Slashdot Mirror


Would You Fear Alien Life or Welcome It? (cnet.com)

If you've ever watched a science fiction movie about aliens, you'll know that humans tend to freak out and destroy everything when faced with incontrovertible proof of the existence of alien life. But a new analysis from Arizona State University psychology professor Michael Varnum and his colleagues suggests that humans might actually remain pretty calm and collected when that big news breaks. CNET reports: Varnum makes this conclusion based on an analysis of newspaper articles covering past potential discoveries of extraterrestrial life. Specifically, he and his colleagues looked at articles about the weird dimming of so-called "Tabby's Star," Earth-like planets around the star Trappist-1, and the potential discovery of Martian microbe fossils from 1996. They found language in the stories demonstrated much more positive emotion than fear or other negative emotions. In a second study, the team also surveyed over 500 people, asking them to guess how they and humanity would react to an announcement that alien microbial life had been discovered. In the case of both their own reaction and everyone else's, the participants hypothesized responses that were more positive than negative. The research was published last month in Frontiers in Psychology.

226 comments

  1. Micro vs Macro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm less concerned about the planet being blown up in 24 hours when talking about microbes. Here's to hoping they aren't contagious though

  2. Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Z80a · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given the only truly unique resource we have is our media, there is a possibility that the aliens would be here just to pirate everything, fly away and sell it on some space market.

    1. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Given the only truly unique resource we have is our media, there is a possibility that the aliens would be here just to pirate everything, fly away and sell it on some space market.

      I'm thinking that the aliens will be interested in our socialist media. They will hack Facebook and meddle with the world's election systems to get themselves elected. Then we will all be enslaved building pyramid alien monuments, and be slowing siphoned off as food.

      Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Z80a · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about just the modern media, i'm talking about EVERYTHING.

      And there's nothing RIAA/MPAA/ESA or disney can do to stop it.
      Our DRMs will be cracked in seconds.

    3. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we will all be enslaved building pyramid alien monuments, and be slowing siphoned off as food.

      ... and the alien leader will trick us into working on the pyramid by claiming that it is "just a wall" and that someone else will pay for it.

    4. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I had a sexual fantasy of the first encounter with a female space pirate of a desirable race, copying our Earthly media and selling at the intergalactic market just a few weeks ago, and then your comment appears in Slashdot.. There is something in the air, definitely.

    5. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by DeBaas · · Score: 2

      Give them as a sample the X-factor and dancing on ice. They'll move on and never bother us again.

      --
      ---
    6. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the meat market, im sure human is tasty to something!

    7. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Give them an episode or two of "Keeping Up with the Kardashians" and nobody out there will ever visit us!

    8. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Our DRMs will be cracked in seconds.

      Since when do you need aliens for that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Careful, don't overdo it, with that they just might consider exterminating us being necessary for the greater good of the galaxy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Give them an episode or two of "Keeping Up with the Kardashians" and nobody out there will ever visit us!

      Now you're being cruel

      --
      ---
    11. Re: Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by jasko2007 · · Score: 1

      Poooor milenia kid

    12. Re: Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the alien! And boy is he hostile!

    13. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      I forget if it was Douglas Adams or who talking about WWII being a cultural drama for aliens, with a climax of two thermonuclear detonations...

    14. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Socialist Media? Do you mean WSWS.org and a-infos?

    15. Re: Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? Show them that and they will flock here from lightyears away, just to see the finest females in the galaxy.

    16. Re:Stay calm, unless you're RIAA/MPAA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.

      I thought Chthulhu had a better platform.

  3. Betteridge's applies by Sperbels · · Score: 0

    Betterridge says No.

    1. Re:Betteridge's applies by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Betterridge says No.

      No you would't fear alien life or no you wouldn't welcome it? This is one of those cases where Betterridge is ambiguous.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Betteridge's applies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is a No. As in "No" and "No" and "No" again.

      Its not either or. Its: "Not welcoming", "not afraid" and "there are no aliens to fear anyway".

      Or, "I am significantly more afraid of humans".

      --
      Disclaimer: I am an alien.

    3. Re:Betteridge's applies by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Betterridge says No.

      Ian Betteridge was a human.

      And as (Spock) logic would kindly dictate, your weak human concepts and limitations should not be automatically applied here.

      Stop thinking like a human. We're talking about the infinite possibilities surrounding alien life.

    4. Re:Betteridge's applies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those possibilities is "it eats planets".

    5. Re: Betteridge's applies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infinite? No. If that was even remotely true then we'd find life everywhere we looked.

    6. Re: Betteridge's applies by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Infinite? No. If that was even remotely true then we'd find life everywhere we looked.

      Or maybe the universe is a bit bigger than you think is.

  4. first impression vs lasting impression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most enlightened people would think neat at first introduction.
    Then after the murderous terraforming starts minds might change!

  5. Life by tquasar · · Score: 1

    Would alien life fear us or welcome us, that is the question.

    1. Re:Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point they'd be wise to avoid us. Moreover, I do not think people have any business attempting to leave earth (e.g. attempting go to Mars), until we have truly solved our "issues" A to Z. Until we do, spreading ourselves about wouldn't be doing the universe any favours.

    2. Re:Life by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Would alien life fear us or welcome us, that is the question.

      I'm fairly convinced any discovery of alien life is bad bad news for us.
      If its the more likely finding if microbial life, we'd have to wonder what happened to the complex life, and is there some "great filter" that means our time is numbered.

      And if its complex grey-alien type life, we're screwed because they'd take one look at our hyper aggressive territorial species that's insane enough to use nukes on our own species and conclude that since we're on the brink of hitting the stars were simply far too dangerous to keep around.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A species with space travel has access to astronomically higher technology. They would be manipulating energy on a different scale than us. Even if they haven't weaponized it, it's not hard to go from practical to destructive. Functional gasoline or fission is hard, destructive is saying "Whoops."

      Point is, we're no threat. It's like not spears vs nukes (a few thousand years delta) it's more like cellular mucus barrier vs supernova. I'd say the delta in years between two species is likely on the order of at least e5-6, could be e10+. This also means you're more likely to draw a royal flush tonight than have The Encounter in your microscopic e2.

      If it's merely a question of awareness-of-homosapien, the delta still applies, but if they HAPPEN to be at a nascent detection stage (ie our SETI) they're likely to worry that we're the ones a billion years ahead, and couldn't touch us. If they're not at that stage, and are well-developed at the time of detection, I suppose they still might worry we have a superior growth rate and could be a catch-up threat a million years from now. This obligatory exception is the only place where "earth gets deleted" has any room to be discussed. But it's kind of a "Sol is gonna burn out someday!" problem to the aliens, they'd take their time.

      Conquering is unlikely. AFAIK the raw resources of a planet aren't that valuable. I suppose it's possible that an unknown, precious, exhaustible Unobtainium exists (chemist laughing intensifies) and it only occurs on organic planets.

      We are of little tangible use, but our information should be a little appealing. Science progress isn't always linear.

      In the absence of anything to gain, including a sense of safety*, the most likely outcome of The Encounter is they welcome us. Enlighten us. Because if they have any sense of ego (we sure do) they'll do it just so they can say they did. Whether that's truly scotsman-grade "noble" is a more tedious question, but we can expect the probable scenario is (ostentatious) generosity.

      *hopefully they've progress beyond this bullshit, and their governing groups aren't obsessed with pursuing/exploiting boogeymen

    4. Re: Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nukes? Waaaahhhaahhaaahahaa... yes because I'm sure all those aliens are anti nuke SJW who ate trump.

      Stop anthropomorphisming creatures you know nothing about and doing the standard lefty thing of thinking everyone thinks just like you.

      So stupid.

  6. I for one... by darkain · · Score: 2

    I for one, welcome our new alien overlords!

    1. Re:I for one... by sheramil · · Score: 1

      BETTER THAN DRUMPF, AMIRITE?

      Seriously though, there's 7 replies here and no one has posted anything political yet. What's up with that?

      I'd like to think we're starting to get over the /pol/ sickness. Not everything is about America.

    2. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one am hoping for horny space goats

  7. Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    This novel is about how the Culture deals with an Outside Context Problem (OCP), the kind of problem "most civilizations would encounter just once, and which they tended to encounter rather in the same way a sentence encountered a full stop."

    This is a problem that is "outside the context" as it is generally not considered until it occurs, and the capacity to actually conceive of or consider the OCP in the first place may not be possible or very limited (i.e., the majority of the group's population may not have the knowledge or ability to realize that the OCP can arise, or assume it is extremely unlikely). An example of OCP is an event in which a civilization does not consider the possibility that a much more technologically advanced society can exist, and then encounters one. The term is coined by Banks for the purpose of this novel, and described as follows:

    The usual example given to illustrate an Outside Context Problem was imagining you were a tribe on a largish, fertile island; you'd tamed the land, invented the wheel or writing or whatever, the neighbors were cooperative or enslaved but at any rate peaceful and you were busy raising temples to yourself with all the excess productive capacity you had, you were in a position of near-absolute power and control which your hallowed ancestors could hardly have dreamed of and the whole situation was just running along nicely like a canoe on wet grass... when suddenly this bristling lump of iron appears sailless and trailing steam in the bay and these guys carrying long funny-looking sticks come ashore and announce you've just been discovered, you're all subjects of the Emperor now, he's keen on presents called tax and these bright-eyed holy men would like a word with your priests.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Japanese you must decide upon Seppuku or Isolation; therefore isolation is the only rational answer until the aliens invade using weapons. Then the answer logically becomes how to permanently prevent a contagion. This is a known outcome; its time to get over the guilt of being completely right.

    2. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      Well if we follow the Japanese example we'll reorganize our society on alien lines, get technological parity and then go into full on 'conquer the universe' mode

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Of course the technological difference between Perry and the Japanese wasn't that great.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Hey! An intelligent commenter!
      To my mind, it would depend upon how the aliens presented themselves visually --- giant creepy spiders I cannot tolerate, nor any snake-like life forms, but if they be magnificent and beautiful females, that would be most welcome (although, preferably, natural ones, not the ones the Trumpster and that golfing athlete prefer, the ones with fake boobies --- that's a No-No!).

    4. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My favorite line from that story was something like, "Perhaps the reason for our vaunted moral superiority is simply that we never found anything really tempting - before this."

    5. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's interesting in the refugee crisis in Europe how the fact that the refugees were young men affected the way men and women reacted to the idea of letting them in.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this sort of discussion makes me think that maybe we are being prepared. If I was in charge of the government, or at least the part of the government that knows about aliens, I might want to make sure that the populace would not totally freak out about aliens when they were announced. Periodically, I would make sure there were studies does to see what people would think if they met them. And I would try to influence the media so that aliens were seen as relatively friendly, and, though odd and hard to communicate with (like 'Arrival' or 'ET'), were not an existential threat.

    7. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I doubt there's some sort of conspiracy to cover up the existence of aliens. If they're discovered it will be like this

      1) Astronomers find an anomalous thing - e.g a signal
      2) They publish
      3) Other groups take their research and analyse it
      4) At some point someone will say "We think this is not a natural signal but rather the result of an extra terrestrial intelligence
      5) An absolute shit storm will break out with people arguing for and against and doing more observations
      6) At some point the idea that it's an ETI will become something most people believe. Then again if we find aliens this way the odds are they'll be so far away that it's not practical to communicate with them over any sort of reasonable time scale.

      E.g. the signal from the first pulsar found was called 'the LGM signal', a slightly jokey reference to the possibility it was Little Green Men.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The first pulsar was observed on November 28, 1967, by Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Antony Hewish. They observed pulses separated by 1.33 seconds that originated from the same location on the sky, and kept to sidereal time. In looking for explanations for the pulses, the short period of the pulses eliminated most astrophysical sources of radiation, such as stars, and since the pulses followed sidereal time, it could not be man-made radio frequency interference. When observations with another telescope confirmed the emission, it eliminated any sort of instrumental effects. At this point, Bell Burnell said of herself and Hewish that "we did not really believe that we had picked up signals from another civilization, but obviously the idea had crossed our minds and we had no proof that it was an entirely natural radio emission. It is an interesting problem-if one thinks one may have detected life elsewhere in the universe, how does one announce the results responsibly?" Even so, they nicknamed the signal LGM-1, for "little green men" (a playful name for intelligent beings of extraterrestrial origin). It was not until a second pulsating source was discovered in a different part of the sky that the "LGM hypothesis" was entirely abandoned. Their pulsar was later dubbed CP 1919, and is now known by a number of designators including PSR 1919+21 and PSR J1921+2153. Although CP 1919 emits in radio wavelengths, pulsars have subsequently been found to emit in visible light, X-ray, and gamma ray wavelengths.

      There's no evidence that any of the steps 1) to 3) are being suppressed. And anyone can try to do any of those steps. It's just that for 4) they need to convince people they're right and it's not something natural, i.e. they need to survive the shitstorm that would happen in step 5)

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re: Iain M. Banks on 'Outside Context Problems' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a most excellent point --- sgt_doom

  8. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by Z80a · · Score: 2

    It's ok to be white.
    You're not responsible by what your ancestors did and you have no impossible "historical debt" to pay
    Just treat everyone with respect, independent of their physical characteristics and everything fix itself eventually.

  9. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On if the meeting entails an anal probe.

    1. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And on that note, on the shape and surface properties of the said probe. If it is a tissue collecting device, with a hook, blade and a sinker on top, then maybe not so much. Unless they remove permanently and painlessly a tumor while they're at it. Free alien medical care!!11!!

  10. OH GOD! by Arzaboa · · Score: 0

    NO!

    --
    Adam

  11. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also factor in intelligence. What if we find a planet with life but the most intelligent species are smart as our dogs? What if we found out their meat is delicious. Will we domesticate them for meat? How smart they do have to be for us to treat them as equals? By that measure will advanced aliens even consider us sentient?

  12. Hopefully welcoming by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I'd try to be welcoming; hopefully there wouldn't be cause for fear - whether from the aliens themselves or from humans making a wrong impression on them

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:Hopefully welcoming by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      To take it back a step: If it's simply a signal, indicating technologically advanced life, I suspect most humans would be elated - especially if the signal could be determined to originate from 50,000 ly distant. As a science fiction reader, I would immediately ponder "I wonder how advanced they are now?". Those who might be scared by a physical contact may be relieved that the distance is so vast, and plug their ears when people like me tell them that the aliens, if not extinct may be about 50,000 years more advanced than us. I would like to know if they went extinct, and if so, why and how, so we could head off future potential threats to our own species. Every technology which we might glean from the signals would be icing on the cake.

      Microbes discovered in the Venusian atmosphere? I would be very genuinely concerned about cross-contamination - you know, from those who will argue that it must be brought down to the surface of the earth (in situ and ISS analysis too expensive, vestigial cold war paranoia demands control it, etc.).

    2. Re:Hopefully welcoming by jouassou · · Score: 2

      Microbes discovered in the Venusian atmosphere? I would be very genuinely concerned about cross-contamination - you know, from those who will argue that it must be brought down to the surface of the earth

      Luckily, that's a falsifiable hypothesis. Basically all life on Earth uses the same DNA code, where 64 nitrogen base triplets map to 20 distinct amino acids (plus some controls, like start/stop codons).

      Even if alien life evolved in a similar way as us, it's unlikely that they'd use exactly the same amino acids: there are millions of known amino acids, and they form spontaneously without life. Even on Earth, there are a couple of species that use an extra amino acid or two compared to us.

      However, even if it turns out that those 20 amino acids are somehow universal, the mapping from DNA codes to amino acids is completely arbitrary. It's the ASCII of Earth biology. So the laws of combinatorics means that at least their DNA code shouldn't match our unless we share a common ancestor.

      So if we find DNA we can understand, we share an ancestor.

    3. Re:Hopefully welcoming by dryeo · · Score: 2

      There's also the panspermia hypothesis where life has colonized the planets of the solar system (or further) and all the life is related, eg life originating on Venus and colonizing the Earth (and Mars) through meteors or such, in which case it may very well use the same amino acids. There's also the science fictional idea of a former civilization seeding the galaxy with life.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:Hopefully welcoming by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      "Even if alien life evolved in a similar way as us, it's unlikely that they'd use exactly the same amino acids"

      Good points, but since we can't know for certain, I would still be concerned. Then there's always mutation & evolutionary processes. In the meantime, I'm not going to worry about it - I'm more concerned about some rogue state/terrorist group developing genetically re-engineered terrestrial-based pathogens*.

      *tinfoil hat secured

    5. Re:Hopefully welcoming by jouassou · · Score: 1

      That's why I phrased it as common ancestor: panspermia should also be a testable hypothesis :). If we find lifeforms on Venus or Mars that doesn't seem to be directly related to anything on Earth today (which it would be if the contamination was due to our recent space missions), but still uses the same DNA coding as us, then it's very likely that we share an ancestor sometime in the distant past. One might argue that the way DNA maps to amino acids can mutate over time, but given that basically all life on Earth still uses the same code after billions of years of evolutionary divergence, I think it's likely that at least parts of the code should still be the same.

      With that said, I personally think it's more likely that life simply originated on Earth, where you have global oceans as a huge outdoors experiment going on for a hundred million years to forge the first primitive lifeforms, than that by accident a piece of rock found its way between two habitable worlds. I think the timeline of life would probably also be different if panspermia was the case: why would it take a billion years to evolve something as basic as photosynthesis? But if we find an alien lifeform, we should find some more answers :).

    6. Re:Hopefully welcoming by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Microbes tend to be optimised for a fairly narrow range of conditions. I suspect something that's at home in Venusian clouds might find it a little chilly - not to mention unpleasantly alkaline - round here.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. It depends on how they behave. Duh. by Qbertino · · Score: 0

    Captain Obvious was glad to help.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:It depends on how they behave. Duh. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      For example, if Sy Snootles gives great BJ's, she's in.

  14. Hasn't worked out well in our history by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In every case where an advanced civilization has encountered a much less advanced civilization, it hasn't worked out well for the less advanced civilization. Ask Native Americans if they think that the arrival of Europeans was good for their culture.

    So, why should we expect that the arrival of aliens (who one can expect to be much more advanced than us) would be good for us?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by symes · · Score: 1

      I don't think advanced human civilization meets less advanced civilization and all goes wrong is something we can apply to aliens from outer space. For one, humans meeting humans in the same space mean they are potential competitors or at least hold territory the more advanced guys would like to own.

      Aliens from outer space might want Earthly resources, or they might not, it is not a given. Given the aliens traveled here using technology we do not possess my guess is the need for Earth-like resources could be met by visiting a whole range of unoccupied planets. So they are probably here to meet us. So I'd be more upbeat in the long term outcomes of aliens popping over to say hello.

    2. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      the need for Earth-like resources could be met by visiting a whole range of unoccupied planets.

      Only if the resource they need is minerals or water. Not if it's lunch.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      That depends. If they are expanding in our neck of the galactic woods, and do not have the means to easily go to other distant solar systems (i.e. have no FTL travel that lets them go anywhere at the blink of an eye), then they might well see us as potential competition, and decide it's best to wipe us out before we spread. Would aliens undertake an incredibly long - perhaps multi generation - journey at enormous cost just to say hi? Perhaps. But they certainly would to wipe out a perceived thread to their existence.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In one of my favorite pieces of fiction, what encounters earth is a galactic federation which, upon discovering that humans are the most bloodthirsty thing in the galaxy, seals off the entire solar system because no one wants to risk any kind of debris, inspiration or worse yet a single piece of technology finding its way to earth's surface and being found by any survivors, given how quickly we learn to kill with anything we find.

      At least, until some omnicidal tinpot-dictatorship of a space-empire decides it should be totally capable of controlling such a plague to take over the universe, and sneaks some toys into the cage.

    5. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm (part) Native American and I am glad for the mixing of cultures. We've benefitted tremendously from the adding of European's. You make the mistake of seeing all Native Americans as one monolithic failure but the reality is most of us adapted and merged with the waves of Europeans and benefitted from the change.

    6. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      If, by more advanced, you mean more tightly packed into shithole cities and highly exposed to all kinds of microbial agents - with global air-travel we might just have the upper hand on "advanced" aliens who have transcended the desire to overpopulate.

    7. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by rleibman · · Score: 1

      The likelihood that our two chemistries are compatible enough to eat one another is small, and even if they are, a species that can travel across light years, with all the power and tech that requires is likely to be able to manufacture their food much cheaply than what it would take to come down the gravity well just to get lunch.

    8. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about culture. I don't like most of our culture. The main point is most of the Native Americans ended up dead.

    9. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      For the native americans then? It was terrible.
      For the native americans that survived and their descendants? Not so bad.

      They're no longer stuck in a dead-end culture that hadn't invented the wheel, medicine, open ocean navigation, literacy, or mathematics. Now they have lifespans almost that of the advanced culture that overran them, and tax- and educational-advantages in which the faintest willingness to work hard and not become a drug-dependent welfare monkey means it's easy to get an excellent free education and make LOTS of income.

      Probably wouldn't be much different. Most aliens wouldn't bother to exterminate us once they had what they wanted and we stopped being lethally annoying.

      --
      -Styopa
    10. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Whibla · · Score: 1

      Not if it's lunch.

      Or "sport".

    11. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds very similar to, With Friends Like These, by Alan Dean Foster

      The basic plot was that when humans were first identified the aliens ran a technology curve on the Humans and found that they would eventually dominate the other cultures. The current head cultures decided to lock down Earth, as you mentioned.

      Eventually emissaries from the alien cultures come to Earth, explain that they old ruling cultures had dies off and that they are now met with an external threat that they cannot face. The humans are presented as country bumpkins, all nice and simple until one of the aliens falls down a hole and discovers that the entire planed it one mass of technology.

      The humans accept the deal, the aliens remove the lockdown (it is apparent that the humans were just waiting for an invitations) and thousands (millions) of spacecraft leave the surface into space.

    12. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by dddux · · Score: 1

      Two things: why do you assume aliens have to be like us? Do you really think a predatory society like ours that feeds upon the "weaker, less civilised and technologically developed" is how things are throughout the Universe? Everything is relevant. They might be like us, but they might be different. Second thing: our resources. Don't you think there is plenty of resources in the Universe for everybody so you don't have to go "hunting"? It's ridiculous to think that someone would enslave us for our resources. There's nothing we have they couldn't find anywhere in the Universe, without having to enslave, or just deal with anybody. The only original resource they might crave is us and our animals, or plants. For food? As slaves? That is possible.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    13. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by dddux · · Score: 1

      I think "sport" is reserved only for the less developed civilisations.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    14. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they have the technology for interstellar space travel they exceed us in technology by maybe 1000's if not millions of years. They could breed as much "lunch" as they desire on any number of planets without the cost of interstellar travel for a snack.

    15. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You're assuming they don't have hipsters who want to tweet about how free range has a more artisan taste.

      Now you'd think a sufficiently advanced civilisation would have found a way to eliminate them, but we've got them and the Romans didn't.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically the so-called "advanced civilisations" that encountered less advanced civilisations weren't actually all that civilised, and even today the best of our civilisation has some way to go before really being civilised. So we can't really judge how a truly advanced civilisation will interact with us.

      But any civilisation that is capable of visiting us, is capable of wiping us out, so if they choose to talk to us instead, we might as well welcome them. If they mean to do us harm, we won't be able to stop them anyway.

    17. Re:Hasn't worked out well in our history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear this all the time and it seems to imply we would be wiped out. But that has not been the case. Native Americans did suffer mightily and some tribes ceased to exist but they still exist now and are modern americans. And even the tribes that no longer exist likely still have ancestors that do. Even now they are coming to the conclusion that the neanderthal did mate into our species way back when. So you know we might lose our "culture" but assume whatever the aliens super tech culture is. That would not be so bad for me as long as there is no like space trail of tears type of thing.

  15. I don't even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome people from other countries.

  16. I would welcome them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I would ask if they could take me back to their world, because this one I am currently on is scary!

  17. Insufficient Data by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    First, any aliens will be literally alien to us. We have no way to predict what some alien intelligence might look like. Predators? Aliens? Arisians? Would we taste good to them, or them to us? At present, all we have are our fears and imaginations.

  18. Count me out by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    The bleached Tribble on Trump's head kind of freaks me out.

  19. Brang it on. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    How much worse could it be with aliens?

    Here's a joke:

    So, the aliens land on the White House lawn and say, "Take us to your leader".
    They are brought to Vladimir Putin.

    [I see you there laughing. Even mi and APK cracked a smile. Don't deny it.]

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re: Brang it on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe 6 months ago when most people still had faith in the FBI and doj but now that we know obama era leadership of both orgs was dirty as post anal panty stains the Putin meme is dead.

      Only the most ignorant AND radical SJW types still buy into the Putin/Trump collusion conspiracy. Everyone else knows that IF there was a conspiracy it was Hillary and her minions deeply involved with Russians, not Trump.

      So, no, no one grinned or thought it was funny outside your tiny bubble. It was boring and lame and shows how totally out of touch you are.

      Try FreeBSD is Dead jokes. At least this is the right audience.

    2. Re: Brang it on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure Ivan, why don't you go back to 4chan, unless you are still banned for the cp

  20. Mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... might actually remain pretty calm and collected when that big news breaks ...

    Stories about Alien creatures have been mainstream culture since 1910. We've had over 100 years to get used to the idea, although that may not change our emotions when we actually see one.

  21. Murphy's law of quantum superposition by Solandri · · Score: 2

    If we fear it and kill the first alien visitor, they will turn out to be peaceful and friendly, and our hostile reaction will cause galactic civilizations to shun and ostracize us.

    If we welcome it and greet the first alien visitor with open arms, they will turn out to be conquerors who will ruthlessly subjugate the planet, enslaving half the population and eating the other half.

    1. Re:Murphy's law of quantum superposition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are women more tasty then men?

    2. Re:Murphy's law of quantum superposition by Kjella · · Score: 2

      I think it's overly optimistic that our opinion would matter. Either we're likely to discover some extinct or microbiological life that is no threat to us at all or a civilization so advanced that even if we were aggressive it'd be like those isolated Amazon tribes throwing spears after helicopters. Remember that 10000 years ago we were cavemen, in 10000 years we'll either be demigods or have destroyed ourselves. In the billions of years the universe has existed we're a very tiny blip and that we should happen to meet aliens on even remotely the same technological level seems unlikely.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Murphy's law of quantum superposition by mentil · · Score: 1

      I imagine the 'Alien ambassador is killed due to misunderstanding' trope will be well-worn in the fiction/parables/diplomacy literature of an intelligent alien species. I imagine they'll be understanding rather than immediately switch to "kill all humans!!"
      Chances are especially high that they'd communicate via drone, since a) they can engineer it to look like our drones, so it wouldn't look so disconcerting
      b) they can do so without putting the messenger at risk, and
      c) they could observe us without giving us any useful data about their biology, if we were hostile and wanted to develop say bio-weapons that targeted their race, or figure out their physical weaknesses

      Any aliens capable of interstellar flight would have food production and labor automation solved long ago. They could perhaps enslave other races out of hubris rather than deriving any benefit, but they'd be too busy fighting and enslaving their own factions to ever reach us. Enslaving us would be as impressive as us enslaving a clowder of cats.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    4. Re:Murphy's law of quantum superposition by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      They'll likely have seen our movies and I'm sure they will conclude from that that we are peaceful.

    5. Re:Murphy's law of quantum superposition by dddux · · Score: 1

      Really good one! :))

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    6. Re:Murphy's law of quantum superposition by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      But so obviously wrong though. The invasion will be delayed and eventually cancelled because they keep 'studying' our extensive production of porn.

  22. Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should the Mayans and Aztecs have feared the Spanish conquistadors, or welcomed them?
    Should the Aborigines have welcomed the colonizers from England, or feared them?
    Should the American Indians have feared the colonizers from Europe, or welcomed them?
    Should the North American beavers have welcomed the colonizers from Europe, or feared them?

    When people fantasize about intelligent alien visitors, they usually place their intelligence level and physical characteristics close to our own. I am certain that would not be the case. Most likely they would mash us like potatoes. On the off chance they come in peace, the level of disruption they would cause to our worldwide community and economy would be immense.

    1. Re:Indians by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Should the Mayans and Aztecs have feared the Spanish conquistadors, or welcomed them?
      Should the Aborigines have welcomed the colonizers from England, or feared them?
      Should the American Indians have feared the colonizers from Europe, or welcomed them?
      Should the North American beavers have welcomed the colonizers from Europe, or feared them?

      When people fantasize about intelligent alien visitors, they usually place their intelligence level and physical characteristics close to our own. I am certain that would not be the case. Most likely they would mash us like potatoes. On the off chance they come in peace, the level of disruption they would cause to our worldwide community and economy would be immense.

      European colonization was undertaken by a culture primitive by our standards, not to mention the standards of technologically advanced aliens.

      Using European colonization as a template for alien contact will serve us about as well as using local conflicts as a template for European colonization served aboriginal populations.

      Aliens are unlikely to mash us like potatoes if for no other reason than they don't need to, they'll come at us with an extremely complex civilizations and deal with us without the bounds of the rules of that civilization.

      I think an "extinguish all other intelligent life" rule is unlikely if for no other reason than they really don't want that rule to be in effect if they encounter a superior civilization. More likely we'll be pulled into some kind of interstellar bureaucracy, the objectives of which change on whether one species or multiple species is actually in change.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re: Indians by jecowa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Earth develops the warp engine and can travel 10,000 times the speed of light. A planet is discovered containing extra terrestrials with technology as advanced as the Native Americans were in the 1700s. How do you think the people of Earth would treat them? If the alein planet were found to be rich in a valuable natural resource, do you think this would change Earth's reaction?

      --
      my opportunity to freely express myself with the potential persecution and hangings and such
    3. Re: Indians by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should make a movie about that. Make the aliens blue, just because.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re: Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the energy required to warp space, I'd say we wouldn't have much use for their resources.

    5. Re: Indians by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Also make them have weird hair sex with their alien horses. Just because.

    6. Re: Indians by dddux · · Score: 1

      From our perspective, as things are now, I wouldn't be surprised at all. However, our perspective could change in the future when we finally start using fusion energy and become generally more developed. That is only how we are perceiving things right now. We are still as primitive as we were hundreds of years ago, despite the technological progress. We are still dumb pre-historic people in our minds. We are still obsessed with expansion and resources. Now imagine a society that can have all the resources and planets they want. Why would they want are measly resources and our planet? They would come over for a chat, or most probably just ignore us, at least until we get so developed that they won't be able to ignore us any more.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    7. Re: Indians by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Earth develops the warp engine and can travel 10,000 times the speed of light. A planet is discovered containing extra terrestrials with technology as advanced as the Native Americans were in the 1700s. How do you think the people of Earth would treat them? If the alein planet were found to be rich in a valuable natural resource, do you think this would change Earth's reaction?

      If we have a warp engine then valuable resources are abundant without having to affect any civilization. Earth based conflict is inherently because of the limited resources we have, those limits disappear with interstellar travel so their would be no reason to treat them any different.

    8. Re: Indians by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Any civilization capable of inter-stellar travel should be able to easily extract a seemingly limitless supply of resources from the host Star. No one in their right mind would even attempt to extract resources from planets. Sorry if science is ruining science fiction.

    9. Re: Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should the North American beavers have welcomed the colonizers from Europe, or feared them?

      As a European, I sure would like to check out these north American beavers, in a way they would appreciate. Perhaps feed them to the point they feel stuffed...

    10. Re: Indians by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yeah, have them all just born with a compatible data connector.

      OST, can that. It's pushing suspension of disbelief too far. Yes, Apple, I did look at you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  23. they're probably already here and feeding off us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the things we call viruses are aliens. just not big and organized.
    if the big and organized aliens do arrive here they'll still have to apply for citizenship of the country they want to stay in. of course if they provide a big monetary stake they could probably get in without trouble after the biological tests.
     

  24. Advancement of Humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the technology required for FTL travel, if an alien species DID manage to reach the Earth, it will likely be FAR more advanced than us technologically. With this in mind, there's really only 4 possible scenarios: reconnaissance, plunder, destruction, or assistance. So there's a 2/4 chance our race is fucked, a 1/4 chance that we don't notice anything at all, and a 1/4 chance of becoming a thriving interstellar civilization.

  25. Death by deesine · · Score: 1

    Do you fear it or welcome it?

    --
    damaged by dogma
  26. FEAR! by DrTJ · · Score: 1

    Simple Logic:
    1. Human are afraid of the unknown. Every horror movie director knows this. It seems to be evolutionally programmed into us. (Perhaps for good reasons)
    2. We would know extremely little about the aliens, i.e. being a very big unknown.

    1 and 2 => Fear, big time!

    Is it possible to concieve a more polarized "we and them" situation? On top of that, they stepping on to our (rather defensless) lawn with equipment that took them across star systems?

    How would it be anything but a paralyzing fear and panic if they'd show up?

    1. Re: FEAR! by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Simple Logic:
      1. Human are afraid of the unknown. Every horror movie director knows this. It seems to be evolutionally programmed into us. (Perhaps for good reasons)

      Tell that to the hundreds of thousands of humans who sailed the unknown seas, bashed their way through unknown jungles, explored the unknown depths of the oceans, and blasted off into the unknowns of space.

      The problem with "simple logic" is that it's almost always overly simplistic.

  27. Aliens can't or won't visit us by iamhassi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sorry but aliens were invented to convince dumb people to give smart scientists money. Let me explain. No life can exist without a sun, which is actually a star. The closest star to us is about 4 light years away. That means it takes light 4 years to travel that distance. Light travels extremely fast, 186,287 miles per second, and according to special relativity we can never go the speed of light because it requires infinite energy. So even if we could go a speed we can never go, it would take 4 years to get to the closest star. From there the distance goes up. Those stars you see in the sky are hundreds and thousands of light years away, which means at the fastest speed man has ever heard of, it would still take hundreds or thousands of years to reach. But imagine for a second there is some being that has the technology to travel that fast, why in the hell would they waste hundreds or thousands of years to visit us? Their technology compared to ours is like comparing humans to ants, there is nothing interesting about us at all compared to them. So aliens either don't exist or can't or won't visit us

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by sheramil · · Score: 1

      No life can exist without a sun, which is actually a star... according to special relativity we can never go the speed of light because it requires infinite energy... it would take 4 years to get to the closest star... why in the hell would they waste hundreds or thousands of years to visit us?

      Perhaps they are relentless pedants and they're coming to disabuse you of your preconceptions which are DEMONSTRABLY WRONG.

    2. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's conceivable that some sort of wormhole technology could be used to get around the speed limit. But your main premise is true.

      The Universe is very large and it would be incredible difficult to find us, even if the speed limit could be broken.

      I forget who proposed this, but they said that our first indication of an advanced civilization interested in finding inhabited places, or resources, would be a wave of self governing machines. Their purpose would be to find what interests the civilization and phone home for further investigation/exploitation.

      In fact, the lack of us seeing these machines may be proof that there are no advanced civilization interested in exploration within a billion or so light years. They would have had to mature some time ago but it's awful quite out there.

      The problem with this line of thought is that tomorrow might be the intersection of their launch of a swarm with the distance they are from us.

    3. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry but aliens were invented to convince dumb people to give smart scientists money. Let me explain. No life can exist without a sun, which is actually a star. The closest star to us is about 4 light years away. That means it takes light 4 years to travel that distance. Light travels extremely fast, 186,287 miles per second, and according to special relativity we can never go the speed of light because it requires infinite energy. So even if we could go a speed we can never go, it would take 4 years to get to the closest star. From there the distance goes up. Those stars you see in the sky are hundreds and thousands of light years away, which means at the fastest speed man has ever heard of, it would still take hundreds or thousands of years to reach. But imagine for a second there is some being that has the technology to travel that fast, why in the hell would they waste hundreds or thousands of years to visit us? Their technology compared to ours is like comparing humans to ants, there is nothing interesting about us at all compared to them. So aliens either don't exist or can't or won't visit us

      "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so."

      To clarify my H2G2 reference, time is a human concept. Humans tend to have a specific definition of a lifetime based on our biological makeup and limitations, roughly equating to a century or less. We have no idea what alien makeup will be, but logic dictates that their definition of a lifetime will be relative.

      There are countless galaxies in existence, and you are failing to take into account that an alien lifetime could last a million light years, and a trip to our planet could be no more than a lunchtime break for them, even traveling considerably slower than our perceived light-speed limits.

      TL; DR - Stop limiting your thinking within human-defined bounds. Whomever may come and visit, I just hope they know how to make a decent Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster. It would certainly help answer the question posed here.

    4. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The closest star to us is about 4 light years away.

      Actually, the closest star to us is about 8 light minutes away.

      But yeah, there is no real reason for aliens to visit, except maybe curiosity (xenobiology, xenoarcheology).

      Any raw materials they could mine on earth are found in much larger quantities in the Oort cloud, much more readily accessible. They may want to harness solar energy, but no need to visit our planet for that.

      People/plants as food wouldn't make sense because digestive system probably won't handle our proteins (probably containing different amino acids than theirs). Heck, some people here can't even digest cheese, and no human can digest wood. Also, they would have to produce their own food anyway to survive the trip, so why not just continue doing that?

      As you said, their technology would be superior to ours, so no need to come for that either.

      Because of the light speed and distance issue, any aliens exploring the galaxy will probably be A.I. , since biological beings just wouldn't live long enough.

    5. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by burtosis · · Score: 1

      It's funny, humans possess something no other civilization does in the visible universe and its right under your nose - - our particular kind of life. Even if life started elsewhere, using the exact RNA precursor (or whichever came first) and a similar star and planet, the odds of it being the same as us here after 3 billion years is low enough that even if it started up once per solar system, it will have occurred no where else within visible reality. This natural technology can be quite valuable, as it would take one hell of an effort to reproduce all the diversity and tenaciousness of life as we see it today - and that's just one among what is likely a large number of life bearing star systems in just our galaxy alone. The first thing I'd expect aliens to do is scan every life form down to a cellular level and extract as much data about how our organisms work as is possible.

    6. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sorry but aliens were invented to convince dumb people to give smart scientists money. Let me explain. No life can exist without a sun, which is actually a star.

      This is just plain false. No life can exist without an energy source. So your first assumption is wrong.

      Light travels extremely fast, 186,287 miles per second, and according to special relativity we can never go the speed of light because it requires infinite energy.

      It doesn't say that it's not possible to travel faster than light, though. It only says that mass can't be accelerated to a speed that's faster than light. So your second assumption is false.

      So even if we could go a speed we can never go, it would take 4 years to get to the closest star.

      If you can't go a speed, what sense does it make to talk about it?

      But imagine for a second there is some being that has the technology to travel that fast, why in the hell would they waste hundreds or thousands of years to visit us? [...] there is nothing interesting about us at all compared to them.

      Art and food. Do I need to expound, or do you understand now?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's becoming increasingly possible to model potential developments in evolution, including paths that life could have taken. Current life on earth is just s snapshot of a particular outcome, so might not be that interesting.

    8. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of light years? There are very few stars that far away that are visible in a modern night sky, and those that are, say Deneb, are very different from our own sun.

    9. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by itchybrain · · Score: 1

      ... The closest star to us is about 4 light years away. That means it takes light 4 years to travel that distance.

      Surely, distance is no barrier for an alien with a long lifespan or with advance technology (e.g., stasis). There is no ETA for such a thing to occur, only that it may occur.

    10. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by dddux · · Score: 1

      How likely is that they would like a hamburger? Especially a McDonald's one? I'd say about 10%... and I think I'm being generous.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    11. Re:Aliens can't or won't visit us by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      While I generally agree, a couple points both for and against.

      #1: Fuel. Currently every conceivable method we have for propulsion requires some kind of fuel to be carried around with us. I believe even the ION drive require some sort of minute amount of fuel. I recall reading that using the most basic fuel source of Hydrogen, to reach some of the closest world, in order to get there in a reasonable amount of time, even with the considerations below, would require using an amount of Hydrogen equal to that contained within the Sun. Now consider also the impact of the extra mass and it's increased amount of inertia and all those types of factors. So even if we say in a thought experiment kind of way that we are somehow able to get up to a decent percentage of the speed of light, the practical applications of that in fuel usage and having to carry that fuel around with us, makes it even more daunting.
      #2: Speed. This one is pretty simple. Take whatever time you were thinking of in terms of the speed of light (or there abouts), and the distance to said planet.... Now more than double it. As unless you want to fly by said planet doing an incredible speed for little purpose you also have to slow down. That means at the midway point you have to stop accelerating, and start decelerating. So whatever time frames you were initially thinking about just got a lot longer, making a trip even more difficult.
      #3: Life. Unless you are going with self replicating/self repairing robots, most discussions involve slapping some humans into a ship of some kind. This means two things. First, your speed is going to be limited by what is reasonable to survive in acceleration and deceleration, which is further going to make the journey even longer. Second, when it comes down to it, unless you are talking about something akin to a generational type ship all of the above requirements would need to happen in a relatively short period of time given the normal human lifespan, with along with everything above is pretty hard to see happening.

      #4: Magic Technology. So given our current technological capabilities, it is pretty clear that anything remotely like a human going to another solar system is pretty remote to the point of impossibility. That said, if you looked at technology we had 1000 years ago to what we have now, it is a pretty stark difference. It is hard to tell what technologies might be available to us in say another 1000 years. Now we can talk about how perhaps many technologies are plateauing, or being limited by physics (or at least our current understating of it), but again it was only several hundred years ago where many thought the earth was flat or that the Sun rotated around the earth and all sorts of other things. People thought if you sailed too far you might fall off the edge of the Earth, etc... Who knows what we'll come up with. We could get some Wrinkle in Time, wormhole kind of thing, cryogenics, or many number of things that might address the assortment of problems.

      Some Problems with advancing technology:
      Two of my favorite issues with the advancements of technology to solves these problems come from two great works of science fiction (though in various forms exist in several).

      Red Button Issue: Slaughterhouse-Five. I won't go into all the details of the book, however the basic principle is that by the time a civilization discovers a technology that is powerful enough to basically address all the issues above of and the physics as we know it, it would have to be so powerful and so dangerous, that the first civilization that tries to develop it has a pretty good chance of destroying the entire universe/time/everything in the attempt. That essentially in testing such a device and pressing the "red button" basically breaks everything. The lesser version of this, is that on the way to that ultimate conclusion, they test a much less powerful version, and once the "red button" is pressed, ends up wiping our their own civilization meaning that civilization as a thing has a progression limit unt

  28. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Another possibility is that once we viruses sent in messages we receive by SETI.

    If the message tells you how to do something, the odds are that thing will be to send messages as efficiently as possible because messages like that would be more common than ones that helpfully sent the Encyclopedia Galactica.

    If I was writing Contact the machine the aliens sent the blueprint for would replicate to form a bunch of copies, disassembling the Earth/planets for materials in the process, and then surround the sun as a Dyson swarm and use all its energy output to send very powerful copies of the message to distant stars forever.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  29. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

    It will be all computers anyway. It's just a matter of time here and probably everywhere else too, and the computers won't care about the meat creatures.

  30. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by haruchai · · Score: 1

    "Another possibility is that once we viruses sent in messages we receive by SETI"

    ?? That's a somewhat awkwardly crafted sentence. What are you trying to say?

    I think you may be describing the plot of the Species movie franchise

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  31. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by haruchai · · Score: 0

    "You're not responsible by what your ancestors did and you have no impossible "historical debt" to pay"

    And it's perfectly OK to profit & prosper from their crimes.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  32. Use Weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cruising around Maia in the Pleiades the other night minding my own business when my ride was interdicted in hyperspace by Aliens who mysteriously shut down every system except some Christmas string lights strewn across the dash. Christmas decorations appear inexplicably to be completely immune to alien technology.

  33. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Sorry that should have been "Another possibility is viruses in messages we receive by SETI"

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  34. Illegal migrants by definition by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 0

    All undocumented migrants that arrive on our planet are unwelcome by definition. We should assume they are rapists and drug pushers, and deport them immediately.

    1. Re: Illegal migrants by definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All our base are belong to them! ALL our base!
      I for one... Welcome our new Alien overlords!
      Too long .... we have been the unknowing slaves of the illuminati!

    2. Re:Illegal migrants by definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can identify the rapists, murderers and drug pushers by the little american flag defaced with a blue and two black lines on it, or by their toothy penis tentacles. They are to be considered heavily armed and extremely dangerous. Flee-from or destroy them on sight - never allow them a chance to get close to your families.

    3. Re:Illegal migrants by definition by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Since anal probes are aliens #1 pastime, I'd say they are rapists!

      More seriously, I'm tired of people like you who use any opportunity possible to push their political agenda. Get a fucking life.

    4. Re:Illegal migrants by definition by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Sense of humor much? I'm tired of people like you who use any opportunity to twist every single thing into some kind of offensive, social justice warrior brigade, opportunity to push your own political agenda. Yeah, we have a life...mind your own, jackass.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  35. We have reasons to fear, but also reasons to ... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...rejoice!

    Why? Well, most have been mention in this thread, I'm going to summarize those I agree with:

    Fear factors:

    - Viruses and Bacteria unknown to us.
    - Increased demand for our resources (which btw, we're running out of, FAST!).
    - Unknown motives, why did they decide to take contact? This is usually either because of two things, curiosity and the need for new resources. The last one should worry us... A LOT!

    Good things:

    - New technology (they traveled this far, we didn't manage the opposite so chances are they're technically superior to us, and we can take part of this technology).
    - Combined technology, ours and theirs - are more likely to increase life quality for both species.
    - Introduction of new (possibly stronger) genes into our species.
    - Health technology, food growth technology, there could be infinite possibilities here, we don't know - yet!
    - A lot of bad things we dealt with on our planet, often "belief" based, can finally be laid to rest, maybe this will cause less stress and agony on our own species, we don't know the effects of this yet, but I'm one of those who think we could totally do without all religions.

    As far as I see it, the possibilities of the good outweighs the bad. I'm curious - I welcome the aliens, as long as their intentions are peaceful, for both species.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  36. Re:We have reasons to fear, but also reasons to .. by fabriciom · · Score: 1

    There is no rational way of not fearing alien life, what there must be is rational acceptance as to not create a problem out of the situation.

  37. Depends on how delicious they find us by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    Their speed isn't so much what's interesting, their appetite might be.

    1. Re:Depends on how delicious they find us by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And also in which form the aliens comes. If they are bacteria and viruses or if they are advanced life forms. Of course, advanced life forms may carry diseases too.

      The answer to question "are we alone" is scary whatever the answer is.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Depends on how delicious they find us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From an evolutionary point of view, being delicious can actually be a very good way to ensure your species continues on almost indefinitely.
      On the other hand, most sapients would probably not consider that living.

    3. Re:Depends on how delicious they find us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also in which form the aliens comes. If they are bacteria and viruses or if they are advanced life forms. Of course, advanced life forms may carry diseases too.

      Or they must have eradicated all forms of misery and violence before heading to the stars.

  38. Fear it by aepervius · · Score: 1

    With it would come huge disruption. Forget SF tropes about FTL drives and so forth. The most likely reason somebody would cross that huge divide, would be on generation ship and to colonize. Nuff said.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Fear it by mentil · · Score: 1

      If they live long enough, it wouldn't really be a 'generation ship'. If they were effectively immortal, the "everyone I love will be old/dead when I get back" angst wouldn't exist.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:Fear it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Forget SF tropes about FTL drives and so forth. The most likely reason somebody would cross that huge divide, would be on generation ship and to colonize. Nuff said.

      That's the likeliest (only?) reason to cross that huge divide without FTL. If you had FTL, though, it's not a huge divide any more, and then you might just do it to go sightseeing.

      AFAWK you can't go FTL, so worrying about aliens is a waste of time.

      If aliens show up, welcome them with open arms, because if they show up to kill us we can't do anything about it, but if they aren't then we want to be friendly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Fear it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So the logic is "welcome them, because we can't fight them anyway".

      Didn't work so great for the natives in the various continents we "discovered", did it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Fear it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Didn't work so great for the natives in the various continents we "discovered", did it?

      No, but some of them still exist which is more than we could hope for if we resisted aliens with the technology to cross the void between the stars. Diseases of the Spanish had already wiped out up to 90% of native Americans by the time we showed up to wipe out most of the rest of them, though. They really had no chance to mount a defense of the entire nation. If you take a dispassionate, game player's view of the situation, their only sensible move was to abandon most of it and move west of their own volition before they were forced. They might have held much of the west if they had come together over it. But then again, to speak of the Natives of this land as if they were one people is to miss the point completely; they weren't, so that wasn't a viable option. Sad, though, and it underscores the importance of cooperation among people with like interests.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re: Fear it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No change in attitude would have affected the outcome.

    6. Re: Fear it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about plain, old curiosity and exploration? I would think that a civilization that had become all-competent in its space would get awfully bored.

    7. Re: Fear it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The main motivation for the conquistadores was profit. You needn't win against someone with this motivation. You only have to make his endeavor unprofitable for him to abandon it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. One possible scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. FEAR! ABSOLUTE TOTAL DREAD!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    History teaches us exactly what will happen. They will come to rob us of our riches and resources. They will enslave us. After the long time they will be horny and bloodthirsty. We must fear and fight.

  41. I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #EnoughSaid

  42. Suspicious is what we should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're not hostile; maybe they're like the Enterprise crew and genuinely want to seek out new life and new civilizations (aliens: prepare to be disappointed!)

    Maybe they're no better than our own governments, intent on divesting us of our resources, our rights and our freedoms. In which case we should fight them to the last, and perhaps after all is said and done, if we somehow survive, remember them with a very slight amount of appreciation for most likely having slaughtered our former overlords while taking up their place.

    Maybe it'll turn out they're just hungry: If they're here to eat us, fear's a fairly reasonable thing to be feeling.

  43. Pointless study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect most of the people being asked about microbial life had no idea what was being asked. There's also a good chance 50% believe there is a massive government cover-up involving gray aliens.

  44. Temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the space alien women hot? That's surely an important criterion for determining whether to welcome them or not?

  45. Depends by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    On several things.

    First and foremost, did we encounter alien life HERE, or did we encounter it wherever it evolved.

    In the latter case, I'd welcome it. In the former, not so much.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  46. Of course they would... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People already freak out about aliens from Mexico. If the aliens came from a spaceship, people would get out their guns and try and shoot them.

  47. Mmmmmmm... by gtall · · Score: 1

    Green alien women!!! Oh the forbidden pleasure! I welcome them.

  48. You never know an alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until you have sex with it.

  49. Depends on whether they're like us by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If they are then we're fucked if we get visited.

    The more alien they are, the higher our chances for survival.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have any idea the irony in your post. It's mind boggling...

    (unless that's some next level trolling, in which case - nicely done!)

  51. Easy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would treat it like any other odd crap that comes my way. I'd rough it up, maybe break a teeth or two, shit on it and send it back where it came from.

  52. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by thesupraman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your father and/or your grandfather (depending on your age) had sex with your mother/grandmother in a society which almost by definition gave him a position of power to demand she obey him in such matters. Modern views would consider that non-consensual, and by definition rape.
    As you are the outcome of that crime (extend back further in history if you want to make it stronger) you are by definition profiting and prospering from what we now consider crimes.

    Or, alternatively, you could consider that perhaps, even though we may not currently agree with actions taken historically, as we had no influence over them, and as they were not crimes at the time, we do not in fact have a responsibility because of them.

    See how it works?

  53. But we're still pre-warp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zefram Cochrane, please make your flight, and then tell the Vulcans "That'll do, pig."

  54. Prion-based CRISPR-like virus by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    It will be like a prion disease such as (https://www.cdc.gov/prions/index.html), but utilized in a way that's similar to CRISPR gene editing (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609722/crispr-in-2018-coming-to-a-human-near-you/) except it'll rain from the sky during a meteor shower from the debris of an asteroid with a hyperbolic trajectory (https://www.space.com/38580-interstellar-object-spotted-comet-asteroid-mystery.html) or the worse case scenario is that it directly hits Earth and wipes us all out except for the prions to start this mess all over again. Even we earthlings can land probes on comets (http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta). Think of it as the alien equivalent of our golden records on Voyager 1 and 2 (https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/golden-record/) but with genetic information that says "this is what we are" by species mutation. However, the odds of us being genetically similar enough to be susceptible to their prion is hopefully unlikely. I've often wondered if Mad Cow and similar diseases are just an alien Voyager failure. We may have come close; notice how the cow is number 9 on this list (https://www.thedodo.com/animals-you-had-no-idea-were-so-closely-related-to-humans-1172946617.html). But for now, we can just monitor the fruit flies (https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2004/03feb_fruitfly) as an inadvertent, invasion "litmus paper." A prion "disease" has a better chance of surviving a long space journey than even the robotic invasion theory does. Besides, we humans are a base-10 species (https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-base-10-2312365), so they'll have have to be close enough and long enough to learn our mathematics (1-10, symbols, and axioms) to hack our systems anyway. And if AI develops further, it'll act as a temporary firewall and hopefully log enough to know flag an alert. At any rate, if it is robotic, and they figure and Google or Facebook, they'll know to attack Windows first followed by about 2.2 billion people on their shit-list. But, my money is on "random chance prion" because I doubt they use anything close to our file formats. The only reason we can "crack" any of them is because we know what patterns to look for, most of which would be uniquely human. The risk of long journey mechanical failure is too high anyway; it would be better and cheaper to drop genetic material on passing asteroids and let random chance do the work.

  55. They might have the One Book that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was the title again? To Serve Man ... andit is not a cookbook. YT link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oViVFm4wA1g

  56. Why should we welcome alien life forms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to be happy living on our little rock, tucked away in some remote location of our unremarkable galaxy, trying to solve all the myriad of problems we have created for ourselves, including but not limited to pollution, overpopulation, toxic religion, toxic politicians, psychopaths, romance novel writers, marriage, Facebook, Twitter, The Clintons, D. Trump, and rap "music". Perhaps if we broadcast non-stop rap "music", endless showings of "Judge Judy",
    and Nascar races, aliens will convince themselves there's no intelligence on the planet, hence no reason to investigate us. Unless they need us for food ...

  57. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If faster than light is real, then we should be cautious.

    It is not. So don't worry. Go back to your pitch fork.

  58. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you mean computer viruses?

    Even then I find it hard to believe a possibility. Knowing how to hack our computers never having worked with one... That's would be like asking a modern day hacker to hack the enigma machine without seeing it, knowing its specs, knowing how it works, and be able to do it remotely without the recipient knowing.

  59. what a WRONG assumption by jasko2007 · · Score: 1

    What a STUPID research !! You are so fucking WRONG !! People have always been ignorant of alien news because they have always been fake stories. So that people stop paying attention over time. But if and when we notice another spaceship in the universe that is not NASA, we WILL freak out !!! If ever they come to earth we will freak out !! We will freak out because we will not know what they know. We will freak out because the earth nations are so disunited. While some nations would want to establish friendly contact with aliens, others are about to shoot rockets at them. Yes, we WILL FREAK Out, trust me !!!!

  60. Re: Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Yes, it is absolutely perfectly ok to profit from the alleged 'crimes' of our ancestors. The 'crime' of coming from a technologically superior society and using that superiority to conquer our neighbors. As it had always been and it always shall be.

    I am not at all ashamed to be a member of a superior society.

    Are you a member of the inferior society? Get an education. Work harder. Stop fucking whining. Stop smoking weed. Get a job or do something useful for society. Enjoy the fruits of a superior society.

  61. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    A biological virus is a just instructions that say "copy me" to a cell.

    A computer virus is just instructions that say "copy me" to a computer.

    You can imagine something similar with message received by SETI. And actual a good message aimed at an extraterrestrial intelligence would need to be very target independent, unlike computer or biological viruses.

    E.g. the Arecibo message aims at conveying a fair bit of information to any civilisation which picks it up -

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Now if you can explain concepts like "we're carbon based life from the third planet in the system. There are about 4 billion of us and also about 4 billion base pairs in our genome which is stored in DNA" with a couple of k of bits it's not out of the question to teach them how to build something with a few million bits. And from there it's not that hard to explain how to build something to copy the message. So messages to unknown civilisations are already target independent.

    Maybe a benign civilisation sent out a non viral message designed to get other civilisations communicating and it mutated into a viral one. Or maybe a paranoid civilisation created a viral message to nuke any competition.

    So it's a virus, but it's not a computer virus.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  62. Just ask Aborigonee or Native American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll either be Vikings who rape, murder, take then leave with slaves

      or "Settlers" who rape, murder, take, then stay and enslave, and converted to Scientology or killed.

    1. Re:Just ask Aborigonee or Native American by PPH · · Score: 1
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  63. Naive bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think an "extinguish all other intelligent life" rule is unlikely if for no other reason than they really don't want that rule to be in effect if they encounter a superior civilization.'

    Riiiiiiight, because the universe is like a giant playground where all species have to play by the same rules. Because ya know like if they're nice to us and aren't playground bullies then the kids in the next grade up aren't allowed to bully them either because teacher said so!

    Where do people get these whacky ideas? My 9 year old understands life better than you do. She's not special. She's not an ubergenius. She's a little girl who simply understands life and understands playground rules better than you do: bigger kids beat up littler kids.

  64. Welcome Alien Overlords! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love Aliens. Honestly. Stuffed. One on either side of the fireplace.

    Do they go well with sauce? (I prefer BBQ)

  65. Depends.. by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    on whether they have tentacles or not.

    1. Re:Depends.. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      The Japanese might welcome them.

  66. What if we're the first? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Flipping the question around, what if we are the first sentient species in the universe? What if the next one isn't likely to come around for billions or even trillions of years? If it were possible, somehow, for us to know this, what would that mean,,or what should that mean for us, as a species?

    1. Re:What if we're the first? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      The only thing that would noticeably change is an insufferable loud and long-term reaction from all the religious nutjobs claiming that it definitely proves the existence of God and that he made us, and that any/all evolution is necessarily false.

    2. Re:What if we're the first? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... there'd be that. I was more wondering what the reaction from the more rationally-minded community would be.

      Such a thing would hardly prove the existence of God even if God *did* exist, because God is not necessarily a part of creation, and you can't use X to prove Y when Y is not inside of the domain of X in the first place.

    3. Re:What if we're the first? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> Such a thing would hardly prove the existence of God

      True but good luck trying to use reasoning and logic-based argument with people that believe sky fairies are the answer to everything.

  67. Rocket scientist here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Travel between stars is very hard, but not impossible.
    If you run the numbers, solar sails should be able to get to .1c speeds when combined with laser thrusters.
    https://www.space.com/9051-sol...
    These technologies change the problem from 2,000 yrs to 120 yrs.
    Still not easy, but not impossible.
    I've seen plans for micro-spacecraft going to Promima in 20 yrs, but that isn't very useful to me.

  68. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Humbubba · · Score: 1

    You are right - It depends on how bent they've made reality. Aliens are famous for their Sadomasochistic, 50 shades of sexual experiments, but the #MeToo Movement has made dating so complicated these days.

  69. Irrelevant Study by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    Arizona State Psychology Professor conducted a study and determined that "people" are more likely to welcome Aliens than shoot at them. Some facts:

    1. The students that participated in his study, nor the commentary from past articles are representative of "people" as a whole.
    2. Younger people have less fear of death than older people.
    3. *NO ONE* that he conducted a study on is remotely representative of the governments of the world that have the resources and authority to initiate a meeting with Aliens if we made contact.

    Now if he were to have conducted a study on military officials from governments around the world - you know, the guys with the guns - and concluded that those in power were more likely to greet aliens in a friendly manner...that would be interesting.

    This is useless.

  70. The Japanese did not want to conquer the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They wanted sufficient resources to be considered a Great Power.

    The 1920s and 1930s were a "Fascist moment" where the concepts of autarky and totalitarian rule seemed to be the only, and superior alternative to Communism. Some Japanese wanted this, some didn't. Try Toland's "The Rising Sun" for some background on the difficulties in Japanese politics of the time.

    People conflate unique features of Japanese culture with the essential, very Western political battle going on in Tokyo.

  71. Re:We have reasons to fear, but also reasons to .. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    I was going to argue against this, but as I think about it, I think you're right about having to fear it. I don't think that there will be rational acceptance of it. And I think there will be lots of problems.

    90% of the natives of the Americas died of disease in the century after first contact with Europeans. And while Europeans got syphilis in return, that pales in comparison to all of the plagues and poxes they brought to the continent.

    When Darwin sailed around the world and cataloged all the species, he ate all of them as well.

    When colonists show up anywhere, they bring their favorite native flora and fauna with them, even if its microbial. This almost always radically disrupts the ecosystem that is in place.

    Imagine if alien life turns out to aggressively feed on plastic? Imagine if we bring fungus to a cellulose based alien world?

    If alien life comes to us, we have all of that to fear. And if we come to them, likewise. And if they are advanced, they may want to make earth life harmless to them. And who can guess what that would mean?

    But regardless of this, the major religions of the world will need to be updated based on the new knowledge, or they will need to fight tooth and nail to deny and discredit it. And I wouldn't be surprised if some new ones or splinters of old ones suddenly spring into being as people try to make sense of this new view of the universe.

    That will cause a lot of social friction, and may well be bloody in parts of the world.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  72. Where by meglon · · Score: 1

    If we find alien life existing around another star 50ly from us (through messaging, or even just chemical signatures), i imagine few people would be overwhelmed by that. on the other hand, if we discover alien life because we wake up one morning to hundreds of 100 mile long spaceships with a full invasion going on, i'm expecting people would probably freak out... at least a little. It's all about context.

    The LGM's (little green men) we don't have to worry about, it's the LGM's (large green motherfuckers) we do.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  73. I, For One, Am Commenting on the Actual Article by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    I know, this is /. where actually reading the summary, or the secondary source used to goose clicks, or the original article is a faux pas. But responding to what the researcher actually said/did - it is a fairly underwhelming conclusion: "Taken together, this work suggests that our reactions to a future confirmed discovery of microbial extraterrestrial life are likely to be fairly positive." hyped by silly references to B-movies.

    I have yet to see any movie, or popular fiction, where the discover of non-Earth originating microbes of the non-brain-eating kind leads to mass panic, nor could I see how such a thing could be plausibly proposed. All of the "panic mode" scenarios involve intelligent alien life who are actually contacting us directly, or an alien plague (which is scary like any deadly plague, but from space).

    These two types of scenarios, other than involving in some way "alien life", are unrelated.

    A tip off about why the "alien microbe" scenario is not a cause for concern for most people is this other bit in one of the studies reported on: "...responses to reading an actual announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life showed a greater positivity bias than responses to reading an actual announcement of the creation of man-made synthetic life..".

    Now that makes a whole lot of sense. It we start making synthetic life here on Earth the possibilities of an eventual harmful result are pretty obvious, and should be cause for concern. The simulated science report of the discovery of "extraterrestrial bugs" (if plausibly written) would not threaten any possible harmful consequence. If you had people read a report that we have discovered the "Andromeda Strain" that will kill us all, expect a different response.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  74. best case worst case by Coolfish · · Score: 1

    Let's think this through.

    If it's just other life - microbial - this might come as a surprise to some, but honestly, the universe is so big, it's bound to happen. What's it mean for us in the long run? Eh, does it really matter? It'll mean that the next step is more likely, but given the odds already ...

    Technological life - eg life that has altered its planet's atmosphere enough that we can detect it using standard astrophysics. Well, this is interesting, but unless we can contact them, it doesn't mean much.

    Technological life that can communicate with us - This becomes more interesting, for obvious reasons. Is it bound by the rules of physics we know now? Or, like in *Contact*, can the aliens actually communicate instantaneously (in contact, via Einstein-Rosen bridge, wormholes, which are theoretically possible now, but the science is far from settled. I mean, GR still has closed timelike curves possible, and I doubt a unified theory would allow such paradoxes to exist).

    If they can communicate with us, it's a question of how long/how fast. Current physics, or will a unified field theory allow something faster, say something *instant*? How does that change the game?

    Worst case - their intentions are bad. Or they have good intentions, and don't know how to establish contact without risking a huge fuck up. Game over for Earth, and really, there's nothing we could do about it, could we.

    Best case. They know *exactly* what they are doing, their intentions are not only good - minimize harm and suffering, maximize freedom and happiness - but they know *exactly* how to pull it off. What does this look like? What would it truly mean to have the best case for first contact? Contact hints at this - small steps, and the ultimate question is "how? How did you manage to survive?"

    Turns out if you run this in your head logically, the answer pops right the fuck out, and I suggest you do that now, then we can compare notes.

  75. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes

  76. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's equally bad if they haven't. Any species capable of accelerating significant masses to relativistic speeds are species capable of making all our military equipment entirely pointless overnight.

    There's no reason to assume they'd be hostile, though. Not that it matters, the cultural exchange will, in short order, make at least us and possibly them unrecognizable in decades.

  77. Re: We have reasons to fear, but also reasons to . by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    A lot of bad things we dealt with on our planet, often "belief" based, can finally be laid to rest ...

    I don't know. We still have Flat Earthers trying to launch rockets to prove the Earth is flat or at least enough of them to fund a guy to do it.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  78. Surveys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did Slashdot start allowing obvious surveys from real aliens to be posted??

  79. I'd sneeze on it. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    Or make sure my one year old sneezed on it.

  80. Stop promoting failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In every case where an advanced civilization has encountered a much less advanced civilization, it hasn't worked out well for the less advanced civilization. Ask Native Americans if they think that the arrival of Europeans was good for their culture.

    There's nothing about Native American culture that is worth saving. Nothing.

    Stop encouraging Native Americans to wallow in their dysfunctional, obsolete culture(s.) Support terminating the reservation system to force them out of their cycle of self-indulgent poverty and misery. It's long past time.

  81. Fuck off spaceniggers, we're full! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can crash on the moon if you want.

  82. Both by HiThere · · Score: 1

    You did say "Alien Life", not advanced technology alien visitors.

    If they were "advanced technology alien visitors", then given no more information than that they exist, I'd probably be more fearful than welcoming. If you want to know why you could ask the Aztecs. (OTOH, the neighboring tribes that weren't Aztecs *might* have a different opinion.) Or you could ask the native Hawaiians.

    Now these analogies aren't exact, but they are legitimate causes for trepidation.

    OTOH, they might help us get safely through the construction of super-human AI. That looks to me like a major bottleneck ahead of us, and is likely a part of the "great filter". As is, of course, not developing a super-human AI. Out current governments are in the long term suicidal.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  83. That depends on the aliens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...I vould velcome the Vulcans and fear the Klingons and Romulans.

  84. Does ET have a Twitter account? by epine · · Score: 1

    Does ET qualify for a Twitter account? If so, then I fear ET.

    Even if the Green Borg is very far away and merely Tweeting over FTL subspace using his handy hive-mind Ansible client, that's clear and persistent danger, sure enough.

    Even a fusty Mormon Morkman from Gorkmon space-scroll that's jitterbugged the Feynman shuffle through not-so-empty space for 3000 years bearding the Mesonic Moses' Galactic n Commandments (one for every pudgy finger, floppy tentacle, and buoyant teat, slyly encoded in the serpentine outer margins of a phat, foldable primer) could really stir up the shit here on the bare-back believer blue bulboid.

    ———

    Mesonic: of or pertaining to a meson.

    That's so gosh darn elementary, it wasn't even in the primer.

    ———

    Daydream Believer

    The version that's stuck in my head is the Anne Murray version, which I must have heard on the ride into school every second day for three years running, alternating with The Devil Went Down to Georgia which concluded (in the bleary-eyed airplay version of my sheltered youth) with the line:

    Cause I told you once, you son of a gun, I'm the best that's ever been.

    Either Johnny slacked a bit in late middle-age, or the Devil really hit the bottom of the bottle ("Since they went into Trance, I have been in continual practice. I shall win at the odds."), but it presently seems clear enough that the long-touted rematch didn't go nearly so well for the Deep South, who now worship at the alter of a Quack from Queens. (Talk about selling your soul #BigTime.)

    Annually, I asked my Dad why he played that station, and he always told me it was because he liked the news guy. Could even be true. I've never witnessed him seek out a country song since.

    ———

    If Kurzweil ever does discover life extension, or ET tips his hand (would you be first in line?) , someday in the distant future I'll set aside some dull morning to rewrite the lyrics of Daydream Believer around the updated-for-social-media phrase "bareback believer".

    As for Anne Murray's delivery, I wouldn't change a thing. It fits like a milky glove.

    ———

    God damn the bareback believers. We're but one subtly psychopathic signal away from a collective skid, gospel of Mark.

  85. s/bearding/bearing by epine · · Score: 1

    Not intended.

    I have no idea how that d got in there.

    Moses must have burst his visual category. Word play requires lowering your mind to a very low lateral activation energy, and then this kind of thing happens, but that's a lot weirder than most.

  86. It Is The Duty Of Every Human by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    To seek out alien life and fuck it until it stops squirming.

  87. Faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how otherwise intelligent people believe in intelligent life on other planets, despite any evidence at all. It is basically a faith/religious belief at this point. Saying they must exist because the universe is so big is about as scientific as saying God exists because it is self-evident.

  88. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you fear or welcome what doesn't exist.

  89. that's not how odds work by c6gunner · · Score: 2

    With this in mind, there's really only 4 possible scenarios: reconnaissance, plunder, destruction, or assistance. So there's a 2/4 chance our race is fucked, a 1/4 chance that we don't notice anything at all, and a 1/4 chance of becoming a thriving interstellar civilization.

    If you get behind the wheel of your car, there are really only 6 possible scenarios:

    1. You crash into a tree and die.
    2. You crash into a car and die.
    3. You crash into a truck and die.
    4. You crash into a wall and die.
    5. You crash into a pedestrian and badly damage your car.
    6. You make it home safe.

    So there's a 5/6 chance that you're fucked, and only a 1/6 chance of a happy outcome.

    1. Re:that's not how odds work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to think more creatively, like this guy who parked on his neighbor's roof.

  90. Our Technology, and our resources are irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A civilization with a technology that allows for FTL travel ( not necessary by exceeding speed of light) wouldnâ(TM)t have a problem with resources since they are plenty everywhere in universe. They wouldnâ(TM)t think Earth as a resource worth that much.

    The only thing they would be interested in is our species from sociological point of view. For that so Expect a flood of their historians, folklorists, and scholars coming to every urban and rural areas.

  91. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The millenials won't believe this, but there were even paper viruses. "Chain letters" was the usual term.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  92. hope by originalGMC · · Score: 1

    my hope is that the assholes on earth don't shoot them or exploit them once we find them. My fears for for the safety of the aliens.

  93. Alien Life? Is Ripley in that one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it has Sigorney Weaver playing Ripley then I welcome it.

  94. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Arguably religions are viruses of the mind. When they infect you they tell you to proselytize, i.e. infect other people.

    Of course like biological viruses are not equally lethal, religions are not equally bad for you. In fact some resemble cowpox, and some resemble smallpox.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  95. How about a third emotional option? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Kill it with fire.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  96. Re:The Japanese did not want to conquer the Univer by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Actually the Visitors in V - the original one not the horrid remake - are more or less a 30's expansionist fascist dictatorship IN SPACE

    "Once we've got starships we need a first strike on those mammalian bastards from Earth in order to expand the glory of the empire. The Leader demands it!

    Also we're going to eat them after we've won, because we're complete and utter bastards"

    I loved that shit when I was a kid.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  97. Re:Depends on faster-than-light by Bengie · · Score: 1

    Based on currently measured measure of error of flatness of the Universe, the Universe is at-least 250x times larger in radius than the Observable Universe, making the Universe at least 60,000x more volumetric than what we can see. That the minimum. We're guessing the Universe is actually perfectly flat, making it infinitely large. If there was FTL transportation, then a potentially infinite number of aliens civilizations, would have the ability to get to us.

    Killing another species is easy for any space faring civilization. The technology required to spread through a solar system is barely less than the technology required to create a death-ray reflector around the host star that could destroy life nearly every line-of-sight star system in the host galaxy in only thousands of years. Why leave home?

    Resources should never be a reason for aliens to attack. The simplest setup is a Dyson swam of habitats around the host star, and all of the resources needed are siphoned from the star. Pretty much unlimited energy and resources, and impossible for a natural disaster that could wipe out the society. This is probably the best way to fill the Universe. From star to star, setting up trillions of habitats, each capable of supporting millions of humans for hundreds of thousands of years without refueling or new resources, and a near limitless supply of fuel and resources next door.

    This is all possible with current technology("just" an issue of scale... heh), we just need vastly more energy and resources, which will take time and a concerted effort. The current recommend way is to start building a Dyson swarm of energy collectors by strip mining Mercury. It's not only close to the Sun, but it has less mass, making it easier to get the swarm off of the planet. And boy do we mean "strip mine the planet". Literally destroying the planet. After some point, we'll have enough energy from the swarm to generate magnetic fields that could form the plasma atmosphere of the Sun in a way that allows us to extract materials. Once we hit this point, access to energy and resources will explode.

  98. Re:We have reasons to fear, but also reasons to .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if they bring their own beliefs. Would you accept/adopt them or would you try to convert them to your own beliefs?

  99. Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they nice aliens or mean aliens?

  100. Re: Depends on faster-than-light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think itâ(TM)s a reference to Independence Day.

  101. Desensitisation finally succeeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only took 50 years but hey!

  102. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "Americans can not even deal with brown skin"

    No, you, sir, can not even deal with Americans that are unconcerned with skin color.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  103. Re:Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "And it's perfectly OK to profit & prosper from their crimes."

    So, how do we deal with the slavers in Africa, both then and now?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  104. Like everything else in life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust but verify. Be polite, but have a plan to kill every ET you meet.

  105. Re:The Japanese did not want to conquer the Univer by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    People conflate unique features of Japanese culture with the essential, very Western political battle going on in Tokyo.

    While this is true, the authoritarian rule of Japan was well underway long before even the 20th century, and had won long before the 20's or 30's.

  106. the thing to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and some sci fi has explored, is what will the *instinctual* reaction to truly alien life be? Could it manifest as a species-wide arachnophobia, or worse?

    Or will the aliens have that reaction? Only takes one side to start something nasty.

    Or what if all our vaunted back-patting of "how we will communicate" is still so human-centric that we truly cannot communicate with them or find a common ground? Hive minds that do not see individuals as anything more than cells, mental structures that "reason" in completely different ways, etc?

  107. Re: Americans can't even deal with brown skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am not at all ashamed to be a member of a superior society"

    England was the superior society that your ancestors ( presuming you're American) chose to revolt against and co-opted elements of the societies of northeastern Indian tribes