Slashdot Mirror


California High Schooler Changes Grades After Phishing Teachers, Gets 14 Felonies for His Efforts (gizmodo.com)

Police in Concord, California arrested a teenager earlier this week and charged him 14 felony counts after discovering the high schooler launched a phishing campaign directed at teachers in order to steal their passwords and change grades. From a report: The 16-year-old student, whose name was not released because he's a minor, was arrested Wednesday following an investigation launched by local law enforcement, with assistance from a Contra Costa County task force and the US Secret Service, KTVU reported. Reports of the hack first started to trickle into police two weeks ago, when teachers in the Mount Diablo Unified School District started receiving suspicious emails in their inbox. As it turns out, they were part of a phishing attempt launched by the student. The email messages contained a link that sent the recipients to a fake website constructed by the student to look like the school's portal. If a teacher clicked on the link, they were directed to the site that would prompt them to enter their username and password. The site would record any information entered, allowing the student to hijack the teacher's account.

46 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Zero Tolerance by mentil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's almost 5 days' worth of felonies. Too bad 'zero tolerance' replaced 'let the punishment fit the crime.'
    If he's lucky, the FBI will hire him and get him a shorter/commuted sentence.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  2. Harsh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A felony is a massive life-altering consequence that is not necessarily the most useful way to address or punish a problem. The kid's sixteen. Would you charge a kid with sixteen felonies for opening a teacher's grade book and turning an F into an A with an old-fashioned pen? The fact that he used computers to do it shouldn't increase the punishment.

    1. Re:Harsh. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that he used computers to do it shouldn't increase the punishment

      I agree. But this is a bit more serious than sneakily messing with the grade book between classes. More like having the janitor called away from his office on some pretext, sneaking in there to steal his keys, duplicating them, then using the keys to break into the school at night and change the grade book.

      Still, not something that warrants a felony charge. With kids, focus of the sentence should be on rehabilitation rather than retribution. How this this work with minors in the USA anyway, does a juvie conviction stay on one's permanent record?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Harsh. by fafalone · · Score: 4, Informative

      At 16, he'll probably be charged as a minor depending on the state and exact offense (more serious crimes would definitely get someone tried as an adult at 16 tho). As long as he's charged as a minor, it's not on his 'permanent record' in the sense it's sealed, so he doesn't have to say (and court checks won't show) that he's a convicted felon after he turns 18 (or 21 in some cases).

    3. Re: Harsh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I did something along those exact same lines but for unfettered access to the computer lab. I got caught and my principal took pity on me and allowed me to take a Commodore 64 home on weekends and drafted me a specific note allowing me computer time anytime my class work was complete.

      No cops called..

      Oh the memories ...

  3. Lowering grades? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he just raised random people's grades (so as not to point only to himself), it might have slipped by un-noticed. But students who got lower-than-expected grades would likely complain, causing an investigation. Hoist by his own petard, so to speak.

    Should we ruin his life with 14 felonies over it? Nope. He needs a slap in the hand and some direction, not serious jail time and a record. Unpaid community service conducting teacher training on cybersecurity and Internet hygiene would be about right.

    But 'murkah and harsh "justice."

    1. Re:Lowering grades? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US has a higher incarceration rate than most of the developed, democratic world, but doesn't have lower violent crime rates to show for it. The US system lacks a sense of proportion.

    2. Re:Lowering grades? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering a lot of people start being locked up for personal matters that shouldn't concern the state (like what substances they choose to put into their bodies), I don't think I am.

    3. Re:Lowering grades? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you're confusing cause and effect.

      No he isn't. Not all US states went on prison construction sprees. Those that did and those that didn't saw similar changes in crime rates. The prisons did little to help.

      Prisons help some by keeping criminals off the street, but they also hurt because they create hardened criminals with few other options, and they disrupt families and communities. If you want to prevent crime, there are smarter things to spend your budget on than mass incarceration, such as better education.

    4. Re:Lowering grades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Sealed is a myth really. When I was under 18 I ran afoul of the legal system, well let's just say a few times, and though I only had 1 thing go on my permanent record and it was really minor, The others were all classified as HBO [Handled by Officer] which means I wasn't even charged. Just got bitched out by the cops and that was that. Or so I thought until I joined the Navy, On my enlistment forms I reported everything I remembered and then a few weeks later I got a phone call from the Navy bitching me out like crazy saying things like falsifying my info was punishable by jail and blah blah blah up to 100k in fines blah blah blah. They then instructed me to be in their office the next day to resolve this. It was a 4+ hour drive and I was shitting bricks the whole way there,

      I get there and after a few hours was led to an interrogation room and after what seemed like weeks an officer what not came in and started reading me my rights,

      I was like whoa, whoa, whoa, WTF are you talking about. I was completely honest with my info. To which he tossed a few things on the table showing the HBO incidents and said then what are these?
      I was like, 1st off what the hell does HBO mean [that is where I learned what Handled by Officer meant] and I was like DUDE the cops bitched me out and told me to go home how was that even on my record?. He was like, EVERYTHING is on your record. Then I was like, but what happened to when I turned 18 everything was expunged, and that was when he said NOTHING is "sealed" and nothing is ever removed from your record.

      That day I leaned a LOT and was pretty scared and then he was like, since this was really minor shit and he could tell I didn't do it on purpose that he was going to drop the matter and a few months later I was in boot camp.

      Still pretty scary to be put through that when you're 18. [this was in 1982 so things might be different now] But I still remember it like it was yesterday.

    5. Re:Lowering grades? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not recidivism. It's a returning customer.

    6. Re:Lowering grades? by CriticalYetLazy · · Score: 2

      Yeah totally agree cause all 16 year olds make great informed decisions, always, which they never regret. Sigh. I bet you always were a conscious little teen weren't you?

    7. Re:Lowering grades? by dwillden · · Score: 2

      Actually we do have lower violent crime rates to show for it, as the rise in incarceration was due to increased prosecution in order to stem rapidly rising crime rates that started climbing in the 60's until peaking in the 90's Since then crime rates have dropped by over 50%, and in recent years the incarceration rate has dropped.

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-mass-incarceration-1456184736

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    8. Re:Lowering grades? by Ly4 · · Score: 4, Informative

      An opinion piece from the WSJ isn't exactly a useful citation. It's paywalled - do they ever get around to comparing the US to other countries or do they just whine about the term 'mass incarceration'?

      It's not difficult to find articles and studies that contradict the whole 'incarceration reduced crime' theory. This one includes this bit:

      Fortunately, there is a real-time experiment underway. For many reasons, including straitened budgets and a desire to diminish prison populations, many states have started to cut back on imprisonment. What happened? Interestingly, and encouragingly, crime did not explode. In fact, it dropped. In the last decade, 14 states saw declines in both incarceration and crime. New York reduced imprisonment by 26 percent, while seeing a 28 percent reduction in crime. Imprisonment and crime both decreased by more than 15 percent in California, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, and Texas.

    9. Re: Lowering grades? by reanjr · · Score: 2

      If your 16 year child old can't figure out how to use a network legally, then you shouldn't be letting them near a computer. Raise your fucking kids. When you let society do it, they end up with a dozen felony charges.

  4. They should make them misdemeanors by ITRambo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fools that charge the kid with felonies risk putting a talented hacker onto a road to a life of crime by introducing him to real felony criminals in prison, if it went that far. While his hacks were easily reversible, they should show some respect for his skill at exposing the ignorance of this teachers, and put him on a good path and not possibly in prison, by forcing him to teach teachers how to avoid the folly that they fell for. This is the epitome of a victimless crime.

    1. Re:They should make them misdemeanors by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2

      Talented hacker?

      He got caught, for God's sake.
      He's a stupid.

          -- Zohan Dvir

    2. Re:They should make them misdemeanors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Equating all crimes (as you seem to be) is the real stupidity. Felonies should be reserved for major thefts and serious harm to others' health or lives. By making everything a felony, the American system has lost all sense of proportion.

    3. Re:They should make them misdemeanors by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      A crime is merely what is illegal, it isn't synonymous with what is wrong. And no one will say (honestly) all crimes are equal.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:They should make them misdemeanors by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The stupid thing is he's probably going to face a harsher punishment than the people responsible for the Equifax leak. All he did was try to change his grades. Equifax put over a hundred million people's credit and finances at risk.

      Though I have to say, if he'd put as much effort into studying as he did setting up this phishing attempt (create a website which mimics the official school site?), he probably wouldn't have needed to change his grades.

    5. Re:They should make them misdemeanors by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      When I was about 12 I had this brilliant idea: learn Braille, tape the cheat sheets under my trousers and then I can read them in tests and it looks just like I'm rubbing or scratching my thighs.

      I realised it'd be easier to just study for the tests.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:They should make them misdemeanors by JeffOwl · · Score: 2

      You are buying into the hype. This isn't meant to send him to prison. This is meant to get him to take a plea deal while impressing upon him that this was serious. Any halfway decent lawyer will see that the kid serves no time in proper jail. Since he apparently thought this was OK, he is in need of something. Exposing the ignorance of his teachers is not a good excuse. You could use that for so many cases, you can't make "it was easy" a mitigation.

    7. Re: They should make them misdemeanors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Jaywalking is also hard to catch and prosecute. So is graffiti (which causes more damage than what he did). We don't make the punishment for either very severe. Punishment should be proportional to damage caused or intended, not to difficulty of prosecution.

    8. Re: They should make them misdemeanors by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Yet murder, if you're a soldier or cop, is perfectly legal, and often celebrated.

  5. Re:Serves them right by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But if anyone who's likely to be called to jury duty on the case is reading this, some advice:

    nullify.
    Nullify.
    NULLIFY.

    Not that it's likely to get that far in a juvie case, but still ... remember that it's always your right to judge the law as well as the case.

  6. In my day... by Kaenneth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used a keylogger entered into the machine with physically blocked ports via crashing the teacher app to DOS by entering a password longer than 255 characters then using "COPY CON: KL.COM" and ALT-numpad entered machine code from my notebook to copy the next characters typed (which would be the next teachers password) to high memory for me to retrieve later.

    I only used it to lower bullies grades, not boost my own.

    1. Re:In my day... by TFAFalcon · · Score: 2

      He was just lashing out from problems at school. The bullies should be grateful, the lower grades probably toughened them up.

  7. Graded F in Hacking by MrKaos · · Score: 2

    Evidently he wasn't hacking to learn.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  8. Re:Serves them right by lsllll · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Uryjay Ullificationay"

    lol. I had to look that up on Google and realized what it was when Google asked me if I meant "Jury Nullification"!

    --
    Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
  9. Re: Serves them right by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Mount Diablo Unified School District"

    He was clearly going through hell.

    Completely off topic trivia: From the summit of Mt Diablo (Devil's Peak) in Concord CA, you can see more of the earth's surface than anyplace else on earth with the sole exception of the summit of Mt Kilimanjaro. Like Kilimanjaro, Mt Diablo is an isolated peak, surrounded by vast flat surfaces (California's Central Valley to the East, and San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean to the West). You can see roughly 80,000 sq miles on a clear day.

  10. Before everybody gets too worked up about this... by imperious_rex · · Score: 2

    Keep in mind these are 14 felony *charges*, not convictions. Prosecutors always go for the maximum they can charge so defendants can plea-bargain down to something more reasonable. Although a court date is set, it will probably be settled in a plea bargain and never go to a jury trial. Given how it's the kid's first offense and the lesser gravity of the "crimes" (altering grades is less serious than stealing money, copyright infringement, or NSA documents), the actual convictions will probably be plea bargained down to misdemeanors and the kid will probably be slapped with a hefty fine (which his parents will be on the hook for, as he is a minor), do some non-trivial community service time, and have restrictions placed on his internet access for a period of time (maybe 1-2 years). Worst case: the prosecutor is an overzealous asshole and wants to make an example of the kid. If so, the poor kid's life is seriously f**ked.

  11. Re:Before everybody gets too worked up about this. by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prosecutors always go for the maximum they can charge so ... it will probably be settled in a plea bargain and never go to a jury trial.

    You don't think maybe there is a problem with the legal system when this is a thing? That prosecutors have a tool they can use to avoid having to prove their cases? That they not only have the will to do this, it is basically standard operating procedure at this point?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  12. Courts sadly only way to punish by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    Should we ruin his life with 14 felonies over it? Nope.

    I completely agree - this should be handled internally by the school. However, if parents are going to use the courts to stop their kids being punished by schools then it's not surprising that schools have ended up having to use the courts to punish students. Courts are not at all designed to cope with misbehaving schoolkids and the result is that either they get off scot-free or they end up with life-ruining consequences.

  13. Appropriate Punishment by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody is arguing that he should not be punished it is the severity of the punishment that is in question. A badly behaved schoolkid changing a few internal school grades is not the sort of thing a court is designed to deal with. You cannot achieve justice in schools through the court system: either kids will get off without any punishment or they end up with extremely serious consequences. What is needed is serious, but not life-changing consequences so they have a chance to learn from their mistakes.

  14. Anyone taking bets? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bet that the teacher is not going to be at least reprimanded for being stupid enough to be phished by a kid.

    This is why security doesn't work. Being stupid is not being punished.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re:Serves them right by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No kidding. 14 felonies for this? As a teenager, I too phished my teacher (and much of my class) successfully for their passwords by making a mock DOS prompt that mimicked basic commands and the login program. To be fair, I didn't do anything "evil" with it - as part of my final project, I actually encoded the teacher's username and password into stereogram with a generator that I wrote ;) She found it amusing. I'm sure she wouldn't have found it so amusing if I had been in there changing grades or whatnot. But 14 felones for a teenager acting up is just insane.

    I'll consider these charges fair when they start charging high school bullies who beat up other students with 14 counts of assault.

    --
    "WANTED: Sinking ship seeks rats."
  16. Re:Ruin his life? by CriticalYetLazy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    99% of teens age 16 are assholes sometimes. Punishing them for life would almost guarantee them to become assholes most of the time.

  17. Save Ferris by craigwilkie · · Score: 2

    Bueller. Bueller. Bueller.

    Mind you, he never got caught.

  18. Drunk on power, unaccountable, cruel by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

    Have these law enforcers gone completely mad? They charged a fucking schoolboy with 14 "felonies" for cheating on his grades. That's an outrageous abuse of office. I say let the little boy off, and lock up the deranged & dangerous law enforcer who laid those preposterous charges.

  19. Re:Serves them right by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't do anything "evil" with it

    So you only committed 13 felonies?

  20. Believe it or not, engaging in fraud is actually illegal. No matter how dumb you think they are.

    And if you just "slap on the wrist", there's little disincentive to do it.

  21. Re:Serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll consider these charges fair when they start charging high school bullies who beat up other students with 14 counts of assault.

    Maybe we can make it go the other way, "Nerds will be nerds", and be done with it!

  22. Re:Before everybody gets too worked up about this. by Kjella · · Score: 2

    You don't think maybe there is a problem with the legal system when this is a thing?

    Plea bargaining is not bad, it's the American mockery of it. Here in Norway a typical plea length is ~80% of what the prosecution will ask for at trial, which seem sufficient for the vast majority of cases where the evidence is compelling. It's not worth gambling on a 1% technicality, while if they're trying to bring a dubious case to trial the risk of the full 100% is not going to scare off the innocent. In the US it's more like we have this scrap of evidence of a misdemeanor, take this plea bargain for 3 months or we'll try to put you away for 30 years. There should be a law that told the jury what plea bargain the defendant got and refused, maybe the at-trial convictions would not be so crazy. Because the problem is juries are often willing to "upsold" to say maybe not 30 but 10 years where even that is ridiculous.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  23. Re:Serves them right by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    This probably didn't cause any more inconvenience than the average college prank. Things like reassembling a car in a library, moving a professor's office to another floor, turning the MIT dome into a giant breast, or putting a piece of dating software onto a campus email system (in the UNIX shell days, the software kept a list of male and female students and would send random "write" messages or "ytalk" requests between them). So it should be treated as such - clean the results up, and some detention, since it's high school, not college.

  24. Relevant Skills by bigdavex · · Score: 2

    Maybe he can hack in and reduce it to 1 misdemeanor?

    --
    -Dave
  25. Re:Serves them right by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

    These are charges. He committed crimes, maliciously, with these stolen credentials. Presumably 14 of them. Wait for the sentencing to see if they go to far.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.