Slashdot Mirror


Nigerian Email Scammers Are More Effective Than Ever (wired.com)

You would think that after decades of analyzing and fighting email spam, there'd be a fix by now for the internet's oldest hustle -- the Nigerian Prince scam. But the problem, a new report suggests, has only grown to become more widespread and sophisticated. From the report: There's generally more awareness that a West African noble demanding $1,000 in order to send you millions is a scam, but the underlying logic of these "pay a little, get a lot" schemes, also known as 419 fraud, still ensnares a ton of people. In fact, groups of fraudsters in Nigeria continue to make millions off of these classic cons. And they haven't just refined the techniques and expanded their targets -- they've gained minor celebrity status for doing it.

On Thursday, the security firm Crowdstrike published detailed findings on Nigerian confraternities, cultish gangs that engage in various criminal activities and have steadily evolved email fraud into a reliable cash cow. The groups, like the notorious Black Axe syndicate, have mastered the creation of compelling and credible-looking fraud emails. Crowdstrike notes that the groups aren't very regimented or technically sophisticated, but flexibility and camaraderie still allow them to develop powerful scams.

88 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. It is a form of taxation. by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, by this point, after decades of reports on it, I wouldn't call it "fraud" exactly, more like some sort of tax... Idiot tax? Greed tax? Take your pick.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:It is a form of taxation. by mark-t · · Score: 2

      No, that's lotteries.

    2. Re:It is a form of taxation. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to TFA, these guys are stepping up their game though. They use phishing techniques, get company servers infected with some commodity malware that lets them snoop around, then they can spear-phish using intraoffice email. If you have access to someone's inbox and a rough idea about the company's inner workings, it's not at all hard to impersonate that person convincingly. Perhaps enough to re-route some cash or get some account numbers changed. Or - especially in smaller companies - they simply intercept emails with payment details and change the data.

      Scams like those might be prevented with proper security and procedures, but they are way outside the realm of simple idiocy.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:It is a form of taxation. by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Funny

      The biggest problem for me is, I am an actual Nigerian Prince and I want to transfer several million out of the country, but I can't find anyone to take it because of all these fraudsters. All I want is for someone to send me $1000, and I'll send them 100 million of which they can keep 10%. But nobody believes me thanks to these crooks. Any tips?

    4. Re:It is a form of taxation. by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      If you go that direction, my vote would be for the P.T. Barnum tax.

    5. Re:It is a form of taxation. by bobbied · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, send me the 100 Million as an electronic money transfer to the brokerage account I just opened for you, keeping $2000 in cash for yourself...To make the accounting easy, I've left it with a zero balance for now. I suggest you not use Western Union, but approach the bank where your money is on deposit, I'm sure if you really have that much on deposit, they can easily direct you into the proper way to do this, just show up in person. No, I won't take a check, not even a cashiers check, only electronic money transfers.

      THEN, after I pay all the income taxes required by my country which takes at least a year, you are welcome to 90% of what's left.... Just show up at my door and provide proof that it's you. My address? Why yes, it's 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, come armed and tell the guards you won't take no as an answer and you don't need an appointment, they will take care of you.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you have access to someone's inbox and a rough idea about the company's inner workings, it's not at all hard to impersonate that person convincingly.

      Dearest Robert M. Jones in Engineering,

      We are Sally from Accounting! It is with great mercy and humble that we hereby implore for the urgent help with a great matter. It is our uncle the dearest Reverend Robert Snabo from Customer Support who did thereby become gravely ill with the gall cancer, and we must remit a sum of $1,000,000 for his immediate curation. Due to the terrible situation here in Accounting, we would pleased to send you a cheque for the sum of $1,050,000, with the balance $50,000 Yours to keep if you will help us here in Accounting by cashing this cheque and forwarding the remainder sum of $1,000,000 to our agent who will henceby contact You.

      We in Accounting are deeply religious and we know that You are an honourable person humble with God and that you may will help the dearest Reverend Robert Snabo of Customer Support with his cancer treatments.

      Dearest blessings upon your family and may the Creator be with us in our time of great need, here in Accounting.

      Yours in deepest condolence, Sally Jessica Green, Accounting.

    7. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fool and his money....

      I worked at a place as email admin. a few years ago. I pulled a email out of the spam pile for a user. It was a exchange between them and a Nigerian scammer. The user was a old guy in his 80's and had sending money to these scammers for years, and still expecting to get millions some time down the road.

      The CEO told me to dig in to his account and found out how much he had sent. Turns out he had sent them his grand kids college money, mortgaged his house, his wife had divorced him, and his whole life was basically be soaked up by this scam.

      I was ordered to block all contact with him and he scammer, which I happily did. Some higher ups got involved. The old fool got his lawyer involved and in the end I was instructed to unblock his account and let him go on his merry way.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    8. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      God I wish hadn't spent all my mod points. That was good.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    9. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How exactly is the parent poster wrong? People spend millions every year on lotto tickets because they don't understand the most basic of financial calculations. The expected value of a risky asset, like a lottery ticket, is [(Present value of payout x Odds of payout) - Cost]. If that is negative, it's a bad deal, and like most forms of gambling lotto tickets are almost always negative, and therefore a poor investment. Still, so people hold on to the 'can't win if you don't play' mindset, and all but a very lucky few and worse off for it. Basic financial/statistical literacy says it is a poor call. Pointing that out isn't 'edgy,' it is math.

    10. Re:It is a form of taxation. by arth1 · · Score: 2

      If a return was the only point of gambling, you'd be correct.
      However, people pay for the thrill of gambling.

      You lose money if you go on a rollercoaster ride too, but still some people do it, for the thrill. Others find it a waste of money, but who are they to judge how others choose to spend theirs?

    11. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      If that is negative, it's a bad deal, and like most forms of gambling lotto tickets are almost always negative, and therefore a poor investment.

      While you are not entirely wrong, that is the position of someone who is financially OK.

      If you are poor, with poor prospects, then the negative amount is the cost of buying a chance of getting out of the mess.

      If you buy a lottery ticket for $1, then the impact on your life of losing that $1 is not great. You probably spend a lot of other dollars on uselessness - in fact a dollar spent on alcohol will likely likely do you more harm than if you spent it on the lottery. However, If you win, even $5, you are better off, at least for your next 5 bets, and if you win big, the rest of your life does not suck. Think about it - if your life sucks, how many weeks would you NOT spend $1 because MAYBE the rest of your life won't suck?

      Really, if you are dirt poor, spending $1 on the lottery is a great investment. Spending $2? not so much.

      Honest, real maths and psychology professors made this assessment, not me. Obviously, saving your dollars for a couple of years and buying shares with the $100 instead of buying lottery tickets MIGHT be a better investment, but then again, maybe the shares are in Enron or something run by the next Madoff.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    12. Re:It is a form of taxation. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      No state has higher fraud than Florida. Real slime balls out there taking advantage of the elderly. And you know what, it PAYS BIG TIME!!!....right up until the fuckers get thrown in the slammer. But for everyone they put away, X amount more engage in this.

      Oh, and the baby boomers haven't peaked in retirement. They're just waiting for the massive FL influx to pounce.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    13. Re:It is a form of taxation. by DonkeyG5 · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between people who play lottery thinking that they are going to win and it's going to fix their lives and those who play it just for fun.

    14. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      While doing that same email gig I got a email from some Nigerian scammer about the millions that awaited me if I would just help a fellow out. I responded that I was the grand negas and how dare he waste my time with his pathetic scam. As punishment I had used my awesome magical powers to succor his soul. Unless he showed up at my door with the "funds" his email promised me in hand I would be forced to sell his soul to a demon to recoup my costs.

      While I never expected a reply or anything to come of this but a chuckle on my part. I did briefly wonder what I would do if some poor fucker showed up on my doorstep with a foot locker full of cash looking to buy his soul.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    15. Re:It is a form of taxation. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Think about it - if your life sucks, how many weeks would you NOT spend $1 because MAYBE the rest of your life won't suck?

      Why spend a dollar on a *remote* chance that it might result in improvement when that dollar can still do some actual good now?

      And I'm speaking as one whose life did actually suck (at least relative to what I could see around me) for a good portion of his adult life. Back then, while the money that I could have spent on lottery tickets wouldn't have actually hurt that much to lose, in the end it was far better spent on things like bus fare, buying an extra couple of loaves of bread or other similar aspects of survival.

    16. Re:It is a form of taxation. by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Just for fun? Throwing money away willfully, is fun? BS. They think that they may reasonably win. They have no clue that their chances are negligible.

    17. Re:It is a form of taxation. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That, or he comes looking for said cash he comes looking for said cash!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re:It is a form of taxation. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I could see that as a problem.....

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    19. Re:It is a form of taxation. by HyperQuantum · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should look into Bitcoin.

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    20. Re:It is a form of taxation. by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, with easy access to credit being the norm in Western countries (even for individuals with bad credit scores) the rest of us are paying for the debts the idiots of society rack up (by falling victims to Nigerian scams and/or buying vehicles and electronics they can't afford) by a process known as bank bailouts. Please note I do not include in this people who acquired debt via medical expenses or other misfortune.

    21. Re:It is a form of taxation. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Just for fun? Throwing money away willfully, is fun? BS. They think that they may reasonably win. They have no clue that their chances are negligible.

      You don't seem to know much about human nature. Most people buying lottery tickets are fully aware than their chance of winning is negligible. They don't do it to "win".

      When there is an office lottery pool, I will chip in and participate just because it is the social thing to do.

    22. Re:It is a form of taxation. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      if you win big, the rest of your life does not suck.

      This is incorrect. For most lottery winners, their life temporarily sucks less, but they soon fall back below even their pre-win level of suckage. They usually squander their winnings, but often take on debt that they can't afford once the money is gone.

    23. Re:It is a form of taxation. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's Sally.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    24. Re:It is a form of taxation. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I think they have moved away from the Nigerian prince. Bill Gates tried to give me money last week but I told him to fuck off.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    25. Re:It is a form of taxation. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It's not that one may think they may reasonably win as much as they think that the chance of winning is still not zero.

      They may realize their chances are negligible, but play anyways because they figure that the cost of buying the number of tiickets that they do is not any more significant to them.

    26. Re:It is a form of taxation. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You must be fun at a party:
      You know what, I play the lottery. Two dollars every time it gets high. My odds of winning? Effectively zero. But you know what, that two bucks gives me a little bit of mental gymnastics to play with on what I might do if I won. Which I know I won't.
      Do I buy ten, twenty, fifty? No. I buy one.

    27. Re:It is a form of taxation. by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Guess you missed the post about people who buy thrills with roller-coasters rather than lottery tickets. Or maybe you just didn't understand it.

      Either way, I'm not going to explain it.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. Wrong header by Teun · · Score: 1

    Wrong header
    It should read: Ever more stupid and greedy people online.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Wrong header by magarity · · Score: 2

      Wrong header

      It should read: Ever more stupid and greedy people online.

      Paying well-forged invoices is neither stupid nor greedy.

  3. 419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

    1. Re:419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Isn't that what.... the Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

      Not really, I'm pretty sure the Clintons would have paid their debts to their friends and financiers if they had won, and everyone funneling money to a political family or candidate understands that there is a substantial risk of failure in a democracy. It's probably why the money needed to pay off Democrats and Republicans is so small, especially considering how mighty the USG actually is, compared with someone who wields more absolute power over a smaller area, such as seen in a monarchy, fascism, communist "utopia", or whatever else inevitably devolves into a totalitarian hellhole.

    2. Re:419 Scam? Isn't that what.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      The Clinton foundation was doing? Send us money now, for a big pay off once I'm in office!

      No, that would have been a sound investment.

      The actual scam from 2016 was: Send us money now, and we'll "drain the swamp"!

  4. Forget the prince... by The+Fat+Bastard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend fell hard for an American nurse he meet over the Internet who works for a hospital in Nigeria. This "relationship" went on for a whole year. When he lost his job and started having financial difficulties, I found out about his Internet girlfriend and started asking his questions. It was too late. He wired his entire savings of $5K on the promise that he would get back his money plus $10K to "hold" for her until she got back to the US. When the check didn't show up, the amount that he would hold gradually increased to $20K. He got mad when I told him he got scammed by a Nigarian confidence scammer. The only proof that he has that this "woman" exist are pictures and texts. No video, no audio. A year later he is still waiting for his check, still thinks he has a girlfriend and believes that she is the victim of the Nigerian government because the president is too ill to sign anyone's paycheck.

    1. Re:Forget the prince... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      A friend fell hard for an American nurse he meet over the Internet who works for a hospital in Nigeria. This "relationship" went on for a whole year. When he lost his job and started having financial difficulties, I found out about his Internet girlfriend and started asking his questions. It was too late. He wired his entire savings of $5K on the promise that he would get back his money plus $10K to "hold" for her until she got back to the US. When the check didn't show up, the amount that he would hold gradually increased to $20K. He got mad when I told him he got scammed by a Nigarian confidence scammer. The only proof that he has that this "woman" exist are pictures and texts. No video, no audio. A year later he is still waiting for his check, still thinks he has a girlfriend and believes that she is the victim of the Nigerian government because the president is too ill to sign anyone's paycheck.

      Question 1 to self, is it too good to be true? Question 2 to self, are you willing to do anything to make it true. If either or both answers are yes... well unfortunately too many people that answer yes don't really care to move onto the realization that unless you are born to wealth or something, good things come from equally hard work and some things you can't have no matter how hard you work.

    2. Re:Forget the prince... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only proof that he has that this "woman" exist are pictures and texts. No video, no audio. A year later he is still waiting for his check, still thinks he has a girlfriend and believes that she is the victim of the Nigerian government because the president is too ill to sign anyone's paycheck.

      Hey, almost half the world think there's a God because there's a 2000/1400 year old book about it. They don't even get pictures...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Forget the prince... by DoktorMidnight · · Score: 1

      Seriously? No way, no way that actually happened. That story is just all kinds of sad if it's true.

    4. Re:Forget the prince... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Hey, almost half the world think there's a God because there's a 2000/1400 year old book about it. They don't even get pictures...

      You can get them with pictures these days!

      Plus, the stand-in pictures were "stained glass windows" in churches for centuries because the average person couldn't read the bible anyway.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Forget the prince... by naris · · Score: 2

      Did he vote for Trump?

    6. Re:Forget the prince... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      And the God's self-appointed representatives also want money. And tax breaks. What a coincidence!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re:Forget the prince... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Hey, Nigerian nurses are hot; I can understand the draw.

      He wired his entire savings of $5K on the promise that...

      Local gals ain't cheap either. The President can vouch for that.

    8. Re: Forget the prince... by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      In all other peoples' experience (yours is the exception; your totally unique experiences are probably what gave you the insight that everyone else has missed), the probability of amino acids assembling into useful proteins is reasonable likely. People have seen mechanical processes sort things all their lives (e.g. any beach). Your idea, though groundbreaking and about to bring you great fame, is contrary to everyone else's observations and experience.

      It's funny, you talk about science and observation but mostly you resort to mockery. Surely, then, you can point to some actual study that supports your position that the start of life is reasonably probable as a random event? As you imply, people have been investigating this sort of thing; if someone could mathematically prove that the spontaneous generation of life was probable; surely wouldn't that be Nobel-level material you could immediately point to and show what a fool I am?

      The simplest life has some 500,000 base pairs of DNA; perhaps 525 genes. The odds that a chain this long will arise with minimal error is rather small all by itself. Further, In order for these to be expressed into a functioning life, numerous proteins and organelles have to be at work already; but how do you get them started from random bits, even in the most fortuitous of circumstances? There's no non-intelligent mechanism where parts of a useful assembly might be preserved until the remaining bits come along and make it useful; it is likely to degrade back into it's chemical parts before too long. You need countless parts working together at the same time to kick start the entire affair. There's no partial credit! You can't point to evolution when there's no life! (Hey, maybe you can prove me wrong here! How could parts of potential life be preserved until the rest of the bits come along and something manages to kick start it into a living state? ) Even the simplest life is irreducibly complex; take away a vital functioning bit on the cellular level; and it's dead; no chemical happenstance will bring it back to life.

      If you're talking about making analogies based on our experience, the specified functional complexity of life only has analogies in human activities, not natural activities. Natural activities will get you crystals, stalactites, canyons, winding rivers, sort some rocks on the beach, push up mountains, etc; nature will never yield a mountain side with four rock formations that look like former presidents of the United States. Design is the best explanation of Mt. Rushmore, and design is the best explanation of life.

      It's funny, even a nasty, snarky man like Richard Dawkins is forced to admit the following "“Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose”... of course, he then spends the rest of the book saying 'Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes'? (He goes on to state there can be no designer because then "who designed the designer?." however, this is not the original question, but a new question. It's like a child who continues to ask 'Why'? every time an answer is given.)

      (Yes, I read the rest of your comment; mostly mockery; little to actually address.)

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  5. mastered... by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    ...mastered the creation of compelling and credible-looking fraud emails.

    Really? Because I've never seen one that couldn't immediately be pegged as a 419 scam. The stilted and over formal English is one clue, the almost constant use of a first name for both first and last names ("Dr Thomas James") and the use of impressive titles for people who are in a mundane job (Rev Dr [guy who distributes checks]) are indications.

    And, of course, the need for a small payment, regardless of how large and official the organization and sum being discussed may happen to be.

    You'd think the UN could deduct the $50 for the courier if they're sending you a check for $27,500,000 US dollars ONLY*. // this offer is legal and entirely legitimate

    1. Re:mastered... by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      $50 for the courier if they're sending you a check for $27,500,000 US dollars ONLY*. // this offer is legal and entirely legitimate

      I'm convinced! Where do I send the check?!

  6. The Success of the Nigerian Scam by SenseiTim · · Score: 2

    The success of the Nigerian Scam is a testament to the stupidity of the average user. Anybody who would actually send money to a self-claimed royal personage in a random email deserves to get clipped, IMHO! It obviously doesn't take a genius to set up a free email account. . .

    1. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is an old con artist trick that easily predates the Internet. Someone approaches you with a "winning" lotto ticket. They say they can't claim the prize themselves because they owe the government money. If you'd pay their fines they could claim the prize and they are willing to offer you a substantial share in return.

      This is retold in various ways, like they have a winning stub for a race horse. But the winnings are too large to pay in cash and the race track requires a wire transfer. But the con will ask for some money to open a bank account. Then this can easily go to where he convinces you that the winnings should go into your bank account, but he says he doesn't want to get ripped off so maybe you should pay him some of it first just prove that you're honest. Like maybe $200. (or whatever is the typical maximum you can pull from an ATM at once)

      That people can do this anonymously and over the internet makes it far more scaleable of a con. But it's a very old con. The Internet just makes everything BETTER.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Things haven't changed much. If you search ancient papyri, I bet there's one from a Hittite prince kidnapped by Mittanian pirates who beseeches help from a kind Egyptian noble such as you who could help pay the ransom and then be handsomely rewarded -- just use this new money transfer service those Phoenician devils invented.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by arth1 · · Score: 1

      These scams don't primarily target the desperate, but the greedy.
      Some people are both, but rich greedy folks fall for scams all the time.

    4. Re:The Success of the Nigerian Scam by slew · · Score: 2

      con is of course short for confidence...

      There will always people trying to gain your confidence...

  7. FBI should start sending out ... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The FBI should start sending out fake Nigerian spam, then sending anyone who responds an automated warning that "if this were a real scam, you'd be broke soon." Call it a mass education campaign.

    1. Re:FBI should start sending out ... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      The FBI should start sending out fake Nigerian spam, then sending anyone who responds an automated warning that "if this were a real scam, you'd be broke soon." Call it a mass education campaign.

      Bah, the FBI, always trying to keep me from my rightful millions!

  8. Now on Facebook too! by yorgasor · · Score: 1

    Just today I got a messenger request from someone in Nigeria. I looked at their profile, and they had all sorts of checkins at glorious sounding hotels and places with the word 'palace' in them. I just marked them as spam, but I'm sure if I let them talk to me, the scam would have started immediately.

    --
    Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
  9. The adage still holds by ColdBoot · · Score: 1

    A fool and his money are soon parted

  10. Actually, no... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    RTFA. This is not the old "I be having footlocker full of money I'll send you, merely needing $USD1000 shipping and customs" scam.

    This is (if you're the controller of company.com)

    From: Real CEO Name <real-ceo-userid@cornpany.com>
    To: Your name <you@company.com>

    Hey, (your name) this is is (CEO's name), there's a account payable that got missed somehow. This has to go out today.
    (payment details)

    If you're not paying very close attention, cornpany.com looks very much like company.com.

    This is absolutely rampant. I hadn't seen that it was the Nigerian mob doing this, but I'm not surprised. They've definitely upped their grasp of English; these are not at all in "419-speak". That lends credence to the theory that the fractured English of the classic "Nigerian Prince scam" was deliberate, to filter out the less gullible.

    1. Re:Actually, no... by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no.

      PO number and invoice number, please, boss. And I've checked the system and there are no outstanding invoices from [companyname].

      Has to go out today? To an account we don't have in our system? How come?

      All you need are some very basic processes to keep this from working.

    2. Re:Actually, no... by XXongo · · Score: 2

      Yeah, no.

      PO number and invoice number, please, boss. And I've checked the system and there are no outstanding invoices from [companyname].

      If you read the article, you'll see that one of their techniques is to watch your inbox for a legitimate invoice, then change the payment information on that invoice to their bank.

      So, yes, there will be a PO number and an invoice number.

    3. Re:Actually, no... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > That lends credence to the theory that the fractured English of the classic "Nigerian Prince scam" was deliberate, to filter out the less gullible.

      Agreed. I think that about half a decade of that would have filtered out the poor English and obvious scammy nature of that stuff if it wasn't actually the correct way for them to filter out non-rubes quickly. Because of the nature of email (reasonably anonymous, inability to view who others have emailed, inability to contact other potential dupes- none of which would apply to a man scamming on the streets), it's really really plausible that this is the case.

    4. Re:Actually, no... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      True. Proper procedures will prevent most of this kind of thing. But in too many companies, urgent email from the CEO gets less scrutiny that it ought to. The scammer is addressing the target by name. Often, the first email is just a "Hey, Bob, are you in the office right now?" ping.

      The nastier ones are the ones like XXongo referred to, where they watch your inbox, or have infected your PC with malware that echoes all your mail to them. (I've seen both.) They just wait until there's a conversation about a lot of money about to change hands. Then they insert a reply, quoting all the legitimate conversation up to that point, with "We just had an issue with our bank and had to change accounts, please send the payment to ..." with a different bank. People buying a house have had their escrow payment snatched in this way.

      The first of these, a few years ago, the bank was something suspicious offshore. Now, it's an American bank with an American-sounding name as the owner. This is generally some poor schlub who answered one of those "We are looking to hire someone as a part-time financial agent ..." spams. The ignorant money mule thinks they have a legitimate job, until the FBI comes knocking on their door. All they knew was that money comes in, they transfer it to their "employer", minus their commission. Then, surprise, they're on the hook for all the money that flowed through their bank account off to Bank of Lagos.

    5. Re:Actually, no... by slew · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no.

      PO number and invoice number, please, boss. And I've checked the system and there are no outstanding invoices from [companyname].

      If you read the article, you'll see that one of their techniques is to watch your inbox for a legitimate invoice, then change the payment information on that invoice to their bank.

      So, yes, there will be a PO number and an invoice number.

      Who sends a check these days or makes payments to a payee account number that isn't on their on-line payments list?

      One would think there be a reasonable process for vetting new account numbers for existing payees to their on-line payment list. It used to take an act of god to add/edit a new payee account in most accounts payable departments of medium sized companies (because of people using this path to embezzle money from companies), but I suppose many companies these days don't even have accounts payable departments and have some poorly trained person to do this job on the side because they don't understand the consequences of not having "internal controls".

    6. Re:Actually, no... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This happened in my company. Accountant had their hand over the transfer button before it was judged to be a scam.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  11. How does this work? by chthon · · Score: 1

    Because there are many people who are more greedy than smart.

  12. Human nature by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as people get older their brains go. Not always, but there's plenty enough that do. A lot of these people have money from retirement earned before their minds went. The only thing you can do (besides curing age related cognitive decline) is try and keep the scammers away from them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Human nature by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      We could also prevent them from voting.

    2. Re: Human nature by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This logic would have to follow. Down the rabbit hole we go.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re:Human nature by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      What did the foo fighters ever do to you?
      or are you talking about the Fantastic Four?

  13. Re:But why Nigeria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They do. Ghana has actually mixed online scamming with witchcraft, they call it Sakawa.

  14. More blue hairs, bud by rojash · · Score: 1

    There are more old widows that can afford this shit, and are gullible too

  15. You know what they say? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't an effective way to con people out of money, it would not have been around for as long as it has and it's been around since the advent of the fax machine. I remember my dad getting these random faxes at work with the same old song and dance, Nigerian up front fee scams.

  16. not sure if it's nigerian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    recently I received

    "Hello!

    Do not consider on my illiteracy, I am foreign.We uploaded mine malicious program onto your OS.After that I stole all privy information from your system. Furthermore I had some more compromising.The most entertaining evidence which I thieftend- its a videotape with your self-abusing.I installed virus on a porn site and after you installed it. When you chose the video and pressed play button, my deleterious soft immediately downloaded on your system.

    After loading, your web camera made the video with you wanking, furthermore it captured exactly the porn video you wanked on. In next few days my virus captured all your social and work contacts.

    If you want to erase all the evidence- pay me 760 euro in BTC(cryptocurrency).
    It is my Bitcoin wallet address - foobarbas

    You have 20 hours since now. If I see transfer I will eliminate the evidence permanently. Differently I will forward the record to all your friends."

    1. Re:not sure if it's nigerian by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I've received the same scam, almost word-for-word. If I were to respond, I'd be asking the sender how he managed to install his Windows-specific malware on my Linux box and get it to bypass my firewall. Of course, that would just verify my email address, so I just nuked it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  17. This is an old problem of the modern era by DoktorMidnight · · Score: 1

    As it was long said and attributed (with questionable veracity) to PT Barnum: "There's a sucker born every minute." The problem is that increasing technological sophistication and socio-economic complexity have forced us to recalculate the sucker creation rate to something like one sucker generated every 10.5 seconds. Give or take a second due to server load balance issues.

  18. Billing scam, not Nigerian scam at all by XXongo · · Score: 1
    Right. This is not the classic "Nigerian Scam".

    What is described here is an invoice scam (or "billing scam").
    https://www.scamwatch.gov.au/types-of-scams/buying-or-selling/false-billing
    https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/fraud-az-invoice-scams
    https://www.ag.state.mn.us/consumer/Publications/FakeInvoices.asp
    https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2018/02/phishers-send-fake-invoices

  19. So... about 13 people then by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

    also known as 419 fraud, still ensnares a ton of people

    So... about 13 people then.

  20. Re:But why Nigeria? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Surely other countries have spammers too?

    Only the first level of scammer is typically in Nigeria. They are the ones who mass send out the e-mails and harvest e-mails from online mailing lists, etc. Once they catch a potential target they pass the account off to someone typically who has a little better English, and frequently living in Europe. They work in teams (if you pay attention, you can catch their e-mail address changing sometime- this is when you're getting passed off to one of the better informed scammers).

    There was a big hub of activity out of Amsterdam at one point for the higher level scammers. I'm not sure where they are located nowadays, but Amsterdam was a hub for the higher level scammers back when I followed this 15 years ago.

    As for why Nigeria, it was popularized, one person had success and friends found out- and it spread. They also have very little enforcement to prevent people scamming. They have relatively large number of internet cafes (or had... nowadays I'm sure they have cell-phones so could do this from anywhere).

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  21. Follow the yellow brick road... by Julz · · Score: 1

    Only problem is that, it's green ($$$) and muddy (like their heads). People are getting more greedy and stupid to boot.

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  22. Good news by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny

    If an actual Nigerian prince ever gets into a pickle and needs some assistance from strangers, it's good to know that the general public hasn't yet become too jaded to help, and he still has some hope.

  23. Hmm... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    Lemme tell you, one day some African noble who will actually have millions in off-shore accounts and only needs $100 to unlock them will try to find people online to help him out and nobody will take him seriously /s There is no patch for stupidity.

  24. Re:But why Nigeria? by slew · · Score: 1

    Sadly, multi-level marketing and lead trafficking is an un-stopable business endeavor...

    Even for semi-legit organizations, say if you donate money to some non-profit. Non-profits often outsource fundraising. If you decide to donate to one non-profit, the fund raising company might actually sell the fact that you donated up the food chain to another larger organization so they can attempt to solicit money from you. This information is a called a "lead" and there are whole businesses built upon selling lead information. The money they make from selling the leads can help to subsidize their business (in addition to the money they skim of the donations). However, once again, you are the product in this scenario, they are selling information about you to who knows who. If you donate to non profits, at a minimum you should look at their donor privacy policy, but realize they often sub-contract their work.

    As a more industrial example, basically google adwords is a gigantic lead generating framework which companies dump big money into...

    When you look at things from the perspective of business, these low-level scammers are simply generating leads for the high-level scammers...

  25. Location confusion by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There is probably lots of confusion between someone claiming to be from Nigeria versus scams actually happening in Nigeria, and vice versa. If I were a Nigerian scammer I would not claim to be in Nigeria because of the country's spamming stigma. For anything mailed, I'd get a buddy in another country to help.

  26. I get these a lot by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I've had the same email address since the early nineties, back when we didn't see the harm in having our email addresses in plaintext on Usenet (boy does that sound dumb now) and even despite spam filters I have to wade through junk mail on a daily basis.

    Every so often I browse through the email caught by my spam filter, on the off chance that I am missing something important. (I have a photography business and get job offers through email.) The Nigerian Prince, God Fearing Mom, Crooked General, Post Office Worker and the like are pretty common, and if I run across a scam I hadn't heard of before, I'll read through it so I know how to warn friends and family.

    The thing is, even the best of them are really poorly written. Syntax is off, language is stilted, word choice is poor -- there's still a lot of indications that these things are written by people with not a lot of education. (So much so that they can be an entertaining read for certain values of humor.)

    These things are easy to spot, and have been in the news for, like, ever. Why are people still falling for them? Do victims lack the sophistication to recognize badly written and totally implausible scams?

    The snarky part of me wants to add "I blame public schools".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  27. Michael Gary Scott by johnsnails · · Score: 1
  28. Re:Those shifty Negroes. by fisted · · Score: 1

    I actually laughed out loud when I read

    groups of fraudsters in Nigeria continue to make millions off of these classic cons.

    because it's too adorable that whoever wrote that thinks you actually have to be in Nigeria to pull off the Nigerian prince scam...

  29. They wouldn't understand by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    these emails are going after people with borderline dementia (or full blown dementia). The reason the instances are ticking up is the boomers are getting older and their brains are going before their bodies. Science can keep their hearts from failing but it can't yet fix the brain.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They wouldn't understand by mentil · · Score: 1

      So the money spent on fighting confidence scams should instead be spent on curing dementia? I'm cool with that.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  30. Nigirian Scams bah - charities are the worst by msevior · · Score: 1

    My 87 year old mother keeps sending "Legitimate" Charities more money than she can really afford after they send her sob story emails. Because she has a record of supporting them in the past they won't let go. I'll never support a mainstream charity with an email operation again.

    1. Re:Nigirian Scams bah - charities are the worst by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      The phone operations are probably more effective.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  31. I used to collect these scam emails ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I used to collect these scam emails on my web site.

    Every week or two, I will get an email asking if such and such email is true, or asking to verify a winning ticket, or contacting the Sultan of Brunei for charity or a project, ...etc..

    The sad thing is that while some of these emails are from the USA and other developed countries, the vast majority are from desperate people in poor countries. Some of them already paid the scammers and believe the documents provided by them, such as lawyer and bank certificates with official stamps on them.

  32. ML/AI by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Are they using ML/AI technologies to identify their victims?