Slashdot Mirror


The Boston Restaurant Where Robots Have Replaced the Chefs (washingtonpost.com)

Started by a group of 20-something robotics engineers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology who partnered with Michelin-starred chef Daniel Boulud, Spyce in downtown Boston is founded on the idea that a fulfilling meal can be more science than spontaneity [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source]. From a report: The restaurant's founders have replaced human chefs with seven automated cooking pots that simultaneously whip up meals in three minutes or less. A brief description of meal preparation -- courtesy of 26-year-old co-founder, Michael Farid -- can sound more like laboratory instructions than conventional cooking. "Once you place your order, we have an ingredient delivery system that collects them from the fridge," Farid said.

"The ingredients are portioned into the correct sizes and then delivered to a robotic wok, where they are tumbled at 450 degrees Fahrenheit. The ingredients are cooked and seared. And once the process is complete, the woks tilt downward and put food into a bowl. And then they're ready to be garnished and served." Spyce bills itself as "the world's first restaurant featuring a robotic kitchen that cooks complex meals," a distinction that appears to reference burger-flipping robots like "Flippy," who plied his trade in a California fast food kitchen before being temporary suspended -- because he wasn't working fast enough.

110 comments

  1. Complex? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure I agree that stir-fry qualifies as a "complex meal."

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Complex? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      It looks like one of those slop a bunch of cooked stuff in a bowl with some spice and rice. It looks like it is about $2 cheaper than their competitors.

    2. Re:Complex? by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I cook.

      It's not complex cooking at all. Quite frankly I'd like to see them make a robot that could cook steak, potatoes, side veggies meal....because I'm quite certain they couldn't. Even a quality hamburger would confound a robot.

    3. Re:Complex? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Obvious troll is obvious. Try harder.

      Steak is easy, because you just have to shine a flashlight on both sides and it's cooked.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steak is easy because it's not even delicious until it's well done so just have a camera compare its albedo against asphalt or something.

      Well there, we seem to have a vegetarian troll passing through.

    5. Re:Complex? by gnick · · Score: 1

      My steaks cook for 4 minutes in a cast iron pan as hot as my electric oven/range can get it. My only interaction is spreading a little canola oil and some seasoning on each side, flipping it 3 times, and moving it from the range into the oven. It could be easily automated and it makes a pretty good steak. Maybe other people like to get more elaborate with their preparation, but I'm happy with what I produce. A baked potato on the side seems easy and I'm sure we could find a robot-friendly veggie dish.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    6. Re:Complex? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What is the oven part for? I'm asking seriously.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Complex? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree that stir-fry qualifies as a "complex meal."

      Well maybe complex is not the right word but you can make varied dishes using the same cooking technique, like here's beef, pork, chicken, shrimp, vegetarian with rice or noodles, different accessories and spices etc. and it's made-to-order so it can be exactly how you want it with robot precision. Personally I think the latter could be the killer feature here, sure you could explain it to a human chef but then you'd have to instruct him in detail every time which would get tedious and you could never fine tune it. Instead you can order the exact same Beef Teriyaki the way you like it or try to create a better variation. If they actually have that flexibility and you don't simply pick fixed weight ingredients, they just show the fryer and not what happens on the backside if the ingredients are dispensed or placed into the stir-adder by staff.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Complex? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. I used to always order salad dressing on the side since it was simpler to add the amount I wanted than try to explain it. Another thing I noticed in the video, they have some sort of buffet of various other things you can add to it, so the human is still doing a lot of the work.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    9. Re:Complex? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think I saw in the video there is some option to save your favorites so you were on target with that prediction.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    10. Re:Complex? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      What is the oven part for? I'm asking seriously.

      To cook the steak. The pan part is merely to sear the outside and start the maiard reaction. However, the steak won't be cooked through since there isn't enough prolonged heat in a pan.

      Granted, if you like your steak raw or rare, you can skip the oven step.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    11. Re:Complex? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      That would be easier than stir fry for a robot. That's a stupid simple mean to make.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    12. Re:Complex? by Ken_g6 · · Score: 2

      It's not that complex, but I bet you could automate most of a Noodles & Co. this way.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    13. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just turn the heat down by 40% after the pan gets hot and finish the steak in 6 minutes from that time.

      Works pretty great, but all pan methods are inferior to grilling.

    14. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up America's Test kitchen cooking steak. The process should actually be the other way IIRC. You should use the oven to evenly cook the steak inside and out to just about the doneness you want and then you sear the outside of the steak to get the grill marks and additional skin flavor.

      It is much easier to do it this way (either direction) to get a prefect steak than to attempt to get the grill perfect enough to sear the outside without burning it to get a medium or medium-rare steak.

    15. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steak is actually really easy when reverse seared. Reverse searing is also automation-friendly.

    16. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a cook and an engineer.

      Burgers are pretty easy to automate. All you need are thermocouples and a flipper mechanism. If you want to ensure a nice sear, a simple vision system isn't hard to setup (the model would be pretty easy to train).

      Steak is easy to automate as well (again thermocouples). Potatoes and veggies are already automated in the video linked.

    17. Re:Complex? by gnick · · Score: 1

      I do a minute and a half on each side in a 500 F oven to cook the meat through. I first sear it on the range with the pan considerably hotter and finally rest it a couple of minutes wrapped in foil. If I wanted to cook the steak on the range, I'd leave it longer on lower heat. I've done that too; that method doesn't require putting all the smoke detectors in the bathroom.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    18. Re:Complex? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      If it can be cooked by a robot, it didn't need a Chef in the first place.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    19. Re:Complex? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Tip: Let the steak come to room temperature. Then the insides will be a nice medium rare by the time you get a char on the outsides.

      Don't worry about nasties because they will all be murderated by the cast iron pan.

      Not recommend for ground beef unless you cook to recommenced temperature.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    20. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the fuck would you "rest" a steak or wrap it in foil?

    21. Re:Complex? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Everything is inferior to using a sous-vide and then grilling it. Very tender steak, well done on the outside. Even the worst steak can be made extremely tender.

      And I bet it could be automated based on the volume. It just wouldn't be fast, but it would be quite insensitive to the exact time in the bath and grilling it afterwards would also be easy.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    22. Re:Complex? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      It makes it more tender.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    23. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the fuck would you "rest" a steak or wrap it in foil?

      Letting meat rest after cooking allows the juices (not blood) redistribute so they don't all gush out with the first cut. Tenting it with foil while it rests retains the right amount of heat.

    24. Re:Complex? by LetterRip · · Score: 1

      It's not complex cooking at all. Quite frankly I'd like to see them make a robot that could cook steak, potatoes, side veggies meal....because I'm quite certain they couldn't. Even a quality hamburger would confound a robot.

      Sous vide is the best way to cook all of those and it is very easily automated.

    25. Re:Complex? by gnick · · Score: 1

      I've had sous-vide -> sear and smoker -> sear and I prefer smoker. It's not what I do, but I would if it was convenient.

      Either a sous-vide or a smoker should be easy to automate.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    26. Re:Complex? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      false, you know nothing about cooking nor how to make a quality sandwich with ground beef. Note it hasn't been done, though a burger flipping robot was made. I am not writing of burger flipping.

    27. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chef is regulated to designating portions of ingredients (which is similar to how block buster chefs do it now.) Occasionally, a chef does produce a meaningful change to the culinary world (parmesan risotto comes to mind - https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/the-great-parmesan-rescue-why-the-superb-italian-cheese-is-worth-saving-8344337.html.)

    28. Re:Complex? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      No, you must have defective taste buds. What a disgusting thing to do to most foods.

    29. Re: Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tenting with foil keeps the top from drying out due to evaporation from the heat

    30. Re:Complex? by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "If it can be cooked by a robot, it didn't need a Chef in the first place"

      Right, all we know the 'robot' is doing is applying heat to the food.

      The main work seems to be done by humans, from adding garnishes to portioning the ingredients into little pots and sending them to the right tumbling wok, which they aren't showing or explaining to us for some reason.

      "Once you place your order, we have an ingredient delivery system that collects them from the fridge," Farid said. "The ingredients are portioned into the correct sizes and then delivered to a robotic wok"

    31. Re: Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor Sponge Bob.

    32. Re:Complex? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Everything is inferior to using a sous-vide

      Until you die of cancer from all the plastic residue in your boil-in-the-bag meals.

    33. Re:Complex? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      how to make a quality sandwich with ground beef

      Your problem is trying to make a sandwich with ground beef.

    34. Re:Complex? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's just as good, and $2 cheaper, I say bring on the "robots".

    35. Re:Complex? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Your problem is trying to make a sandwich with ground beef.

      It's called a hamburger steak sandwich. HTH, HAND.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Complex? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      The appropriate steak order is in fact "Scare it with a flashlight."

      The more common term is as I'm sure you know "blood rare" but I've had that served overcooked before. "Scare it with a flashlight" gets the waitperson's attention, gets a bit of a laugh, and gets you a steak that isn't overcooked.

      I'm not that much of a beef person, but if I'm going to eat it, I'm going to eat it cooked properly, which is to say barely cooked at all.

    37. Re:Complex? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Sounds overcooked.

      My favorite method is with a cast iron skillet that's almost glowing, and a coating of my custom spice blend on the steak.

      Coat steak with spice blend, toss into skillet, pour on a bit of melted butter. There will be flames. Wait about 30 seconds, flip, more butter, more flames, 30 more seconds, and put it on a plate to rest for a few minutes.

      It's best done outside or with an industrial extractor hood. Electricity won't cut it for the heat source.

    38. Re:Complex? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      No need for an oven for that, it's as done as I want it inside when it comes out of the refrigerator.

      And I'm not a fan of grill marks, I prefer a flat surface.

    39. Re:Complex? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Steak is actually quite complex for a robot. Thickness of steak, temperature of steak, toughness of steak, desired level of cooking, age of steak, the cut, all affect the outcome and the chef must react to them to deliver a professionally cooked steak reliably. The automated fry pots are not robots, they are just automated fry machines, not even close to being chefs. As for prepare the foods they night before, freshly cut vegetables taste better than old cut vegetables, bad things happen with chlorophyll and other elements as they break down over time.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    40. Re:Complex? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You sear first to stop the juices escaping while it's in the oven.

    41. Re:Complex? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's just as good, and $2 cheaper, I say bring on the "robots".

      Meh, robots cook with too much oil.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    42. Re:Complex? by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I like to do mine on top of a charcoal chimney before finishing in the oven to preference. It's slower than the Cast Iron Pan method for a single steak, but if you're doing more than that the chimney is faster. The chimney can fully sear an ice cold steak in 60 seconds or less, and be ready to do a dozen more. With the Pan you can really only do one or two at a time and you gotta clean the pan up a bit between steaks as well as get it back up to temperature after the oven cycle.

    43. Re:Complex? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Boiled meat...Spit.

      Low and slow is for tough cuts, not steak. Even there, leave the British methods in Britain. Smoke that brisket, don't boil it...what are you, Irish?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    44. Re:Complex? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'ice cold steak' is a mistake.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    45. Re:Complex? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you overcook your steak, you should let it rest for about half the cook time. If you really ruin it, you need to wrap the shoe leather in foil, so it doesn't become full tilt jerky.

      If you cook your steak right, you can't get it to the table is less than half the cook time. It should be at the body temperature of a living cow in the center. The trick is to get a thick enough steak so it's perfect when it's seared and releases from the grill, about 2 inches.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re:Complex? by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'm just pointing out how incredibly hot and hence fast the method is for getting the entire surface of the steak seared.

      The perfect method would be to sous vida the steaks first to 130, and then sear and serve. I don't have a setup for doing that though so I usually let them warm up on the counter top while I get everything else going. Then when the chimney is ready we sear the steaks and put them in the oven to finish.

    47. Re:Complex? by gnick · · Score: 1

      A charcoal chimney would make my apartment smell terrible.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    48. Re:Complex? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The body temperature of a living cow is 101.5 F. That's the ideal temperature for the center of a steak IMHO.

      Just sear it as you say, and get a thick enough steak so the center isn't overcooked (read cooked at all).

      Skip the oven, skip the boiled meat.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    49. Re:Complex? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're a dumbass troll. Gotcha.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    50. Re:Complex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bogus claim. Burger King has been using a robot to cook burgers for thirty years, since long before flippy came along.

  2. X Cuisine? by OffTheLip · · Score: 2

    Hopefully they are networking.

  3. I have a robot chef too by Dirk+Becher · · Score: 1

    It's commonly referred to as "microwave".

    1. Re:I have a robot chef too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the defrosting box?

      Those aren't good for cooking anything. They're not even that great at defrosting.

    2. Re:I have a robot chef too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the defrosting box?

      Those aren't good for cooking anything. They're not even that great at defrosting.

      Then you either don't know how to use it or are a food snob.

  4. Don't forget to leave a tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They may only be robotic woks, but their friends are everywhere...

    1. Re:Don't forget to leave a tip by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They gave him the blob fish!

    2. Re:Don't forget to leave a tip by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      You saw that episode too, eh? :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    3. Re:Don't forget to leave a tip by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I've seen ALL the episodes.

  5. Yeah by PPH · · Score: 1

    I saw that episode of the X-Files.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  6. what else? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    And you don't own anything and have to pay for a hefty yearly "subscription service" or they turn it off. amirite?

  7. This already has a name. by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This already has a name; it's called a factory. In other news, when all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

    1. Re:This already has a name. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      every problem looks like a skull.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. I guess what will happen next! by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google Assistant will book a table, and call a self-driving cab to my home. Then my Roomba will board the taxi, go to the robotic restaurant, and orders a meal (probably mabe up of WD40, and other stuff that robots like to eat). And finally everything is billed on *my* credit card, sigh.... -

    1. Re:I guess what will happen next! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows robots only eat alcohol

    2. Re:I guess what will happen next! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still would be cheaper than having a wife.

      The Roomba even sucks and cleans every day!

      ...

      I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    3. Re:I guess what will happen next! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows robots only eat alcohol

      And smoke cigars!

  9. Health insurance and vacation time by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    So, what is their benefit package? Due they get insurance and paid vacation? How about paid sick days?

    1. Re:Health insurance and vacation time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Worked on machine controls for over thirty years, and the machines get great health insurance. As soon as they get sick, a human is dispatched to help and we have parts on site to fix the most common health problems. As for vacation time, they get all of the time they need off for maintenance.

      As for myself, I haven't had a real vacation in over twenty-five years and haven't been to a doctor since I was 13, which was a little over forty years ago.

    2. Re:Health insurance and vacation time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the huge shortage of programmers for the past 30+ years, none of get time off. It just sucks never having taken a "real vacation" (to use your term) in my entire adult life. Also, Seattle Hundreds just suck. After a couple of years, that just gets to you and for at least me, has killed my short-term memory.

    3. Re:Health insurance and vacation time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We just call them volunteer slaves.

      Gotta grow a spine and claim what you need.

    4. Re:Health insurance and vacation time by Cederic · · Score: 1

      So there's a labour shortage, meaning companies have to compete for resources.. and yet the resources are being abused?

      That doesn't add up.

      If there's a shortage of programmers then demand sensible working hours and holiday. It's not fucking hard.

    5. Re:Health insurance and vacation time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So there's a labour shortage, meaning companies have to compete for resources.. and yet the resources are being abused?

      That's actually one of the questions in economics right now - why does America have such a low unemployment rate (at least officially) yet wage growth is stagnant.

      There's a few possibilities - that the unemployment rate doesn't reflect people who would work for more, but wouldn't work for the amounts being offered, thus causing a cap on prices (think stay-at-home-parent who would need a higher wage in order to offset daycare costs), wages reflecting high-paid baby-boomers retiring and entry level positions being filled by college students, competition from outsourcing creating a far larger supply of employees, etc.

    6. Re:Health insurance and vacation time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's your answer. America doesn't have a low unemployment rate. The Department of Labor has played with the numbers since the Reagan Administration. Real Unemployment is 22%. It's lower than its height during the Obama Administration of 24%. Before the 2008 recession it was 12%. Many of the people who lost their jobs then never returned to the work force.

  10. a beowulf cluster of robochefs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    moley.com has an amazing video of their robochef in action

  11. The Bender Flipping Unit by Zorro · · Score: 1

    "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    1. Re:The Bender Flipping Unit by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Daffodil.

  12. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there are no people cooking, who is going to spit in my food?

    1. Re:Hmm. by Zorro · · Score: 1

      If there are no people cooking, who is going to spit in my food?

      Bender can do that too.

  13. Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I want some slop out of a bag or box in the freezer or from a can I'll go to the grocery store and buy that for I'm sure a fraction of what these jokers are charging for a 'restaurant' 'meal'. Do not want, would not pay for it. If I'm eating out I want a human chef making me something special and nice not some shitty 'robot' making the equivalent of frozen food made in a factory somewhere. And of course what's already been in the works is firing all the waitstaff so all you do is deal with machines the entire time you're at their 'restaurant'. Screw that. There's nothing special about it, there's nothing value-added about it, why would I even bother going out to eat if that's all I'm going to get? May as well stay home and make my own food for the cost of ingredients and watch TV just like always.

    1. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      When you eat at McDonalds are you really expecting a dining experience, or do you just want to get your food in the least amount of time possible?

      Because that's all this is; glorified fast food that currently enjoys a novelty factor and niche marketing. Once that sparkly wow factor novelty wears off, it'll have all the same charm and appeal of an automat. It'll join ranks with the places that already prepare food such as frozen meat patties that are thawed and cooked by traveling down a heated conveyor belt.

      May as well stay home and make my own food for the cost of ingredients and watch TV just like always.

      I'm sure the cats enjoy having the company. ;)

    2. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      I don't eat at McDonalds because that's not 'food', it's 'food substitute', it's overpriced, undernourishing, and more or less complete garbage. I don't eat other so-called 'fast food' for similar reasons. There are few exceptions to this for me, those exceptions are few and far between, and when I do have to resort to it, the list of where is acceptable is painfully short, and I'm reminded at the pick-up window that what I'm paying for one pseudo-meal would pay for feeding me for several days otherwise, reinforcing all the above.

      I don't have cats, smartass. I don't have time to take care of one, it wouldn't be fair to the cat.

    3. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a joy to live and work with.

      Scratch that - you live alone, right?

      I'm guessing your coworkers don't invite you to lunch.

    4. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by iotaborg · · Score: 1

      This is more on the fast casual side, like Chipotle. Does it really matter if a human or a robot wraps the burrito? This isn't some Michelin star restaurant here. I'll gladly take the robots if it means better food quality, fewer mistakes, healthier options, etc. for the equivalent or lower price.

    5. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing this kitchen has over human workers is that it does not go to the bathroom. Because of that it will not handle your food without washing its hands after visiting the bathroom. Just for that reason I would go there over McDonalds. But it also has a potential to have fresher ingredients since the ingredients can be chopped every day and quickly fried before the meal. Contamination window is reduced.

    6. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to insult someone you could at least be less of a pussy about it and be logged in when you do it, or were you raised by women?

    7. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have cats, smartass. I don't have time to take care of one, it wouldn't be fair to the cat.

      Having a pet would detract from spreading your ego driven opinions on various websites for five hours a day.

    8. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Robots don't need to be to told to wash their hands after going to the bathroom, either.

    9. Re:Sounds like canned or frozen food to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haters gonna hate. xD xD xD
      Y U SO MAD THO??? xD xD xD

  14. Dirty dishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have one question: Is a human required to run the dishwasher station?

    The answer determines my sentiments about the whole concept.

    1. Re:Dirty dishes by iotaborg · · Score: 1

      Compostable or disposal bowls/forks, no dishes to clean.

  15. and if you don't tip the robo Chefs this happens by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  16. Cooks Not Chefs by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

    In large restaurants, chefs don't actually do the cooking. They plan the meals, order the food, and manage the staff. Chefs are actually managers.

    This restaurant likely still has a chef. Instead of managing a kitchen full of cooks, he or she manages robots.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Cooks Not Chefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, this "chef" has "managed" the restaurant equivalent of re-heating a frozen stouffer's stir fry.

    2. Re:Cooks Not Chefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes. That's the reason for the title, it's literally "head" as in "leader".

      But it's not quite a full description, since it tends to entail direct responsibility for the kitchen's output, which tends to require some direct input into the food preparation.

    3. Re:Cooks Not Chefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most restaurants are actually just doing that already - re-heating frozen food. If you ask to have something "without" and they say they can't, this is why.

      So better support restaurants that don't do this, ie. Indian restaurants and others where you know they build from scratch, and be a bit more patient and grateful for good food too!

    4. Re:Cooks Not Chefs by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
      But robots suck, I and many others aren't willing to pay restaurant prices to have what amounts to canned or frozen food, quality-wise. Where's the value-added of going to an actual sit-down restaurant? As someone else in this discussion said:

      Quite frankly I'd like to see them make a robot that could cook steak, potatoes, side veggies meal....because I'm quite certain they couldn't. Even a quality hamburger would confound a robot.

      I agree with this 100%. Otherwise it's more or less this.
      Do not want.

  17. Just wait until I order... by Jaegs · · Score: 3, Funny

    broccoli'); drop table vegetables;--

    1. Re:Just wait until I order... by WallyL · · Score: 1

      broccoli'); drop table vegetables;--

      Come on, don't be silly! Who orders broccoli?!

  18. Most restaurant meals aren't complex by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a lot of thought and effort goes into making them as quick and dirty as possible so you can "plate" them quickly and make the most profit. That's why most restaurants are built around meat. It freezes well and any idiot can cook it without ruining it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. Sous-vide by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Sous-vide accomplishes the same thing.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  20. You guys have no wokking experience. by bronney · · Score: 1

    There's a special move in stir-frying in a real wok, besides tossing and stirring. Once in a while you have to identify the uncooked bit of a meat and press it down with the tip of the spatula onto the bottom.

    Good luck getting diarrhea from AI uncooked chicken.

    1. Re:You guys have no wokking experience. by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      That's simply a matter of color recognition and force feedback interpretation.

  21. We had that already decades ago and it failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Automats were a thing and they fell before conventional fast food restaurants. Automated cooking has been tried and repeatably fails on quality, price, and convenience grounds. Hell vending machines are unable to compete with twenty four hour mini-marts on price and convenience! It is bizarre but unless there are major improvements labor elimination in restaurants will not succeed.

  22. Like bread making machines by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    For $60 at Walmart, you can get a bread maker, where all you do is dump in the ingredients (wait, that part isn't automatic???), push a button, and two hours later you have fresh baked bread. All you have to do is take it out and slice it (not automatic either).

    Maybe by some definition, bread makers are robots. These "robotic chefs" are robots by that same definition.

  23. Complaints about food quality by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    But if customers complain about the food, will the robots be able to prepare it again and spit in it out of spite?

  24. I Mean Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've sexed it up by including "Michelin-starred chef Daniel Boulud". But does anyone think this is going to be the commercial reality of robots in the kitchen? Not bloody likely!

    - You could see highly roboticized operations in a fast food joint. The limited choices, structured menus and low cost points all support that;
    - You could see specialized robots in fancier restaurants. Here I'm imagining them as a kind of limited sous-chef. Another reference point would be up-rated mixing machines, bread makers, rice cookers, that kind of thing, only with more responsibilities for producing a finished product.

    A robot is never gonna evaluate flavours, make new recipes, produce a budget and achieve profitable operation, or any of that. At least not anytime soon. Where current robots fail is in flexibility, creativeness, trading off multiple factors to achieve good outcomes, and all that. Worst of all robots cannot appreciate the food they make. A good chef loves food while a good robot is a dutiful follower of instructions.