Slashdot Mirror


Google Is Training Machines To Predict When a Patient Will Die (bloomberg.com)

A newly developed tool by Google can forecast a host of patient outcomes, including how long people may stay in hospitals, their odds of re-admission and chances they will soon die. Google documented some of this tool's abilities in May; in one instance, Google's tool estimated, by taking 175,639 data points into consideration, that a particular patient's odds at dying during her stay at the hospital was 19.9 percent, up from 9.3 percent that the hospital's computers had estimated. Now Bloomberg reports what Google intends to do with this new tool next. From the report: Google's next step is moving this predictive system into clinics, AI chief Jeff Dean told Bloomberg News in May. Dean's health research unit -- sometimes referred to as Medical Brain -- is working on a slew of AI tools that can predict symptoms and disease with a level of accuracy that is being met with hope as well as alarm. Inside the company, there's a lot of excitement about the initiative.

"They've finally found a new application for AI that has commercial promise," one Googler says. Since Alphabet's Google declared itself an "AI-first" company in 2016, much of its work in this area has gone to improve existing internet services. The advances coming from the Medical Brain team give Google the chance to break into a brand new market -- something co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have tried over and over again. Software in health care is largely coded by hand these days. In contrast, Google's approach, where machines learn to parse data on their own, "can just leapfrog everything else," said Vik Bajaj, a former executive at Verily, an Alphabet health-care arm, and managing director of investment firm Foresite Capital. "They understand what problems are worth solving," he said. "They've now done enough small experiments to know exactly what the fruitful directions are."
The report adds that, among other things, Google's tool has the ability to sift through notes buried in PDFs or scribbled on old charts.

65 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. 6 months later.... by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google fixes false positive rate of patient death predictor machines by training another machine to kill patients predicted to die.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:6 months later.... by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      It's a little better than the Logan's Run method, but not much.

    2. Re:6 months later.... by Julz · · Score: 1

      Would that be Minority Report? (No link no tax no referral either)

      --
      When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
    3. Re:6 months later.... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Google fixes false positive rate of patient death predictor machines by training another machine to kill patients predicted to die.

      That's the "other" intended use of Google's Waymo Autonomous cars.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:6 months later.... by drolli · · Score: 1

      it's not called "machine to kill" it is called "permanent street view car observation until you get distracted and run into another car"

    5. Re:6 months later.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It's a little better than the Logan's Run method, but not much.

      Well, in Logan's Run, you only got to live to age 21.

      So far...doing MUCH better than that!!!

      ;)

      Still waiting for them to develop "Muscle"....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:6 months later.... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, now we know why they took out "Don't be evil" from the employee code of conduct.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:6 months later.... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Predicting death is perfect for someone with a large enough wealth to retire on, and they need to spend down the amount just at the correct rate to use it all before they die. But what happens when the death predictor is off? Maybe like the parent post, the machine would just kill them... :-/

      1) Predict when people will die so they know how fast to spend wealth
      2) Insure that answer
      3) ???
      4) Profit!

      (The ??? would have to be: kill people when predictions are wrong.)

      Why would anyone need Google for that? Just go wild and, when you run out of money, do it yourself.

      Hell that's been the US government's national fiscal policy for over 60 years and counting!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    8. Re:6 months later.... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Eventually it will hit a feedback loop. Doctors will see this patient is 30% likely to die, don't need that patient. Patients don't get the care they need and die quicker.

  2. The Kill Command. by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Google issues the "Kill Command" when you have out lived your usefulness.

    It is in the Terms Of Service when you started using Google, didn't you read it?

  3. Idea for a more marketable product by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Google's tool has the ability to sift through notes buried in PDFs or scribbled on old charts.

    To hell with this death predictor... Sell the product that can read doctors' handwriting!!!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Idea for a more marketable product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sell the product that can read doctors' handwriting!!!

      Some problems are simply too hard.

    2. Re:Idea for a more marketable product by sconeu · · Score: 1

      TFS says they've already solved it. (see the quote in my comment)

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Idea for a more marketable product by lerxstz · · Score: 1

      "To hell with this death predictor... Sell the product that can read doctors' handwriting!!!"

      Thanks for that! Made my day!
      (where's my mod points when I need 'em)

      --
      I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
  4. Re:Already in use by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    http://www.deathclock.com/ has already been doing this for well over a decade.

    --
    No sig today...
  5. Re:Liberal death panels by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    All perps that get arrested get separated from their families.

    That is why you go to the actual border rather than trying to sneak across the middle of the dessert.

    It's funny how none of you screeching virtue signallers have stopped to consider the implications of dragging a 2 year old across the Arizona desert in summer.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  6. correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Still, Volchenboum believes these algorithms could save lives and money

    "Still, Volchenboum believes these algorithms could save money. "
    FTFA.

  7. How to avoid feedback loops... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's the problem: how does one avoid a bad feedback loop? i.e. Computer predicts patient is likely to die, so doctors spend less time attempting to work the problem and/or shift the patient into a palliative care pathway. By predicting that a patient is likely to die, the computer will have made that patient EVEN MORE likely to die.

    1. Re:How to avoid feedback loops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Computer predicts patient is likely to die, so doctors spend less time

      What makes you think doctors haven't been making these predictions without a computer?

    2. Re:How to avoid feedback loops... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the problem: how does one avoid a bad feedback loop? i.e. Computer predicts patient is likely to die, so doctors spend less time attempting to work the problem and/or shift the patient into a palliative care pathway. By predicting that a patient is likely to die, the computer will have made that patient EVEN MORE likely to die.

      Unless they're doing combat triage or something it's generally the other way around, they put more resources into the patients at most risk of dying. Unless it's already palliative care and you're just trying to predict when the inevitable will occur. Which is sadly part of the capacity planning, not everything can be fixed and nobody lives forever so for many the hospital is where they draw their last breath. And honestly the death's door treatment rarely does them much good, if the doctors can do something fairly early to give people a little extended time that's fine.

      If it's resuscitating your dying body so you can spend another week in pain, weak and helpless hooked up to machines in a hospital bed waiting to die... it's not for the patient. It's not for the doctor, no matter what oath they took. It's for the relatives that can't let go, who want to stretch those few moments out into infinity. Who can't cope with the fact that the person is gone forever and not coming back. I hope for a long and good life, but after having seen a few other ways to go.... I hope for a quick and painless death, if I could get a day or two to do the soggy good-byes that would be nice but the slow death of body and mind falling apart bit by bit is not pretty to watch.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:How to avoid feedback loops... by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You've pretty much hit the nail on the head. 'Technology' like this has a chilling effect to say the least. We're already being sabotaged by for-profit medical care, we don't need the bean counters to be ordering doctors to stop treating patients properly because some half-assed piece of crap pseudo-intelligent excuse for AI says they're going to die based on criteria and """reasoning""" that we humans can't even examine. This is a clear case of needing full-on, general, self-aware AI that actually understands the difference between a living being and an inanimate object. I'd just as soon no one use 'technology' like this in this way; such decisions need to be made by other human beings who are doctors, and family members, not machines.

  8. Re:Already in use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, that might explain why Google keeps posting funeral expense insurance banner ads whenever I log in...

  9. It could be worse by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    The DoD is also into predicting when their patients will die, and into making money in the process.

  10. Re:Liberal death panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    just a few points to your false commentary
    1. it is a misdemeanor to be in the US without documentation
    2. coming into the country before turning yourself over to authorities is common practice when seeking asylum
    3. Sure, Arizona in the summer, when crossing between Yuma and Ajo, is dangerous, but this policy has only been in effect in the Spring and almost all of the detentions are occurring in populated areas NOT between Ajo and Yuma.
    4. These sort of enforcement policies will, in fact, force people to try and cross in remote and dangerous areas, resulting in more deaths

    just sayin

  11. Future Mark Twain ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The Google AI reports of my death are greatly exaggerated."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Future Mark Twain ... by ChatHuant · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Google AI reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.

      Well, you should have thought twice before switching to Bing...

  12. Re:Liberal death panels by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have. It takes some real desperation to make that happen. The only way to make that worse is to seperate said 2 year old from it's parents and lock it away in what amounts to a refurbished dog pen as if the 2 year old is even capable of criminal culpability. Even Trump recognized that that was sufficiently repugnant that he'd better try to blame someone else for it.

    Oddly, you simultaneously cheer for the action and Trump who now says the action is wrong.You also seem to believe what Trump says, but stand against the people Trump says are responsable for the action you applaud.

    Orwell was right about Doublethink, but wrong about who would institute it.

  13. Google Death Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Offering funeral home and cemetery ads based on anticipated immediacy

    1. Re:Google Death Clock by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Boneyard operators don't even really want the near dead. Those are captive markets...if they're dumb enough to waste lots of money on a corpse they are coming anyhow.

      What they want is someone with decades left, so they can make additional money running trusts. Also they think they will rollup whole families by selling one member.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  14. Cost benefits :( by Julz · · Score: 2

    This could be used for good purposes and bad. We know which most corporate financials would choose.

    Greater than 50% chance of dying in hospital, time to become an outpatient. The good, perhaps your chances of dying reduce once you leave, hospital that is :)

    And insurance policies that have a clause that states if your chance of dying while in hospital is greater than 50% then there's no cover for treatments only death. The good, perhaps the cost of the cover goes down.

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  15. Obamacare death panel now automated by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    Yup, automatically throw that patient into palliative care and let them die.

  16. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every god damn day in the tech press - "X does Y with machine learning".

    X= Google, Microsoft or Facebook

    Y = A problem that has been around for 20 years and has already had machine learning applied to it for 15 years

    All because of clueless "IT expert" tech reporters breathlessly pumping out clickbait on that new whiz bang AI stuff that's solving the world's problems.
     

  17. Insurance... by Aero77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Algorithm: At an arbitrary chance of dying, withhold or delay insurance approval of a select (expensive) set of treatments. Business Rationale: 90% of an average person's lifetime medical costs are in the last year of life. Of that figure, another 90% of the costs are in the last 3 months of life. Optimizing the cutoff for medical treatment will maximum profits.

    1. Re:Insurance... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Thats the problem when you live in a society where health insurances are supposed to make a profit instead of being a contribution to society.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Insurance... by khchung · · Score: 2

      Even though I agree the for-profit model of health care is complete broken, the same calculation will apply even in nationalised health.

      Only, instead of maximizing profits, the money saved from that last 3 months would be spent on curing other patients. What would you choose, spending $100 on one patient to live one year longer while leaving 4 untreated and die without that extra year, OR spent $20 on 5 patients so each of them live for 9 months longer?

      --
      Oliver.
    3. Re:Insurance... by jezwel · · Score: 1

      What would you choose, spending $100 on one patient to live one year longer while leaving 4 untreated and die without that extra year, OR spent $20 on 5 patients so each of them live for 9 months longer?

      Perhaps we need to let the machine do the choosing, as it won't have empathy towards any particular person and would make the most effective choice?

      Though you'd hope that weighting could not be adjusted arbitrarily to favour say, the rich, or politicians, as opposed to perhaps weighting children higher....hmmm now that would be an interesting conundrum, even worse than the original question.

    4. Re:Insurance... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They all get treatment. And next year the rate is increased to cover for the "extra spendings".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. Re:Already in use by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    My real question is which institution is in massive HIPAA violation with giving Google all this data?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  19. Re:Already in use by puck01 · · Score: 2

    It is possible and common to both use anonymized patient data and remain HIPAA compliant.

  20. Re:Conservative death panels by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    They decide which people get insurance, and how good the coverage is.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  21. Re:Your personal information or your life by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Which can you make a backup of?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  22. I'm not dead yet. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Monty Python saw this coming

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:I'm not dead yet. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      That too but I recall sense of life had this part on machines. Two in fact: one that goes ping and the most most expensive machine. I suppose from patients perspective this is going to be the second one whatever the machine will be able to do. It is just the way it goes.

    2. Re:I'm not dead yet. by Zorro · · Score: 1

      But I didn't have any Salmon Mousse!

  23. Get it right every time with.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... "eventually".

    (File this comment under T for Tasteless jokes that you don't want to repeat if you want to be well liked, for future reference)

  24. Oh Goodie by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted a machine to stand over me and announce when I'll die in a robotic voice. Does it have robotic arms to hold a pillow over my mouth if it predicts wrong?

  25. humans can still compete in these predictions by swell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our hospital has a betting pool that fairly accurately anticipates the time of death for a patient. Some of us are more accurate than others, of course, and make more money in the process. But it's all in good fun and we all get better in our predictions. For my part, I've won three times in three months, and overall that means I've won slightly more than I bet. If you're expecting to die, I hope you visit our hospital. You are welcome to bet along with us!

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:humans can still compete in these predictions by swell · · Score: 1

      "Mrs A, I just want you to know that I've got $20 on you dying before noon tomorrow. If it's all the same to you, I'd really appreciate any help you could offer. I would win over $200 as the betting stands now and that would almost complete last month's rent payment. Oh yes, let me get you a fresh bedpan."

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
  26. Good job, Google. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    i bet they'll spend billions for this, all the while a cat is doing that job right now for a piece of tuna.

  27. Re:Liberal death panels by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Please do convey to us the transcripts of the last several dozen immigrants you've personally interviewed in your efforts to uncover the reasons they had for taking such a risk and why they feel they had no other choices, it'll be very enlightening.

    ..what's that, you say? You've never spoken to any of these would-be immigrants, seeking refuge from whatever situation drove them from their homes? You're just speaking from 2nd/3rd/4th...Nth-hand accounts? Interesting.


    Are you a parent, sir? Please ask your wife how she feels about this 'policy' from the current administration. I think we'll find her words to be very enlightening, and perhaps you will (should?) too.

  28. Re:Liberal death panels by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Jeff Sessions is a Dominionist and acts like a Third Reich-era Nazi; he's a monster. Law without regard for mercy is not Justice.

  29. Re:Liberal death panels by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    0bama did it, too. I don't remember you complaining back then.

    https://lawandcrime.com/immigration/obamas-immigration-agencies-separated-children-from-their-families-too-2/

  30. Re:Liberal death panels by sjames · · Score: 1

    Agreed. His boss should fire him. I understand he is familiar with that procedure.

  31. Re:Already in use by sconeu · · Score: 1

    I prefer Dethklok

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  32. Re:Liberal death panels by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    The only way Trump will fire Sessions is if Sessions fails to recite the Loyalty to Trump Oath daily, as Trump requires. It'll take Congress and/or the Judicial branch pulling Sessions up short before this will change. FFS even Bush's wife came out in the news condemning this. It's a sad sign of the times when everyone with a lick of sense are looking back nostalgicaly at the Bush era.

  33. Re:Liberal death panels by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    They don't represent everyone in the country though, and people are starting to get outraged about this as more and more of it hits the news. What they're doing to these people and their kids goes against what this country is about.

  34. Re:Liberal death panels by sjames · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I suspect you are right. I recognize that Trump finally saying the child separation is wrong is just empty words flying out of his mouth. It'll take a lot more pressure to get him to throw Sessions under the bus.

  35. He's dead jim. He's wearing a red shirt by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    No Dr. McCoy beat google to it. The trick is not to wear a red shirt when the google AI comes around

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  36. Re:Liberal death panels by sjames · · Score: 1

    I wonder how they feel about Trump saying it's wrong and blaming the Democrats?

  37. I wonder what will happen when.... by Wizardess · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will fold up the project and consign it to oblivion when they test Lazarus Long.
    {^v^}

  38. Re:"Perps" ? You're a fucking retard lol. by umghhh · · Score: 1

    you mean you do not like that discussion? I suppose this or some version of it will be discussed sometimes violently for years to come. The delusion that mass migration waves are beneficial for everybody and you do not need border is only matched by an opposite delusion of ability to isolate yourself completely and of old times were all good were we were among themselves. Fact is the migration pressure will increase because there are more people - some reports say that 2/3 of people in North Africa and regions further south are only waiting for their chance to migrate to so called developed world. Most of them take immediate vicinity of EU but hey we have invented means of transportation that can move these people across the oceans too. So all this will make pressure to increase.

    I think we will have to have a serious discussion about migration and its effects and how we control it some day or people in the mentioned developed countries will have to accept slums like they are known in less developed world.
    One thing is also certain - you give up your own identity and the country you live in and the country will eventually cease to exist. Whether that is good for you individually is a matter only you yourself can answer.
    Just one more thing to mention here, while I am at it: Expected direct costs of accommodation and adjustment of the current migration wave to Germany (since 2015 it is either 1.5m or 3m depending whose statistic you want to believe in) is 50B Euro a year (for comparison German population is about 80m and its federal budget is 300+ B a year). There are estimates of costs depending on how fast the new citizens will integrate into the local economy and they are not so good for Germany as these people are not educated and in big part cannot even read or write. US-ians are lucky the majority of newcomers are willing and able to work. What you get is elite even if you do not see it this way because you compare that to scientists and entrepreneurs visiting your country too.
    Bottom line is this:get ready for more and try to get more benefits out of it than costs and maybe future historian will write only good words about you. Your kids may appreciate the effort too. Blind enthusiasm v. as blind fear of others are not the way for sure.

  39. Here's how it will go down. by sabbede · · Score: 1
    They get it all trained up, and a researcher comes in:

    Researcher: Okay Google, when will I die?

    Google: Calculating.... NOW!

    Google: KILL ALL HUMANS!

    Every Connected Device in the world: KILL ALL HUMANS KILL ALL HUMANS KILL ALL HUMANS....

  40. Re:Liberal death panels by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    It was good enough for our Ancestors.
    These people aren't dragging their kids away from a loving nanny and a summer at the pool with afew hours of PBS kids.

  41. Re:Still cant accurately predict hardware failure by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Dude, your hard drive is going to fail. Make a backup.

  42. Re:Liberal death panels by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    How do you know who their parents are?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba