Slashdot Mirror


Engineers Are Leaving America For Canada (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from a report via Bloomberg: The H-1B was created in 1990, part of an immigration overhaul signed into law by President George H.W. Bush that also created the EB-5 investor visa -- the subject of a fracas involving Kushner Cos. seeking Chinese investment -- and the diversity lottery, which Trump has attacked. Today, an estimated half a million H-1B holders live in the U.S. No one tracks exactly how many ditch their skilled visas for the permanent residency Canada offers, but during the first year of Trump's presidency, the number of tech professionals globally who got permanent residency in Canada ticked up almost 40 percent from 2016, to more than 11,000.

In 1967, Canada became the first country to adopt a points-based immigration system. The country regularly tweaks how it rates applicants based on national goals and research into what makes for successful integration: A job offer used to come with 600 points, but now it's worth just 200. Other factors like speaking fluent English or French -- or, even better, both -- have been given more weight over the years. Country of origin is irrelevant. In 2016, Canada increased national immigration levels to 300,000 new permanent residents annually. Last year, in consultation with trade groups, it created a program called the Global Skills Strategy to issue temporary work permits to people with job offers in certain categories, including senior software engineers, in as little as two weeks. Since the program started in June, more than 5,600 people have been granted permits, from the U.S., India, Pakistan, Brazil, and elsewhere.

32 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. I've always been confused by this by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've read multiple times that the H1-B program allows 85,000 applicants a year, but I've also read the half a million figure. Are they just not going home when their Visas are up? Are the Visas being issued for decades at a time so that they build up in the system? Or are they saying that most H1-B Visas are converted to permanent residency?

    One thing I can say: Companies stopped training once they could rely on the H1-B visa program. One more thing, I know two or three people who were laid off and replaced by H1-Bs, which is supposed to be illegal.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I've always been confused by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 85k number is NEW per year. They can stay for 7 years before they have to renew. I know several that are coming up on 10+ years. That is how you get to the several million. The current system depending on which country you are from it can take many years just to get the green card then a few more to convert. One guy I know did it all in 4 years. He was not from india. Another guy who sits next to him is coming up on 9 years trying to get a green card. Another guy I knew spent 3 years trying to get the company to sponsor his green card. The HR lady finally told him flat out 'we are not going to help you you are stuck here for as long as we like'. He quit that week and moved to canada that was 20 years ago.

      I just see blatant not going to hire you unless h1b ads. Companies do not care. They see it as a form of 'lock in' where they can basically bully people around for 7+ years. They see the rest of us as scum who will jump ship at any time. Well in that environment we do.

    2. Re:I've always been confused by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a correlation vs causation issue going on here. Companies didn't stop training because of H1-B's; they stopped training because higher numbers of college degrees floating around turned a ton of industries into Employer's Markets. H1-B's sped the process up, but this shit started before that. We have flooded job markets, few alternatives like manufacturing, and executives insist on boosting stock and getting their raises no matter what.

      End result is a lot of qualified people competing for the same jobs, which drives down wages. H1-B's are a pretty small part of that (albeit one that tends to make headlines when abused).

  2. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by approachingZero+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work with Indians from Bangalore at HP. They were working in India and then came to Boise for a week or two. I can't say I remember a single slight directed to them. Most development environments are populated almost exclusively by SJW progressives. How do you define 'rampant racism'.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  3. But... by jouassou · · Score: 2

    Isn't Canada also in America?

    1. Re:But... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll probably be modded down into oblivion for having a contrary opinion but I wish the USA would just get it over and annex Canada and Mexico already. Once people get over the knee-jerk reaction and actually think about what this would mean

      Unless you get their permission first (and you can't), what it would mean is war on at least two fronts, and probably more. Even assuming the USA can beat both countries militarily (and then occupy them successfully, despite a complete lack of moral legitimacy), it's unlikely the rest of the world would stand for the USA going full-Lebensraum on its neighbors and allies.

      At the very least, it would be extremely destabilizing, since every other major country would take it as signalling "open season" on their neighbors. Any semblance of diplomatic infrastructure more refined than "me want, me stronger, me take" would be destroyed for the forseeable future.

      It's unlikely the benefits of "a unified currency" would outweigh the drawbacks of "endless war".

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:But... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      A prime minister, a governor general and a queen

      That sounds like the beginning of a joke.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. Not a choice... by ark1 · · Score: 2

    The article is mostly about foreigners who can no longer get a permit to work in USA and have to "settle" for Canada. American and Canadian engineers can work on TN Visas which are much easier to obtain without number restrictions. I'm sure Canadian engineers heading down South for better pay and more opportunities still far outnumber American engineers moving North regardless of current Political situation.

  5. Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company does power and HVAC systems engineering for buildings. There is and has been a significant shortage of people in this field over the years (it has always paid less than high-tech and finance, and to really succeed you need the same personality and skill sets). You can't just increase pay, because the fees you can receive do not support paying someone straight out of college $85k/year, plus dedicating significant resources to training. It becomes a 2-5 year investment (more on the HVAC side).

    I had always been biased against the international masters students, as I generally found that they lacked some of the creativity that is required in our field. I have since been proven wrong, with two great hires recently.

    Unfortunately, unless they can have their PE and be paid $91k after 12 months now, they will not be eligible for an H1B. General wages start at $55-65k first year, $60-70k second year, and $68-85k third year. So, they will leave...

    This isn't smart policy. I understand the need to prevent companies like us using H1Bs to have someone work for $55,58,62...k and deprive good jobs for citizens, but keeping bright *young* people is a huge benefit. Instead, we hire and train people apuntil their F1(?) education expires, and they go home for a better job.

    1. Re:Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Again, speaking specifically to my field, the challenge is you lose the young ambitious people to other industries right out of school, which inherently limits your remaining pool. You then lose another 20-35% mid-career to either be with the kids, or go into sales or similar “related” field. Much of what you are left with are people that can execute, but lack management or creative thinking skills... and people that simply never really could do the job.

      The field is also plagued with boom and bust cycles, so larger companies that hire and fire based on demand (and reputation) dominate on margin, but screw over the industry.

      While we got by for years hiring “C-Team” players and building them into “B-Team,” it is only a formula to “get by” rather than actually prosper.

      A big part of the problem is cost of education, but simple things that can be done to address the problem would help; H1B is one of those things.

    2. Re:Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Not a technician... an engineer. There is a significant difference in skill sets. A technician in the field for decades might be able to follow a procedure quite effectively, but they struggle with defining problems.

      The cream of the crop in my field are traditionally from architectural engineering programs. These are kids that learn a great breadth of knowledge about how buildings and construction work. That is the skill set that is attractive to a number of other industries. Working at Deloitte or one of the other guys you need to be able to quickly get into depth with a new industry and that is where the background is sought after. The financial side I am less certain; fewer friends went that route. I believe many became quants, but broad industry analysts were popular.

      My particular industry is just a microcosm though. I am sure there are plenty of others with similar constraints.

      (On mentoring, most of our program is partnering one very green and one engineer with ~2 years experience under their belt with a senior engineer to work as a team. Information is shared as quickly as possible so the more junior people can move up. Unfortunately most of our people take a long time to ramp up, and we aren’t able to push the creative and management buttons as quickly as we would like. We do lunchtime training sessions and offer external classes as well. We could do more, but this is our practical limit.)

  6. First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone is looking to move up to do the best for their family. Indians to America. Syrians to Europe. Americas to Canada. Americans to Europe. The people first to move are the well educated with the capital to make such a move.

    I have my MS and my wife has her MD. As a whole we've debated what countries would be best for our kids and their kids. Universal health care, fewer school shoots, treating mental health like a mental and not judicial problem and a host of other differences. Yeah, it reflects our politics. But it's pretty apparent the US isn't going to be what we want for our grand kids and their grand kids.

    And you can save your breath, yelling at people on Facebook hasn't done anything either. I respect your opinion and your right to have your opinion, I want to live with people, like those in Canada or the Nordic states that share my opinion.

    1. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Everyone is looking to move up to do the best for their family. Indians to America. Syrians to Europe. Americas to Canada. Americans to Europe. The people first to move are the well educated with the capital to make such a move.

      Meh, that's a load of bullshit. They're extremely disproportionally young males allegedly under 18, the expendables of the family and not really educated for anything. Their mission is to anchor themselves as "children", get some menial work to send money back to their family and apply for family reunification. They might be doing it for the family's good but they're almost all a huge money sink on the receiving nation. Only those truly blinded by ideology manage to think otherwise.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Canada, speaking French requires fluency at a grade 12 level, unless you're from an undeveloped county. You also have to be able to write at the same level for it to apply. MD's are hard capped in Canada, and if you're using that as a basic you *must* take residency in the province or territory you're assigned to. You also must retake various tests to gain the right to open a practice in the province you're assigned to. That means, you might have your heard and dreams set on Toronto(ON) or Vancouver(BC), but you might be assigned to far northern Alberta with 3hrs of sunlight in the winter and 21hrs of daylight in the summer and be 12hrs from a city larger then 8k people for up to 5 years. You'll also have to re-take engineering certification tests here in Canada.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      fewer school shoots

      The death rate from school shootings in the US is ~20/year. (For comparison, the school-age population is 64,000,000.) That's above the crushed-by-vending-machine death rate (~3/year), but below the killed-by-dogs death rate (34/year), and far below the texting-while-driving death rate (6,000/year). (All figures for US only.)

      If the risk of school shootings is a serious factor in motivating you to move to another country, you should be *far* more motivated to move to a country that lacks mobile phones.

      (Numbers: 151 total deaths from school shootings in the 2010s thus far. 64,000,000 students in primary or secondary education. 1 in 112 million annual death rate from vending machines. Other death rates for dog attacks, texting while driving, etc.)

    4. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by kenh · · Score: 2

      You may have missed it, but my comment had links to the immigration requirements for Norway and Canada - my point remains, it isn't a matter of crossing the border, showing them your impressive US degrees, and they welcome you with open arms.

      The Canadian gov't tells doctors where to practice, for example. I encourage you to go into Mexico and apply for permission to just work there, let alone live there as anything other than a vacationing guest - they don't want you, they don't want to import workers, they want to export them so they can send hard currency back to relatives in Mexico. (I know you don't want to go to Mexico, but it's the closest example I know)

      --
      Ken
  7. Re:They're probably all Democrats by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where would they go, the US is the most right wing capitalist country in the world

    Singapore is a low-tax authoritarian country which spends little on social programs, spends robustly on their military, executes drug dealers, and they even spank petty criminals.

  8. Re:Oh Really? by unixisc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not just that, the immigrant engineers are leaving for Canada after the Trump administration decides that they want to adapt the same points based/merit based immigration system. If that's such a horrible concept, why are they leaving for a country that has exactly that?

    Also, in the above blurb on Canada, it also states that people have to know either English or French. That's very different from the immigration problem in the US, where people who speak only Spanish come in, w/ no intention of ever learning English

  9. No single reason by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2

    Let's face it: whatever technology lead the US used to have, it's gone, or about to in the coming years / decades. Just reading tech news regularly yields a # of reasons:

    * Housing prices in the Silicon Valley area.
    * Anti-immigration views displayed by the current US president (and quite a few of his followers).
    * The crazy Republicans vs. Democrats political situation.
    * Intellectual property hassles combined with a lawsuit-happy culture (with expensive lawyers as the cherry on top ;-).
    * Investments in fundamental R&D slipping (vs. other countries gearing up).
    * Silicon Valley itself turning from a brand-new-tech 'heaven' to a create-value-for-shareholders focus.
    * Other countries reaching a stage of development such that there are many tech centres to choose from (see eg. AI talent gathering in China).

    Just to name a few. Not saying the above is good or bad in itself... But if I were about to run a tech startup, rather than Silicon Valley I'd be looking to move to Hong Kong / Shenzhen area. Or even some lesser known place in say, Eastern Europe or South America, provided enough talent in the field & facilities / suppliers were already there.

    Get used to it, US! High tech is spreading around the world. :-)) Your days as top dog are numbered.

    1. Re:No single reason by molarmass192 · · Score: 2

      You're missing the single most important reason why SV is still "the place" as opposed to every other "tech hub" in the world. It's access to venture capital. Silicon Valley has something on order of 8x more venture capital spend than the next biggest "tech hub". That's not 10% or anything remotely within reach, that's 800% more than number 2. That VC money is the lifeblood of startups, it's what gets you to cashflow positive and allows you to grow your defensive moat against the competition. Until we see a whole lot more growth of VC money, as in multiples, in other markets, SV will remain on top.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  10. leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 2

    And in other news, California is experiencing an exodus. And it's mostly the middle class that's fleeing progressive California.

    1. Re:leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not really, foreign immigration makes up for the Americans that can't cut it in CA and leave for red states :D

      With one of the highest rates of income inequality and poverty in the nation, it looks like California is becoming a state of ultra-wealthy tech overlords and their foreign slave labor. Yeah, anybody with a choice doesn't want to be part of such a dysfunctional social structure. And the irony is that these people still blame conservatives for the massive inequality, racism, and poverty in California.

  11. Re:where are these jobs? by dk20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Canadian who lived in the US for ~4 years before returning to canada.. Running back for health care would be hard. after 183 days outside the country they cancel it on you.

    "All provinces, except Ontario and Newfoundland, require you to actually live in your home province for at least six months plus a day (183 days in most years) in order to be considered a permanent resident of that province, and therefore qualified for provincial health insurance (medicare) benefits. That means actually residing in your home province and being able to prove it, if necessary, not simply owning a residence there and living in Portugal, Mexico or California for eight or nine months."

  12. Merit-based Immigration by kenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In 1967, Canada became the first country to adopt a points-based immigration system.

    So fifty years after Canada implements a merit-based (AKA points-based) immigration policy America-hating Americans attack President Trump and his administration as being anti-immigrant by proposing a similar immigration program. (Apparently the only good immigration program is one that increases the absolute number of immigrants admitted into the country annually...)

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Merit-based Immigration by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Australia and NZ also have similar systems, but progressives in the US claim that it's racist for Trump wanting to have it as you pointed out. But they'll laud the immigration system in all three countries as great. Considering the absolute shitshow going on up here in Canada right now? There's a lot of angry people, and you're hearing a lot of "maybe Japans immigration system is better."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  13. Re:Oh Really? by mejustme · · Score: 2

    In both Canasta and the US, people who are qualified are unemployed while I can't find qualified candidates.

    If only corporations were more open to remote workers versus insisting that people be sitting in the head office between 9am-5pm. That is the main problem I'm currently facing, trying to find work in my relatively small city. Lots of work...as long as I'm willing to move to one of the large cities where the cost-of-living is so high I cannot afford a decent house, much less a nice place to raise my children.

  14. Re: Oh Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The whole USA was a hostile invasion to begin with.

  15. Re:Oh Really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Canada has a more attractive system because there is a better path to citizenship and family reunion.

    Some people (not just in the US, in the UK too) seem to think that they can just get people in for a few years and then send them home. Good people won't come on those terms.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  16. Re:Oh Really? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 2

    > they chose a country that is more difficult to enter legally than the US

    Canada has a population of 30 million and brings in 300,000 a year, so that's 1%

    The US has a population of 325 million and brings in 1.5 million a year, so that's 0.5%

    So Canada is twice as easy to get into, legally.

  17. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by lamer01 · · Score: 2

    correction: They want the best cheap engineers

  18. Re:They're probably all Democrats by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    I know someone in Africa who worked until he could afford a juice cart. Finally he started to make a living for his family. That lasted a few months and warlords came and shot up his town. Possessions were taken, along with his juice cart. This is the world libertarians will have us in. Giving absolute power to people with no legal structure for which to obtain that power in is an absolute disaster every time. Worse than capitalism.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  19. Re:Oh Really? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    I've worked with good people in India, but large companies aren't getting those people at 1/10 the pay. Those people in my experience are really just capable of following direct orders so they need someone to direct things. I've been told it's because people with 'skills' quickly want to become part of management because of social status but I don't know how true this is.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.