer, and we can.

      We have a customer that sells using Amazon fulfillment.

      It's cheaper to use us and have us ship packages to Amazon warehouses than to use Amazon.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Sad by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

      When I was younger I was very angry with Borders for not developing an e-reader. I waited a good long while before buying a kindle and abandoning Borders as my place for book get. In retrospect, just being a huge bookseller probably didn't mean they had the clout to develop that kind of infrastructure.

      Then again, they did for a time feature Sony's struggling e-reader. Those two could probably have been able to meaningfully compete with the Kindle. Might not have mattered anyway; I stopped going there when they scrapped Cafe Valos for Seattle's best and stopped carrying Vanilla Mystic Chai.

    3. Re:Sad by Obfuscant · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I stopped going there when they scrapped Cafe Valos for Seattle's best and stopped carrying Vanilla Mystic Chai.

      You abandoned a bookstore because their coffee shop wasn't to your liking? Wasn't much of a bookstore then, was it? I mean, you should be going to a bookstore to buy books, not to sit around treating it like a library reading room while drinking coffee. You were turning all those "new" books into "used" books without the dealer being honest enough to sell them as such.

    4. Re:Sad by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you mean by books. Every weekend it had been my habit to drive to Borders, read some role-playing manuals, and then buy a novel. I stopped, well, partly it was the coffee shop, and partly it was because 4th edition of D&D came out. World of Dungeoncraft manuals are boring and not enjoyable to read through. They also just plain trimmed down the RPG section. Before then they had a lot of semi-obscure stuff like A|State.

      Did I particularly convert those manuals to 'used' status? Not to my knowledge; they're kind of designed for rougher treatment than a fat guy with clean hands reading them page by page. I think I actually bought a copy of the Kult manual, although I might have imagined doing so. Huh, I should dig that out if I did; it's worth like eighty bucks now.

    5. Re:Sad by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you mean by books.

      What depends on that? You quoted nothing, so there is no context for that statement.

      Every weekend it had been my habit to drive to Borders, read some role-playing manuals, and then buy a novel.

      Those would be "books", as sold in a bookstore. Why did you think that you should be able to treat the bookstore like a library, other than their stupid decision to put a coffee shop and chairs in their bookstore?

      Did I particularly convert those manuals to 'used' status? Not to my knowledge;

      Yes, by using them you made them "used". They certainly weren't new anymore. This is worse with magazines, but books have the same issues. I've picked up "new" books (and magazines) that showed more wear and tear than I would ever give them, and wondered why anyone would buy them for full price. That is just one more example of a cost that B&N has that Amazon does not. You don't get to touch the products without paying.

      Maybe they thought by pretending to be a library they'd attract more people who would buy books, but they've lost sales to me because I won't pay full price for a used book or magazine.

    6. Re:Sad by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Toys R Us is going through bankruptcy, but they have a huge debt load from a leveraged buyout and may be able to survive with that discharged.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    7. Re:Sad by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

      Fisking is lame.

    8. Re:Sad by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Quoting what you are specifically replying to is good practice. What's lame is expecting bookstores to provide free reading of their wares and not paying them for the privilege, as is dismissing opposing ideas with sound-byte inanities.

    9. Re:Sad by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 0

      Ah, now I 'expected' it of them. I think your lack of coherence emerges when you can't do line by line rebuttals to make yourself look witty. Fisking is lame.

    10. Re:Sad by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Ah, now I 'expected' it of them.

      Quoting words that weren't used is lame, as is trying to debate the meaning of the word "books". Do you next try asking what the meaning of "is" is?

      Why did you think you should be able to use a bookstore as a library? They're spending a lot of money so you can sit and read their books for free, and now we wonder why they're failing? Libraries get support from tax dollars; bookstores need to show a profit to remain open. You don't go to a bookstore because the coffee isn't the right brand? Do you have a response that isn't lame, or just more irrelevant ad hominem?

    11. Re: Sad by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Borders used the Kobo.

      Their real issue was that they never embraced online. In fact,their website was originally done through Target.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re: Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A point to note, Toys R Us was driven into the ground with a leveraged acquisition by KKR.

  7. 50% markup over Amazon by rfengr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    B&N sells the books for list price, which is typically 50% over Amazon. That’s too damn much, physical store or not.

    1. Re:50% markup over Amazon by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      B&N sells the books for list price, which is typically 50% over Amazon. Thatâ(TM)s too damn much, physical store or not.

      They are, however, about the only reliable periodical dealer left. You can still go in and pay cash for magazines you don't necessarily want connected to you.

    2. Re:50% markup over Amazon by CG_Man · · Score: 1

      Every time I thought of grabbing a book at B&N in the past few years, the price premium over Amazon -- and their own online store! -- prompted me to order online, usually from Amazon where Prime gets me a quick, free delivery. Too bad. I do enjoy sitting in their cafe from time to time reading or working on my laptop.

    3. Re:50% markup over Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the one who still buys copies of 2600 at B&N.

    4. Re:50% markup over Amazon by rfengr · · Score: 1

      They don’t have those top shelf magazines. Have to go to truck stops for those.

    5. Re:50% markup over Amazon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can still go in and pay cash for magazines you don't necessarily want connected to you.

      Yeah, I don't want anyone to know I still read dead trees either. What year is it?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:50% markup over Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of books are over list price. Peel back their stickers and reveal they were charging an extra 20%. They won't even price match their own website.

    7. Re:50% markup over Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&N's *own website* also significantly undercuts B&N's retail operation, usually fairly close to Amazon prices. You can order online to pick up in store but you'll still be charged the inflated retail price.

  8. Sad-Brick and stones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet you don't see the irony as well as the flaw in blaming brick and mortar when you see Amazon jumping into the same.

  9. Dumb management by DogDude · · Score: 1

    As somebody in successful, growing retail, I'm shocked at how management at so many big retailers make such bad decisions. Almost universally, they react to increased competition by cutting costs. They make a short term gain at the expense of the company. Almost every major, national retailer has, or is in the process of doing this. We went the other way, and we're competing just fine.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Dumb management by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

      There's a certain amount of cash coming in. When that's reduced, the decision makers don't want to take a pay cut. So they cut costs. It just goes to show a) how good they are at managing and b) where their priorities lie (not with the long-term health of the organization).

  10. I hope they stay in business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is something pleasing about being able to walk into a Barnes and Noble and look through physical books. Pick them up, leaf through them and make a purchase decision. Back when it was a war between Borders and B&N, B&N won handily with its quieter, classier atmosphere. HOWEVER - their pricing model is all kinds of messed up. They will not honor their internet price at their stores for local pickup. In this day and age, that is ass-backwards. To maintain relevance, they absolutely need to maintain price competitiveness. If they lose the retail locations and become and online-only operation, they as a company are dead. Amazon will eat them alive.

  11. The Problem with Brick and Mortar Bookstores by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's so many books that they can only possibly stock a tiny percentage of them in the store. Unless I'm going to by some just out best-seller, it's unlikely the book I want is going to be there.

    Sure I could order it, but then why not just order from Amazon? It takes the same amount of time to arrive at that point and I saved myself two trips to the mall.

    If brick and mortar book stars were going to survive, the needed to switch over to some sort of print on demand system like the Espresso Book Machine that could spit out any book a customer might want in an hour.

  12. High Prices Bring Doom by JimSadler · · Score: 0

    Providing good books at very low prices makes for a boom. Providing good books for high prices ensures failure. This happens all across all elements of the economy. Inflation is one issue and greed is a real kicker. For example anyone that can make a really good mid size motorcycle will earn billions if the machine is $1500 new out the door. Build a similar machine at $18,000 and you will struggle to stay alive. Many items would be more of a profit if it were simply much less expensive.

    1. Re: High Prices Bring Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  13. Shame, B&N is by far the best B&M bookstor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our local B&N has had really good customer service for years. It's a shame we wont see the same familiar faces anymore. The store has always been well kept with good and relevant displays. The kid programs and activities are always on point too.

    So sad.

  14. Thankfully, we still... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    ...have libraries. Along with computers and scanners they will be able to preserve humankind's legacy.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  15. Wonder why by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    My son was looking for a new book, went in and got him Hitchhikers Guide. Brought it to the checkout, $16???? for a 150 page book?

    1. Re:Wonder why by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      $16???? for a 150 page book?

      The cover price for the original 1979 edition of HHG was $6.95. That's well over $20 in today's dollars.

    2. Re:Wonder why by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      The cover price for the original 1979 edition of HHG was $6.95. That's well over $20 in today's dollars.

      That sounds high. My memory of the baseline price of most novels from the late 80's to mid-90's is $5. In fact, I can remember an odd moment sometime around 1990 when I was looking at the original Dragonlance trilogy in a bookstore, and I found side-by-side on the shelves versions of the book marked $2.95, $3.95, and $4.95.

  16. Too many freeloader dicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who go to the store, browse the stacks and find the book they want, then order it from Amazon.

    These people are the reason B&N will go out of business. And when that happens, you bet that Jeff Bezos will immediately cancel most of the discounts on books, just like he did for music CDs after Tower Records and HMV shut down. Amazon is great competitor, but they are not anybody's friend.

    1. Re:Too many freeloader dicks by rfengr · · Score: 1

      CDs are cheaper now than the early 90’s, even including inflation.

  17. Just Like vinyl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to say "vinyl is dead" while you have your crystal ball out.

    1. Re: Just Like vinyl. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is essentially dead.

  18. Good by mattmarlowe · · Score: 1

    Much like Sears, B&N has been a walking zombie for way too long.

    - Prices too high
    - Selection/choice too minimal
    - Customer communication/experience continually degraded
    - Not really that much faster than ordering books same-day/overnight, don't have to find book in store or wait in line
    - Switch to online books was too little, too late

    Could B&N have saved itself? Sure. But, they kept pigeon holing themselves as a retailer and not a solution provider. The only real reason to keep going to a physical bookstore is the experience. B&N needed to do more to partner with starbucks, libraries, post offices, etc to integrate themselves into town centers rather than stand-alone mall shops. They needed to be able to print out books onsite ondemand. They needed to have more staff with real knowledge about the books they sell. And, they needed to do more to make their customers feel special and stay in regular contact.

    B&N thought they could survive by just being a low-cost retailer. That was always doomed to failure.

    1. Re: Good by fortfive · · Score: 1

      This guy gets it. Except b&n did magazines well.

  19. The sad thing is I love B&N. by pjv936 · · Score: 1

    There is one near my work. I go there to browse at least once a week. If they all close it would suck.

  20. Lemme get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First, they fired a whole bunch of the warehouse and delivery types, deliberately sinking the lucrative holiday season with empty shelves.
    Then, "in response" to the massive loss of profit, they fire everyone making an actual - if meager - living from the stores.

    Not only is this blatant sabotage, but chances are those responsible are giving themselves large bonuses for having successfully fucked over workers and communities.
    How are these execs not impaled and on fire with their families for this? What the hell is wrong with us to simply let this shit go unpunished?

    1. Re: Lemme get this straight by nnull · · Score: 1

      Because this is the culture and society we have created. A careless society. We could start executing people like in other countries, but then that will stifle innovation and encourage more incompetence. This is something no laws will fix. People need to change. I'm all for shaming these people in public like we used to do, but people just do not care.

  21. the real estate industry is killing retail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is happening with retail outlets isn't a problem with online sellers, it is a problem with the profits being made by the real estate industry and commercial leasing. Lease costs should be GOING DOWN because demand is going down for commercial leases, but they aren't for big corporate chains like bookstores. Real estate owners don't want revenue to go down, so they put their head in the sand. What is going to happen with all that empty real estate? It is going to rot and fester -- the market can only support so many P. F. Chang's and other big restaurant experiences, because people can buy anything that isn't a service-oriented product online for a lower cost.

    So what will happen when Amazon become a monopoly for manufactured products? It looks like a total market collapse.

    1. Re: the real estate industry is killing retail by nnull · · Score: 1

      Lease price and building prices sky rocketing is what encouraged me to just build my own building. It was far far more cheaper. However, try to do that now, it's not the case anymore. They've put their tentacles in a lot of construction businessses and anyone selling empty land now. If I stayed on my last lease, seeing the rates now, I would never have been in business. And believe me, I had a lot of agencies trying to discourage me from building because they wouldnâ(TM)t be getting their luxurious commissions. It's probably the reason why Amazon and Walmart builds their own facilities as well.

      But it's definitely stifling a lot of businesses, not just small businesses anymore, but affecting a lot of medium size businesses now who can no longer afford to have their own office building. All you have to do is just drive down any commercial or industrial area and see the available signs all over the place. You'd think they would be cheap being empty for so long with the whole block being vacant and full of drug dealers. But nope.

      So I whole heartedly agree, real estate is actually the big killer of any business right now than Walmart or Amazon. I don't have any statistics on me, but I'm pretty sure the vast majority of small businesses can no longer afford the rent anymore or afford the ridiculous prices for them.

      Utility power tier levels would be my next gripe killing everything.

    2. Re: the real estate industry is killing retail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for this reply, it gives support to my theory. I have been contemplating starting my own small business and have been struggling with the numbers, I don't see the point in building a business primarily to pay the rent to someone else. There are so many terrible restaurants serving factory prepared food, with a business model that relies on a high traffic location rather than building up a base of returning customers.

  22. It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon is doing to Big Box what Big Box did to Mom & Pop. Funny; now Mom & Pops - with service - is on the rise. -T

    1. Re:It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mom and pop stores can only be successful if commercial lease costs go down. They can't compete with the "anchor store" model of shopping malls or "destination" shopping centers where the leases are unaffordable for non-corporate entities. Right now there is a major expansion of the 7-Eleven chain of convenience stores which will potentially destroy the market for "mom and pop" run corner markets, as as corporations can afford to pay slightly higher lease costs than small family run businesses.

  23. Jeez, just go to some other store. by shess · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suggest B. Dalton or Waldenbooks. I hear Borders is alright, too.

    1. Re:Jeez, just go to some other store. by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      I'll see your bet and raise you a Cokesbury.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  24. B&N does not have to die ... by Kiliani · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. but probably will.

    Couple of points:

    Independent book stores can do well, Amazon or not. They can do very well indeed if they serve the local community, if they are book lovers/book worms (at least to some reasonable degree) and not just mere brainless peddlers of books. You don't need a large inventory to make this a good experience. Provide a good user/customer experience, add value. Don't sell candles. I actually think good board games are ok, but then know your games, too.

    Go, for example, to the Book People in Austin, Texas, in the U.S. (hey, this is slashdot, stop by when you go to SXS next time). It's actually a rather large store, by square footage, but the number of different books is not all that large by comparison. A fair percentage of the books there have been read by staff and they talk about these books. Lot's of hand-written cards telling you about the books, and all those books they recommend/have read are displayed with their front page, not their spines. In fact, I'd say that close to 1/2 their display space shows the fronts of books on the shelves, not their spines. Tells you how many fewer books per linear yard of shelf space they present. You'll find a good book every time you go. I do. (I don't live there, but I visit the store when I do go.). I know, this is Austin, and Austin is weird. Still, loose the pink hair and some of your tattoos/piercing, and this works wherever you want this to work.

    In Germany one of the most well-known chains (Hugendubel) went almost bankrupt when they went the way of B&N (or more precisely, Borders). The next generation took over the leadership of the chain, and it now looks like they will actually make it and do well again. Why? Store respond to the local needs, stores got more independence, they started selling books knowledgeably again, in fact, they make their new stores smaller again (you guessed it, fewer candles, cards and videos), etc. etc. Yes, they all have a café now (why not??), which they own and operate (no chain Joe there).

    Same with Blackwell in the UK. Although the Oxford store is crazy large and friggin' amazing ... Same problems here not too long ago, and a very similar solution. Amazon does not need to kill your business. But you *do* need to adapt.

    But people are right: if management sucks, they will take the business down sooner or later. Which is why B&N may well die –or rediscover its roots in NYC. We shall see, I wish them luck. I hope they reinvent themselves, which they can if they fire management and hire people who really *want* to sell books the right way.

    BTW, I always laugh at all the comments about Amazon. Don't get me wrong, they are too large, the know too much, they suck in many parts, yada yada yada. All true. Nonetheless, we buy a lot at Amazon. When do we do it? The price has to be right, it has to be much easier than to drive around town to get the item I need, and there is no need whatsoever that I inspect/try on/evaluate the item in person before I buy it. Which is one of the reasons why I basically stopped buying books at Amazon. They treat books like crap. Books arrive damaged so often that it is not funny. On top of that, Amazon has stopped being all that cheap to begin with. No books, no electronics, no clothing (God no!), no groceries (sorry, that's just plain silly), and many others. Nice to have Amazon if you break a leg, though. I often wind up at specialty retailers (brick and mortar or online) instead. I go window shopping at Amazon a lot and then buy elsewhere (the reverse of what many stores complain about ...). And yes, you can do this anonymously if you care to, even if that means you get a different price than the next Jane doing it – but that is true no matter what you do. Amazon games us. Game back as much as you can.

    On a side: if Amazon deploys high end AI to make shopping recommendations to me, I'd rather rely on the stray cat my partner feeds outside at the moment. Can't be worse than what the cat picks. Amazon's recommendations are just so utterly, utterly useless.

    If you are a nerd/engineer, it *is* fun to see the tech of their delivery chain in the warehouses.

    --
    Do your own thing. And overdo it!
    1. Re:B&N does not have to die ... by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 2

      B&N collapsing would be good for independents since it would leave the market open for them. Then you would have the businesses that are responsive to local needs that you desire. So, it could be a very positive thing. Why worry about it.

  25. This Is Not Really Surprising ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last December, shortly before Christmas, I tried to negotiate a large (in-store) book purchase at my local Barnes & Noble. (I live in Huntsville, Alabama USA.) This is what happened.

    Tonight I was in my local Barnes & Noble store redeeming another discount store coupon. I asked to speak with the store manager. I told him I currently have ten books on my "To Buy Next" list which (I estimated) would cost in the neighborhood of $175 to $200 - if I paid full price for all ten books. I asked the manager: "What kind of discount could you give me if I agreed to buy all ten books simultaneously?" I was expecting him to say something along the lines of: "We can give you a 20 percent discount - if you agree to buy all ten." (I would follow that up by replying: "OK, that sounds good. Will you also waive shipping costs?") To my utter amazement the store manager replied: "We can't do that." Brief pause ... "If you were buying 50 copies of the same book, we could give you a discount, but not for ten different books." And that was that. Realizing that the store manager's hands were tied - such decisions are probably made at the highest levels of Barnes & Noble management up in New York - I shrugged my shoulders and walked away.

    I'm going to contact Amazon.com and make them the same offer. It will be interesting to see if Mr. Bezos recognizes my offer as an opportunity to excel.

    Post Script: Jeff Bezos did excel. When I emailed a copy of the above to Amazon.com customer assistance - I've had an account with Amazon since 1998 - they responded with an immediate (substantial) "purchase incentive" on my next order. I placed an immediate order and will be placing another [large] order, (i.e. 10-20 books), in the next few weeks.

    1. Re:This Is Not Really Surprising ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Price haggling is expected when you're buying a car, a mattress, or an expensive suit, but most retailers don't allow price negotiation. If they did, each salesperson who was authorized to cut deals has a different idea of what a good deal would be for the business - some might think any positive markup over inventory cost would be acceptable, and that is absolutely not true if you know anything about business.

  26. Agree completely that B&N is mismanaged by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I'm really not much of a book buyer or reader, so I guess you could say I'm not the B&N target market anyway. Except I've had occasion to go in there for various things, including buying childrens' books as gifts for an employee's baby shower and a search, a while back, for what I thought was a real simple item; a loop to stick on a surface to act as a pen-holder.

    That pen-holder search was a huge fiasco.... Found the product I wanted on the B&N web site and it indicated my local store had it in stock. So I walked down there on my lunch break. Couldn't find it anyplace in the store, since small "odds and ends" like that were just randomly scattered throughout the store, positioned here and there between rows of books on shelves. I asked for assistance, and was first told they didn't have the item in stock at all. I pulled out my phone and showed them their own web page that said they did. Then I was told to come back in a couple hours, because they'd need some time to locate it for me.

    At this point, I started regretting not just ordering one off Amazon to ship to me .... But I did go back hours later, to find they simply said they "had one someplace, but couldn't find it for me". I wound up getting one at an Office Depot store that weekend.

    That's generally been my B&N experience. Stores are set up so they're enjoyable to browse around at random, but terrible if you go there on a mission to buy something specific (unless it's a book they're featuring prominently at that point in time).

  27. Innovating by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    Cross-posting from SoylentNews: https://soylentnews.org/commen... Hope someone will take these ideas up.

    Physical bookstores are not innovating enough to compete with Amazon and subsidiaries (Audible, The Book Depository, etc). I worry sometimes - I like wandering in secondhand bookshops, and don't like how few there are left. I speak to people working in bookstores and there's really nothing planned, except for spinning up a website.

    That won't work.

    Amazon started with books because books are the ultimate fungible commodity. Each has an ISBN (instantly identifiable), each is equivalent to the other (unlike, say, fruit), there's little scope for fakes or adulteration (unlike jewellery), and the price points are right for moving significant volumes at low-risk. Selling on the web also adds value: a book is freeze-dried information anyway, so it's a natural fit for meta-information like reviews and recommendations. Putting a massive catalog online does not cost much in inventory, but it taps into a long, fat tail of all sorts of interests -- from game developers, to philosophers, to philosophical game developers -- all willing to wait a few days after purchase (or a few seconds, if using Kindle).

    Physical bookstores must compete in cyberspace. However, cloning Amazon's infrastructure is the wrong approach. Instead, they must blend physical and virtual presence, so customers still find value in a physical store.

    One way to do this is by turning stores into a federated hybrid marketplace.

    Imagine this:

    I walk into a book store. There's a book and a DVD box set tucked under my arm -- I bought these weeks or months ago and want to get rid of them. I walk up to an automated kiosk (in a low-tech scenario, I go to the cashier). It's something that resembles a reverse vending machine. and I scan my items. This machine has me quickly flip pages in my book to check its condition. It also has me insert the DVDs into a reader slot. Then it robot-wraps the products (shrink wrap, or cardboard mailer) and slots them into inventory. I walk away with a few dollars instantly available in my account. I'll be credited more 'on consignment', when the items sell.

    I turn into the main store and walk the aisles. A book interests me in the Business section. I start browsing. I whip out my mobile and an app recognises the book, providing recommendations and reviews. A 'What's Related' gallery pops up related books. These are from the bookseller's extended catalog and the catalog of other booksellers this bookseller federates with. Now a different book has caught my fancy. This seems to cover the topic better. It has better, more passionate reviews. And there's a really good deal on a second-hand copy somebody deposited five minutes ago on the other side of the continent. Satisfied, I place the order. There's a bit of automated-haggling as my app negotiates the price range set by the seller, and with stores on both side of the continent. A couple of seconds, and the transaction closes successfully. My preferences request delivery to this store. I come here on weekends anyway; I'll pick it up when I'm in next, sit down on the sofa and have a read.

    The cashier gives me a friendly wave. He saw the transaction go through -- I've known him a few years and my browse/buy settings are open to him. He'll probably be handing me the parcel next week (if I'm in during business hours; otherwise, it'll be the vending dispenser). We chat a bit -- turns out he's interested in the same topic. As I chat, I notice a pencil loop [amazon.com]. That'd be great for the notebook I always carry around. I purchase it and affix it to my notebook.

    It's been a good day. I quite enjoyed that.

  28. B&N Shot their own feet.... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    A decade ago B&N marketed an eReader that was ahead of anything else on the market. Amazon was a year away from anything close to competitive to the inexpensive almost tablet that was the Nook Color. But what did B&N management do; they locked it into only doing business with the "Nook Store" and prevented installing standard Android Apps. Sorry bubba, walled gardens get neglected and turn into weed lots. I did a lot of business with B&N until they became the more expensive with less service store.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT