Slashdot Mirror


China is Now Monitoring Employees' Brainwaves and Emotions (fastcompany.com)

From a report: The Orwellian-as-all-get-out practice is being conducted using "emotional surveillance technology" by both businesses in China and the country's military, reports the South China Morning Post. The tech uses small wireless sensors embedded in employees' hats that can monitor brainwaves. That brainwave data is then analyzed by AI to tell when an employee is tired, anxious, or even full of rage. One company using the brain-monitoring tech says profits have increased by $315 million since rolling it out way back in 2014. Other uses of the tech include monitoring drivers of trains to tell if they've fallen asleep or are at risk of doing so. It's important to note the technology cannot read people's thoughts.

70 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Phrenology at a different level by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We barely understand how emotions work and now we want to monitor emotions in people who have every reason to hide them?

    Good luck...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Phrenology at a different level by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 2

      EEG can really tell how alert you are - if you are starting to drift, so I think it is fine for drivers, pilots, dangerous machine operators etc. Fine and proven technology. Emotions? Not yet.

    2. Re:Phrenology at a different level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My first thought was, what a great way to better understand how the brain works. I just wish it wasn't being practiced/trained by eastasia...or was it eurasia...

    3. Re:Phrenology at a different level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The more you think you have something to hide, the more China wants to know about it.

      And they don't need 100% hitrate. They only need to cow you into restricting yourself to thinking only part-approved thoughts and feeling party-approved feelings. They've managed that without the tech for going on how long already? This is just an incremental refinement, not a revolution.

    4. Re:Phrenology at a different level by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      They really want to examine every shit from you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Phrenology at a different level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A system with lots of noise and false positives is perfect for the intended application.

      You just ignore it except when you want a pretense for punishing somone. Then having selected the person you want to find something wrong with you wait for their feed to have a random blip and pounce. You point to the data that says they were emotionally unstable or whatever and claim to have saved the day by putting them away. Do it infrequently enough that on average the risk is negligible and only to one person at a time and you can put away quite a lot of people that way.

    6. Re:Phrenology at a different level by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      We can't identify feelings or emotions (many people erroneously conflate the two) even with the most advanced and cumbersome brain imaging technologies, e.g. fMRI & PET.

      However, it's relatively easy to measure people's levels of cognitive arousal. I think we should introduce these arousal sensor hats for senators, congressmen, members of parliament, etc.. It'd be great to see when they're making evidence-informed rational decisions or just acting out of some incidental state of arousal. It could tell us a lot about the misattribution of arousal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... in our political decision-making processes, especially for our current stable geniuses in leadership in the USA and UK at the moment.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    7. Re:Phrenology at a different level by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      This sort of thing makes me so ANGRY.

      ****zzzztttt****

      Ahh. better now

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    8. Re:Phrenology at a different level by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      "We" is perhaps the most potentially dangerous word in such discussions. Though "they" is not far behind it, and may be worse.

      Notice how the antecedents are different in the two uses? And how one of the uses doesn't even include the person using it? (I'm assuming he or she doesn't run any businesses or military organizations in China.)

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. Yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's important to note the technology cannot read people's thoughts.

    YET!

    1. Re:Yet! by gtall · · Score: 1

      Ummm...why? To quote Professor Snape, “The mind is not a book, to be opened at will and examined at leisure. Thoughts are not etched on the inside of skulls, to be perused by an invader. The mind is a complex and many-layered thing.”

      That seems apropos. The brain itself has various parts that work in parallel. What part of it contains the mind that it may be read? It is likely there is no single part, so that parallel parts contents would have to be assembled into a coherent picture. That itself is a moving target because the brain is not static.

      The concept of mind is more abstract than the brain in which it resides. Just what precisely is "the mind"? If anything, it is a process so there is no "reading" it once, assuming it can be "read" at all. Any reader would have to sense trajectories. Yet the trajectories continually get interrupted by outside events, or internal events that are seemingly outside any current trajectory of conscious thought. And it isn't clear there are single trajectories to a stream of consciousness. Many scientists appear to work on problems in the "background", so which trajectory is the main one? How would we discern the difference. How many trajectories are there? They appear to branch promiscuously.

      For me, mind-reading is so ill-defined as to be an incoherent concept.

    2. Re:Yet! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      As soon as it does, there will be a lot less crime, faster court proceedings, and better politicians. Bring it on!

  3. Tin foil hats by Mordaximus · · Score: 2

    They made fun of me decades ago, but who's got the last laugh now!

    1. Re:Tin foil hats by Junta · · Score: 4, Funny

      They have the last laugh. Little do you know they put the sensors *right in the tinfoil*. You *thought* you were protecting yourself but you just played right into their hands.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Tin foil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A tin foil hat would probably increase conductivity, making the brain scanners more accurate.

    3. Re:Tin foil hats by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      A tin foil hat would probably increase conductivity, making the brain scanners more accurate.

      Yep, the whole tin-foil hat thing was secretly promulgated by the government to make it easier to track and monitor the people who can see through all of the government's tricks and lies. That's why I built a farraday cage around my head. Now I just have to deal with people asking me why I have a copper birdcage on my head.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  4. Re:"China" by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably because the biggest Chinese corporations are in fact state run...

    What I don't understand is why idiots seem to forget that China is still a totalitarian regime with no real concept of human rights. Slather as much lipstick on that pig as you like, its still a place where if you don't show proper deference to the ruling party you can end up in prison or worse. Heck the forced abortions only stopped in 2k13 and we kinda take their word for it they really have stopped.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  5. $315 million increase in profits? by aicrules · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their publicly disclosed net income went from about $130 million in 2014 to $160 million in 2016 and then dropped considerably to about $65 million in 2017? Couldn't possibly be exaggerating or just plain lying right?

    1. Re:$315 million increase in profits? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Their publicly disclosed net income

      There it is. Obviously the Chinese government was paying them under the table to use their employees as guinea pigs to test the brainwave technology. Personally, if I were a Chinese citizen, I would be a little wary if they started handing out free hats at the next Party meeting.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:$315 million increase in profits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't let the facts get in the way of propaganda. They need people to think it's effective so they don't reject the idea.

    3. Re:$315 million increase in profits? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      Maybe there is such a thing as GROSS Profit vs NET Profit, but hey -- what do I know?

    4. Re:$315 million increase in profits? by aicrules · · Score: 1

      Well it's not much of an improvement if the net profit doesn't go up. I'd even give them the benefit of the doubt if net profit rose proportionally. But since it dropped considerably that $315 million increase is meaningless even if there is an actual on the books number that it comes from.

    5. Re:$315 million increase in profits? by aicrules · · Score: 1

      They did have a stock price increase that could be correlated to a 2014 implementation. But since mid-2016 the stock has been on a steady decline. Obviously these are neither indicators of this specific activity directly impacting profitability, but still brings their claim into question. Being unwilling to give details of the program also makes it questionable.

  6. Positive Uses by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    That might be a great idea if 100% of the people are required all to use the device except for Trump. He has no brain waves to study at all.

    1. Re:Positive Uses by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      Do you want Psycho Pass? Because this is how you get Psycho Pass...

      "The story takes place in an authoritarian future dystopia, where omnipresent public sensors continuously scan the mental states of every passing citizen. Collected data on both present mentality and aggregated personality data is used to gauge the probability of that citizen committing a crime, the rating referred to as that citizen's Psycho-Pass. Authorities are alerted whenever excessive ratings are detected, and officers of the Public Safety Bureau are dispatched with weapons called "Dominators", energy pistols that modulate their power in response to the target's Psycho Pass"

  7. dystopian future from Snowcrash by perotbot · · Score: 2

    This is what L. Bob Reif was after in snowcrash, I'm not sure I want to live in this future

    --
    ~corporate tool, but employed~
  8. Re:Leftists are Envious by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last I checked both sides lie to further their agenda.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:Leftists are Envious by jimtheowl · · Score: 2

    Lets not confuse a dripping tap with Niagara Falls.

  10. Re:Leftists are Envious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was just reading an article on the BBC about a row over "cultural appropriation" because a girl wore a chinese style dress. If free speech rights extend to freedom of expressing yourself, I'm going to say the left doesn't have much of a leg to stand on with free speech rights right now. In my day, wearing something from another culture, so long as not done in a mocking way, was celebrating diversity, I guess that's wrong now. Toss in PC culture which attempts to silence anyone who says "disagreeable" things, and well....yeah.

  11. Re:"China" by Volatile_Memory · · Score: 2

    Those of you not aware of the Chinese 16-Character Policy probably should be...

    --

    /**
    I have a "Zero Policy" tolerance.
    */

  12. Re:Leftists are Envious by sycodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which side supports free speech rights

    The side that doesn't throw a riot when a speaker comes to campus?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  13. When I read one of these articles... by skids · · Score: 1

    ...I recoil the same way everyone else does.

    But at the same time, I also lament that tech like this could actually work for our betterment, if only we could find a way to ensure it was deployed by trustworthy people with adequate safeguards against misuse. For example this could identify people who need some form of support to get them out of whatever rut they are in (rather than labeling them as undesirables, throwing them on the trash heap, and hiring someone else o retrain from scratch). It could be as simple as them having a crappy sleep environment but not having the knowledge to figure that out and fix it. An investment of under a grand and they could be at the top of their game in weeks. Instead things just drone on as they are, no progress made.

    It seems most cultures have disastrously undervalued the things that build up such communal trust, especially now in the Social Networking age. Corrosive practices like trolling have everyone thinking the worst of everyone else, and even explicit efforts to build trust webs (like China's social ranking system) backfire and only serve to bring out the worst competitive backbiting behaviors. Truly a shame.

    1. Re:When I read one of these articles... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I also lament that tech like this could actually work for our betterment, if only we could find a way to ensure it was deployed by trustworthy people with adequate safeguards against misuse.

      There's an easy solution to that - don't fucking network it. The vast majority of people who are spinning out of control don't know it. Just telling them they have an issue can get a lot of people to seek help.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:When I read one of these articles... by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      if only we could find a way to ensure it was deployed by trustworthy people with adequate safeguards against misuse

      Said of every privacy invasive technology ever invented. It has not happened yet. I don't see any evidence whatsoever from any time in history that something privacy invasive has not employed in an abusive fashion at relatively high frequency. I have not even see much evidence to suggest measures to address the abuse after the fact really put an end to it; except in very small examples either geographically or in narrowness of rule. Take HIPPA for example. I do pen-testing - medical industry pretty often - I get PII Medical data almost all the time. Its not safe - even if they follow the rules because the rules are so watered down and their is little real accountability; no matter what the law supposedly is.

      I hate to play the role of the Luddite but all the evidence is people just can't be trusted with things like this.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:When I read one of these articles... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      But at the same time, I also lament that tech like this could actually work for our betterment...

      Pre-crime

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:When I read one of these articles... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Don't be stupid - ALL of that technology is being used to invade your privacy. I never claimed ALL of that technology was ONLY being used to invade your privacy. Yes I do pen testing that is why I understand things like side channels and unintended information disclosures etc. Clearly you don't

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  14. Black Mirror again by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    China forgot that Black Mirror is a TV show, not an instructional video.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
    1. Re:Black Mirror again by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      1984 worked great as an instructional book for them, why wouldn't they move on once they completed that?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re: Black Mirror again by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      They haven't moved on from 1984 as much as they've run out of things to implement from the book.

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
    3. Re: Black Mirror again by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      That was my point. They implemented everything from 1984 and have moved on to implementing things from more recent sources. Like Black Mirror. Not "no longer do 1984" moved on, outgrew cause it didn't imagine smartphones and AI moved on.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  15. I'm looking at you, THX1138. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Supposedly the right and left loves of the brain control the left and right limbs, respectively. Thus left handers are rightminded. That is what you meant by leftists, right?

    Next up based on your brainwave evidence you will be arrested for drug evasion. I'm looking at you thx1138, you dumb threep.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  16. funny hats by White+Yeti · · Score: 2

    More fun than tinfoil, put it in cat ears!

  17. Real Headline by fedos · · Score: 2

    China Uses Pseudoscience as Excuse to Punish Employees

  18. Re:Leftists are Envious by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "I was just reading an article on the BBC about a row over "cultural appropriation" because a girl wore a chinese style dress."

    Don't you know, that the new political correctness.

    It's also in the movie business, only real Indians can play Indians, only Africans can play Africans and I guess for SF it will soon mean that only Martians can play Martians.

  19. Hawthorne Effect by notil · · Score: 1

    Hmm....pretty complicated to detect things like depression with an EEG cap. Stress, may be easier...Still, I'm skeptical that this "huge boost in profits" doesn't just come from scaring people into thinking that their thoughts are being read.

  20. Just remove your cap ... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    ...before going postal.

  21. Re:Yet... by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but it was correct before you changed it. There may come a technology that can read people's thoughts, in some sense, but this won't be it, and it won't be a straightforward development of this technology. I'd be really surprised if it didn't require surgery.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  22. Re:Use It To Detect Hate Speech by HiThere · · Score: 1

    As reported (and as I believe) it can't actually detect emotions. It sounds like what it detects is level of arousal, but it's probably a bit more specific than that. It might well detect arousal of Alpha, Beta, Delta waves. (IIRC, Delta waves ramp up as you drop off to sleep.)

    OTOH, I expect they've also got a temperature sensor, which they didn't mention, to detect blood flow near the forehead. Hot headed isn't just a figure of speech.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  23. Re:Leftists are Envious by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Which side supports free speech rights

    Not the side with the cries for censorship, "hate speech" laws, etc.

    which side complains about the "lies" of the liberal media and their inauguration crowd numbers?

    Everyone but the liberals.

    You haven't asked the important question. Which side is correct? (Hint: It's not the liberals.)

  24. Of course by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    One company using the brain-monitoring tech says profits have increased by $315 million since rolling it out way back in 2014.

    This company makes and sells brain-monitoring equipment.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  25. This is an old scam by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    This scam is as old as the hills. It's easy to get the government to buy a bunch of garbage, here in the USA they sell airport security machines and "lie detectors"

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:This is an old scam by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      As opposed to companies wisely buying McKinsey Consultants and Six-Sigma black belts.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:This is an old scam by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That's a relatively newer scam.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    3. Re:This is an old scam by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      McKinsley (founded 1926) is "newer" than brain reading machines, millimeter wave cameras or even modern lie detectors?Heck, Six Sigma is older than the first two.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  26. Re:Leftists are Envious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You seem to be assuming that all on the left have identical views, and none support free speech. It isn't the case.

  27. What do you keep in your little box? by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Cells.

  28. Re:Leftists are Envious by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You do know that both sides accuse the other one of being the Niagara Falls, yes?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Re:Leftists are Envious by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long I may still eat Chinese food.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Re:Leftists are Envious by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

    Nice try, but we both know which side has brought up the level of discourse to what it is.

  31. Re:Leftists are Envious by not+flu · · Score: 1

    That's easy, just look at what gets deleted off youtube and you have your answer. Hint: it's not the left.

  32. Re:Leftists are Envious by not+flu · · Score: 1

    Given the context of grandparent post it's obvious your shit just got called out and now you resort to this? Weak.

  33. Re:Leftists are Envious by not+flu · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, not throwing riots to suppress speakers on campus. Classic fascist tactic. Do you get paid to flame non-commies or to give fascists a good name?

  34. Re:The "forced abortions" were the onl thing ... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    First off India is actually by most measures modernizing more rapidly than China and growing a pace economically speaking. Second put on your thinking cap here. One child is below the replacement rate.

    So it was never really one child it was one child unless you were part of the elite ruling class, in which case it was many children. So the policy was always about using human beings as automatons, you and your family don't matter you exist to serve the sate nothing more. It was not about "we will drown" it was about enriching some at the direct expense of others.

    Second poverty not affluence is responsible for most environmental destruction. Affluent people made decisions like "I will pay a higher cost to keep the place around me nice" "I'll invest in more efficient energy sources so I don't deforest the landscape for cooking and heating fuel while dirtying the air". "I'll use birth control because two kids is enough with modern medicine to carry on our family, machines can replace the labor and we can all enjoy a better life style". Those are choices affluent people make, because they have choices. Look at the stats - if certain political forces were not hell bent on letting anyone from anywhere (usually very poor places) immigrate here the US population would be stable today and that is without totalitarian control!

    You have to become affluent in the first place though, and Chinese policy was not about lifting all ships, it was about lifting few and still is, the fact that they have allowed a little wealth to trickle down finally is ONLY because they think that will enable the rules to become even more wealthy and even more powerful.

    19th and 20th Century American Capitalism is better for people, the planet, and promises a brighter future than any other system ever has been or is ever likely to be. Exponential growth in population isn't possible (but nobody really intended that forever) but exponential growth in wealth probably is possible because with enough cheap energy most things are possible. Don't forget there is giant ball fusion dumping terrawatts on us every day. There is fission we can harness now, probably fusion directly sometime in the next generation or two.

    Literally most of societal problems today are the direct impact of 20th century socialist ideas that were allowed to take root here and leftist idiots continue to cling to despite the horror and damage they cause. The Great Society is not the solution to poverty and the wealth gap in America today its the ROOT CAUSE.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  35. Re:Leftists are Envious by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Not trying anything. It's simply what both sides claim. Yeah, we lie, but THE OTHERS are way worse.

    Yeah. Sure. In the end, I wish the left and right would come together like matter and antimatter and annihilate each other in a flash so we sane people could start rebuilding finally.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Re:Leftists are Envious by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

    Correct to a point, but it is a mute point.

    One does not have to rely on claims from either sides to observe what is really happening.

  37. Gives them a day off when they need it? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    I'd like to think that Chinese companies want to ensure that their workers remain happy and don't burn out. Too much stress and the boss comes over with a nice cup of tea and some biscuits. Is that the idea?!!

  38. Re:Leftists are Envious by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    But that's pretty much what people do. Nobody is looking for what really is anymore. Everyone just waits 'til someone spews something that fits their own world view and that becomes the truth because someone else said it.

    You can say the worst bullshit, as long as it fits someone's narrative it becomes their reality.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Re:Leftists are Envious by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

    Assuming that by 'what people do' you mean what most people do.

    If you get that impression from television, try watching less of it (even cut the cord) and if you get it from your surroundings, meet new people.
    On the other hand, if you are seduced by the apparent results of these self serving opportunists and wishes to emulate their behavior, I wish you the worse.

    Hopefully, you are stating what you are observing and not proposing a modus operandi.

    This behavior is not a new thing and has been shown to be the precursor to the fall of empires.

  40. Re:Leftists are Envious by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I have no TV. I know no people who feel the urge to spew propaganda. Where I observe that is for example here. Take a look around the boards and you'll find that, no matter the topic, some goofball will feel the urge to throw in how Trump will save us or how he should be thrown in jail or how Hillary is a (insert random insult here).

    I remember a time when there was actually sensible discussion possible here. And I'm not talking about a sensible discussion about politics (that I have never seen, neither here nor anywhere) but one concerning technology and its development and use. From time to time, something like this emerges, like a brave little flower breaking out of the concrete of political bickering, only to be instantly derailed and taken over by this bickering. Like, say, this subthread. Started out as a bit about how emotions are barely understood and you can't sensible measure and control them and now we're talking again about whether the left or the right of the political spectrum are worse offenders when it comes to thought control.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. Re:Leftists are Envious by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

    "I have no TV. I know no people who feel the urge to spew propaganda."

    Kudos for that.

    If its worth anything, this sub-thread allowed me to get to know you a little better, and I mean that in a positive way.