Slashdot Mirror


Trump Withdraws US From Iran Nuclear Deal (nytimes.com)

President Trump on Tuesday announced he is withdrawing the United States from the Iran nuclear deal, a historic accord signed in 2015 that aims to limit Tehran's nuclear ability for more than a decade in return for lifting international oil and financial sanctions against the country. "This was a horrible one-sided deal that should never, ever been made," Mr. Trump said at the White House in announcing his decision. "It didn't bring calm, it didn't bring peace, and it never will." The New York Times reports: Mr. Trump's announcement, while long anticipated and widely telegraphed, plunges America's relations with European allies into deep uncertainty. They have committed to staying in the deal, raising the prospect of a diplomatic and economic clash as the United States reimposes stringent sanctions on Iran. It also raises the prospect of increasing tensions with Russia and China, which also are parties to the agreement.

One person familiar with negotiations to keep the accord in place said the talks collapsed over Mr. Trump's insistence that sharp limits be kept on Iran's nuclear fuel production after 2030. The deal currently lifts those limits. As a result, the United States is now preparing to reinstate all sanctions it had waived as part of the nuclear accord -- and impose additional economic penalties as well, according to another person briefed on Mr. Trump's decision.
Despite Trump's decision, President Hassan Rouhani said that Iran would remain committed to a multinational nuclear deal. "If we achieve the deal's goals in cooperation with other members of the deal, it will remain in place. [...] By exiting the deal, America has officially undermined its commitment to an international treaty," Rouhani said in a televised speech. "I have ordered the foreign ministry to negotiate with the European countries, China and Russia in coming weeks. If at the end of this short period we conclude that we can fully benefit from the JCPOA with the cooperation of all countries, the deal would remain," he added.

3 of 900 comments (clear)

  1. Re:If I were Iran I'd just wait it out by Kohath · · Score: 1, Troll

    What they cannot fix is the total loss of credibility. Who is going to negotiate with US in good fate when they now that any accord may be gone with the next administration?

    That's a lesson other countries would be very wise to learn.

    I suggest they learn to solve international problems without US involvement. Learn fast.
     

    US has had a strong influence on the world and steady allies, because of steady policy, generous aid, certain moral high ground, and ideas like free trade and democracy. All this is now gone or on the way out.

    Exactly the same thing happened when President Obama abandoned US allies in Iraq and left the place open for ISIS.

    No one should take US international commitments seriously until US politics depolarizes.

    And people in the US with globalist dreams should wake up and realize that you can't project a worldview your citizens don't believe in.

  2. Re:If I were Iran I'd just wait it out by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0, Troll

    It would really help if you impeached him. Show that the rule of law comes above the president and politics.

    In the long run wouldn't it be great if this destroyed the Republican party? Maybe break the two party system too. Same could happen with Brexit - it will be so bad that the Tories could be out for decades with a bit of luck, making way for other parties to rise.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:Ben Rhodes admitted lying to sell it by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you ask google the same question, you will get more credible citations than you can eat. Willful ignorance is not charming.

    Neither is laziness. Saying "Search Google" is a cop out, because you can't list any. The closest I was able to find prior to posting my question to you is a claim from Adam Schiff that there was "more than circumstantial evidence" but he wouldn't elaborate. So there is no specific evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to "fix" the election.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.