Slashdot Mirror


End of the Landline: BT Aims To Move All UK Customers To VoIP by 2025 (siliconrepublic.com)

BT aims to move its UK customers to IP telephony by 2025. From a report: BT is shutting its traditional telephone network in the UK, according to an email seen by The Register. The public switched telephone network (PSTN) closure is part of the company's plans to move in a fibre network direction in terms of its infrastructure. All phone calls will eventually be made over broadband using VoIP systems, which means the company's existing wholesale line rental products, which are reliant on the PSTN, will need to be removed. BT Openreach runs the network used by all but one of the telecoms providers in the UK.

101 comments

  1. Sucks if you have no power by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Landlines work in a lot of cases where the power's down, at least in the States. Not sure about UK.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Sucks if you have no power by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Landlines work in a lot of cases where the power's down, at least in the States. Not sure about UK.

      And the voltage on a land line can be useful for recharging USB devices in no power situations....

      http://www.instructables.com/i...

    2. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      In our case, we opted to have fiber rather than a copper landline (Verizon Fios) - so aside from a small backup battery there is no phone service during a power outage. Over the last 10 years, I've found our cell phone service to be 100% reliable during power outages - including extended outages due to disasters like Sandy and Irene. Cell phones are easy to charge via power packs, generators, or car chargers. Our alarm system uses a cell phone backup, and it has worked in every power outage (I know because my alarm company calls when the power goes out).

      So I think this particular advantage is overblown.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Sucks if you have no power by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Landlines work in a lot of cases where the power's down, at least in the States. Not sure about UK.

      That's why VOIP and Radio Local Loop hardware for standard telephone service in the UK includes a battery.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re: Sucks if you have no power by houghi · · Score: 1

      If your power goes down that often that this becomes an issue, perhaps the powerdown is the issue, not the move to VoiP.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Sucks if you have no power by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      "Old" landlines do work when the power's out.

      My neighbour with respiratory problems and daily care visits got a battery backup installed along with the other box when they switched him to fibre. I didn't, but I think it's an optional extra for anyone who wants one.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually phoned up my power company the other day when we had an outage (goose flew into power lines knocked out power for several kilometers) I mean yes I have a mobile phone but the convenience of having communication with a separate power supply is nice.

      There are also a lot of calling features that I don't think people are really aware of (like being able to group call, call forwarding you can enable/disable remotely, etc) that are just impractical on mobile (data vs voice charges) or sound like crap (VOIP.)

      The landline system is pretty amazing if you really tap into what it can do...

    7. Re:Sucks if you have no power by PPH · · Score: 1

      The Verizon provided FiOS battery backup only supports the phone function. They drop broadband (and TV?) when the power goes out at your home interface. So I ended up plugging the FiOS interface into my router/PC UPS anyway.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Sucks if you have no power by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is assuming you still have a direct wired phone.
      Most people who still have a LAN Line, often will just have a cordless phone. Which doesn't work with the power out anyways.

      I remember watching a friends child play with Doll house parts. There was a toy telephone (from the 1990's) her parents coudln't convince her that it was actually a telephone and not an iron.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Sucks if you have no power by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thing is, a lot of people don't even want a landline any more. I don't, I just want broadband and mobile.

      How about instead of mucking about with VOIP on landlines, BT offer gigabit fibre to everyone and stop making me pay for a phone service I don't want?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Sucks if you have no power by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Landlines work in a lot of cases where the power's down, at least in the States. Not sure about UK.

      My VOIP setup works w/o power just fine. Of course I have a couple of UPS's that keep the network equipment running to make this happen. The wireless phone system won't work though so I keep a wired handset plugged in just in case.

      Land Lines work just the same in the UK as in the US and won't depend on the power being on in your house to work. The power to run the phone comes from the central office, assuming you have a wired handset...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Megane · · Score: 1

      Back in 2001 or so, the copper in the alley behind my house went to crap. I actually lost analog phone before the DSL gave up, though I learned then and since that TCP/IP isn't very happy with more than 25% or so packet loss.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    12. Re: Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a battery backup too - they said it's standard now.

    13. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maintain a battery in every home and business, and swap it every 2-3 years while also probably requiring handsets to also have their own power source...

      vs

      maintain one uninterruptible power supply with generator backup for an entire municipality and provide support for self powered wired handsets in the process..

      hmmmm.

      i get that POTS is limited (as far as data services go), but sometimes old tech is better tech. it's certainly a 1000x better for voice (and fax, which is still essential for several industries/businesses/professions) than voip, or fiber, or wireless... those services compress voice so much it's barely even usable (and sometimes isn't).

      just when computers are getting efficient enough to be actually usable while still being powered by a low-powered POTS line, you want to yank that free juice away? wankers.

    14. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Same thing in the US. It just doesn't last very long if your outage is prolonged... maybe 8 hours on standby.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Sucks if you have no power by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      My cell phone works when the power is out. The towers have back up power.

      Nothing works after there has been an earthquake (I'm in California) because the land lines and cell phones are both swamped with calls. So I'm not convinced there is a perfect solution for reliable emergency service.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    16. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY reason the land lines continue to work is because somewhere nearby (within a few miles) is a building with backup power. Often battery plus a gas fired generator but could be diesel or other.

      VoIP systems could do the same thing although it is more complicated since you need backup power on-site (Verizon FiOS does this but the run time is quite limited).

    17. Re: Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... have you considered perhaps that this would include that?

    18. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lasts over a week if you unplug it and only plug it back in when you need to make an emergency call.

    19. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if you need to receive calls?

    20. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you use the phone line to charge something, especially during power outages, you're an asshole. That power is limited and needed to keep the PSTN working. The more current you draw, the quicker it runs out.

    21. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, that's less than ideal. It's not a practical problem anyway, since everyone has a cell phone - in an emergency I don't need to run down to the basement, plug in the fiber router, and then run back up to a hardwired phone - I just take the phone out of my pocket and dial 911.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Albert71292 · · Score: 1

      Around three years ago, we had a power outage here (northeast Louisiana area) that lasted two and a half days. The old fashioned "POTS" line was down the entire time also, no dial tone (I have a wired handset phone on my home office desk). That's when I decided to start saving around $30/month by switching to a Voip service. I figured, "Hey, if the expensive landline fails during an outage also, what's the difference?"

      --
      "A Bird In The Hand Will Poop On Your Wrist"-Benny Hill,1982
    23. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because the phone company has battery backups and generators on their end. Nothing stopping you from doing the exact same thing with your VOIP line if that's really a concern of yours.

    24. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you prepared to pay the real cost of installing all that fibre though or do you want gigabit fibre for xdsl prices?

    25. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it's certainly a 1000x better for voice (and fax, which is still essential for several industries/businesses/professions) than voip, or fiber, or wireless..

      We actually have regular PTSN fax machine plugged into the Cable telephone connection at work (Charter/Spectrum if that matters. 4 Lines, 3 for voice and 1 for fax/credit card terminals), and it has worked without any problems for several years. (We have person who sends us 3-6 faxes a week that vary from 12-25 pages, have a few other people that we end up having to resend those faxes too as well). (Fax is still set for ECM and it works fine. Just switched machines and the new one doesn't tell me if the other end supported ECM, but previous one would)

      But I don't know if the VoIP box supports T.38 or if it just goes full g711 when it senses a fax. And it is running over their network, not the general internet.

      So what I'm I saying? If the provider works at it they can make a system that can handle faxes.

      It is people trying to use high compression on the lines the faxes are plugged into, or not having a stable/consistent connection.

    26. Re:Sucks if you have no power by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      So why have a land line at all?!

    27. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Excellent question! In my case it serves as a redundant line for the alarm, but we really only have it because it comes "free" with our internet bundle.

      We also call internationally fairly frequently, but for that I have a VOIP phone hooked up to the house wiring through an Obi device. This also lets us call the house with our cell phones and then forwards our international calls (though I use an Android SIP app if I have a decent internet connection). For my wife it's easier to just call the house, and besides that it lets me route the call to the cheapest SIP provider for that country.

      Finally, we have an actual address tied to 911 - so that can speed the response in an emergency.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not paying for the phone service, you're paying for the physical line that's used to carry your broadband.

    29. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who still use fax machines also, they will work over voip.... sometimes, but the manufacturers won't support it.

    30. Re:Sucks if you have no power by mikael · · Score: 1

      Because the UK has a "window tax" on fibre optic cabling:

      https://www.uctoday.com/featur...
      https://www.theregister.co.uk/...
      The Tax Valuations Office considers fibre-optic cabling a value-added asset to a company. The more kilometers and strands of fibre-optic cabling to your premises, the more thousands of pounds of tax your company has to pay each year (starting at £2000 for the first km). For BT and Virgin Media, that runs to billions of pounds of tax each year. Thus the pressure to gets as much capacity out of a single strand of fibre-optic as possible, and the government loves the revenue. They don't want competition that would simply bring prices down.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    31. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      Power outages are still a thing in the States. Not sure about the UK.

    32. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I finally killed my fax service, but for probably 10 years or so I was using an email-based fax service that was just a few bucks a month. Cheaper than maintaining a dedicated line even if you ignore the cost of the fax machine and supplies.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    33. Re:Sucks if you have no power by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's really interesting.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Very rare, usually they only last a couple of minutes and there's less that one outage per year that I've noticed.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    35. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    36. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do this because you just didn't pay the electric power bills, or you're squatting the house, or the power outage is limited to the house this seems a nice thing to do.

    37. Re:Sucks if you have no power by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I keep a wired phone around for just that reason. It also has a light under the buttons which is handy to tell if the line is live. Had mice chew the line under the house before and assumed the no dial tone was due to wire thieves as usual.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    38. Re:Sucks if you have no power by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I've had lots of 3 day outages (far enough out that we're last on the list to fix) and only once did the POTS go down. The phone lines are a lot more stretchy then the power lines. After a storm. I've gone into town and seen the tree on the lines that broke the power lines, the phone line would just be stretched to the ground.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    39. Re: Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably sufficient for 99+% of power outages.

    40. Re:Sucks if you have no power by jmccue · · Score: 1

      crap, meant to mod informative. It is AC anyway. So I will chime in, I know many people in my area, that regularly loose power and when that happens it is for a minimum of 3 days. All of them have VOIP and after 8 hours no phone and cell is very iffy. I have a land line and only lost it once many many years ago, rest of the time I can call without issue. As the parent said, what can be done over copper is quite amazing, I even read there is a way to use copper to get very high-speed internet, but we are stuck paying comcast et/el to build nonexistent/invisible infrastructure. Funny Ma Bell and no issues with the last mile.

    41. Re: Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure Verizon did the math. Doesn't really console you when a big storm knocks your power out for a week.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re:Sucks if you have no power by necronom426 · · Score: 1

      I suppose it depends were you live. Small villages in the middle of nowhere may still get them, but I can't remember in which decade we last had a power cut.

    43. Re:Sucks if you have no power by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      that is interesting. Is not the phone a VOIP? Because if so, it simply means that they are choosing to block the broadband.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    44. Re:Sucks if you have no power by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      But the thing, is that they are "Retro" telephone.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    45. Re:Sucks if you have no power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ... depends on the emergency situation ... do you know what happens in a bomb attack, earthquake, etc type of emergency? ... cellular lines crash within minutes as everyone is trying to make a call ...

    46. Re:Sucks if you have no power by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then getting through probably won't do you any good :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    47. Re:Sucks if you have no power by PPH · · Score: 1

      Is not the phone a VOIP?

      For my FiOS, if I were to buy their phone service, they would use a VOIP converter built into their network interface device (the box on your wall). When the power goes out, their battery continues to power their VOIP line and the copper loop into your residence, but not the broadband Ethernet and CATV interfaces.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  2. good bye by mapkinase · · Score: 2

    high quality audio conversations

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, it seems like switching to a technology that's capable of greater than an 8kHz sampling rate should result in BETTER quality. The VoIP system at my office certainly sounds better than a landline or cell phone, but then I suppose our network admins don't have the same set of concerns as a telecom operator.

    2. Re:good bye by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      High quality audio conversations over the traditional POTS? Are you serious?

    3. Re:good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High quality, no. High reliability? Yes. VOIP over the public internet sounds great - when it's working fine. But there's a lot more dropouts & disconnections.than you get with the PSTN. Of course, that shouldn't be the case if the phone company uses a private VOIP network with suitable QoS measures.

    4. Re:good bye by bigfinger76 · · Score: 2

      We still have a landline, and the quality is invariably better than my cellphone or the VOIP at work. Plant quality varies.

    5. Re:good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of the 21CN network is already digital with a mix of VOIP and other related technologies. Lots of SBC converting to legacy.

    6. Re:good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VoIP done right is indistinguishable from excellent digital PSTN (ISDN) and often even better than that, because much better codecs than G.711 can be used.

      VoIP done cheaply, i.e. using low bandwidth codecs over congested or faulty networks with packet loss, is crap.

    7. Re:good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VoIP done right is indistinguishable from excellent digital PSTN (ISDN) and often even better than that, because much better codecs than G.711 can be used.

      VoIP done cheaply, i.e. using low bandwidth codecs over congested or faulty networks with packet loss, is crap.

      I know which one the US would use. Which one do you think the UK will use?

    8. Re:good bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Voice over Internet Protocol". Choose what you want. There is no shortage of VoIP providers.

    9. Re:good bye by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      high quality audio conversations

      300Hz to 3300kHz.... "high quality" ... I can only assume the rap music has wreaked your ears or your brain for you to come up with that post.

    10. Re:good bye by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >VoIP done right

      >VoIP done cheaply

      You seem to be posing two options.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  3. This is completely normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not replacing the last mile (from the home to the exchange). They're replacing the backhaul, from Ericsson AXEs to Cisco MPLS devices and a variety of other IP based networking. VoIP is then provided seamlessly between exchanges, no new phones or wires required.

    They've been doing it since 2005 - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_21CN

    1. Re:This is completely normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. German Telekom is going for the same kind of switchover by the end of this year. It's going to take a little longer, but in many area codes, you can't get a true POTS line anymore. It's all VoIP.

      Another thing that is noteworthy is that the UK seems to have no problem advertising VDSL technology as "fibre broadband". Actual FTTH/B deployment is deplorable: With roughly 30 million households in the UK in total, the number of "homes passed" is only about a million, even fewer connected and then again even fewer subscribed.

  4. Get off my Internet! by GrBear · · Score: 1

    So.. if you can't afford broadband, or don't want it for whatever reason, you're going to be without a phone line?

    Back in the day, a landline was $8 a month and would give you data via dialup. Good luck finding a broadband replacement for double or triple that.

    1. Re:Get off my Internet! by darkain · · Score: 1

      You're funny. Today, at least in the Seattle area, a POTS line is ~$60/mo after taxes/fees. Broadband internet is much cheaper than a POTS line now.

    2. Re:Get off my Internet! by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      You forgot the 20 some dollars in taxes/fees/line charges.

    3. Re:Get off my Internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just want voice, then cellular solutions are cheaper these days (at least here in the UK). I'm surprised there don't seem to be many (any?) companies who'll provide the equivalent service to a landline over a cellular network for those people who prefer the traditional phone in the house (such as the elderly), but at a lower price to a physical landline.

    4. Re:Get off my Internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What day was this back in? 25 years ago, the cheapest bare-bones local-only phone service I could find was still at least $20/month. Add in a long distance provider, touch tone fee, Spanish-American War tax, etc. and $30-40/month was common. Which is why people started ditching their landlines for cell phones in the late '90s.

    5. Re:Get off my Internet! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you can't afford broadband, you can't afford a BT phone. We have their FTTP service, but are required by them to pay for a landline service that we don't even have a phone plugged into. Their line rental costs more than both of us pay for the mobile phones that we actually do use. If you actually make calls on the BT phone, it becomes even more expensive.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. what about elevator / lift phones? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about elevator / lift phones?

    1. Re:what about elevator / lift phones? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Do you think they're going to force the entire on-premises wiring to be all fiber right up to the phone? Are you actually retarded or just pretending? They only care about what goes up to the point of presence, where it ends in a VoIP box with a local power supply (with a battery if you're lucky) and a standard analog phone jack.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:what about elevator / lift phones? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      well some fire codes may say that the elevator / lift must have it's own hardwired phone line.

    3. Re:what about elevator / lift phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can install a VOIP adapter in the elevator equipment bay that converts the digital to the POTS cable running into the elevator itself.

    4. Re: what about elevator / lift phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, youâ(TM)re only pretending.

    5. Re:what about elevator / lift phones? by gigne · · Score: 1

      this doesn't affect last leg, it's the core network. The inter-exchange network. Have three PSTN cables to the lift if you want, that hasn't changed.
      I appreciate you thinking up a scenario I hadn't considered (considering the hard time you seem to be getting). At work we are going voip, and having a massive PSTN tear out. I'd better check some regs on power continuity.

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
  6. They tried this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they try this before a few years ago, called the 21CN? I think they ended up moving their data networks to it, but gave up on voice.

  7. Prson-State draws closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of England's VOIP data is hoovered by the NSA and passed on to MI5.

    What a free cuntry!

    1. Re:Prson-State draws closer by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Are you on VOIP? some characters did not come through...

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    2. Re:Prson-State draws closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of $country's VOIP data is hoovered by the $agency and passed on to $agency2.

      What a free $cuntry!

  8. POTS is by far an inferior technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to the high cost of copper, miles of a bundle of hundreds of copper wires, subject to crosstalk and imbalanced, is a much worse investment than coaxial and fiber hybrid network. POTS is well on its way out and is far inferior to coaxial and fiber technologies.

    Also, coaxial networks can carry power on the coaxial cable to power the VOIP adapter on the customer premises that connects to their two wire inside wiring. This has become more rare but some cable companies have done it. The coaxial distribution line running down the street already has DC on it to power the amplifiers. Multitaps can tap out some of this power and send it down to the customer. Cable companies seem to be opting for a battery back up inside the VOIP adapter and an AC adapter instead.

    1. Re: POTS is by far an inferior technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's privacy protection is superior to VoIP.

  9. VOIP != POTS by sjbe · · Score: 1

    That's not the end of land lines. It's the end of POTS service. You can have a land line that uses VOIP and doesn't require a general purpose internet connection. I've got one sitting right next to me in my office. It's a phone but it uses it's own routers and isn't connected to our office computer network in any meaningful way.

    1. Re: VOIP != POTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And The CIA doesnt need to contact anyone in your country to tap your phone. FancyBear too! HOW AWESOME!

    2. Re:VOIP != POTS by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      It might not require a 'general purpose' internet connection but it obviously does require an internet connection. [Shrugs.]

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  10. Too little, too late by u19925 · · Score: 1

    By 2025, no one will be using traditional voice phone, even for mobile. All communications will be via SSL via end to end encryption and majority will be via custom apps (WhatsApp, Snap, FaceTime etc). Numbers will be used only as an identifier for the source and target devices. Many people already prefer such apps over phone number as they don't want to share phone numbers. The apps provide much richer control than standard telephone provides. What we lack is standardization and legal aspects (I have to provide my phone number to all govt and private businesses).

    1. Re:Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By 2025, no one will be using traditional voice phone, even for mobile. All communications will be via SSL via end to end encryption and majority will be via custom apps (WhatsApp, Snap, FaceTime etc).

      Use voice over the public internet for my telephone calls? No thanks, I like my conversations to be free of dropouts and disconnections.

    2. Re:Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your calls go over public internet. Even for landline, only the connection from your device to the nearest exchange is over dedicated wires. All your cell phones voice is converted to the same data packets which is used for data. You are using VOIP all the time except that you don't know about it.

    3. Re:Too little, too late by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      This prediction makes Kurzweil seem sane. Simple and good enough almost always win out. That and the vast majority of people do not share that level of interest in privacy or security.

  11. Not surprising by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Here in Norway 85% of the PSTN/ISDN customers are gone since the peak in the early 2000s. Fiber is now biggest and growing, cable is second and holding steady through upgrades so replacing the last mile is not necessary while xDSL is third and dropping. Pretty much all new installations are now fiber, no matter who does it. Our main telecom operator already suggested this once before, I think mostly to see how much resistance they'd get and get the ball rolling. The problem are those where it's not cost effective to put fiber in the ground, but it was probably not cost effective to put copper in the ground either. I think that eventually we'll convert the requirement that you must deliver phone access (wireless service okay) into must deliver Internet access of a certain bandwidth/cap/quality. We still got at least 2-3 years of massive commercial roll-out before that though, let's see where we're at then.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. Legal implications? by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 2

    I know this story is about the UK, but clearly the US telecoms are moving to VOIP as well, and I wonder about the legal implications. If phone service is now considered an "online service", does the FOSTA/SESTA legislation apply to it? Will telecoms be required to monitor the content of phone calls in order to make sure that no one is committing a crime? How will this affect the ease with which LEOs can monitor or record your phone calls?

  13. Landline VoIP =/= GSM by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    Did all VoIP use GSM ? Didn't just use landline differently ?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  14. VOIP doesn't mean wireless? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Er "Landline"...means a phone connected to the wall.
    I have a VOIP phone on my desk - it's connected to the wall, it's still a landline despite being VOIP.
    "Switching to VOIP" doesn't mean "getting rid of landlines" at all.

    *PERSONALLY* while I can see the compelling reasons for not having essentially 3 parallel wire-systems to residences (phone, electrical, cable/internet), living in rural America where the power goes out at least a handful of times a year, we find it helpful to KEEP a pots phone account just as a backup for emergencies.*

    *for those who don't know, pots phones carry their OWN CURRENT; so even if power is out, you can still make calls (to say nothing of disregarding the congestion/power status of local cell towers)....at least up until the point that the local telco converts pots to VOIP at switch-stations.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:VOIP doesn't mean wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also makes for great fun in a thunderstorm!

  15. Collect Calls by FuzzyFox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Land lines can accept Collect Calls. Where the person calling you might be stuck in a situation where they are far away, and can't afford to pay for a call (such as a pay phone, stuck in a prison, in jail for some reason). They can ask the operator to reverse the charges, so that you, the one receiving the call, can talk to that person.

    VOIP phones don't have the billing infrastructure and laws/regulations that require they have this ability. As a result, loss of land lines means less and less ability for a family member to be able to reach you in an unexpectedly harsh emergency.

    The only reason I still have a land line is because this happened to me. A family member ended up in jail, and the only way that they were able to call and let me know was because I had a land line. If I hadn't had one, I suppose I would have found out... eventually? Somehow? It's hard to say.

    I really feel like we're losing something, and not many people are giving serious thought to this particular service, because it's so rarely used, and hard to predict what conditions would have to happen for it to be useful.

    --
    splunge (n) -- A good idea.. but it could be lousy... and I'm not being indecisive!
    1. Re:Collect Calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a free-to-call ("freephone") number via VoIP much cheaper than a landline here or here or here, for example.

  16. IPv6 or central PBX over VPN? by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    So... does this mean BT will actually introduce IPv6 for consumers or will it be a VPN type of deal for the VoIP channel and we'll still be praying for IPv6 in the year 3000?

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    1. Re:IPv6 or central PBX over VPN? by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      They've already deployed IPv6 to their entire consumer customer base.

      (Unfortunately the routers they used to give out don't do v6, so if you have a "Home Hub 5" or earlier then you'll need to get that replaced, which is why only 35% of their users are actually using v6 rather than the 93% or so that Sky are at. But they are in fact providing it.)

  17. Again, not sure about the UK by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but in America poor rural areas might be a couple weeks without power following a major disaster. Heck, parts of Puerto Rico still don't have power...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sucks if you care about connection reliability too: in the states the POTS landlines have a government mandated 5x9s of reliability while internet and power companies offer no guarantee and the government refuses to enforce any basic quality of service.

  19. Already off POTS here in NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a month ago I was given an adapter to plug into my VDSL router and told that the telephone exchange was being shut down. NZ has old neax exchanges that are not supported anymore. I think this will be pushed fairly quickly where they can in NZ so they can keep salvages exchange parts for rural exchanges.

    I have put my router on a UPS for the power cut issue,

    Apparently fibre will be here soon. the cable has been layed down the street.

  20. F U JELLO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such thing as a "LAN Line", you dumb bastard. "Land line" is the term your stupid ass didn't know.

  21. company's plans to move in a fibre network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well they better get a move on because the end level fibre coverage is awful in UK. Maybe they could fix the roads while they are at it.

  22. DID portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BT is just terrible about DID (phone number) portability. It's like pulling teeth from a shark. If they go VOIP, they really need to get their act together on DID portability.