Slashdot Mirror


Legend of Loch Ness Monster Will Be Tested With DNA Samples (apnews.com)

The stories seem as tall as the lake is deep. For hundreds of years, visitors to Scotland's Loch Ness have described seeing a monster that some believe lurks in the depths. But now the legend of "Nessie" may have no place left to hide. From a report: A New Zealand scientist is leading an international team to the lake next month, where they will take samples of the murky waters and conduct DNA tests to determine what species live there. University of Otago professor Neil Gemmell says he's no believer in Nessie, but he wants to take people on an adventure and communicate some science along the way. Besides, he says, his kids think it's one of the coolest things he's ever done. One of the more far-fetched theories is that Nessie is a long-necked plesiosaur that somehow survived the period when dinosaurs became extinct. Another theory is that the monster is actually a sturgeon or giant catfish. Many believe the sightings are hoaxes or can be explained by floating logs or strong winds.

75 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If nothing else comes from it, at least there will be a snapshot of the current level of biodiversity in the lake. Which could be useful for future planning if there is ever a algae bloom or other problem that arises. They could look back at the test and track where the problem first showed up.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The legend is more valuable than the truth; because you can sell the legend. It will be good to have a better understanding of the water's biodiversity, but I doubt it will have much impact on the legend. True believers will fin some conspiracy or mistake facts to argue their point, and the tourism council will continue to promote the monster.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If nothing else comes from it, at least there will be a snapshot of the current level of biodiversity in the lake. Which could be useful for future planning if there is ever a algae bloom or other problem that arises. They could look back at the test and track where the problem first showed up.

      How accurate is taking DNA samples from water though? Can you really take a sample of water and determine all the creatures that live there? I'm skeptical on how accurate this is. I certainly don't believe there is an actual Loch Ness Monster, but if there were, and their numbers were very low, how likely would you be to catch their DNA in a sample, in 10, in 100.

      Maybe the science for this is better than I suspect (I'm no expert) but this strikes me of fishing for Tuna in a back-yard pond.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > The legend is more valuable than the truth; because you can sell the legend.

      Yeah I don't know about that. I went to Loch Ness as part of a group tour and I was prepared to be inundated with Nessie this and Nessie that.

      I was very pleasantly surprised when I wasn't indundated with Nessie stuff. There is a little building that I think is also an inn, with a Nessie monster display, and that's about it. The narration on board a boat tour spent far more time talking about the real history of the region than monster sighting. Really, the whole Loch Ness Monster thing seemed to be an afterthought and not nearly as important as Urquhart Castle.

      And outside of that area the only time I saw Nessie-related things was solely in tourist trinket shops.

      It really feels like they are not trying hard to capitalise on this legend at all.

    4. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My quick search for information only found organizations testing for microbial life in water systems. Some of them claim to have 100% or higher* accuracy.

      *higher not garaunteed in realities where 100% means perfect accuracy

      He said his team will take 300 samples of water from different points around the lake and at different depths. They will filter the organic material and extract the DNA, he said, sequencing it by using technology originally created for the human genome project.

      He said the DNA results will then be compared against a database of known species. He said they should have answers by the end of the year.

      I would like to know if he has tested this method in an aquarium.

    5. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by shess · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If nothing else comes from it, at least there will be a snapshot of the current level of biodiversity in the lake. Which could be useful for future planning if there is ever a algae bloom or other problem that arises. They could look back at the test and track where the problem first showed up.

      How accurate is taking DNA samples from water though? Can you really take a sample of water and determine all the creatures that live there? I'm skeptical on how accurate this is. I certainly don't believe there is an actual Loch Ness Monster, but if there were, and their numbers were very low, how likely would you be to catch their DNA in a sample, in 10, in 100.

      Maybe the science for this is better than I suspect (I'm no expert) but this strikes me of fishing for Tuna in a back-yard pond.

      The biggest problem is that such a sampling expedition is going to find a lot of unknown DNA and a lot of ambiguous DNA, which is all you need to keep the legend rolling. You can't explain 100% of the DNA you find in a local puddle, much less a substantial body of water like this with relatively low through current.

    6. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If nothing else comes from it, at least there will be a snapshot of the current level of biodiversity in the loch."
       
      Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How accurate is taking DNA samples from water though?

      Depends. When did CowboyNeal last swim in the loch?

    8. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How accurate is taking DNA samples from water though?

      Come on, seriously. If scanners can detect one klingon life sign on an entire planet, a small water sample can show under DNA analysis every animal that's ever lived in a lake.

    9. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      How accurate is taking DNA samples from water though?

      When it comes to finding mythical monsters completely inaccurate. Anyone who really believes that there is a monster in Loch Ness is simply going to explain it away by e.g. claiming the monster is alien and doesn't have DNA. It's hard to argue against firmly held, irrational beliefs with rational, evidence-based arguments unless you can provide clear and direct evidence that explicitly contradicts those beliefs and not finding something is not going to do that.

    10. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by NeilAtWhartonSquare · · Score: 1

      it's a loch not a lake.

    11. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      We could drain the damn thing. Tag and categorize every fish and weed in the loch, and some fruit would still believe in a monster. Humans have an amazing capacity for self deception.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    12. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...True believers will fin some conspiracy...

      Subtle but on point - well played sir!

    13. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How accurate is taking DNA samples from water though?

      It's totally not.

      Scientific DNA analysis is way oversold, especially when commercial interests become involved. A friend of mine submitted a sample of her DNA to one of those ancestry services and was told 28% of her DNA is from Greenland. She is black and from Cape Town, South Africa.

    14. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

      Fair point. Neil Gemmell is a specialist in mitochondrial DNA. (I'm not, but I've co-authored with him.) So I expect they'll pick out any DNA which look like they are mitochondrial by using highly conserved mitochondrial genes, and then see how that mitochondria compares to known species. If all the mitochondria they find is closely related to known fish, snails, birds etc. then this is evidence against Nessie. If they find something unlike anything known but looks like it had a common ancestor with birds or crocodiles 250 million years ago, this would be evidence for Nessie.

      The general method is called metagenomics. You sequence everything, then compare the sequences to genbank, likely using the BLAST program. Any sequences which are very similar to a known sequence from genbank you conclude come from the same or similar organism to the one the genbank sequence came from. If you find a sequence which is quite close but not an exact match to lots of genbank mitochondrial sequences, that is when you might jump up and down and shout "Nessie!". (You might also get lucky with Nessie nuclear DNA.)

      This explanation is simplified, partly to keep it short, and partly because I haven't done any metagenomics myself so I only know a simplified version of it.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    15. Re:If nothing else, Biodiversity recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concentrations of environmental DNA (eDNA) reflect spawning salmon abundance at fine spatial and temporal scales
      https://static1.squarespace.com/static/519bcfc0e4b0de2d4d90356d/t/5ab12c50aa4a991774bbefd3/1521560659109/Tillotson_et_al_2018.pdf

      Fish environmental DNA is more concentrated in aquatic sediments than surface water
      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632071400442X

      The post-glacial colonization of fish populations can be dated with DNA in lake sediments.
      https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:967723/FULLTEXT01.pdf

      I only know this because a friend of mine is engaged in lake sediment research (tracking climate change)

  3. Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by sjbe · · Score: 1

    One of the more far-fetched theories is that Nessie is a long-necked plesiosaur that somehow survived the period when dinosaurs became extinct. Another theory is that the monster is actually a sturgeon or giant catfish. Many believe the sightings are hoaxes or can be explained by floating logs or strong winds.

    There is no giant monster. It's a nice little fun story based on no actual credible evidence but it does bring in tourism dollars. (gee wonder why they keep the story going... $$$) It's fed by the same sorts of idiots who buy into conspiracy theories, bigfoot sightings, and who forget what the U in UFO stands for. The notion that it could be some sort of plesiosaur is just absurd because there would have to be a population of them and that would be impossible to hide even in an ocean much less 7.5 km^3 of water. It's people seeing what they want to see. Nothing more.

    1. Re: Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      The notion that it could be some sort of plesiosaur is just absurd because there would have to be a population of them and that would be impossible to hide even in an ocean much less 7.5 km^3 of water.

      In real units, that's three million Olympic swimming pools, one of which contains a plesiosaur.

  4. Homeopathy About to Be Debunked. Pictures at 11! by moehoward · · Score: 2

    Oh, lord. You seriously think that we will finally put the lunatics to bed with a DNA test. And you seriously believe that they even believe in DNA.

    For god's(tm) sake, there is still a Flat Earth Society.

    Though I do sort of love it when smart people get trolled like this.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  5. it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The clue is in the name. Loch Ness. not Lake Ness. Scotand, famously only has one lake, the reast are Lochs although this is not strictly true.

    1. Re:it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, in France too they don't have any lakes as far as I'm aware. They don't even have rivers, They have plenty of lacs and rivieres though.

      Germany is also devoid of lakes, but is a few sees.

      The Netherlands, famous for water management, surprisingly has no lakes too but they do have meers.

      Spain has no lakes, but they have lagos!

      Shall I continue you pedantic fuck?

    2. Re:it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please continue, then maybe investigate why a Loch is not the same as a lake and come back and apologise to the poster you replied to.

    3. Re: it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lake, loch, tomatoe tomatoe.

    4. Re:it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Loch is just a gaelic word for lake. There is no fundamental difference between a loch and a lake.

    5. Re:it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loch (/lx/) is the Irish, Scottish Gaelic and Scots word for a lake or for a sea inlet.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch

      You plan on apologizing don't you? I mean since you and the OP are incorrect that there is an appreciable difference, it seems like you should both apologize for making a mountain out of a molehill.

    6. Re:it's a Loch not a lake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Loch (/lx/) is the Irish, Scottish Gaelic and Scots word for a lake or for a sea inlet.

      idiot

  6. The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that "Nessia" is an underwater submarine operation being conducted by the "deep state" in order to manipulate the fractious Scottish people into supporting the new and improved Monarchy.

  7. It's a cover story by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    In reality University of Otago professor Neil Gemmell is a Hydra agent and he's introducing a catfish virus that produces the super-soldier serum into the lake to breed an army of land locked weaponized catfish and to destabilize the Louisiana Gumbo hegemony. Otago is a secret country similar to Wakanda, that is the headquarters of Hydra. Neil Gemmell is professor of the Dark Arts at the university.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It's a cover story by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's well-known that Nessie doesn't have DNA anyway.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re: It's a cover story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I thought it was common knowledge. I was always told Nessy doesn't have any DNA. What are these folks noobs?

  8. Cultural exchange program by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    Nessie left for outer space to visit the Octopus world. Octopodes are just here until their semester ends.

    --
    -Dave
  9. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no giant monster. It's a nice little fun story based on no actual credible evidence but it does bring in tourism dollars

    And I'm not sure that he would disagree with you ...

    University of Otago professor Neil Gemmell says he's no believer in Nessie, but he wants to take people on an adventure and communicate some science along the way. Besides, he says, his kids think it's one of the coolest things he's ever done.

    In other words, no, he doesn't expect to find it, but he's going to do some interesting science, try to educate the public, and please his kids.

    Sounds like he's just being honest about it, and sneaking in some science for people.

  10. Re:Homeopathy About to Be Debunked. Pictures at 11 by chefren · · Score: 1

    Yeah and also aliens don't have DNA so it won't even register!

  11. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    One of the more far-fetched theories is that Nessie is a long-necked plesiosaur that somehow survived the period when dinosaurs became extinct. Another theory is that the monster is actually a sturgeon or giant catfish. Many believe the sightings are hoaxes or can be explained by floating logs or strong winds.

    There is no giant monster. It's a nice little fun story based on no actual credible evidence but it does bring in tourism dollars. (gee wonder why they keep the story going... $$$) It's fed by the same sorts of idiots who buy into conspiracy theories, bigfoot sightings, and who forget what the U in UFO stands for. The notion that it could be some sort of plesiosaur is just absurd because there would have to be a population of them and that would be impossible to hide even in an ocean much less 7.5 km^3 of water. It's people seeing what they want to see. Nothing more.

    I, don't disagree with you, but playing the Donald's advocate:

    What if there were some huge undocumented caves somewhere off the depths of the lake that contained something essential for the Pleiosaurs to survive. They don't normally leave the caves, but occasionally one does... they get sick, rise to the surface and get spotted by tourists before dying and sink to the bottom where they are eaten by fish and other organisms.

    Yeah, nonsense I know... but theoretically possible

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  12. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    The notion that it could be some sort of plesiosaur is just absurd because there would have to be a population of them and that would be impossible to hide even in an ocean much less 7.5 km^3 of water.

    Why would it need to be a population of them? You mean to tell me plesiosaurs don't have lifespans of a few million years? I'm shocked!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  13. Re:Homeopathy About to Be Debunked. Pictures at 11 by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Aliens do exist and they're all being used by the Japanese cartoon porn industry.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  14. Why? by binkless · · Score: 1

    Why bother.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to ask the same. The legendary picture was a bathing elephant.

    2. Re:Why? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Why bother.

      It's what this professor does anyway. That he can do it in Loch Ness and mention the monster to gain some headlines and perhaps some funding is just something to add spice to his normal research career.

  15. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by shess · · Score: 1

    I, don't disagree with you, but playing the Donald's advocate:

    What if there were some huge undocumented caves somewhere off the depths of the lake that contained something essential for the Pleiosaurs to survive. They don't normally leave the caves, but occasionally one does... they get sick, rise to the surface and get spotted by tourists before dying and sink to the bottom where they are eaten by fish and other organisms.

    Yeah, nonsense I know... but theoretically possible

    What if God just pops up to play with giant plesiosaur puppets periodically? I mean, seems unlikely, but theoretically possible.

  16. The price of the genetic testing by Dwedit · · Score: 2

    The price of the genetic testing will be about $3.50.

    1. Re:The price of the genetic testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price of the genetic testing will be about $3.50.

      So THAT'S why!

      PS - it's "tree fiddy", not "$3.50". Get it right.

  17. River Monsters by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Jeremy Wade checked it out.

    Lochness connects to the ocean and occasionally gets seals, sturgeon, killer whales and dolphins.

    Case closed.

    1. Re:River Monsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is it.
      Can someone please mod this up?
      Of course you're going to get weird ocean critters in there once every few years.

  18. Oblig. Bill Hicks on Nessie by Bearhouse · · Score: 1
  19. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    There's a conspiracy theory that many "extinct" animals and cryptozoology animals are actually just things which evolved the ability to become invisible. The mechanism is actually known - the company Quantum Stealth makes it, but it's virtually impossible to scale up (it requires chip fabrication technologies to make transistor-scale resonators at the wavelength of light over an entire surface of an object and/or through it. Interestingly, life is REALLY good at making nano-scale devices and taking advantage of quantum effects, Even the photosynthesis mechanism in all organisms capable of drawing energy from the sun utilizes the same effect in the Quantum Stealth technology to a lesser degree. If there were a gene to make proteins which function as those quantum resonators at the right wavelength and it got transposed into the spot for melanin you'd absolutely get an invisible creature (at least at visible wavelengths.) That theory suggests that the Bigfoot creatures and such seen are those with a pigment deficiency akin to albinism leading to a lack of the cloaking protein.

  20. Re: Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be entropy in action. Unlikely but possible.

    Could also be a secret portal to The Land That Time Forgot.

  21. Re:Geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The butthurt is strong with this one.

  22. DNA sample? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    So if they catch one, thwy will be able to identify it.

    I think he's got a better chance of winning lotto

  23. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by aevan · · Score: 2

    Ah, but what if they were capable of parthenogenesis, but only one of their clutch survives siblicide (low resources driving it) to reach adulthood, which is assured as their natural predators died out millions of years ago. Then one day the young supplants the old and the cycle continues - Nessie is dead, Long Live Nessie....

    The original Loch Ness Monster has been expired 15 megannum, and is rotting like a corpse in Patagonia~

  24. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

    I, don't disagree with you, but playing the Donald's advocate:

    What if there were some huge undocumented caves somewhere off the depths of the lake that contained something essential for the Pleiosaurs to survive. They don't normally leave the caves, but occasionally one does... they get sick, rise to the surface and get spotted by tourists before dying and sink to the bottom where they are eaten by fish and other organisms.

    Yeah, nonsense I know... but theoretically possible

    What if God just pops up to play with giant plesiosaur puppets periodically? I mean, seems unlikely, but theoretically possible.

    Not theoretically possible because he doesn't exist.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  25. They are not they dislike it by aepervius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last time I was there I friended a few locals at a pub, and the gist of it is that they dislike all nessie stuff, and think it overshadow their region and its history. Basically if you talk to the local they will barely mention it, some don't even do (and if you DO mention it you get the "tourist idiot" stamp and they won't talk to you). There are a few selling trinkets but you speak to most local, you pretty much the impression Nessie's story is a plague. As for "100 of years" that is a load of BS. There is a few story here and there and some hint at a very small monster (human sized roughly) but in reality until start of the 20th century (about 1930-1940) you pretty much have zero tradition of it. It only exploded with the Surgeon hoax photo.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  26. Re:America, Explained on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me, what American town is University of Otago in?

  27. Re: Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    That's dumb. Obviously they're aliens, and the ones who get spotted are the poor sods whose personal cloaking devices ran out of batteries.

    "Albinism" indeed!

  28. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Solandri · · Score: 2

    Statistics favor there being no Loch Ness monster. Back in the latter half of the 1900s, about 100,000 people visited the lake each year. Only a few percent of them had cameras, and almost none of them had video cameras.

    In the 2010s, about 200,000 people visited the lake each year. And nearly all of them had cameras with video capability. So statistically, you'd expect the number of photos purporting to show Nessie each year to have increased by about 100-fold, and the number of videos (i.e. mysterious ripples on the surface) to have increased 1000- or 10,000-fold.

    No such increases have happened (and in fact the photographer of the most famous photo from the 1900s has come out and admitted he faked it). That makes it highly likely that there is no monster, and that most of the "sightings" in the 1900s were faked.

  29. Re:America, Explained on Slashdot by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    New Zealand scientists in Scotland are there to prove American culture is right.

  30. Re:Homeopathy About to Be Debunked. Pictures at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even he admits this, its an excuse to take a vacation to Scotland, probably on someone else's dime.

  31. Champ by Topwiz · · Score: 2

    Lake Champlain supposedly has a monster known as Champ. The story is that Samuel de Champlain saw it when he first discovered the lake.

    I saw something suspicious in two nearby lakes, Lake George in New York and Lake Bomoseen in Vermont. What at first appeared like a large creature with humps was actually several pike or sturgeon travelling nose to tail just barely under the surface.

  32. Re:Homeopathy About to Be Debunked. Pictures at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll never get anyone to agree on a single topic ever, especially one as well wrapped in mystery and myth. So why are you giving that kind of thought even a single second of your consideration? Be stoic about it and understand that some people are going to go against the evidence just to go against the evidence. It might not be a good thing (although a lot of progress has been made by questioning the norm through time) but it's going to be ok.

    As for the flat erathers? That's mostly what it is, a trolling. Again, let it go. We have more of a problem with people who think they understand science but really don't than those who thumb their nose at science or use it as a form of mockery. I had just seen one of many Facebook groups yesterday that was trying to pass itself off as a science group that had meme after meme with no backing articles that were nothing more than propaganda aimed at a bunch of know-nothings who are desperate to come off as learned people and sway their political position on any matter by mixing a bit of "sciencey" nonsense with blunt statements about politics. Each posting was getting thousands of likes even though not a single one had any worthwhile content. That's the danger here. I've seen it while doing public science outreach, I've seen it in educational situations and I've seen it in supposed protests about scientific matters. The would-be nerds are many and they're very vocal and they're (normally) very wrong about the science but they're too misinformed to know how wrong they really are.

  33. Re:America, Explained on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because no other country has ever elected a shitty leader. If anything this makes the U.S. more European than anything else in recent history.

  34. Re: Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not necessarily because you are presupposing that the Loch Ness monsters behavior wouldn't change. Perhaps these creatures have survived by being very shy and elusive and if there are more tourists with eager camera snapping behavior, they just might stay below the surface. Or, global warming is causing them to not surface much anymore, etc.

    Although, I agree with you more than the argument above.

  35. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

    What if there were some huge undocumented caves somewhere off the depths of the lake that contained something essential for the Pleiosaurs to survive. They don't normally leave the caves, but occasionally one does... they get sick, rise to the surface and get spotted by tourists before dying and sink to the bottom where they are eaten by fish and other organisms.

    Yeah, nonsense I know... but theoretically possible

    Pleiosaurs breath air. Sure, they might hang out in caves a lot of the time for a food supply, but underwater caves make for uncomfortable breathing conditions for a large animal, even if a few happen to have air.

    There is an actual good explanation for the legends, which boil down to credible reports of surprising waves on apparently windless days. The loch is basically a very long and very straight lake. If there were a very gentle and steady breeze, the entire lake could be "tilted" by the wind -- imperceptible to the observer, but there would be some amount of energy stored by gravity. What happens if the wind suddenly stops? You can get unexpectedly large waves propagating down miles of lake, waves that might be difficult to perceive one place but easy to see a mile down. From the observers point of view, the wind change from nothing to nothing, and, lo and behold! big waves appeared over there. Waves so big and sudden that the "only" explanation is a large animal.

  36. Tall Stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they're "tall tales"...

  37. Crikey.... by vague+disclaimer · · Score: 1

    ....I didn't know shadows and reflections had DNA.

  38. All things MUST GO on Ebay by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    There has never been a better time to buy your Nessie stuffed sea creature collection, bauble-head memorabilia, creepy DNA ("not to be mistaken for genuine DNA from any mythical undersea creatures") VHS tapes of Bigfoot claiming to witness an 'up-close-and-personal' encounter with the creature

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  39. Nessie Alliance responds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir Curt Godfrey of the Nessie Alliance summoned the help of Scotland's local wizards to cast a protective spell over the lake and its residents, and all those who seek a peaceful existence with our underwater ally.

  40. What if it uses RNA? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Nessie never was DNA compliant ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  41. Giant by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I doubt anything could be found, but if we imagine a giant specimen of an endogenous species, DNS sampling would not reveal anything of interest.

  42. Re:Let it go. There is no Loch Ness monster. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    There is no giant monster.

    True. It's not that big. Barely the size of an elephant.

  43. Re:Geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha, +1 funny! I came here to post something similar and it is the first thing I thought about when reading the title ;-)

    I might have posted about the Creim Ness monster or something but you obviously beat me to it FCLM!

    -Cheers,