Slashdot Mirror


128TB SD Cards Are Coming (theverge.com)

A new card specification has been announced by the SD Association that should let you store your entire media collection on one SD card. Technically speaking, the new card specification should increase maximum storage on SD cards to 128 terabytes with faster transfer speeds of 985 megabytes per second. The Verge reports: Right now the maximum storage space on an SD card is 2TB, and that limit was promised as far back as 2009, but still hasn't been reached. In 2016, SanDisk unveiled a prototype 1 terabyte SD card that would make it the biggest in the world, but it's still not available to purchase. At the time, SanDisk said that the advancement was necessary to match ever-increasing data-heavy formats like 4K video and VR. However, creating SD cards with massive amounts of storage is cost-prohibitive. SanDisk's 512GB SD card used to cost $800, and though it's dropped in price, is still priced around $300.

93 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Coming or not? by manu0601 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I read the summary correctly, we are far from having even a dozen terrabyte on a SD. Title is badly chosen.

    1. Re:Coming or not? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Correct. The standard allows for those specs, but no product with anything close to those specs exists.

      Lots of other stuff is coming too!

    2. Re:Coming or not? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      So true, 128TB cards could be ten years away, how dare anybody plan for it now.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Coming or not? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The 2TB limit was done nearly 10 years ago, still no one has made a 2TB card.

    4. Re:Coming or not? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Good thing somebody was on the ball. The market is full of 512gb memory cards right now, how far away do you think 2TB is?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Coming or not? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      8K will do its best to help with that.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Coming or not? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      So true, 128TB cards could be ten years away, how dare anybody plan for it now.

      Somehow you read from my post that we shouldn't plan for them? Amazing. I had no idea that is what I meant.

    7. Re:Coming or not? by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2 years at most.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:Coming or not? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      The 2TB limit was done nearly 10 years ago, still no one has made a 2TB card.

      Just wait until there is 2TB of porn.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:Coming or not? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The readers for these cards will either be built into computers or connect by USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) or Thunderbolt 3 (40 Gbps). That should allow the speed of the new cards to be used effectively.

    10. Re:Coming or not? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      We will never see 128TB SD cards. Never. I would even be willing to wager money on it.

      Maybe even you can see how ridiculous that statement is. In case you still don't see it... supposing you win, when do you collect?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    11. Re:Coming or not? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Not within the lifetime of anyone alive right now.

      Haha. Idiot.

      Modded down by an idiot with mod points? I hear they stick together.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    12. Re:Coming or not? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Full?
      If you take Sandisk for example, they have 512GB SD cards, but they're slow.
      They have a 95MB/s read speed Extreme Pro card that only supports UHS-I. They only guarantee sustained sequential writing of 30MB/s
      Their largest UHS-II card is 128GB

    13. Re:Coming or not? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      mh ... "could" ... 1tb just released as a prototype so that should take about the time it took the 600mb cd to go to bluray size only and also ... "where did i leave that thing", i cant find it ? did the dog swallow it ? "did you vacuum the place, dear ?" that's a LOT of data in one small spot

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Form Factor seems to be the bigger problem by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Going to be a long while before we can get even close to the SD form factor holding 128 TB

  3. Prices by DaMattster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would just like to see prices fall on SSDs to the same level as regular hard drives. SSDs are still kind of expensive.

    1. Re:Prices by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they probably won't anytime soon. Not necessarily because it's impossible, but simply because they're the premium hard drive product and will be priced in such a way. Perhaps once they have sufficient capacity to supplant spinning disks in even the entry level bargain PCs and notebooks, the price difference between the two will erode further, but I don't think there are enough companies manufacturing the NAND flash memory to really drive prices down through competition and the biggest players are facing a price-fixing lawsuit at the current moment so they may have been conspiring to keep prices artificially high.

    2. Re:Prices by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's called patents, artificial inflation of profit margins by corrupt corporations and governments, expect patent duration to be extended probably fifty years, corrupt government and the current one certainly is that, will deliver to the corporations regardless of the harm caused, psychopaths will be psychopaths.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Prices by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of competition in the SSD space, and prices are falling faster than HDD. But spinning magnetic media is still cheaper to produce per bit, but a factor of 7-8 or so now. That is a lot of gap close even in just the last year. Eventually, SSD will take so much market away from HDD that economies of scale will weaken. They already have, actually.

      It is possible that prices will eventually reach parity, but more likely they will just keep getting asymptotically closer for the next decade or two. But for personal use, the tipping point was already reached some time ago - there are far more computing devices now shipping with SSD than spinning disk. The holdouts are just ultra cheap laptops and desktops, and even there, a new wave of Chromebook-like devices is taking over. Maybe just two or three years until you just won't see any PCs with root fs on HDD are as rare as floppies.

      Soon, consumer HDD will only be for backup and media archive. In that role, you will probably be more interested in 5400rpm drives, which makes the mechanical parts cheaper, quieter and less power hungry, so I don't see HDD completely disappearing for home use any time soon. But we will continue to see many users who just don't care about backup, or who think that backing up to the cloud is a good idea. Maybe in a couple of years you will be seeing HDD in less than a quarter of home PCs, and nonexistent in the office. At that point, SSD will still be at least 5 times more expensive per bit than HDD and that won't be enough of a gap to move most people.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Prices by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I don't think any one company owns enough patents related to NAND to prevent anyone from making it if they wanted to. Typically, companies get together and create a patent pool that offers FRAND licensing terms so anyone can pay, and everyone pays the same price. A company which owns some of those patents might have an edge since they're paying themselves in part. The real cost savings will be on the production side so if you can make a better fabrication process with lower defects and better yields, you'll make it up there.

      However patents or not, it doesn't matter if the companies are price fixing, which is what is be charged. I'm not really sure why you're ranting about patents when I don't think they have anything to do with this case specifically, and typically aren't much of an issue in this space as no one company has enough patents by itself to make anything useful without being sued by some other company so they're forced to band together to create some kind of standard.

    5. Re:Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The holdouts are just ultra cheap laptops and desktops

      I mean, maybe, but I bought a cheap HP Stream 11 a year or two ago. 4 GB RAM, 64 GB MMC. Not fast. Not a big screen. Not a great laptop. But it was $200, and it's extremely lightweight. So... if even the $200 machines have given up spinning rust, how much place does it really still have for that use case? Spinning rust is for bulk storage, because it's still loads cheaper for big drives, but practically speaking, the entire market is booting off SSD's.

    6. Re:Prices by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's important to differentiate between the companies that make and sell SSDs and the companies that manufacture the NAND flash memory that is used in SSDs. In the case of the first, there is significantly more competition, but there aren't as many companies that actually make the NAND and it's those that have been accused of price fixing and possibly other anti-competitive behavior.

      I also expect that part of the reason SSD prices are falling faster relative to HDD prices is that the bare minimum material cost for an HDD is more expensive. An SSD is just a cheap enclosure around a bunch of NAND flash chips on a board with connectors, an embedded processor, and a few other components that are relatively inexpensive and subject to price decreases as a result of Moore's law. The enclosure for the HDD is more sturdy and made of more expensive materials and other parts that have more of a fixed cost that holds stable.

      One advantage that SSDs have is that NAND manufacturers have been willing to move from SLC/MLC NAND as used in the initial SSDs to TLC and now even QLC NAND, which has greatly increased the storage capacity of SSDs and even allows for greater capacity than you can get in an HDD assuming you're willing to pay the obscene costs. This does come at the expense of longevity as you get fewer program-erase cycles when using more bits per cell. For most consumers this doesn't matter as they're unlikely to hit those limits and any SSD is going to be a major speed improvement over an HDD.

      I do agree that HDD will likely be relegated to backup and archival purposes. I don't have many computers left that aren't using an SSD for their main drive and I can't see myself using anything but an SSD as a primary in future builds.

    7. Re:Prices by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I mean, maybe, but I bought a cheap HP Stream 11 a year or two ago. 4 GB RAM, 64 GB MMC. Not fast. Not a big screen. Not a great laptop. But it was $200, and it's extremely lightweight. So... if even the $200 machines have given up spinning rust, how much place does it really still have for that use case?

      Couldn't be bothered to go on Amazon or Newegg and see what is actually being sold? OK, you blathered on about what you bought and you have plenty of company. But as of today, your basic cheap laptop has a 1TB spinning disk. Go cheap than that and you find Chromebooks, that's about it. A Chromebook is not normally considered a laptop.

      Everybody knows that hard disks will be disappearing from laptops sooner or later, but as of today it has not happened. By the way, it's a stretch to call an 11" machine a laptop. Notebook at best.

      By the way, those super cheap notebooks are crap for running Windows, half the time they crash on update, but they run Linux just fine.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:Prices by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I don't put in traditional SSD any more either, I don't know about you but it's been M.2 for me in everything except legacy upgrades. I suppose you can loosely call that SSD, but it isn't really, it is a block device but it is not SATA. Goodbye disk, it's no longer trying to act like one.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Prices by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The M.2 SATA is 100% SATA-compatible, complete with slow transfer speeds and everything!

      The only possible reason for wanting that would be some lame version of Windows or something like that. Otherwise, avoid.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:Prices by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I would just like to see prices fall on SSDs to the same level as regular hard drives. SSDs are still kind of expensive.

      Depends on whether your glass is half full or half empty, SSDs are way cheaper than HDDs a few decades ago. I'm thinking if we could magically make SSDs 10x cheaper, why not HDDs too? Then instead of 512GB SSDs and 4TB HDDs we could have 4TB SSDs and 32TB HDDs. I mean there's always a market for cheap bulk storage as long as there's significant savings. It's pretty much perfect for a video library with 99% sequential access, putting it on an SSD doesn't really add any value at all.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Prices by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Having spinning disks in a laptop is just irresponsible and should come with large warning signs.

      Give me a break. This has been the status quo for thirty years and is only changing now, not because it doesn't work, but because something better finally arrived. And don't get the idea that laptops suddenly stopped shipping with hard disks last week. It's going to end soon, but as of today many or most of the low end laptops still have them.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    12. Re:Prices by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I've seen SSD undercut traditional hard disk cost-per-TB when procuring enterprise storage in the last couple of years.

      But enterprise storage follows weird arcane rules that I can't decipher. Luckily storage gonks love dealing with that shit.

    13. Re:Prices by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually it's due to increasing demand for flash memory. Phones, computers, smart devices like TVs and speakers, car infotainment systems, SD cards and more all use larger and larger amounts of flash memory.

      It's expensive and difficult to set up new factories to compete with the established ones making 3D NAND flash on cutting edge processes, so there isn't enough competition to offset the demand and keep prices falling.

      Same thing happened with RAM. Demand from phones in particular made the price go up a lot. Manufacturers put more of their resources into low power mobile DDR4 so desktop DDR4 supplies were hit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Prices by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I put a 16GB Chromebook ssd pull in my desktop as an emergency Linux boot. If something goes wrong with Windows I have a fallback, and it was like five bucks shipped.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Prices by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      At any given point in time, SSDs are more desirable than HDDs on many axes except capacity. Why would you expect the market clearing price to be lower?

  4. What nonsense by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's like saying with 64-bit computers we'd get 16 exabyte (that's 2^32 * 4GB) of RAM. Sure there's addressing space but it won't happen now and quite possibly never. It's probably good to keep the spec a bit in front of what's realistic though.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:What nonsense by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I was rather amused to read the RISC-V processor whitepaper, and apparently they've designed the processor to (optionally) support 128-bit memory address space. They figure it'll be necessary for supercomputers to support spaces that big by 2030 or something.

    2. Re:What nonsense by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily addressable space (there are less than 2e128 atoms in the Universe) but bus width. We already have 192 bit busses on GPU today.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:What nonsense by genik76 · · Score: 1

      In 2004 there was a discussion here at ./ with the topic 12GB CompactFlash Cards Coming Soon. There somebody wrote: Really, I know there are a few niche applications for that much space in compact flash, but where's the real market for these? Aren't most pros still using film, making the ammount of people willing to spend that much money on a CF card even smaller? Discuss.

    4. Re:What nonsense by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      If I read the spec correctly, they were indeed talking about address space, not bus width or SIMD.

      RISC-V is clever in some ways, but pretty bonkers in others.

    5. Re:What nonsense by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It's probably good to keep the spec a bit in front of what's realistic though.

      So like IPv4 32bit addressing space then?

      Actually IPv4 had kinda the opposite problem, they were so far ahead of the curve that nobody designed a good system to expand. I mean if somebody had started with 2^16 or 2^24 it would obviously have been too small and we'd have gone through several iterations or added some variable length encoding or something. But 2^32 bit is 4.3 billion set in 1981 when the world population was 4.5 billion and the IBM PC was first launched, just the idea that one person would have their own computer was in its infancy. And even then it looked like pretty much everyone in the whole world could have an IP, so the number was "ridiculous". It was really just picked because 2^16 = 65536 seemed low and four bytes was the next logical doubling.

      Fast forward to 2018 and we're 7.6 billion - okay that was predictable, billions of people are actually online through mobile phones - that was eventually reasonable but it was hard to predict that poor people could afford or want a "PC" so soon - but we also need many IPs per person. Like home computer, work computer, smartphone, smart-TV, NAS, VMs, IoT and so on. I don't think anyone saw that one coming back in 1981, but the result is that 4 billion is actually way too little. We saw it around the dotcom boom, made IPv6 and the remaining problem is not the standard but adoption. If it's even a problem, /. had this big death watch countdown but it didn't implode when it ran out or anything.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:What nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Last I read, there were 10e80 atoms in the observable universe. 2e128 is 41 orders of magnitude smaller than that.

  5. Re:What's the point? by Bobrick · · Score: 1

    Tell that to people who shoot in 4k, 4:2:2 16-bit RAW video. If we need that capacity, we can afford it.

  6. Futurama Quote by Zorro · · Score: 2

    "That's a Lot Of Pornography!"

  7. Re:128TB @ ~ 1GB/s by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Far out... how many photos are you taking?!

  8. Re: True... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Spam is not welcome on Slashdot, regardless of the political views of the spammer. Begone.

  9. The End Is Coming by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    But we might have to wait some billions of years before it does..

  10. Re:What's the point? by Desler · · Score: 1

    Except even they wouldn't need. 8K Red cameras can shoot 8 hours of footage at the 300MB/sec maximum bitrate and only need less than 10 TB of storage to store it all.

  11. Re: What's the point? by Bobrick · · Score: 2

    See, there's this whole industry dedicated to video production. If you're shooting anything close to professional productions, hell even with prosumer gear today, something like a 64gb sd card is not even worth mentioning. I got 1tb of SD storage over a 512gb and 2x 256gb, and I'm on the market for a recorder/SSD drives setup now. I do run and gun documentary stuff, for the most part, and if I'm out on a shoot in the woods or somewhere remote for a couple of days, 1TB is bare minimum for the whole shoot. Aunt Darlene is probably fine with a 8gb card for the xmas pictures, a professional shoot has other requirements. Release a 12 TB card and I won't care what it costs, it will be paid back the first or second time I use it.

  12. Re:What's the point? by Desler · · Score: 1

    I say this in reference to the 128 TB SD card of course.

  13. Re:Hope you don't want to copy that.... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Unless you're reading it from a device that doesn't support SD Express. UHS-II and UHS-III will do up to 312MB/s.
    On top of that an SD Express card will only do 104MB/s in a UHS-III reader. Your device has to choose between UHS or SD Express, as there are different functions for the extra row of pins. UHS is a proprietary SD protocol, SD Express has a PCIe 3.0 x1 link.

    Now you're looking at 380 hours to read/write your card.

    The same thing has happened with hard drives too. The disk-to-head speeds in most drives are still around 150MB/s, yet capacity increases all the time.
    Seagate's 12TB drive has a max speed of 250MB/s, or 16 hours. But that's only the speed on the outer edge of the platter. It slows down as you get to the inside.

  14. Re:What's the point? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I say this in reference to the 128 TB SD card of course.

    And talk about putting all your eggs in one basket. 128 TB is a lot of data to lose at one time.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  15. Got my 128TB card already on Alibaba! by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1, Funny

    Got it three months ago and it's so big that my phone is like all getting confused and messing things up.

  16. Re:interesting by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    The interface will be up to 985MB/s
    You'll never find that in real products though, as they'll be limited to a single flash chip, so no parallel access to increase speed like regular SSD's.
    The cards are also limited to 1.8W of power too, to run a PCIe 3.0 interface, the NVMe controller and the flash chip. Good luck.

    If you put multiple microSD cards in a SD card slot, you'd probably exceed the power capability of the device.

  17. How about an SD card that fits in the slots? by greenwow · · Score: 1

    Older Dell laptops like the Latitudes can accept an SD card so that it doesn't stick out, but newer laptops, including Apples, they stick out about a 1/3 of the size of the card so they constantly get damaged and/or damage the slot. How about making damn cards that fit before changing standards to support cards that don't exist yet?

    1. Re:How about an SD card that fits in the slots? by crow · · Score: 1

      This!

      Actually, all I want is a micro-SD slot. In my old laptop, I had a micros-SD adapter that I kept in the SD slot. My new laptop would leave it sticking out. Not good.

      I know space is at a premium in laptops, and my new Dell is every bit as sexy as an Apple laptop, but couldn't they spare a few more cubic millimeters?

    2. Re:How about an SD card that fits in the slots? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Older Dell laptops like the Latitudes can accept an SD card so that it doesn't stick out, but newer laptops, including Apples, they stick out about a 1/3 of the size of the card so they constantly get damaged and/or damage the slot. How about making damn cards that fit before changing standards to support cards that don't exist yet?

      Because you're not suppose to use those slots for permanent extended storage. They're not usually on a good interface ( USB3 typically) or dreadfully slow.

      They're a convenience slot - you use it to take the card from your camera and copying the photos off it, then putting the card back on it.

      Though some people make shortened SD cards that do fit flush for those who really want to use them as a full time storage slot.

    3. Re:How about an SD card that fits in the slots? by crow · · Score: 1

      Great idea. A keyboard with an SD-card reader would be great. Even a keyboard with a built-in USB hub would be convenient. (I know some have that feature, but it's all too rare.)

  18. This will hold 6,740,000 still pix on my Olympus by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I shoot one picture a minute 365/24, it will take me just under thirteen years to fill up one of these cards. Now that's what I would call a photo trip.

    Unfortunately, I would then have to spend 39 years in Lightroom Classic editing this set of pictures. My wife will kill me, especially when she has to sit through the slideshow later.

  19. Storage issues by unixisc · · Score: 1

    But has anybody ever needed more than that in one's phone or tablet or camera? Also, even in Android 6 and beyond, even if one formats an SD card as internal memory, there are still certain apps - particularly system apps, that will insist on being on the physical internal storage, and won't touch the SD card. Storage companies are far better off selling Apple, Samsung, et al high density NOR flash ranging from 64GB to 512GB, thereby eliminating any storage issues for devices

    1. Re:Storage issues by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      But has anybody ever needed more than that in one's phone or tablet or camera?

      Yes.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Storage issues by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      By the way, that "physical internal storage" you speak of is typically just a SD card with BGA instead of pins.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Storage issues by edwdig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think pro-photographers in multi-hour photo sessions with high res cameras.

      Think people recording 4K video.

      Think gamers on a Nintendo Switch that prefer downloading their games.

      As storage options get larger, people find ways to use the extra space.

    4. Re:Storage issues by N1AK · · Score: 1

      I record 4K video and I can't see any of those examples you come up with justifying the need for more than 2TB of data on a single SD card. Obviously that doesn't mean that uses for that amount of data won't come along though. Having said that, one of the biggest issue with SD for video recording and photography isn't storage (A 2TB card could hold 60-100k raw images) but IO. This standard looks like it could be useful in the near future for use cases where the write speeds of U3, V60, and V90 cards are problematic. Having said that the 128TB limit does seem rather pointless (but I suppose there's no harm). I doubt we'll see 10TB+ cards before 2030 which means it may have been better to wait to create a standard nearer to when it is useful. An obvious issue would be that even at the 985 megabyte transfer speed isn't going to be viable even at 16TB (where it would take 4.5 hours to fully read/write) let alone 128TB.

    5. Re:Storage issues by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Measly 4K video? 8K cameras and displays already exist. So far they all have to record to external recorders because SD cards aren't big or fast enough, but this standard will make it possible once the technology to make those larger cards is ready

    6. Re:Storage issues by GoTeam · · Score: 1

      Hah, I was thinking the exact same thing. If the past few decades have taught us anything, it's that given enough resources programming will become increasingly inefficient. Why clear memory when computers already have so much? Why compress any file format when you've got so much disk space?

    7. Re:Storage issues by K10W · · Score: 1

      Think pro-photographers in multi-hour photo sessions with high res cameras.

      Think people recording 4K video.

      Those pros will be using CFast setup or tethering to external storage not a solo SD card setup for that. Plus for multi hour sessions not just pros but serious hobbyists/amateurs like myself wont put all eggs in one basket and use several cards plus tether (or use external storage made for hooking up to cam). Pro cameras tend to be multi card and SD storage is not the primary choice in those and if present is the backup slot, most pros I know who'd use one storage source on extended shoot (eg. not your average wedding tog) use external storage or laptop tethering and card as backup anyway and spread the cards out as extra precaution rather than using the absolute biggest. Despite being amateur I do own stills and vid gear and run home studio complete with long shoots and very extensive big lighting setups, admittedly have friends/family involved between hobby to pro level (the pros are mostly film industry rather than still guys fwiw so maybe still pros would feel different just not the ones I know).

      Don't get me wrong cards of that size would have their use but the"it is pros who need this" that is often heard over such things isn't true. It is mainly a marketing thing were most who buy it have no real need of it and will be average consumers with a few pro folks who NEED but are a niche within a niche and most who will buy it is more for convenience than a need. I have seen a fair few less serious amateurs or normal folk use the biggest card they can and never remove it from the camera nor clear off their pics after shooting so it'd be more appreciated by them. They shoot jpeg and have photos on there from holidays from close to a year ago for instance.

    8. Re:Storage issues by K10W · · Score: 1

      I record 4K video and I can't see any of those examples you come up with justifying the need for more than 2TB of data on a single SD card. Obviously that doesn't mean that uses for that amount of data won't come along though. Having said that, one of the biggest issue with SD for video recording and photography isn't storage (A 2TB card could hold 60-100k raw images) but IO. This standard looks like it could be useful in the near future for use cases where the write speeds of U3, V60, and V90 cards are problematic. Having said that the 128TB limit does seem rather pointless (but I suppose there's no harm). I doubt we'll see 10TB+ cards before 2030 which means it may have been better to wait to create a standard nearer to when it is useful. An obvious issue would be that even at the 985 megabyte transfer speed isn't going to be viable even at 16TB (where it would take 4.5 hours to fully read/write) let alone 128TB.

      Consumer type 4K wont need that extra space, pro implimentation tends to several times the size of equivalent files from a consumer unit. Compare your average consumer device "4k" to higher settings UHD from a pro device such as prores 4444xq 12bit and you'll find it will chew through space much faster. Industry oft need raw UHD for post processing reasons but they wont ever be recording to SD so you're right, the only folks who'd possibly use it wont need any such size and the ones who would use the size are tethering to external storage or using different internal cards.

  20. Long time to read it by kevink707 · · Score: 1

    Assuming I did my math correctly, 128 TB at 985 Mb/second is 1.5 days to read the entire card (and I'm guessing writing would be slower). That seems awfully slow (or at least should be by the time 128 TB becomes reality).

  21. Re:Whipslash: Please start deleting this spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have mixed feelings about this. I'd be happy for a lot of the AC spam to go away. We don't need hosts file crap, harassment of creimer, or anything like that. But there are legitimate reasons to post AC. There are also some people who feel more comfortable not logging in because of the degree to which we're tracked everywhere we go.

    I work in meteorology and some of my work involves working with climate data. There are some controversial issues involved and these are small fields. If I say things that are critical and it can be traced back to me, it can have significant consequences on my career. I'll give you an example from my own experience. I'm posting this AC, but I wouldn't dare say this if I thought it could be traced back to me.

    I work with climate data sets. I'm trying to get some closed source software from researchers housed at a particular university. The software is a collection of tools that we'll use for processing climate data sets. The specific tools I want to use documented in a paper that acknowledges federal funding sources like NSF in the completion of the work, though funding for other tools may have come from other sources. They've been very willing to let us use those tools in the past, but this time we're running into a bunch of red tape involving the licensing of the software that's largely been developed with public sector funds. I know I'm not the only person running into these issues.

    It's important for scientific research to be verified and reproduced to the fullest extent that its possible. When dealing with climate data, any perceived lack of transparency is used to cast aspersions on the researchers and their findings. I absolutely don't believe the scientists at this university are engaging in research misconduct. However, global warming deniers will latch onto anything that has even a slight appearance that researchers are covering things up and not being transparent. It's potentially damaging to the reputation of the scientists in my field; just look how the East Anglia "Climategate" emails have been (ab)used to discredit researchers. I believe the red tape and licensing issues is for the purpose of impeding other researchers and giving them a competitive advantage in obtaining funding. This university does good research, but their licensing practices are very harmful to other researchers and to the field.

    I believe that software developed with federal funds should be open source, if nothing else to ensure the reproducibility of the research. Organizations like NOAA already require that data sets collected with their funds be released to the public within two years of the collection of the data. I've thought about posting this many times in discussions about academia, software licensing, and climate discussions. I don't dare post this with an account because I don't want this hurting my career. I'm hesitant to even name the university involved, lest anyone there who is familiar with my situation can guess who I am and hold it against me in blind peer review of journal papers or funding proposals.

    Stuff like this is why AC posting is still useful. I'm sure I'm not the only person encountering this type of red tape, and a comment like this would be on-topic in quite a few discussions on this site (although not this one). However, because there aren't that many researchers in my field, I don't dare say this where it can be traced back to me.

  22. M.2 NVMe SSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why not just go for M.2 2230 instead of SD-cards? SD-card is 24x32mm, so it is actually bigger. And M.2 SSDs can be gotten in reasonably large sizes while being much more reliable (number of writes) compared to an SD-card. SD-cards reach up to 3W and the maximum for the NVMe spec is 7W (while actual SSDs like WD Black are rated at 135 mW), so power consumption is probably not a big factor either (especially considering the SSD will finish 20 times faster and go to idle).

    1. Re:M.2 NVMe SSD by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Why not just go for M.2 2230 instead of SD-cards? SD-card is 24x32mm, so it is actually bigger.

      Presumably because the M.2 family are designed for internal use and the SD card is designed for external use.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  23. Redudancy by should_be_linear · · Score: 2

    I would prefer it to be 5TB card with lots of redundancy using remaining 123TB, so that data would persist hundreds of years on average. I don't think my family will create more then 5TB of data in our entire lifetime anyway.

    --
    839*929
    1. Re:Redudancy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even if you have that much redundant flash memory it does nothing to handle controller failure. The only way to get multiple redundant controllers is multiple cards.

      This is one reason why people use BluRay for archival storage. The storage media is separate from the reader electronics and you only need to preserve one. They are also immune to electrical problems like static damage and don't use undocumented, proprietary data formats.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  24. Don't care by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Wonderful. Now make a 1 TB SSD affordable and cut the price fixing crap.

  25. In a pigs eye. by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    Yeah, in 20 years. 128TB will be the maximum addressable memory in the spec. By then, the world will be run by a single raspberry PI running MultiVac.

  26. Re:This will hold 6,740,000 still pix on my Olympu by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    There's an easy solution to this. Tell your wife that if she wants to see you some more then you need to upgrade to a Nikon D850. That way you will only have space for 1,280,000 still files, it will only take you 2.5 years to shoot, and you'll only be locked in the study with Lightroom for 7.5 years.

    Consider it the golden anniversary present for her, ... since you'll actually have time your golden anniversary this way. :)

  27. Re: True... by Cederic · · Score: 2

    What an interesting misinterpretation of how moderation on Slashdot works.

    If you have mod points, you ARE a moderator. Moderate moderately.

  28. Re: What's the point? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I shoot video at dance events for fun not profit, and even shoot just 1080p I'm getting between 50 and 80GB a day.

    My cameras will do 4K, I just have nowhere to put it and people want the videos online some time this year.

  29. Re:This will hold 6,740,000 still pix on my Olympu by Cederic · · Score: 2

    My wife will kill me, especially when she has to sit through the slideshow later.

    Nah. You'll still only have four you want to keep.

  30. Mod system by DrYak · · Score: 2

    There's an efficient mod system on /. spam will rather quickly down voted to -1.

    If you don't like the spam, browse at some higher level like 1 or 2 (and keep -1 and 0 hidden).
    If you're afraid of your eyes getting hurt by some spam, don't jump straight into a new article on the second it's published on /. , but wait a bit for the mod storm to settle down.

    I personally find it absolutely remarkable that /. close to never deletes post. (the Scientology post being the first ever deletion).
    There's no actual censorship, only moderation. That bring some content more forward than other, depending on the current zeitgeist anong /.ers, but never deletes content, every voice could be heard if you decide to browse at level -1 or click on "show hidden comments".
    It's remarkable and should it kept this way.

    Just ignore the troll you don't like. And don't feed them.

    Also APK doesn't exist anymore, he was replaced by a swarm of machine learning bots which was trained on his insane rambling and are currently imitating him, troll posting, calling each other ne'er-do-wells with fake names and complaining at each other for the impersonation.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  31. APK doesn't exist anymore. by DrYak · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    B-b-b-b-but host files!

    APK doesn't exist anymore, he was replaced by a swarm of machine learning bots which were trained on his insane rambling (see title !) and are currently imitating => him, troll posting in bold, calling each other ne'er-do-wells with fake names and complaining at each other for the impersonation.

    The real APK died some years ago while trying to install his h o s t f i l e e n g i n e on his brainstem pacemaker, because he was persuaded that it was a better defence against his disease than actual medicine.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  32. Depends from whom ? by DrYak · · Score: 1

    The market is full of 512gb memory cards right now, how far away do you think 2TB is?

    From whom ?
    From asian noname companies on ebay and aliexpress, that sell you a card that will fail horrifically after a couple of weeks of use (or doesn't even actually contain the advertised amount of flash and will corrupt its own data).

    From reputable brands that feature all type of wear levelling including passive, uses ECC to recover from corruption, etc ?
    Some of the most reputable brands haven't even moved to the 512 GB bandwagon yet.

    As density increase (and thus feature size miniaturizes) and as technology moves from SLC -> MLC -> TLC -> etc... data gets less stable and more care should be spent making sure against corruption.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Depends from whom ? by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      A quick check on amazon.co.uk shows that I can get from Amazon themselves 512GB SD cards from SanDisk, Kingston and PNY.

      You can also get from SanDisk a 400GB microSD card, and Integral do a 512GB microSD, though I am not sure the uplift in price from 400GB is worth it.

      Can't see anything from Samsung on a quick Google, but 512GB is a thing, though I guess demand is quite limited.

      I have 32GB onboard on my phone and a 128GB card for all my audiobooks and photos/videos. Nice to see the price for higher capacities has dropped somewhat in the last 9 months. You can get 256GB microSD for the price I paid for 128GB now.

    2. Re:Depends from whom ? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      If it's possible to make 400GB and 512GB microSD cards, it should be possible to make full size SD cards that are significantly larger. I wouldn't be surprised if the reason they don't exist (SanDisk demoed a 1GB SD card but hasn't put it into production) is that the current cards are too slow for most of the use cases that would actually need more capacity and be willing to pay for it, like professional videographers. If that's true we will see 1GB and perhaps even 2GB SD cards shortly after this standard is adopted, just in time to go into the new cameras that use it.

  33. Got the solution for you ! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I've got a magic magnetick-repellant sticker that you can put on your phone, it will both keep the card confusion away and protect you from the evil mind-controlling microwaves. PM me and I'll send my new e-bay coordinates.

    I can also get you incredible rebates on Monster Cables.

    ---

    Seriously, for people being actually victim of the scam about which the above poster jokes : use F3Tools to detect and file a complain and ask a refund with the online shop (ali express, ebay, etc.)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  34. Re:This will hold 6,740,000 still pix on my Olympu by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I guess they are aimed at people shooting 8k video. Currently there are some proprietary formats for 8k cameras. Red make some that are SSD based but they only manage about 250MB/sec read speeds so take a while to transfer the footage to the editing machine.

    Linus Tech Tips did a video about it recently. You might think 250MB/sec is pretty fast but when you are shooting 8k video every single day it becomes a bit of a bottleneck. And also, it's expensive because it's Red's proprietary format.

    This is one of the reasons why 8k has taken so long to arrive. 4k wasn't too much of a demand on existing editing and storage hardware, but 8k60 and especially 8k120 with decent compression ratios need a lot of new tech. Faster storage and processing, new workflows (most editing is done in 1080p or 4k for performance reasons, then rendered from the original 8k files), and of course new cameras.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  35. Re:Whipslash: Please start deleting this spam by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Whipslash, please start deleting this spam. It shows up in just about every article and is totally offtopic. This has nothing to do with my political views and everything to do with not liking spam posts. There's just too much offtopic nonsense (Trump/Hillary posts, APK spam, threads attacking creimer, etc...) polluting just about every story. Please consider removing the spam that's showing up in just about every story.

    C'mon... This kind of bollocks is practically a /. tradition.

    Off topic, inflammatory post meant to stir shit has been commonplace for years. It used to be things like Switcheuers and Lunix, NAMBLA, or what to do with you n****r sort of posts all modded down to -1. Now its Trump/Hillary (Trillary or perhaps Himp).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  36. ECC by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A quick check on amazon.co.uk shows that I can get from Amazon themselves 512GB SD cards from SanDisk, Kingston and PNY.

    A more thorough check would have made you notice that none of these (nor Samsung) does feature ECC recovery on their *consumer* cards.
    If you read the fine print, it's even worse. Even the "endurance" and "action cam" range of consumer product aren't actually recommended for continuous writing (you voided your warranty by putting into a continuously writing device a card that was exactly marketed for that ?!?)

    You would need to go to the (much more expensive) *industrial* range of card to actually find ECC and cards that are recommended for continuous writing.

    Transcend is currently the only brand I know of that actually provides ECC (and static wear-leveling) even on their *consumer* product range.

    These spec have an important impact if you want to use these cards for hosting an OS on a single-board computer (Raspberry Pi), using more intensively the card on your smartphone (not only for "cold" media like old photos), use it on continuously writing devices like dashcam/actioncams/dronecams, as extra storage on a ultra-notebook, etc.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  37. 16,777,216TB RAM Computers are Coming!!! by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    With the advent of 64bit addressing we are at the dawn of a new age - computers with 16,777,216TB or RAM are coming!

  38. Re: Whipslash: Please start deleting this spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And this has what to do with 128TB SD cards?

  39. Some 11" notebooks work offline, others not by tepples · · Score: 1

    By the way, it's a stretch to call an 11" machine a laptop. Notebook at best.

    Except that an 11.6" laptop running Windows or X11/Linux is designed to work well offline, as opposed to a Chromebook that is intended to be tethered to Wi-Fi or used with a subscription to a cellular ISP. I'm waiting for general availability of Crostini, a forthcoming feature of Chrome OS to let it run GNU without first being put in self-destruct mode, before buying my own Chromebook.

  40. For 1-spindle laptops by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's pretty much perfect for a video library with 99% sequential access, putting it on an SSD doesn't really add any value at all.

    Except for convenience to carry around. Many smaller laptops don't have enough internal space for both an NVMe SSD and a SATA HDD. So you'd need a SATA SSD and some sort of external enclosure for your HDD.

  41. Unmount how? by tepples · · Score: 1

    They're a convenience slot - you use it to take the card from your camera and copying the photos off it, then putting the card back on it.

    I don't see the "convenience" in the operating system holding some file open and thereby not letting the user unmount the card.

  42. Here's what sucks about this by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    You remove said 128TB card from your computer. Being the butter-fingers that you are, you drop it on the floor. While trying to find it, you roll over it with your office chair thus breaking it in half.

  43. Re:BS: You = FAKE NAME for a FAKE lie of a life by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I don't have any other accounts on Slashdot than this one. It's come to my attention recently that a couple of people are consistently modding my posts Overrated in the mistaken belief that I am using a sockpuppet to mod myself up. They apparently do not understand that accounts with high Karma post with an automatic bonus. I have had this account for 20 years and have excellent Karma, so I post at 2 by default. (You get more Karma by consistently making posts that other Slashdotters mod up.) So no need for me to have any sockpuppets, even if I were inclined to play those sorts of games, which I'm not. So you dumbasses can stop wasting those Overrated mods now.

    APK, nobody is stalking you. The truth of the matter is that you scan stories looking for mentions of "host files", "APK", and other words/phrases which you seem to think are related, then starting spamming them with ads for your POS programme and/or attacks on Slashdotters to whom you've taken a dislike.

    I summoned you by posting the magical phrase "host files". And of course you showed up. Everyone can see this is the case. I can't stop you from posting, but I sure as hell can make you show up whenever I feel like it, can't I?

    I was not the one who suggested getting rid of ACs; in fact, I just went on record above as being against the idea. Even though this means we'll have to continue to put up with trolls such as yourself.

    The only drugs I'm addicted to are caffeine and nicotine. I seldom drink alcohol, and I gave up cannabis or any other sort of chemical intoxicant a long time ago. Most people are capable of changing their behaviour, and so am I.

    I have never threatened you with any sort of harm--you and I both know this--and I never will. Rather than attacking me, you should be grateful that I am an ethical being who tried to teach you a lesson that, for your own good, you really need to learn. One of these days, you are going to cross someone who isn't ethical. I will be sorry when this happens, because--unlike you--I do not enjoy the suffering of others. You should modify your behaviour before the consequences catch up with you. And, no, that is not a threat--just an observation.

    Many people, including me, have tried to help you see the error of your ways. And in every case, you "thank" them by attacking them. The result is that is you turn people who are trying to be your friends into your enemies, and you deny yourself the chance for any positive change.

    You've been doing this for at least the past 20 years or so that I've known you. Don't you think it's about time you tried to do things differently?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  44. Re:What's the point? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    That is why you buy TWO! The second one being a mirror of the first one.

    I say this in reference to the 128 TB SD card of course.

    And talk about putting all your eggs in one basket. 128 TB is a lot of data to lose at one time.

    That is why you buy TWO! The second one being a mirror of the first one.

    Mirroring a 128 TB SD crd, eh? Sounds like fun

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.