Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo and Microsoft Team Up To Promote Cross-Play, While Sony Remains Silent (theverge.com)

Minecraft for the Nintendo Switch is getting a big update today that will enable cross-play with PC, Xbox One, and smartphones -- but notably not the PlayStation 4. "Sony is blocking cross-play for Fortnite, Rocket League, and Minecraft so PS4 players can't play against Xbox One or Nintendo Switch owners," reports The Verge. "Meanwhile, Nintendo and Microsoft are partnering to utilize cross-play as a marketing weapon today." From the report: The Minecraft cross-play trailer specifically focuses on the Xbox One and Nintendo Switch being able to play together. It also includes the rare sight of an Xbox One controller in a Switch commercial. If that's not enough of a partnership, the ad even encourages players to create, explore, and survive together in Minecraft on Xbox One and Nintendo Switch.

75 comments

  1. Cross-Play? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Uh, I hope they know what "cross-play" means.

    I promise to actually pay for my copy of Microsoft Office if Gates or Nadella put that on. Deal?

  2. Are we sure it's a good idea? by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

    What happened to the competitive advantage of one system over another; isn't it bad to mix players from different systems? I remember PC players having a huge advantage over console players in the past. I haven't played fortnite, it's not my type of game, so why is it different?

    1. Re:Are we sure it's a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. I think most of the advantage is in having a Mouse so a console could just add support for that.

      2. it is Minecraft. That means, I suspect, the advantage is not as pronounced as it would be in more conventional, fast-paced, FPS.

      3. It's Minecraft - the emphasis is on co-operative everything against the environment (PvE), rather than PvP. That means that PC advantages over Console simply mean the PC people are more capable, not that they beat the console players. It isn't a competition.

      (Imagine something like Civilization - the advantage of a mouse just makes your turns easier for you to input; but doesn't actually put you at a disadvantage as speed of input doesn't affect the game.)

      So, yes, I think in PvP FPSs, I think you've got a point. In slower paced games and PvE, I suspect it's a lot less of a deal.

    2. Re: Are we sure it's a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony is the only one blocking Tekken cross-platform multiplayer. And people usually get a pad or arcade style controller for that. Usually those work on 1 system + PC but some do 2 Xb1 and PS4 + PC.

    3. Re:Are we sure it's a good idea? by dohzer · · Score: 1

      If they do add keyboard and mouse support, then how am I meant to keep hating on consoles? Surely inferior hardware isn't enough of a reason alone.

    4. Re:Are we sure it's a good idea? by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      Many games already have matchmaking algorithms that try to pit players with similar skill level against each other. It probably doesn't matter whether a skill difference is caused by practice or by using a superior input method.

    5. Re:Are we sure it's a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the games have to support keyboard and mouse too. They also need to have totally rebindable controls.

      Games consoles are passe. You can buy a PC for around the same price that can do way better graphics, plus you can use it for millions of other things that consoles can't do too.

    6. Re:Are we sure it's a good idea? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      What happened to the competitive advantage of one system over another; isn't it bad to mix players from different systems? I remember PC players having a huge advantage over console players in the past. I haven't played fortnite, it's not my type of game, so why is it different?

      Well, I suspect the rounds are so short that in the end the advantage gets pretty small. Plus, platform differences mustn't be a huge deal, because you apparently can play with just a touchscreen on mobile. So I suspect on a lot of modern games, it really doesn't matter. Plus I'm sure Microsoft and even Nintendo will allow mouse and keyboard soon enough if they need to.

      However, this cross marketing could be very interesting - Microsoft never really had a portable system, and Nintendo was generally lacking on the home console department. I suspect this could lead to interesting developments since Microsoft and Nintendo have a system the other lacks. If it succeeds, I still thing we'll have two separate companies, but we may get some interesting intermingling of games and services - Microsoft providing the home console and online network Nintendo never could build (Super Smash Bros, Mario Kart and Mario Party on Microsoft, anyone? Online play and cross play with Switch). And likewise, we'd probably see a bunch of interesting portable gaming - Halo on Switch would be fairly intriguing, with cross play to home console users.

    7. Re: Are we sure it's a good idea? by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The thing about games with rebindable controls is that sometimes they don't bother even coming up with a reasonable default. That's when they lose me.

  3. PS4 won this generation by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    by leaps and bounds. The Switch and XBox are playing catch up so it's too their advantage right now to support cross play. If the position was reversed either way they'd be the ones blocking cross play while the other two allowed it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:PS4 won this generation by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can pretty much count on whichever console maker is in the lead to act like a raging a-hole. You should have seen the way Sony treated developers during the PS2 heyday. They would basically dictate design decisions, even on third party titles. Oh, but if you were developing a PSP title, they were your best buddy, of course, because Nintendo was still kicking their asses in the handheld market.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:PS4 won this generation by PingSpike · · Score: 1
      The situation was reversed last generation, and Microsoft acted exactly the same as Sony.
      https://www.engadget.com/2012/...

      In the Microsoft spokesman response:

      We have a high level of expectation for our game developers to ensure that all Live experiences remain top notch. Because we can't guarantee this level of quality, or control the player experience on other consoles or gaming networks, we currently do not open our network to games that allow this cross-over capability.

    3. Re:PS4 won this generation by nmo.marques · · Score: 0

      And now with PS4 which removed all the standards and allowed indie gamed the quality of titles is trash. Even big studios like Bungie release half baked products. I hope SONY remains strong in their view. Nintendo is a walking corpse. Microsoft is the powerhouse of trash talkers and cheaters. No, we dont want to play with them.

    4. Re:PS4 won this generation by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Not really sure that's true with the Switch. It's much newer so has had less time to embed, plus arguably operates in a different segment to the PS4.and XBox. Am not really sure a direct comparison is there to be made.

    5. Re:PS4 won this generation by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Which was complete BS back then to. All those Call of Duty games were running off peer to peer. They had no way to guarantee quality of connections.

    6. Re:PS4 won this generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. PS3 and 360 sales were neck and neck at about 80 million units each. Of course with the 360, half of those were repurchases due to extremely common hardware failures such as RROD.

  4. it's not just cross-play.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    sony blocks use of a game's player account on any other platform. even without cross play. want to use your fortnite account that's linked to ps4 account on a different platform... or move to it completely... even though you can't cross play? 'fuck you', says sony. all that progress and all those cosmetics, etc you bought are going to sit and rot on the ps4 if you want to switch.

    cross play is secondary. THIS is the main gripe players have. not being able to move their shit from one platform to another.. when the game developer otherwise permits such a move. some don't (because there may be competitive differences or advantages between platforms) but many do or would.

    1. Re:it's not just cross-play.. by FFOMelchior · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod parent up. Lack of cross-play is nothing new. This is erupting now due to the Epic/Fortnite account locks that Sony places. Login once on PS4, and without any warning, your 3rd party Epic account is now locked to Sony. Doesn't matter what you bought/unlocked -- you can't ever use any of that again on PC/Xbox/Switch.

    2. Re: it's not just cross-play.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It works fine on PC, as I can attest to. The initial article announcing it also stated that they could log on to XBOX just fine.

      What you cannot do is:
      1- party with anyone not on PC or PS4
      2- ever log on in switch

      The first is dumb, the second is disgusting.

    3. Re:it's not just cross-play.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh you can move the stuff. You can move it from the Switch or Xbox TO your Playstation account. But just like a shitty marriage expect to end up in court if you want to leave again.

    4. Re:it's not just cross-play.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep that's it, Sony did some free contact for ps+ members so I signed in 1 time to see what it was like and get the content now i cant use my account on any other system. Got a Switch and was looking to play with some friends while I was traveling... nope piss on you. Played 1 match and unlinking wont fix it either it's really stupid for something that gave 0 notice

    5. Re:it's not just cross-play.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can blame Sony all you want, they are certainly dicks for doing it... but they can't do it without EPIC games, so perhaps throw some hate their way too.

  5. This is going to be bad... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    ... for the console players until the console producers start making mouse & keyboard peripherals for them.

    Without out that, all the console 12yr olds are going to get slaughtered by people using PCs with mouse and keyboard

    1. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just plug in any USB mouse and keyboard into at least Xbox and PS4. The question is whether that partticular game developer lets it work. Final Fantasy 14, for instance, works normally.

    2. Re:This is going to be bad... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

      all the console 12yr olds are going to get slaughtered by people using PCs with mouse and keyboard

      Wrong. All the 15-year-olds using PCs who have dedicated six months to mastering a specific game are going to slaughter everyone.

      This is how online gaming has always worked... but now they just trash-talk you through a voice pitch changer.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re: This is going to be bad... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      And Final Fantasy XIV is one of those rare PS4/PC cross-platform game.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because no one at Sony cares about people still playing one of the worst MMOs ever launched, especially nearly a decade after it launched. I'm sure that if it were a game anyone cared about playing, Sony would block it in an instant.

    5. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFXIV is a freakin' fantastic MMO.

      And while MMO subscriber numbers are hard to get these days, FFXIV appears to be #2. They had 10 million players at the Stormblood launch - not far off WoW's 12 million all-time high.

      FFXIV is huge. Over 11 million characters connected in June. The number of players will be somewhat smaller than the number of characters, but since FFXIV allows one character to be every class alts aren't as common as they are in other games.

    6. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh. That's why when you Google "MMO" it doesn't even appear on the list. Instead you get MMOs like World of Warcraft, Guild Wars 2, Black Desert Online, Star Wars: the Old Republic, Bless Online, Crowfall, and Tera. MMOs people actually play. And that's still missing popular MMOs like The Elder Scrolls Online, Neverwinter, Star Trek Online, and I'm sure other MMOs I can't remember.

      Do you want me to link to its 49% Metacritic review?

      The idea that Sony would allow a popular MMO to be cross-platform is ludicrous, given their shenanigans with things like Minecraft and Fortnite.

    7. Re:This is going to be bad... by Yosho · · Score: 1

      ... for the console players until the console producers start making mouse & keyboard peripherals for them.

      Dude, consoles have had USB ports since somewhere around the PlayStation 2 era.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    8. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want me to link to its 49% Metacritic review?

      You mean the 49% Metacritic review that was done before A Realm Reborn?

      They re-wrote the game from scratch for a reason, and it paid off.

    9. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A character made in 2010 can still be played today, correct?

      Then it's the same game. The review stands.

    10. Re: This is going to be bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New code can still use old data from previous characters, it doesn't mean it's the same game.

    11. Re:This is going to be bad... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      ...consoles have had USB ports since somewhere around the PlayStation 2 era.

      Tell it to Microsoft: https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

      ...or did you miss the part where this article was about Microsoft and Nintendo only?

  6. Apple also is silent by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Minecraft for the Nintendo Switch is getting a big update today that will enable cross-play with PC, Xbox One, and smartphones -- but notably not the PlayStation 4.

    Mac is also absent.

    1. Re:Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minecraft for the Nintendo Switch is getting a big update today that will enable cross-play with PC, Xbox One, and smartphones -- but notably not the PlayStation 4.

      Mac is also absent.

      Firstly, a Mac is a PC.

      Secondly, Rocket League and Fortnite both support Mac natively along with cross-play to Windows, Xbox One, Switch, Smartphones (except Rocket League as it doesn't have an iOS/Android version).

    2. Re:Apple also is silent by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      A Mac is not a PC in that its operating system is not what people mean when they say PC. That's why there's PC and Mac, two distinct platforms.

      Of course, if you're booting Windows on your Mac, I'm not even considering it a Mac anymore.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re: Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. A Mac is a PC and has been ever since Apple saved the brand by ditching proprietary hardware.

    4. Re: Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of an IBM PC?
      Do you understand that others use "PC" and "Mac" to differentiate Windows and Mac even if you do not?
      Why are you capitalizing PC when you mean that a Mac is a personal computer?

    5. Re: Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a Mac is a PC then apple must be really confused.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eEG5LVXdKo

    6. Re:Apple also is silent by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Firstly, a Mac is a PC.

      A Mac is most definitely NOT a PC. Just because it uses an x86 processor doesn't make it a PC.

      The term PC is short for 'IBM PC Compatible' , meaning a computer compatible with the IBM 5150 Personal Computer. That is: it has to be able to run Microsoft PC DOS 1.0 and apps developed for that. Modern Mac's certainly can't run PC DOS 1.0 without emulation/virtualisation, they lack a lot of legacy PC stuff.

    7. Re: Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM PC = IBM Personal Computer. In "Personal Computer" what does prohibit Mac from being a PC? Duh?

    8. Re:Apple also is silent by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A Mac is not a PC in that its operating system is not what people mean when they say PC.

      And yet you can quite happily run Windows on a Mac. Don't redefine words at whim.

    9. Re:Apple also is silent by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The initialism PC is short for many things, but none of them are compatibility with the IBM PC. It meant personal computer before BM made it, and today's pc-compatible (which Macs are) will produce indeterminate results if you try to treat it like one. Hell, modern PCs don't even have a cassette port, how can you suggest they are compatible with the IBM PC?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my PC, my operating system of choice is Linux. It's not our fault that some people make the mistake of thinking PC = Windows.

    11. Re:Apple also is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried getting PC DOS 1.0 to run on a modern computer without emulation?

    12. Re:Apple also is silent by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      When you run Windows on a Mac then it's not a Mac anymore, it's a Windows PC.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re:Apple also is silent by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      it's not a Mac anymore

      To quote myself:

      Don't redefine words at whim.

    14. Re:Apple also is silent by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      A Mac is not only one thing: it's both hardware AND software. As soon as you remove one, it becomes not a Mac.

      That's also the reason a non-Apple computer running OS X/macOS is called a Hackintosh and not a Mac.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    15. Re:Apple also is silent by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A Mac is not only one thing: it's both hardware AND software.

      A Mac is not software.

      *sigh* Don't redefine words at whim.

    16. Re:Apple also is silent by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm not redefining words, you're the one who's not understanding what a Mac actually is.

      A Mac is a combination of hardware and software. Without both, it's not a Mac.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    17. Re:Apple also is silent by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not redefining words

      Says the person redefining what a mac is. Please go and tell people who own macs that they don't own macs. I'm sure you'll be met with the complete understanding of a person who is making sense and using words the way everyone else is too. /sarcasm

      Garbz out.

  7. Re:TCP/IP? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Informative

    Think of all the fun ways only a Microsoft can make simple networking more work.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Luigi and Peach in Super Mario Adventures by tepples · · Score: 2

    Nintendo has used that sort of cross-play as a plot point. Super Mario Adventures , a graphic novel first serialized across 12 issues of Nintendo Power in 1992, has an arc where Luigi and Peach swap outfits. Scenes in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga and Super Mario Odyssey call back to this swap.

  9. Just not with the Java version of Minecraft by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    The 'cross play' will of course be with the 'new' version of Minecraft that Microsoft has emphasized since they purchased Mojang. They are dead-set on marooning the Java version that most people I know play on. Which is actually and authentically cross-platform, running on any platform with a JVM.

    1. Re:Just not with the Java version of Minecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      authentically cross platform? pigs arse it was. it had different versions for different JVM's on different platforms and was a mess. not surprised they are moving away from it.

    2. Re:Just not with the Java version of Minecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking shit. It is the same jar file to play minecraft on macos, linux and windows. You can even go to the minecraft download page right now and see that it downloads the exact same jar from the launcher no matter whether you pick linux, macos or windows.

      They are moving away from it because they can't sell skins on something thats not locked down to the Nth degree.

    3. Re:Just not with the Java version of Minecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want nothing to do with the new Microsoft tainted version of Minecraft. The original version is great, has mods, and works perfectly for my Windows and Linux computers.

  10. Just do not get "married" by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    You know how it goes. Give them a finger, they will bite the whole hand

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Just do not get "married" by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I think you got married to a zombie or something.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  11. Yeah, cross-play is not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The account locking is the problem. Lack of cross-play is actually a boon, preventing cheaters from proliferating. Xbox has unfortunately had to put up with this ever since MS allowed PC gamers to start connecting, and there is nothing gamers can do to stop it.

  12. Re:TCP/IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already did that. They intentionally made the networking for minecraft pe and minecraft java incompatible with each other so that people on the original version of minecraft cannot crossplay with the walled-in version of minecraft. Gotta sell them skins somehow.

  13. Re:TCP/IP? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    No, it's just that it got utterly crushed in this console generation. This is two losers of the current generation's console competition teaming together to get audience comparable in size to winner's audience alone.

  14. Re:TCP/IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo are absolutely not in competition with Sony and Microsoft, they have their own market created with the likes of the DS and 3DS. Sony tried to enter it with the Vita but somehow managed to make a balls of it despite having a very powerful machine with a slew of excellent games.

  15. Re:TCP/IP? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

    Ah Slashdot, where in an article showing that Microsoft is actively working together with a competitor, as opposed to a different company, they are still the bad guy.

  16. Re: TCP/IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who deprioritized the java version and made it incompatible with the new walled garden version? If you said Microsoft (because they own it) you are right!

  17. Re: TCP/IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "walled garden version"?
    Is that the one that only works on Xbox and Windows, or the one available on basically everything short of a TI-85 calculator?

  18. Wait...didn't MS try this at one point? by autlycus · · Score: 1

    I thought that MS tried this with an FPS back when the original Xbox came out, and PC players owned console players so bad they had to disable it so the console players could enjoy the game...

  19. Re:TCP/IP? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    While partially true, when it comes to the same games, they most certainly are.

    And this is a discussion of cross-play, a function of playing the same game on different platforms. At that point they are by definition in competition with other platforms running the same game. And fortnite is most certainly one of those massive games that sell consoles.

  20. Re:TCP/IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo are absolutely not in competition with Sony and Microsoft

    LOL, nice cop-out. When your company of choice is successful, you exclaim "Nintendo is kicking their ass!" but when it's utter fail, you claim "Oh, but Nintendo aren't actually competing."

    Yes, Nintendo are competing (or at least trying to) with Sony and Microsoft.