Slashdot Mirror


Nigerian Email Scammers Are More Effective Than Ever (wired.com)

You would think that after decades of analyzing and fighting email spam, there'd be a fix by now for the internet's oldest hustle -- the Nigerian Prince scam. But the problem, a new report suggests, has only grown to become more widespread and sophisticated. From the report: There's generally more awareness that a West African noble demanding $1,000 in order to send you millions is a scam, but the underlying logic of these "pay a little, get a lot" schemes, also known as 419 fraud, still ensnares a ton of people. In fact, groups of fraudsters in Nigeria continue to make millions off of these classic cons. And they haven't just refined the techniques and expanded their targets -- they've gained minor celebrity status for doing it.

On Thursday, the security firm Crowdstrike published detailed findings on Nigerian confraternities, cultish gangs that engage in various criminal activities and have steadily evolved email fraud into a reliable cash cow. The groups, like the notorious Black Axe syndicate, have mastered the creation of compelling and credible-looking fraud emails. Crowdstrike notes that the groups aren't very regimented or technically sophisticated, but flexibility and camaraderie still allow them to develop powerful scams.

129 comments

  1. It is a form of taxation. by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, by this point, after decades of reports on it, I wouldn't call it "fraud" exactly, more like some sort of tax... Idiot tax? Greed tax? Take your pick.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:It is a form of taxation. by mark-t · · Score: 2

      No, that's lotteries.

    2. Re:It is a form of taxation. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to TFA, these guys are stepping up their game though. They use phishing techniques, get company servers infected with some commodity malware that lets them snoop around, then they can spear-phish using intraoffice email. If you have access to someone's inbox and a rough idea about the company's inner workings, it's not at all hard to impersonate that person convincingly. Perhaps enough to re-route some cash or get some account numbers changed. Or - especially in smaller companies - they simply intercept emails with payment details and change the data.

      Scams like those might be prevented with proper security and procedures, but they are way outside the realm of simple idiocy.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:It is a form of taxation. by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Funny

      The biggest problem for me is, I am an actual Nigerian Prince and I want to transfer several million out of the country, but I can't find anyone to take it because of all these fraudsters. All I want is for someone to send me $1000, and I'll send them 100 million of which they can keep 10%. But nobody believes me thanks to these crooks. Any tips?

    4. Re:It is a form of taxation. by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      If you go that direction, my vote would be for the P.T. Barnum tax.

    5. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that is completely different from the classic 419 the summary talks about.

    6. Re:It is a form of taxation. by bobbied · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, send me the 100 Million as an electronic money transfer to the brokerage account I just opened for you, keeping $2000 in cash for yourself...To make the accounting easy, I've left it with a zero balance for now. I suggest you not use Western Union, but approach the bank where your money is on deposit, I'm sure if you really have that much on deposit, they can easily direct you into the proper way to do this, just show up in person. No, I won't take a check, not even a cashiers check, only electronic money transfers.

      THEN, after I pay all the income taxes required by my country which takes at least a year, you are welcome to 90% of what's left.... Just show up at my door and provide proof that it's you. My address? Why yes, it's 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, come armed and tell the guards you won't take no as an answer and you don't need an appointment, they will take care of you.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you have access to someone's inbox and a rough idea about the company's inner workings, it's not at all hard to impersonate that person convincingly.

      Dearest Robert M. Jones in Engineering,

      We are Sally from Accounting! It is with great mercy and humble that we hereby implore for the urgent help with a great matter. It is our uncle the dearest Reverend Robert Snabo from Customer Support who did thereby become gravely ill with the gall cancer, and we must remit a sum of $1,000,000 for his immediate curation. Due to the terrible situation here in Accounting, we would pleased to send you a cheque for the sum of $1,050,000, with the balance $50,000 Yours to keep if you will help us here in Accounting by cashing this cheque and forwarding the remainder sum of $1,000,000 to our agent who will henceby contact You.

      We in Accounting are deeply religious and we know that You are an honourable person humble with God and that you may will help the dearest Reverend Robert Snabo of Customer Support with his cancer treatments.

      Dearest blessings upon your family and may the Creator be with us in our time of great need, here in Accounting.

      Yours in deepest condolence, Sally Jessica Green, Accounting.

    8. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fool and his money....

      I worked at a place as email admin. a few years ago. I pulled a email out of the spam pile for a user. It was a exchange between them and a Nigerian scammer. The user was a old guy in his 80's and had sending money to these scammers for years, and still expecting to get millions some time down the road.

      The CEO told me to dig in to his account and found out how much he had sent. Turns out he had sent them his grand kids college money, mortgaged his house, his wife had divorced him, and his whole life was basically be soaked up by this scam.

      I was ordered to block all contact with him and he scammer, which I happily did. Some higher ups got involved. The old fool got his lawyer involved and in the end I was instructed to unblock his account and let him go on his merry way.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    9. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      God I wish hadn't spent all my mod points. That was good.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    10. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How exactly is the parent poster wrong? People spend millions every year on lotto tickets because they don't understand the most basic of financial calculations. The expected value of a risky asset, like a lottery ticket, is [(Present value of payout x Odds of payout) - Cost]. If that is negative, it's a bad deal, and like most forms of gambling lotto tickets are almost always negative, and therefore a poor investment. Still, so people hold on to the 'can't win if you don't play' mindset, and all but a very lucky few and worse off for it. Basic financial/statistical literacy says it is a poor call. Pointing that out isn't 'edgy,' it is math.

    11. Re:It is a form of taxation. by michelcolman · · Score: 0

      My address? Why yes, it's 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, come armed and tell the guards you won't take no as an answer and you don't need an appointment, they will take care of you.

      Wait a minute, I know that place, it's that big white mansion surrounded by a fence and guards everywhere, right? Now I know how you got to be so rich...

    12. Re:It is a form of taxation. by arth1 · · Score: 2

      If a return was the only point of gambling, you'd be correct.
      However, people pay for the thrill of gambling.

      You lose money if you go on a rollercoaster ride too, but still some people do it, for the thrill. Others find it a waste of money, but who are they to judge how others choose to spend theirs?

    13. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      If that is negative, it's a bad deal, and like most forms of gambling lotto tickets are almost always negative, and therefore a poor investment.

      While you are not entirely wrong, that is the position of someone who is financially OK.

      If you are poor, with poor prospects, then the negative amount is the cost of buying a chance of getting out of the mess.

      If you buy a lottery ticket for $1, then the impact on your life of losing that $1 is not great. You probably spend a lot of other dollars on uselessness - in fact a dollar spent on alcohol will likely likely do you more harm than if you spent it on the lottery. However, If you win, even $5, you are better off, at least for your next 5 bets, and if you win big, the rest of your life does not suck. Think about it - if your life sucks, how many weeks would you NOT spend $1 because MAYBE the rest of your life won't suck?

      Really, if you are dirt poor, spending $1 on the lottery is a great investment. Spending $2? not so much.

      Honest, real maths and psychology professors made this assessment, not me. Obviously, saving your dollars for a couple of years and buying shares with the $100 instead of buying lottery tickets MIGHT be a better investment, but then again, maybe the shares are in Enron or something run by the next Madoff.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    14. Re: It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually they explain that the money is tied up somehow. Stuck in customs, locked in a warehouse, tied up in some financial instrument, etc. That they can't directly access. The victim is typically lead to believe that the money is, effectively, stolen, and that they are participating in what is basically some form of money laundering. The details vary, but they want the person falling for the scam to believe that they are participating in something at least vaguely criminal. Few people will go to the police to complain that they were scammed while trying to launder money, for example. The language and spelling and details also intentionally contain what should be giant red flags for most people. They're looking for suckers. They want people who will look at a super obvious scam and not realize it.

    15. Re:It is a form of taxation. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      No state has higher fraud than Florida. Real slime balls out there taking advantage of the elderly. And you know what, it PAYS BIG TIME!!!....right up until the fuckers get thrown in the slammer. But for everyone they put away, X amount more engage in this.

      Oh, and the baby boomers haven't peaked in retirement. They're just waiting for the massive FL influx to pounce.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    16. Re:It is a form of taxation. by DonkeyG5 · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between people who play lottery thinking that they are going to win and it's going to fix their lives and those who play it just for fun.

    17. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      While doing that same email gig I got a email from some Nigerian scammer about the millions that awaited me if I would just help a fellow out. I responded that I was the grand negas and how dare he waste my time with his pathetic scam. As punishment I had used my awesome magical powers to succor his soul. Unless he showed up at my door with the "funds" his email promised me in hand I would be forced to sell his soul to a demon to recoup my costs.

      While I never expected a reply or anything to come of this but a chuckle on my part. I did briefly wonder what I would do if some poor fucker showed up on my doorstep with a foot locker full of cash looking to buy his soul.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    18. Re:It is a form of taxation. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Think about it - if your life sucks, how many weeks would you NOT spend $1 because MAYBE the rest of your life won't suck?

      Why spend a dollar on a *remote* chance that it might result in improvement when that dollar can still do some actual good now?

      And I'm speaking as one whose life did actually suck (at least relative to what I could see around me) for a good portion of his adult life. Back then, while the money that I could have spent on lottery tickets wouldn't have actually hurt that much to lose, in the end it was far better spent on things like bus fare, buying an extra couple of loaves of bread or other similar aspects of survival.

    19. Re:It is a form of taxation. by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Just for fun? Throwing money away willfully, is fun? BS. They think that they may reasonably win. They have no clue that their chances are negligible.

    20. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think many people buy fucking powerball tickets as an investment strategy.
      It's more like "it's $10, fuck it, why not?" (besides, don't state lotteries fund public works programs and such?)

      It's a bit like seeing someone smoking and chiming in "hey, don't you know those are bad for you?"

      Of course they 'know' -- they keep smoking because they don't care. (And also probably think you are a gigantic, annoying douche.)

    21. Re:It is a form of taxation. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That, or he comes looking for said cash he comes looking for said cash!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    22. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're the right guards to help you. The Secret Service is is a department of the US Treasury, which is supposed to handle various forms of bank fraud. Sadly, they do not: they gave up on any kind of hacking or computer fraud in 1990 when they completely screwed up "Operation SunDevil" and failed to get a single conviction against the hundreds of computer hackers they pursued nationwide.

    23. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I could see that as a problem.....

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    24. Re:It is a form of taxation. by HyperQuantum · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should look into Bitcoin.

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    25. Re:It is a form of taxation. by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, with easy access to credit being the norm in Western countries (even for individuals with bad credit scores) the rest of us are paying for the debts the idiots of society rack up (by falling victims to Nigerian scams and/or buying vehicles and electronics they can't afford) by a process known as bank bailouts. Please note I do not include in this people who acquired debt via medical expenses or other misfortune.

    26. Re:It is a form of taxation. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Just for fun? Throwing money away willfully, is fun? BS. They think that they may reasonably win. They have no clue that their chances are negligible.

      You don't seem to know much about human nature. Most people buying lottery tickets are fully aware than their chance of winning is negligible. They don't do it to "win".

      When there is an office lottery pool, I will chip in and participate just because it is the social thing to do.

    27. Re:It is a form of taxation. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      if you win big, the rest of your life does not suck.

      This is incorrect. For most lottery winners, their life temporarily sucks less, but they soon fall back below even their pre-win level of suckage. They usually squander their winnings, but often take on debt that they can't afford once the money is gone.

    28. Re: It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all this time I thought I was just good at spotting foreign scammers because of their bad English... I better just stop reading email now that I know they COULD have written an email to fool me also and just chose not to

    29. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly is the parent poster wrong? People spend millions every year on lotto tickets because they don't understand the most basic of financial calculations. The expected value of a risky asset, like a lottery ticket, is [(Present value of payout x Odds of payout) - Cost]. If that is negative, it's a bad deal, and like most forms of gambling lotto tickets are almost always negative, and therefore a poor investment. Still, so people hold on to the 'can't win if you don't play' mindset, and all but a very lucky few and worse off for it. Basic financial/statistical literacy says it is a poor call. Pointing that out isn't 'edgy,' it is math.

      Seems like it's you who fail to understand math. Statistics comprise more than a mean value or insurance would be pointless. It isn't because it protects against life-changing events of the bad kind. Lotteries are similar in that they are about life-changing events in return for a mean investment, just that they open an opportunity for good such events rather than closing an opportunity for bad such events.

      Either are pointless when the possible payout sums would not make a qualitative difference to your budget: in that case, it's only the mean that counts.

    30. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lottery is a greed tax and a nigerian scammer is an idiot tax

    31. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's Sally.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    32. Re:It is a form of taxation. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I think they have moved away from the Nigerian prince. Bill Gates tried to give me money last week but I told him to fuck off.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    33. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The expected value of a risky asset, like a lottery ticket, is [(Present value of payout x Odds of payout) - Cost]. If that is negative, it's a bad deal, and like most forms of gambling lotto tickets are almost always negative, and therefore a poor investment. [...] Pointing that out isn't 'edgy,' it is math.

      What you are overlooking is that "value of payout" is not a linear function of money, nor is "cost". Nobody is playing the lottery as an investment scheme, though for people playing it for decades, it effectively turns into one.

    34. Re:It is a form of taxation. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It's not that one may think they may reasonably win as much as they think that the chance of winning is still not zero.

      They may realize their chances are negligible, but play anyways because they figure that the cost of buying the number of tiickets that they do is not any more significant to them.

    35. Re:It is a form of taxation. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You must be fun at a party:
      You know what, I play the lottery. Two dollars every time it gets high. My odds of winning? Effectively zero. But you know what, that two bucks gives me a little bit of mental gymnastics to play with on what I might do if I won. Which I know I won't.
      Do I buy ten, twenty, fifty? No. I buy one.

    36. Re:It is a form of taxation. by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Guess you missed the post about people who buy thrills with roller-coasters rather than lottery tickets. Or maybe you just didn't understand it.

      Either way, I'm not going to explain it.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. Wrong header by Teun · · Score: 1

    Wrong header
    It should read: Ever more stupid and greedy people online.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Wrong header by magarity · · Score: 2

      Wrong header

      It should read: Ever more stupid and greedy people online.

      Paying well-forged invoices is neither stupid nor greedy.

  3. They deserve their money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helping to clean the gene pool obviously merits some compensation.

  4. compelling and credible-looking fraud emails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that were the case, I'd expect their success to be reflected in a higher ratio of such mails in my sizable spam volume. But in the "compelling and credible-looking" category, I so far have to declare them batting zero. And it's not for lack of volume, either.

  5. 419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

    1. Re:419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Isn't that what.... the Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

      Not really, I'm pretty sure the Clintons would have paid their debts to their friends and financiers if they had won, and everyone funneling money to a political family or candidate understands that there is a substantial risk of failure in a democracy. It's probably why the money needed to pay off Democrats and Republicans is so small, especially considering how mighty the USG actually is, compared with someone who wields more absolute power over a smaller area, such as seen in a monarchy, fascism, communist "utopia", or whatever else inevitably devolves into a totalitarian hellhole.

    2. Re:419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      The Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

      No, that would have been a sound investment.

      The actual scam from 2016 was: Send us money now, and we'll "drain the swamp"!

    3. Re:419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

      No, that would have been a sound investment.

      The actual scam from 2016 was: Send us money now, and we'll "drain the swamp"!

      I hear a gurgling sound coming from the general direction of DC and I've been seeing a lot of running in clockwise circles on TV.... I think you are wrong on this one..

  6. Forget the prince... by The+Fat+Bastard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend fell hard for an American nurse he meet over the Internet who works for a hospital in Nigeria. This "relationship" went on for a whole year. When he lost his job and started having financial difficulties, I found out about his Internet girlfriend and started asking his questions. It was too late. He wired his entire savings of $5K on the promise that he would get back his money plus $10K to "hold" for her until she got back to the US. When the check didn't show up, the amount that he would hold gradually increased to $20K. He got mad when I told him he got scammed by a Nigarian confidence scammer. The only proof that he has that this "woman" exist are pictures and texts. No video, no audio. A year later he is still waiting for his check, still thinks he has a girlfriend and believes that she is the victim of the Nigerian government because the president is too ill to sign anyone's paycheck.

    1. Re:Forget the prince... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      A friend fell hard for an American nurse he meet over the Internet who works for a hospital in Nigeria. This "relationship" went on for a whole year. When he lost his job and started having financial difficulties, I found out about his Internet girlfriend and started asking his questions. It was too late. He wired his entire savings of $5K on the promise that he would get back his money plus $10K to "hold" for her until she got back to the US. When the check didn't show up, the amount that he would hold gradually increased to $20K. He got mad when I told him he got scammed by a Nigarian confidence scammer. The only proof that he has that this "woman" exist are pictures and texts. No video, no audio. A year later he is still waiting for his check, still thinks he has a girlfriend and believes that she is the victim of the Nigerian government because the president is too ill to sign anyone's paycheck.

      Question 1 to self, is it too good to be true? Question 2 to self, are you willing to do anything to make it true. If either or both answers are yes... well unfortunately too many people that answer yes don't really care to move onto the realization that unless you are born to wealth or something, good things come from equally hard work and some things you can't have no matter how hard you work.

    2. Re:Forget the prince... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only proof that he has that this "woman" exist are pictures and texts. No video, no audio. A year later he is still waiting for his check, still thinks he has a girlfriend and believes that she is the victim of the Nigerian government because the president is too ill to sign anyone's paycheck.

      Hey, almost half the world think there's a God because there's a 2000/1400 year old book about it. They don't even get pictures...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Forget the prince... by DoktorMidnight · · Score: 1

      Seriously? No way, no way that actually happened. That story is just all kinds of sad if it's true.

    4. Re:Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impossible! NPR did a piece on Nigeria many years ago explaining how they were cleaning up their act and fraud was on the way out. How is this possible? Did NPR lie to us?

    5. Re:Forget the prince... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Hey, almost half the world think there's a God because there's a 2000/1400 year old book about it. They don't even get pictures...

      You can get them with pictures these days!

      Plus, the stand-in pictures were "stained glass windows" in churches for centuries because the average person couldn't read the bible anyway.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Forget the prince... by naris · · Score: 2

      Did he vote for Trump?

    7. Re:Forget the prince... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      And the God's self-appointed representatives also want money. And tax breaks. What a coincidence!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he said that he's "with Her".

    9. Re: Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW,the oldest extant sacred text was written circa 10,000 BP.

    10. Re:Forget the prince... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Hey, Nigerian nurses are hot; I can understand the draw.

      He wired his entire savings of $5K on the promise that...

      Local gals ain't cheap either. The President can vouch for that.

    11. Re:Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the big bang happen? There are no records, no pictures, no videos, no texts of the event.

    12. Re:Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're trying to be funny, and God knows why this is marked Insightful instead, but you don't need religion to believe in God.

    13. Re: Forget the prince... by dfenstrate · · Score: 0

      The existence of life (or even the universe itself) is the only testament you need to be sure God exists. There is absolutely zero chance that life formed anywhere in the universe without intelligent intervention.
      Amino acids can form spontaneously under the right conditions. The probability of those amino acids randomly assembling into a simple useful protein, given all the time since the big bang, is less likely than picking one marked atom from all the atoms in the universe. The chance that sufficient useful proteins would randomly assemble at the same place and time in such a fashion as to start the most basic life form is so unfathomably remote as to be fairly called impossible.
      Of course, various theories have been posited to get around these problems, but none have a shred of evidence or analysis to support them. Their only claim to validity is that atheists want them to be true. I don't have enough faith to accept that the first life in the universe could have been started by anything other than an intelligence that proceeded all life.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    14. Re: Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    15. Re: Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is absolutely zero chance that life formed anywhere in the universe without intelligent intervention.
      ...

      The probability of those amino acids randomly assembling into a simple useful protein, given all the time since the big bang, is less likely than picking one marked atom from all the atoms in the universe. The chance that sufficient useful proteins would randomly assemble at the same place and time in such a fashion as to start the most basic life form is so unfathomably remote as to be fairly called impossible.

      How did you determine this? If you have figured out a way to figure that out, you are the very first person ever to get it right. In fact, if you have done this, you are definitely and unambiguously the smartest person in human history and you are about to the the number one very biggest person in the news. A million dollar Nobel prize is just another meaningless trophy to you. All you have to do, is explain your reasoning and if it makes sense, you have solved the hardest problem ever. (The most amazing thing about this, is that you don't even need to be perfectly right -- your explanation simply needs to make sense and be supported by evidence. People can fine-tune it later. It's that first step, though, which is the biggest.)

      In all other peoples' experience (yours is the exception; your totally unique experiences are probably what gave you the insight that everyone else has missed), the probability of amino acids assembling into useful proteins is reasonable likely. People have seen mechanical processes sort things all their lives (e.g. any beach). Your idea, though groundbreaking and about to bring you great fame, is contrary to everyone else's observations and experience. Don't be surprised if people don't believe you at first, but as soon as you put forth your explanation (which you haven't done yet), I'm sure that's going to change.

      Of course, various theories have been posited to get around these problems

      What problems?

      My guess is that you meant to say that various hypothesis have been put forth, to explain how life may have started. You're right. Many have. I even heard some people say Ymir, "elder things", Quetzalcoatl, Jehova, Brahma or some other just sort of spontaneously came into existence (just as hard as the universe creating itself) and did it. Of course, many of the hypotheses are unsupported and not very serious. Some are better than others. None have been confirmed, yet.

      Their only claim to validity is that atheists want them to be true.

      No, each hypothesis stands (or falls) on its own merits. Nobody gives a fuck what atheists think.

      Probably the "best" one right now (excluding your new hypothesis that you're about to reveal though your probability analysis; I agree that one is about to become the new "best") involves lightning and amino acids, simply because it might be possible to recreate. (Whereas many of the others aren't confirmable or falsifiable, or at least nobody has figured out how, yet.) Recreating it wouldn't confirm that it happened but would confirm that the hypothesis is consistent with nature. So far, none of the mystical explanations is up to that level, yet. (But I realize you're about to change that, as soon as you really show us something.)

      I don't have enough faith to accept that the first life in the universe could have been started by anything other than an intelligence that proceeded all life

      Actually, you do. The intelligence-came-before-life hypothesis is the most far-fetched and least supported of them all and defies your enitre lifetime of observation and experience, so it requires the most faith. It's fortunate that you had this faith, since it's what let you stay open to the seemingly-crazy idea. And that's what led you you finally doing what nobody else suc

    16. Re: Forget the prince... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Epic smackdown!

    17. Re: Forget the prince... by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      In all other peoples' experience (yours is the exception; your totally unique experiences are probably what gave you the insight that everyone else has missed), the probability of amino acids assembling into useful proteins is reasonable likely. People have seen mechanical processes sort things all their lives (e.g. any beach). Your idea, though groundbreaking and about to bring you great fame, is contrary to everyone else's observations and experience.

      It's funny, you talk about science and observation but mostly you resort to mockery. Surely, then, you can point to some actual study that supports your position that the start of life is reasonably probable as a random event? As you imply, people have been investigating this sort of thing; if someone could mathematically prove that the spontaneous generation of life was probable; surely wouldn't that be Nobel-level material you could immediately point to and show what a fool I am?

      The simplest life has some 500,000 base pairs of DNA; perhaps 525 genes. The odds that a chain this long will arise with minimal error is rather small all by itself. Further, In order for these to be expressed into a functioning life, numerous proteins and organelles have to be at work already; but how do you get them started from random bits, even in the most fortuitous of circumstances? There's no non-intelligent mechanism where parts of a useful assembly might be preserved until the remaining bits come along and make it useful; it is likely to degrade back into it's chemical parts before too long. You need countless parts working together at the same time to kick start the entire affair. There's no partial credit! You can't point to evolution when there's no life! (Hey, maybe you can prove me wrong here! How could parts of potential life be preserved until the rest of the bits come along and something manages to kick start it into a living state? ) Even the simplest life is irreducibly complex; take away a vital functioning bit on the cellular level; and it's dead; no chemical happenstance will bring it back to life.

      If you're talking about making analogies based on our experience, the specified functional complexity of life only has analogies in human activities, not natural activities. Natural activities will get you crystals, stalactites, canyons, winding rivers, sort some rocks on the beach, push up mountains, etc; nature will never yield a mountain side with four rock formations that look like former presidents of the United States. Design is the best explanation of Mt. Rushmore, and design is the best explanation of life.

      It's funny, even a nasty, snarky man like Richard Dawkins is forced to admit the following "“Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose”... of course, he then spends the rest of the book saying 'Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes'? (He goes on to state there can be no designer because then "who designed the designer?." however, this is not the original question, but a new question. It's like a child who continues to ask 'Why'? every time an answer is given.)

      (Yes, I read the rest of your comment; mostly mockery; little to actually address.)

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  7. mastered... by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    ...mastered the creation of compelling and credible-looking fraud emails.

    Really? Because I've never seen one that couldn't immediately be pegged as a 419 scam. The stilted and over formal English is one clue, the almost constant use of a first name for both first and last names ("Dr Thomas James") and the use of impressive titles for people who are in a mundane job (Rev Dr [guy who distributes checks]) are indications.

    And, of course, the need for a small payment, regardless of how large and official the organization and sum being discussed may happen to be.

    You'd think the UN could deduct the $50 for the courier if they're sending you a check for $27,500,000 US dollars ONLY*. // this offer is legal and entirely legitimate

    1. Re:mastered... by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      $50 for the courier if they're sending you a check for $27,500,000 US dollars ONLY*. // this offer is legal and entirely legitimate

      I'm convinced! Where do I send the check?!

    2. Re:mastered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read somewhere that the obvious flags are intentional to weed out smart people, so they just delete the email instantly rather than waste everyone's time responding to people who figure it out and cause trouble.

  8. The Success of the Nigerian Scam by SenseiTim · · Score: 2

    The success of the Nigerian Scam is a testament to the stupidity of the average user. Anybody who would actually send money to a self-claimed royal personage in a random email deserves to get clipped, IMHO! It obviously doesn't take a genius to set up a free email account. . .

    1. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is an old con artist trick that easily predates the Internet. Someone approaches you with a "winning" lotto ticket. They say they can't claim the prize themselves because they owe the government money. If you'd pay their fines they could claim the prize and they are willing to offer you a substantial share in return.

      This is retold in various ways, like they have a winning stub for a race horse. But the winnings are too large to pay in cash and the race track requires a wire transfer. But the con will ask for some money to open a bank account. Then this can easily go to where he convinces you that the winnings should go into your bank account, but he says he doesn't want to get ripped off so maybe you should pay him some of it first just prove that you're honest. Like maybe $200. (or whatever is the typical maximum you can pull from an ATM at once)

      That people can do this anonymously and over the internet makes it far more scaleable of a con. But it's a very old con. The Internet just makes everything BETTER.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Things haven't changed much. If you search ancient papyri, I bet there's one from a Hittite prince kidnapped by Mittanian pirates who beseeches help from a kind Egyptian noble such as you who could help pay the ransom and then be handsomely rewarded -- just use this new money transfer service those Phoenician devils invented.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with these scams is that more frequently than stupid people, the desperate are the most likely to fall for them. Now, there may be a link between desperate and stupid, but it's always important to remember that the people who get hurt by these aren't fat cats with tons of money sitting around, it's people who don't know how they're going to put food on their table tomorrow desperate for a way out.

    4. Re: The Success of the Nigerian Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This type of scam is more generally known as an advance fee scam. Older variations include the Spanish prisoner scam. Typically involving a Spanish nobleman imprisoned somewhere. His captors don't realize how wealthy he is, or they would extract a huge ransom. If you van just pay to get him released, he will repay your kindness with a massive sum. In fact, he will be so grateful that you will even be given his beautiful young daughters hand in marriage. The ransom starts off reasonable, but the kidnappers increase it after you pay, if you finally pay enough for him to be released, he needs money for passage and food and board until he can arrive home. If you're then done and won't pay anymore and demand that he finds his own way home, then that's fine, but his daughter is eager to meet you and get married right away... she needs some money for the trip to meet you though, ad some money for a dress, maybe a sum to pay off another suitor to drop his claim...
      Variants of this scam have been destroying people''s lives for centuries, at least.

    5. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by arth1 · · Score: 1

      These scams don't primarily target the desperate, but the greedy.
      Some people are both, but rich greedy folks fall for scams all the time.

    6. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by slew · · Score: 2

      con is of course short for confidence...

      There will always people trying to gain your confidence...

    7. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The success of the Nigerian Scam is a testament to the stupidity of the average user.

      Does the average user fall for it?

      It think it's a testament to the vastly-dumber-than-average user. A 80 IQ person is going to laugh it off pretty easily.

    8. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 0

      con is of course short for confidence...

      There will always people trying to gain your confidence...

      Winning the American Presidency wasn't listed?

  9. Easy peasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest problem for me is, I am an actual Nigerian Prince... nobody believes me thanks to these crooks. Any tips?

    Pretend to be a 419 scammer, and ask people to be a part of the scam. Send them this article as proof of this being a sure revenue stream. They'll jump at the opportunity and then you can easily convince them to help you transfer your money.

  10. FBI should start sending out ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The FBI should start sending out fake Nigerian spam, then sending anyone who responds an automated warning that "if this were a real scam, you'd be broke soon." Call it a mass education campaign.

    1. Re:FBI should start sending out ... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      The FBI should start sending out fake Nigerian spam, then sending anyone who responds an automated warning that "if this were a real scam, you'd be broke soon." Call it a mass education campaign.

      Bah, the FBI, always trying to keep me from my rightful millions!

  11. Now on Facebook too! by yorgasor · · Score: 1

    Just today I got a messenger request from someone in Nigeria. I looked at their profile, and they had all sorts of checkins at glorious sounding hotels and places with the word 'palace' in them. I just marked them as spam, but I'm sure if I let them talk to me, the scam would have started immediately.

    --
    Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
  12. The adage still holds by ColdBoot · · Score: 1

    A fool and his money are soon parted

  13. Actually, no... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    RTFA. This is not the old "I be having footlocker full of money I'll send you, merely needing $USD1000 shipping and customs" scam.

    This is (if you're the controller of company.com)

    From: Real CEO Name <real-ceo-userid@cornpany.com>
    To: Your name <you@company.com>

    Hey, (your name) this is is (CEO's name), there's a account payable that got missed somehow. This has to go out today.
    (payment details)

    If you're not paying very close attention, cornpany.com looks very much like company.com.

    This is absolutely rampant. I hadn't seen that it was the Nigerian mob doing this, but I'm not surprised. They've definitely upped their grasp of English; these are not at all in "419-speak". That lends credence to the theory that the fractured English of the classic "Nigerian Prince scam" was deliberate, to filter out the less gullible.

    1. Re:Actually, no... by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no.

      PO number and invoice number, please, boss. And I've checked the system and there are no outstanding invoices from [companyname].

      Has to go out today? To an account we don't have in our system? How come?

      All you need are some very basic processes to keep this from working.

    2. Re:Actually, no... by XXongo · · Score: 2

      Yeah, no.

      PO number and invoice number, please, boss. And I've checked the system and there are no outstanding invoices from [companyname].

      If you read the article, you'll see that one of their techniques is to watch your inbox for a legitimate invoice, then change the payment information on that invoice to their bank.

      So, yes, there will be a PO number and an invoice number.

    3. Re:Actually, no... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > That lends credence to the theory that the fractured English of the classic "Nigerian Prince scam" was deliberate, to filter out the less gullible.

      Agreed. I think that about half a decade of that would have filtered out the poor English and obvious scammy nature of that stuff if it wasn't actually the correct way for them to filter out non-rubes quickly. Because of the nature of email (reasonably anonymous, inability to view who others have emailed, inability to contact other potential dupes- none of which would apply to a man scamming on the streets), it's really really plausible that this is the case.

    4. Re:Actually, no... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      True. Proper procedures will prevent most of this kind of thing. But in too many companies, urgent email from the CEO gets less scrutiny that it ought to. The scammer is addressing the target by name. Often, the first email is just a "Hey, Bob, are you in the office right now?" ping.

      The nastier ones are the ones like XXongo referred to, where they watch your inbox, or have infected your PC with malware that echoes all your mail to them. (I've seen both.) They just wait until there's a conversation about a lot of money about to change hands. Then they insert a reply, quoting all the legitimate conversation up to that point, with "We just had an issue with our bank and had to change accounts, please send the payment to ..." with a different bank. People buying a house have had their escrow payment snatched in this way.

      The first of these, a few years ago, the bank was something suspicious offshore. Now, it's an American bank with an American-sounding name as the owner. This is generally some poor schlub who answered one of those "We are looking to hire someone as a part-time financial agent ..." spams. The ignorant money mule thinks they have a legitimate job, until the FBI comes knocking on their door. All they knew was that money comes in, they transfer it to their "employer", minus their commission. Then, surprise, they're on the hook for all the money that flowed through their bank account off to Bank of Lagos.

    5. Re:Actually, no... by slew · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no.

      PO number and invoice number, please, boss. And I've checked the system and there are no outstanding invoices from [companyname].

      If you read the article, you'll see that one of their techniques is to watch your inbox for a legitimate invoice, then change the payment information on that invoice to their bank.

      So, yes, there will be a PO number and an invoice number.

      Who sends a check these days or makes payments to a payee account number that isn't on their on-line payments list?

      One would think there be a reasonable process for vetting new account numbers for existing payees to their on-line payment list. It used to take an act of god to add/edit a new payee account in most accounts payable departments of medium sized companies (because of people using this path to embezzle money from companies), but I suppose many companies these days don't even have accounts payable departments and have some poorly trained person to do this job on the side because they don't understand the consequences of not having "internal controls".

    6. Re:Actually, no... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This happened in my company. Accountant had their hand over the transfer button before it was judged to be a scam.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  14. But why Nigeria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely other countries have spammers too?

    1. Re:But why Nigeria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They do. Ghana has actually mixed online scamming with witchcraft, they call it Sakawa.

    2. Re:But why Nigeria? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Surely other countries have spammers too?

      Only the first level of scammer is typically in Nigeria. They are the ones who mass send out the e-mails and harvest e-mails from online mailing lists, etc. Once they catch a potential target they pass the account off to someone typically who has a little better English, and frequently living in Europe. They work in teams (if you pay attention, you can catch their e-mail address changing sometime- this is when you're getting passed off to one of the better informed scammers).

      There was a big hub of activity out of Amsterdam at one point for the higher level scammers. I'm not sure where they are located nowadays, but Amsterdam was a hub for the higher level scammers back when I followed this 15 years ago.

      As for why Nigeria, it was popularized, one person had success and friends found out- and it spread. They also have very little enforcement to prevent people scamming. They have relatively large number of internet cafes (or had... nowadays I'm sure they have cell-phones so could do this from anywhere).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:But why Nigeria? by slew · · Score: 1

      Sadly, multi-level marketing and lead trafficking is an un-stopable business endeavor...

      Even for semi-legit organizations, say if you donate money to some non-profit. Non-profits often outsource fundraising. If you decide to donate to one non-profit, the fund raising company might actually sell the fact that you donated up the food chain to another larger organization so they can attempt to solicit money from you. This information is a called a "lead" and there are whole businesses built upon selling lead information. The money they make from selling the leads can help to subsidize their business (in addition to the money they skim of the donations). However, once again, you are the product in this scenario, they are selling information about you to who knows who. If you donate to non profits, at a minimum you should look at their donor privacy policy, but realize they often sub-contract their work.

      As a more industrial example, basically google adwords is a gigantic lead generating framework which companies dump big money into...

      When you look at things from the perspective of business, these low-level scammers are simply generating leads for the high-level scammers...

  15. How does this work? by chthon · · Score: 1

    Because there are many people who are more greedy than smart.

  16. Human nature by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as people get older their brains go. Not always, but there's plenty enough that do. A lot of these people have money from retirement earned before their minds went. The only thing you can do (besides curing age related cognitive decline) is try and keep the scammers away from them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Human nature by rojash · · Score: 0

      fuck FF.

    2. Re: Human nature by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      We could also prevent them from voting.

    3. Re: Human nature by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This logic would have to follow. Down the rabbit hole we go.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    4. Re:Human nature by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      What did the foo fighters ever do to you?
      or are you talking about the Fantastic Four?

  17. Nigerian Astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Antron Argaiv,

    I am Dr. Bakare Tunde, the cousin of Nigerian Astronaut, Air Force Major Abacha Tunde.
    He was the first African in space when he made a secret flight to the Salyut 6 space station in 1979. He was on a later Soviet spaceflight, Soyuz T-16Z to the secret Soviet military space station Salyut 8T in 1989.
    He was stranded there in 1990 when the Soviet Union was dissolved. His other Soviet crew members returned to earth on the Soyuz T-16Z, but his place was taken up by return cargo.
    He is in good humor, but wants to come home.

    In the 28-years since he has been on the station, he has accumulated flight pay and interest amounting to almost $15,000,000 American Dollars. This is held in a trust at the Lagos National Savings and Trust Association. If we can obtain access to this money, we can place a down payment with the Russian Space Authorities for a Soyuz return flight to bring him back to Earth. I am told this will cost $3,000,000 American Dollars. In order to access the his trust fund we need your assistance.

    Consequently, my colleagues and I are willing to transfer the total amount to your account or subsequent disbursement, since we as civil servants are prohibited by the Code of Conduct Bureau from opening or operating foreign accounts in our names.

    Needless to say, the trust reposed on you at this juncture is enormous. In return, we have agreed to offer you 20 percent of the transferred sum, while 10 percent shall be set aside for incidental expenses between the parties in the course of the transaction. You will be mandated to remit the balance 70 percent to other accounts in due course.

  18. More blue hairs, bud by rojash · · Score: 1

    There are more old widows that can afford this shit, and are gullible too

  19. You know what they say? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't an effective way to con people out of money, it would not have been around for as long as it has and it's been around since the advent of the fax machine. I remember my dad getting these random faxes at work with the same old song and dance, Nigerian up front fee scams.

  20. not sure if it's nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    recently I received

    "Hello!

    Do not consider on my illiteracy, I am foreign.We uploaded mine malicious program onto your OS.After that I stole all privy information from your system. Furthermore I had some more compromising.The most entertaining evidence which I thieftend- its a videotape with your self-abusing.I installed virus on a porn site and after you installed it. When you chose the video and pressed play button, my deleterious soft immediately downloaded on your system.

    After loading, your web camera made the video with you wanking, furthermore it captured exactly the porn video you wanked on. In next few days my virus captured all your social and work contacts.

    If you want to erase all the evidence- pay me 760 euro in BTC(cryptocurrency).
    It is my Bitcoin wallet address - foobarbas

    You have 20 hours since now. If I see transfer I will eliminate the evidence permanently. Differently I will forward the record to all your friends."

    1. Re:not sure if it's nigerian by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I've received the same scam, almost word-for-word. If I were to respond, I'd be asking the sender how he managed to install his Windows-specific malware on my Linux box and get it to bypass my firewall. Of course, that would just verify my email address, so I just nuked it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  21. You think it's bad now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait till the first off-world colonies are established on Mars.

    Come to think of it, wasn't the first ever arrival a dummy?

  22. This is an old problem of the modern era by DoktorMidnight · · Score: 1

    As it was long said and attributed (with questionable veracity) to PT Barnum: "There's a sucker born every minute." The problem is that increasing technological sophistication and socio-economic complexity have forced us to recalculate the sucker creation rate to something like one sucker generated every 10.5 seconds. Give or take a second due to server load balance issues.

  23. Billing scam, not Nigerian scam at all by XXongo · · Score: 1
    Right. This is not the classic "Nigerian Scam".

    What is described here is an invoice scam (or "billing scam").
    https://www.scamwatch.gov.au/types-of-scams/buying-or-selling/false-billing
    https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/fraud-az-invoice-scams
    https://www.ag.state.mn.us/consumer/Publications/FakeInvoices.asp
    https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2018/02/phishers-send-fake-invoices

  24. Lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    karma.

  25. So... about 13 people then by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

    also known as 419 fraud, still ensnares a ton of people

    So... about 13 people then.

    1. Re:So... about 13 people then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if your average person weighs 153.8 lbs...

    2. Re:So... about 13 people then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you?? Here in the good ole US of A the average male weighs almost 200 pounds.

    3. Re:So... about 13 people then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a ton of people

      16 Europeans, 13 Americans, or 5 Nigerian Women.

  26. Follow the yellow brick road... by Julz · · Score: 1

    Only problem is that, it's green ($$$) and muddy (like their heads). People are getting more greedy and stupid to boot.

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  27. Good news by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny

    If an actual Nigerian prince ever gets into a pickle and needs some assistance from strangers, it's good to know that the general public hasn't yet become too jaded to help, and he still has some hope.

  28. the annual conference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.stearns.org/fun/nigerian-email-conference.htm

  29. Rescam could solve this epidemia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually browse through my spam folder once per month and pick obivious scam emails. Then I forward those to AI bot at https://www.rescam.org/
    This AI bot is quite beautiful way to eat up scammers time to milk real ppl.

  30. Hmm... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    Lemme tell you, one day some African noble who will actually have millions in off-shore accounts and only needs $100 to unlock them will try to find people online to help him out and nobody will take him seriously /s There is no patch for stupidity.

  31. Location confusion by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There is probably lots of confusion between someone claiming to be from Nigeria versus scams actually happening in Nigeria, and vice versa. If I were a Nigerian scammer I would not claim to be in Nigeria because of the country's spamming stigma. For anything mailed, I'd get a buddy in another country to help.

  32. I get these a lot by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I've had the same email address since the early nineties, back when we didn't see the harm in having our email addresses in plaintext on Usenet (boy does that sound dumb now) and even despite spam filters I have to wade through junk mail on a daily basis.

    Every so often I browse through the email caught by my spam filter, on the off chance that I am missing something important. (I have a photography business and get job offers through email.) The Nigerian Prince, God Fearing Mom, Crooked General, Post Office Worker and the like are pretty common, and if I run across a scam I hadn't heard of before, I'll read through it so I know how to warn friends and family.

    The thing is, even the best of them are really poorly written. Syntax is off, language is stilted, word choice is poor -- there's still a lot of indications that these things are written by people with not a lot of education. (So much so that they can be an entertaining read for certain values of humor.)

    These things are easy to spot, and have been in the news for, like, ever. Why are people still falling for them? Do victims lack the sophistication to recognize badly written and totally implausible scams?

    The snarky part of me wants to add "I blame public schools".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  33. Michael Gary Scott by johnsnails · · Score: 1
  34. Re:Those shifty Negroes. by fisted · · Score: 1

    I actually laughed out loud when I read

    groups of fraudsters in Nigeria continue to make millions off of these classic cons.

    because it's too adorable that whoever wrote that thinks you actually have to be in Nigeria to pull off the Nigerian prince scam...

  35. They wouldn't understand by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    these emails are going after people with borderline dementia (or full blown dementia). The reason the instances are ticking up is the boomers are getting older and their brains are going before their bodies. Science can keep their hearts from failing but it can't yet fix the brain.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They wouldn't understand by mentil · · Score: 1

      So the money spent on fighting confidence scams should instead be spent on curing dementia? I'm cool with that.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  36. Nigirian Scams bah - charities are the worst by msevior · · Score: 1

    My 87 year old mother keeps sending "Legitimate" Charities more money than she can really afford after they send her sob story emails. Because she has a record of supporting them in the past they won't let go. I'll never support a mainstream charity with an email operation again.

    1. Re:Nigirian Scams bah - charities are the worst by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      The phone operations are probably more effective.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  37. The '419' Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call it by it's proper name if you're going to call it out.

    It's a clever con I'll give them that.

  38. I used to collect these scam emails ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I used to collect these scam emails on my web site.

    Every week or two, I will get an email asking if such and such email is true, or asking to verify a winning ticket, or contacting the Sultan of Brunei for charity or a project, ...etc..

    The sad thing is that while some of these emails are from the USA and other developed countries, the vast majority are from desperate people in poor countries. Some of them already paid the scammers and believe the documents provided by them, such as lawyer and bank certificates with official stamps on them.

  39. Nigerian Prince by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I figured the whole "Nigerian Prince" thing was a lie.

    Never guessed it was actually half accurate (the Nigerian part).

  40. ML/AI by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Are they using ML/AI technologies to identify their victims?