Slashdot Mirror


Engineers Are Leaving America For Canada (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from a report via Bloomberg: The H-1B was created in 1990, part of an immigration overhaul signed into law by President George H.W. Bush that also created the EB-5 investor visa -- the subject of a fracas involving Kushner Cos. seeking Chinese investment -- and the diversity lottery, which Trump has attacked. Today, an estimated half a million H-1B holders live in the U.S. No one tracks exactly how many ditch their skilled visas for the permanent residency Canada offers, but during the first year of Trump's presidency, the number of tech professionals globally who got permanent residency in Canada ticked up almost 40 percent from 2016, to more than 11,000.

In 1967, Canada became the first country to adopt a points-based immigration system. The country regularly tweaks how it rates applicants based on national goals and research into what makes for successful integration: A job offer used to come with 600 points, but now it's worth just 200. Other factors like speaking fluent English or French -- or, even better, both -- have been given more weight over the years. Country of origin is irrelevant. In 2016, Canada increased national immigration levels to 300,000 new permanent residents annually. Last year, in consultation with trade groups, it created a program called the Global Skills Strategy to issue temporary work permits to people with job offers in certain categories, including senior software engineers, in as little as two weeks. Since the program started in June, more than 5,600 people have been granted permits, from the U.S., India, Pakistan, Brazil, and elsewhere.

164 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. I've always been confused by this by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've read multiple times that the H1-B program allows 85,000 applicants a year, but I've also read the half a million figure. Are they just not going home when their Visas are up? Are the Visas being issued for decades at a time so that they build up in the system? Or are they saying that most H1-B Visas are converted to permanent residency?

    One thing I can say: Companies stopped training once they could rely on the H1-B visa program. One more thing, I know two or three people who were laid off and replaced by H1-Bs, which is supposed to be illegal.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I've always been confused by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They last for six years and there are a bunch of extensions available. 85,000 * 6 is 510,000 which is where you get the half million figure from.

    2. Re:I've always been confused by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 85k number is NEW per year. They can stay for 7 years before they have to renew. I know several that are coming up on 10+ years. That is how you get to the several million. The current system depending on which country you are from it can take many years just to get the green card then a few more to convert. One guy I know did it all in 4 years. He was not from india. Another guy who sits next to him is coming up on 9 years trying to get a green card. Another guy I knew spent 3 years trying to get the company to sponsor his green card. The HR lady finally told him flat out 'we are not going to help you you are stuck here for as long as we like'. He quit that week and moved to canada that was 20 years ago.

      I just see blatant not going to hire you unless h1b ads. Companies do not care. They see it as a form of 'lock in' where they can basically bully people around for 7+ years. They see the rest of us as scum who will jump ship at any time. Well in that environment we do.

    3. Re:I've always been confused by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a correlation vs causation issue going on here. Companies didn't stop training because of H1-B's; they stopped training because higher numbers of college degrees floating around turned a ton of industries into Employer's Markets. H1-B's sped the process up, but this shit started before that. We have flooded job markets, few alternatives like manufacturing, and executives insist on boosting stock and getting their raises no matter what.

      End result is a lot of qualified people competing for the same jobs, which drives down wages. H1-B's are a pretty small part of that (albeit one that tends to make headlines when abused).

    4. Re:I've always been confused by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know two or three people who were laid off and replaced by H1-Bs, which is supposed to be illegal.

      That ought to be a $1 million dollar fine per violation with 20% or $200,000 per fine going to the one who reported it. You will see how quickly companies stop doing that.

  2. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by approachingZero+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work with Indians from Bangalore at HP. They were working in India and then came to Boise for a week or two. I can't say I remember a single slight directed to them. Most development environments are populated almost exclusively by SJW progressives. How do you define 'rampant racism'.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  3. But... by jouassou · · Score: 2

    Isn't Canada also in America?

    1. Re:But... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Isn't Canada also in America?

      No, Canada is in North America, or if one wants to refer to the superset continent, Canda is in the Americas. Not America, which is an alternate way of saying 'the US'.

    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canada doesn't have a president you tool.

    3. Re:But... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll probably be modded down into oblivion for having a contrary opinion but I wish the USA would just get it over and annex Canada and Mexico already. Once people get over the knee-jerk reaction and actually think about what this would mean

      Unless you get their permission first (and you can't), what it would mean is war on at least two fronts, and probably more. Even assuming the USA can beat both countries militarily (and then occupy them successfully, despite a complete lack of moral legitimacy), it's unlikely the rest of the world would stand for the USA going full-Lebensraum on its neighbors and allies.

      At the very least, it would be extremely destabilizing, since every other major country would take it as signalling "open season" on their neighbors. Any semblance of diplomatic infrastructure more refined than "me want, me stronger, me take" would be destroyed for the forseeable future.

      It's unlikely the benefits of "a unified currency" would outweigh the drawbacks of "endless war".

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:But... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You might want to join him, since Canada has anything but a president. A prime minister, a governor general and a queen, but no president!

    5. Re:But... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      ...having a unified currency, logistics, roads, units, language, military, border, etc. would provide numerous long term benefits...

      Which units? US or SI?

      Which language? English, French, or Spanish?

      ...(Some) Americans are pretty hypocritical about immigration considering they hijacked the land from the native Americans...

      There's also the fact that about 99% of their ancestors were... that's right... immigrants.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:But... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, you are

    7. Re:But... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Well, depending on the situation we have either a Governor General or the queen. The GG is "viceregal in absentia" so they (as an office) cease to exist when the monarch is present.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    8. Re:But... by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      Makes no sense. Once conditions turn bad enough that another civil war breaks out in the USA, wouldn't you *want* neighbouring countries to provide food & ammo while you're busy shooting each other? (no need for more guns I assume)

      </sarcasm>

    9. Re:But... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but still, no president! Which was my (and others') original point to someone who chose to correct someone else

    10. Re:But... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      In some countries of the world (including France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Romania, Greece, and the countries of Latin America), America is considered a continent encompassing the North America and South America subcontinents,[23][24] as well as Central America.[25][26][27][28][29]

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:But... by xvan · · Score: 1

      Using Wikipedia as an authority source...
      Both sides of can play the same game

    12. Re:But... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      A prime minister, a governor general and a queen

      That sounds like the beginning of a joke.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the Archives:

      Subject: Re: a basic question on peace
      From: warlock@nortel.ca (Jacky Mallett)
      Newsgroups: soc.religion.quaker

      Guy Macon wrote:
      > Notice the size of the armies that Mexico and Canada have to
      > meet the constant threat of a U.S. invasion. Why so small?
      >

      Newsflash. Ottawa, January 2013

      Ottawa Quakers called for donations today to an emergency snowsuit fund
      for american soldiers, as the latest wave of invaders was stalled
      by a snowstorm outside Toronto. As american tanks were halted by massive
      snowdrifts on the 417, the RCMP denied that it has been assisting american
      marines with directions to Ottawa. "I told them it was near Toronto", said
      one RCMP officer, "but they said they knew that already".

      Canadian meterologists dismissed claims by the US military that winter
      temperatures of -20 and below were unusually cold. 'If they think that's bad,
      wait until they get to Calgary' one senior meterologist commented. Meanwhile
      the Ontario government announced that savings in the snow removal fund
      caused by the american invasion would be used to cover additional social
      assistance costs for new canadian citizens.

      A total of 10,000 US soldiers have now accepted canadian citizenship
      as part of the invasion response program. The package which offers
      immediate citizenship for soldiers and their families, including all
      health costs, membership of the canadian pension fund, free education,
      housing and a resettlement allowance for the west coast, has been extremely
      popular with the older rank and file.

      The success of the program is being attributed in part to local relief
      efforts to assist american soldiers poorly prepared for winter conditions.
      As local towns provided hot food and blankets to the troops, american GI's
      were amazed by canadian hospitality. "These people are really nice", said
      one GI who reported being shot at during one holiday in Chicago.
      Reports that the high rate of breakdown experienced by american troop
      carriers was due to bottles of blue coloured water labelled anti-freeze
      being distributed to canadian petrol stations were strenously denied by
      the Canadian government. 'Mislabelling of consumer products can be
      extremely dangerous, and will be prosecuted under the Sale of Goods Act',
      stated an official.

      Meanwhile in Florida, the takeover of the state government by Canadian
      Snowbirds has continued into its third week. Attempts by the national
      guard to move in were blocked by senior citizens who have built an ice rink
      on the main freeways using snowmakers smuggled in from Quebec. "They just
      don't have any winter driving experience down here, eh", said one pensioner,
      armed with a submachine gun bought at a local gun store. Concerns raised
      by Congress over the availability of weapons to foreign nationals, were
      condemned by Florida gun shop owners as 'anti-competitive'.

      European observers have expressed surprise over the latest american agression,
      so soon after the acknowledged fiasco of the recent Mexican takeover. Relief
      efforts in San Diego are continuing after the massive exodus from Mexico
      City to California. Immigration officials stated they were unable to
      stop mexican-americans from traveling north in search of work now that
      the border has been dismantled.

      In Washington today, Senate members called for emergency debate as
      opinion polls for the Presidential elections continued to show the Mayor
      of Mexico city in first place, with 98% support amongst the mexican community.
      State officials have acknowledged that granting US citizenship to all mexicans
      immediately following the takeover may have been premature. ;-)

      --
      Moderators accept or reject articles based solely on the criteria posted
      in the Frequently Asked Questions. Article content is the responsibility
      of the submitter. Submit articles to ahbou-sub@acpub.duke.edu. To write
      to the moderators, send mail to ahbou-mod@acpub.duke.edu.

    14. Re:But... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      And even more often, right.

    15. Re:But... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      It's been tried, war of 1812. They invented the phrase "white wash" from trying to hide the battle damage to the white house. Also you'd end up with a 30 million lefty voting block (from Canada) and no reason for corporations to keep jobs north of Mexico city.

    16. Re:But... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Which units? US or SI?

      /sarcasm Gee, if only someone would invent dual signage .. it would solve the problem of foreigners not understanding the local system and locals would eventually learn to understand a foreign measurement.
        What a concept! Nah, that would never work ...

      ... albeit it would need several transition phases.

      > Which language? English, French, or Spanish?

      /sarcasm It's too bad NO other country has figured this out. I wish there was a to write laws in multiple languages ... maybe someone who specialized in understand multiple languages and could read/write. Nah, that would never work ...

    17. Re:But... by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      ..., while they complain endlessly when they see a mere fraction of the immigrants America sees annually.

      Somewhere above someone posted figures showing Canada has double the annual per capita immigration rate than does the US (1% vs 0.5% respectively). However, they misstated the Canadian population as 30 million vs. the actual number of 36.3 million, so the actual immigration rates are closer.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    18. Re: But... by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      You kidding me?

      Canadians would roll over and apologize to any invading American forces. The type of people who would put up a fight are the guys who live up in the bush. Fought with a bunch of them in Iraq.

      Then again, put them in charge and they'd probably welcome not having to watch their country get ruined by idiots like Trudeau.

      You'd have a real insurgency by cartel forces down in Mexico. The only way to win there would be out right genocide.

    19. Re:But... by rbrander · · Score: 1

      > A President ...is the actual joke though.

    20. Re: But... by hardluck86 · · Score: 1

      I think you need to pay better attention to Canadian Forces fighting record and Canadians in general.
      We punch way above our weight class and have done so since long before WWI.

      Some historical context:
      From Captain J.B. Paulin in a speech given at the Empire Club of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, on May 23, 1918.

      "The officer to whom I previously referred said, "There seems to be a fear back here in Canada that the Germans are going to make a frontal attack upon the Canadians, but the Canadians at the Front are afraid they won't (laughter) and," he continued, "they will get the biggest reception they ever got and pay the biggest price"; and it is interesting to us to know that the only part of the line that the Canadians fought for so strenuously and won which is still in the hands of the Allies, is that which is being held by the Canadians themselves. (Applause.) They are called "The storm troops of the British Empire" by the Kaiser, and his own "storm troops" are the biggest men of his various divisions; and when he speaks of the Canadians as being the "storm troops," it means that in his estimation, they are the best troops of the British Empire. I think the Kaiser has come more nearly to the truth there than he has ever done in anything else."

      And this:
      "THE CANADIANS WERE MARKED OUT AS STORM TROOPS; FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE WAR THEY WERE BROUGHT IN TO HEAD THE ASSAULT IN ONE GREAT BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER. WHENEVER THE GERMANS FOUND THE CANADIAN CORPS COMING INTO THE LINE THEY PREPARED FOR THE WORST."

      --BRITISH PRIME MINISTER LLOYD GEORGE, AFTER THE CAPTURE OF VIMY RIDGE

      And that history has continued in every military engagement we've been involved in since then.

      So, we are nice and polite to people who treat us well.
      But don't piss us off - we WILL fuck you up.

    21. Re:But... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      At the very least, it would be extremely destabilizing,

      Isn't that one of the primary goals of this current government?

      Replace all science with anti science leaders.
      Reverse the trade practices that America spent years building.
      Piss on the relationships that America spent years building.
      Constantly berate a nuclear power.

      It would be perfectly consistent to start a war with an ally.

    22. Re:But... by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 1

      I'll probably be modded down into oblivion for having a contrary opinion but I wish the USA would just get it over and annex Canada and Mexico already. Once people get over the knee-jerk reaction and actually think about what this would mean

      Unless you get their permission first (and you can't), what it would mean is war on at least two fronts, and probably more.

      It's more likely the us splits apart and pieces join canada . There are plenty of people on the west coast who'd be fine with joining Canada. It can't happen because of needing congressional approval. Can we imagine a scenario where say Trump is impeached and there are riots all around the us, and then southern states succeed to protect slavery, i mean the right of idiots like trump to be our president. It could happen.

    23. Re: But... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Units and language? Fuck off. Switch to metric for starters. Secondly, in a few years, Spanish will be your fucking majority language. Fuck that.

    24. Re: But... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I don't think you know how much Canadian grown citizens value their Canadian identity vs US. I grew up in a Canadian town that was a US base in WWII and is largely built upon the American dollars that built that town. While we share a certain pride of helping our allies, it's really our allegiance to Canada and Britain than with the US. If US wanted to DISCUSS terms of joining without force, we'd sure show up at the table. But if someone said, "US is taking over Canada", the reaction will be "fuck that shit, over my dead body".

    25. Re: But... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Fucking moron, you're the one that brought up unified language. Just turtles all the way down with you.

    26. Re: But... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      How exactly is US protecting Canada? US policy says it won't protect Canada against missile strikes. I think you're mistaken as to who protects who. Protip: we got the motherfucking north bordering against Russia, not Mexico, a fucking ally. More Trump style made up shit about Canada.

    27. Re: But... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I remember in my Canadian textbook doing a unit on Latin America, a conversation where an Us kid says to a Latin American kid that he was "American" and the Latin American said "so am I". My takeaway is that Latin Americans felt butthurt about Canada and Americans not thinking of Latin Americans as American.

    28. Re: But... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > unified language

      unify != one.

      >> albeit it would need several transition phases

      /sarcasm Reading, what a concept!

    29. Re:But... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I'll probably be modded down into oblivion for having a contrary opinion but I wish the USA would just get it over and annex Canada and Mexico already. Once people get over the knee-jerk reaction and actually think about what this would mean

      Unless you get their permission first (and you can't), what it would mean is war on at least two fronts, and probably more. Even assuming the USA can beat both countries militarily (and then occupy them successfully, despite a complete lack of moral legitimacy), it's unlikely the rest of the world would stand for the USA going full-Lebensraum on its neighbors and allies.

      This, you invade Canada, you're asking for war with the entire Commonwealth. This means millions of pissed off Scots and Australians, which should be enough on its own but not to mention the South Africans (who all have claimed to have killed at least one person in self defence), India, New Zealanders (they'll bring the sandwiches), England, Northern Ireland, Wales and a host of other nations.

      The UK being involved, you can guarantee that we'll drag the French and Germans into it (they both still owe us for the war). Along with them will be the Spanish and Italians (they may not do much, but will look good whilst doing it). Meanwhile, where will the US turn to for allies, China? Russia? I don't think they'll be rushing to help.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    30. Re: But... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Per capital? What is the point of that metric in this discussion?

      Fourth people show up at the Canadian border and the Canadians act like they are being invaded - 1,500 Central Americans march towards the US border and we are called racists for pointing out it will cause problems...

      Did you also know that by agreement between the US and Canada, asylum seekers that cross the southern border from Mexico into the us, then work their way across the us Canada border get returned to the US, since that was the first country they entered - therefore asylum seekers/refugees that sneak across our northern border into Canada get 'deported' back to the US.

      --
      Ken
    31. Re: But... by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the problem actually. The Third Safe Country agreement between the US was supposed to deal with this problem, but it has a big loophole: it only applies to people arriving at official border crossings.

      This is why there is such a hullabaloo about families deliberately stepping just across the border at Roxham Road, in full view of RCMP officers, and yards away from the official crossing at Lacolle. They are instantly arrested, but they then can claim asylum as the Third Safe Country agreement doesn't apply.

      Also, it's a bit more than four: it averaged about 55 a day last year, totaling 20,593 just crossing between official border stations. This year, numbers are about the same -- 1970 in March, for example ( https://www.canada.ca/en/immig... ).

      Canada has been granting asylum to about 50% of them at the moment.

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    32. Re: But... by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      The reason the per capita (not "capital") number is important is because these immigrants have to be absorbed into society. If Canada accepted as many immigrants as the US in absolute numbers, it couldn't cope with the demands of all of the newcomers all at once.

      However, Canada is growing much faster from migration than the US (0.57% vs 0.39%) according to the CIA Factbook https://www.cia.gov/library/pu... .

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
  4. Re: The real reason the engineers are leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah because the Indian takover at places like microsoft doesn't have its own pro Indian racism.

    Hypocrite

  5. Not a choice... by ark1 · · Score: 2

    The article is mostly about foreigners who can no longer get a permit to work in USA and have to "settle" for Canada. American and Canadian engineers can work on TN Visas which are much easier to obtain without number restrictions. I'm sure Canadian engineers heading down South for better pay and more opportunities still far outnumber American engineers moving North regardless of current Political situation.

  6. Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company does power and HVAC systems engineering for buildings. There is and has been a significant shortage of people in this field over the years (it has always paid less than high-tech and finance, and to really succeed you need the same personality and skill sets). You can't just increase pay, because the fees you can receive do not support paying someone straight out of college $85k/year, plus dedicating significant resources to training. It becomes a 2-5 year investment (more on the HVAC side).

    I had always been biased against the international masters students, as I generally found that they lacked some of the creativity that is required in our field. I have since been proven wrong, with two great hires recently.

    Unfortunately, unless they can have their PE and be paid $91k after 12 months now, they will not be eligible for an H1B. General wages start at $55-65k first year, $60-70k second year, and $68-85k third year. So, they will leave...

    This isn't smart policy. I understand the need to prevent companies like us using H1Bs to have someone work for $55,58,62...k and deprive good jobs for citizens, but keeping bright *young* people is a huge benefit. Instead, we hire and train people apuntil their F1(?) education expires, and they go home for a better job.

    1. Re:Brain Drain is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sure yeah whatever. I have seen plenty of bright well trained citizens laid off in favor of H1B hires. Apparently they made too much money, or were not young enough, didn't graduate from the right school, or didn't check some identity box. Sorry you couldn't find an HVAC engineer - maybe you didn't try hard enough. Or maybe your standards were too low. Or your job description required something no American grad could achieve - genetically.

    2. Re:Brain Drain is coming by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Most advanced nations fix that with technical training over decades. They can then fill any skill shortage with short term visa workers with actual skills.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Brain Drain is coming by kenh · · Score: 1

      My company does power and HVAC systems engineering for buildings. There is and has been a significant shortage of people in this field over the years

      Please describe your company's mentorship/training programs to address this shortage...

      (it has always paid less than high-tech and finance, and to really succeed you need the same personality and skill sets)

      Yeah right, being an HVAC technician requires the exact same skill set as a career in finance and/or high-tech.

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:Brain Drain is coming by hdyoung · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that our visa system is messed up. We benefit in the long run if we can bring the best and brightest from abroad into this country, and keep them here permanently. We should acknowledge that this will actually make life a tad harder for the bright people already here, due to increased competition. It's worth it in the long run.
      However, I also detect an undertone of this: "Gee, I would really like to have top notch people in the top 5% of the human population in terms of technical skills, But I want to pay them barely enough to be in the middle class." Sorry, the business types can wish for this all they want. Not gonna happen. Top skills demand either top dollar or other sweet perks that make up for a lower salary. Get over it, and fork out the pay necessary to hire the skills you need. Or make due with lower skilled workers and pay them less. Pick one.

    5. Re:Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Again, speaking specifically to my field, the challenge is you lose the young ambitious people to other industries right out of school, which inherently limits your remaining pool. You then lose another 20-35% mid-career to either be with the kids, or go into sales or similar “related” field. Much of what you are left with are people that can execute, but lack management or creative thinking skills... and people that simply never really could do the job.

      The field is also plagued with boom and bust cycles, so larger companies that hire and fire based on demand (and reputation) dominate on margin, but screw over the industry.

      While we got by for years hiring “C-Team” players and building them into “B-Team,” it is only a formula to “get by” rather than actually prosper.

      A big part of the problem is cost of education, but simple things that can be done to address the problem would help; H1B is one of those things.

    6. Re:Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Not a technician... an engineer. There is a significant difference in skill sets. A technician in the field for decades might be able to follow a procedure quite effectively, but they struggle with defining problems.

      The cream of the crop in my field are traditionally from architectural engineering programs. These are kids that learn a great breadth of knowledge about how buildings and construction work. That is the skill set that is attractive to a number of other industries. Working at Deloitte or one of the other guys you need to be able to quickly get into depth with a new industry and that is where the background is sought after. The financial side I am less certain; fewer friends went that route. I believe many became quants, but broad industry analysts were popular.

      My particular industry is just a microcosm though. I am sure there are plenty of others with similar constraints.

      (On mentoring, most of our program is partnering one very green and one engineer with ~2 years experience under their belt with a senior engineer to work as a team. Information is shared as quickly as possible so the more junior people can move up. Unfortunately most of our people take a long time to ramp up, and we aren’t able to push the creative and management buttons as quickly as we would like. We do lunchtime training sessions and offer external classes as well. We could do more, but this is our practical limit.)

    7. Re:Brain Drain is coming by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My company does power and HVAC systems engineering for buildings. There is and has been a significant shortage of people in this field over the years (it has always paid less than high-tech and finance, and to really succeed you need the same personality and skill sets). You can't just increase pay, because the fees you can receive do not support paying someone straight out of college $85k/year, plus dedicating significant resources to training. It becomes a 2-5 year investment (more on the HVAC side).

      Of course you can. Power and HVAC systems engineering can't just be skipped, buildings have to have those things, so the market will pay whatever the going rate is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Brain Drain is coming by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      I worked finance for a decade. It was filled with physicists, mathematicians and engineers. And in one case, a classic French poetry critic.

      In any event, it remains the largest collection of smart people I've seen, and that includes university research departments.

    9. Re:Brain Drain is coming by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Heh... no, not really. The problem is the commodity work pays dirt, and what is commodity keeps expanding. It used to be that we could command 8-10% of construction costs as MEP fees, where the broader market is close to 1%. The pressures towards commodity are stronger than the volume value proposition of people that know their shit. It means I can charge triple my normal billing rate to fix things, but those hours are limited.

  7. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where would they go, the US is the most right wing capitalist country in the world even with the Dems in control.

    In the UK where I'm from we got a massive increase in Left Wing university professors when Trump got elected so I wouldn't be surprised.

  8. First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone is looking to move up to do the best for their family. Indians to America. Syrians to Europe. Americas to Canada. Americans to Europe. The people first to move are the well educated with the capital to make such a move.

    I have my MS and my wife has her MD. As a whole we've debated what countries would be best for our kids and their kids. Universal health care, fewer school shoots, treating mental health like a mental and not judicial problem and a host of other differences. Yeah, it reflects our politics. But it's pretty apparent the US isn't going to be what we want for our grand kids and their grand kids.

    And you can save your breath, yelling at people on Facebook hasn't done anything either. I respect your opinion and your right to have your opinion, I want to live with people, like those in Canada or the Nordic states that share my opinion.

    1. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Read the usernames. Nat all members of the 10100 Digit (binary) UID Club are the same.

    2. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I feel bad that you have MS. Get better!!!

    3. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Everyone is looking to move up to do the best for their family. Indians to America. Syrians to Europe. Americas to Canada. Americans to Europe. The people first to move are the well educated with the capital to make such a move.

      Meh, that's a load of bullshit. They're extremely disproportionally young males allegedly under 18, the expendables of the family and not really educated for anything. Their mission is to anchor themselves as "children", get some menial work to send money back to their family and apply for family reunification. They might be doing it for the family's good but they're almost all a huge money sink on the receiving nation. Only those truly blinded by ideology manage to think otherwise.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by kenh · · Score: 1

      I want to live with people, like those in Canada or the Nordic states that share my opinion.

      Please, describe the immigration process for moving to Canada or "the Nordic states" permanently... It doesn't appear you can just "decide" to immigrate to any country you choose.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Go to Google. Type "Emigrate to [country]". They all have their own nuances.

      With a MS in engineering and an MD we both qualify as skilled workers. She additionally speaks French, or enough to qualify for points. We also have more than enough saved up to meet the requirements of countries that have 'savings' requirements.

    6. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by dskoll · · Score: 1

      The NHS may be a mess, but the Canadian healthcare system is great. We spend much less per capita than in the US and have greater life expectancy and lower infant mortality rates.

    7. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by dskoll · · Score: 1

      Please provide evidence that God and all those other things you mentioned are correlated with better mental health outcomes. My opinion is that belief in God is evidence of a mental health issue just as much as a belief in fairies or unicorns would be.

    8. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by dskoll · · Score: 1

      Also, by the way, in Canada the government funds medical care, but is NOT involved in medical decisions. Those are done by doctors, who are NOT government employees. (They either have their own private practices or work for hospitals.)

    9. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's quite plausible that certain socially-acceptable delusions could benefit mental health. A church can provide an effective tight-knit support community and increase social contact. Or perhaps belief in a loving God and promised afterlife acts to shield people from the depressing apathy of the universe and their own inevitable cessation. The beliefs need not be actually true to be beneficial. They just need to be common enough that society won't reject them as crazy.

    10. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Canada, speaking French requires fluency at a grade 12 level, unless you're from an undeveloped county. You also have to be able to write at the same level for it to apply. MD's are hard capped in Canada, and if you're using that as a basic you *must* take residency in the province or territory you're assigned to. You also must retake various tests to gain the right to open a practice in the province you're assigned to. That means, you might have your heard and dreams set on Toronto(ON) or Vancouver(BC), but you might be assigned to far northern Alberta with 3hrs of sunlight in the winter and 21hrs of daylight in the summer and be 12hrs from a city larger then 8k people for up to 5 years. You'll also have to re-take engineering certification tests here in Canada.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Medical decisions are triaged by government, and they can and do refuse medical treatment for people. On top of that healthcare is fully rationed depending on a persons need for it. There's a court case at the Supreme Court of Canada right now about a guy being denied treatment, and the only other effective option he was given was medically assisted suicide despite his desire to live.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      On average, about 50 people are killed by lightning in the US each year. So far in 2018, 28 people have been killed in school shootings in the US.

      Ah, but how many people are killed by lightning in schools each year?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      A mistake I've maid to The other member of the club is a right dickhead.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Same situation in the UK now. Brexit, a hostile environment and poor economic prospects. Engineers are leaving, and there is a sense of urgency because the future is so uncertain.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      fewer school shoots

      The death rate from school shootings in the US is ~20/year. (For comparison, the school-age population is 64,000,000.) That's above the crushed-by-vending-machine death rate (~3/year), but below the killed-by-dogs death rate (34/year), and far below the texting-while-driving death rate (6,000/year). (All figures for US only.)

      If the risk of school shootings is a serious factor in motivating you to move to another country, you should be *far* more motivated to move to a country that lacks mobile phones.

      (Numbers: 151 total deaths from school shootings in the 2010s thus far. 64,000,000 students in primary or secondary education. 1 in 112 million annual death rate from vending machines. Other death rates for dog attacks, texting while driving, etc.)

    16. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And you can save your breath

      You really didn't read the whole thing?

      You seem like high income individuals, you cant afford your own?

      We absolutely can afford our own. But we can't guarantee our descendants will be in the same financial situation. If they don't end up in the same high paying jobs we want them to be able to get health care.

      Universal health care means government run health care which means you have bureaucrats making decisions.

      Yeah, because the capitalistic "Are we sure curing people is long term profitable" is working so well.

      trashing God, morality, the bible, religion, respect and loyalty to our country, personality responsibility

      Oh fuck off. Northern Europe is mostly agnostic and doesn't seem to have the issues the US has. The most religious regions, the South, seems to have the most issues. Rural Alabama looks like a 3rd world country, hook worms and all.
       

    17. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Grandparents, cousins, family. The same reasons holding most other people back from leaving.

    18. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      We're intelligent enough to have made it through med school and engineering school and you think we haven't been doing our due diligence in researching giving up our US citizenship?

      Please, continue to go on about all of the issues that may come up.

      open a practice

      She's not in private practice. There are more doctors than outpatient. Underserved communities in Canada look a lot like the underserved communities in the US.

      your heard and dreams set

      God no. For the same reason we don't go to NY, California, or Seattle. We honeymooned around Georgian Bay, in November.

      You'll also have to re-take engineering certification tests here in Canada.

      And? Do you think that this is some novel and new piece of information?

    19. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

      Well, in "non-heathy" environments, belief in God is reportedly correlated to happiness:

      https://www.psychologytoday.co...

      --
      No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    20. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Missed opportunity for "Ash vs Evil" last week.

    21. Re:First to leave other countries as well. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      you think we haven't been doing our due diligence in researching giving up our US citizenship?

      Apparently so, otherwise you'd know that it takes upwards of 20 years to get citizenship in Canada. That's on average 5 years longer then it takes in the US with the exceptionally loose immigration policies you now have.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    22. Re: First to leave other countries as well. by kenh · · Score: 2

      You may have missed it, but my comment had links to the immigration requirements for Norway and Canada - my point remains, it isn't a matter of crossing the border, showing them your impressive US degrees, and they welcome you with open arms.

      The Canadian gov't tells doctors where to practice, for example. I encourage you to go into Mexico and apply for permission to just work there, let alone live there as anything other than a vacationing guest - they don't want you, they don't want to import workers, they want to export them so they can send hard currency back to relatives in Mexico. (I know you don't want to go to Mexico, but it's the closest example I know)

      --
      Ken
  9. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No one wants the best Indian engineers. They want the best engineers. Skin != skill. But it's 2018, that attitude of not judging based on skin color or race is now somehow racist.

  10. Re:They're probably all Democrats by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where would they go, the US is the most right wing capitalist country in the world

    Singapore is a low-tax authoritarian country which spends little on social programs, spends robustly on their military, executes drug dealers, and they even spank petty criminals.

  11. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by davecb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Also the anti-female and anti-black racism. As a old pink guy in Canada, it's way easier to have a life in Canada than the United States, because you don't have to hate folks who look suspiciously like you.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  12. Re:Oh Really? by davecb · · Score: 1

    So why did a Canadian engineer recently start at my US-based company? When I asked him about it he said that he was having too much trouble finding work in Canada lately.

    Bad HR problems. In both Canasta and the US, people who are qualified are unemployed while I can't find qualified candidates.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  13. Re:Oh Really? by unixisc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not just that, the immigrant engineers are leaving for Canada after the Trump administration decides that they want to adapt the same points based/merit based immigration system. If that's such a horrible concept, why are they leaving for a country that has exactly that?

    Also, in the above blurb on Canada, it also states that people have to know either English or French. That's very different from the immigration problem in the US, where people who speak only Spanish come in, w/ no intention of ever learning English

  14. Re:And I thank them by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Farming too hard in the colonies? Trap a bunch of Africans and bring them over as slaves. . . . Now H1Bs. It's all the same thing.

    Yes, when I think about H1Bs coming to the U.S. and getting paid far better than they ever would in their home countries, the immediate parallel that springs to mind is plantations, whips and chains. Ah Maslow, we hardly knew ye.

  15. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    And chewing gum is illegal there.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  16. Re:where are these jobs? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Be prepared to go bankrupt if you get seriously ill.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  17. Re:Oh Really? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    You do know that the US has no official national language, and that Spanish is co-official with English in at least one US state, don't you?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  18. Re:where are these jobs? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, silly me. You'd just come running back to Canada if it came to that.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  19. No single reason by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2

    Let's face it: whatever technology lead the US used to have, it's gone, or about to in the coming years / decades. Just reading tech news regularly yields a # of reasons:

    * Housing prices in the Silicon Valley area.
    * Anti-immigration views displayed by the current US president (and quite a few of his followers).
    * The crazy Republicans vs. Democrats political situation.
    * Intellectual property hassles combined with a lawsuit-happy culture (with expensive lawyers as the cherry on top ;-).
    * Investments in fundamental R&D slipping (vs. other countries gearing up).
    * Silicon Valley itself turning from a brand-new-tech 'heaven' to a create-value-for-shareholders focus.
    * Other countries reaching a stage of development such that there are many tech centres to choose from (see eg. AI talent gathering in China).

    Just to name a few. Not saying the above is good or bad in itself... But if I were about to run a tech startup, rather than Silicon Valley I'd be looking to move to Hong Kong / Shenzhen area. Or even some lesser known place in say, Eastern Europe or South America, provided enough talent in the field & facilities / suppliers were already there.

    Get used to it, US! High tech is spreading around the world. :-)) Your days as top dog are numbered.

    1. Re:No single reason by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Just to name a few. Not saying the above is good or bad in itself... But if I were about to run a tech startup, rather than Silicon Valley I'd be looking to move to Hong Kong / Shenzhen area. Or even some lesser known place in say, Eastern Europe or South America, provided enough talent in the field & facilities / suppliers were already there.

      Well, that's the problem, they're not, which is why the aburdity of SV persists. And, when things do spread, it will likely be to a small number of equally absurd places.

      No employee wants t omove to a jobs black hole, so they go to SV where there are lots of prospect and they can easily switch jobs. This is great for startups: working for a startup is a risk but being able to regain employment in a week if it tanks ameliorates a lot of that risk.

      So employees go where the companies are and the companies go where the employees are. Then (and this is the flaw of sillicon-blah tha tother places like to claim to have) the VC moves in eventually. It's a necessary evil but some companies you can't get off the ground without cold hard cash. SV has a massive investment network.

      Basically the successful places will have all that which means they'll also be cities and because of all the stuff there property will be in high demand and very expensive and salaries will be inflated ot match.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:No single reason by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I've always found the strategy short sighted. If you pick the people right, and by that I mean people with the capability and initiative to do it NOT the people with a stacked resume, then it isn't that hard to train them. If I was to run a startup, I would start somewhere with a good school and find people with those qualities. It's not really that hard to train them while you are working with them. SV startups are just kicking themselves in the ass before they start, paying it all up front; competing for high-priced talent with money that isn't even theirs.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re: No single reason by reanjr · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that you think Silicon Valley is the epicenter of engineering. The US has plenty of room and talent to sustain several tech hubs. Austin, Seattle, San Diego, D.C., etc.

    4. Re:No single reason by molarmass192 · · Score: 2

      You're missing the single most important reason why SV is still "the place" as opposed to every other "tech hub" in the world. It's access to venture capital. Silicon Valley has something on order of 8x more venture capital spend than the next biggest "tech hub". That's not 10% or anything remotely within reach, that's 800% more than number 2. That VC money is the lifeblood of startups, it's what gets you to cashflow positive and allows you to grow your defensive moat against the competition. Until we see a whole lot more growth of VC money, as in multiples, in other markets, SV will remain on top.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  20. Re:Please not creimer! by Richard+Stalin · · Score: 1

    I voted--no joke--for CowboyNeal in the last election. I saw evil any which way I looked at it.

    But what is up with all of this Trump bashing by the editors? Make no mistake: H-1B visas are abused by tech companies to keep salaries down. Persons from overseas are no more capable than citizens to fill positions. When I joined the workforce, there was this thing called "training" that has been since brushed under the rug by the man to keep the common person down.

  21. Re:And I thank them by sexconker · · Score: 1, Troll

    Seriously, this is America's original sin. Farming too hard in the colonies? Trap a bunch of Africans and bring them over as slaves.

    Not quite.
    Africans enslaved and sold other Africans.
    The Portuguese, Spanish, French and English bought those slaves then stuffed them in boats and sent them to work in their colonies (the ones that survived, anyway).

    When the US was founded as an independent nation, slavery became a hot topic not because the north thought it was bad and the south was racist, but because the governing structure of the country involved indirect representation of people, and slaves were people. Well, three fifths of a person each, after haggling with the north who thought they should be zero fifths of a person.

    The 3/5s compromise was fine enough until the south saw their economic and legal power was being stripped away as population and industry in the north grew and as the north kept adding states. Westward expansion saw continual fights over whether new territory / states should have slavery or not. The industrial revolution wasn't exactly kind to plantations.

    The north wanted to abolish slavery and send slaves back to Africa, or at least to end the slave trade and grant protection and state citizenship to any slaves who made it north to a free state. The south, of course, wanted to keep their slaves, have them count for representation, keep the slave trade and keep expanding westward with new slave states.

    Eventually, we had a civil war over the issue. The north (union) won - barely. But let's not pretend they were fighting for noble reasons. The fight over slavery was about money and power for most people of the time, not what was morally right. Even Lincoln didn't start with the Emancipation Proclamation. He was fine keeping the status quo. So much so that we engaged in the bloodiest war in US history (true to this day) when another option was available - just let the south secede.

    I find it odd that people love to point to the US as being the poster boy for racism, slavery, etc. The US was not alone in that shit, and in fact inherited that shit from their British masters.

  22. leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 2

    And in other news, California is experiencing an exodus. And it's mostly the middle class that's fleeing progressive California.

    1. Re:leaving California too by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Not really, foreign immigration makes up for the Americans that can't cut it in CA and leave for red states :D

    2. Re:leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not really, foreign immigration makes up for the Americans that can't cut it in CA and leave for red states :D

      With one of the highest rates of income inequality and poverty in the nation, it looks like California is becoming a state of ultra-wealthy tech overlords and their foreign slave labor. Yeah, anybody with a choice doesn't want to be part of such a dysfunctional social structure. And the irony is that these people still blame conservatives for the massive inequality, racism, and poverty in California.

    3. Re:leaving California too by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Good! CA is too crowded, traffic sucks bigly here.

    4. Re:leaving California too by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Right, they're leaving because of progressive policies. Absurdly gigantic housing cost and traffic nightmares (=lots of time wasted) can't possibly have anything to do with it.

    5. Re:leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Right, they're leaving because of progressive policies. Absurdly gigantic housing cost and traffic nightmares (=lots of time wasted) can't possibly have anything to do with it.

      The latter are consequences of the former.

    6. Re:leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      What won't be so good is that for percentage point that the middle class population drops, taxes or deficits will go up several percentage points. And if you own a home, improvements in traffic go along with substantial drops in the value of your home.

    7. Re:leaving California too by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If you make an average income in CA, you pay average to low taxes since property taxes are low. Drive an older car or motorbike, live in a 1 or 2 bedroom condo in a working-class part of SD county... all of the benefits, none of the costs. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

    8. Re:leaving California too by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      Housing costs are due to restrictive zoning, and traffic nightmares are due to high city population.

      Neither is a result of either liberal or conservative politics (there is strict zoning everywhere in the US).

    9. Re:leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Neither is a result of either liberal or conservative politics (there is strict zoning everywhere in the US).

      Bullshit. Restrictive zoning is a progressive favorite, as are rent control, environmental protection, housing subsidies, public transit subsidies, high taxes, low cost housing initiatives, and many other policies that massive increase the cost of housing and restrict the availability of housing. Similarly for traffic.

      Policy matters, and Democrats and progressives support specific bad policies with specific bad outcomes.

    10. Re:leaving California too by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      Um, no. All demographics support zoning. Liberals say wishy washy things about preserving the fabric of their communities. Conservatives talk about protecting their real estate investments and keeping out crime. Both talk about maintaining good schools. In the end they all support zoning about equally. Cities in Texas have just as much zoning as cities in California.

      The other factors you mentioned have a minimal effect on housing prices. Most of them only affect a small part of the housing market (i.e. rent control). The remainder have negligible affect on housing prices, except for high taxes which might increase prices by 10-20%. Put together they don't come close to explaining why housing prices are hundreds of percent higher in the biggest cities. Only zoning explains that.

    11. Re:leaving California too by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Um, no. All demographics support zoning

      I support zoning. I don't support California's idiotic, progressive, self-serving zoning. But zoning is only a small part of California's housing crisis and fiscal problems.

      The other factors you mentioned have a minimal effect on housing prices.

      Apparently you believe that restating bullshit somehow makes it true.

      But thank you for illustrating the kind of widespread economic illiteracy and stupidity that drives California's dysfunction.

    12. Re:leaving California too by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I suspect big families are leaving but those with few or no kids will replace them.

  23. Re:where are these jobs? by dk20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Canadian who lived in the US for ~4 years before returning to canada.. Running back for health care would be hard. after 183 days outside the country they cancel it on you.

    "All provinces, except Ontario and Newfoundland, require you to actually live in your home province for at least six months plus a day (183 days in most years) in order to be considered a permanent resident of that province, and therefore qualified for provincial health insurance (medicare) benefits. That means actually residing in your home province and being able to prove it, if necessary, not simply owning a residence there and living in Portugal, Mexico or California for eight or nine months."

  24. Re:They're probably all Democrats by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Shanghai Bill above mentioned Singapore, and if one knows Spanish, Chile is good as well

  25. Not news by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    We knew that engineers would leave. The question is whether the jobs are leaving with them. I don't think I see that trend.

  26. Re:Oh Really? by mikael · · Score: 1

    Read the Vancouver property market situation. Some people have been buying visas from Montreal, moving to Vancouver and speculating on apartment and home prices. At the same time, salaries have been falling.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  27. Re:Oh Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can only have a functional society when everyone is able to communicate. Democracy only works when people can debate and ideas can compete. Asking that those that want to live here speak the language is not being mean or divisive. It's asking that they integrate with society and become part of it. It's actually inclusive in that it wants those people to be integral.

    As for the part about the immigration rules.... Well, when a country that is currently led by a Progressive says it, it must be good. When Trump says the same thing, it must be bad. People have their heads so far up their rears, they don't look at the idea, they look at the messenger. Those that say they're educated and smart, are nothing more than sheep who don't pay attention to the actual issues.

  28. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    Maybe slightly lower income tax, but wait until they see what ordinance violations exist, and what the payments are, as well as how often they are cited. Also, no guns.

    "Singapore has one of the toughest gun control laws in the world. According to the Arms Offences Act, unlawful possession or carrying of firearms is punishable with imprisonment and caning. Using or attempting to use arms when committing a scheduled offense is punishable with death. The death penalty may also apply to the offender’s accomplices present at the scene of the offense."

  29. If you know it's comming by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    why doesn't your company invest in training? Maybe lobby for more vocational schools and better funding for public universities. Most of what I'm seeing from companies is lobbying for lower taxes which in turn means fewer educational services. If you want good workers, pay for them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:If you know it's comming by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Maybe lobby for more vocational schools and better funding for public universities

      What makes you think they aren't? We have been doing that for the best part of the past 5 years, but this kind of approach takes a long time to achieve a result.

      Are you willing to have a vacancy for 10 years while you're busy fixing the world?

  30. Re:Please not creimer! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I started making a playlist of it that repeats it several times, but I'm having trouble being in the same room while it is playing.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  31. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Singapore has one of the best housing program in the world. Citizens pay a fair amount to buy an apartment from the government, and they are well build and good size. Rich peoples, pay dearly to buy house/apartment from private builder. Those are bigger, in the best area, and extras.

    US government is really shitty, but I am not sure if it is this way by choice or by chance. The same go for many western countries' government, including shitty Canada (I was a Canadian citizen).

  32. Merit-based Immigration by kenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In 1967, Canada became the first country to adopt a points-based immigration system.

    So fifty years after Canada implements a merit-based (AKA points-based) immigration policy America-hating Americans attack President Trump and his administration as being anti-immigrant by proposing a similar immigration program. (Apparently the only good immigration program is one that increases the absolute number of immigrants admitted into the country annually...)

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Merit-based Immigration by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Australia and NZ also have similar systems, but progressives in the US claim that it's racist for Trump wanting to have it as you pointed out. But they'll laud the immigration system in all three countries as great. Considering the absolute shitshow going on up here in Canada right now? There's a lot of angry people, and you're hearing a lot of "maybe Japans immigration system is better."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Merit-based Immigration by Shados · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian myself (living in the US), and while I think Trump is absolutely batshit crazy in general, I can't help also feel the current immigration situation is also crazy. To be fair, I'm not particularly informed on the matter, it's just an initial impression.

      Is there another 1st world country with such open immigration policies (not whats written in the books, but how it works in practice) that isn't getting any significant backlash from its population?

      I moved to the US because it was much harder to get my significant other (American citizen) to move from the US to Canada. Recently that was the whole deal about someone in France being denied for not shaking hand. If I remember well Germany had a fairly open one but got a lot of flack for it a while back. Japan is LOLNOPE. What country is the US less open than?

    3. Re: Merit-based Immigration by kenh · · Score: 1

      On any given day there are 1 million legal immigrants in the US, and as quickly as they either leave or attain permanent legal status new immigrants arrive behind them to take their place.

      What other country has 1 million legal immigrants, let alone our 30-40 million illegal immigrants?

      --
      Ken
    4. Re: Merit-based Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What other country has 1 million legal immigrants, let alone our 30-40 million illegal immigrants?

      Your figure is exaggerated by a factor of about 3.

  33. Re:where are these jobs? by kenh · · Score: 1

    Be prepared to go bankrupt if you get seriously ill.

    As a well-paid senior (20 yrs experience) software engineer he likely has health insurance coverage from his employer, and as such will likely NOT go broke if he gets "seriously ill,"

    --
    Ken
  34. Re:Oh Really? by mejustme · · Score: 2

    In both Canasta and the US, people who are qualified are unemployed while I can't find qualified candidates.

    If only corporations were more open to remote workers versus insisting that people be sitting in the head office between 9am-5pm. That is the main problem I'm currently facing, trying to find work in my relatively small city. Lots of work...as long as I'm willing to move to one of the large cities where the cost-of-living is so high I cannot afford a decent house, much less a nice place to raise my children.

  35. Canada implements H1-B Visas by kenh · · Score: 1

    Last year, in consultation with trade groups, it created a program called the Global Skills Strategy to issue temporary work permits to people with job offers in certain categories, including senior software engineers, in as little as two weeks. Since the program started in June, more than 5,600 people have been granted permits, from the U.S., India, Pakistan, Brazil, and elsewhere.

    So Canada has implemented their own version of the H1-B Visa program and took in 5,600 highly-skilled professionals and gave them temporary work permits... Big Deal.

    --
    Ken
  36. You do know that by nuckfuts · · Score: 1, Informative

    Canada is in America, right?

  37. Re:Oh Really? by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Big fucking deal. Drive around south side Buffalo, NY, and you'd think you were in County Clare, Ireland. What about Little Italy in NYC? No one complains about those "hostile invasions."

  38. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    At least there's that.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  39. Re:Oh Really? by Tool+Man · · Score: 1

    Remote-friendly places do exist, TELUS is one decent-sized example. It's a hell of a lot easier if it's part of the company culture.

  40. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have you been paying attention to the politics out of Toronto(Ontario) and federally by the Liberal Party the last few years? The anti-white racism being pushed by both parties, is part and parcel the same being pushed by progressives in the US. Look at it this way, the policies of the Ontario Liberal Party and their actions have likely just killed their party. The Progressive Conservatives have moved into a likely super-majority status in the legislature with an estimated 85-98 seats. The NDP manage to hold on and maintain party status with 8 or more seats and gain official opposition status. The liberals hold 7 or less seats. 8 are required to be considered an official party and receive any government funding.

    What's being played out is no different the the collapse of the Progressive Conservatives federally in the early 90's.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  41. Re: Oh Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The whole USA was a hostile invasion to begin with.

  42. Re:Oh Really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Canada has a more attractive system because there is a better path to citizenship and family reunion.

    Some people (not just in the US, in the UK too) seem to think that they can just get people in for a few years and then send them home. Good people won't come on those terms.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  43. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where would they go, the US is the most right wing capitalist country in the world even with the Dems in control.

    If you are on the libertarian part of the spectrum you could go somewhere with less government.
    There are a couple of places in the world where the government have no control over the population and the land is ruled by communities formed by people.
    It would be the right wing dream if it weren't for those places being in Africa and those people having to form their own militias and fight against other communities and live their lives as a part of a military unit, plundering everything and killing civilians just to survive themselves.
    You know, the way everyone else knows will happen if libertarians got their way.

  44. Re:Oh Really? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I was in Southern California. Trust me. That area has an official language. And it's Spanish.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  45. Re:Oh Really? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If the money is good enough, I'll come. But that's the other problem, the main reason these countries want to import foreign labour is that they want to import cheap labour...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Re:Oh Really? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > When I asked him about it he said that he was having too much trouble finding work in Canada lately.

    Well I can't speak for "that guy", but unemployment in Canada is on its historical low:

    http://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/canadas-unemployment-rate-declines-to-lowest-in-four-decades

    Note that we count our rate differently than in the US, and there's about a 1% difference if we count using the US methods. So this corresponds to something around 4.7% compared to the current US rate of 4.1%

    Wait, you don't work for Ford do you?

  47. Re:Oh Really? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 2

    > they chose a country that is more difficult to enter legally than the US

    Canada has a population of 30 million and brings in 300,000 a year, so that's 1%

    The US has a population of 325 million and brings in 1.5 million a year, so that's 0.5%

    So Canada is twice as easy to get into, legally.

  48. Re:where are these jobs? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Happens everywhere, thanks for the story. Here's another story.. Wife had cancer twice; both treated successfully and we get to have a life after.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  49. Re: And I thank them by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    Not that long, the UK's Slavery Abolition Act was in 1833, which supersedes the 1807 law. France was 1976 IIRC. So around 50 to 60 years, which isn't that long in the grand scheme of things.

  50. Re:Oh Really? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    If you can do the job from home, so can a better qualified worker in India getting 1/10 the pay.

  51. Re:where are these jobs? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    health insurance with no lifetime cap? Does that exist?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  52. Re:The real reason the engineers are leaving by lamer01 · · Score: 2

    correction: They want the best cheap engineers

  53. Re:They're probably all Democrats by bobby · · Score: 1

    ...they even spank petty criminals.

    At first glance I thought you typed "spank pretty criminals".

  54. Re:They're probably all Democrats by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    I know someone in Africa who worked until he could afford a juice cart. Finally he started to make a living for his family. That lasted a few months and warlords came and shot up his town. Possessions were taken, along with his juice cart. This is the world libertarians will have us in. Giving absolute power to people with no legal structure for which to obtain that power in is an absolute disaster every time. Worse than capitalism.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  55. Re:They're probably all Democrats by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Oops.. meant 'worse than communism'.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  56. Re:Oh Really? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    I've worked with good people in India, but large companies aren't getting those people at 1/10 the pay. Those people in my experience are really just capable of following direct orders so they need someone to direct things. I've been told it's because people with 'skills' quickly want to become part of management because of social status but I don't know how true this is.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  57. The Real Reason by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    Engineers are the only talent the USA has to trade for decent NHL players.

    The incentive is better beer for the engineers and sex without snow shoes for the hockey stars.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  58. mens rea / intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Australia and NZ also have similar systems, but progressives in the US claim that it's racist for Trump wanting to have it as you pointed out.

    Because why you do something is often as important as what you want: it's called intent. And it's the difference between (e.g.) murder and manslaughter. Or, to a lesser degree: accidentally elbowing someone in the face from wildly gesticulating while telling a story, and walking over to someone and popping them one.

    "I want immigrants with a different set of skills" and "I want to keep the brown people out" are both reasons to change and an immigration: can you tell the difference between the two?

    1. Re:mens rea / intent by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      "I want immigrants with a different set of skills" and "I want to keep the brown people out" are both reasons to change and an immigration: can you tell the difference between the two?

      Apparently you can't with your own post, by all means explain your bigotry.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  59. Re:Please not creimer! by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    The 2 party system we have is an artifact of a first past the post election system. The only way a different party is ever going to be more than a spoiler in national elections is to start at the state level and build up a party that takes over for one of the existing parties. Until then a vote for a 3rd party candidate for President is just a wasted vote. You'd be better off voting against the major party candidate you'd least like to see in the office.

  60. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know what'd be awesome? If you learned the difference between libertarianism and anarchy. What you just described was anarchy.

  61. Re:Oh Really? by dk20 · · Score: 1

    I remeber when i lived in the US there was a big sign by the highway "Day labor pickup".. Not some cardboard sign, but an actual metal sign like the government pots, complete with a nice waiting area for all the illigial workers..

  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. Recent history of merit-based immigration by Guppy · · Score: 1

    The idea of Merit-based immigration has a rather interesting history here in the US:
    https://www.theatlantic.com/bu...

    tl;dr is that in the early 1960's, civil-rights proponents (from the progressive faction of the Democratic party) were once the champions of a merit-based immigration system. Opponents (mostly the southern Democratic party faction) championed the blood-tie / family-reuinification system, assuming that since the USA demography was at that time overwhelmingly white and of Western and Northern European descent, a blood-tie based system would serve to preserve the status quo. What they did not anticipate was the collapse in Western/Northern European emigration, as their birth-rates fell and their economies improved.

    Not really covered in the article above, is that afterwards the Southern Democrats would flip to the Republican party during the "Southern Strategy" shift, resulting in a scrambling of ideological alignments of both the Democrats and the Republicans that contributed to the modern day mess.

  64. Re:They're probably all Democrats by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    No, what I just described is a society with a complete lack of government regulation.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  65. Re: Oh Really? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    You missed the part where Canada doesn't limit the country but you have Trump pushing laws to exclude certain countries, not even all the real bad ones. That's the xenophobic part you missed. (I believe there's also limits per country/region in US immigration as well).

  66. Re: Oh Really? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck are you asking the Internet why two Americans work for you? We're not fucking mind readers and you didn't imply anything obvious. Your post is meaningless unless you can tell us why.

  67. Re: Then they realize it's sometimes -20c by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    Two words, "Lower Mainland".

  68. Re:Please not creimer! by xx_chris · · Score: 1

    If you can't understand all the Trump bashing then you are likely a Russian troll.

  69. Doesn't matter by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Once the merging of Canada and the United States is complete, who cares? Instead of 50 it'll be 65 states. When California breaks up, it'll be 69.

  70. Re:They're probably all Democrats by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Where would they go, the US is the most right wing capitalist country in the world

    Singapore is a low-tax authoritarian country which spends little on social programs, spends robustly on their military, executes drug dealers, and they even spank petty criminals.

    They also tax alcohol and tobacco heavily, chewing gum is banned and prostitution is legal... Not really paradise for the ultra-right wing religious redneck.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  71. Be careful though... by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    Diploma of immigrants are not recognized by Canada. It's silly because immigrant application scores are boosted because they have bac/master/phd/whatever but once in the country, they have to go back to universities!

    It's not uncommon in Canada to see doctors (yes, MD) or various degree engineers, driving taxi.

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Be careful though... by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      > Diploma of immigrants are not recognized by Canada

      True... they are only interested in your "Eh" Levels.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  72. Re:They're probably all Democrats by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

    You say that as though libertarianism were a stable form of government.

  73. Re: Oh Really? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    I'm in Canada. A few years ago, I was looking for good QA testers. We were paying low 40k's a year for local people with college degrees. I get a call from one of these job placement type companies in the area. He's going on about how much cheaper to have a team in India to help productivity and what not. They had 4 weeks vacation and 10 days of paid training a year factored in (we start with two weeks vacation). I started off thinking I was going to get people for 12k-25k per year per person. The cost per person was $60k a year. I never talked to the company again.

  74. Re:They're probably all Democrats by mikael · · Score: 1

    But those that can't afford to live in Singapore have to commute from Malaysia via the Johor-Singapore causeway. No different from the various bridges that connect San Francisco to Marin county or Oakland.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads