Slashdot Mirror


World's First Electrified Road For Charging Vehicles Opens In Sweden (theguardian.com)

A 1.2-mile stretch of road with electric rails has been installed in Stockholm, Sweden, allowing electric vehicles to charge up their batteries as they drive across it. "The technology behind the electrification of the road linking Stockholm Arlanda airport to a logistics site outside the capital city aims to solve the thorny problems of keeping electric vehicles charged, and the manufacture of their batteries affordable," reports The Guardian. From the report: Energy is transferred from two tracks of rail in the road via a movable arm attached to the bottom of a vehicle. The design is not dissimilar to that of a Scalextric track, although should the vehicle overtake, the arm is automatically disconnected. The electrified road is divided into 50m sections, with an individual section powered only when a vehicle is above it. When a vehicle stops, the current is disconnected. The system is able to calculate the vehicle's energy consumption, which enables electricity costs to be debited per vehicle and user. The "dynamic charging" -- as opposed to the use of roadside charging posts -- means the vehicle's batteries can be smaller, along with their manufacturing costs. A former diesel-fuelled truck owned by the logistics firm, PostNord, is the first to use the road.

102 comments

  1. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet pedestrians are in for a "shock" ...

    1. Re:Wow. by Zumbs · · Score: 4, Informative
      From TFA:

      Säll said: “There is no electricity on the surface. There are two tracks, just like an outlet in the wall. Five or six centimetres down is where the electricity is. But if you flood the road with salt water then we have found that the electricity level at the surface is just one volt. You could walk on it barefoot.”

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    2. Re: Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has the height of pedestrians got to do this this story???

    3. Re: Wow. by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      Presumably you could lie down on it naked, too... as long as it's really cold outside.

    4. Re:Wow. by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      it doesn't really say how they intend to bill , other than "can be debited per vehicle and user", so i put on my robe and fake black hat and ask myself , how long before people start getting bills on their id while they have never been there, because i'm sure its unhackable and despite it being a supreme initiative, the amount of backpatting on we're actually doing something here will probably keep the blind spots hidden ...

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. 1.2 miles of road? by mark_reh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?

    1. Re:1.2 miles of road? by skids · · Score: 1

      Oh don't worry, gasoline producers already have a competing solution.

    2. Re:1.2 miles of road? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A pantograph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... so whats the max that can be pushed back up into the vehicle?
      What can a really good battery take given the average speed and the length of the electric rail down the road?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:1.2 miles of road? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, when you pull out from that close up shot, it looks like this: http://www.newmodellersshop.co... ;)

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    4. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?

      Also, the very first fax machine was a completely useless product, since there was nobody to send faxes to or receive faxes from. I don't know why they even bothered to manufacture it.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trucks goes back and forth between the logistics centre and airport day in and day out. As long as the energy gained is close to the energy cost of driving the stretch then it's all good.

      Also it's basically a test track, just used for an actual job. It's probably rather worthless if you make an honest budget and discard any scientific information gained.

    6. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing you skipped the bit in the article that says that it's a trial and they're planning to role it out across the country.

    7. Re:1.2 miles of road? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That seems unlikely even

      "When a vehicle stops, the current is disconnected."

      This leads me to believe it is a proof of concept, and not a charger. The idea is that cars would use the power instead of batteries, and not charge off of it. Eventually, long haul roads would be powered like this and batteries would only need to cover what ever the automobile equivalent of last mile is (last ten miles I guess ?).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:1.2 miles of road? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's a test track. To be useful it would have to be deployed on over longer distances.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?

      Since we are going to nitpick like autistic retards, the source says it is 'about' 2 km.
      It could be anywhere between 0.9 and 1.6 miles.

    10. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      "Opportunity charging" is nothing new but it's been mostly used for public transport (collectors at bus stops). How long does a bus stop at a bus stop?

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    11. Re: 1.2 miles of road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes using miles is retared

    12. Re:1.2 miles of road? by sad_ · · Score: 1

      i think this is a great idea, but as you said, the distance is too short.
      but what if you would put those chargerroads in highly congested places?
      instead of 5 minutes, it would take 30, 40 or even more minutes to cross and that should be plenty of time to charge the batts to a reasonable level.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    13. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Driving 1.2 miles might take 5 minutes, maximum. How much power can they possibly transfer to the vehicle battery in that time?

      Meanwhile, there are all kinds of places where cars are parked that would make much better charging sites. Spending millions of dollars a mile - okay, okay, Euros per kilometer - for a charging road is the ultimate in dead end projects.

    14. Re:1.2 miles of road? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      This leads me to believe it is a proof of concept, and not a charger. The idea is that cars would use the power instead of batteries, and not charge off of it.

      Really? TFA leads me to believe you might be incorrect:

      Headline: World's first electrified road for charging vehicles opens in SwedenWorld's first electrified road for charging vehicles opens in Sweden

      Sub-head: Stretch of road outside Stockholm transfers energy from two tracks of rail in the road, recharging the batteries of electric cars and trucks

      First sentence: The world’s first electrified road that recharges the batteries of cars and trucks driving on it has been opened in Sweden.

    15. Re:1.2 miles of road? by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      How long does a bus stop at a bus stop?

      About 20 seconds on average?

      From what I've seen (could be wrong), the buses that recharge shortly at every stop (or every third or fourth stop) use supercapacitors that can be charged very quickly. The buses with batteries recharge for a longer time at fewer locations where the bus holds for several minutes, or more (e.g. places where the driver takes a break, or end-points of a line).

    16. Re:1.2 miles of road? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      Why does it not charge stopped cars then?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re:1.2 miles of road? by hawk · · Score: 1

      actually, the first faxes were at the telco center, not to user machines.

      Not very big, either (4"? I forget).

      And expensive per transmission.

      hawk

    18. Re:1.2 miles of road? by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, maybe to keep people from stopping their vehicles to let them charge and blocking the lane.

    19. Re:1.2 miles of road? by tsqr · · Score: 2

      Fair enough.

      Why does it not charge stopped cars then?

      TFA didn't explain that design decision. Since I have to guess, I'm going to go with, "The number of cars the system would have to charge if traffic were bumper-to-bumper and stopped or barely moving (e.g., Los Angeles' I405 during rush hour) would exceed the power delivery of the system."

      Your original post mentioned covering the last mile. TFA covered something very similar -- the long-term plan is to electrify highways, but not local roads. I believe they said the average distance between highways is something like 25km, so the time spent on the highway should supply enough charge to cover that distance.

    20. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough.

      Why does it not charge stopped cars then?

      Because if they charged stopped cars then the headline would have to read "World's first electrified parking lot for charging vehicles opens in Sweden"

    21. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Socguy · · Score: 1

      How much charge can you get in 5 minutes? Depends on the charge rate your vehicle can accept and in what state of discharge you pack is in. At peak, 5 minutes at a Tesla supercharger can add about 40 miles of range to your vehicle. If this stretch of road is located on the up incline of a hill, then you also get to nearly double that through regeneration on the way down the other side. I don't know what kind of rate the trucks will be able to pull through this system but even half that would be fantastic.

    22. Re:1.2 miles of road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, Mr Pedantic. You knew what he was talking about.

  3. From below is easier ,,, by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    Energy is transferred from two tracks of rail in the road via a movable arm attached to the bottom of a vehicle.

    ... than transferring the energy from above.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:From below is easier ,,, by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Below may be easier in ideal conditions. But in real-life conditions, above is easier because crud doesn't build up, and things traveling on the road don't hit the transfer mechanism.

    2. Re:From below is easier ,,, by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "... crud doesn't build up"

      Quit being pragmatic. We're talking The Guardian here.

      Also, unlike overhead wires, this sounds like maintenance nightmare.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  4. 1.2-"mile" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Very exclusive and isolationist...

  5. save on cost of batteries by nonBORG · · Score: 0

    Battery savings $2000
    Extra cost for road $200 Million

    Also lasts until they have to repair the road, then I am guess the road will be broken and no more charging.
    I also guess that all the cheap skates trying to maximize their "free" charge time will go so slow that the road will be impassable almost.

    --
    You can't handle the truth! - Because I don't post left all my comments get modded down, bye bye Karma.
    1. Re:save on cost of batteries by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The network effect in action. The more EVs you have, the more useful such roads will be.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re: save on cost of batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: the more EVs with tiny batteries and this proprietary charging arm...

      Yeah, it's DOA.

    3. Re: save on cost of batteries by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason Nikola Tesla's Wardencliffe Tower research was shut down... funding was cut because the financiers couldn't charge for electricity transmitted wirelessly. FWIW, High voltage lines actually have enough voltage that a drone can fly close enough to charge wirelessly.

    4. Re: save on cost of batteries by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "Tiny batteries" could easily mean, say, 100 km in Sweden. The minimum acceptable range is dependent on the maximum distance between two electrified stretches of the road network. And again, adoption of this is likely to follow a sigmoid curve.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re: save on cost of batteries by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      You didn't even read the summary, let alone the article. Individual drivers will be billed by the system. No freeloaders.

    6. Re: save on cost of batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s an electrical buss, which means power is present for anyone on the buss once energized. Billing works only if your vehicle has an operational transponder / ID setup. Detecting theft will require sophisticated methods watching all users, energy consumption, and flagging unconnected vehicles that may be parasites. Stealing a bit here and there without getting caught would be straightforward for anyone willing to tinker.

    7. Re:save on cost of batteries by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Does traffic patterns never change over there? In San Antonio lanes are often rebuilt as population changes.

      Does the section break if there is road damage? And how big is that section?

    8. Re: save on cost of batteries by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      How? Like a toll road?

    9. Re:save on cost of batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really.

      First of all, this is a test track, going to the airport. Airports are generally not known to move about very frequently.

      Secondly, Sweden is a pretty small nation, about 10 million inhabitants. It helps keeping problems small.

      Thirdly, most of the country that isn't just out in the sticks, are already largely built around working mass-transit systems with an extensive railway-system and bus network.

      So, yeah, patterns do change, but generally pretty slowly, and with few exceptions, the stresses on the system tends to be not too great. The biggest problems being every idiot who thinks he's hot shit moving to Stockholm, which is struggling to deal with it and politicians who thinks building more roads so you can make room for more cars is the way to solve the problem. Presumably the problem formulated is how to get even more traffic, so they have to build more roads. But I digress.

  6. Re:Made in America? LOL by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    These days, about the only jaw-dropping tech coming out of the America

    This is not "jaw-dropping tech" except in its stupidity.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  7. Jay Walkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that jay walkers will be electrocuted?

    1. Re:Jay Walkers by blindseer · · Score: 2

      Does this mean that jay walkers will be electrocuted?

      Yes. Of course.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Jay Walkers by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Jay-walkers? Are they not allowed to cross that section of road?

    3. Re: Jay Walkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a motorway...

  8. Re: Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A money grab of European proportions to build a parking lot.

  9. That is Dumb by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    Why would you put track that the vehicle has to connect to? It will wear out and you have to line it up and connect. Ever hear of wireless charging??? Duh. They could have done this in a much much better way. Make it wireless charging!

    1. Re:That is Dumb by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      That only works if it is taxpayer funded. Perform a seance and ask the ghost of Nikola Tesla why.

    2. Re:That is Dumb by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      Duh. They could have done this in a much much better way. Make it wireless charging!

      Depends how you define "better". Wireless charging is usually much less efficient.

    3. Re:That is Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wireless charging is usually much less efficient." It may be inefficient now but as research continues can wireless charging become more efficient? Building roads to charge cars may work and even be feasible in a country like Sweden but that type of doesn't scale at all for larger and more populous countries. Just like all the novel socio-economic ideas the Nordic countries are famous for do not scale when talking about the countries that drive the worlds economy.

    4. Re:That is Dumb by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Depends how you define "better". Wireless charging is usually much less efficient.

      What is worse, somewhat more inefficient, or not working at all?

      What happens as soon as a bit of road debris is left to accumulate in the tracks, which causes the vehicle contact to become damaged and disfunctional? At least a large inductive coil buried under asphalt would be protected and not require moving parts.

    5. Re:That is Dumb by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      What is worse, somewhat more inefficient, or not working at all?

      What happens as soon as a bit of road debris is left to accumulate in the tracks, which causes the vehicle contact to become damaged and disfunctional? At least a large inductive coil buried under asphalt would be protected and not require moving parts.

      Well, this is a test track, so we will see how it works. Personally, I'm skeptical. That doesn't mean that wireless charging is the answer, though.

      Despite all of the brou-ha-ha and countless research into wireless charging, most things that charge (and especially moving things like streetcars, trains, and trolleybuses) do so via physical contact. There are reasons why this is so.

    6. Re:That is Dumb by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      They claim that it's self-cleaning and also that they have a special cleaning vehicle if there is more debris than the automatic system can handle. However time will tell, this is a 2 year project to see how well the technology works in real world scenarios (they have run an internal test track for 5 years already).

    7. Re:That is Dumb by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Doesn't mean that wireless charging isn't the best tradeoff between convenience and functionality and reliability, either. Sometimes even the most simple and direct solution turns out to be more complicated, as I'm sure this test track will soon demonstrate.

      Wireless brou-ha-ha... I hope you wrote that from a mobile device. :)

    8. Re:That is Dumb by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      So even more moving parts, which can be affected by freezing conditions and electrolysis.

      This is turning out to be a really amazing system.

    9. Re:That is Dumb by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      I don't think that this is really something that the designers have missed since it's built in a country with snow and rain in the majority of the seasons. And their first test track have withstood 5 winters so far.

  10. 1.2 miles down a Califorinan Freeway by aberglas · · Score: 2

    Could take an hour or more...

  11. Streetcar tech by Tavor · · Score: 1

    This is actually really REALLY old technology. Streetcars used this at the dawn of American cities, and I'm somewhat curious if having a dual-use (Streetcar and electric automobile) network could propel a faster switch from IC engines and towards better public transit in one fell swoop. While the idea of trolleys and streetcars using overhead wiring is more common, plenty of US cities used in-road electric rails (most notably Washington DC see links) http://www.rypn.org/forums/vie... https://www.dcpreservation.org...

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
  12. Re:Made in America? LOL by hyades1 · · Score: 0

    Go fuck yourself with a broken bottle, you AC POS.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  13. Re:Made in America? LOL by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    You obviously don't know what "jaw-dropping" means. I'll explain: It means off-the-wall. Mind boggling. Crazy. Something jaw-dropping might be world changing, or it might be headed at Mach 3 for the scrap pile of failed ideas.

    The point, which you missed, is that there was a time when anything like that probably originated in the United States. If it failed, the next potentially world changing idea would be coming along in prototype form a week later. The US used to be a hotbed of innovation and new takes on old ideas. Americans dared. Failure on one front just meant it was time to push harder on another.

    Now most of what I see coming out of the US is metathesiophobic drivel from a bunch of hidebound, frightened old men who don't give a crap about anything but the bottom line of corporations that are screwing them without mercy.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  14. One of two in Sweden by iktos · · Score: 4, Informative

    The first one was built a bit further north and uses a dual overhead catenary and has a counterpart in a warmer climate in USA.
    Both built to test how the technologies will work in practical conditions.
    https://www.trafikverket.se/en...

    1. Re:One of two in Sweden by SandorZoo · · Score: 2

      Siemens have built a pilot of the overhead catenary in Carson, California. They're building another just south of Frankfurt in Germany.

      From the picture it looks like the overhead version will only work with trucks, but the rails embedded in tarmac version will work most vehicles.

  15. Re: Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thatâ(TM)s just the sort of response I would expect from a person whose post history shows clear signs of mental illness. Itâ(TM)s lucky for you that slashdot exists because in the real world nobody would bother listening to you.

  16. Re:Made in America? LOL by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    People need to stop voting for those candidates who are supported by people with a strong financial interest in existing technology, such as the Koch Brothers.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  17. Re:Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweden doesn't have any car companies anyway, just a few shell companies owned by Chinese investors trying to shrug off shoddy Chinese wares as Old-World luxury.

    First of all, Sweden does still have car companies remaining under Swedish ownership, such as Koenigsegg Automotive AB. It's true that Saab and Volvo cars are now Chinese (although Volvo Cars still does R&D in Sweden). But the story is more about lorries, and AB Volvo manufactures lorries, construction equipment and the like (Saab Scania is owned by the Germans).

  18. Re:Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, I thought the point of Russian trolling was to make people think they weren't Russian trolls. Maybe it's counterpropaganda?

  19. Re:Made in America? LOL by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

    The point, which you missed, is that there was a time when anything like that probably originated in the United States. If it failed, the next potentially world changing idea would be coming along in prototype form a week later. The US used to be a hotbed of innovation and new takes on old ideas. Americans dared.

    You mean immigrants to America. America was a hotbed of innovation not because of anything other than America was a relatively safe place for smart people to migrate to in turbulent times. Those days are mostly over but ironically the common man believes that the path back to greatness is by persecuting immigrants.

  20. Re: Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have certainly been times when the US produced more innovation than it does today, but there was never a time when any sane person would have assumed any new invention to come out of that country.

  21. Old technology is new again by technosaurus · · Score: 1

    Electric cars and Trams (or cars operating like them), Nickel-Iron Batteries, wooden high-rises, hyperloop (New York City still has remnants of the pneumatic tube network), natural plastics. Blacksmithing is even seeing a resurgence... What's next? Wood gasifiers, Lye soap, Roman concrete, shipping by sail, cars with sails, horse and buggy, derigibles, the rest of Nikola Tesla's patent portfolio? What about medicine, modern medicine allowed us to forget treatments that may have worked OK - for example the discovery of antibiotics virtually stopped all research into other treatments that may be valid now that we have created so many antibiotic resistant strains. What else should we bring back?

    1. Re:Old technology is new again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else should we bring back?

      Intelligent debate rather than the current trend of simply insulting others.
      Allowing people to fail in school, rather than devaluing each year of education to the point where public schooling in the US has become little more than extended daycare so the disinterested parents can both have jobs undisturbed.
      The expectation of single-earner families, instead of the current war to devalue the people who actually bring wealth to their employer.
      Basic respect for the lives and decisions of others.

      There's a lot more to the list, but I have reason to step away from this post.

  22. And now we just need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Solar freaking roadways to make this system into a truley worthless money pit.

  23. Re:Made in America? LOL by technosaurus · · Score: 1

    America pioneered this about a century ago and abandoned it several decades ago ... Technically the automobile and oil industries bought them out (the electric tram companies) and killed them and replaced them with stinky, polluting buses - it was a real threat to their bottom line that could potentially grow to other cities and make public transportation appealing to the masses.

  24. Re:Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To pick some nits:

    Volvo Cars does more than R&D in Sweden. They have a large fraction of the production here.

    There is no Saab Scania. The two companies Saab AB and Scania AB split in 1995.

  25. Re:Made in America? LOL by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Stupid question, but how is it that gasoline makes busses not appealing to the masses?

    Does electric power somehow keep the junkies from shooting up in the back?

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  26. Electric car ? by Kopp · · Score: 1

    Why are they using an old Peugeot 406 ?

  27. Great idea by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Now when that truck has miscalculated and is almost out of juice, it will go at 2 kmh on that stretch of road to get some meaningful charge...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  28. Re:Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US is full of innovation, but only ones that can be proven to be successful.

    No private company is going to ask the US gov't to tear up the roads to install bullshit electrified rails that no car on the planet can use. I'm sure there are dozens of these bullshit ideas, in diorama form, in every low end Community Collage in the US.

    Its is stupid idea and will go nowhere. The maintenance costs to the roads alone in any state that has rain/snow would be horrendous, or even just cleaning this miles long crack in a road surface.

    Its a good idea if you are an idiot that has never seen the real world.

  29. This is a great idea, but I can improve upon it! by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    This is a great first step, but let's make this at least mostly autonomous. Already autonomous cars are coming, but with the carnage they seem to be leaving on the roadways, what if we could come up with a way to make them more or less idiot-proof?

    This electrifying track is a great first step in making electric cars feasible, but what if we added a couple more of them that could interface with the wheels of the car to keep it moving in exactly the right direction? If there is no ambiguity or variance in the direction of travel, the problem becomes one dimensional and then automating becomes much easier since you only have to worry about the distance to cars in front or behind you.

    Even more, we could really pile on the efficiency if we created some kind of way to couple cars together on the road, so first they don't even have to worry about distance because they're linked together, and second they get the benefit of drafting to increase fuel economy.

    We could even build these "track roads" between major urban centers and even have "commuter" versions of them for more local travel.

    Man, this is getting almost too big to wrap my head around - it seems almost too good to be true because not only is it feasible but I think it really would be much safer and more efficient!

    I need to sit down...

  30. So ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... everyone would drive little individual trolleys? :)

  31. Re: Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a few places in the USA we still have buses that run with electrified overhead lines. The buses can run on diesel when off the electrified overhead lines.

    I think the Sweden setup is impractical for everyday drivers, but for trucks, buses and other large vehicles that are making the same runs over and over it does make sense.

    Keep in mind that making sense does not mean cheaper than fuel. Some cultures actually have a desire to lower air and noise pollution, or to reduce foreign dependence.

  32. Re: Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living in an urban area I can tell you, internal combustion engine buses stink and are noisy.

    We have electric buses near me that run on overhead tracks. They swap the diesel if they lose their overhead connection, which is fortunately rare these days.

    So when we talk about appealing to masses, it is not necessarily the users of the buses that you want to appeal to, it is the neighborhoods full of people that may never use the bus but will fight allowing them nearby due to concerns over noise and air pollution.

  33. I'm only happy when it rains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Road salt + water + high voltage... But I guess that is none of my business.

    1. Re:I'm only happy when it rains. by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      You do realize that this is built in a country where it snows a lot and that their first road have survived 5 snowy winters with out any problems?

  34. Re:Made in America? LOL by stdarg · · Score: 1

    You must be trolling, or confusing government innovation with innovation in general. There is obviously innovation in the American private sector, even if we restrict our view to transportation. Tesla, SpaceX, Hyperloop, Uber/Lyft, self-driving cars in general.

    This is a cool idea. I disagree with those saying this is pointless... the point is they are sharing the energy supply burden rather than making each car keep its own energy supply via batteries. This means an all-electric car doesn't need a 200+ mile range, maybe it needs 50 miles, which would reduce costs quite a bit.

    But you're still crazy if you think there's no innovation in America.

  35. Re:Made in America? LOL by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    He means that this is a "jaw-droppingly stupid" idea. This isn't a "dare", it is a stupid idea that shouldn't have made it past the napkin stage.

  36. Re:Wow man Slashdot is like 5 hours old HN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why why come here? when you can get the news 5 hours earlier?

  37. Re:Made in America? LOL by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    I'm old enough to recall electric street trolleys. All the trolleys I saw used overhead wires. Sometimes the wires were (are?) used with the buses that replaced the trolleys. Subways, of course, did, and do, use electrified "third rails"

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  38. Re:Made in America? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong but it sounds nice

  39. Re: Made in America? LOL by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Some cultures actually have a desire to lower air and noise pollution, or to reduce foreign dependence.

    By constantly running power throughout the road at all times? Guess I may as well leave the lights on in my house when no one is home.

  40. What a horribly stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  41. Re: Made in America? LOL by SamTombs · · Score: 1

    From the Fine Summary:

    "The electrified road is divided into 50m sections, with an individual section powered only when a vehicle is above it. When a vehicle stops, the current is disconnected."

  42. Slot cars for adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it really is adult sized slot cars. Which would be an interesting take on current adult drag racing...