Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Jeff Bezos Called Out On Counterfeit Products Problem (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNET: Here's the scenario. A small company designs and creates a product and puts it up on Amazon. Things go well. People really like it. They post hundreds of positive reviews. Sales build -- and keep building. Everything is going great. And then, boom, things go south in a hurry. Another company has created a counterfeit version of the product and is selling it under the same name only it's selling it for less, stealing all the sales. That's exactly what happened to Portland-based Elevation Lab, its founder Casey Hopkins said, accusing Amazon of being "complicit with counterfeiting" in a blog post.

The Anchor, Elevation's popular under-desk headphone mount, has been getting flooded with counterfeits, Hopkins said, noting the situation certainly isn't unique to his company. "The current counterfeit seller, Suiningdonghanjiaju Co Ltd (yeah they sound legit), has been on there for the past 5 days and taken all the sales," Hopkins wrote. Adding further insult to injury, he said Elevation has paid Amazon a "boatload of money" to advertise the product that it has "built, invested in, and shipped." Amazon has now purged the Suiningdonghanjiaju listing, which is noted in our cart as "no longer available from the selected seller." It instead defaults to Elevation's own stock. Hopkins told CNET that counterfeiters have been purged at least five times in recent weeks only to return a week later under a different seller name "to hijack the listing." He said it takes Amazon 5 days to remove the seller.
"If you have a registered brand in the Brand Registry and don't sell the product wholesale, there could be one box to check for that," Hopkins wrote. "And anyone else would have to get approval or high vetting to sell the product, especially if they are sending large quantities to FBA [Fulfillment by Amazon]. I imagine there are some algorithmic solutions that could catch most of it too. And it wouldn't hurt to increase the size of the Brand Registry team so they can do their work faster." Hopkins took a final poke at Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, saying: "If you're reading this, come on, this is Day 2 activity."

169 comments

  1. Slashdot Confirms It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is dying

    This may be the last first post, m'ladies ((tips fedora))

    1. Re: Slashdot Confirms It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s extra sad if you remember how it used to be in itâ(TM)s hey day.

      After the last few days, I expect the next take down to be the last one.

    2. Re:Slashdot Confirms It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is dying

      Your opinion; nobody cares.

      I'm sorry.

  2. Whatâ(TM)s not counterfeit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is my DAMN balls, for u to suck

  3. It's been going on too long by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    This has plagued Amazon for the longest time, and what makes it worse is when the counterfeits get sent to Amazon's warehouse for shipping. People trust items that go under "Prime" and don't realize they may be marketplace items. I've gotten several fake batteries and other items, and while Amazon has refunded me, I know not everyone is so discerning.

    1. Re:It's been going on too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse Amazon pools them in with products they sell. So you may think you're buying razor blades from Amazon, but it's the counterfeit ones that Amazon sends you because they have the same packaging and UPC.

      Amazon does not care. Sure you can get refunded if you complain, but the problem continues.

      Amazon should end marketplace sales unless the seller is confirmed and not some shell Chinese company.

    2. Re:It's been going on too long by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It affects search so much that I don't go there if I can help it. Otherwise I have to wade through pages of counterfeits and knockoffs and "related products" before I find the actual product I explicitly searched for.

      It's not like adding "genuine" to the search helps either - that just tends to exclude the real product, while generating hits for "genuine cable for [insert brand}". (It's a genuine cable, as opposed to a painted rope, I take it.)

    3. Re:It's been going on too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fake "Apple" gear is rampant. I don't think I've ever gotten a legit Apple product through Amazon. All fakes. Everything from USB chargers to Beats.

      Throw in fake Gillette blades, batteries as you said, and clothing. All while Amazon looks the other way.

    4. Re:It's been going on too long by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the batteries are really starting to piss me off, and I would say they are by far the biggest issue. The batteries have destroyed about $1,200 worth of electronics and badly damaged a $1,000 desk for me in the past two years.

      I am happy to get the random Chinese bike lights (my bicycle looks like a Christmas tree), because they get stolen constantly, but I do buy a proper main light retail from a trusted store.

      But now if it is anything expensive (or really cheap) I think twice about buying from Amazon.

    5. Re:It's been going on too long by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      They need to add standard search options, like -genuine would remove all products with genuine in the listing.

    6. Re:It's been going on too long by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Does Amazon have a "report" option for buyers to flag fraudulent vendors?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re: It's been going on too long by sevenisloud · · Score: 1

      In the world of electronics at least the trust is already gone for me; at this point I wouldn't buy electronics from Amazon and more than I would from eBay.

    8. Re:It's been going on too long by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I never heard of the companies in TFS. So if I go to Amazon to get an under desk headphone mount, I won't be able to know which company makes the "original" one. I just look at prices, compare features, then pick whichever seller seems better to me.

      The stores' host (Amazon) must ensure the right company sells the right product, and eliminate fake/counterfeit sellers.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re:It's been going on too long by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Even worse are the overpriced items. When I can walk into a store and get the Item for 70% less, there is a problem. The whole point of online shopping was that it was suppose to be cheaper. So not only do I pay more but I have to wait for the item. My how times have changed.

    10. Re:It's been going on too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife got counterfeit makeup from a Prime seller that gave her an eye infection. I don't use Prime Videos, so I'm not sure if Prime is worth it for the free shipping anymore and I'm really trying to kick my Amazon habit and give up the Prime membership.

    11. Re:It's been going on too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry to hear of your wife's eye infection. I wonder what the ingredients were of the makeup Amazon sold you. I bought a well regarded (by me and many others) hair product on Amazon, and it didn't seem to work. I decided they must have changed the formula, so stopped using the product. A year later, I saw it at an Ulta store, and bought it (since I still had never found one that worked better), and it worked fine. Obviously, the product from Amazon was a fake (or from a bad batch). I was totally shocked that the mighty Amazon, once so trustworthy, would sell counterfeit products. Also, I wonder what was actually in that fake bottle? Probably water or something from the dollar store. As for Prime, if you check local stores, you will often find lower prices. I guess Amazon has to compensate for their "free" shipping. But for hard to find specific items, Amazon is still great, although if now, the authenticity of their products is coming into question, everything becomes uncertain.

    12. Re: It's been going on too long by satinee777 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. Thinking about leaving Amazon.

  4. Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Americans need to pull your heads out of your asses and fix your fucking society so you don't NEED to buy cheap Chinese shit.

    Then tariff and trade war the fucking Chinese locusts back to the 19th Century.

    Fuck em.

    1. Re:Fucking Chinese. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      America needs the Chinese a lot more than the Chinese needs America. China sells to a lot more countries, which combined dwarf what the US buys. But the opposite is not true - the US depends on Chinese production to a very high degree.

      With the dollar based oil economy being on its last leg, the US will lose more and more control, and protectionism will do more harm than good. Already, the rest of the world can go on without the US a heck of a lot better than the US can go on without the rest of the world, and as the last control measure dwindles, this is going to be even more apparent.

    2. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will all be fixed soon enough. MAGA!

    3. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America needs the Chinese a lot more than the Chinese needs America. China sells to a lot more countries, which combined dwarf what the US buys. But the opposite is not true - the US depends on Chinese production to a very high degree.

      Which is what everyone who opposed idiotic deals like NAFTA and TPP tried to explain to people: if all of our production moves out of country, we lose that manufacturing capability and become dependent on potential enemy states. We were dismissed as paranoid and conspiracy theorists, yet here we are today. Your argument is all the reason we need to enact tariffs that will allow US production to be competitive. It is not an argument to deepen our economy's dependency on foreign nations.

    4. Re:Fucking Chinese. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      "You Americans"

      Please identify a single country on earth that doesn't do the same thing and buy cheap Chinese manufactured goods.

    5. Re:Fucking Chinese. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is that US businesses aren't competitive, and need subsidies and government protections like import tariffs to stay alive. As a manufacturer, why would I want to (or should I be forced to) have to pay more to get inferior American steel than I'd pay for higher quality Swedish steel? And as a retailer or consumer, why would I want to (or should I be forced to) buy inferior products made with American steel instead of higher quality steel? That's what happened in the Eastern Bloc, where tariffs made imports near impossible, and quality went down the drain. Protectionism is a communist/dictatorship "solution" that never works.

      If a business cannot compete on either quality, delivery or price, it needs to go away and be replaced with something different that is competitive. Tariffs won't work in the long run - it's like peeing your pants to keep warm.

    6. Re:Fucking Chinese. by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This kind of talk is why trade wars (and wars in general) start in the first place. Everyone gets focused on who would "win", when in fact even the "winner" gets hurt. Trade, done properly, can benefit both parties. Trade wars, consequently, hurt both parties.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re: Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thank Nixon. Once again Republicans have screwed things up.

    8. Re:Fucking Chinese. by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      Trade tariffs are a loose-loose measure. They are basically subsidies for companies that are not competitive enough, and by benefitting from the artifical trade barriers these companies become even less competitive internationally. It takes a while for these obvious and logical mechanisms to kick in, but in the end everybody looses big time.

    9. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please learn "lose" vs "loose". Thx.

    10. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I've learned it.

    11. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden is doing something about it with the help of post office your cheap Chinese products gets taxed and gets an extra fee from the post-office

    12. Re:Fucking Chinese. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      With that kind of logic the US would have never stopped being a colony of the UK. Exporing raw materials and importing manufactured goods. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    13. Re:Fucking Chinese. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you the name of one such company: Samsung.

    14. Re:Fucking Chinese. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "ou Americans need to pull your heads out of your asses and fix your fucking society so you don't NEED to buy cheap Chinese shit."

      We know and we are trying to figure out how to do it. We elected Trump to speed along the process. It has so far gone nicely. We have to deal with Trump but any catalyst for a change in direction was game--and so it had to be done. Get the popcorn.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    15. Re:Fucking Chinese. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      You are correct. This war started decades ago. I wonder what action spawned this reality?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    16. Re: Fucking Chinese. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      If we stop labeling them with words like "republican" then perhaps we will see these people for who they really are?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    17. Re: Fucking Chinese. by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Canada, Mexico, China, & Japan.. order of biggest buyers of US goods. Japan buys 1/2 as much as China. China buys 1/2 as much as CA & MX.

      US, Hong Kong, Japan, S Korea... order of biggest buyers of Chinese goods. The US buys 2.5x SK.

      The only winners when two partners who are highly reliant on each other, wage war.... is no one; not even everyone else.

      Believe it or not, even with the unemployment where it was in 2010, the US does not have the labor force to produce at the level of the Chinese. We would basically go without many of those goods. The Chinese can not keep floating their currency, make all those infrastructure investments, nor keep the people content without the US demand for labor units.

      The US is bitching and complaining about two of its three biggest trading partners. That is stupid and a disaster in the making.

    18. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tight.

    19. Re: Fucking Chinese. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      America needs the Chinese a lot more than the Chinese needs America.

      That simply couldn't be further from the truth... as evidenced by the simple fact that China continues to demonstrate their willing to expend vast resources to prop up our demand or their shit.

      Try harder next time.

    20. Re:Fucking Chinese. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in a country from the former Eastern Bloc, I totally agree.
      It's exactly what happened: forcing locally-produced stuff rapidly decreases their quality (no competition, why should they bother with quality), keeps or increases their price and the customer is screwed.
      There was a point in time when smuggled goods (razor blades) from the Western Bloc were better still cheaper than locally-produced ones (which you couldn't find much of anyway), eerily 1984-esque.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    21. Re: Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No other major market has as many poor people as the USA.

      This means everyone else wants to buy cheap Chinese crap, not has to.

      The US has half its population living out of a cardboard box under the overpass, so those people need to shop at walmart.

      I think the OP means, if the US could raise its living standards then the demand for cheap Chinese garbage would decline significantly. This will then blast China back to the 3rd world.

    22. Re:Fucking Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trade tariffs are a loose-loose measure"

      Which is exactly why Trump is tightening them up!

    23. Re: Fucking Chinese. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      If we stop labeling them with words like "republican" then perhaps we will see these people for who they really are?

      Should clarify. Do you mean Republicans in name only (RINO) or a real Republican?
      Strip away the word Democrat and you'll see who they really are - racist bigots. Just look up Senator Byrd - a recent Senator. Also a KKK Grand Dragon. Right back to Dem Governor Wallace and the Jim Crowe laws. This goes back to the civil war. The Dems were the south, the Reps were the Union. They've been trying to destroy the US ever since the civil war.

    24. Re:Fucking Chinese. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      This needs a mod point.

  5. What We Need Are MORE TARIFFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agents don't fear the reaper.

    Yours,
    Buck Dharma & Gregg

  6. Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe if your product wasn't a 12 cent piece of plastic that you sell for $12 you wouldn't have such a hard time with counterfeits. What does your product do that the counterfeit product does not? It's a stupid plastic hook with a piece of double-sided tape on it. If I see one for $3 and one for $12 then I doubt I am going to give your company my money just so you can afford to show me even more stupid ads to inflate the price of your plastic crap.

    --

    Enigma

    1. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so... much... butthurt....

      that's a nice story, but this is about scaled up companies stealing ideas from small businesses. straight power play.

    2. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Luthair · · Score: 1

      A lot of time the cost of the product is in R&D and creating a market by making people aware that it exists. If your competitor just makes an exact clone their only cost is tooling and manufacturing which will be considerably less than yours.

      You're basically saying it would be fine for a chinese company to clone an iphone and use Apples software.

    3. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by arth1 · · Score: 1

      What you pay for is likely a patent.

      (Which in my opinion should never have been granted; with under-table purse hooks being around for a century, the man on the Clapham omnibus would see it as obvious that large ones can also be used to hang headphones from.)

    4. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except it's not. READ THE FUCKING BLOG! The original sells for $10.74. The counterfeit sells for $10.72!

    5. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      For a second there, I thought you were talking about Apple!

    6. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by radja · · Score: 1

      straight free market capitalism working as intended.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    7. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Then sell it for $10.70 or $9.99. Really, this company is making a piece of formed plastic that would take me all of 15m in a CAD program and I'm not even a CAD designer. You can get a shipping container or about 100,000 units for $2000 shipped to your nearest port or get it 3D printed for ~$5.

      The problem here is the company is trying to rest on its laurels after it had one successful product. As history has proven, to run a business, you need to keep innovating and selling new products. This company would basically be Apple after the Apple II saying "we're done, we shipped a computer, everyone else should stop trying to sell knockoff home computers"

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US patent office will not employ you if you know a bit of law, or can google a bit.
      Yes, the man on the Clapham omnibus (and in those days people could read a newspaper). Well for USA, the expectation would be Mississippi burger flipper - unless he said dang no, thats what coathooks or nails are for..

    9. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Apple did that, then they expanded it out into the GUI that they didn't design, and then sued all of Microsoft's competitors in the x86 GUI market out of Microsoft's way, assuring that only the 500 pound gorilla (Windows) and Apple with a boutique product would exist. Yes, Apple insured that only a huge company could prevail against their Look-n-feel lawsuits, so we are now stuck with just Windows now.

    10. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Lynchenstein · · Score: 2

      A lot of time the cost of the product is in R&D and creating a market by making people aware that it exists. If your competitor just makes an exact clone their only cost is tooling and manufacturing which will be considerably less than yours.

      You're basically saying it would be fine for a chinese company to clone an iphone and use Apples software.

      The Apple analogy is a poor one. That's pretty much what Chinese and Korean companies have been doing: replicating the hardware design and styling the software to look like what Apple produces. Have you SEEN the Apple Watch clones? The difference is Apple is the big dog, and has the clout to take them to the mat in court.

    11. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's a little of both. There is definitely a problem when someone is selling a branded product and a competitor jumps on the same listing with an unbranded knockoff and sells it as genuine. That is bad on Amazon. It's also a problem when you are trying to sell a silicon rubber hook for $12 in anything resembling a competitive environment.

      I actually hate the program that Amazon runs with its "partners" like Elevation. It's something of a puzzle now to try and find the cheapest version of what you are looking for on Amazon, because they really direct you toward their overpriced advertisers. The irony is that most of them are importing cheap shit from China and then rebranding them at twice the price. With enough Google and Amazon search kung fu you can usually find a much cheaper alternative (same product, unbranded), but one that is obfuscated by Amazon's search. One trick is to google image search the product images, since half of these clowns don't even take their own pictures - they just photoshop their logo on the stock images from China.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about windowing environments? I don't know what lawsuit you are referring to, but Apple isn't what kept OS2 from succeeding. Or GEOS. Or Amiga. Or X Windows. Honestly I'm having trouble coming up with a dead soldier by the hand of Apple rather than Microsoft. Apple barely survived itself.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the copy has the same name as the original, it even has the nerve of calling itself "the original" in the Amazon listing.

      I have no problem in people making cheaper versions of popular products, but they have to stand by their own merit.

      Also, if you look closely, on the left product, presumably the copy, the double-sided tape is thinner and doesn't fit properly, the molding marks are more noticeable too. It means that they didn't even bother paying the whole 12 cents required to get to the same level as the original. This is nothing less than a scam.

    14. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Maybe if your product wasn't a 12 cent piece of plastic that you sell for $12 you wouldn't have such a hard time with counterfeits. What does your product do that the counterfeit product does not? It's a stupid plastic hook with a piece of double-sided tape on it.

      So, it's a Command hook? You can get that for less than $12 and it won't damage most things you stick it to.

    15. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you SEEN the Apple Watch clones?

      I have not. Can you post a link to one please?

    16. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if your product wasn't a 12 cent piece of plastic that you sell for $12 you wouldn't have such a hard time with counterfeits. What does your product do that the counterfeit product does not? It's a stupid plastic hook with a piece of double-sided tape on it. If I see one for $3 and one for $12 then I doubt I am going to give your company my money just so you can afford to show me even more stupid ads to inflate the price of your plastic crap.

      There is plenty of room to cut corners on anything, even 12c of plastic and tape. If you look the other way when someone steals another brand identity, then quality will be driven into the dirt because consumers will only be able to differentiate in price.

    17. Re: Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Lynchenstein · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      This.

      Microsoft was paying Apples bills (quite literally) all through the 90s. Apple kept all revenues from sales, Microsoft paid all the bills. They did this purely to keep the "but it's a monopoly" lawsuits at bay.

      Even with that, Apple barely survived.

    19. Re:Be a little more innovative or sell for less $ by Luthair · · Score: 1

      No, the clones are not running Apple's software....

  7. When is it counterfeit and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when is it a competing product? Ok so maybe they're using a similar name and logo and some people get confused, but is that truly counterfeiting? Sleazy yes, but illegal?

    1. Re:When is it counterfeit and by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      If they're using a similar name and logo then that is probably trademark infringement, passing off, or the like, and as such would probably be against the law in most places in the West. If it's a registered trademark, that would surely be the case.

      If they're producing a similar product but without any implication that it comes from the OP's business, those restrictions wouldn't apply. Other things being equal, that's just plain ordinary competition.

      If there are other IP rights involved -- most likely patents or some sort of design right, depending on where you are -- then those might be infringed. However, these sorts of legal rights tend to need a more expensive and time-consuming registration process to acquire, so unless OP has done that, this area probably isn't going to offer much help.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  8. Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by ytene · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few years ago I bought a camera tripod from a small specialist British company... It gets lots of regular (ab)use and is doing brilliantly. About a year after I bought it, I happened to see what looked like a mirror copy, only smaller, being sold on Amazon's web site.

    With no more knowledge of the original company than having purchased one of their products direct, I picked up the phone and gave the company a call. Because it was a small British company at the time, the person who answered the phone turned out to be one of the owners... and we got talking. It turns out that he'd taken a phone call from Amazon one day, with the Amazon person saying something to the effect of,

    "We've got a solid demand for your product, people asking us for something exactly like your current model range and enough to provide about £100,000 of orders. We're going to buy your product in bulk and sell it, and here are the terms you're going to agree to..." [ I'm exaggerating to make the point].

    The small British company decided that they did not want to sell through Amazon, but, believe it or not, ensuring that this happened ended up taking a court case which - despite the win - cost this company a *vast* amount of time and money. In response, Amazon went out and started to purchase rip-off clones from a Chinese manufacturing supplier... Amazon are still selling the rip-off model on their site... This sort of scenario is going to be applicable in every case, of course.

    By now, Amazon will know that some of the products they are selling infringe on original product designs from other companies, but in some cases there may be more to the story than Amazon simply being an innocent victim.

    1. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What is the actual infringement here though?

      Is there some patented tech that makes the tripod work better than others, which was copied? Or did they put a fake logo on it, which is subject to trademark protection?

      Because if it's just an aesthetic design then there probably isn't that much they can do to stop other people making similar ones. The copies aren't fake unless the misrepresent themselves as being the original. And personally I actually like that people make cheaper but 90% as good versions of popular things, because I don't always need the best or don't feel the price is worth it to me.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like normal capitalism at work here. Was there a trademark issue? Was there a patent violated? The thing is what most people call counterfeit and infringing is nothing of the sort. There's nothing stopping me creating something that looks like something else and selling it at half the price providing there's no trademarks or patents being infringed on. That is why big companies are so strict on their IP and part of the reason why they attempt to impose some level of DRM.

      If your small British company produces something high quality that gives it value over the cheaper clones it will survive. If it is exactly the same thing, like in this case, a plastic hook with double sided tape then tough. Innovate or starve.

    3. Re: Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because if it's just an aesthetic design then there probably isn't that much they can do to stop other people making similar ones.

      Rounded corners?

    4. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

      Bezos couldn't care less. There's absolutely no penalties for getting caught and trademark/patent protection in these kinds of product categories is nonexistent due to the cost of prosecuting them.

      --
      Organization? You must be joking..
    5. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't care less. There's absolutely no penalties for getting caught and trademark/patent protection in these kinds of product categories is nonexistent due to the cost of prosecuting them.

      Absolutely. I've complained multiple times about rose seeds being sold on Amazon. Roses are not grown from seeds! These ones are obvious frauds, yet nothing seems to convince Amazon to take them down.

    6. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by null+etc. · · Score: 1

      We're going to buy your product in bulk and sell it, and here are the terms you're going to agree to..." [ I'm exaggerating to make the point].

      In Amazon parlance, this is known as "taking inventory".

    7. Re: Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is even better are the five star reviews for a fake product.

    8. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by ytene · · Score: 1

      There was an issue, but for the life of me I could not recall whether it was trademark or patent. Rather than make a false statement, I decided not to go to that level of detail.

      I do appreciate that you ask about an extremely relevant point, but I don't want to dilute the validity of my statement with factual error.

      Hope you understand.

    9. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No worries :-)

      In this particular case in the article there actually is a fraud case as the product is a proper direct rip-off with the same logo, name, and the listing even says "the original" in the title.

      Though anyone selling a cheap gadget these days if they didn't think of registering a trademark at the start... well you live with the poor business decisions you make.

    10. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      What is the actual infringement here though?

      Is there some patented tech that makes the tripod work better than others, which was copied? Or did they put a fake logo on it, which is subject to trademark protection?

      Because if it's just an aesthetic design then there probably isn't that much they can do to stop other people making similar ones. The copies aren't fake unless the misrepresent themselves as being the original. And personally I actually like that people make cheaper but 90% as good versions of popular things, because I don't always need the best or don't feel the price is worth it to me.

      It's likely trademark. Trademark is fairly broad and it covers basically anything that could make your product be confused with another.

      In many jurisdictions, you don't even have t infringe on the trademark, but simply attempting to pass something off similarly to the real product. So if you created a "jPhone" and basically put it in a box very similar to the iPhone and simply sold that, that could be part of the crime of "passing off". Basically you're trying to make your product look so similar to another product on the market that people cannot easily tell they are not buying the original product. This is especially so if you're buying up search terms that make it seem like you're actually selling the original product.

      It's why you often see lines in big print at the end saying "THIS IS NOT A REAL XXX BRAND PRODUCT. THIS PRODUCT IS MADE BY ChinaCopyCat Shenzhen"

    11. Re:Amazon Can Also *Be* The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is more or less exactly how youtube works and how these big companies became big to begin with. Piracy.

  9. Elevation Lab's website is filled with trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privacy Badger blocks 12 different tracking cookies. Clean up your own website, Elevation Labs, and I might start to feel sorry for you.

    1. Re:Elevation Lab's website is filled with trackers by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Oh grow up. NoScript is blocking 13 sites on Slashdot. Get with the program.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Elevation Lab's website is filled with trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and Slashdot sucks ass too. What's your point?

  10. Amazon is being gamed by all by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    There are companies that set up a storefront, collect orders and forward the order to another company, pure arbitrage play. The seller is busy making and selling product. This arbitrage guy comes in lists the same product at multiple price points and advertisement and marketing scenarios.

    Chinese counterfeit products are known all over the world and people are wary of them. America is so insulated and well protected in the past by good law enforcement from fake products and infringements. So in some sense most American consumers are naive, unfamiliar to such scammers. Amazon is the big enabler and the race to the bottom will be very fast. Soon most Americans will learn not to be so trustful of the vendors.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Amazon is being gamed by all by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I feel like in general a lot of consumers don't really understand when they aren't buying from Amazon and this is losing goodwill for their brand (evidenced by product ratings). Unfortunately Walmart, Best Buy, etc. have all copied Amazon's model (well ebay really) so there may be no one left offering decent competition.

    2. Re:Amazon is being gamed by all by shess · · Score: 1

      There are companies that set up a storefront, collect orders and forward the order to another company, pure arbitrage play. The seller is busy making and selling product. This arbitrage guy comes in lists the same product at multiple price points and advertisement and marketing scenarios.

      Chinese counterfeit products are known all over the world and people are wary of them. America is so insulated and well protected in the past by good law enforcement from fake products and infringements. So in some sense most American consumers are naive, unfamiliar to such scammers. Amazon is the big enabler and the race to the bottom will be very fast. Soon most Americans will learn not to be so trustful of the vendors.

      Amazon is selling products which are listed as made by the original manufacturer and shipped and sold by Amazon.com, with a picture of the original product, but what you receive looks materially different from the picture, and is either counterfeit or the brand trying to destroy themselves. They sure do have arbitrageurs shipping me knockoff crap from China, and I do intentionally order from them when I don't want to wait a month for something to get to me via packet post. But that case is a far cry from Amazon itself mis-representing the product.

      [I understand that the case in the article in question is clearly faking it. But the case I describe above happened to me in January, and Amazon was basically "Thank you for your feedback! Let us know when you want to order another one."]

    3. Re:Amazon is being gamed by all by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

      Amazon isn't the victim - it's complicit in the creation, production and selling of fakes. I used to think Walmart was the top scam product vendor but Amazon has taken the lead.

      --
      Organization? You must be joking..
    4. Re:Amazon is being gamed by all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, severely curtailed my use of Amazon over the past few years when I got several items that, with a little inspection, turned out to be counterfeit or otherwise misrepresented.

      I'm also reminded of other stories where Amazon doesn't actually keep items separate from separate dealers, so if I by Product X from dealer A, Amazon's warehouse may have product X stored in the same area as dealers A, B, C, G, Z, and they just grab any of X, no matter that it turns out dealers C, G, and Z all are selling bootlegs, so it's pure chance if you get a "real" product or a knockoff.

      That's the only thing that seems to explain some of the crap I've had to return, at least. I swear I've ordered from legit dealers, but over the past 2-3 years, sometime what shows up it anything but legitimate.

      I've got no idea now how to be confidant of what I'm getting, so as much as possible I order direct from a dealer's own website, instead of their "store" on Amazon.

    5. Re:Amazon is being gamed by all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like a casino! House always wins.

  11. They need to end the third party sellers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And end the "Fulfilled by Amazon".

    Every problem I have ever had on Amazon was from third party sellers on their marketplace.

    I now check the only sold by Amazon checkbox now.

    Even the legitimate sellers annoy me. All of them pester me for the 5 star reviews - and the ones that have Amazon do all the work "Fulfilled by Amazon" are really annoying. Why should I have them a good review when Amazon did all the work?

    1. Re:They need to end the third party sellers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Good luck. I used to think as you.

      A couple of years ago I bought from Amazon an ide HD sold as new and Amazon sent me a rebagged disk with +50K hours powered on and full of dirt shipped in a flat unpadded cardboard envelope.

      The same day it went back with a printout of the SMART report. No reply, no excuses, no explanation, just a refund a week later.

      And yes was sold directly by the very own Amazon and shipped with Prime, not "Fulfilled by Amazon", nor from the marketplace, precisely because in 2016 an ide disk only could be NOS and I won't trust buying it from any third party. Well, I was wrong and Amazon tried to scam me.

      Guess how many HDs I bought from Amazon since then?

    2. Re:They need to end the third party sellers. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Chris? Is that you?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re:They need to end the third party sellers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

  12. It is a plastic hook by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    When the 'counterfeit' is just as good at 1/3 the price or less including free shipping, then the problem is not a matter of selling cheap counterfeits but having overpriced the original product.

    1. Re:It is a plastic hook by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 2

      Selling a hook is not the problem. Using someone else's brand name to do it...is.

    2. Re:It is a plastic hook by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Selling a brand name at an inflated price when the customer wants a hook is the problem.

    3. Re:It is a plastic hook by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      You mean, like Apple products? Apple sells a brand name at an inflated price, when the customer just wants a good cell phone or computer that works.

      I agree, inflating prices is an issue. But it doesn't give others the right to lie and pretend that their product is the same brand, when it isn't.

    4. Re:It is a plastic hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's steel and silicone. Yes, it's a hook, but it's a very well engineered hook. Sometimes you want things that are solid and well made.
      While it's not something that interests me (They use adhesive, whereas I'm a fan of screw mounting) I can appreciate the importance of quality products.

      However, the issue isn't the build quality, it's that the counterfeit is using their name and branding. Small companies live and die on their reputation, and somebody passing off knock-offs as the real thing does horrible things to the reputation.

      For example: I bought some "Lifeproof" cases. They didn't fit the phones they were designed for, the gaskets were all hard plastic that wouldn't seal at all, and the case wouldn't even latch closed while empty.
      Obviously, this means that "Lifeproof" products are overrated and not worth the money, right?
      Wrong! The cases I bought turned out to be imitations. The packaging was quite convincing until I looked closer at the details and materials, and I could only tell because I had purchased real ones previously.

    5. Re: It is a plastic hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. They OWN that name. They spent real money on marketing and creating that brand.

      Then some ass clown like you comes along and says it's perfectly ok for some Chinese fly by night criminals to STEAL their brand name and sell a cheap knock off of their product becuae why? Becuae YOU in all your glorious God granted wisdom have solely determined their price is too high therefore they should be robbed.

      What gradeschool are you attending? I'm going to pay one of the big kids to beat the shut out of you.

    6. Re: It is a plastic hook by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Nope. They can own that brand. The competitor shouldn't be allowed to use that brand. Are these direct counterfeits we are talking about?

      Any idiot should know that the knock-off product is the choice to make, unless there is some reason the branded one is better.

    7. Re: It is a plastic hook by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Are these direct counterfeits we are talking about?

      Yes. I think I'm buying brand X, what showed up looked like brand X, but was manufactured by a different company.

      Any idiot should know that the knock-off product is the choice to make

      How far are you willing to take this ignorant argument? Keep in mind, we are talking about true counterfeit products, not a consumer being given the choice between brand name and generic. Since we love car analogies around here, are you OK with your local tire shop selling you a set of Goodyear tires that were manufactured by god-knows-who? Full-well knowing that there is a much higher likelihood that the tires are sub-standard?

      unless there is some reason the branded one is better.

      Ah. There it is. That's the fun part about counterfeit goods, you have absolutely no way of knowing if one is better than the other. And you have no choice if you get a "good" one or a "bad" one. Store brand products are a great example of this. You have Zipoloc (tm) quart storage bags right next to Great Value (tm) quart storage bags. One box is $7, the other is $5. I have a choice as a consumer, if I feel the Great Value brand meets my needs I can purchase that. But I also have the expectation that if I choose the $7 box it better damn well have Ziploc brand bags in it.

  13. Bad Article by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Its amazing how someone can write an article that long and not even cover Amazon's lawsuit a few months ago.

  14. I love these Chinese products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently purchased from one of the Chinese knockoff companies - on purpose. The American product was $35. The Chinese clone was $3, and appeared to be of the same quality of materials and construction. I honestly could not tell which was which when I saw them side by side. Of course I'll be buying the Chinese ones in the future.

    This has happened with other things too: I had a chance to buy an American power saw for $500 or the Chinese copy for $60. Got the Chinese one. It feels very well made and has held up now to many years of use. Why should I have wasted my money on the American one?

    Compete or don't, but don't bitch just because someone out competes you. Capitalism: that's what you were all preaching back 50 years ago. just because you are being beat at your own game you don't get to suddenly cry foul.

    1. Re:I love these Chinese products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently purchased from one of the Chinese knockoff companies - on purpose. The American product was $35. The Chinese clone was $3, and appeared to be of the same quality of materials and construction. I honestly could not tell which was which when I saw them side by side.

      Yeah, I'm guess you didn't take the item apart and inspect it, or it wasn't electronic. They way Chinese knock-off of electronics get to be so cheap is by cutting corners on the internals, typically in ways that make an inferior (poor performance or damages other equipment) or out right dangerous (electrical or fire hazard) product.

      I didn't think much about the knock offs until I start doing some comparisons of the real and knock off Apple chargers, and the difference in the internals is scary bad.

    2. Re: I love these Chinese products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice except the $500 American version paid for patents, marketing, American jobs, American taxes, social security, etc. The Chinese one had none of those inbuilt costs. That's why tariffs are supposed to exist to ensure that globalism doesn't become a one way street for money and goods to flow out of a country but never back in. Without proper trade regulations and tariffs it's just a system to bleed a country dry. Fortunately it seems like we're finally coming to our senses.

    3. Re:I love these Chinese products by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Go for it. When the half assed main bearings go south, good luck doing anything but tossing it. If you're just cutting up a 2 x 4 on occasion, no big deal to wait a week to buy another $60 wondersaw. If you actually need to use it on a regular basis, well, not so much.

      Lots of 'home owner' tools out there. Black and Decker / Harbor Freight and a couple of others have been selling this crap for years. A main line manufacturer will give you decent main bearings, guide fences strong enough to actually cut in a straight line, bolts made of of real steel and the ability to actually get something fixed. But if you don't need that sort of support, be my guest.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:I love these Chinese products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese clone was $3, and appeared to be of the same quality of materials and construction.

      When you actually know what your looking at you find they aren’t even close. This is what what happens when you cheapout.

    5. Re: I love these Chinese products by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      "Nice except the $500 American version paid for patents, marketing, American jobs, American taxes, social security, etc. The Chinese one had none of those inbuilt costs. That's why tariffs are supposed to exist to ensure that globalism doesn't become a one way street for money and goods to flow out of a country but never back in. Without proper trade regulations and tariffs it's just a system to bleed a country dry. Fortunately it seems like we're finally coming to our senses." --AC

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    6. Re:I love these Chinese products by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      The American product was $35. The Chinese clone was $3

      Second-hand account: A government organization purchased a large quantity of cheap network cards. The reason they were so cheap was that it was a mass-produced knockoff, where all the network cards were identical down to the MAC address. This resulted in a MAC address conflict that brought down the local network, and the counterfeit company ran off laughing with their money.

      If you see a cheap knock-off, it is likely to be a cheap knock-off that will cause problems if you need anything more than basic use.

      Compete or don't, but don't bitch just because someone out competes you.

      If they were competing, they would use their own brand name (or perhaps no brand name) rather than trying to pass their own product as something else.

    7. Re: I love these Chinese products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All very awesome but I don't give a fuck about American patents, marketing, American jobs, American taxes, social security, etc. I'm just like a CEO of a big American corporation - I only care about myself.

  15. Nice grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Calls out' is not a complete phrase. Calls out whom? Calls out what? If you meant he's trying to crack down on knock-offs, meh. He has such a monopoly on everything else I don't know that it matters. I would like to see *him* regulated, personally.

    1. Re:Nice grammar by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Is English that difficult for you?

      It's redundant enough that you should be able to make sense of things even when they miss a word here or there, though "Amazon's Jeff Bezos Called Out On Counterfeit Products Problem" isn't missing anything. It says who was called out. It says what they were called out for. It doesn't say who did the calling out, but that's not important because Bezos is the party that matters.

  16. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by cirby · · Score: 2

    It's a hook to hang your headphone so it doesn't take up desk space.

    Actually looks liker a nice product, I think I'll buy one.

  17. Amazon has no incentive to change... by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even worse Amazon pools them in with products they sell. So you may think you're buying razor blades from Amazon, but it's the counterfeit ones that Amazon sends you because they have the same packaging and UPC.

    Amazon does not care. Sure you can get refunded if you complain, but the problem continues.

    Amazon should end marketplace sales unless the seller is confirmed and not some shell Chinese company.

    More than Amazon doesn't care, Amazon has no reason to care. I'm sure they get paid the same/similarly whether the product is the real deal or not.

    Several years ago, I made the mistake of buying a MicroSD card for my phone from them. (Hey, I got burned, it doesn't happen often.) I got an 8GB card in a 64GB Samsung-branded package that looked like a 14-year-old's first attempt at making a fake ID, and I had to *fight* with Amazon to get the charges reversed. The seller even had the gall to demand that I send it back to them. A quick call to Samsung and the RCMP had Amazon cheerfully refunding to my credit card.

    It's as bad as Pacific Mall in Markham.

    How could any allegedly intelligent business leader not know how rampant the corruption is within his own company? I wipe my ass with Amazon. I hope they tank. I hope Jeff Bezos gets counterfeit chemotherapy drugs.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      Anyone want to bet that there will be not a single counterfeit Alexa device on their site, but counterfeit memory and headphone hooks are fair game!

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    2. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's because my Amazon account was opened in 1998, and been Prime since it came about, but they don't fight me on refunds at all. I have several items that weren't showing as delivered (APO to middle east), and I messaged them to tell them they had in fact been delivered, and they apologized and gave me a $5 credit. WTF? I think they see such an old account and just give in to anything, lol

    3. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Interesting on a few fronts.. you are close to markham and had a counterfit samsung.

      I've had the same deal, bougt a 64gb, clearly fake. after contacting the seller they toyed with me for a bit until i told them i was leaving negative feedback, contacting amazon, and my credit card company to reverse the charges.

      i agree, they need to do something with the marketplace sales.

      As time goes on i find amazon is turning into aliexpress (chinese imports), but with really fat margins in exchange for reduced shipping times.

    4. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Its going to turn into eBay if they do not fix this fraud vector. Business moves at the speed of trust.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Could be true. I do feel that Amazon kisses my ass way-too much as well. I hear some have been able to exploit the return policy to yield millions of dollars in profit.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    6. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Amazon's lips are firmly glued to my posterior. It's really hard to not take advantage when half the time they don't want the smaller items sent back, but I don't because I like the no-hassle returns and refunds I currently enjoy and would rather not screw that up.

      Hell, a couple times they've refunded and replaced an order in response to my contacting them about a shipping issue, only to have the original shipment arrive the next day (and before they shipped the replacement). Both times, I contacted them to let them know I got the original shipments and there was no need to send replacements. Both times they insisted and suggested that I sell or gift the duplicate items.

      And I've not once had to drive 20 minutes and stand in line for an hour to return something, only to be denied because the receipt was illegible (because they don't maintain their receipt printers and it wasn't legible when printed). That's why brick and mortar stores are fucked; the entire experience is better online. That and the UPS guy carries the 28lb bag of cat litter up the stairs for me, sparing my already-injured back; I'm sure I'm not the only one who appreciates that benefit.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Pacific Mall is always a stop for me when I'm north of the border. Lots of amazing stuff I want to buy but there is NO way US Customs would let me back home with half of it.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    8. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As time goes on i find amazon is turning into aliexpress (chinese imports), but with really fat margins in exchange for reduced shipping times.

      Exactly this. I no longer buy anything from Amazon that they can't deliver prime in a couple of days, because if not it's for sure coming from China. That's not a 100% guarantee, but much like aliexpress you don't really know what you're getting and kind of have to hope for the best.

    9. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refunded your card? You should have refused payment and filed a fraud complaint against Amazon with the police if it was fulfilled or advertised by Amazon. Companies get away with this crap because most people are complete pushovers. You should have gotten back more than simply what was taken from you.

    10. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, Amazon bought out Washington Post. The washington post will tell us no one sees a problem with it.

    11. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Now I understand why Amazon has been so, so, slow setting up in Australia, extremely bad consumer practices according to Australia consumer law. Basically the person or company who sells the product is liable for the quality of the product and it's fitness for purpose claimed. Get caught enough time selling fraudulent products and not that many, say 100 complaints and further investigation and serious prosecutions would occur. Hence Amazon is being real careful setting up in Australia as it will be fully liable for this nonsense, it would be up to them to pursue the counterfeit companies in civil court, after Amazon had paid all penalties.

      I would bet Amazon will be practising entirely differently in Australia unless it will be able to buy off corrupt politicians to change laws but with compulsory voting and the majority voting, it is a hard sell to the public. Interestingly enough Wallmart will not set up in Australia because they can not force union free shops and you can pretty much guarantee the unions would be all over them from the get go, being such a psychopathically anti-union company. In Australia, Amazon will also have to be a union company so, air conditioned distribution centres, no ambulance bullshit, again the reason for delays.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      It's already worse than eBay, in a way. At least with eBay, you can somewhat use the seller feedback to determine if a product is likely to be fraudulent. On Amazon, due to mixed FBA, you have no idea whose product you'll actually receive even if you order an item sold by Amazon.

    13. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How recently have you returned something or asked for a refund? I used to feel exactly like you had but the situation changed for me in the past six months (e.g. either drop off a return at a Amazon locker location 20min drive from me or pay $7).

    14. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      My nearest locker is 5 minutes away at the grocery store I go to twice a week, but that's a moot point because I've gotten returns with free shipping as recently as 2 weeks ago. The return that's being picked up today I'm paying to ship back because of the reason for the return, but that's my fault for not researching better before buying and the $10 and change is still cheaper than gas and wear/tear on my car (and my back) to drive to the nearest Best Buy (10min), Walmart (20min), or Fry's (30min), the hour or more of my time waiting in the returns line, and the stress of arguing with the minimum-wage clerk who's looking for any excuse to not take it back.

      Many things are worth more than money. The lower the amount, the longer that list becomes.

      That said, I didn't know Amazon actually charged return shipping ever until yesterday. In literally two decades, I have not once paid return shipping.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    15. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung has the Royal Canadian Mounted Police defending their brand?

    16. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, this is easy to fix, and would also fix one of my biggest gripes about nearly all online shopping these days. Just expose the options that amazon automatically makes behind the scene.

      For example, which seller - make that very easy to both see and change.

      Another example, which shipping company - make it easy to see which will be used (even for their free shipping option) and easy to change (even if they have to charge more for some of them).

      That latter one bugs the hell out of me. I want to know if the product is going to ship with FedEx SmartPost, normal FedEx, USPS, UPS, etc. Everyone has their own stories of one carrier or another screwing them over time and again, but this is normally a local service issue, not a global issue with the shipper... so let users pick the one that will actually get the package to their door (one of them routinely says I'm not home multiple times, leaves no note, and then marks it as available for pickup from the central office, making them useless in many cases).

      Anyway... give users the choice and make it clear, and this problem will be mitigated to the point that it's not really a problem.

    17. Re:Amazon has no incentive to change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just have not hit their algorithm yet. One day you will, and the party will be over.

  18. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    This looks like something that I could ALMOST use.

    Except that my desk is custom built by me and the keyboard drawer slides back so far as to make this thing useless.....

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  19. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    It's a hook to hang your headphone so it doesn't take up desk space.

    Actually looks liker a nice product, I think I'll buy one.

    Yeah, I don't care about the bad parting lines on the Amazon knockoffs...

    (LOL - Just kidding. I'll get the real ones, from the manufacturer's site, I wouldn't trust Amazon to sell me cigarette butts.)

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  20. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    I know - I'll get a regular coat-hook for $0.99 at Ace Hardware, screw it into the side of the drawers that way it will be out of the path of the keyboard tray, serve the same purpose, not need adhesive, and not violate any I.P.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  21. Quite simple - sue Amazon by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    IF they were smart, they have registered their trademark. When a counterfeit item pops up, not only use a DMCA on the offending listing, sue Amazon for willful misuse of a registered trademark. Trademarks carry the force of patents - it's a Government granted monopoly on a logo and/or branding element. Use it. A few hits at Amazon and they'll quickly pay attention to anyone trying to use your trademark.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  22. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by MightyYar · · Score: 0

    They are charging $12 for an injection molded silicone rubber hook.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  23. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    But then it won't have the brand name obnoxiously embossed down the front!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  24. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by nospam007 · · Score: 0

    "They are charging $12 for an injection molded silicone rubber hook."

    Exactly! And if somebody sells something similar for $1.50 they cry us a river and throw a tantrum like the content mafia.

  25. Is that a rip off by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    or is that competition? If Amazon infringed on a novel patent I could see it being a genuine rip off. But baring that, well, it's a camera tripod. Maybe even a really nice one, but still a camera tripod.

    Now that said, I do think we ought to start thinking (and doing something) about the scenario where Amazon eats the world. Once everyone else is out of business it won't end well for us working stiffs.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. Not true by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    China can't feed it's population without our granaries. Also, you're massively underestimating the power of modern logistics. We need Taiwan for CPU manufacturing. That takes decades to build up. Everything else can be up and running in 5 years or less.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not true by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      A large amount semiconductors are indeed manufactured in South Korea and Taiwan. This means that if war broke out in that region, the world would be literally screwed for several years at least. But the machine tools for those factories are actually manufactured in Europe, the US, and Japan, so it's actually less dire than what it may seem at first glance.

    2. Re: Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just electronics, there's lots of advanced manufacturing done in the region. For example most small engine turbos are made in northern Japan. That's high precision aluminium CNC work that would take a long time to build up elsewhere. The 2010 tsunami took out a couple of factories and hit the Volkswagen group nearly as hard as diesel-gate.

  27. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, you should do what a self-respecting nerd would do: make your own.

    As for whether the price should be based on the marginal unit production cost, by that argument the price for proprietary software should be zero.

    If you sell things, the production cost is just part of the costs you have to accrue. You have development and marketing costs too, and overhead. After all that you have to pay yourself. For low volume items the costs of these things is a big fraction of the retail cost.

    Now if somebody just copied the idea, that's actually fair game under our system if it's not patented. But counterfeiting is freeloading on all the marketing costs by the original developer. And even if you don't think that is wrong, there is the fact that you are misrepresenting what you are selling to the consumer. The honest approach would be to reverse engineer the product and tell the consumer that you'd done so.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  28. No electronics or food from Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've bought some books from Amazon, and they were fine. But electronics, and certainly food products - nope.

  29. Dockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that I received counterfeit Dockers pants from Amazon -- they lasted just one or two washes before disintegrating -- I made a second attempt at ordering that brand of work clothes from Kohls online and they are holding up well

  30. Morons. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    You "invented and heavily invested" in a hook and are now whining that a Chinese company is making said hooks at a tenth of the price.

    I could have designed that thing in under 5 minutes in SolidWorks and had it printed up in about an hour and a half.

    Companies like this need to fuck off and die.

    1. Re:Morons. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      You can go to any home improvement store and buy a METAL coat hook and a couple of screws. They probably come in packs of 3 or 4, so you can mount some for your friends.

    2. Re: Morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another "I could do that a cad program and my 3D printer in seconds" moron.

      Their brand was stolen. Dumbass. Learn to read before spewing like an ignorant child.

  31. Doesn't Amazon do this already? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    "If you have a registered brand in the Brand Registry and don't sell the product wholesale, there could be one box to check for that," Hopkins wrote. "And anyone else would have to get approval or high vetting to sell the product

    I've seen exactly this happen. Amazon restricts some brands or even whole categories until you provide paperwork showing you've either bought it from a reputable supplier or have written permission from the brand owner.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  32. i knew this sort of thing was happening by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i seen it myself, i would find a good product, but not be able to afford it, a few weeks to a couple months later i search amazon for the product and its gone but there are knockoffs that look the same under a new seller with a new account, i even bought clothes and the product delivered to my door was not the same as advertised, amazon is doing the same dirty bait & switch crap ebay has been famous for in the past, somebody needs to do a class action lawsuit on Jeff Bezos and amazon, they need to be in real trouble for this, because if they dont it will contine

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i knew this sort of thing was happening by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      amazon marketplace sellers are doing the same dirty bait & switch crap ebay sellers have been famous for in the past

      There, fixed that for you. Mind you, Amazon allows it, which is just as bad; but let's not pretend that Amazon is the one selling the counterfeit goods and those poor marketplace sellers are the victims here.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  33. #MeToo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happened to me at least once that I'm aware of. I bought some cologne and the packaging was quite legitimate but the product was absolutely wrong.

    1. Re: #MeToo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reallly? You're going to steal the metoo hashtag to complain about counterfeit cologne? The irony run deep in this one.

      Nerd white mysogynist steals female sexual assault hashtag to complain his cheap cologne didn't get him laid....

  34. Get a trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And go after the company violating your trademark.

  35. How to spot Fakes: apple never discounts. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    If you are buying an apple product that is cheaper than you can get it from one of the well known mac Resellers like MacMall, then it's a fake.

    I've gotten some lovely fake apple earphones from amazon. Visually identical, and with packaging declaring it made by Apple. But they sounded crappy, fell apart, and the packaging lacked high end finish.

    I knew they were fakes immediately and the seller said keep them but don't give us negative feedback. I told Amazon but nothing happened. They and a zillion others like them pop up like whack a moles.

    Recently I've seen a new scam in which ludicrously cheap gaming computers are on sale. You add them to your cart. They say in-stock. and then when you check out they vanish and go to out of stock for a few hours. When you write the seller they try to get you to buy it directly outside amazon for an even cheaper price. Nice scam. I've reported them to Amazon but nothing happens. The marketplace ads themselves disappear and new ones show up.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  36. Amazon conflates bad reviews on good vendors too by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Since amazon often merges all the reviews for a given UPC, the reviews saying a product is fake will also tar a vendor not selling fakes. The feedback for vendors is ineffective since they come and go.

    What amazon should do is anytime someone leaves a review they should ask if this review about the vendor, the product or both. Then list the vendor in the Review.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  37. "International edition" Textbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite often Amazon has two separate listings for the same textbook, one at a substantial discount but with cheap printing obviously made in India.

    I've wondered whether this was legit (same as what the airlines do with different tiers of passenger seats) or a counterfeiting scam.

  38. Re: Elevation Lab's website is filled with tracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a moron. They have some cookies your shitty blocker doesn't like so that equates in your dead brain with 'they should get ripped off by chinese criminals'.

    So stupid... so shockingly stupid.

  39. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

    What are you even talking about? No one involved in any of this is opposed to legitimate competition (e.g. someone selling their own product for whatever price they want to set). The problem here is that someone is falsely claiming to be selling someone else’s product when what they’re actually selling is something else entirely.

    The cheap knockoff company is selling a counterfeit item that purports to be the real deal by illegally using the brand name’s trademarks, packaging, and nearly exact product design. No one is suggesting they shouldn’t be allowed to sell their own product under their own name for $1.50. But instead of doing that, they’re falsely claiming to sell a name brand thing for less, literally stealing sales from the name brand in the process.

    And even if you don’t care about brand names (which I have no problem with), you should care about people getting what they pay for, which isn’t happening when these counterfeits get sold in place of the real goods. That’s fraud, plain and simple. The fact that you’re dismissing illegal activities that are hostile towards both legitimate businesses and consumers as nothing more than someone crying about competition is astoundingly absurd.

  40. Patents to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you want to "invent' something that is little more than a piece of twisted plastic and then retire for the rest of your life? With patents and IPee laws you can!

  41. I did this! and it literally hurt me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this! With a torque arm for an electric bike. Amazon has a bunch of cheap ones, half the price of ebikes.com which seems to be the origin of the design. But I bought just the knockoff first. $5 for a piece of steel when the ebikes.com-associated one was $20.

    The knockoff sheared*, my bike's dropouts tore off. I bought a "real" one after and, fingers crossed, it hasn't yet ripped apart from riding.

    So, sometimes look-alike isn't act-alike. At least when the knock-off tore, I was accelerating out of an intersection and still at low speed, so just some bumps.

    *it's STEEL and it sheared - it didn't deform. Ugh.

  42. Two Other Amazon Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are some other Amazon problems that they haven't fixed for years:

    1. They often don't look at returned products before putting them back in inventory. Customer #1 buys a new product, returns a old used banged-up scratched product, and get a full refund. The old product then goes back into inventory to be sold to customer #2. This has happened several times with products we sell. Customer #2 has sent us photos of the obviously old/used products that Amazon has shipped them. (We replaced them directly.) Amazon should photograph every returned item and give the seller the decision on whether to resell it.

    2. Chinese sellers get much cheaper shipping than US sellers because their postal system is heavily subsidized (and US Post then delivers on this side of the ocean for free). Chinese companies can sell items with free shipping for cheaper than a US company's shipping cost alone.

    One other strange thing about Amazon is that there are some sellers with items for hugely inflated prices (2x or more) mixed in with the regular priced sellers. What's going on there? I suspect money Amazon is being used for money laundering.

  43. Re:wtf is an under desk headphone mount? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    As for whether the price should be based on the marginal unit production cost

    Absolutely not my argument. The cost should be whatever the market will bear. Unfortunately for this company, anyone can make even low-volume injection molded silicone rubber for well under a buck. Hell, you could 3D print this thing for around $5. That means competitors that will undercut their high $12 price. I mean, it's a hook...

    But counterfeiting is freeloading

    Agreed, and Amazon was in the wrong. They seem to have fixed the listing, but if people are allowed to sell generics under brand-name listings, that is a huge problem.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  44. All I want is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just reply with a one liner of what you want to change at Amazon. Then a one line explanation as to why.

    I want them to identify the country the item will be shipped from. I’m tired of ordering things from US companies that ship from China discovering the shipping time is unexpectedly weeks delayed only in checkout.

  45. He doesn't care by nagora · · Score: 1

    Bezos doesn't care about you, your business, your health, welfare, or anything except getting your money off you and into his pocket. He doesn't care if you are a thief, a slaver, or a drug-dealer. He doesn't care if the money comes from legal, illegal, or ethically-dubious sources. He doesn't care if you made it by selling people, animals, burning the rainforest, or conning old women out of their life savings. The only thing that matters is that it comes to Amazon.

    Bezos is a sociopath, pure and simple.

    Don't
    Buy
    From
    Amazon

    EVER

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  46. Protips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1: If the seller has a Chinese name, don't do business with them. Never buy from the Chinese.
    2: Google the text of reviews. If it shows up elsewhere, call them out, and make a 1* review with all other products, call them out on Q&A, and report to Amazon
    3: If the seller has a Chinese name, don't do business with them. Never buy from the Chinese.

  47. Re:Amazon conflates bad reviews on good vendors to by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Can't even do that, because with Amazon Fulfillment, you don't actually know whose product you received-- just who claimed the order.

  48. Disney Movies counterfeit years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ordered a Disney DVD and received one which was obviously counterfeit - from the package, let alone the DVD itself not playing. I tried addressing this with Amazon and they never replied.

    1. Re:Disney Movies counterfeit years ago by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      let alone the DVD itself not playing

      You mentioned the unholy duo of "Disney" and "DVD".

      Disney's anti-copy measures can be described as "I've altered the deal, pray I don't alter it further." They produce discs which aren't entirely compliant with the standard, and they don't play in many devices -- and even destroy others.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  49. Re: Elevation Lab's website is filled with tracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got your panties in a wad, therefore I succeeded.