Slashdot Mirror


Russia Secretly Helped Venezuela Launch a Cryptocurrency To Evade US Sanctions (time.com)

According to an exclusive report by Time, Russia helped Venezuelan officials create the world's first state-backed cryptocurrency to skirt U.S. sanctions. The cryptocurrency was launched in late February and was banned by the Trump administration earlier this week. From the report: The new cryptocurrency, a form of digital cash that is supposedly linked to the value of Venezuela's oil reserves, was launched on Feb. 20 during a ceremony in the presidential palace in Caracas. Nicolas Maduro, the socialist leader of Venezuela, declared that it would serve as a kind of "kryptonite" against the power of the U.S government, which he sarcastically referred to as "Superman." Sitting in the front row at that ceremony were two of Maduro's Russian advisers, Denis Druzhkov and Fyodor Bogorodsky, whom the President thanked for aiding his fight against American "imperialism." Both men have ties to major Russian banks and billionaires close to the Kremlin. But they were not the most senior Russians involved. According to an executive at a Russian state bank who deals with cryptocurrencies, senior advisers to the Kremlin have overseen the effort in Venezuela, and President Vladimir Putin signed off on it last year. "People close to Putin, they told him this is how to avoid the sanctions," says the executive, who spoke to TIME on condition of anonymity. "This is how the whole thing started."

109 comments

  1. Glad Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest drug lord ever?

    1. Re: Glad Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Putin is clearly in shape and healthy.

      Trump is an obese mongoose though.

    2. Re: Glad Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok idiot. I didnt say he took drugs. But I dont rule that out either.

      If you look at the 200kilos of drugs then n the embassy, his personal wealth, lack of ethics, remote locations and the funding available.

      If you could do it , you would. Well he CAN.
      Drug lord rarely = addict. Stupid fool. Read the comment next time before your tongue swells and you spout gibberish.

    3. Re: Glad Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is an obese mongoose though

      That's not a very nice thing to say... Poor Mongooses (mongeese?) :(

    4. Re: Glad Putin by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      So what does that make the CIA....

    5. Re: Glad Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, def does NOT make them âthe biggest drug lordâ(TM). Maybe the biggest trafficking organization,but I think he gets the title. Show me otherwise.

  2. Secretly, but thanked publicly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Russian sanctions started, US intelligence agencies gave Putin a year or two before they ran into real economic shocks. Oil has stayed down, but no shocks. Putin is living off his bitcoin gains?

    Or is this article just a test of how quickly Russian troll farms respond to Slashdot? Would that beef up readership for more ad dollars?

  3. Not RUSSIA!!!! again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, you can't even jump a shark when you can only play one note.

  4. Oh look! BeauHD posted a Russia story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water is wet, the sun rises in the east, bears shit in the woods, and BeauHD posts articles about Russia.

    BeauHD must be a Russian bot!

  5. Re:How long? by Ryanrule · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a bit after a russian shill promotes the idea

  6. Typical Slashdot Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just the other day we have the exact same usual suspects who are on here accusing Trump of colluding with Russia to setup this currency... wait for it.. accusing Trump of being Hitler by banning the exact same currency in the U.S.: https://politics.slashdot.org/...

    Typical brain-dead reaction around here.

  7. CryptoCurrency could break the bank? by FudRucker · · Score: 0, Troll

    or make a lot of bankers really pissed off, if all the nations that dont want to use the US petro-dollar for trade it could put a HUGE dent in the value of the dollar, which is not worth much nowadays anyway, i bet all those central banks around the world tied to the Rothschild bank and the Federal Reserve would be ready to start WW3 over it

    "Capitalism is religion. Banks are churches. Wealth is heaven. Poverty is hell. Rich people are saints. Poor people are sinners. Commodities are blessings. Money is God." - Miguel D Lewis

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:CryptoCurrency could break the bank? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      or make a lot of bankers really pissed off, if all the nations that dont want to use the US petro-dollar for trade it could put a HUGE dent in the value of the dollar, which is not worth much nowadays anyway, i bet all those central banks around the world tied to the Rothschild bank and the Federal Reserve would be ready to start WW3 over it

      I don't think that's actually true because if it was then we would probably see burgeoning cryptocurrencies being absolutely demolished by 51% attacks. The banks could easily afford to commission their own ASIC chips and begin slaughtering cryptocurrencies en mass. That fact that they are not doing this means they don't see it as a true threat.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:CryptoCurrency could break the bank? by quax · · Score: 0

      "the Rothschild bank"

      It wouldn't be /. if warmed up illuminati, jewish world domination theories weren't moderated insightful.

    3. Re:CryptoCurrency could break the bank? by jouassou · · Score: 1

      value of the dollar, which is not worth much nowadays anyway

      What are you on about? About 10 years ago, 1 USD was worth e.g. 0.6 EUR and 5 NOK, but now it's 0.81 EUR and 7.69 NOK. Are you just complaining about general inflation?

    4. Re:CryptoCurrency could break the bank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crypto is too unstable to take seriously.

  8. Secretly? You keed using that word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not think it means what you think it means.

  9. First (conservative) post by null+etc. · · Score: 2, Funny

    But... but... but... Hillary Clinton lost the election and the only people who care about Putin's involvement in Venezuela's cryptocurrency are butt-hurt snowflakes who can't accept that their candidate lost.

    1. Re:First (conservative) post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake post, a real conservative would also have bashed Venezuela as a failed socialist state, used one of Killary's nicknames, and defended Putin since we do a lot of bad stuff too.

    2. Re:First (conservative) post by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      defended Putin since we do a lot of bad stuff too.

      No, that's more the type of thing an old-school Ted Kennedy liberal would do.

    3. Re:First (conservative) post by nonBORG · · Score: 0

      Funny how Russia makes the news so much, They are about 10% size of the US in terms of GDP. Now they helped so they say another worthless country done something pointless. How is this even news, except for buzz words of crypto currency, Russia and Trump.

      --
      You can't handle the truth! - Because I don't post left all my comments get modded down, bye bye Karma.
    4. Re: First (conservative) post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Only faggo leftists self-flagellate, sniveling and weeping, begging forgiveness for crimes they didn't ever commit.

    5. Re:First (conservative) post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have sucked his dick, being a cowardly Republican faggot traitor, good point?

    6. Re: First (conservative) post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask your fellow n1ggers at Fake News, or faggots at Soros' headquarters.

    7. Re:First (conservative) post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 80s called, they want their foreign policy back.

    8. Re:First (conservative) post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how Russia makes the news so much, They are about 10% size of the US in terms of GDP.

      North Korea is even smaller and easily make the news.
      Turns out you can get into the news pretty easily when you are hostile.
      No-one cares about someone just minding their own business.

      Heck, you can be a single person without income at all and still dominate the news if you shoot up a school. (Assuming that you actually hit enough people.)

  10. How's those sanctions working out? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They seem to be doing a great job of getting them to hook up with Russia. They're also keeping food and medicine out of the country. I'd like to say that at least we're not supporting a dictatorship, but that ship kinda sailed when Trump congratulated Putin on his victory. Helping the Saudis bomb Yemen isn't helping either. We don't have a lot of moral ground to stand on in that theater.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:How's those sanctions working out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it today, is Trump an ally of Putin or is he against Putin but inept? Whatever fits your emotion-driven narrative rsilver?

    2. Re:How's those sanctions working out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sanctions target only the regime, which actually does a great job himself of keeping food and medicine and toilet paper out of the country. Nice for once to have the West on the right side. That's not the case every time on the world stage, which should serve to correct the West's course, not for merely engaging in Whataboutism.

  11. Hope some people got fed by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    You know its not the government that will suffer, I hope it helped some people there. Why cant people just fucking get along...

    --
    [($)]
  12. Evade US sanctions by manu0601 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the goal was just to evade US sanctions based on dollar, why not just trade oil in ruble or yuan?

    1. Re: Evade US sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cause itâ(TM)s a failed state, and everything is a shit-show.

      How many have died, or will die of starvation now? Anyone keeping track? Nahhh, fucking media doesnâ(TM)t care. But the stench of rotting bodies will eventually waft to neighboring nations.

    2. Re:Evade US sanctions by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Oil is just not worth much for some reason.
      Venezuela needs oil to be much more expensive all the time to fully support its failed Communist government.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Evade US sanctions by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      If the goal was just to evade US sanctions based on dollar, why not just trade oil in ruble or yuan?

      It's simple: the sanctions are not based on any specific currency. This bypasses the sanction because "petro" is not a (recognized?) currency.

      I would however like to point out that Venezuela has put itself in a precarious position because any motivated nation-state could easily perform a 51% attack on "petro" and utterly destroy it.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Evade US sanctions by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      I would however like to point out that Venezuela has put itself in a precarious position because any motivated nation-state could easily perform a 51% attack on "petro" and utterly destroy it.

      I'm guessing the blockchain is closed, so Venezuela can control how many clients connect to it. I don't think the Petro is designed for regular people to use, but as a method for the government to do forex trading with other countries.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    5. Re:Evade US sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) This doesn't bypass the sanctions since there are separate sanctions against trading in the Petro.

      B) 51% attack can't yet be done since Maduro sold very little of the Petro. I guess they would always 'print' more to ensure that they own >50% of the currency, making 51% attacks impossible.

    6. Re:Evade US sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to be vulnerable to a 51% attack, it would have to actually be a cryptocurrency. Is there any evidence that it is? Where are the technical details?

    7. Re:Evade US sanctions by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And America needs to be constantly at war to help support its failed Democracy.

      Democracy is an awful way to run a country, but it's the best system we have. - Winston Churchill

      Although I have trouble understanding how only having two political parties to vote for makes a "Democracy".
      Especially since your guvment have been slowly chipping away at your own constitution for decades, next will be the right to bear arms. Most (if not all) of your nutters who shoots up a school was flagged as a potential risk, but NOTHING was done. WHY? So they can point at the violence and deaths and say, "See, guns are bad, only we the guvment should have them".

      America, the land of the not so free.

      Reagan shut down a LOT of mental institutions and all those nut jobs have been roaming the streets, it's a recipe for massacres as has been proved again and again, yet NOTHING is done. WHY?

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    8. Re:Evade US sanctions by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Because oil is traded in dollars internationally. Russia and China want to end that monopoly (ie control) by introducing another way to trade oil. This has been in the works for a while, looks like it's finally coming into fruition. It will be interesting to see what the value of the dollar is when countries start dump it back into circulation instead of keeping it to buy oil. Hyperinflation here we come! Just a pity that it's going to cause chaos worldwide when it's cheaper to wipe your ass with a hundred dollar bill than use toilet paper.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    9. Re:Evade US sanctions by mjwx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Democracy is an awful way to run a country, but it's the best system we have. - Winston Churchill

      If you're going to quote someone, quote them properly (or at least say your paraphrasing or from memory).

      "Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time" - Winston Churchill, 11 November 1947.

      The full quote is:
      "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.â¦"

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Evade US sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people "roaming the streets" now are NOT from activities 40 plus years ago. And do look into the reasons for that policy, it was a "its not fair to commit people involuntarily!" from the other side of the aisle that led to the decision.

      Seems yet again, one party cannot accept any responsibility for what it passes. On one side it's "blame the other guy" for what they do, and then "blame the other guy for not stopping us!".

      Sacramento's entire last half century in a nutshell right there

    11. Re:Evade US sanctions by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      They still want to trade in usd, that’s why. Ruble and rmb are shit.

    12. Re:Evade US sanctions by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Yeah ok ivan

    13. Re:Evade US sanctions by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      I don't get it? Is calling me a commie about the worst insult you can manage? I suppose if I was a brainwashed American I might be mortally offended, but all I am really getting offended about is your lack of capitalisation. I also find it highly amusing that in your so called democracy with it's vaunted freedom of speech as soon as I say anything you don't like your response is something akin to a five year old's "you're a doodoo head". Where is the reasoned discussion? The counter argument supported by fact and eloquently worded. I think your "free world" education is somewhat lacking.

      So I will try to bring this post down to a level you can understand and appreciate (although I fear it may require a frontal lobotomy and about a year's worth of sniffing glue, but here goes).

      Yeah, OK Billy Bob.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    14. Re:Evade US sanctions by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Seems yet again, one party cannot accept any responsibility for what it passes. On one side it's "blame the other guy" for what they do, and then "blame the other guy for not stopping us!".

      So get rid of BOTH FUCKING PARTIES! It's a pretty shit democracy if your ONLY presidential choice is crap and crappier.

      people "roaming the streets" now are NOT from activities 40 plus years ago.

      So they rescinded that decision and people who are a danger to themselves and others are being kept in new shiny facilities where they can be evaluated and rehabilitated / helped? Or are both your political parties still waffling on about who is to blame for what happened 40 years ago while the problem is still roaming the streets and shooting the shit out of your schools?

      Slightly off topic, but wtf - from an outsiders viewpoint there is very little difference between your 2 political parties! One likes abortion, the other doesn't. One likes guns, the other doesn't. Big woot.

      What the outside world sees is that both parties like shooting the shit out of countries they have invaded illegally so they can steal their oil.
      I am not American, personally I don't care, I have my own problems.
      If I were American, I would be more concerned about what either is doing *right now* to fix the fucking problem. How do people who are ALREADY on watch lists and have been reported multiple times for erratic behaviour be allowed to walk into a gunshop and purchase (more) guns?
      Anyway, if the populace is unarmed or not it's not going to stop the nutters from killing people, take the recent home made bomb blasts in Austin (I think) using household chemicals and a recipe he probably got from Wikipedia.

      You can take away the guns - but you are not fixing the nut jobs.

      Taking civilians weapons away because of these attacks is an excuse to stop you overthrowing your own oppressors, but by the time you wipe the shit out of your eyes and ears it will be too late.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    15. Re:Evade US sanctions by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1
      Fair enough, I would just like to point out

      "Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time" - Winston Churchill, 11 November 1947.

      If you are going to quote someone, quote them properly, with the full quote, and not some paraphrased version.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    16. Re:Evade US sanctions by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      commie? russia is facist. lol really, commie. update your playbook ivan.

    17. Re:Evade US sanctions by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      The response was so pathetic I.. actually don't give a shit. Except for the fact you cannot figure out capitalization?

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    18. Re:Evade US sanctions by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      so, you cant counter it, so you go for insults. got it.

  13. Anonymous people always confirm your story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where would journalism be without them?

    1. Re:Anonymous people always confirm your story by nnet · · Score: 1

      Before or after intertubes?

  14. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA is much worse, has done terrible things to Russia. I am american and I think USA should not talk bad about the rest of the world when its own house is out of order.

    1. Re:So? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      Lol, you sure sound like one.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  15. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advice and consent? Try unwitting complicity.

    Remember, Trump was literally stupid enough to ignore what his own advisers told him about congratulations for Putin.

    Nobody wants his advice on anything.

  16. Leave Venezuela alone by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their citizens have suffered enough already. Why focus on one dictator when the world is full of them?

    I'm glad Putin did it, even though he's an asshole in general, just like I'm glad Trump reduced H-1B "body-shop" application approvals even though I disagree with most his other stances. I'll give kudos to jerks when they accidentally do right.

    1. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by future+assassin · · Score: 0

      Papers please Comrade..

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    2. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck venezuela. the common people need to rebel against that shithole government. Russia and China, hell, even Cuba, are better than there.

    3. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Not disagreeing with your sentiment (e.g. if Trump pulls the NK thing off), but don't you think that this will enable the continuation of the Venezuelan government which is ultimately responsible for its peoples' suffering?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    4. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of dictatorships, but I can't think of any current regime of any type that is so dysfunctional, including dictatorships under massive total sanctions. Guess who would be holding the bag would Venezuela finally implodes?

      The choice is between mild interference now or far more massive and expensive intervention later.

    5. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Who gave America the right to overthrow dictators? The puppet government that gets installed afterwards by the US is not exactly democratic anyway. "But the people voted!" you say, well if all it took was some Russians spamming stuffs on the internet to alter the US election I don't have much faith in the vote of the "sheeple". Maybe what the world needs is a couple more dictators, instead of ass lickers who start wars to get votes. Libya was a paradise under Gaddafi compared to the "democratic" shit hole it is now. Children getting raped and forced into militant groups, death and disease and starvation. But hey, at least they got to vote!

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    6. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 0
      So fucking what, at least they will have food and medicine. Do you honestly think you are making friends of the innocent people suffering because you want to force your brand of government on them. In fact, why do you not have sanctions against China? They are communist after all, is it because they own half of America? Or is it because you have to buy 90% of everything from them because you no longer have the manufacturing facilities? So, pick on Venezuela instead. What about Zimbabwe, or all the other little countries with dictators. Oh wait, they don't have oil.

      Papers please Comrade

      That would be Venezuela, fair enough.
      This IS America today

      Papers please, oh and your facebook password, and twitter and since you look slightly shifty we are going to xray the crap out of you, and your wife is pretty hot, so she gets a strip and cavity search, and then because you got annoyed about me groping your wife we are going to lock you in a room for hours and question you about your political affiliations and religious beliefs. Then if we think you might be a terrorist we are going to send you to a detention center without arresting or charging you with anything and hold you indefinitely. But not to worry, we have some lovely watersports called waterboarding that we play to keep us entertained, YOU probably won't enjoy it much though. Welcome to AMERICA! Although you won't BE in America, because this shit is illegal there.

      I know which one I would prefer, but then you Americans have your head so far up your ass you probably don't mind the cavity search.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    7. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Guess who would be holding the bag would Venezuela finally implodes?

      Erm, the Venezuelan's? Why should America be left with the bag, unless it's the bag you are holding out to collect their oil.
      In ANY country you can find a group of people (dissidents) who do not like the current political setup. America is fond of arming these people and sending them in to topple the evil regime, and when these terrorists / freedom fighters get their ass handed to them the USA intervenes directly to help the terrorists / freedom fighters to further America's agenda, it has nothing to do with Freedom or Democracy.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    8. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess who would be holding the bag would Venezuela finally implodes?

      Erm, the Venezuelan's?

      Unlikely. Venezuelans are starving to death thanks to Maduro and once the regime falls will be in no position to help themselves. They will receive external help. The only question is whether it comes from the drug cartels or from the West.

      In ANY country you can find a group of people (dissidents) who do not like the current political setup.

      In VZ, it's the majority of the population. That's why they don't have free elections.

      America is fond of arming these peopl... then the USA intervenes directly to help the terrorists / freedom fighters

      If the US wanted to, Maduro would be dead tomorrow. The US and the world doesn't mind the regime or the dictatorship. If it did, it wouldn't be here. It is only when the regime became so incompetent (even compared to other dictatorships) to the point of collapse, that the US started to make noises.

      it has nothing to do with Freedom or Democracy.

      Who cares about the US's motives? Don't hate America so much to be willing to let Venezuelans starve.

      P.S. The majority of VZ oil is coming to the US in any event, because just about no other country in the world has the special equipment and processes required to deal with the extra-heavy crude. If the US wants the oil, it only has to do nothing.

    9. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any evidence that these sanctions or lack thereof have any impact on the lifetime of any given regime. There are plenty of heavily sanctioned regimes which continue for quite a while, and plenty of unsanctioned regimes which were overthrown.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    10. Re:Leave Venezuela alone by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That's their problem, not ours. Let's bud out.

  17. What was secret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title screams "secret" like there was a deeply hidden conspiracy. It's not illegal to set up new cryptocurrencies. It also doesn't seem that the Russians tried to hide their involvement at all.

    Since the U.S. has been undermining, attacking, or setting up proxy wars against Russia and all of its allies for more than a decade I would be surprised if Russia wasn't setting up payback in any way they can.

  18. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ignore what his own advisers told him about congratulations for Putin.

    "Well sir, if you congratulate Putin like every other world leader, including Merkel, Macron, et cetera, is doing, the Democrats will remove the dildos from their asses and shove even larger ones in, for even louder REEEEEEEEing."

    "And if I don't?"

    "Same thing, just without keeping cordial relations with a nuclear power."

  19. Re:How long? by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    Top Russian leadership can code at that level, thats amazing.
    Russian math education is really doing something right.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  20. Why did they need help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a gazillion altcoins. Any idiot can start one. There was even a website that let you stick in a few bitcents and out came a fully re-branded model client. What is lacking in Venezuela that Russia needs to step in and do a thing that 14 year olds can do on their own?

    1. Re:Why did they need help? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      To start an alternative way to trade oil - currently it's done exclusively in America dollars. It's part of what keeps the currency so strong. Take that away and all of a sudden the dollar is going to be worth a lot less. So I suppose in a way it is a form of financial warfare, but one that America started years ago and Russia and China have been trying to break for decades, which is why mainstream media are casting it in such a negative light, without actually saying why it will be a problem.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  21. You mean the complete bullshit sanctions? by Uberbah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    To put them in place Obama had to claim Venezuela was a threat to the United States. Even a habitual liar as gifted as Obama had to struggle with that one.

    And meanwhile, we're still merrily selling tens of billions in weapons to Saudi Arabia at a time. You know, the country where almost all the 911 hijackers were actually from, and a sponsor of jihadist groups across the middle east.

  22. Re: How long? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, so why did Trump's lawyer pay her $130,000 then?

    It's not slander if it's true.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  23. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people complaining about Trump's call to Putin are pathetic. These are the same people who claim the US should be more diplomatic when solving disputes instead of just launching a few cruise and hell fire missiles at the problem. How in the hell will US and Russia relations improve if the leaders of both countries do not talk to each other? Railing against Russian behavior at the UN or any other diplomatic gathering is a waste of time. The only thing that would stop Russia in it's tracks is confronting them militarily through proxy countries. Russia is just trying to stay relevant in world affairs by any means possible. Russia is a 3rd world country with a nuclear arsenal. The state of California has a higher GDP than Russia.

  24. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You seem a bit obsessed with Hilliary Clinton.

  25. We're inventing our own fake currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This crypto currency stuff is going way too far.
    It has no value. (beyond the obvious perceived value where it's worth what someone will pay for it)

    In theory this venezuela thing could work. But I am pretty sure I can't just go pick up a barrel of oil at the terminal for it. And oil gets mined at different rates than the coins.
    Computers crunching math doesn't make more oil get drilled or shipped.

  26. Re: How long? by Luckyo · · Score: 1, Troll

    I must say, this latest bout of inane hysteria in mainstream media has been funniest to date. "He did the exact same thing that pretty much every European leader did, must be collusion/treason".

    Never seen such a direct admission that European leaders are also colluding/treasonous if narrative spun has any semblance of reality. Literally, everyone is guilty. Can it even be termed collusion if everyone does it? The proper name for universally accepted standard is usually "cooperation".

  27. We know what's good for Venezuela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am OK with other nations having whatever they chose. It is like other people's relationships. If they can't think for themselves, I have no business thinking for them. It is sympathetic that you empathise with suffering of fellow humans from a distant land, but you are deluding yourself thinking that you know exactly how they feel, what they want, and what they would trade for what else, if they could. And meddling in their affairs is just over the top - it is questionable at best, suspicious of ulterior motives at worst, and it certainly undermines some important principles like sovereignty and right to self-determination.

    1. Re:We know what's good for Venezuela by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 0

      Agreed, and what makes it even more suspect is that America only seems to care about overthrowing governments with oil. Where was America during Bobs rein of tyranny and violence in "democratic" Zimbabwe? The ethnic cleansing that has occurred all over central Africa? There is no profit in that.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  28. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole issue could be true or it could be a lie. Most businesses will simply pay off a threat to avoid a trial even if they know they could win because the cost of the payoff is less than the cost of the bad publicity.

    Whether or not it is true is irrelevant, what matters is she agreed to an NDA, signed it, took the money and is now trying to get around it because suddenly she sees there's more money to be made and her activist lawyer sees a way to try and tarnish Trump.

    If they had a sexual relationship 10 years ago so what? That's between Mr. Trump and his wife. See, unlike with a previous President, she isn't making any claims of assault or rape and this did not happen in the Oval office. But when it was about Billy the media was all about "his private life", but no that won't do for Trump. The women Billy paid off or Hillary pressured were accusing him of violence against them. No such accusations here.

    So this is nothing more than garbage passing as news to do no more than try and smear the duly elected President because the left and media after almost 18 months since losing still cannot accept that fact. He won, get over it.

  29. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was garbage at Clinton's time too. One woman claimed sexual harassment because he asked for sex and exposed himself in 1991 (there was no assault). This was dismissed due to lack of damages and then brought up again because an intern who had a consensual affair couldn't shut up about it to a friend who recorded everything. Then the former settled out of court.

    The biggest and most serious thing about it all was that everyone wanted to tell half truths and lies about their personal lives under oath. The "media" was mostly Fox News who wouldn't shut up about it well into Obama's presidency. It wasn't until Obamacare that they realized they didn't have enough air time to bash both.

    If the media spends even half that time on Trump's lies.. it will never end. The interns of today will retire and they won't even be half way through.

  30. Re: @#$%@ing Russia stories on slashdot continue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I too am American and hate antirussia stories. I will definitely unsubscribe from Slashdot.ORG because of it!

  31. Re: How long? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    he asked for sex and exposed himself in 1991 (there was no assault)

    Actually exposing yourself to an unwilling person is Sexual Assault. The worst kind of assault.

  32. Re:This has to be the dumbest story on earth by rtb61 · · Score: 0

    Just a 7, to get a 10, they need nerve gas and controlling other countries elections and cyber warfare, as well. If Russia was serious about that, they would have done it themselves and not through Venezuela. The obvious partners are Russia and China, from there reaching out to other countries sick of US interference, that didn't happen so stories about Venezuela are just stories. Right now the US is confused, doesn't want Venezuelan oil any more due to falling demand in the near future for fossil fuels, renewables and electric cars doing the damage. So the high cost invasion of Venezuela on the back burner, no profit in it and the vested interests in the invasion have diminished influence, the war industrial complex, due to high risk of real terrorism in the US.

    Right now manoeuvring around a likely South African civil war seems to be taking priority. As for oligarchs close to the Kremlim, pretty much yesterdays news, Russian Oligarchs under the thumb of the Russian technocracy is far more accurate and Russian organised crime is diminishing. Far more accurate to say USA kakistocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... vs Russia technocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Russian governance has really changed in the last decade and US governance seems to be heading for change as well, at one stage it look like straight up Fascism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... but now it looks to be heading into some pretty serious reform. The UK is just disappearing up it owns backside and the EU just seems to be generally in turmoil not knowing which way to go but push for reform seems to be building. China and India have massive populations to deal with and that creates all sorts of distortions ie maintaining control.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  33. Secretly? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Russians secretly helped Venezuela by sitting in the front row at the launch ceremony. Good catch TIME

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Secretly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, better to encourage economic and informational warfare instead of traditional bombers 'n bullets like Russia preferred in the past:

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/14/venezuela-kalashnikov-drone-production-chavez

      http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/09/11/russia.venezuela/index.html

      I think I prefer the "new" versions of establishing international dominance over the old style.

  34. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst kind?

    STFU

  35. How long until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Venezuela fricks up bitcoin like they did to the rest of their economy?

  36. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    European leaders don't have the geopolitical role the US does (NATO lead, leader of the free world, etc.) nor is there reason to believe they acted against their career expert advisors suggestions, without warning, when they spoke with Putin, representing their own countries.

    Also... since when do Americans feel their president should take the lead from European leaders on geopolitics?

    Knownothing trolls and tools everywhere.

  37. Insert yet more Russian bogeyman waffle by najajomo · · Score: 0
  38. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when it was about Billy the media was all about "his private life", but no that won't do for Trump.

    Also, people forget all too quickly that what got Slick Willie an impeachment was not playing Hide the Cigar, but lying under oath.

  39. I wonder if its Ethereum based by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vaguely remember Russia supporting and test running Ethereum given it's russian background (maybe I'm mistaken) with Putin himself showing considerable interest in it.

  40. Re: How long? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    It was garbage at Clinton's time too.

    Agreed, so can we let this thing go?

    Not on your life will the media let something like this go. Not when there is PROFIT to be made. Who cares about the president, or his wife? Who cares about the country? No, the major media outlets have gone tabloid news on us for money...

    And by the way... Clinton was impeached for lying under oath in the Paula Jones civil suit... Not for the inappropriate relationship with Lewinsky. But the media didn't care all that much then and didn't drag their darling president though the various wallowing hog pits of his past diligences with multiple women, willing and unwilling who where making claims of abuse dating back to Arkansas.

    Clinton was obviously no choir boy and apparently his is an open marriage of political convenience, but I personally don't really care about any of it, as far as the media wants to be even handed about things.... Which is to say, I have to care about the hypocrisy here and will point it out when I see it. I don't care what the Clinton's or the Trump's do or don't do or even who they do it with, as long as we are fair about this..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  41. no by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Obama is a professional liar like every lawyer, it was not habitual nor was he gifted at lying.
    After being elected to office, any politician trying to be popular MUST lie and since they are paid and maintain their job hinging upon that skill; therefore, politicians are professional liars.

    National Security is the last resort excuse to justify anything and to the paranoid people with wild imaginations anything is honestly possible. Multiple cogent arguments can be made against Venezuela's threat... I disagree with most the premises upon which all of those are based but some people DO believe those. So to assume they lie when some batshit crazy decisions come out-- you underestimate the power of the dark side of the force.

    1. Re:no by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Correction: Venezuela is no real threat, I messed up that sentence. Point was that there are different perspectives which can result in logical honest conclusions. The perspectives can involve lies or just be false and obviously dishonest people are involved in creating bubbles of alternative realities for others as a way to control them. This doesn't just happen at Fox News or at that scale. We do it on small scales with people we know-- facebook is loaded with people feeding distorted images of themselves to their peers - who belief it and make incorrect judgments based upon that. Ripple effects...etc.

  42. They're a socialist nation by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that's why. They thumbed their noses at global oligarchy by giving a lot of their oil money to the people at large. Chavez also seized land that was being left fallow for no reason (and did it in spectacular fashion, the well to do were declaring the land was worthless to avoid property taxes. He went to them and demanded they sell them the land at the value they'd declared or pay the back property taxes and fines from lying to the tax man).

    Tl;DR: We're making an example out of them to support a political narrative.

    This is not to say they're a bunch of knights in shining armor. As usual it's more complex than that. Venezuela is rife with corruption. But an unusually high amount of money made it to their working class. But their biggest problem was the price of oil collapsed before they could build an economy that isn't dependent on it. That and a drought that rendered their hydo electric plant useless. That's another thing, folks forget that Venezuela is only about 20 million people. It's small enough that one hydoelectric plant going down is a major economic issue. Add to that international sanctions that kept them from re-financing debt and they're screwed.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They're a socialist nation by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying they are angels, I'm only saying we should bud out of their business and stop harassing them with bans etc. There's dozens if not hundreds of other dictatorship nations that we don't give a hard time to. If they point weapons at us, that's another matter. Maybe they'll start if we agitate them enough.

  43. Re: How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. Bitcoin Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

  45. Re: How long? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    The difference between assault and battery. Assault is the real threat of harm, battery is the actual physical act of harm. So sexual assault is the threat of sexual battery; sexual battery is when the criminal finishes up and says you should put some ice on that...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  46. Re: How long? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    As I said, if your position requires essentially everyone around you to be "knownothing trolls and tools", have you ever considered that it's not the world around you that is wrong, but you?

    Consider that it's very beneficial for you to be wrong in that scenario. Because if you are wrong, you can fix it. If the world is wrong, you're fucked. Because world owes you nothing. It was here first.