Slashdot Mirror


Nokia, Vodafone To Bring 4G To the Moon (reuters.com)

According to Reuters, the moon will get its first mobile phone network next year, enabling high-definition streaming from the landscape back to earth. "Vodafone Germany, network equipment maker Nokia and carmaker Audi said on Tuesday they were working together to support the mission, 50 years after the first NASA astronauts walked on the moon." From the report: Vodafone said it had appointed Nokia as its technology partner to develop a space-grade network which would be a small piece of hardware weighing less than a bag of sugar. The companies are working with Berlin-based company PTScientists on the project, with a launch scheduled in 2019 from Cape Canaveral on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, Vodafone said. One executive involved said the decision to build a 4G network rather than a state-of-the-art 5G network was taken because the next generation networks remain in the testing and trial stage and are not stable enough to ensure they would work from the lunar surface.

80 comments

  1. I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 4, Funny

    But the moon gets a new cell tower?

    1. Re: I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by rnmartinez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Donâ(TM)t worry - roaming charges are going to be a bitch

    2. Re:I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      But the moon gets a new cell tower?

      Damn your cell phone reception luck, but it seems likely on the order of the President tweeting something embarrassing that your cost of living, cable TV options, and internet speed are superior to the average lunar resident, now, and for the foreseeable future.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      But the moon gets a new cell tower?

      You do probably have free (no extra charge) calling at home over WIFI though. check your plan/phone.

      They used to give away pretty nice routers for free to people with issues at their homes. Don't know if they still do.

    4. Re: I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by blackpig · · Score: 1

      My phone plan includes $5 per day unlimited roaming wherever there is a Vodaphone network, so I'm set :-)

    5. Re: I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      weighing less than a bag of sugar

      And a new unit of measurement...

    6. Re:I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      If you move out of the basement your reception will improve. And not just your cell reception.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re: I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by gnick · · Score: 1

      Thank you. It would have been more useful to say, "weighing less than a 5 lb bag of sugar" or "a 20 lb bag of sugar", but then why do we need the sugar? Google's top hits tell me that a bag of sugar "weighs" 1 kg, but I don't think that's common for bags of sugar sold in the US or on the moon. Is the moon on metric?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    8. Re: I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t worry - roaming charges are going to be a bitch

      Roaming charges are going to be astronomical (pun intended)

    9. Re:I barely have t-mobile coverage at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a Cell Hole.
      Verizon activated wifi calling.
      I have excellent wifi
      It's a whole new world.

  2. Bag of sugar by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Love these new units. They leave no room for ambiguity.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Bag of sugar by quenda · · Score: 2

      Don't be silly. They clearly mean these bags: http://www.ismgroup.biz/images...

  3. The USA by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    walks on the moon and talks of God.
    Germany puts it brands on the moon and talks of the optics of branding.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The USA by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. That is probably the greatest quote ever made.

    2. Re:The USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that was really true, how come you can't even say it right? A man.

    3. Re:The USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one small step for man, one giant leap for A-man!

  4. Vodaphone? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I guess Verizon won't have the most coverage any more.

  5. At last... by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    ET can finally phone home.

  6. Great .. So I have to move to the moon by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

    Here I am living 5 miles from Vodafone's global headquarters and I can't get any reception from them, but oh.. the moon gets 4G .. great.. thanks!

  7. Houston, Can you hear me now? over. by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Good..over.

  8. Units! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be a small piece of hardware weighing less than a bag of sugar

    I don't understand. What is that in Libraries of Congress?

  9. Why? by GrahamJ · · Score: 1

    It’s hard to believe this isn’t an Onion link.

    Why do this?

    1. Re:Why? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Why do this?

      Probably the same reason we have an electric sports car on a collision course with Mars.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Why? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry they missed when aiming the sports car at Mars, it's headed for the asteroid belt instead.

      That said, "why" is a valid question, and one which seems somewhat lacking in the talk here.

      I'm assuming it's just some sort of PR stunt, but is there some practical reason I'm overlooking?

    3. Re: Why? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      They weren't aiming at Mars; they would have never gotten authorisation to actually launch a car at a planet which it could potentially contaminate. The planned orbit was always going to avoid Mars. However they DID overshoot their target aphelion so the roadster will end up going further out into the solar system than intended.

    4. Re: Why? by green1 · · Score: 1

      A little pedantic I see. "at" was not intended to mean a crash course. It was meant to indicate it would visit Mars proximity, something it will no longer do because they missed.

    5. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missing isn't what I'd call deciding to extend the burn to see how far out they could push it, thus changing the original orbit.

    6. Re: Why? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Now we're getting in to revisionist history.

      I missed my target? No, I MEANT to do that... honest!

    7. Re: Why? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      A little pedantic I see. "at" was not intended to mean a crash course. It was meant to indicate it would visit Mars proximity, something it will no longer do because they missed.

      I'm not psychic, so I can't possibly know what you intended to indicate. If someone says "I'm being shot at" I assume he means that an assailant is intending to hit him with a bullet. I don't assume that he means some random individual is firing a bullet towards his general vicinity, but intending to miss.

  10. Vaporware, likely hoax by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This looks like a ploy to generate investment money for PTScientists, a company that claims to have developed a spacecraft capable of delivering two rovers, or up to 100 kg of payload, to the lunar surface. No mention of a rocket, rocket tests or any aerospace industry activity at all, except for designing two rovers, probably in their basement.

    1. Re:Vaporware, likely hoax by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      It isn't fake. They even have another website http://mission-to-the-moon.com.... Plus they have a newsletter you can sign up for and everything.

  11. Less than a bag of sugar? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

    A 5lb bag, a 10lb bag, or a 25lb bag?

    (A 2K bag, a 4K bag, or 10K bag for most of the world.)

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    1. Re:Less than a bag of sugar? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Leaves them some wiggle room. When it inevitably comes out much larger than expected, they only need to manufacture a bag of sugar that's slightly larger and they'll be completely accurate in their description.

      Back to reality. Who comes up with these ridiculous measurements???? I have 2 completely different size bags of sugar in my kitchen right now, my parents always buy a 3rd size that's 4 times the size of the larger of the 2 I have right now, and I bet most bakeries get even larger bags. I've mocked things in the past that are described as the size of a toaster or a volkswagen, etc, but I don't think I've ever seen a comparison with quite as much variability as this one!

    2. Re: Less than a bag of sugar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are actually packets in Europe and are retail. A bag (which is somewhat not a retail item but a wholesale measure, e.g. bakeries would buy them, not households) is either 50kg, 80kg or 100kg and I think Iâ(TM)ve seen 250kg bags once. But in most peopleâ(TM)s mind a bag is 50kg.

    3. Re:Less than a bag of sugar? by bug1 · · Score: 1

      How do i convert bags of sugar to tomatoes, how much does it weigh in tomatoes ?

      I can see an opportunity for someone to whip up a quick webpage to convert between the weight of all sorts of grocery types...

    4. Re:Less than a bag of sugar? by Megane · · Score: 2

      And they say it weighs less than a bag of sugar, but where is the bag of sugar? Will it weigh less on the Moon than a bag of sugar weighs on Earth?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Less than a bag of sugar? by Toutatis · · Score: 1

      Will it weigh less on the Moon than a bag of sugar weighs on Earth?

      1 kg of sugar will weigh 167 g on the Moon, but the same will happen with the weigh of a "small piece of hardware".

    6. Re:Less than a bag of sugar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they have even bigger bags at the sugar factory.

    7. Re:Less than a bag of sugar? by quenda · · Score: 1

      (A 2K bag, a 4K bag, or 10K bag for most of the world.)

      Most of the world buys sugar in 1kg bags. Only American households buy 25lb sacks from Costco, along with the 44 gallon drum of HFCS.

    8. Re: Less than a bag of sugar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mad your govt banned HFCS? Land of the free baby. Come on over, the waters warm.

  12. Who you gonna call? by aliquis · · Score: 1

    - Who you gonna call?

    That's the question.

    1. Re:Who you gonna call? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      - Who you gonna call?

      Not only that but assuming the call goes through then who isn't going to hang up once the call goes through and there's 10 seconds of silence because of the round trip delay from the distance.

      I'll listen to phone interviews on podcasts and getting people to have a conversation with even the minimal delay from a coast to coast call can be frustrating. There's a reason the astronauts that went to the moon had those end of transmission beeps, keep saying "over", and so on. This is a verbal protocol to deal with the delay. I suspect that they also used a single channel for up link and down link which required this protocol. I assume a phone would not be limited like this, which could actually make this worse.

      Oh, and "Ghostbusters!"

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Who you gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enabling high-definition streaming

      Since you seemed to have missed the very first line in the summary...
      This isn't for making phonecalls.

    3. Re:Who you gonna call? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      - Who you gonna call?

      The Chinese and the Indians who will soon be there exploring the Moon.

      Oh, Russian hackers will be there, as well . . . fixing the election for the nude Moon folks:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Who you gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The transmission beeps during lunar communications weren't meant for the people. It was a simple in-band collision avoidance mechanism for the comms equipment. Look up Quindar tones. The system was basically like a walkie-talkie - ground control could transmit, or the spacecraft could transmit, but not both at the same time. The beeps were a way for the comms equipment on one end to signal the other end that it was about to transmit, so the equipment on the other end could lock out transmission capability until the conclusion tone was transmitted.

      It had nothing to do with dealing with delay. In fact, the delay to the moon is only about 1.5 seconds. The delay you often see and hear on TV and radio has to do with stacking of various delays in the processing equipment used to process the signal. Round-trip delay to a satellite in geosync orbit is only 1/3 of a second or so. Your basic coast-to-coast phone call only has a delay of 0.1 seconds or less, which should be undetectable.

    5. Re:Who you gonna call? by MaxiCat_42 · · Score: 1

      Most likely, the Indians will just set up a call centre to pester astronauts.

      Phil.

  13. Donald Trump wants a cell tower on the dark side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Don called. You know he's big on equal rights for everyone. He said "and the little green men are going to pay for it.

    Kelly tried to tell him there isn't a dark side – the far side is lit half the time. and there aren't any little green men. Donald wasn't having any of that though. Then he started rambling about how it'll be the best, the biggest. Yuge.

  14. Should've invested by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Every time a cryptocoin goes to the moon, I always miss out. What is this 4G coin, anyway?

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  15. Re:Moscow Donald brings TREASON to the White House by jfdavis668 · · Score: 0

    Treason can only be committed during times of war. Unless we have secretly declared war on Russia, there can be no treason.

  16. Have they considered Rural American Areas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if they would work towards covering places where people currently live rather than places where people currently won't be for another decade.

  17. Radio Pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please stop this nonsense

    Our planet earth have been so polluted by all kinds of man-made radio-noises that astrologists had to go somewhere really remote (like in a middle of a desert or high up in a remote mountain) in order to take credible readings on radio-frequencies beaming from outside planet earth

    Now that the far side of the moon is still 'prestine', void of the tons of man-made radio noises, it would still be the perfect location to gather radio wave data from distant galaxies

    With the 'bags of sugar' size 'radio transporters' the moon's radio silence may soon be a thing of the past

    1. Re:Radio Pollution by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Please stop this nonsense

      Our planet earth have been so polluted by all kinds of man-made radio-noises that astrologists had to go somewhere really remote...

      When you made this comment, was the Moon in the house of Libra with Mars rising?

  18. WALL-E by VanessaE · · Score: 1

    I am reminded of a scene from WALL-E, as the ship he's holding onto flies past the moon, an electronic billboard light up, advertising the imminent arrival of a shopping mall, or something of that nature.

    We haven't been to the moon in decades, and now these guys wanna stick a bunch of commercial cell data relay stations up there? What's the matter, simple radio isn't good enough for the moon, but it's good enough for a satellite that's somewhere out past Pluto?

  19. 4G by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Does that mean ping times are less than a second?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  20. How many bars does a 4G phone get on the moon? by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

    There has got to be a joke in there somewhere. Or up there, or wherever...

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:How many bars does a 4G phone get on the moon? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Someone got the current date on a Nokia phone: Apr 1, 2018.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  21. What's the country code? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    OK, this is merely a publicity stunt. But if Musk is planning to populate Mars, we need to start thinking about this sort of thing.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:What's the country code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we populate Mars, do you think we'd use the same archaic telephone system we have on Earth? What would be the point.

  22. When I read the headline... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...I expected that they were going to launch a Nokia smartphone in the space, just like Musk did with his car.

  23. A space-grade bag of sugar :] by najajomo · · Score: 1

    "a space-grade network which would be a small piece of hardware weighing less than a bag of sugar."

    It's for incisive technological analysis such as the about that I come to slashdot.

  24. Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about getting your earth bound customer systems working first?

    If only Vodafone would put some of the effort they expend on stunts like this -- or better still a fraction of the effort they spend on tax dodging -- into their customer records keeping, complaints handling and service functions they may end up with a different reputation to the one they have now.

    Vodafone is on my "back of the queue, never deal with again" list having incorrectly billed for thousands of pounds (twice), "fixed" the error, billed again, threatened bailiffs and repeated the fiasco again months after I'd left them.

    Yet, they can afford stunts like this whilst not being able to check their databases and CRM systems for duplicate entries.

  25. Long range network by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Scratch past the PR stunt, name droping, etc.

    Eventually, as more missions on the moon happens, you'll have more data to send from the probes on the moon back to earth.
    It doesn't make sense economically to build every single last device with a high gain radio equipment able to beam it's own data directly to earth.

    You'll eventually need an infrastructure of (relatively) high speed, high bandwidth local network (to communicate between the various probes/robots/landers/base station), and relays that uplink them to earth.

    What are you going to do :

      - Completely re-invent something from the ground up for the specific need of the mission ?
    (which actually is a valid strategy : that's the current situation on Mars with probe using sattelite relays)

      - Try to see if you can deploy easly availble and widely tested already existing solution ?
    (which is the idea behind this project)
    Of course, as the whole purpose of this type of solution is to use cheap of-the-shelf elements, you're going to ask some current big players in the field to help deploy the current-day solution. And of course, the big players will seize the solution to spin it as publicity.

    ---

    Also, the Nokia 3310 is probably orbital-reentry-proof, and thus naturally the solution picked up by NASA as a Space-modem. :-P

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Long range network by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      - Completely re-invent something from the ground up for the specific need of the mission ?

      (which actually is a valid strategy : that's the current situation on Mars with probe using sattelite relays)

      Well, sort of. They've known they have data issues and have been working on solutions since around 2005 (to my memory ; quite likely earlier). For several years NASA (possibly via JPL, CalTech or somesuch intermediary) were funding Vint Cerf to work up proposals for modifying the packet switching techniques used in TCP & IP to handle the greater (and very variable time of flight latency issues between nodes, the re-transmission requests, what to do about reassembling packets at intermediate nodes ... a number of issues. One version has been successfully working relaying data between surface devices (Spirit, Pathfinder, Opportunity ...) and orbital devices (Mars Reconnaisence Orbiter, Mars Express) then from the orbiter to Earth. That still leaves certain periods (opposition, when the Sun is between Earth and Mars) when communications are unreliable, but there are far fewer times when you can't get a signal from Earth to the surface of Mars and back.

      The next step would be to put additional relays in Earth-trojan (or maybe Venus-trojan, for the solar power) orbits so that opposition problems are reduced further. What the schedule on that is, I don't know. But after that, essentially any point in the solar system could be predictable linked to Earth through 3 hops ("regions" in IPN terminology). You'd still have time of flight issues, but they're the law, and they seem to be manageable.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  26. In a related news... by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    ...Samsung announced that it will enter in partnership with Nokia and Vodafone to bring 4G connectivity to the Moon. Samsung will develop a new fuel and ignition system for space rockets, thanks to the experience gained with the Samsung Galaxy project.

  27. At long last! by sad_ · · Score: 1

    Finally, what took them so long?!
    No wonder we humans haven't gone back to the moon yet...

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  28. Nokia,Vodafon not to bring kawaii4 G To Antartica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of the Moon, they should do something about the Antartica still not having stable, high-speed voice / video / digital data access. We want the Yorimoi girl quartet to continue streaming even after they have disembarked from the icebreaker!

  29. Finally! That's what I've been waiting for. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    The lack of coverage was a real deal-breaker. Now I can go without missing out on my daily /.

  30. People on the planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... back to earth.

    Is there a ring of communication satellites pointed at the moon or will it depend on the spotty coverage provided by the NASA space array?

  31. 1.3 Lightseconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roughly one second delay might still be acceptable for audio or video communcation, but it will surely take some time getting used to.

  32. Can you hear me now? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Would make for some good commercials.

    Hate to see the roaming charges tho... :O

    1. Re:Can you hear me now? by twosat · · Score: 1

      I can see what competitors to Vodafone will be saying in their ads "Our network is faster, more responsive, NO LUNAR RELAY LAG!"

  33. A Cubesat? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    to develop a space-grade network which would be a small piece of hardware weighing less than a bag of sugar.

    Sounds like someone is using a Cubesat module.

    CubeSats have a mass of no more than 1.33 kilograms per unit,

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"