Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Hack: Several High-Profile Videos Mysteriously Disappear From Platform, Some Defaced

Several high-profile music videos on YouTube were mysteriously deleted early Tuesday, in what appears like the result of a security compromise. Some of the videos that have been pulled from Google's video platform include Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee's "Despacito" -- which is also the most popular video on the platform. Users reported Tuesday that the thumbnail of the video was replaced by a masked gang holding guns, who identify themselves as "Prosox and Kuroi'sh." Several songs from DJ Snake, Drake, Katy Perry, Selena Gomez, Shakira, and Taylor Swift have also been either deleted or altered with. On Twitter, a person who claims to be one of the hackers, said, "@YouTube Its just for fun i just use script "youtube-change-title-video" and i write "hacked" don t judge me i love youtube." Google has yet to acknowledge the incident. Further reading: BBC.

71 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. And by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing of value was lost.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re: And by belthize · · Score: 2

      To be fair that may just be one guy who's really obsessed with the video.

    2. Re: And by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It could also be that they were quoting their source. That's what quotation marks are for, after all.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    3. Re: And by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      It's the first time anyone's heard of it. That's the purpose of this ad. You should go check it out. Because. Um, because of reasons. It's the most popular!

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    4. Re: And by gnick · · Score: 1

      This would seem to suggest that Despacito is popular with a wider audience than just Spanish speakers. It made a pretty big splash all over.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re: And by lgw · · Score: 1

      "Most popular" is measurable. It has 5 billion views. Gangnam Style "only" has 3.1 billion.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re: And by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      In my experience in South Florida, it's pretty much Basic White Bitches, and Karen "let me talk to the manager" type mothers that enjoy this song.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    7. Re: And by losfromla · · Score: 1

      you mean the women you're invisible to that you wish you could make time with?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    8. Re: And by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      You think you're making fun, but these women are annoying, so no, your insult was garbage. Invisible would be appreciated.

    9. Re: And by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you are invisible also, so, not really a problem for you, right?

      You sound like those fat ugly women who object to women being objectified, mainly cause they aren't being objectified themselves...

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    10. Re:And by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Your tag is wrong.
      Every corporate entity obtains revenue by ensuring you have no other choice, IF it can.

    11. Re: And by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Native speakers or speakers in general? What's the cutoff here?

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  2. If I'm being honest... by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Several songs from DJ Snake, Drake, Katy Perry, Selena Gomez, Shakira, and Taylor Swift have also been either deleted

    Part of me is not exactly outraged. I'm thinking humanity might get ahead for a moment if the flux of stupid is interrupted.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:If I'm being honest... by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every time popular music is involved there is always that guy who has to make a comment like that.
      Probably the same guy who comments on the "poor choice" of music at parties instead of just having fun.

      Popular music is popular for a reason guys. It is not meant to be refined, it is meant to make people happy, and it works. Respect that. Yes it is stupid, partying is stupid, having some mindless fun is stupid, but that's the kind of stupid that makes the world a better place.

    2. Re:If I'm being honest... by belthize · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, I think it's just because this particular new generation has shit taste in music vs my generation, oddly enough the generation previous to mine also had shit taste in music.

    3. Re:If I'm being honest... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Honestly DJ Snake has a good sense of humor. He made this video after all https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:If I'm being honest... by lucm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every time popular music is involved there is always that guy who has to make a comment like that.
      Probably the same guy who comments on the "poor choice" of music at parties instead of just having fun.

      As far as I'm concerned, real music died when heathens turned away from gregorian chants and started to use harmonies and chords. Once that line was crossed, the gates of Hell opened and now we have fat girls with no musical talent on the youtubes.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      ^ This is not what God intended when he gave us the blessed diatonic scale. REPENT, PEOPLE

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:If I'm being honest... by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time popular music is involved there is always that guy who has to make a comment like that.

      And everytime there is someone pooping on pop music, there is that guy who is karmawhoring with exactly these words.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:If I'm being honest... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The three steps of getting old:

      1: The music is great!
      2: The music is just not great anymore.
      3: The music could be great (because it's all covers of the songs I loved in my youth) but they play it ALL WRONG!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:If I'm being honest... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      Popular music is popular because it is popular.

      I'll back up a bit. Popular music is written specifically to appeal to the lowest common denominator, a simple rhythm that resonates with most people in a given region or culture, on a basic level. There are a lot of well-known tricks you can use, including a "heartbeat" rhythm, a straight-forward happy-sounding refrain that is easy to sing along to, a repeated refrain at end of the song with the final repetition a half tone up, there's a whole recipe for making pop music with a reasonable chance at success.

      Obviously, taste is fickle and ever-changing, so you also need a hell of a lot of luck to make a popular hit. The big labels use their influence to push their chosen "hit potentials" to radio stations, streaming playlists (including club music services), TV shows, DJs, all over the place. When people hear a song over and over, it creates associations, and they'll be more apt to put on that song, or request it at parties. It's a cumulative effect.

      This is not intended to put down pop music, a lot of it is extremely well-written for its purpose and produced in an extremely slick, ear-friendly fashion. I don't think anyone can honestly ignore the talent of someone like George Michael, no matter how much they prefer other genres.

      Popular != good, but it's also != automatically shit.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    8. Re:If I'm being honest... by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      You left out: 4. The music is just TOO LOUD!

    9. Re:If I'm being honest... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And 5, it's not loud enough.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:If I'm being honest... by lgw · · Score: 1

      The problem with that line of reasoning is: bands like Led Zepplin and Pink Floyd and Dire Straits and Rush really were better.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:If I'm being honest... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'll back up a bit. Popular music is written specifically to appeal to the lowest common denominator, a simple rhythm that resonates with most people in a given region or culture, on a basic level. There are a lot of well-known tricks you can use, including a "heartbeat" rhythm, a straight-forward happy-sounding refrain that is easy to sing along to, a repeated refrain at end of the song with the final repetition a half tone up, there's a whole recipe for making pop music with a reasonable chance at success.

      Not just pop music - check this out: https://youtu.be/B9FzVhw8_bY

      Obviously, taste is fickle and ever-changing, so you also need a hell of a lot of luck to make a popular hit.

      Taste may change, but I suspect this recipe is very old - certainly older than radio, probably as old as music that's recognizably western (e.g., medieval folk music). Check this out: https://youtu.be/x9g7azfKckc

      It's a modern arrangement, so it's not clear evidence, but certainly the pattern of happy-sounding sing-along chorus and an appropriate beat is centuries old.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:If I'm being honest... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I think this article explains what you're suggesting. I could be wrong.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re: If I'm being honest... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Strangely I still am listening to what I like and new music is coming out all the time but it isn't pop music. Just because German industrial, Scandinavian style Taiwanese death metal, modern classical, etc. isn't being played on any of the pop stations near me doesn't mean that those styles aren't being created. Hell with places like YouTube it is now easier than ever to find new bands/musicians that you might like and with Amazon one can get almost any album.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    14. Re:If I'm being honest... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think it's just because this particular new generation has shit taste in music vs my generation, oddly enough the generation previous to mine also had shit taste in music.

      This new generation has better taste in music than most; music from prior generations (mostly just one generation prior, to be fair) is outselling the stuff supposedly produced for them. It happened in 2015, 2016, and at least the first half of 2017.

      I attribute this fact to new music sounding the same as old music. Even "new" "country" music just sounds like last generation's Top 40 pop, with a little bit of accent and some different instruments. But more importantly, I keep hearing "new" popular music which sounds just like stuff that they were playing on the radio in the late eighties and early nineties. If it's going to sound the same, why not listen to something old? It's probably cheaper.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:If I'm being honest... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Several songs from DJ Snake, Drake, Katy Perry, Selena Gomez, Shakira, and Taylor Swift have also been either deleted

      Haters gonna hate hate hate hate hate.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:If I'm being honest... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I guess I just don't fall into any of your categorizations. I long ago stopped worrying about what other people thought of my favorite bands. Some are or were popular, others not. If it's a decent musical composition that doesn't regurgitate the same 2 measures of musical patterns in endless repetition, it at least stands a chance of being good. Most popular music these days fails even that standard. I also don't wish to "learn to like" some crap. If I dislike like it on first listen history has shown that repeated listening only intensifies my dislike.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:If I'm being honest... by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      How is it that these things make the world a better place? These, and many other things, are assumed to be good because they were previously considered bad. There's no time wasted on determining if things were taboo in the past for any particular reason, just a blind and uncompromising orgy of iconoclastic fervor.

      Everything anyone has ever said is bad must be good because saying things are bad is not nice and not being nice is bad. Liberalism is a hell of a drug.

    18. Re:If I'm being honest... by martinX · · Score: 1

      ... how on earth Pink and Led Zepplin went together.

      Well there was this really great party they were all at and everyone put their keys in a bowl, and then along came the mud shark...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    19. Re:If I'm being honest... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're absolutely right :-) It resonates with us, and has done so for centuries.

      My point with the fickle and ever-changing taste is that you may write and perform a song that hits all of those techniques, gets radio play and is objectively a good candidate for a popular song, but there is no guarantee. It may simply not have the right kind of hook at the right time, it may not hit just that right combination to resonate with people. The big picture is there, but the devil is in the details.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    20. Re:If I'm being honest... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Sure, they were great. But you're forgetting all the shitty bands that were around back then, because they were forgettable, just like most popular music today. Most of this stuff will be completely forgotten in 5-10 years.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    21. Re:If I'm being honest... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think it's just because this particular new generation has shit taste in music vs my generation, oddly enough the generation previous to mine also had shit taste in music.

      Yes, I may be old but I got to see all the good bands.

      There are still a few bands who make decent music and I know sturgeons law applies to everything... but it seems that popular music is crap. I don't blame the "utes" for this, I blame the people pushing it. Musicians with skill and talent tend to have brains that get their own ideas, want a fair slice of the earnings, may even start performing without a label. However if you can churn out a steady stream of talentless pop/rap/electronic crap via autotune then the publishers ultimately control the "creators" and when they also decide what is popular by controlling what gets played its easy to turn any dross into a chart topper.

      Back in the 60's, the biggest complaint was that certain popular bands like The Monkeys didn't write their own songs. Now days it doesn't even factor into it (it took 17 people to write Justin Bieber's "Baby") In the 90's we complained that certain artists like Kylie Minogue mimed their concerts, now that is accepted as the "artists" own voice cant match what has been autotuned out as a recording. I think there is a lot of evidence for the notion that music has gotten considerably worse over the years.

      Thou shalt henceforth vacate my greenery.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. Funny by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Funny, you forgot to quote this:

    The hackers, calling themselves Prosox and Kuroi'sh, had written "Free Palestine" underneath the videos.

    1. Re:Funny by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny, you forgot to quote[...]

      It's quite astonishing what some people will do to prevent anyone hearing their story.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Funny by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm, does that mean that the summary is biased against the Palestinians for suppressing the message or does that mean that the summary is biased for the Palestinians and against the Israelis by not mentioning that the hackers are spreading their message by damaging popular websites 100% unrelated to the conflict in question? Why not both?

    3. Re:Funny by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Hmm, does that mean that the summary is biased against the Palestinians for suppressing the message or does that mean that the summary is biased for the Palestinians and against the Israelis by not mentioning that the hackers are spreading their message by damaging popular websites 100% unrelated to the conflict in question? Why not both?

      Given that this is /. and it was posted by msmash, I'm thinking the latter.

    4. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, you forgot to quote[...]

      It's quite astonishing what some people will do to prevent anyone hearing their story.

      Like ... by publishing their "story" in the Washington Post? Yeah, what a coverup! :)

      The coverup is shooting someone who is clearly identified as a journalist. Israel does this kind of thing all the time. Hell, when an Israeli soldier was caught on video shooting a wounded and detained Palestinian in the head and was sentenced to a year in prison there were protests because the sentence was too harsh!

    5. Re:Funny by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Probably because people care more about YouTube than Palestine?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Funny by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I probably means that the BBC identified correctly that people care about YouTube while not giving a fuck about either Israel or Palestine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Funny by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of glad it got left out. There's far too much effort to drag politics into stories when there's plenty to discuss about the hacking itself. Also, I'd argue that by focusing on the perpetrators and their message, you only provide a lot more encouragement for others to do the same to get their message out there. It's the same reason that news stations are discouraged from showing and endlessly discussing the perpetrator in mass shootings or terror attacks because it is believe to encourage others to do it.

      Who cares if the assholes that did it are Palestinian assholes, white nationalist assholes, Islamist assholes, Antifa assholes, etc.? Doesn't really change the fact that they're assholes and shouldn't be given publicity for being dicks.

    8. Re:Funny by tinkerton · · Score: 2

      That is mildly ironic because in general any mention of 'Palestine' is considered reason enough to delete a video. Or a twitter or facebook account.

    9. Re:Funny by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dial down your off-topic antisemitic propaganda. The guy wasn't killed to prevent people from hearing a story, he was killed because he was in the middle of a violent riot.

      Being opposed to the deliberate murder of journalists is not antisemitic. Being opposed to the silencing of the people of Palestine is not antisemitic. Pointing out that the nation of Israel is using many of the tactics of Nazi Germany is not antisemitic. Pointing out that Slashdot buried probably the most important fact of the story is not antisemitic.

      If and when I start ranting about how "the Jews" are doing this or that, start pointing your accusatory finger. If I start frothing about how "the Zionist Conspiracy" is running Hollywood, you can point and laugh.

      My views on the subject are summed up in this informative documentary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Funny by Hentes · · Score: 1

      They just hacked the second largest site on the web, I don't think they need an obscure tech forum to spread their propaganda. And if this drives islamists towards vandalism instead of murder, that's an improvement.

    11. Re: Funny by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      So Jon Stewart is an anti-Semite?

    12. Re: Funny by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, opposing the state of Israel is anti-semitic just like opposing Islam is anti-muslim. It is a matter of perspective.

      Opposing Islam is anti-muslim the definition of muslim is follower of Islam, but the definition of semite is not "living in Israel"; semitic is equivalent to hispanic in that it refers to people who speak any of a group of languages. The modern state of Israel is an artificial creation imagined by the British and implemented by America, and we continue to fund its activities via our foreign aid program. Therefore, we have a stake in (and shared responsibility for) their activities. Our tax dollars are murdering journalists and working inexorably towards another genocide, and I for one take exception to that. I oppose it when we do it directly, and I oppose it when we do it by proxy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Funny by Cederic · · Score: 1

      What the fuck makes you think 'Free Palestine' has anything to do with religion?

      I'm an atheist and I greatly dislike Israel's illegal occupations.

    14. Re: Funny by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No, it's not.

      It's perfectly reasonable to dislike followers of the Jewish faith for their racism and child mutilation, but that's got fuck all to do with the multi-faith nation of Israel, which has plenty of non-religious reasons to despise and/or admire.

    15. Re: Funny by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Because they are civilians, you fucking psychopath. There's always been a difference fighting military vs civilians. The ones fighting in wars know that.

    16. Re: Funny by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you're marching along with the soldiers, fighting alongside them, claiming to be a civilian shouldn't mean much. Journalists do however have special provision in many treaties that they will not be considered unlawful combatants or spies, even though they aren't in uniform, which seems right to me.

      There's always been a difference fighting military vs civilians.

      You'd be surprised how rare it is in practice that armies care, laudable as it might be as an ideal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re: Funny by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The entire premise of Israel existing and having exclusive access to holy sites is based on a theological promise, same for Palestine but for a different party. Opposing the State of Israel, both in the State of Israel and among religious jews abroad is considered blasphemy and to them it is tantamount to holocaust denial. Israel is a semi-theocracy, it is certainly not a democracy and its modern policies and actions are based on (their) holy scripture rather than reason.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    18. Re: Funny by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Religious idiots expecting specific things about Israel does not prevent critique of the state as a secular entity, whether its motives are driven through economic, ideological or theocratic influences.

      When I criticise Israel I do so knowing that many of its citizens are not Jewish.

    19. Re:Funny by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The hackers, calling themselves Prosox and Kuroi'sh, had written "Free Palestine" underneath

      Underneath that, somebody else wrote "With every 10 gallons".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Security hack or auto-removals due to DMCA? by houghi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would not be surprised if somebody had found a way to abuse the auto-removal of music. Perhaps enough complaints and they even remove those.
    We know that Youtube has been blocking movies and sites without reviewing complaints or at least demonitized them. Thsi is how that works:
    People put up a video of their own making with their own content. Somebody complaints and the content is (temporarily) demonitized till the maker notices and complaints. It will then be reversed.
    The problem is that most videos will make the most money in the beginning. All those subscribers will look at the video and you will not get any money from them.

    Then there are the videos that are auto-blocked because somebody send in that it was copyrighted without any proof whatsoever.

    Could be either that or they pissed off enough people and now one is pissing back. That would be better news than them being hacked. How could they be hacked? Perhaps there finally was a person who was able to solve the Captcha questions correctly.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Security hack or auto-removals due to DMCA? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I just don't get why when a video is under investigation they can hold onto the payments for the views, then if found innocent they just pay them back. If guilty then the payments go to the proper copyright holder.
      I would also like to go further where the person putting in the complaint found to be false should pay the fair use compensation for their troubles.

      YouTube demonitization method is Guilty until proven innocent, and you are punished while guilty.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Security hack or auto-removals due to DMCA? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Being paid by youtube is not some sort of natural right -- you're working for them, so you play by their rules and procedures if you want to work for them. Youtube themselves lose money by demonetizing videos, so it seems rather uncharacteristically praiseworthy of them to stop showing ads when they're not sure if they should be monetizing something.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  5. Rick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What about Rick Astley?

  6. Call Me, Selena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Give me a call if you need some help getting through this tough time.

    1. Re:Call Me, Selena by lucm · · Score: 1

      Give me a call if you need some help getting through this tough time.

      Really? From that list of celebs that's the one you creep on?

      You must be one of those people who like the wrong girl in t.a.t.u or in wilson phillips.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  7. Re:When conservatives get screwed with by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Welcome to America where the opinion of someone whose only redeeming feature are a pair of nice tits and the ability to be autotuned to sound tolerable is actually considered important.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Script-Kiddies by electroblood · · Score: 1

    Since when are script-kiddies news?

  9. Re:Empach TRUMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Someone hasn't had their covfefe yet.

  10. wrong girl? by DrYak · · Score: 2

    I find your concept that there could be "a wrong girl" intriguing.

    whatever floats your boat, dude.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  11. Probably hacked the record label, not YouTube. by pikine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the pattern of the damage, those YouTube channels belonging to DJ Snake, Drake, Katy Perry, etc. probably are managed by the same record label marketing person. They probably just hacked into the computer managing these channels while the accounts are still logged in. Everything they did for the damage are something that channel owners could do: changing cover picture, video description, deletion. The actual video content itself hasn't been changed, which is exactly what content creators can't do to their videos, despite it being a popular request.

    If they had really hacked YouTube, they may have been able to replace the video if they could pull it off, but since the videos are divided into chunks and aggressively cached by the CDN (as the videos are served over MPEG-DASH), they will probably get very mixed result at best with some chunks from the old video mixed with chunks from the new video.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:Probably hacked the record label, not YouTube. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If you hacked Youtube, the most likely option would be to call whatever API they used to upload a video. Use Google's systems against itself.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  12. I must be missing something by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    Examples cited in summary seems to me we're not missing much but maybe that's me as I'm not familiar with many of these names. I think there are plenty other options to get videos of today's major stars. It is the older ones (i.e. Connie Francis, Julie London) no longer on the Top 40 list (if there is such a thing these days) that would be a shame if that footage becomes lost.

    Besides music there are many other interesting videos like techie stuff on how to implement various stuff, interesting documentary clips no longer shown on television both OTA and CATV. If this stuff goes, then it's back to old days of swapping VHS tapes.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  13. Is "altered with" a thing? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I don't think I've heard that expression before... what's the difference between that and "tampered with"?

  14. Re:altered with? by lgw · · Score: 1

    The display of poor language skills is horrifying. Could Slashdot please find editors with the ability to briefly appear to be people of normal intellect and capability?

    You must be new here!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  15. And yet *I* get that strange look by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    And yet I get that strange look when I say You sound like a broken record

    Just get off my lawn.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  16. Re:Go back to Voat. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    How did you not just do that? Do you truly think that blaming Israel is truly different from blaming "the Jews"?

    Of course it is. There are plenty of anti-Zionist Jews, and even more non-Zionist ones. You don't even know that?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"