Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Deleted 583 Million Fake Accounts in the First Three Months of 2018 (cnet.com)
Facebook said Tuesday that it had removed more than half a billion fake accounts and millions of pieces of other violent, hateful or obscene content over the first three months of 2018. From a report: In a blog post on Facebook, Guy Rosen, Facebook's vice president of product management, said the social network disabled about 583 million fake accounts during the first three months of this year -- the majority of which, it said, were blocked within minutes of registration. That's an average of over 6.5 million attempts to create a fake account every day from Jan. 1 to March 31. Facebook boasts 2.2 billion monthly active users, and if Facebook's AI tools didn't catch these fake accounts flooding the social network, its population would have swelled immensely in just 89 days.
that would be a good start
Now if Facebook would just disable the other 2.2 billion accounts, we'd be getting somewhere.
Thanks for the news, but I gotta say I hate CNet's habit of throwing you an auto play video every time you click on a link. I'm on a slow wi-fi network and just closing the floating window doesn't stop the audio, which you can't pause until the embedded video is loaded and you find it. I wonder why they keep being this annoying. I was a fan of their website before that but then I turned my back to them because I felt like they didn't care about User Experience at all. Feels good speaking about it.
I also considered "NOT a real penalty" as the Subject.
So let's start with the question of "Why?"
Because a fresh fake identity is extremely valuable. It starts out with the polite respect most of us accord to any stranger. The sock puppet loses nothing by getting nuked, but polite and civil discourse was destroyed first.
Solution approach: Use EPR (Earned Public Reputation) to make fake identities less valuable. Actually, the default visibility setting can be calibrated against the number of fake identities that are being created (among other factors). If visibility has to be earned by sustained niceness and if bad behaviors are remembered and suitably penalized (with reduced visibility), then the social environment would be greatly improved.
Yes, even on Slashdot. One way to think of EPR is as enhanced karma with teeth attached.
ADSAuPR, atAJG, but even better if you have a better solution or solution approach to discuss. The typical responses on Slashdot these years are just bits of shallow snark, sometimes followed by a trickle of ideas worth thinking about...
(I increasingly feel that's yet another time-related problem, mostly caused by the uniform cycle time of the top page. One solution there would be variable descent speeds, with more significant stories falling more slowly--but that presumes Slashdot had an economic model that actually supported sustained improvement. ( in Japanese.))
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
This assumes that account creation rate is independent of the account deletion rate, with no justification and for no particular reason, other than to cap the submission summary text with a de rigueur derf derf.
When they asked me to provide an ID with my fake name(nickname), I made a fake ID in photoshop, took a picture of it and sent it, now my fake name account is verified as legit.
All their trolling and stalking accounts have been deleted, oh noes! xD xD xD
You know, before they got strict.
I never use it, but it makes me happy to know I got one over on them.
So If I should direct my AI chat bot at Faceplant and they don't delete the account does it pass the Turing test?
Once account is created I could then start feeding it fake information on location, web browsing, nose picking, slashdot posts, personal interactions, take out orders, credit reports and a plethora of other useless information to maintain my bots humanist endeavor.
Or is this the bot?
Muhahahahaha
If visibility has to be earned by sustained niceness and if bad behaviors are remembered and suitably penalized (with reduced visibility), then the social environment would be greatly improved.
That sounds suspiciously like the suppression of free speech.
Instead of enforcing some nebulous universal value-of-people, why not let individuals choose what they would like to see and hear?
That way I can listen to whoever I want, and you don't have to concern yourself with whether the person I'm listening to has good social standing or not.
Shadow profiles are used to prevent data scraping. Didn't you know? To prevent scraping data from an account that never existed they create a new account FOR YOU! You don't even have to do anything. Isn't that brilliant? It makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
1) The information is that interesting if you're doing A.I. research or market research for advertising, or A.I. research for market research for advertising.
2) Direct access to a communications channel with millions/billions of verified real humans constitutes indirect access to a vastly more interesting bottomless trove of data for anyone doing the types of things mentioned above in point #1.
"Facebook boasts 2.2 billion monthly active users, and if Facebook's AI tools didn't catch these fake accounts flooding the social network, its population would have swelled immensely in just 89 days."
I have ~four Facebook accounts but only three I keep track of but I use them over each others as I get banned and Facebook definitely haven't removed any of them meaning they let me have at-least three accounts.
From the part about one could kinda see some speculation about how 600 million more accounts on top of 2.2 billion would be a large increase but either Facebook see my three(+) accounts as unique active accounts and if so 2.2 billion become off from the real user-base with people like me (we may not be all that many, but yeah, as far as numbers goes there's plenty of "fake" already) or they have figured out I'm one and the same person but let me be and if so they aren't counting all the accounts.
I guess maybe they do count all my accounts but if so that just mean Facebook have a smaller user base than what they say.