Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Has a Top-Secret Plan to Build Home Robots (bloomberg.com)

After making smart speakers a household product (at least to some), Amazon seems to have found its next big consumer product: robots. Amazon is building smart robots that are equipped with cameras that let them drive around homes, Bloomberg reported Monday. These robots could launch as soon as next year. From the report: Codenamed "Vesta," after the Roman goddess of the hearth, home and family, the project is overseen by Gregg Zehr, who runs Amazon's Lab126 hardware research and development division based in Sunnyvale, California. Lab126 is responsible for Amazon devices such as the Echo speakers, Fire TV set-top-boxes, Fire tablets and the ill-fated Fire Phone.

The Vesta project originated a few years ago, but this year Amazon began to aggressively ramp up hiring. There are dozens of listings on the Lab 126 Jobs page for openings like "Software Engineer, Robotics" and "Principle Sensors Engineer." People briefed on the plan say the company hopes to begin seeding the robots in employees' homes by the end of this year, and potentially with consumers as early as 2019, though the timeline could change, and Amazon hardware projects are sometimes killed during gestation.

91 comments

  1. And only Will Smith can stop them! by Kenja · · Score: 2

    I assume.... and perhaps it's the Will Smith from tested.com

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re: And only Will Smith can stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a very bad bug eating you. Fight it off!

    2. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Will Smith gave in. The last sentence of his autobiography reads, "I now love Big Brother and robots; they are one in the same."

    3. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      If it is just a "camera and speaker with wheels", with no ability to navigate stairs or open doors, then that has been done before, and is not very useful. If it can do more, there is no mention of that in the video to TFA.

    4. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by vtcodger · · Score: 2

      Yep. If I had a TOP SECRET plan, the first thing I'd do is tell Bloomberg News about it.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If it is just a "camera and speaker with wheels", with no ability to navigate stairs or open doors, then that has been done before, and is not very useful. If it can do more, there is no mention of that in the video to TFA.

      "Been done before" doesn't mean it won't be successful with Amazon's vast marketing department and public good-will.

      Smart phones had been done before the iPhone. Smart watches had been done before the pebble. Electric vehicles had been done before Tesla. That didn't stop those companies launching successful products.

      As for "not very useful", no, probably not, but "cutesy and cool" will gather market share- it will be a self navigating Alexa most likely. I'm sure sell a few hundred thousand of them and it will bring in enough money for R&D to add some useful features. The data and feedback they get from customers will suggest ideas that they might be able to legitimately tackle.

      I agree with you that it's been done before, and probably not very useful, but I wouldn't put it beyond Amazon, making a successful product from this anyway.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by gnick · · Score: 1

      no ability to navigate stairs or open doors, then that has been done before

      Daleks don't need stairs; they level the building.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous and "not authorized to comment" sources have created an environment where you can just make shit up and publish it to the masses.

      Our media sources have all become the National Enquirer. The headlines are always explosive but the underlying content never comes close to supporting the headline.

    8. Re:And only Will Smith can stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart watches had been done before the pebble.

      The What???

    9. Re: And only Will Smith can stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A home robot is the next logical step from their home voice assistant. I predicted this months ago.

  2. Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we're just tossing in the towel on having decent titles, eh?

    "Totally secret thing sitting right here for all to read..."

    1. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the title isn't slashdot's fault, they literally copy pasted it from bloomberg
      being too lazy to write their own title is slashdot's fault

    2. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch THE VIDEO that got a 20+ year Slashdotter BANNED from Slashdot!

    3. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone post the creimer pasta

    4. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the little shitstain that tosses salads every Wednesday and Friday at the gay bar off 1 Infinite Drive.

    5. Re:Click bait by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Does it involve mycleanpc.com?

    6. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read THE COMMENTS that show creimer was nothing more than a mentally deficient under-diagnosed, under-medicated idiotic pest that managed to attract no supporters and no sympathy from anyone in 20+ years.

      As he eats alone again in his cramped rented loft with thin walls tonight.

    7. Re:Click bait by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      listened, for a little bit, to your rant about /. i cannot help but wonder why buy /.? why not just start your own version of /.? and make it the way you would like to see /.?

    8. Re: Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He thinks if he buys slashdot then all the nerds will respect him.

      Doubt it tho, dudes a troll, a loser, and a fat slob.

    9. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer, I reported you to youtube so all these spam posts will do is bring your view count in negative territory for a given day since youtube barred your stupid click-bot and your spam posts. minus 89 views for today!


      MODDOWN! ; creimer youtube spam post again!

      creimer wants you to click on his youtube channel, then click on his stupid amazon affiliate link spam on Youtube. There is nothing of value on creimer youtube channel. Only creimer click-bot goes there.

    10. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit man!

      I told the fat fucker that youtube was much smarter than slashdot in dealing with spammers that bring no value but as usual, the bastard doesn't listen to anybody but himself!

      Oh well, I believe creimer youtube adventure is coming to an end soon...

    11. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! This!

      Google is big brother so they already know everything about creimer, what he eats, what porn he watches, etc.

      It is unbelievable that the inflated head creimer figures that he is going to fool them.

      The only thing that helps creimer and he knows it and takes advatage of it, is that creimer is a retard handled by the Special Education for the Santa Clara County office of Education. So, creimer is a headache for the lawyers of those organizations.

      But creimer will never manage to fool them, they are sneaky bastards too. Creimer doesn't stand a chance with his 8 year old brain abilities.

    12. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly,

      But it seems like Chris is a victim here. He keeps on reading those SEO, youtube algorithm, basically get rich quick sites. He doesn't realize that he is the fish for them since they make money off him with their own schemes. Then, he wastes his time trying to implement what those sites suggest and he ends up disturbing people.

      I mean, those crooks tell Chris that he has to build personal brands and he goes on the Internet and makes everything about himself public!

      I believe we should bring this up at our next meeting. He might not be our only patient victim of such on-line abuse.

      --
      Silvia Bunge
      Psychology Department
      University of California, Berkeley

    13. Re:Click bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The video came out on April 1st. Creimer did a hell of a lot more than the Slashdot editors did on April Fool's Day. All we got was one lousy story summarizing April Fool's Day around the Internet. If you been around Slashdot for 20 years, the video was brilliant.

  3. APK is a sad, bitter little man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He needs to stop the personal attacks against ShanghaiBill and Zontar The Mindless. It's even more pathetic when he subsequently denies making the personal attacks. APK has a uniquely annoying writing style, and it's obviously him behind the attack posts.

    1. Re: APK is a sad, bitter little man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is he so butthurt? Is it because nobody ever downloads his crummy, bug-ridden software?

  4. Huh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not so "top-secret" if I can read about it on slashdot

    1. Re:Huh.. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      not so "top-secret" if I can read about it on slashdot

      That makes you an insider! Aren't you excited??

    2. Re:Huh.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      not so "top-secret" if I can read about it on slashdot

      That makes you an insider! Aren't you excited??

      I feel like 1 in a million

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  5. Alexa sexbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Prime membership unlocks multiple new positions!

  6. Oh that's great! by DaMattster · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is no way in the shady side of hell that I would ever let an Amazon robot inside my home. Given the IoT security problems and the like, I couldn't trust it not to get hacked by voyeur or have it collect data from some of the most intimate parts of my life. Amazon can go suck some huge green balls!

    1. Re:Oh that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yawn. Another Slashdot article about Amazon, another "no way not me!" post. Amazon doesn't care about you. For every you, there are 10,000 people who will happily have Amazon robots in their houses. You are irrelevant.

    2. Re:Oh that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way in the shady side of hell that I would ever let an Amazon robot inside my home.

      I would consider buying one if it wasn't connected to the internet. That's about the only way though.

      On the flip-side, I'm guessing there's no way Amazon would sell one of these without it being connected to the internet.

    3. Re:Oh that's great! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The problem is, once x% of the population does something, it's easier for governments to push laws that requires you to do it, too.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Oh that's great! by PeopleAquarium · · Score: 2

      It would be too computationally expensive to house the 'brains' inside the robot. Far cheaper to stream it's interactions to the cloud. Most people will gladly trade their privacy for a robot that can wash the dishes, or do the laundry though. People trade it now just to play Farmville.

    5. Re:Oh that's great! by RobinH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's already "hacked" by a voyeur: Amazon! There was an article last year about the Roomba (or Neato?) CEO saying he wanted to collect information about the inside of your home and sell it. This Amazon stuff (Alexa, robot) is exactly for this purpose. Forget that.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    6. Re:Oh that's great! by jetkust · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, in 10 years, he'll be posting on Slashdot through his Amazon robot.

    7. Re:Oh that's great! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Amazon can go suck some huge green balls!

      Careful what you ask for; they're working on a pleasure bot.

    8. Re:Oh that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think it's less expensive to house the brains for an army of these robots in some giant datafarm than in people's homes? The network connections to these datafarms add a huge latency, and if the CPU needs are non-trivial, it is just not practical to offload the load to the server farm.

      AWS works because it allows small numbers of people to burst use thousands of CPUs for a short period of time. If instead you have huge numbers of people using relatively few CPUs each, it's cheaper to have the CPUs locally. And this idiotic push for cloud apps focuses on apps that leave your CPU idle 99.99% of the time like MS Word. If you really need CPU power, you can't load it in the cloud.

      And how much CPU do you think it takes to run an autonomous robot? If you think $300 for a mid-range Intel CPU is too much, you can't afford a house robot and never will be able to.

      And do you think self-drive cars will offload CPU load to the cloud?

    9. Re:Oh that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having the brains be in a base station that also acts as a charging dock (and possibly has it's own WiFi access point) would make a lot more sense than trying to put the on the robot or in the cloud.

      The base station would then just stream the data that Amazon wants rather than having to send everything, and the end user pays for the hardware to do the processing.

    10. Re:Oh that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like Alexa works well on the cloud, since : I don't think it uses too much CPU. It can be useful to run on server with 256GB or 1TB RAM etc. where a ****ton of voice and language related data sits there in RAM? The voice and language data is continuously updated. High latency works : it can take 200ms or 300ms or more.
      For a robot you'd better have it stop quick if you want it to not run over your toddler, break things, set things on fire. If it's very CPU intensive you want as much load to reside on the customer's premise : just like websites don't care if they run CPU-heavy javascript on your browser and hardware. The megawatts in data centers aren't cheap.

      A rough analogue to the robot's 'brains' would be the Microsoft Kinect : it was built with large scale data machine learning - before machine learning was a hype word. It's rather powerful and CPU hungry, even the first version on Xbox 360. With the current silicon processes, dedicated hardware it doesn't have to be super power hungry - several teraflops worth of processing are doable for 10 watts or more.
      There would be software and data updates.
      Alexa speakers have to be much cheaper than that ; things like google voice recognition have to run on low end smartphones, or even old netbooks running arbitrary OS and software.
      The robot can have much better and vertically integrated hardware and software. Mass-market consumer products like Microsoft Kinect 2.0 plus Xbox One, Nintendo Switch, iPhone X are examples of powerful stuff (the Nintendo Switch isn't much "AI" related, but I throw it in there as it is "outdated" and would be able to run Crysis)

    11. Re:Oh that's great! by PeopleAquarium · · Score: 1

      So you think it's less expensive to house the brains for an army of these robots in some giant datafarm than in people's homes?

      Yes, because it is. Shared resources make things like machine learning, speech recognition, and image recognition much cheaper at scale. There are a ton of products doing it this way already. Additionally, the average person can't afford and does not want, a rack full of servers in their home, and even if they did... they couldn't afford it. However, by sharing that rack full of servers with other users many more people can effectively share the same hardware and bring prices down to a reasonable level.

      The network connections to these datafarms add a huge latency, and if the CPU needs are non-trivial, it is just not practical to offload the load to the server farm.

      The latency is not a big deal. We're talking a few hundred milliseconds, or less, if you've got a proper CDN and a decent pipe. I stream games through my Nvidia Shield all the time and seldom notice any delay between the button being pressed and the screen updating. Or when I speak to Alexa, Ok Google, or Siri. That tiny delay is certainly better than human reaction time, and certainly less time then it would take for a single weak local CPU to perform the task that just occupied dozens of cores with TB's of memory in the cloud for a fraction of a millisecond.

      AWS works because it allows small numbers of people to burst use thousands of CPUs for a short period of time. If instead you have huge numbers of people using relatively few CPUs each, it's cheaper to have the CPUs locally. And this idiotic push for cloud apps focuses on apps that leave your CPU idle 99.99% of the time like MS Word. If you really need CPU power, you can't load it in the cloud.

      This just isn't true. It's more cost effective to host resource-intensive tasks in data centers and stream the results in most or many cases. That's why Google, Amazon, Apple, Nvidia, and a ton of other people are both offering the services and using them in their own products.

      And do you think self-drive cars will offload CPU load to the cloud?

      Yes. Eventually, the car will have a local CPU as failback, and will operate with reduced functionality when a connection is unavailable or unsuitable.

    12. Re:Oh that's great! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Brains?

      Think of the Zombies!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re:Oh that's great! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Eventually, the car will have a local CPU as failback, and will operate with reduced functionality when a connection is unavailable or unsuitable.

      Like when it is out of the showroom?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    14. Re:Oh that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think it's less expensive to house the brains for an army of these robots in some giant datafarm than in people's homes?

      You don't have an Echo, do you?

  7. This plan is so top secret...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..... That we're discussing it on Slashdot.

  8. Alexa? by bobstreo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "No matter what I said before, please tell the robot to stop killing Jehova's Witnesses when they come to the door."

    1. Re:Alexa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do it before?

    2. Re:Alexa? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No no, you don't snuff them, you refer them to the Mormons.

  9. Poor OPSEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow TOP SECRET, seems they did a poor job of OPSEC if we now all know. ;-)

  10. Where's Rosie, the robotic maid? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I sort of expect that nobody who is alive today will see it be a reality, however.

    1. Re:Where's Rosie, the robotic maid? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      A Roomba doesn't have enough sass to truly replace Rosey the Robot.

      Notably in the Jetsons people didn't normally buy household robots, they rented them. Perhaps that's a business model still worth exploring.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Where's Rosie, the robotic maid? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Notably in the Jetsons people didn't normally buy household robots, they rented them.

      You mean like robot365?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Where's Rosie, the robotic maid? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The sass is a cool nice to have, but honestly, I'd settle entirely for just being able to actually automate the butler/maid functionality properly.

      A roomba can vacuum a level floor, but can't move furniture to vacuum underneath it, nor vacuum the sofa or bed to clear them of cat hair.

      A roomba will also not put dishes in the dishwasher and put them away when they are clean, it will not do your laundry for you and neatly fold all laundry and put them in their appropriate place when clean.

      Not to mention that a roomba can't do any of the other housework that isn't vacuuming, like organizing and putting things away, laundry and dishes, et al.

      I know that such a machine would not be cheap, but I doubt it will ever even exist in my lifetime... perhaps my grandkids will have children that might have such things though.

  11. Is Bezos a prisoner? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Is he trying to send us a secret message about the amazon clouds evil plans?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Is Bezos a prisoner? by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, his responses are limited. You must ask the right questions.

  12. "Principal" not "Principle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Amazon's job site has it right. The article author has it wrong. A principal is a chief or head, particularly of a school. Principal can also be used as an adjective meaning “first or highest in rank, importance, or value,” as in The principal objective of this article is to teach you the difference between two words. A principle, on the other hand, is “rule of action or conduct” or “a fundamental doctrine or tenet.” http://www.dictionary.com/e/pr...

    1. Re:"Principal" not "Principle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 informative for your post, AC.

      Also, minus one million for msmash. Learn english, dumbass.

  13. The title needs changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title needs changed, this is not a top-secret project, even slashdot knows about it.

    1. Re:The title needs changed by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1

      Amazon marketing announces new project formerly code named Vesta

      There, is that about right?

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  14. I guess it's not top secret any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all

  15. Spammatic [Re:Oh that's great!] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    A roaming bot with a camera could be a big source of sales and related spam. The bot could tell what's worn out or missing from your home, and forward suggestions of replacement products of a matching size and style preference to Alexa, your email inbox, and/or web ads. It could become the ultimate targeted spam engine: Truman Show for the masses.

  16. AWESOME I can now get spied wherever I go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always dreamed of the day when I would get spied by a device that is always in my pocket, a TV I watch after work, a listening hub that listens to everything that happens at home, a computer I use for entertainment and a device that would follow me everywhere around the house. Can't wait!!!!!!!!!!!!

  17. I can't wait for it to respond to a request with.. by 8127972 · · Score: 2

    .... "I'm sorry Jeff, I'm afraid I can't do that."

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  18. Skynet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon has been compromised by or is on it's way to becoming Skynet.

  19. all part of their grand plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To take over the world.
    - Dominate retail - tick
    - Dominate cloud computing - half a tick
    - Dominate homes - half a tick.

    No Amazon **** is coming into my home.

  20. I don't think we should use Amazon by ruddk · · Score: 0

    until they stop treating their workers like shit.

  21. If people are comfortable with the idea by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1, Informative

    of having trojan horses inside their homes, why not.

    1. Re:If people are comfortable with the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people interested in this don't know that phrase.

  22. Three words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mobile Surveillance Platform".

    As if it wasn't bad enough their damned 'smart speaker' listens in on everything in your house, now this goddamned thing will follow you around and watch and listen to everything you're doing, and send it all back to Amazon (or the NSA, or the FBI, or some creep hacking into the system).

    Some years ago here on Slashdot I used to poke the anti-privacy idiots with a stick by telling them "how'd you like cameras and microphones in every room of your hosue, watching and listening to everything you say and do?" They'd say "Oh, well, that'll never happen, you're just a tinfoil-hat-wearing paranoid, and besides which I'm not doing anything wrong so I have nothing to fear, LOL." Well guess what you fucking idiots, the future is NOW. You're a fool if you ever bought one of these, just like you're a fool for having an always-on 'smart speaker' in your house. You all enjoying being like bugs under a microscope? Animals in a zoo? Convicts in prison? This is your life now, and you paid for the privilege. Idiots.

  23. Really? No kidding? by Ulfilas2000 · · Score: 1

    Take an Alexa, stick some wheels on it and a motor and voila, home robot. Who's surprised?

  24. Corporate commerce based robot roaming my home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, no.

  25. Loyalty by sdinfoserv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The main difference between an Amazon, Google or FB robot or any smart assistant is loyalty. All the shows and cartoons we grew up that had robots - we still wish for - have their loyalty to us, the owners. They assist us, perform tasks for us, and protect us, till their own demise if necessary.
    Today's "robots" won't be "owned" by us. You will will "lease the right to use them for X period of time". Make no mistake, these self moving spy devices will maintain their allegiance to the corporate overlord for the sole purpose of injecting themselves into your most personal thoughts and decisions, in the very fabric of your personal life so they can continually monitor, digest, live stream and sell to the highest bidder. oh, and share with any acronym agency when the secret court demands.
    Even if they "agree" not sell your data directly - it will be completely scrap able via api's.

    1. Re:Loyalty by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      One idea is that the device will be continuously transmitting data to its owner. Another bother is when one lives at the beach, rust and termites are always present.

    2. Re:Loyalty by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      If termites are such a problem, I will have a lot of trouble hacking it with my sonic screwdriver.

  26. Rosie! Get me a fire extinguisher! by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Rosie, quick, get me a fire extinguisher, the sauce has started on fire!
    Mrs. Jetson, I see your extinguisher is getting old. Would you not prefer a new extinguisher certified in all 50 states including the new California standard? I find 7 models available, 4 with prime memberships and 2 with same day shipping? Shall I order the highest rated extinguisher for you?
    No! Rosie, quick! bring me the one under the sink!
    I'm sorry Mrs. Jetson, I see that your existing extinguisher does not comply with the latest OSHA standards, and as such, liability exclusions in section 34, sub paragraph 15 of the End user Licence agreement mandate I am not allowed to interface with non-compliant items. Would you like me to tell read that sub paragraph to you?
    No thank you Rosie. the kitchen just burned down.

  27. Lab126? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Lab126 still actually hiring? I saw their job posting and my resume is a great fit for it(Embedded work, mostly). I submitted a resume but never heard back from Lab126. About a week later I got a call back from their AWS team instead. The AWS folks are being super shady about the job description though - pushing to fly me up without actually telling me what the work is for... I may do it just to see what the job actually entails.

  28. What's it for? by ath1901 · · Score: 1

    So the news is that Amazon might build a "home robot" but nobody knows what it might do. Have Alexa follow you around the house? Great... That's underwhelming to say the least.

    What could you possibly do with small floor based robot with no limbs? The only useful thing I can think of is to remove the camera and stick a vacuum cleaner in there. I'm sure no one has thought of that yet...

    1. Re:What's it for? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of the house keeping machine featured on the Jetsons. It was funny then, now?

    2. Re:What's it for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the bot is gonna suck alright, just not the carpet. Well, if the owner is female...

  29. OK Amazon, Here Is What I Need by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    A machine that can clean my 3 story home; no, I am not joking. This machine also has to be able to repair and maintain my home. I would respectfully suggest getting this request "full filled." Honestly, I am already looking. Cooking will be the next requested upgrade.

  30. Re:Rosie! Get me a fire extinguisher! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Well, using accidents that happen the home would be a good way to test the device. Also, the test that simulates a Tornado.

  31. suspicious promo codes... by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Should have been more suspicious about that promo code, CIAFBIFSB

  32. Nope. by briancox2 · · Score: 1

    Not any more they don't.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
  33. Re:I can't wait for it to respond to a request wit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siri already does it.

    Ask it to permanently disable itself. See for yourself.

  34. What a load of bs (u think we're stupid?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zontar The Mindless it's YOU (like "ZIP"/TrollingForHostsFiles sockpuppet) & why https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12017031&cid=56490553/

    * It even leads to a MORE detailed link of your personal "issues" (huge) - don't take your shitty life out on me - you start it, & I finish it (& YOU WITH IT, easily).

    APK

    P.S.=> I only BLOW YOU AWAY w/ facts (e.g. - https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...> when you attack ME, 1st (as always & you get all "butthurt" doing what I note above HERE & more in that link + what it leads to as proof)... apk

  35. LOL! Registered /. user peers prove you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon February 11 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * Want more? Ask!

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject & EAT YOUR WORDS (Reply to yourself to "bury" my replies? Yes - you're so transparent it's not even funny)... apk

  36. Guaranteed to Fail by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
    Just like Google Glasses.

    The key phrase: "the company hopes to begin seeding the robots in employees' homes". The pool of Google employees is a demographic that relates to no other demographic in the world except other massive Silicon Valley companies or Microsoft. What other group is extremely well educated, has a high income, an extremely skewed rate of people on the Asperger spectrum, very limited cultural diversity, a glaring lack of women, and is completely immersed in technology?

    Let's face it: Google workers often don't even have a home life. They're at work all the time. Some of them live in dorms or sleep in their cars.

    So how is testing with that group going to be any help when it comes to making a robot work with normal households? Normal homes have old people, babies, children, pets, visitors, repair workers, cleaning people, etc. There are shut ins and people with physical and mental impairments. It can be a changing cast of characters or a fixed set of people.

    Just like facial recognition, there will not be enough diversity to cover real world situations. Xbox face tracking failed at first because the training sets were mostly white men, so when women or people of different backgrounds were trying to use the system they were not recognized as trackable faces. Same with Apple face recognition software.

    Silicon Valley never learns. They are in a near impenetrable bubble of their own making. When it comes to deployment in the real world, they always come up short. (Now think about how well self driving cars are going to perform when they are widely used...)

    --
    Why is Snark Required?