Slashdot Mirror


A Coal Power Plant is Being Reopened For Blockchain Mining (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Sure, you could mine bitcoin on that old PC in your garage, or you could use a whole power station to do it. That's the idea behind the Blockchain Application Centre -- an Aussie tech initiative that will see one of the country's now-shuttered coal-fired power plants reopened to provide cheap power for blockchain applications. It's the work of Australian tech company IOT Group, which has partnered with local power company Hunter Energy on the project. According to The Age, Hunter Energy will recommission the Redbank power station in the Hunter Valley, two hours drive north of Sydney. Once the power plant is reopened (expected to be completed within 12 months), it will offer wholesale or "pre-grid" power prices to blockchain companies, allowing them to do things like mining cryptocurrencies, without having to pay retail power prices.

225 comments

  1. Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So not onlly are we going to waste tons of electricity, we're going to pollute now too.

    1. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So not onlly are we going to waste tons of electricity, we're going to pollute now too.

      It's not about the environment, it's about getting rich.

      It's a shame. When I realized how much electricity was going into cryptocurrency, I sold mine and got out. I had no idea a single crypto mining outfit was using as much electricity as a small town. It's appalling.

    2. Re:Yay Coal Power by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

      So not onlly are we going to waste tons of electricity, we're going to pollute now too.

      Coal is the future. Coal powered power stations, coal powered cars, coal powered politicians. Dissing coal will get you sent to the gulag.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Yay Coal Power by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Next, we’re going to bulldoze the rainforest and plant tulips there.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ask me the only benefit to actually mining ANY crypto currency is only to ensure the sale of power. We are not really seeing any net benefit beside wasting a lot of money of hardware and a lot of money on power consumption. But hey it's new and obviously it will be enough to take down the large banks that have been around since the days of napoleon....

    5. Re:Yay Coal Power by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      And they should be a huge social pressure against them. But the issue is, many crypto mining companies do it where electricity is cheap ... because running on dirty coal.

      Problem is, their companies don't sell anything, they just make money, and those who run this probably don't care much about their image.

    6. Re:Yay Coal Power by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Next, we’re going to bulldoze the rainforest and plant tulips there.

      In the South Seas! Stock in this new venture now available on 5% margin.

    7. Re:Yay Coal Power by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      If you ask me the only benefit to actually mining ANY crypto currency is only to ensure the sale of power. We are not really seeing any net benefit beside wasting a lot of money of hardware and a lot of money on power consumption. But hey it's new and obviously it will be enough to take down the large banks that have been around since the days of napoleon....

      Hmmm. So CC is really a clever creation of BIG POWER! And we are only now catching on....

    8. Re:Yay Coal Power by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Those are all polluting solutions. I prefer coal powered solar panels.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Yay Coal Power by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Coal powered spacecraft.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid burns brightly

    11. Re:Yay Coal Power by lgw · · Score: 1

      So not onlly are we going to waste tons of electricity, we're going to pollute now too.

      A coal plant has nothing on a gold mine. For all that BTC is wasteful, it's still far better than gold (from time to time, the power cost to get 1 ounce of gold exceeds the worth of that gold - ASIC mining is much less wasteful).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re: Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Coal powered spacecraft

      actually, solid propellant booster rockets arent all that far from being a coal powered spacecraft

    13. Re:Yay Coal Power by higuita · · Score: 1

      great, the gulag should be then a nice tropical beach, with all the melted iced and the temperature raised due to the CO2

      --
      Higuita
    14. Re:Yay Coal Power by lgw · · Score: 2

      At least the South Seas scam served a purpose - it was cooked up to refinance government debt, not that different in practice from state lotteries now that I think about it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is quite stupid. I would comprehend if we deploy solar panels to the moon to power this idiotic idea of wasting energy. But I am as a big fan of conspiracy theories would say that:

      1. Since 1990 American invasion into Iraq, lets say "western" businessmen funded and created illegal Oil excavation facilities across Iraq and Syria operated by all sorts of marginals coming across the globe into that area. The most prominent group of them is called ISIS by US news channels, but it does not reflect real picture of variety of those groups in the region.

      2. In order to legalize that theft of resources ($10 a barrel is only possible if oil is stolen) they created a set of Shale oil and Natural Gas companies. These Shale Oil & Gas companies started to publish negative prognoses about confirmed explored oil reserves as soon as Russia started to help Iraq and Syria

      3. When defeat of those groups became obvious and the fact that sooner or later that area would fall under control of some legal government and prices for Oil and Gas would go up, official america decided to kick out Erdogan and spread that mass from Syria and Iraq into Turkey using available vast resources of Kurdish clans populating Syria, Iraq, Iran and Turkey, if we (sorry I pay taxes as you) manage to fuel and start Kurdish independence war we can guarantee another couple of decades of free Oil and Gas or at least keep prices miserably low. I don't not mention that Israel finally will manage to defeat Iran with Kurdish hands without facing possibility of nuclear war..

      4. So basically I wanted to say that in case of accidental spike in electricity prices we have very nice excuse that Bit Coin miners are driving electricity prices up and prices spike on energy has nothing to do with collapse of those facilities in Iraq and Syria.

      Sorry, I see news and facts differently.

    16. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad part is that there is no end, by design. The more people mining bitcoin, the more difficult they will make the computations, the more power will be required, repeat ad infinitum...

    17. Re: Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was cooked up to benefit, aka, profiteer, from national debt refinancing.

      The actual debt management was ostensibly independent, though with all the corruption was actually corrupt itself.

    18. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So not onlly are we going to waste tons of electricity, we're going to pollute now too.

      Tons of electricity? Electricity doesn't weigh anything

    19. Re: Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heavy electrons do!

    20. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me of an old bus I saw in Bangkok. I am pretty sure the soot flying out of its tail-pipe was the reaction mass that allowed it to move...

    21. Re: Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blockchain may well turn out to be the digital equivalent of those gigantic stone heads on Easter Island. You know, the ones they cut down all their trees to make and move, and then had to abandon the island because they needed the trees to live. The thing is, we can't abandon Earth.

    22. Re:Yay Coal Power by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Gold is at least useful in the long term.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    23. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are approximately 1.098e+33 electrons per metric ton.

    24. Re: Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your full of shit. I'm sure you knew exactly how much power they were using after you got your first power bill from mining.

    25. Re: Yay Coal Power by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Someone who's not worth burning up mod points on needs to

      1. Sober up.

      2. Learn to read.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    26. Re:Yay Coal Power by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the coal-fired nuclear reactors!

      I have friends who own coal mines, they say those will work just great! They'll be the BEST coal-fired nuclear reactors!

      MCGC!

      (Make Coal Great for Corps)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    27. Re:Yay Coal Power by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You appear to "see" news and facts pretty much the way I'd expect someone being paid by Erdogan to spread anti-Kurd propaganda to "see" them, no surprises there.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    28. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA? It's pure clickbait because at the end it says that the blockchain power will only account for 5% of the generator's output.

      Basically, the power station is being revived because Australia has a shortage of baseload electricity generation in the last few years and wholesale power prices have skyrocketed from being amongst the cheapest in the world (thanks to coal fired power stations built next to open-cut coal mines).

      The generator is being recommissioned to take advantage of high prices and looming government policy that will mandate that electricity companies have to source a percentage of their electricity from "reliable" generators to ensure that the grid remains stable in the face of increasing amounts of intermittent generation.

      The blockchain group have probably just signed a power purchase agreement (PPA) and got some land set aside at the plant to build a data centre so they can take power straight from the generators rather than via the transmission network, which will probably save them $1-2/MWh. Coal power in Australia is incredibly cheap at under $40/MWh (about USD $30)

    29. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sorry I pay taxes as you"

      The Pentagon spends as it wishes, accumulating unsupported adjustments as much as $21 trillion over a couple decades. If Congress forgets to support the unsupported adjustments with new spending, the Fed still cashes the Pentagon's checks. What Treasury thinks the Pentagon spent differs from what the Pentagon says it spent. Taxpayers are not needed to fund unallocated Pentagon spending; the Fed simply does not bounce the Pentagon's checks.

    30. Re: Yay Coal Power by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      It makes no sense for the US administration to keep oil and gas prices down, as the US gas and oil industry would suffer. As these guys are sitting in the government, they will not harm themselves. And a GOP congress will also not support actions which are against the interest of the oil and gas industry.

    31. Re:Yay Coal Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Coal power in Australia is incredibly cheap at under $40/MWh (about USD $30)"

      In the US, electricity rates have been decoupled from production and maintenance. Electric utilities such as PSE, when you look at their balance sheets, make more from financial investments than from customers. Rate charges are icing on the cake, unnecessary to fund operation and maintenance. Rates are not connected with usage.

      Quoting the aforementioned PSE filing:

      The revenue recorded under the decoupling mechanisms will be affected by customer growth and not actual consumption.

      PSE is a subsidiary of Puget Holdings, LLC. The entire conglomerate of firms makes more than enough money from financial operations, playing with pension fund money and equity while producing electricity way over demand at very low cost.

      Tl;dr: rates have been decoupled from production and distribution costs. Electricity prices are arbitrary.

  2. Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    As soon as they have an opportunity to enrich themselves they suddenly don't care about the environment...

    1. Re:Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      What do your misconceived ideas about the left have to do with bitcoin mining?

    2. Re:Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by supremebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bitcoin seems to be more loved by the Libertarian sect, which doesn't seem to give a damn about environmental causes and thinks that polluting businesses should "self regulate" themselves. Yeah... because that worked so well back in the 1950's and 60's.

    3. Re: Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a drive-by trolling

    4. Re:Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also evident by the drive to replace nuclear plants by gas+renewables. (mostly gas, also some coal: see Germany.) Genuinely concerned and informed environmentalists support nuclear, because it is the source of energy that requires the least raw materials, and has the smallest environmental impact.

      However, greed and ignorance are not limited to the left.

    5. Re:Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the government was so worried about environmental protection in the 1950s and 60s... Biggest and worst polluted areas in the US are government sites where they enriched and refined nuclear weapon stockpiles.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    6. Re:Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your just spouting pure propaganda because you don't understand libertarian philosophy. Libertarians don't believe in the use of violence to achieve social and political objectives. Libertarians make up a diverse group of people. Some are ass-holes and some aren't. Some like me recycle and do have concern for the environment. The question of whether or not regulation in this case is justified is whether or not that pollution is the use of violence against others and it seems obvious to me that it can be argued that it is. Now what you do on your own land or with your own property is your business so long as it doesn't impact other people. If I want to build a house that isn't to code and it collapses thats my problem. If it kills it's my liability. If I drive my car and hit someone and am without insurance because forced insurance itself is an act of violence then its still my liability. NH doesn't mandate insurance and magically we have a higher rate of insured drivers than most other states that require it! Imagine that. When you don't mandate insurance insurance becomes cheap and affordable because insurance companies then have to compete with $0 (that is those who can't afford it can go without, but that means insurance company makes no money, so if they charge too much the people go without and they make less money so they maintain lower prices).

    7. Re:Bitcoin, a Leftist phenomenon by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you Libertards don't want to acknowledge any impact of your actions on others on account of your tendency to indulge in magical "there are boundaries only where they're convenient to me" thinking.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  3. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is so pointless. All that energy, and all those computing resources, for nothing. What the hell is wrong with people?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cryptocurrencies aren't the first time humanity has thrown a fuck-ton of time/energy/resources into something with no societal benefit, and it won't be the last.

    2. Re:Why? by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      That's certainly true... but it was stupid the last time, it's stupid this time, and it'll be stupid next time. What exactly is your point?

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Freeing yourself from the financial shackles of a central economic authority that devalues your currency to nothing and riddle's your economy with debt is hardly "for nothing". Go back to Jerome and ask for a raise.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly is your point?

      That humanity does really stupid things from time to time. I guess that's not obvious to you.

    5. Re:Why? by bungo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I fell the same way about soccer and it's world cup.

      I mean, millions of people watching a small number of men kicking around a ball.

      If only everyone in the world would just do whatever I think is sensible, and stop wasting resources.

      Why the hell do people have the freedom to make their own choices in life?

       

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    6. Re:Why? by lgw · · Score: 1

      This is so pointless. All that energy, and all those computing resources, for nothing. What the hell is wrong with people?

      Hardly a new problem - how else would you describe the pyramids. Well, at least they're cool to look at.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all those computing resources, for nothing.

      What do you think about all the computing resources that VISA uses to keep track of all those purchases? Or Amazon, paypal, all the bank and credit-union websites. All those point-of-sale device. The REAMS of paper used in receipts.

      In short, all the effort used to make a monetary system. Because that's what this is, a system of supporting a means for people to exchange wealth. If that's "nothing", then you've failed basic civilization 101 and you'll never build marketplaces or get to Code of Law.

    8. Re:Why? by klingens · · Score: 2

      It's not totally pointless, at least for the power company. Economically it's great.
      Coal plants are awful in the current fast energy market: if you want to deliver power tomorrow at 11am, you better start firing the boiler now or it won't happen.
      If you however have a always running baseload from the bitcoin mining, you can immediately react to fluctuating power needs by simply turning off the miners, or at least hibernate them. You cannot power up or down a coal power plant in seconds but you can do this with mining rigs.

      It makes the coal plant economically usable as a fast reaction power plant, to deliver when power is in demand and highly priced.
      Ecologically however, it's of course a total catastrophe.

    9. Re:Why? by kenh · · Score: 2

      This is so pointless. All that energy, and all those computing resources, for nothing. What the hell is wrong with people?

      Are you talking about Crypto Currencies or Candy Crush?

      --
      Ken
    10. Re: Why? by prefec2 · · Score: 0

      You do not understand economy. Bitcoin is a limited resource such as gold or diamonds or coral reefs. In case a lot of people want that resource its value (in traded other resources). This does not free the world from speculation and economic collapses, which were all based on speculation of limited resources. No matter it was tulips or overproduction in the 1920s or the crash in 2008 all based on speculation.

  4. God damn it by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God damn it, this fucking insanity has to stop. Not only has it impacted my ability to upgrade to a bitch'n graphics card but now they want to poison the air I breath for this shit?

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:God damn it by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to say that I am disgusted by this.
      We really need to stop ALL new coal plants, or re-openings, from occurring. That should include ALL NATIONS.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      God damn it, I love unfettered capitalism. The way you can make gobs of money, and the way it makes lefties foam at the mouth.

    3. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, Brother! Well said. Well said.

    4. Re:God damn it by indy · · Score: 2

      There is two ways out of this. One is Bitcoin depreciating substantially, making mining less profitable. The other is having an alternative market for compute power that pays better. Projects such as Golem and (this author's very own) BitWrk are trying to achieve this.

    5. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "money"

    6. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn it, this fucking insanity has to stop....

      God evidently doesn't get involved in until the afterlife, meanwhile we all have to live with the consequences of greed.

      Perhaps if just more people stopped being so greedy?

    7. Re:God damn it by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps more cryptocurrencies should be based on other concepts, like proof-of-storage, rather than proof-of-work. Proof-of-storage would be useful, as it would likely drive down the price of SSDs, benefiting everyone, in the long term.

    8. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you think the reactions to this are based on left/right leanings, you may need to check your inner humanity. Polluting the every loving hell out of the Earth because you see a get-rich-quick scheme in front of you should be something we all mock, mercilessly, for the idiotic benchmark of greed mixed with stupidity that it is. I have to believe that anyone that doesn't understand that is lacking a fundamental ability to think through consequences.

    9. Re:God damn it by quantaman · · Score: 1

      There is two ways out of this. One is Bitcoin depreciating substantially, making mining less profitable. The other is having an alternative market for compute power that pays better. Projects such as Golem and (this author's very own) BitWrk are trying to achieve this.

      The two big problems with Bitcoin are the enabling of illegal activity and the high use of energy by miners.

      While having an alternative market means that computing power is being used for something more productive it doesn't actually fix either problem.

      Whether a Bitcoin is worth $0.01 or $1,000,000 you can transfer $10k in Bitcoin for money laundering or a mob hit just as easily.

      And an alternative market that pays better doesn't actually save any power, people will just turn from large-scale mining into large-scale participation in those markets, and if those markets pay better they actually use more power.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    10. Re:God damn it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      poison the air I breath for this shit

      Nope, just the air of her majesty's former criminals. ;-)

    11. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public health doesn't factor into the cost-benefit calculation used by most corporations, except to the extent that someone could win in a lawsuit. As long as the damages are distant in both time and distance from the actions of the offender, the threat of a successful lawsuit is fleeting.

    12. Re:God damn it by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0

      We really need to stop ALL new coal plants, or re-openings, from occurring. That should include ALL NATIONS.

      I'll bite - how?

      Are you suggesting that (re)opening a coal plant be considered an act of war? If so, do you support the notion of bombing the crap out of any nation that tries to (re)open a coal plant? Good luck with convincing anyone that bombing someone far away is a good solution to pollution or AGW...

      Or do you just want a treaty signed by every nation on the planet? So far, there have been two treaties that were universally signed/ratified, only one of which actually requires signatories to do anything. Good luck with that, too.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:God damn it by indy · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between power for mining and power employed for a useful purpose.

    14. Re:God damn it by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Are not coal plants heavily regulated for filters? It may release more CO2, but that isn't "polluting the hell" out of anything.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:God damn it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Like altcoin mining has driven down the price of GPUs?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:God damn it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      He just identified the 'useful purpose', evading government controls.

      If there is no mining there can be no transactions. The bad (power use for mining) has to happen to enable the good ('enabling of illegal activity' in the GP's parlance).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re:God damn it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are not coal plants heavily regulated for filters? It may release more CO2, but that isn't "polluting the hell" out of anything.

      Today's filters do a good job of straining out particulates, but you still have gases. Not just the ever-popular CO2, but NOx and SO2, the stuff that creates smog in the Grand Canyon from Arizona's last remaining coal plant.

    18. Re: God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the power wasted on Slashdot?
      Careful with the moral bullshit because it will be turned against you.

    19. Re:God damn it by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      By this rubric, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and identity theft all have useful purposes.

    20. Re:God damn it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Because an "alternative market for compute power that pays better" would just make even more money for this coal plant, I have a better idea: put the NSA to work on breaking the Bitcoin system itself, either the mining part or the blockchain part, to crash its value. Let mobsters kill each other over their suddenly emptied stores of value while millions of GPUs suddenly become available for cheap.

    21. Re:God damn it by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Proof-of-storage would be useful, as it would likely drive down the price of SSDs, benefiting everyone, in the long term.

      I think you missed the concept of supply and demand. If you increase the demand, the price goes up.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    22. Re:God damn it by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with greed. It's how shit gets done.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    23. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the filters are implemented, you remove particulates. You do not remove all harmful substances.

      It remains to be seen if this power-up, which seems focused mostly on creating power as cheaply as possible, rather than as cleanly as possible, will implement current modern spec filters.

    24. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, right? It's high time to remove greed from the list of deadly sins. I'm sure Trump's on it.

    25. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A laudable goal, which can only be achieved with clean energy cheaper fossil. Rich nations pouring subsidies into renewables following the example of Germany, only end up with very costly energy and still can't close coal. (40% coal now; also see their neighbors for how decarbonization can be done right.)

      For the developing world where most growth is occurring, clean energy needs to be genuinely cheaper than fossil without any subsidy.

    26. Re:God damn it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Certainly money laundering does.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    27. Re:God damn it by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      There have been scrubbers for that for almost a century.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    28. Re:God damn it by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      no, just tax the import from their nation. Simple as that.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    29. Re:God damn it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Wind is already cheaper than coal. Of course, it is not good for all areas. But, a good example is Pakistan. China has now convinced pakistan to buy china's horrible coal, and in return, china will install several coal plants at costs. Bear in mind that pakistan does not have coal plants because they have no coal. So, china is getting others to burn their coal. INSANE.
      We should be encouraging Pakistan to go to wind, solar, and yes, nuclear. If we are going to cut the CO2, we have to have all nations in on it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    30. Re: God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I take that back, I did a bit of research and realised wind power is actually cheaper than coal now.

    31. Re:God damn it by flink · · Score: 1

      Proof-of-storage would be useful, as it would likely drive down the price of SSDs, benefiting everyone, in the long term.

      I think you missed the concept of supply and demand. If you increase the demand, the price goes up.

      It depends on the type of good. If something requires a high initial capital expenditure to start producing, but has a low marginal cost to manufacture, then having a higher demand can lower cost because the the manufacturer can spread the cost over more consumers.

    32. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite - how?

      Three words motherfucker: "Muon Catalyzed Fusion".

      Are you suggesting that (re)opening a coal plant be considered an act of war?

      No plants made of coal are known to exist. Even if it were considered an act of war nobody would be able to commit it.

      If so, do you support the notion of bombing the crap out of any nation that tries to (re)open a coal plant?

      Hypothetically speaking it may be worth considering. See below.

      Good luck with convincing anyone that bombing someone far away is a good solution to pollution or AGW

      Global thermonuclear war can significantly lower global temperatures for decades.

      Or do you just want a treaty signed by every nation on the planet?

      I want a global treaty banning use of Fel.

      https://wow.gamepedia.com/Fel

    33. Re:God damn it by magarity · · Score: 1

      No plants made of coal are known to exist.

      And yet all coal are made of plants!

    34. Re:God damn it by kenh · · Score: 1

      just tax the import from their nation

      Yay! A trade war! why that is the very definition of a win-win situation, that never works out badly for anyone.

      --
      Ken
    35. Re:God damn it by kenh · · Score: 1

      What does your desire for Pakistan to open a wind farm have to do with a plan to re-open an existing coal plant in Australia to exclusively power bitcoin miners?

      --
      Ken
    36. Re:God damn it by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Great news for China.
      Sell their coal. Sell their coal plants. Sell the spare parts. Have their experts on site. Let other nations see what inviting in China can offer a nation.
      Pakistan gets a power network for its military industrial complex.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    37. Re:God damn it by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      myh "inner humanity" tells me use of fossil fuels has lengthened human lifespan, cured terrible diseases, improved quality of life, and uplifts nations out of poverty and starvation.

      So you would take that away from people.

      You fiend.

    38. Re:God damn it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      nope. Most is from plankton ( which is mostly prokaryotic ) and some are from animals.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    39. Re: God damn it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      not all places. There are plenty of areas in which wind is not the right way to go.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    40. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be something we all detest, but you know damned well that one sect of country thinks it's A-OK and the other sect thinks it's not. You also know that corresponds quite well with political party. I believe your namby pamby can't we all get along bullshit diatribe up there is simple obfuscation and false elquivolence. Republicans simply don't give one half a shit about the environment if there is no profit in it.

    41. Re:God damn it by dj245 · · Score: 1

      God damn it, this fucking insanity has to stop. Not only has it impacted my ability to upgrade to a bitch'n graphics card but now they want to poison the air I breath for this shit?

      Brother, you aren't kidding. I did not understand all the griping lately about video cards until last week when I looked at what a new one would cost. My R7850 from 2013 may actually have appreciated in value, and anything that would get me a meaningful performance increase over what was a $150 card 5 years ago costs $400+ today.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    42. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong again. Why do you continue to make shit up?

    43. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else will the CIA make budget?

    44. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's really mostly carbon...

    45. Re:God damn it by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And he gets a free +1 just for typing "capitalism" and "lefties foam at the mouth" while contributing absolutely nothing of value to the discussion?

      A shame I've already posted and can't fix this...

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    46. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice ideal, but reality knocked on the door and said fuck off. Unless you plan on providing hundreds of billions of additional subsidies to 3rd world countries then you haven't got a hope in hell of this happening and to be fair why should they stop, the western world modernised through cheap power generation of coal.

    47. Re:God damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be the very first one crying when the rest of the world slaps a CO2 tax on America.

      Even Trump knows this and now wants back into the TPP.

    48. Re:God damn it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It may release more CO2, but that isn't "polluting the hell" out of anything.

      Oh yeah I forgot CO2 was the harmless one. For the record we are talking about a small power station here, one that had horrible efficiency and even failed to meet it's own benchmarks for the environment. It was *the single biggest* emitter of CO2 per unit of energy produced in the country.

      So yes, it is polluting the hell out of everything.

    49. Re:God damn it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There have been scrubbers for that for almost a century.

      And where are they?

    50. Re:God damn it by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany they have been compulsory for all coal power plants since the early 1980s.

      I wish our car industry would be controlled just as strictly, instead of Merkel kissing the collective arses of VW, BMW and Daimler managers.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    51. Re:God damn it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany they have been compulsory for all coal power plants since the early 1980s.

      And the follow up question is: Where did that get you. Germany has the same pollution problem as Australia, only more of it (higher population) and concentrated in an even smaller landmass. Point is, coal plants are absolutely horrid even with all the bells and whistles attached. The best option may be everything + CCS but that has been an epic failure everywhere it was attempted, most recently being next door in the Netherlands with the government currently considering suing Uniper for the failed promise to deliver a clean coal power plant.

      I wish our car industry would be controlled just as strictly

      The car industry is starting to be controlled, just a tad slowly. Also they are being targeted on two fronts, production and the consumer as well. I was at TUV Nord only 2 weeks ago to get a umweltplakette for my windscreen (I don't actually live in Germany but I drive there enough that I was worried I may get a fine). Yeah it's a small effort to get some of the older nasties off the road but at least it's a start.

      Now the specific case you may be referring to is a more difficult one given who a major shareholder of VW actually is (Niedersachsen). And while it would be nice for the German government to effectively fine itself even more, you just know they won't further damage one of their largest industries. That said even they are starting to wake up. As bad as they are, at least VW have both all electric and hybrid offerings and more comming. The same can't be said for the barely minimum effort US car makers are bringing to the table.

      All in all you're still miles ahead of the USA and Australia, and at least your politicians are somewhat progressive (the finance minister in Australia recently took a piece of coal into parliament telling everyone they shouldn't be afraid of it, and we all know where Trump stands. )

    52. Re:God damn it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      And let's hope, even better filters on the new coal plants that Germany is building to replace its nukes.

    53. Re:God damn it by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      What plants are you talking about? Only one single new coal power plant is being built in Germany and it will probably be the final one. There is also a new block of an existing power plant being built as a replacement for three older blocks, but that's it.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    54. Re:God damn it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The plants that the enormous new strip mines at Garzweiler and Hambach are being exploited to supply. Hambach alone will cover 85 square kilometers. And now that Germany's last anthracite at Bottrop is exhausted, all of that new production is lignite - basically, damp firewood. A tiny fraction of that amount of coal in uranium would be supplying the same industrial baseload carbon-free. Instead, notwithstanding Germany's expensive investment in solar and wind, its carbon output is actually increasing.

      https://www.cleanenergywire.or...

    55. Re:God damn it by dryeo · · Score: 1

      So did authoritarian communism, doesn't mean that we want to push more of it even if it did lift the Russian surfs and Chinese peasants out of extreme poverty, increased their lifespan, helped cure terrible diseases and improved quality of life.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    56. Re:God damn it by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't know the difference between power plants and mines. And as for carbon output, the population of Germany grew suddenly by a very large amount. When the Arabs go back home the additional carbon output will go with them.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    57. Re:God damn it by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      nah those purges made lifespan take a big hit

    58. Re:God damn it by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea what life was like in Czarist Russia when most people were owned by the aristocrats and the secret police were everywhere and the cavalry would purge any dissidents? Or in Imperial China where starvation was very routine and the government was as corrupt as shit?
      All things considered, the people were better off, even with the purges that continued. If it wasn't for the authoritarian bastards who took advantage of the times, of course it would have gotten better and has in China though Russia is a pretty shitty place for the average person now.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    59. Re:God damn it by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      what nonsense about Russia, they abolished serfdom and were on their way to building something great. by early 20th century were the 4th biggest economic power. communism was a downgrade.

  5. Oh right, the power question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't Buttcoin supposed to run on mostly extra production from chinese dams? No? Well I'll be darnt, so much for that canard.

    1. Re: Oh right, the power question by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure you meant to say "I'll be dammed"...

    2. Re:Oh right, the power question by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Who told you that?

      There is no 'extra production' from any of the worlds dams. It's all pretty much sold off, within environmental constraints (you can't let rivers go dry or regularly put walls of water down them). Excepting perhaps Iceland, but they built the thing to make aluminium, so not even there.

      Whoever told you that bullshit had no respect for you. Terrible liar who thought you were stupid. Surplus power, in China?

      Either that, or you just made it up on the spot.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Oh right, the power question by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

      The left has a ban rationale for dams! (Fish, moving people, flooding archaeology, flooding spoor moss owl noots), wind (whackabird, noise, nimby), solar (nimby, birds bursting into flames, noots)

      Wait, what was the subject again?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Oh right, the power question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin fans told me that. I thought I implied it well enough.

    5. Re:Oh right, the power question by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Gee, is it just slightly possible that all forms of power have drawbacks but that doesn't mean we should throw up our hands and embrace the worst possible option that kills millions of innocent people every year to save a buck?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Oh right, the power question by danbert8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not a huge fan of coal and reactivating this plant for digital jerking off is about the stupidest thing humanity can do. But you can only get to "millions" of innocent people if you make some serious extrapolations and assumptions of lung afflictions and global warming causing mass deaths. Meanwhile on the other side of the equation is the "save a buck" which has a very measurable impact on saving lives in 3rd world countries. More people in the world die due to lack of access to electricity than due to any pollution side effects of electricity production.

      In fact, people in poor countries are so desperate for cheap fossil fuels that there are tragic mass deaths as people try to scavenge spilled gasoline from tanker trucks where they go in risking their lives for a cooking pot worth of fuel.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    7. Re:Oh right, the power question by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of 'bitcoin' fans. I've never heard that claim. I think you just made it up

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Maybe they should try solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This country has so much sunlight that melanoma is a major health concern.

    1. Re:Maybe they should try solar by novakyu · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they would, if they could find a closed solar power plant (in a country that has "so much sunlight" though?).

      It makes sense people interested in money (literally) will do what is most economical, with nary a thought about any other considerations.

    2. Re:Maybe they should try solar by kenh · · Score: 1

      Building solar is much more expensive than re-activating an existing coal-fired plant.

      Also, there is the "what do you do when the sun sets" question. Sure, you could buy batteries, but that only drives up costs.

      Remember, this is an off-grid power plant - it will power dedicated Crypto Currency "miners", the power will never go on the grid, will incur no distribution surcharge, and will not be taxed.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Maybe they should try solar by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      You could read the article and find out that what you are saying is complete bullshit. Of course it won't be off grid. Block-chain is just the excuse to turn it back on, block-chain won't be using all the power.

    4. Re:Maybe they should try solar by gravewax · · Score: 1

      They are looking for cheap electricity, they are not going to get that out of solar.

    5. Re:Maybe they should try solar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They are looking for cheap electricity, they are not going to get that out of solar."

      Not in Australia ;-)

  7. How to celebrate artificial scarcity like this? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    If we let people use electricty "on demand" people might not understand the artificial scarcity of our resources.

    The public school education system works very hard to educate people about how we shouldn't use anything and live in the woods.

    Better to stop this so we can pat ourselves on the back without interruption.

  8. Make it stop ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like the 90's when slapping .com onto anything made it teh super awesome.

    Then it became e-everything.

    Then when it was i-everything.

    Have we reached peak cryptocurrency yet? Because I don't give a fuck.

    1. Re:Make it stop ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      One year restart time...One year is an eternity in cryptocurrency time.

      At the end of all that, they're competing in a world power market, with an area that requires AC for datacenter cooling. So they'll effectively have to have power rates on the order of half the rates in a cold area, just to make up for heat pumping costs. Which doesn't even get into options like heating an office building with waste heat.

      They could easily end up with a pile of coal, a refurbed plant and no customers. Hopefully the plant is right on the mine and the mine was still running. I can't imagine they're sticking their necks out too far.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Thanks Satoshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re: Thanks Satoshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our current banking systems use 1000% more energy than Bitcoin. Try sending $1000000 overseas and you won't complain about the twenty cents worth of energy for a Bitcoin transaction. Pop

  10. Massive carbon tax would fix this by presidenteloco · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's too bad Australia seems to be run by fossils these days though, so that won't happen.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you mean these days? We were always proud of being in the big leagues of Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and the USofA when it comes to CO2 emssions per capita.

      Sure we've dropped the ball the last 4 years but we want to retake our place above the USA.

    2. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by lgw · · Score: 1

      You have far less slavery than Qatar though, so you've got that going for you. CO2 is the least of Qatar's sins.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aussies are slaves to fashion though...

    4. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's too bad Australia seems to be run by fossils these days though, so that won't happen.

      Well, given fossil fuels are burnt for a reason, sounds like the Aussies have got good supply to start with...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Aussie fashion = shorts, singlet, and thongs. And a hat if you're smart.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You have far less slavery than Qatar though, so you've got that going for you. CO2 is the least of Qatar's sins.

      You do realise that we are a country where our first police officer was the best behaved convict right?

    7. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You forgot sunscreen.

    8. Re:Massive carbon tax would fix this by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      is there any place not run by fossils ? its quite weird how all the green activists have been yanking on about the footprint, where i still havent actually seen a comparitive chart by independent research posting the print of crypto vs general motors versus cow shit on the planet , or add pig shit if its not enough, cos i think it's horse shit
      but i dont think re-opening coal plants is a good idea, EVER

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  11. Dirty money by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Huh, is this some sort of competition to find the dirtiest of money?

  12. He he he.... by no-body · · Score: 1

    All this stuff is speculation and it will crash again.
    Happy landing.

  13. MAGA by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Coal is Making Australia Great Again.

  14. We will end up like Venus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every last bitcoin must be confiscated and the proceeds used to repair the environmental damage caused by Satoshidiots.

    1. Re:We will end up like Venus by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      What 'proceeds'?

  15. Yikes by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    TFA is on a really bad website. Thank God for noscript. If you're one of the rare slashdotters who reads TFA, then get this add-on first.

    1. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TFA is on a really bad website. Thank God for noscript. If you're one of the rare slashdotters who reads TFA, then get this add-on first.

      So like, I have a hosts file and like most people I run an adblocker (ublock origin).

      The page loaded instantly and isn't showing me any ads.
      Last time I tried noscript not a single damn site I wanted to visit worked at all.

      Thanks anyway.

    2. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I tried noscript not a single damn site I wanted to visit worked at all.

      PEBKAC

  16. 12 months. . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    That seems like a long time in blockchain time. . . Isn't proof of space supposed to take over at some point, in which case the demand for computational and power resources in this space will be dramatically decreased?

    Then again, it is mid April, 2018 and I still cannot buy web storage hosted on file coin's network. . .

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:12 months. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No proof of space is not supposed to take over, I mean not if you actually understand how blockchains work. If you are an idiot investor who just throws money at things without caring then yeah sure, it's "about to take over" :eyeroll:

  17. A new parameter for the Drake Equation by sinij · · Score: 4, Funny

    A think we need to update Drake equation and add a parameter for crypto mining.

    1. Re:A new parameter for the Drake Equation by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      A think we need to update Drake equation and add a parameter for crypto mining.

      I didn't know he was into Math, but Drake might have to collect his Spotify royalties with a bitcoin wallet in the future:

      That means musicians like Drake, Justin Bieber, and Rihanna, who were Spotify’s most streamed artists last year, need to get comfortable with the idea that their royalties are going to be tracked on a blockchain—and maybe even paid out on one—before the fantasy of music on the blockchain takes shape.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  18. WTF?? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    I think the power company just wants to add "blockchain" to their name so the execs can cash out, but my quick back-of-napkin math makes me think it might actually work if they can fully sell it out. Assuming a 100MW plant, it would take US$25-40 million to get up and running, which would require $500/year/kW in rent for a 12-month payback, which equates to a US$0.05/kWh electricity savings to make it worthwhile.

    But it seems like a lot of risk for something 12 months out before generating cash flow that is already a bubble.

  19. Yeah but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think when the bubble bursts and the fad ends.

    All the people who are gonna get their asses handed to them and the schadenfreude - I relish that .

    They were warned. They all know of the Tuplip bulb craze and the dot-bomb craze. But the "it's different this time" mentality always gets some people.

  20. INFINTE FACEPALM by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This has got to be the most pants-on-head retarded nonsense I've heard yet. Is Australia vying for the title of 'most fucked up' with Florida or something?

    1. Re:INFINTE FACEPALM by labnet · · Score: 1

      Australia has been overtaken by green left lunatic ideology. We have been demolishing coal plants at a great rate which has given us power that costs 26c/kWh.
      I doubt this idea will ever get up.

      --
      46137
    2. Re:INFINTE FACEPALM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you right wingers so damned cheap? It's always about the bottom dollar with you, consequences be damned. Fuck you and fuck your red right lunatic ideaology. (see I can call you crazy too hurrr durrr)

    3. Re:INFINTE FACEPALM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck tomorrow, I just want what I want today! Who cares if there's a planet left to live on when I'm dead, LOL!

      Fucking Dominionists.

    4. Re:INFINTE FACEPALM by gravewax · · Score: 1

      probably because the consequences of expensive electricity are homelessness, people unable to afford to feed their children or elderly people unable to survive. Their has to be a happy medium and sadly it has gone a little too far to the lunatic left here in Aus at the moment.

    5. Re:INFINTE FACEPALM by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      We have been demolishing coal plants at a great rate which has given us power that costs 26c/kWh.

      Oh honey, our price skyrocketed long before we started demolishing coal plants. Deregulation along with an expectation that the power doesn't go out even in huge storms did that for us. Learn a bit of history.

  21. alt-capitalist masturbation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like rolling coal orders of magnitude larger and more "in your face" asshole.

  22. Utter stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know how civilization will end, when all the world resources are funneled into generating digital bits of vanity.

    1. Re:Utter stupidity by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Yeah, like gaming is 10 times better...

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  23. Well, they said "you can't eat money" by enjar · · Score: 1

    I guess we get to breathe it now. Awesome. What's the ETA on that giant meteor that is just supposed to just put us all out of our misery?

  24. What about the other 95%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headline suggests the power plant is being opened explicitly to fuel blockchain mining, but the article indicates only 5% of the power is expected to be used in blockchain applications. That would seem to leave 95% unaccounted for.

    1. Re:What about the other 95%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The headline suggests the power plant is being opened explicitly to fuel blockchain mining, but the article indicates only 5% of the power is expected to be used in blockchain applications. That would seem to leave 95% unaccounted for.

      That'll be used for mining the coal.

  25. Own power plant by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    I used to joke that some video cards require you to bring your own power plant, but this is ridiculous.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    1. Re:Own power plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's called progress. In two decades a cryptominer will have their own nuclear fusion plant.

      Most people are just shortsighted here. I do think we should close the coal plant, however, but if the rest of the population is this stupid, I cannot help it either.

  26. save us Elon! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    HAW HAW!
    You stupid fuckers' planet is headed for a special mention Darwin award!


    oh wait...

    crap.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  27. Today's Cabage Patch Dolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Beanie Babies
    * Cabage Patch Dolls
    * Blockchain Mining

  28. Earlier... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    1880's to 1920's. You know the story: sweat shops, robber barons, child labor, Pinkerton, etc. The 1950's and 60's brought us great wealth, but we were also the only untouched first-world country after the war. Thus, we were able to afford some concern about pollution, conservation, welfare, civil rights and the like. Taxes were high and business was good... until the Oil Crisis in the 70's. We've been in trouble ever since.

    1. Re:Earlier... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Eh, my timeline's wrong. the 1970's was the environmentalist decade. So, yeah, ignore that post.

    2. Re:Earlier... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Lots of people have been interested in environmentalist issues all around the world before the 1970's.
      Most of that good standard of living was used to contrast the West from Communism.
      Everything was done to make the free West look amazing from the ~ 1945-1980's

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Earlier... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      but we were also the only untouched first-world country after the war.

      That's true, Australia, Canada and New Zealand all got bombed back to the stone age during WWII.
      The modern environment movement probably started with Silent Spring questioning the honesty of the chemical companies, which was published in '62.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:Earlier... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for mentioning countries that didn't have the industrial base to meet world demand. I wasn't specific enough in my own post.

      I tend to think that with great prosperity, came great ease. We could finally afford to think about the environment and take care of some things. Then, just as we started to act, economical and trade issues developed and decades later we're straddled with this narrative that we can't be good stewards of the Earth or... regulate anything really... without completely wrecking the economy.

      The great ease bought by easy money left us, and we're again desperately clawing for any avenue to avoid bankruptcy. Regulation, of anything, has reduced itself to being a tool to mete out favors, pick winners and losers, with both sides doing it. Now, everyone lacks in credibility when they stand before us declaring they have the solution for what ails the country.

      Immigration, abortions, gay adoptions, and gun ownership might get easier or harder with passing administrations, and pot may one day be legal, but where things really matter - the collapsing ecosystem and your dwindling paycheck... it's always just more of the same.

    5. Re:Earlier... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The bullshit that making money is more important then the environment or health of the people goes back quite a ways.
      We had a big strike here in Canada back in the '50's at the asbestos mill. The workers went on strike, not for money, but rather their demands were 2 sets of lockers, one for their work clothes and one for their street clothes, along with showers and a car wash. They knew the asbestos was going to kill them, but didn't want their families to die. The strike went on for years as the company was too cheap to meet those reasonable demands. That was the attitude for the longest time until the people felt empowered enough to demand regulations, and as you say, it is still happening.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  29. The silver lining available here by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    There is a possible silver lining here. If we can 1) consolidate bit coin mining, 2) have them use power plant scale amounts of power, then we have a new resource which is concentrated waste heat. Bit coin gives off waste heat but when distributed no center may be large enough to make practical recovery valuable. But if a whole power plant is devoted to this then a new scale may be emerging.
    They need to think about how to co-locate thermal power intensive industries. Some things like smelting iron probably require even more thermal concentration than possible. But things like baking bread or raising shrimp or some chemical industry activities might need lots of low level heat. Perhaps, in a nice ironic cycle, one could power CO2 sequestration using the waste heat.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:The silver lining available here by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      1) That's a bad thing. The NICE part of bitcoin is that it's distributed. It's a feature!

      2) It's WASTE heat dude.

      But sure, they've been trying to harvest waste heat from power plants. I've heard some interesting ideas about using the heat gradient as a sterling engine and turning it into vibrations then converting that back into power.

      They need to think about how to co-locate thermal power intensive industries.

      They're going to co-locate where the damn coal is cheap. Where the land is cheap. Where the employees are cheap. Or do you think having a cheap bread baking oven is going to offset the cost of running a RAIL ROAD LINE from the coal mine to the coal plant? It's great that you're thinking about efficiencies. But this is a general issue with power plants that has been around a long time and there's a whole field of education dedicated to this stuff. It's like commenting that maybe NASA should think about how much air resistance rockets have to deal with.

    2. Re:The silver lining available here by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Employees?

      Mining is power intensive. It is capital intensive. It is not labor intensive. The only employees you need are one technician to maintain the equipment, one accountant-trader to turn the coins into conventional money to pay the bills with, and enough security guards to stop anyone absconding with your very expensive hardware.

    3. Re:The silver lining available here by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The only silver lining is that the coal won't be shipped through/by the Great Barrier Reef to be burned in India or China.

    4. Re:The silver lining available here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "2) It's WASTE heat dude."

      That's what Thermodynamics teaches, so don't even try to use it, right? If you try to use waste heat for something, you'll violate the second law and no one will talk to you.

      "Or do you think having a cheap bread baking oven is going to offset the cost of running a RAIL ROAD LINE from the coal mine to the coal plant?"

      If you look at a utility's financial report, you will notice they make more than enough money from buying and selling financial assets to pay for electricity production, maintenance, and a handsome profit. Fees are just icing on the cake. They have decoupled fees from supplying electricity. They charge fees just because they can, not because they need fees to supply electricity.

      Power plants produce far more electricity than demand asks for. Electricity should be free.

  30. argle bargle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blockchain DEEZ NUTZ!

  31. All cryptocurrencies are scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are (any) fiat-currency and (any) cryptocurrency really equivalent, as cryptocurrency fans claim?
    For example, US Dollar and Bitcoin are really equals?
    Value/validity/authorization of US dollar is provided/guaranteed by US Government (and in-turn whole US Public)!
    Also, not to mention, US Dollars in any US Bank is insured by US Government!
    What authorization/guarantee/insurance is behind Bitcoin? Nothing!
    Sorry but that is the end of discussion then!

    Why do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is really hiding his identity, if Bitcoin is really such a great innovation?
    He is just someone does not like media/fan attention?
    Or, could it be really because Bitcoin (and all cryptocurrencies followed it) are actually Ponzi Schemes?
    (So he knew very well that law enforcement would come after him sooner or later?!)

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really money; isn't people issuing their own money, illegal already, in all countries?
    If so then, why they are still not banned in all countries?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

    1. Re:All cryptocurrencies are scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh. Spoken like someone who invested everything in Bitcoin when it was over $19k.

    2. Re:All cryptocurrencies are scams! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      STFU Ivan.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  32. "Leftist", a Rush Limbaugh shibboleth by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Leftists are boogeymen created by conservative talk show hosts.

    I'd actually say that Bitcoin is a product of libertarians. The sort that don't think our monetary system should be left to the government. And yeah, "how do deal with pollution" gets you a variety of answers from that crowd.

    1. Re:"Leftist", a Rush Limbaugh shibboleth by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd actually say that Bitcoin is a product of libertarians. The sort that don't think our monetary system should be left to the government. And yeah, "how do deal with pollution" gets you a variety of answers from that crowd.

      That's certainly where it started, but there just aren't that many of those guys. Bitcoin grew when it became the currency of choice for darknet, but that too is limited in size. Today the main use of Bitcoin is to sneak money out of China, and that's a vast market indeed. Of course, the people mining it don't care about any of that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  33. Hilarious by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    "We techies are so very environmentally responsib ... ooh, shiny bitcoin!"

  34. it'll grow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this could catch on.

    use a coal fired plant to mine enough bitcoin to finance building a SECOND coal fired plant. ... then with two power plants, it would only take 50pct of the time to mine enough bitcoin to finance a THIRD power plant as it took to build the second ... and then just a third as much time to finance the FOURTH ... ... pretty soon, we could cover all of australia in power plants

    its like the Andromeda Strain "it'll grow and mutate, we'll never get rid of it"

  35. Does Not Compute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Something fishy is going on here. Australia has some of the highest insolation levels of any developed country. It would be cheaper to build a new solar plant in the sunniest part of the country and run it for 10 years than it would be to restart an existing coal plant. Hunter Valley is a nice place to live, but bitcoin miners DGAF about that, they probably don't even live in the country.

    I guess the only benefit to coal is it can run 24x7, but I have to think the biggest cost of bitcoin mining is the energy, not the equipment, so just buy 2x the amount of miners...

    I smell some sort of government subsidy.

    1. Re:Does Not Compute by KeensMustard · · Score: 2
      Well yes.

      A closer read of the article reveals that the idea (and it is still an idea) was conceived by an entrepreneur who, you guessed it, has a financial sake in getting that particular coal plant restarted.

      Coal power in Australia is not competitive, for the reasons you state: a trade deal with China makes panels cheap, and unused land is cheap and there is sunlight going free. Even this plan is part of broader plan to transition to solar on site at the coal plant.

      In Australia we are treated to the curious sight of having right wing 'economic dry' conservatives attempting to socialize the production of power to build coal plants because private industry - to whom they sold the plants, won't build more and keep shuttering old ones.

  36. Deadend industry changes to deadend industry by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Film at 11

    Won't help them

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. Imagine The Investment Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Coal is yesterday's game, right?"
    - Yeah

    "And Bitcoin is a Wild West of unsupported valuations, questionable players, and bizarre justifications."'
    - Yeah?

    "What if we combine the two. We take 2 bad ideas, and make them one. The bad parts of one will cancel the bad parts of the other, and we make out like bandits!!! It's genius!"
    - What if the bad parts don't cancel? What if they actually reinforce each other?

    "It doesn't matter! We get out early and let the suckers go down with the ship! It's a can't lose proposition!"
    - Tell me more...

  38. Satanist Bringing Jeebus Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like President Pence wants!

  39. Will they... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

    Will they have the necessary CO2 scrubbers and sequestering technology to make it pass the Australian pollution regulations? Or is it that this Anti-Science intelligence deficit disease (ASIDD) is just as contagious over there as it is here in the US?

  40. Spoof by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Is this article from The Onion? Coal-powered Bitcoin may just be the pinnacle of the human capacity for assholery.

  41. Make up your mind already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is now leftist libertarian? Back in 2016 it still was not merely right, but "extreme right": The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism

    (No, I haven't RTFB either. With a title like that? Pfft.)

    1. Re:Make up your mind already by magarity · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is now leftist libertarian? Back in 2016 it still was not merely right, but "extreme right"

      There's no such thing as "leftist libertarian". That's like "capitalist Trotskyite".

    2. Re:Make up your mind already by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Steve Bannon claims to be a capitalist Leninist, after all...

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Make up your mind already by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Marx encouraged capitalist adventures that financed and grew communism.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    4. Re: Make up your mind already by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Since when are libertarians left? Absolute libertarians ultimately believe in the right of the strong. They are also utilitaristic and therefore even worse than fascists.

    5. Re: Make up your mind already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marx was a late 19th century political economist. A precursor of the 'web warrior' commentariots who fume and fury today in online forums.

    6. Re:Make up your mind already by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Libertarian-ism was a leftist philosophy before the right wingers hopped on the bandwagon. Leftism is about empowering the people, getting rid of government, or at least making it as local as possible whereas rightism is about empowering the aristocracy, or now a days the rich.
      From https://www.urbandictionary.co...

      Not an oxymoron. In fact, the term "libertarian" was first used by a French anarcho-communist back in 1857 to describe himself (an anarchist). The modern term libertarianism (economic freedoms) was originally called liberalism. The term "libertarian" describes liberty (thus, the term is also used to describe metaphysical liberty within philosophy and metaphysics), and the term socialism describes a society in which wealth is fairly distributed. Thus, it is neither a literal nor a practical contradiction.

      A libertarian socialist would argue that a society based on such huge disparities of wealth is unfree. If you wish to enter into employment, you choose first and take orders later (as with liberal democracy). Libertarian socialists believe in voluntary association and economic democracy. This will allow the individual to reach his/her full potential.

      The most famous example of successful libertarian socialism is the anarcho-syndicalist experiment in Spain during to Spanish Civil War, which was eventually destroyed by Communists and Fascists (see Orwell' "Homage to Catalonia" for excellent first hand reportage of this). At its peak, the anarchist union (CNT) had one million members.

      Although sharing much of (if not all of) the Marxist analysis of capitalism, lib socialists vehemently oppose state socialism, especially the authoritarian socialism of Lenin, Trotsky, Mao and, more recently, the socialism of Hugo Chavez. The modern dispute between the two schools of socialism began in the First International, in which Karl Marx and Mikhail Bakunin bitterly argued over the road socialists should take. This dispute has continued ever since, with many Marxist regimes imprisoning, murdering (Russia), and exiling (Cuba) anarchists.
      Modern advocates of libertarian socialism include linguist Noam Chomsky, historian and playwright Howard Zinn, and the Industrial Workers of the World ("One Big Union"), and the International Workers Association (of which the Spanish CNT is its largest affiliate).

      Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Basically libertarian-ism that empowers the people rather then libertarian-ism that empowers the rich.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re: Make up your mind already by dryeo · · Score: 1

      See https://slashdot.org/comments.... funny enough American Libertarians are actually old time Liberals with their belief in economic freedom, unluckily there has been so much propaganda over the 20th century that terms have changed with the current belief that Stalinism equals socialism and somehow the modern capitalist is not authoritarian.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  42. bye bye by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Race to the bottom.

  43. Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry guys, this is most likely Clean Coal!

  44. Windtroll back again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the cleaner more efficient ones replacing older dirty ones?
    Windtroll back again

  45. rich gunna pollute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could just ask the US why per capita it's just about the dirtiest country there is, and ask them to shoulder some of the burden and caut their use in half down to Chinese levels or cut 80% and drop to Indian levels.
    But no, blaming Chinese coal is much better for your bosses and your feelings of smugness.

  46. coalition by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    oh fuck me - the IdiOT Group, offshoot of the young liberals
    the neoliberal hard right goons have found another excuse to keep coal going
    sounds like a brain fart
    want to make money while your sitting around being an entitled, fucking yuppy, we've got fake money
    need something, but you're too fucking stupid to do it yourself, we've got slaves for hire
    fucking selfies, make me a drone in clear plastic, then I'll be excited

    --
    Go well
  47. Re:No Kiwi Coal with APKoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod this up so we can all get some laughs watching APK chase his own tail like a feral hedgehog.

  48. LOL Do you not know the first thing about coal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you be so anti-coal and yet not know the first things about it?

    Is it the same as how you are so anti-China and don't know the first thing about that either?

  49. Europe using more coal too ... by drnb · · Score: 1

    So not onlly are we going to waste tons of electricity, we're going to pollute now too.

    Don't get too smug, US coal exports to Europe have *doubled* to make up for the power shortfall from the decommissioning of some nuclear plants to appease environmentalists.

    1. Re: Europe using more coal too ... by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any source for that claim? CO2 output has decreased in the EU. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/s...

    2. Re: Europe using more coal too ... by drnb · · Score: 1

      Do you have any source for that claim? CO2 output has decreased in the EU.

      Apologies, I was working from memory and the doubling was for specific EU countries not overall. Yet overall there was still a huge increase. Ex:
      "Overall exports to European nations totaled 16 million tons in the first five months of this year, up from 10.5 million in the same period last year [52% increase] ... They included a surge to several European countries during the 2017 period, including a 175 percent increase in shipments to the United Kingdom, and a doubling to France - which had suffered a series of nuclear power plant outages that required it and regional neighbors to rely more heavily on coal." https://www.reuters.com/articl...

    3. Re: Europe using more coal too ... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      So not due to decommissioning nuclear power plants but rather that they're not reliable enough.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re: Europe using more coal too ... by drnb · · Score: 1

      So not due to decommissioning nuclear power plants but rather that they're not reliable enough.

      The decommissioning put them into the position where they no longer had surplus capacity. When a failure occurred they had to resort to coal. Had there not been these decommissionings they simply would have had a smaller surplus and no need to increase coal usage. So the root cause is still the decommissioning.

  50. Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "happy medium" is "close down coal plants as fast as we possibly can" because "close down coal plants as fast as the science says we should" is bloody impossible with the pea brained Coalition in power.

    This left vs right thing you think you see is "people who understand science and the effect of CO2 on our future civilisation" vs "people who think science is a conspiracy and we can pollute forever".

    The carbon tax that Abbott killed was the best legislation we had in this area. That numbnut is the most dangerous person the parliament has ever seen. He's still wrecking our environmental laws. If Turnbull didn't have Abbott biting his arse all day we'd have a carbon tax again.

    BTW, the carbon tax legislation compensated low income earners. It made nobody at all homeless. The only people who think poor people should be homeless are the right wingers who think poor people deserve being poor.

  51. Zero sum versus zero emission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Smith must have the air that he breathes poisoned so that Jones can get rich.

    The creatures outside looked from the USA to Australia, and from Australia to the USA, and from the USA to Australia again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

  52. No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a classic "pump and dump" scheme. David Gerard has the background detail, and an analysis that is far better than what I can give.

    Short version: hype and noise, sound and fury, all in the name of people trying to pump up a penny stock so they can cash out.

  53. Power alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well lets see, Tesla put in a mega battery block that seems to have met demand for a month. Well, as usual, Musk comes up short.

  54. Behind the Chinese curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are soft coal mines in China that do this already, as the marginal price of soft coal is so low that there is no profit from trying to delivery it from the mine. They could push the power to the grid, but chinese regulators actually have been getting on the case of coal power plant operators to install exhaust scrubbers (note install, it seems many do not actually activate the scrubbers due to plant parasitic power cost). These ghetto mine operated coal powerplants thus don't feed the local grid and thus are somewhat invisible from the regulators, thus no exhaust scrubber install, just a skeezy boiler and some cases a piston driving a generator rather than a steam turbine. Pairing this up with bitcoin production, which puts profits technically out of the reach of internal currency controls, is a game winner, and many chinese saw this quite some time ago as a kind of electrical power arbitrage, and executed.

  55. Hahahaha I get the LAST LAUGH @ u... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha I get the LAST LAUGH @ u - You got downmodded despite your request & have to EAT IT I laugh @ U over it too, lmao!

    APK

    P.S.=> You WASTE OF LIFE do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" NO TALENT & no life UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous clowns are losers & you KNOW it - it's all you can manage to do (just as you have here, proving it)... apk