Slashdot Mirror


Kim Dotcom Can Be Extradited To US On Copyright Charges, New Zealand Court Rules (yahoo.com)

schwit1 shares a report from Yahoo News: Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom suffered a major setback in his epic legal battle against online piracy charges Thursday when New Zealand's Court of Appeal ruled he was eligible for extradition to the United States. The German national, who is accused of netting millions from his file sharing Megaupload empire faces charges of racketeering, fraud and money laundering in the U.S., carrying jail terms of up to 20 years. Dotcom had asked the court to overturn two previous rulings that the Internet mogul and his three co-accused be sent to America to face charges. Instead, a panel of three judges backed the FBI-led case, which began with a raid on Dotcom's Auckland mansion in January 2012 and has dragged on for more than six years. His lawyer tweeted he would appeal to the NZ Supreme Court.

205 comments

  1. wow by cholby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that's disgusting. US laws now World Laws? I'm expat soon

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, different countries sign extradition treaties with each other for a variety of reasons. In many cases, countries seek favorable trade agreements with the US in exchange. The US is especially interested in copyright and IP law since it is a strong export of ours. If IP law is not enforced internationally, the US stands to suffer a huge economic blow (regardless of whether you think it is moral, this is an economic fact)

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with "the U.S. imposing laws on the rest of the world".

      MegaUpload had servers located in the U.S. If you commit a crime in Country A, you shouldn't be able to escape just by running off to Country B. That's the whole point of extradition treaties.

      That said, the case against Kim.Com is mostly just RIAA/MPAA Mafia bullshit, claiming that they lost gazillions of dollars due to "piracy". Unfortunately, like many pirates, Kim.Com may have been involved in other illegal activities as well, which strengthens the U.S. case against him.

    3. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mega served lots of malware-infested ads in addition to their piracy.

    4. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also his name was Dotcom, he should be executed for that alone. If I met someone and their last name was Informationsuperhighway I'd call the police.

    5. Re:wow by Desprez · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DID MegaUpload host data in the US though?

      I've seen some info about servers being transported to the US for the prosecution, which means those, at least, weren't in the US to begin with. But I didn't immediately find any info if some were already operating here.

    6. Re:wow by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

      > the case against Kim.Com is mostly just RIAA/MPAA Mafia bullshit, claiming that they lost gazillions of dollars due to "piracy".

      Not "mostly just" but IS bullshit.

      Where does Piracy show-up in their quarterly financial statements?

    7. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's disgusting. US laws now World Laws? I'm expat soon

      You must be mentally deficient if you think becoming an expat will make any difference in your life, when the US has repeatedly demonstrated that it can and will hunt down people anywhere in the world and do with them as it wishes. You can be just as free or "un-free" anywhere. There has never been less advantage to being an expat than there is today. By the way, unless you RENOUNCE your US citizenship, you will still have to pay US taxes on your income. I bet you didn't know that, did you, little wannabe expat ?

      Of course you're not really going anywhere anyway, you're just another whiner on the internet. Swallow that truth like a good boy, now.

    8. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kill yourself you retarded cuck

    9. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to evade US laws go to countries that do not have extradition agreements with the US. You could be perfectly safe from extradition living in Russia, China, NK, Iran, and a few other countries. However depending on the seriousness of your crime your list of available countries shrink. If the charges are serious like murder, acts of terror, or human trafficking you need to select a country the US cannot just drop a SEAL team on your ass in the middle of the night and make a quick exit.

    10. Re:wow by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shh, don't remind the rest of the world too much because it will pretty much gaurantee a global shrinking of copyright laws. The US has sanctioned so much it has become the norm and everyone is simply adapting to trading around them. Keep this up and it will not be all that long before the US is the one sanctioned, closer than you think. Want to be a pack of muderous cunts don't be surprised when the rest of the world start treating you like a pack of murderous cunts.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really now, where you going to run to, someplace safe like NZ?

    12. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How odd.

      YouTube has servers in the USA which provide gigabytes of infringing content, care to mansplain why they aren't being prosecuted?

      Or are you just a mindless RIAA shill?

    13. Re:wow by Luckyo · · Score: 0

      Yes. Privilege of being a global hegemon who's defence umbrella and guarantees of free maritime trade states like NZ need for survival.

    14. Re:wow by youngone · · Score: 1

      MegaUpload had servers located in the U.S.

      Nope. Their servers were in Hong Kong.
      As far as I can tell Megaupload had no presence in the US at all.
      Also, despite the latest ruling, the NZ Police have already apologised to Kim Dotcom and paid him compensation for their illegal raid.
      I am at a loss as to why copyright infringement is even a criminal offense.

    15. Re:wow by jrumney · · Score: 1

      By "mostly just RIAA/MPAA mafia bullshit", you mean they are engaged in the same thing, right? The charges he is being extradited on are racketeering, fraud and money laundering. These are criminal charges, pursued by the FBI. The civil charges of copyright infringement are not eligible for extradition.

    16. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Megaupload servers run by Cogent and Carpathia Hosting were located within the US which was why the EFF spent time trying to force the US government to reopen the servers for users who didn't post infringing material.

    17. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, life is way better as an expat. America is a police state with a mostly collapsed economy. Asia is headed up up up in the world. The ambient mood here is great.

      But add others have pointed out, it's hard to escape the long arm of the badlaws. If you offend the financial nobility, black-clad law enforcers will kidnap you and drag you back to a kangaroo court that's 100% certain to railroad you into the Gulag. Unless you live in one of the handful of countries that still has de facto territorial sovereignty: Russia, China, Iran, North Korea... maybe a few more?

    18. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be the all the countries we defend for free? The countries that have pathetic, incompetent militaries?

      Germany with it's one... wait scratch that.... Zero active submarines? LOL

    19. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you frightened by foreign lands having sovereignty?

    20. Re: wow by WorBlux · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Precisely zero. If I copy your bike, you still have a bike. Granting government enforced monopolies is far from the only, or even best, way of rewarding creativity and innovation.

    21. Re:wow by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      No. International arrest warrant -> NZ obeys international rules.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    22. Re: wow by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You could be perfectly safe from extradition living in Russia, China, NK, Iran, and a few other countries.

      Any of which would be perfectly happy turning you over to whomever they fucking choose.

    23. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kim pissed off WAY too many rich and powerful people. No legal technicality will save him. He is doomed.

    24. Re:wow by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      If you commit a crime in Country A, you shouldn't be able to escape just by running off to Country B. That's the whole point of extradition treaties.

      OK, I need to ask then, George W. Bush re-framed the entire US constitution into a wartime stance on the signature of his lawyer, not the Attorney General. Why can't he be extradited for war crimes against Iraq?

      Can anyone explain to me exactly why the US is *still* in Iraq now that OBL is dead?

      And why talking about a nobody like Kim.Com is any more relevant than that?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    25. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They're accused of literally transferring money to the US, transferring it between each using the US banking system, and traveling in person to the US to take actions involving this money.

      Everything they're accused of happened in the US. Maybe you spend too much time on reddit, but nothing about this story involves the US caring about where the network data was routed.

    26. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      Their fat asses were present in the US to withdraw the money in furtherance of their conspiracy, money that they were receiving for actions that violate US law.

      If the horseshit you ate in your echo chamber was higher quality, you'd know that. People mislead you by pointing at the servers, why? Because the location of the servers isn't relevant to the case. That's why they gave you that information; because it's not relevant. Gee, why would they do that? If you understood you'd be less credulous of what your friends tell you.

      It is true that if they had gone and done it in a place where it was legal, they wouldn't be arrested. But they didn't do it all in a place like that; parts of it they did in the US.

    27. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Iraq won't let the US leave. That's why. They insist they still need security assistance, they're not willing to force their troops fight by themselves, and they aren't able to maintain control of their land without constant warfare.

    28. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kill yourself you retarded cuck

      Now, now, you KNOW it is YOU who needs to commit suicide.

      Me ? I'll stick around and laugh at the miserable worthless lives of faggots like you.

    29. Re:wow by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem plausible, I couldn't find a single article supporting that position and, it doesn't answer the other two questions.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    30. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a big kerfuffle about it not too many years ago actually if memory serves. YouTube had to put in a lot of checks to try and identify infringing content to make them happy.

      My guess is mega was not willing to do any of that.

    31. Re:wow by james_gnz · · Score: 2

      Yes, the US is seeking extradition over the transfer of money in the US, not copyright infringement. Of course, the transfer of money is not itself illegal. It is only illegal if there was copyright infringement. However copyright infringement doesn't warrant extradition. Hence the need to seek extradition though tack-on charges instead.

      However, to answer the previous poster, yes, I believe the relevant server was in the US (which raises the question of why there was a need for an armed raid in NZ). The electronics that was taken from NZ was personal stuff, such as personal computers, and the security system with video footage of the raid.

    32. Re: wow by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      The value in this case is not the bike but its design. If you would have paid €10 for the design but instead copied his bike for free, he’s out €10. If the design isn’t worth anything to you, he’s out €0. But if you let 10 of your friends build bikes from your copy, he’s out a further €50 on average. That’s the reasoning of rights holders anyway (except in the US where they would claim those 10 copies represent €12 billion in lost revenue). I agree with that reasoning and I think that having some form of copyright is a good thing, but it needs to be changed to serve its purpose: not rewarding creativity, but fostering it. For starters: by capping the duration at the life of the author. He is the one that needs incentives to create and publish, but if he is dead, that need is gone.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    33. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You can't find the story because my frank synopsis doesn't match the propaganda of either side. You'd have to actually read the stories that report on the negotiations between the two countries about troop levels, over a period of 10 years, to understand it. Afghanistan has similar issues, too, but they can't get as much ongoing assistance because they don't cooperate well enough. (e.g., too many of their soldiers turn out to be enemies)

      Regarding the unanswered questions, one was flamebait, and the other was whataboutism.

    34. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter when the original thing you did wrong was. When you do something a little bit naughty, but you use international banking systems to do, it might be felony fraud in any of the countries whose banks you used. And when you have a group of people doing something naughty together as a group, and even flying to a foreign country to move money around, yeah, only idiots on the internet care that original thing would have only been a little bit naughty if one person was doing it. None of the people whose opinions matter (lawyers, judges, diplomats) care about that, they care about the more-bad parts that were named.

    35. Re:wow by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Send 'em on - I'll read em.

      Regarding the unanswered questions, one was flamebait, and the other was whataboutism.

      Well at least you agree that GWB should be indicted for war crimes - at least we can agree on that.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    36. Re:wow by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      The US is especially interested in copyright and IP law since it is a strong export of ours.

      While true, it has zero to do with this case where the USA is going after extradition solely for fraud, rakateering and money laundering.
      Naturally you can expect the deal to change once he actually gets on US soil, but the copyright claims are so flakey against him that there is pretty much a zero chance that he would have been extradited on that alone if the USA didn't conjure up some more charges.

      Mind you if that's all there is then I'm sure we'd all be okay with it. How does the USA trade agreements suddenly allow mishandling of data, siezing of funds of a foreign national, and generally contempt of a foreign court / political system.

      Kim Dotcom is an arse. He probably has it coming. But no one should be defending this process through which he is getting his comeuppance.

    37. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be the all the countries we defend for free?

      You are stupid to defend them for free. You should charge them what it costs plus a good profit!

    38. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Still Dotcom's prosecution has violated all moral standards, it's been a farce right from the start. Note that countries never have to extradite and that the US has often chosen not to extradite their citizens in the past. Extradition treaties are for capital crimes like rape and murder, not for religious issues like "This guy facilitated copyright infringement like thousands of others but made the mistake of being an asshole and not wearing a tie." Because that's what this is about, somebody didn't conform with the expectations. Meanwhile, Google and Youtube continue to serve you all the pirated stuff you need.

      In my opinion, countries should halt their extradition treaties with the US until the US has made at least some efforts to fix their (in-)justice system, starts to warrant basic human rights in their penal system - no more prison rape or forced labor -, and abandons plea bargains based on stacking accusations.

      Quite honestly, if sentences for the same crimes in your country are on average 10 times longer than in every other civilized country on earth and if every second citizen makes "don't drop the soap" jokes about prison, this should give you reason to pause and think about your system. I personally wouldn't care as long as I could be certain that I cannot be accused of idiotic crimes in the US as someone who has never and will never set foot on US soil, but the Dotcom case unfortunately shows that this is not the case.

      You wouldn't want North Korean law to apply in the US either, would you?

    39. Re: wow by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      What is "creation" really anyways? Can anybody do it or do we really need that specific first person?

    40. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets prosecute IPS while we are at it. And lets prosecute local municipalities fro providing roads that provide logisitcs for ISP!!!

    41. Re: wow by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      The theory for patents is that the first person has earned a reward for creating a superior design, and that granting a license over that design gets the design into common usage much sooner, to the benefit of all mankind. The theory for copyrights is somewhat different. The short copyright befits there were for publishers and authors, to reward and encourage them to publish new works as well. Otherwise the authors received nothing, no matter how broadly their books might be published.

      However, copyright was also about _preventing_ publication. In particular, it controlled publication of the Bible. Controlling the Bible's publication meant keeping it in the hands of only the authorized staff of the church that owned the copyrights, so only they could provide and interpret teachings from it. It also meant that modified Bibles that might include other holy writings, or modified writings, were forbidden. We see similar control today for textbooks: copyright prevents modifying them to modify the lessons and present the re-interpretations as being from the author. Copyright is actually an important factor in controlling misquoting, as well as in protecting income for authors and publishers.

    42. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But if you let 10 of your friends build bikes from your copy, he’s out a further €50 on average.

      That's called competition, and is generally considered a good thing in capitalism.

    43. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YouTube has servers in the USA which provide gigabytes of infringing content, care to mansplain why they aren't being prosecuted?

      Because it's not just the servers that are in the US. Youtube the company is also in the US.

      Youtube is moving billions, that makes it a large scale crime. Just like the banksters that caused the recent financial collapse and even war crimes, only foreign criminals will be prosecuted.

    44. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their fat asses were present in the US to withdraw the money in furtherance of their conspiracy, money that they were receiving for actions that violate US law.

      So you are fine with US journalists and media bosses to be extradited to let's say Saudi Arabia just because some of the money they made by breaking Saudi law (attempting freedom of speech is a big no-no there) just happened to pass through Saudi Arabia?

    45. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you can't copy a bike using zero resources your point is invalid.

    46. Re: wow by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Selling bikes involves production costs for making bikes. Selling copyrighed stuff is almost free. The Rich want the highest profit margins possible. Of course enforcing copyright is expensive, but that's paid by the government not the Rich. Privatize the profit, Socialize the cost.

    47. Re:wow by retchdog · · Score: 1

      uh maybe he's going to expatriate to the US? kind of a risky move at this point, but it might still pay off in the long-run, at least if he doesn't look hispanic. US domestic policy is still not quite as nightmarish as US foreign policy.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    48. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

    49. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany has six active submarines.

    50. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you believe he is an arse and has it coming. Are you upset you do not have the cajons that Kim Dotcom has?

    51. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we are picking nits in such a reckless fashion, then please go on, show me at least one thing that you can copy expending zero resources on your end.
      Exactly, nothing! Even copying data requires some resources in a universe that follows the laws of thermodynamics - doofus. If you copy a song you need hardware to do it. Someone has to build that hardware from other resources. You probably need electricity that has to be generated from resources. The same goes for playback devices.

    52. Re: wow by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Many jurisdiction treat moral rights separately, the rights of attribution and integrity of the work. You don't need to grant an exclusive license on copying to secure them, and certainly not a grant that lasts over a century.

    53. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should look into the reasons for that. Who 'encouraged' Germany after WW2 to not have a capable military?

    54. Re: wow by harperska · · Score: 1

      That sort of calculation makes a huge assumption as to the design's economic value. Everything from bikes to bars of gold has value only because someone wants it and is willing to give a certain amount of their own wealth in exchange for it relative to how much they want it. In the case of your bike, there is a very good chance that the person willing to give €0 for the bike would have no interest in it at €10. So it is disingenuous to say that the seller is out €10 due to the copy because he would have received €0 whether the copy was made or not.

    55. Re:wow by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      The treaty stated that the US would get Kim Dot Com and New Zealand would get Peter Jackson's LotR. Because New Zealand didn't produce Kim Dot Com when initially asked they were punished with The Hobbit.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    56. Re: wow by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      To reward creativity? What about the creativity of my friends who changed the design for their own purposes, the one that implemented a cool color scheme, the one that added an electric boost, and the one who scaled the design 5x for the sheer ridiculousness of it? Having a rich, well populated commons gives more people the tools to be creative.

      How creative is a single business plan anyways? Why not sell merch related to the design, charge for customization services, sell the first design for a lot of money, sell design services to bike manufacturers that have the tooling and supply chain to beat out most home shops? I'm not convinced copyright is needed for creative endeavors.

      And even if it's true you want to reward creativity that has a cost, in terms of lawyers, courts, and keeping ideas and tools from the public domain, and the cost of discouraging amateurs who often start by modifying or sampling works from more developed artists. The terms granted are far too long by any rational analysis. 80% of works achieve over 80% of their revenue in the first decade after date of publication. The life of the author is probably too long, and wildly varies the expected reward by author's age. 10 years, with an option to renew each 10 years for an amount affordably for wildly successful works say, $500, $5000, $50,000, $100,000, $150,000, $200,0000.... with anual cost of living adjustments.

    57. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter if they were hosted in the US.
      Or if he committed crimes in the US remotely.

      The NZ Supreme Court will rightly find that his actions are legal under NZ law, therefore he is innocent.

      Extradition is just some bullshit between fucked up governments and giant corporations so that other countries can come and jail you for life for pissant remote shit that doesn't matter like copyright and hacking and superior business competition.

    58. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      At least we agreed that you don't understand English, so it isn't like you didn't understand any of the words at all. That's something.

    59. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Expat" to avoid US laws becoming World Laws...so...you're going to another planet?

    60. Re:wow by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      If only there were laws that gave such hosting providers such protection. You could call it a safe harbor, and add a whole bunch of hoops to jump through in order to qualify for it. Then youtube could jump through those hoops and avoid civil infringement and not willfully violate copyrights in order to avoid criminal infringement.

       

    61. Re:wow by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I said I would consider your POV if you sent supporting materials. Since you can't support the one statement you made with any fact the only logical conclusion is that it is fiction designed to justify US presence in those countries as the one point you answered. I won't be wasting cognitive effort trying to validate your position.

      Essentially your saying that an Iraqi or Afghani military presence in New York or the rest of the world having military bases in every state in the US to sort out your domestic disputes is justifiable using your reasoning. Newsflash: The US is the invader and the rest of the world would like you a whole lot better if you just went home and mind your own business. You seem somewhat obsessed with the idea of the US Empire. You keep your bases and I'll head off to the doctor to get my hurt feelings checked for free.

      As for your claim of Whataboutism you've unsuccessfully attempted to invert my position. I don't need to accuse the US of hypocrisy because everybody outside the US can already observe that. Why do I need to disprove if Kim.Com faces court for copying a few shit movies when it has been established that GWB committed crimes against humanity, that's how the rest of the world views him. My viewpoint is already supported by law so the accusation has already been directly refuted.

      Also US law, as according to the U.S. constitution, the U.S. president is responsible for all actions carried out by the executive, therefore, George W. Bush is responsible for the torture methods used by U.S. authorities, such as waterboarding. So what you're suggesting is that its ok to use these methods on US citizens the same way the US uses them on international citizens - or are you a hypocrite?

      Or are you suggesting is that it's ok for the US to use these methods against US citizens - or are you a hypocrite?

      Or is it more reasonable that the person responsible for bringing that shame on American citizens take responsibility for their crimes - or are you a hypocrite?

      At least we agreed that you don't understand English, so it isn't like you didn't understand any of the words at all. That's something.

      As for your accusations of flamebait, maybe, you bit, I've still given you a way out. As for my command of the English language I think I've demonstrated a suitable excoriation of your pithy ramblings to adequately provoke an emotional response in you with only half my wit, which is clearly double yours. I gave you a graceful, humorous way out so that you wouldn't look like a hypocrite but you were too stupid to take it. So feel free to go ahead, demonstrate you're a hypocrite and defend torturing people.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    62. Re:wow by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      what do you mean "now" ? they raided the place with more police and swat than they did Obama Sim Laden they do it all over the world all the time xept maybe in china or russia lol problem is, those places are hard to get into

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    63. Re:wow by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      pardon my swift reply i wasnt done yet (slashdot : the original blockchain forum : thou shalt not censor thyself lol) seriously, they hack angela merkels phone, "DAS MAEDCHEN" , the most powerful woman in the world at that time ... was there any repercussion ? AT ALL ? nope is cmdr Taco coming back yet ?

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    64. Re:wow by james_gnz · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter when the original thing you did wrong was. When you do something a little bit naughty, but you use international banking systems to do, it might be felony fraud in any of the countries whose banks you used. And when you have a group of people doing something naughty together as a group, and even flying to a foreign country to move money around, yeah, only idiots on the internet care that original thing would have only been a little bit naughty if one person was doing it.

      Money laundering charges were intended to prevent people from using transactions to obscure the origin of money obtained through the black-market, such as cash obtained from drug dealing. They were not intended as general tack-on charges to anything, or as a means for prosecutors to convert civil cases into criminal ones.

      None of the people whose opinions matter (lawyers, judges, diplomats) care about that, they care about the more-bad parts that were named.

      Prosecutors love money-laundering laws, but defence not so much.

    65. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If they go to Saudi Arabia and commit crimes there, they do go to jail there.

      That is the way the world works.

      You're choosing journalists, but actually yes journalists do get arrested if they go to foreign countries and, while still in that country, write stuff that is illegal in that place. Instead, they go and visit, see what they see, and go home, then they write the story from their own country.

      If they open bank accounts in Saudi Arabia, and use those bank accounts to receive payment for their work, and receiving payment for that type of work is illegal in Saudi Arabia, then yes they would risk ending up in a jail there. It is really that simple.

      You don't seem to comprehend that they traveled to the US to make transactions that are illegal here, and directed people here to make transactions that they knew were illegal here. Journalists don't do that, they receive payment in countries where their work is legal.

    66. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You don't get to decide what the purposes of money-laundering laws are.

      We have a legislature who passes those laws, and we vote on who is in the legislature.

      You'd prefer to just tell us what our laws are or why we have them, but you don't matter that much in the world; the range of activities that the current money-laundering laws are designed to combat is something you would learn by listening, not something you would decide by thinking or arguing.

    67. Re:wow by youngone · · Score: 1
      Wow, that's an angry reply.
      I'm not sure what you mean by echo chamber, I'm basing what I know about Megaupload on what the local media has reported, and I don't remember any mention of transactions in the US. I am happy to be proven wrong however, if you can provide a link? I couldn't find anything.

      It seems odd to me that a Hong Kong company, run by a New Zealand resident (along with a bunch of Europeans) would do any financial transactions in the US.

    68. Re:wow by james_gnz · · Score: 1

      This seems relevant:

      Adams (2000) Tacking on money laundering charges to white collar crimes: What did congress intend, and what are the courts doing?
      https://readingroom.law.gsu.ed...

    69. Re:wow by Baki · · Score: 1

      Indeed, which is why I see the current US isolationism as beneficial for the world.

      In the short term world trade will suffer and we'll all become a bit poorer, but in the long term, dismantling the US dominance over global trade is super!

    70. Re:wow by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I read half the first senctence, "I said I would consider your POV if you sent supporting materials. Since you can't support the one statement you made with any fact the only logical conclusion..."

      Why read more? If you start with that, why would you think your words have value?

      Neither of us are encyclopedias. I'm not going to hand-feed you supporting materials. If you don't know how to look things up using resources you trust, take a fucking class in study skills at the community college. Don't ask me to do it for you. If you're so credulous of whatever pap people feed you that you'd want me to "support" your thinking in that way, that already tells me you can't comprehend the ideas that I expressed. Using logical principles. A person who can't do that, also isn't going to provide a response that has value to me. I would rather write words only I will read, than to read words that just regurgitate some mix of crap.

    71. Re: wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is anyway, not anyways. Doh!

    72. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rakateering? You what? So you play tennis with a what? a rakat?

    73. Re:wow by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I read half the first senctence,

      Judging from the emotional reactions you've provided, you read the entire thing over and over and it took you a few days to calm down, so it's clear they have an element of truth and you feel like a hypocrite for supporting this war.

      Why read more? If you start with that, why would you think your words have value?

      Because they already *have* had value, it's just not one you can recognize. However I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt because I think you have been deceived by your media.

      I'm not going to hand-feed you supporting materials.

      Calm down, there is no need to have a temper tantrum, its an adolescent technique of someone who cannot support their argument. I'd be able to argue your side of the argument better with a few nights of study anyway so that is what I decided to do.

      If you don't know how to look things up using resources you trust, take a fucking class in study skills at the community college. Don't ask me to do it for you.

      If you're feeling emotional about this then it's probably a sign that you are being manipulated by the media and thinking is hard for you because of mental atrophy. It's pretty common so don't take it personally, I'll help you with a mental workout instead.

      My preference is for referring to acts of law to determine the behaviour of government, not the press or other sources as I find they are swayed to much by emotion and inaccuracies. So I looked up the legal agreements dictating the US presence in Iraq, the Status of Forces Agreement. A pretty interesting read so thanks for the opportunity to evolve my argument. I also looked up the US Inventory of Bi-Lateral Treaties and the Declaration of Principles where the US spells out it terms for the occupation, invasion, police action, "call it anything but a war" "Long term relationship" with Iraq. Very interesting indeed, a great opportunity for evolving my arguments even further.

      Do you think the US Government website and the White House are sources I can trust? It saves me time not having to sift through the inconsequential media mindgames you've sourced this claim that Iraq needs the US. I can see the rhetoric designed into the legal documents are breathtakingly presumptuous and nothing in those documents suggest a legal premise for Iraq requesting any assistance. The US assuming legal control of parts of the country, exonerating yourselves from local laws, spreading DU all over the country with no clear legal military premise. Iraq offered the US everything not to have the shit kicked out of them, again, by the US. They're not even muslim, they're christians so how do they make islamic terrorists?

      Since you bought up whataboutism", I'm not a soviet, I'm one of your allies so I'm perfectly entitled to call you out on it since my government is telling me that we are obliged to stay there with you under the premise of military agreements we have with you. I'm embarrassed that my country is still there side by side as a friend and ally to the U.S in Iraq. So why are you continuing to oblige US for our help with this? It's was wrong 17 or whatever years ago and it is wrong now. This is really bad stuff, and I don't understand why America and Americans need to shame themselves like this.

      If you're so credulous of whatever pap people feed you that you'd want me to "support" your thinking in that way, that already tells me you can't comprehend the ideas that I expressed.

      I think credulity is the issue here because the idea that you actually are being manipulated by your media is a terrifying idea, your emotional reactions to this discussion and inability to respond rationally to a typed arg

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  2. time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and hold out somewhere else that doesn't extradite.
    Maybe Snowden would like some company?

    1. Re:time for him to pick another country by DaHat · · Score: 2

      He would need to leave the country to do that... and I imagine given his current state, the Kiwi authorities probably would prevent him from getting on an airplane.

      Sure, he could take a boat... though that's a ~1300 mile trip and there isn't all that much passenger traffic back and forth.

    2. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously Russia has more sane leaders and much more freedom at this point in time. I would tend to agree.

    3. Re:time for him to pick another country by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The case against him is honestly a bit trumped up, they are basically trying to prosecute him for offering a legitimate service a-la Google Drive, DropBox, icloud, etc and the government is going to be faced with trying to prove his service only offered infringing services (because valid uses for the service mean it's legal, just like the government can't ban ownership of crowbars). Providing he's already funded some good lawyers with prepaid retainers before he's extradited he's got pretty good odds of beating the Government in court. Hopefully he's used the delay in this extradition well.

      The government case against him was always built on a quick extradition, seizure of his assets so he couldn't' retain good counsel and a quick plea deal. By delaying the extradition he put himself in position to beat this charge if he was smart and put those retainers in place ASAP. If he's got retainers in place when he's extradited I wouldn't be surprised to see the government drop the case because they know they can't beat him for offering services that hundreds of other companies offer.

      This was a prosecution put forward by entertainment companies as a threat to others using federal prosecutors with connections to hollywood and the music industry, they destroyed a valid business with it and my hope is the delay in extradition allows him to stomp the prosecution then go after the return of assets the government seized, particularly the $100's of millions in dollars they siezed. Don't get me wrong, Dot-com is a dickhead grifter, but what he did didn't deserve what he got. This was a total railroading butffuck that they hoped would scare him into a plea deal by getting NZ to disregard it's own laws.

    4. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the shortest trip from New Zealand to Australia is 2,587 miles. Now normally a New Zealand resident has no trouble entering Australia, but if he's actually fleeing the country then he might potentially run into additional issues regarding Australian laws against accepting refugees who arrive by boat.

    5. Re:time for him to pick another country by DaHat · · Score: 1

      because valid uses for the service mean it's legal, just like the government can't ban ownership of crowbars

      Just because a legal use exists doesn't ignore how it is used illegally, or the proportionality of legal/illegal use.

      There are plenty of legal reasons to have a hidden compartment in your car... you know, to store valuables when you are away from your vehicle... of course, if the police find out you build them or have one, you may be headed to jail for assisting the drug trade: https://www.wired.com/2013/03/...

      they can't beat him for offering services that hundreds of other companies offer.

      Plenty of people own apartment buildings, some of those building have illegal activity occurring in/around it. Some owners ignore it... those owners too are risking losing what they have by being complicit in the activities.

    6. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 900.

    7. Re: time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah... lotta badlaws in our country. Sad.

    8. Re:time for him to pick another country by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      time for him

      Time expired. He had to move earlier.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    9. Re:time for him to pick another country by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      He's too big to smuggle onto a boat, though. It isn't like he's going to kayak out to a yacht and slip away, they'd have to load at some sort of dock.

      A Hutt never flees, they always shelter in place.

    10. Re:time for him to pick another country by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Just because you didn't read the reporting about what charges he faces, doesn't mean that whatever your friends told you about it must be true.

      They have websites on the internet where they link to news stories, it is probably possible to find out what he's charged with.

      Extraditions are always pretty quick, because as the NZ court explained, they're not trials! The purpose is to check the paperwork, and compare it to the treaty. That's it. Fighting extradition is an expensive delay tactic with no chance of eventual success.

      Prosecutions aren't even put forwards by companies in the US. You can look this stuff up, if you're curious. Or don't if you're not. But there is no reason to just internalize a bunch of horseshit as if it is knowledge.

    11. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a legal use exists doesn't ignore how it is used illegally, or the proportionality of legal/illegal use.

      There are plenty of legal reasons to have a hidden compartment in your car... you know, to store valuables when you are away from your vehicle... of course, if the police find out you build them or have one, you may be headed to jail for assisting the drug trade: https://www.wired.com/2013/03/...

      Plenty of people own apartment buildings, some of those building have illegal activity occurring in/around it. Some owners ignore it... those owners too are risking losing what they have by being complicit in the activities.

      Does the CEO of Smith and Wesson go to jail because people commit crimes with the guns "he" produces?
      Does Colt's CEO go to jail because of how the AR-15 is used in school shootings or Las Vegas hotels?

      You seem to be under the impression that the expression "Rob a million and you go to jail. Rob 1 billion and you're just a Wall Street banker" is totally fine and that there's no issue there...

    12. Re:time for him to pick another country by hankwang · · Score: 2

      "prosecute him for offering a legitimate service a-la Google Drive, DropBox, icloud, etc "

      As I recall, Megaupload was actively subverting the DMCA takedown process by not actually deleting content from their servers, but rather changing the download URLs and having farms of sockpuppets post the new links. If it turned out that Dropbox does this, they would be in deep trouble as well.

    13. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, Megaupload was actively subverting the DMCA takedown process

      Stop right there.

      The DMCA is US domestic law. It is not international law.

      What Dotcom actually did was threaten large US companies both in the entertainment and hosting industries like Google/Youtube and others. The authorities got worried because companies like Google/Youtube and most others were under US law and control either by being domestic or in a nation under treaty/trade agreements with the US. Not having the millstone of onerous US regulations around the neck of MU also gave it a competitive edge against US competition. Plus, MegaUpload was being run by an unpredictable person they could not easily control.

      Added up, Dotcom and MU simply grew to be perceived as a threat to the status quo and established control too big to be tolerated any longer and was taken out, the legalities & methods be damned.

      Hey USians, wasn't it one of your guys that said something about 'when people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty'? Whatever happened to that concept over there?

      Oh right...dope, fast-food, and Netflix. Never mind.

    14. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > The case against him is honestly a bit trumped up, they are basically trying to prosecute him for offering a legitimate service a-la Google Drive, DropBox, icloud, etc.

      Yes, cases like this always felt like they were more about preventing competition by overseas companies against US tech giants if anything.

      When a US tech giant allows or enables piracy, they're told at worst to sit down and work it out. When a foreign tech company does the exact same thing, they're treated as a criminal organisation and their CEO and directors are extradited and jailed. The US often uses extra-territorial laws to prevent market competition of it's major corporations - we saw it with things like the fines against BP where it was forced to pay grossly disproportionate compensation compared to oil spills by US oil companies such as Exxon Valdez which was far more damaging environmentally even if was a smaller spill, we saw it with BAE that was fined for bribery to get contracts, whilst Boeing was given a free ride to do the exact same thing.

      America's legal system is one of it's key economic weapons in giving US companies a massive advantage in global trade, and this is just another fine example. YouTube becoming a multi-billion dollar company off the back of copyrighted material, much of it not even US material = Ok, Kim DotCom trying to do the same thing = Criminal offense resulting in complete confiscation of everything he owned + extradition to face a US kangaroo court.

    15. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dropbox does precisely that, except for the part that you made up about sockpuppets. The basis of cheap cloud storage is signature based duplication of files among different subscribers. Dropbox can't delete all instances of the latest film as some users have that in their personal storage that they are using for shifting between owned devices all having limited storage. When those files get shared illicitly they remove the link to the main file and leave the legitimate users alone.

      If dropbox and others stopped treating everyone's files as part of the global storage system, they would need to increase prices dramatically.

    16. Re:time for him to pick another country by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Sure, he could take a boat...

      Are you unaware of who we're talking about here? It's this guy. Even though they seized a lot of his assets, I think he's still outside of the "take a boat" class of wealthy. Yacht? Sure. Private sea plane? Yes.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    17. Re:time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DMCA is not a New Zealand Law. It's as irrelevant as Comcast not enforcing the Great Firewall of China.

    18. Re: time for him to pick another country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go and smell your feet

  3. Hard to pick sides by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know I should side with Kim. But ... it's hard to side with Kim. Every time I do, I feel like recounting my fingers to see whether I still have all of them.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you think you should side with someone who made millions off of enabling piracy of other people's work? Copyright has gone too far, but that doesn't make it OK to make millions through piracy.

    2. Re:Hard to pick sides by benjfowler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, his arse is so big, there's no room left on his side. All good -- he'll lose some weight in jail.

      In all seriousness, you can't be an obnoxious, arrogant Russophile tosser like Kim, and not expect consequences. Life comes at you fast.

    3. Re:Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears to come at him faster than usual because he's too fat to run.

    4. Re:Hard to pick sides by Pseudonym · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because even the sleaziest people in the world are, sometimes, legally in the right.

      Kim Dotcom's civil rights are the civil rights of anyone else in New Zealand. I don't live in New Zealand, but that's not relevant. As an Australian, I care that my New Zealand cousins are treated properly and ethically by their legal system.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:Hard to pick sides by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Informative

      He's not one of your New Zealand cousins. He's from Germany, and he also has a Finnish passport. He's very much abusing the hospitality of New Zealand, as a guest who brought a great deal of legal and political trouble with him.

    6. Re:Hard to pick sides by MoaDweeb · · Score: 2

      I am from NZ. Kim Dotcom has had a fair suck of the sav' and appealed everything to the Supreme Court, nothing wrong with that.
      He is also appealing this decision to the Supreme Court as well, good luck there.
      If that is unsuccessful then he will appeal to the Minister of Immigration and then he will be deported (Minister hardly ever changes the decision).

      He has been well served by our Court system and will have to abide by the consequences, trumped up charges or not.

      As far as the charges themselves go, yeah bit dodgy and our previous Govt wanted to suck US c*** over that.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    7. Re: Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat shaming and victim shaming in one post. Nice work shithead!

    8. Re:Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not one of your New Zealand cousins.

      While the GP was ambiguous on the point, the issue of native or non-native New Zealanders applies to all within its jurisdiction.

      He's from Germany, and he also has a Finnish passport. He's very much abusing the hospitality of New Zealand, as a guest who brought a great deal of legal and political trouble with him.

      It's funny. The one who brought a great deal of legal and political trouble was the US as the're the ones seek extradition and New Zealand's government which has seemingly done a variety of questionably legal and ethical things. The seeming goal is to be sleazier than Kim Dotcom. I'm not sure how you can transfer their actions onto a person who should be presumed innocent.

    9. Re: Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He made millions by liberating cultural data. What you tut tut as "piracy", the masses consider virtuous.

      Copyright and intellectual monopoly of all sorts make the whole world stupider, just so that a handful of rich capitalists can make bigger profits. Down with copyright!

    10. Re:Hard to pick sides by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      He's not one of your New Zealand cousins.

      The AC respondent correctly interpreted my meaning. If the New Zealand legal system mistreats anyone, that's a problem for New Zealanders.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    11. Re:Hard to pick sides by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Kia ora, mate.

      Your response checks out. It's easily the most New Zealand thing I've seen all day.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    12. Re:Hard to pick sides by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I know I should side with Kim.

      Just because you hear the echo, doesn't mean you're supposed to believe it. Golly.

    13. Re:Hard to pick sides by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Legal cases should be decided based on the merits of the law. Not based on factors which aren't relevant to the legal issue at hand, like the nationality or personality of the accused.

      New Zealand needs to decide if a legal resident in their country can be extradited to face copyright infringement charges abroad when he has (apparently) broken no New Zealand laws. Nothing more, nothing less. Ask yourself if the case would still be at trial if he were a NZ citizen with an upstanding civil record. If so, then everything negative about Kim Dotcom is irrelevant. Only his legal presence in the country, and his business activities with respect to copyright.

    14. Re:Hard to pick sides by MobileC · · Score: 1

      And he has NZ citizenship.

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    15. Re:Hard to pick sides by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      He's not one of your New Zealand cousins. He's from Germany

      And currently under the purview of the New Zealand legal system. If he was only governed by all things German he would never be extradited to the USA for this since Germany constitutionally protects its citizens against this.

      Abuse of hospitality is something someone does when they get a benefit from someone else. He's infinitely worse off for being in NZ.

      By the way. I am currently in Germany. I fully expect that if I walk down the street making a Nazi salutes at everyone while denying the holocaust happened that I shouldn't be arrested because I'm not German? Are you implying that laws shouldn't apply to foreigners at all, or that only the laws that allow a government to lock someone up, but not the laws that afford any protection should apply?

    16. Re:Hard to pick sides by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What echo?

      My motivation to side with Kim is due to my hatred for his opponent, not my love for him. As far as I'm concerned, it's a bit like the most recent US election where I was unsure which of the two tossers I hate more.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels.
      For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.
              H. L. Mencken

    18. Re:Hard to pick sides by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      As best I can tell, he's been granted a permanent visa. He is not a New Zealand citizen.

    19. Re:Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a US law school professor who clarified the make-up greatly.
      However under British law, the case is tarnished because the US case is probably made up, or stemmed from illegally gained/tainted evidence.
      I presume NZ also has the tainted evidence rule in place, and probably the judge gave it insufficient weight, or decided to look the other rainbow warrior way by deciding that could be decided in the USA.

      One issue is Australia and the UK, and probably Canada have now decided illegally obtained evidence may be admissable - even if they tapped the legal councils phones or sneaked into their chanbers. This a fair trial is no longer guaranteed, and in NZ, extradition may not be covered by the tainted evidence rule.

      Extending this legal principle, all international banking intel obtained, from anywhere, must be admissable, Time to hunt international tax avoiders - and by extension the IRS can yank expats from wherever for tax fraud.

    20. Re:Hard to pick sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does youtube. What's ya point. Lets jail all of Google Alphabet. And that Facebook prick while we are at it. Oh wait, they are in bed with NSA...nevermind

  4. cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    of potential expat countries for retirement.

    1. Re:cross NZ off my list by MoaDweeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming you are American we don't want you anyway. Are you able to point out NZ on a map?

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    2. Re:cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not all stupid, you know.

      But no disagreement that many of my *choke* fellow Americans are dumber than a box of rocks.

    3. Re:cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, not to insult box of rocks.

    4. Re:cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, actually, I can point out NZ on a map. I've even vacationed there in Dunedin and gone skiing in Queenstown.

    5. Re:cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh yeah duh. You just look for the ass of the globe. Its the tiny piece of shit clinging just above the shitstain that is Australia.

    6. Re: cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your jealousy is showing.

      Don't get sick or fired now ! That'd break my fucking heart.

    7. Re:cross NZ off my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy enough. First you find Australia, then you look for the island that looks like Australia's severed penis.

    8. Re: cross NZ off my list by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      NZ is already addressing the problem of rich US natives coming in to gentrify New Zealand.

  5. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's been this way for a long time.

    Coast Guard makes seizures and arrests off the coast of Ecuador and Peru.

    Extraordinary Rendition

    Pressured/forced Extradition

    If they want you, they'll get you. But, don;t fret. You're not important and they don't care about you. You need to make or cost someone else shit loads of money to be "important".

  6. Re:He should have borrowed from Snowden's playbook by DaHat · · Score: 1

    Snowden was pretty certain from the start that the feds would be after him just as soon as the leaks came out and they put 2 & 2 together to figure out it was him, so make haste to get out as quick as he could.

    Should Kim have known from the start that eventually the feds were going to come from him? Or did he think his operation would be small enough/off the radar enough to avoid the risk of extradition?

  7. Don't keep him in a US prison! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tax payers can't afford to feed him.

  8. Headline is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    He's found extraditable due to the fraud charges, not the copyright charges, because the countries essentially share the same fraud laws. However once he's there he will face all charges. The distinction is too subtle for headline speak.

    1. Re:Headline is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On any civilised legal system, in the extradited country one can't be judged for charges other than those for which were extradited for.

      It's the US different?

    2. Re:Headline is misleading. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The haters have their panties bunched so tight, they won't comprehend that the fraud and related conspiracy charges are what bring all the jail time, once they start bleeting about copyright they can't receive any new inputs until they get distracted and switch to a new topic.

      Even after he's years into his sentence, they'll still think he's in jail for copyright, because knowing how to read and being able to do it in a way that increases knowledge are not the same thing.

    3. Re:Headline is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even after he's years into his sentence, they'll still think he's in jail for copyright, because knowing how to read and being able to do it in a way that increases knowledge are not the same thing."

      Before you spout off like that, keep in mind the fraud charges are what's being used to get him on US soil. Once he's in a US court, he will DEFINITELY stand on trial both for the fraud AND for the copyright charges. Why wouldn't they? Their sole intent here is to maximize the punishment, and the primary reason they went after him was the copyright charges, not fraud. Otherwise they wouldn't have spent years trying to hang him on copyright charges first.

    4. Re:Headline is misleading. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Once he's in a US court, he will DEFINITELY stand on trial both for the fraud AND for the copyright charges. Why wouldn't they?

      Because doing so requires prosecutors to obtain special permission from New Zealand in order to do so. If they decided to charge and prosecute Kim Dotcom for the copyright charges without seeking the permission from New Zealand then it would be in violation of extradition treaties which would make other states question whether to extradite individuals in other cases.

      https://www.justice.gov/usam/u...

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    5. Re:Headline is misleading. by Megol · · Score: 1

      Yes, it isn't civilized.

  9. I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only sometimes, and this is one of those times.

    The whole thing is a shakedown, pure and simple - the FBI-led raid had KDC's wife and children held at gunpoint because KDC "was a firearms enthusiast". Despicable that our US-Ass-Kissing Government we let ourselves get conned into this bullshit.

    How can KDC and his associates are charged with "criminal copyright"... what even is that? Did anyone ever die from a movie being downloaded?

    I sincerely hope our Supreme Court has the good sense to deny the extradition, then my shame might decrease.

    1. Re:I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You in New Zealand WILL do what the US tells you to do, and you will like it, bitch.

      Why ?

      Because MIGHT MAKES RIGHT.

    2. Re:I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      If that were true they would have bended much sooner and let U.S. navel vessels carrying nuclear arms (or even just those powered by nuclear energy) dock, which they don't do. I suspect that if push really came to shove, or if there were a large scale global conflict, they would, but otherwise they haven't allowed it since the 80's.

      It wouldn't surprise me if New Zealand has their own version of the MAFIAA who have no love for Mr. Dotcom either. Either that or there's no political capital that can be gained from refusing the U.S. on this matter. I suspect that there are more outraged greenies than there are those who are impassioned by extradition treaties. If no one in the electorate will vote you out for some particular political position, then there's no cost in holding it or perhaps something to be gained from the very few on the other side who are in favor of it.

    3. Re:I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole world is in shame right now. We let the 2% get away with the slavery of the 98%. I tried to do my part. I'm about done with all this shit. Good luck.

    4. Re:I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were no FBI agents on dotcom's property. If the NZ agents went in to the house with guns drawn, it's because they thought it was necessary. It's easy to blame the US anytime your government does something you don't like. But, at some point, you have to stop pretending you're a child and take responsibility for your own actions.

    5. Re: I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off.....its NEW ZEALAND !

      Unlike the US where 50% of the population are heavily armed criminals off their heads on drugs, NZ cops dont even carry guns normally, because they don't need to.

      So there's no fucking reason for NZ cops to swoop in on helicopters waving around AR-15's in front of some frightened kids when they're after a morbidly obese man who was wanted for fucking copyright infringement !!

      Its ridiculous.

    6. Re:I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the issue was that in order for New Zealand to make the hobbit movies they did a deal with Hollywood to go after Kim. Its dodgy as.

    7. Re:I am ashamed to be a New Zealander by dyfet · · Score: 1

      Well, he did personally insult and piss off the prime minster at one point during this from what I recall, so its not like there is a a short line of people who would not mind seeing him go in NZ.

      In this respect, the actual US case and such a trial if it does eventually occur would be like Larry Flynt all over again, where one has to hold their nose and stand up for what is right, rather than let it be about who is being wronged.

  10. Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .. because someone uploaded an mp3/movie to their friends on facebook.

    In New Zealand, copyright infringement is not illegal, its a trespass on someone's rights. So even if you believe the owner of Dropbox should be responsible for content uploaded by its users its still not a crime so no extradition should occur.

    The real eye opener here was the New Zealand governments zeal to break its own laws, to facilitate the extradition. In other words the New Zealand government committed crimes in order to obtain evidence to charge him with in the first place.

    1. Re:Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in America, family live in England. There are two things happening right now most in the US are likely not aware of (I'm not Democrat or Republican):

      1) Rapid rise of the far right in Europe due to the immigrant crisis (and rise of the far right in America). The right have always had a bit of fascism in their makeup. The left do as well, but they do it under the guise of big business. The right prefer the open marriage of government in bed with corporations (see Google and others now a part of the deep state);
      2) Rapid shift of the left going full on socialist/communist. The intolerance of the left if you don't embrace their full litany of ideologies like borderline forced affirmation and acceptance of homosexuality, abortion, political stances, immigrant rights, etc. The left simply cannot tolerate losing. Since Trump has been in office, the calls for impeachment, abusing and harassing cabinet officials, etc., has become the norm. I don't recall this happening to the left whilst Obama was in office. The left tend to be sore losers.

      These changes say two things: 1) The world is increasingly hostile to everyone, depending on who is in power; 2) The marriage of government and corporations means no one has your best interests at heart. The right doesn't and the left doesn't.

    2. Re:Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2

      The only difference between democrats and republicans is the set of rights they wish to strip from you. Neither are on your side.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    3. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of people saying the Left are sore losers now just because they are more vocal about what they see as the deterioration of freedoms and the Rights disregard of the law under this administration. The trouble is there can no longer be a proper debate without it becoming a childish /name calling affair, which has been shown as the way to do things now by the president's example. It's the Right that for decades has shouted their hate for minorities and women and now that they are in control of all 3 branches, they have the ability to create laws without any checks or balances, and that is the real threat to our democracy.

    4. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They BOTH want to take your freedoms. The right don't care about women, people of colour, or the anus-eaters wanting their "marriage rights", The left would happily divest everyone of their guns and implement sky-high taxes to pay for "free" everything. Both sides are ugly for the common man, no matter how you slice it.

    5. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble is there can no longer be a proper debate without it becoming a childish /name calling affair

      Doesn't matter.

      There is no reason whatsoever to talk with someone who constantly lies and never stands by his word.
      The only way to deal with such a person is to rely on actions alone until they put value in words again.

    6. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They BOTH want to take your freedoms. The right don't care about women, people of colour, or the anus-eaters wanting their "marriage rights"

      Well, that much have been proven by the legislation they have tried to push.
      Then there are some extreme cases on the far right that just wants to outright kill PoC and gays.

      The left would happily divest everyone of their guns and implement sky-high taxes to pay for "free" everything. Both sides are ugly for the common man, no matter how you slice it.

      That is fear mongering. There are some left wing nutjobs that wants to get rid of all guns but we have not seen anything like that from the left wing politicians.
      As for the taxes the "free" everything they want are things that are "free" in countries with a tax burden equivalent to that of the US.
      It has turned out that sick people doesn't work so they don't bring in taxes and are just a drain on society. If you treat them as quickly as possible they become a productive part of society again.
      "Free" healthcare is a system that pays for itself.
      You don't even have to look at the entire economy to get that. The US spends more tax money to subsidize health care than many countries with "free" health care.
      It is just that it costs so much more if you have insurance companies as middle men that has to take a piece of it as profit.

    7. Re:Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you mean by "left" and "right" is skewed. In my experience of several decades it's pointless to even discuss politics with most US citizens on the Internet. Most of them don't even know what "liberal" as in "liberalism" means, let alone being able to distinguish left-wing from right-wing liberalism, or to understand and correctly apply terms like "anarchism", "fascism", "communism", "socialism", "social democracy", "capitalism", and so forth. I suppose you simply don't learn any of this at school. Moreover, the US party system gives you a choice between religiously radical center-right ("Democrats") and religiously fanatic far right ("Republicans"), and now in addition a bunch of genuine conspiracy theorists, Nazis, and racists (aka "alt right").

    8. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really sounds like you're talking about Democrats and Republicans, not right and left.

    9. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      "Free" healthcare is a system that is in trouble in just about every jurisdiction where it is in existence.

      50,000 Canadians a year travel to the U.S. to use our helathcare because they cannot get the equivalent treatment in Canada. 500,000 Australians travel to Asia for the same reason. Those that can afford it in Britain buy private insurance so they don't have to use NHS. Over a hundred thousand also go abroad for treatment rather than use NHS.

      As the topper if you want to look at what government healthcare would look like in the U.S. just look at the Veterans Administration, and ask yourself if that's the kind of healthcare you want.

    10. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my choices were between going to the VA and dying in my living room because I can't afford to see a doctor, I'd be THRILLED to suddenly have VA-level care available.

    11. Re: Thats Like Arresting Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but those numbers are not correct. As an Australian I can tell you that the reason people fly to Asia for operations is that they are generally not covered by Medicare in Australia, and in Asia they are a lower cost. These include cosmetic surgeries and some dental, and surgery to install stomach clamps. For major critical surgery they are done under Medicare and most patients would either have elective surgery or just simply obtain private healthcare, wait six months and have the surgery. No one is waiting to have critical surgery - the long waiting lists are for surgery's which are not critical - which most people just sign up to private healthcare for 6 months and drop once they complete it.

  11. Day in court by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He deserves his day in court, first in NZ, and (from all signs) in the US. He has not yet gone on trial for anything he is accused of doing, and has not been found guilty of anything. As both NZ and the US share similar laws regarding at least some of those things he has been accused of, it is not at all unusual that NZ will extradite Kim to face his accusers, at which time his actual guilt or innocence will be determined by a jury of his peers.

  12. Indonesia! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    No extradition with the US, phenomenal weather, low cost of living. A million will set you up for life in Bali, with no worries of ever being extradited to the US.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Indonesia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...phenomenal weather...

      Maybe up in the mountains. Everywhere else in Indonesia is brutally hot and humid.

    2. Re:Indonesia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indonesia is increasingly hostile to western ideals. Bali is about the only place in the country where there is some semblance of western "civilisation". Don't break the law there as a westerner. Don't get caught doing anything more than being drunk in public. Islam is cracking down there fairly quickly. Bali is much like Hong Kong was before Blighty turned it back over to the Chinese. This will not last forever. The laws in Bali and the tolerance of western excess are slowing. Many Aussies now no longer go there on holiday. They go to Vanuatu or Fiji or even the Philippines. Besides, the local Gold Coast is far prettier than Bali, and the government, while far from perfect, is not Islamic. Broome is another fantastic beach, as are the ones near Perth and even Adelaide.

    3. Re: Indonesia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indonesia is a backwards muslim shithole .

      Bali is even worse as although its majority Balinese it's still swarming with islamic scum and foreign drunk and broke sex pests.

      Avoid.

  13. Re:He should have borrowed from Snowden's playbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All his confiscated property was in NZ. Also, countries don't have to issue you an entrance visa if they suspect you are a fugitive (or will be considered one shortly). Especially if they're acting on a request from a powerful foreign state department.

    Plus you can't really just 'go' to a different country. They have to want you, and whatever problems you're bringing with you. The ones you can sneak into easily have terrible living conditions and infrastructure.

  14. Re:He should have borrowed from Snowden's playbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kim started at the height of the "streaming" boom, and made millions off other people's work being traded freely. Maybe he didn't understand the technology, or figured he could spin up the right partnerships & deals to legitimize the operation. Remember when he was courting pop-stars for promotional videos?

    Apparently he didn't realize Megaupload was just a web front-end to a Napster-like trove of copyrighted material.

  15. Re:He should have borrowed from Snowden's playbook by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Or maybe go to North Korea, his name would have granted him some privileges for sure.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  16. Re:He should have borrowed from Snowden's playbook by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    NZ, a western country that's a vassal of the USA

    Doens’t work like that. Some countries don’t extradite their own citizens like France and Germany, in this case he probably was safer in his own Germany. NZ: Kim is probably targetted by an international arrest warrant, and NZ just obeys international rules.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  17. Expat makes you easy to extradite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to be stateless or a citizen of another nation hostile to the US's extradition treaties to have a chance, and in those cases you are not permitted due process as a foreign national (I am not clear on if due process was normally afforded to foreigners in the past, but it definitely isn't today.)

    1. Re: Expat makes you easy to extradite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it mad that Russia - Russia of all places! - has become this sort of shining beacon of freedom? Wtf? How did we mess up this badly?

    2. Re: Expat makes you easy to extradite. by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Don't fool yourself. Russia is only providing shelter because it serves their purpose in tweaking the U.S. If it ever becomes advantageous for Putin to turn Snowden over to the U.S. it will happen so fast his head will spin. Assange is finding Ecuador, after a change in government leadership, is about done with him too.

      None of the countries mentioned are bastions of freedom. They are U.S. adversaries practicing realpolitik.

  18. Re:wow MEGAUPLOAD HIT ME IN MY NUTSACK PURSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My software was there. I complained to Paypal and it suspended megaupload's account. For a day. Then it was back. Mid-2000s.

  19. Re: He should have borrowed from Snowden's playboo by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1, Troll

    Kim made millions by making the world happier and more cultured. He (perhaps foolishly) didn't anticipate being dragged to an authoritarian country where he didn't live and didn't do business, for persecution and torture.

    When you start an online business, do you ask yourself if you're in compliance with the the laws of North Korea? What about Saudi Arabia? Venezuela?

    Even if you love copywrong and intellectual monopoly; even if you hate the idea of the masses having access to culture; even if you think Mr Dotcom is a flatulent shitlord - how can you support his extradition to a country he's never even visited? To a country like ours that's famed for the wickedness of its courts and the cruelty of its vast Gulag?

  20. Re:wow MEGAUPLOAD HIT ME IN MY NUTSACK PURSE by corydoras · · Score: 0

    Too bad for you that you chose such a fragile business model that this mattered.

  21. When extradition treaties apply by gbnewby · · Score: 4, Informative

    The key to extradition between countries is that the accusation needs to be for a crime for which an extradition treaty exists. Between the US and NZ, here is a listing (which is typical of other country treaties with the US): https://internationalextraditi... ... I did RTFA, but did not find a link to the NZ court ruling to confirm the extent to which this bilateral extradition treaty was the basis for the ruling.

    Dotcom is accused of racketeering and money laundering, which would seem to be covered in the treaty section on fraud: "16. Obtaining property, money or valuable securities by false pretenses or by conspiracy to defraud the public or any person by deceit or falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether such deceit or falsehood or any fraudulent means would or would not amount to a false pretense." The definition of racketeering is something like, "dishonest and fraudulent business dealings."

    International extradition treaties are part of why plaintiffs and prosecutors seek such high crimes, in their charges. The article links to the US court filing, if you want to see the full list. Another reason is that, in the US, criminal charges are made at the highest possible level of seriousness, so that there will be a plea bargain for a lower charge, rather than bringing a case all the way to the end. Federal prosecutions in the US very rarely result in Not Guilty or in charges being dismissed (under 5%).

    That EU law that got struck down yesterday was part of an industry effort to add copyright infringement to the set of laws that would let enforcement cross national boundaries. For copyright, there is no current international extradition (at least, not with the US -- the EU has been doing its own thing). The Berne Convention, and associated treaties under WIPO, are the applicable international treaties for copyright, and do not make provisions for extradition or international enforcement for copyright violation. The fact that international boundaries are usually very easy to cross via Internet traffic is a big concern for publishers, media companies, etc., and they have been trying for a long time to extend reach of copyright laws beyond national boundaries.

    One of the earliest such cases was in 2000, and involved a US copyright law forbidding reverse engineering of encryption. The DeCSS case, https://www.technewsworld.com/..., was to bring charges against Jon Johansen in Norway for posting a decryption program. Nowadays, I would expect charges in US courts would also include crimes for which extradition treaties apply, like fraud and larceny. This is easily achieved by stipulating large $ damages (due to lost revenue, piracy, etc.).

    More recently, we know that Julian Assange is concerned about being extradited to the US under a secret indictment in the US courts. The rape charges in Sweden were sufficient for extradition from the UK (https://www.government.se/government-of-sweden/ministry-of-justice/international-judicial-co-operation/extradition-for-criminal-offences/), but Ecuador has an approach that gives higher priority to avoiding torture than the bilateral treaties. The Guardian has a nice short cheeky piece about why Edward Snowden was also thought to be en route to Ecuador, before he ended up staying in Russia: https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

    We are getting the picture, right? The US isn't the only country that seeks very high-level crimes in what are basically copyright cases, nor are they the only country where moneyed business interests are able to get the ear of criminal courts for issues that are, essentially, civil cases (a distinction that matters a lot in countries that follow common law... less so for countries with different legal heritage, like Ge

    1. Re:When extradition treaties apply by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      Very informative, but you forgot one important detail. No extradition treaty mandates the extradition and countries sometimes decline otherwise valid extradition requests. For example, a Portuguese court declined in 2011 a valid extradition request for George Wright by the US for armed robbery and murder on the grounds that the person in question has built a new life, and the UK recently declined a valid extradition request by the US for Laurie Love's hacking of the Pentagon. Main concerns against these requests were human rights issues in the US justice and legal system. AFAIK, the US has also declined extradition requests for their citizens in the past, although I haven't found data on this.

      Personally, I believe that no country should currently extradite to the US because the US penal system has too many human rights issues and US sentences tend to be not adequate to the crime committed.

    2. Re:When extradition treaties apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extradition aside....

      Looking at the Federal Indictments on the DOJ page, the US Gov is taking a lot of liberality with their accusations against Dotcom and the MEGA employees.

      Presumably, actual 'legitimate business services' of which are 100% legal, when operated in parallel to accused criminal illegal business, then become 'illegal services'. I don't know if that is standard form in legal proceedings, but that is how I read the Indictment. That just doesn't seem... normal.

      Essentially, money generated by Advertising on MEGA, which is 100% legal, becomes 'illegal enterprise moneys' by 'association'? That is QUITE the legal wrangling to make that case..

      Cooking the books is one thing, so is that what the DOJ have?
      I'm curious how that's valid, considering beyond Domain Name registrars and hosting in the US, he was incorporated in Hong Kong, so how would that be valid for US jurisdiction? If DNS Reg and Hosting is what ultimately 'ties' him to the US, upon trial, hoping a good number of registrars take note.

      The legal leap on the provided legal services, from 'alleged' conspiracy IP theft, racketeering, conspiracy money laundering, and conspiracy to commit copyright infringement appears to fall under logical fallacy realm.

      I don't know if Dotcom will be able to make the case, but... this whole case, and the manner in which it was handled by the DOJ, and investigation, should be thrown out as a matter of 'fruit' of the poisoned tree. The 'strong-arming' acts by the US on the NZ Gov should be enough to get it thrown out.

      Hope Dotcom has some good lawyers.

    3. Re:When extradition treaties apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16. Obtaining property, money or valuable securities by false pretenses or by conspiracy to defraud the public or any person by deceit or falsehood or other fraudulent means,

      AT&T's prices are going up after the Time Warner merger in spite of their statements to the contrary. Racketeering charges when?

    4. Re:When extradition treaties apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you for the most part, however, those American citizens that are duly tried and sentenced for rape and murder get off way too easily anymore. I work in a prison town, and these people get 7 years for rape that's proven!? Rape and murder, if 100% provable, both deserve the death sentence IMHO. Ditto egregious identity theft and cracking that endangers life. Ditto armed assault.

  22. Re: wow MEGAUPLOAD HIT ME IN MY NUTSACK PURSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you theif.

  23. Re: wow MEGAUPLOAD HIT ME IN MY NUTSACK PURSE by WorBlux · · Score: 0

    Great argument, and brilliant commentary! *Sarcastic slow clap*

  24. Re: wow MEGAUPLOAD HIT ME IN MY NUTSACK PURSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, megaupload deleted your copies of the software you wrote? You some kind of idiot that can't remember what you coded so you couldn't re-write it?

    Or maybe you're just too dumb to know what "thief" actually means?

  25. Re:He should have borrowed from Snowden's playbook by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    They're a UK vassal. UK is merely friends with the US.

    I don't care what your opinions are, but will you please upgrade your basic knowledge so that you can do better analysis?

  26. Re: He should have borrowed from Snowden's playboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The asshole bribed local NZ politicians above and beyond the pay-for-citizenry scam. He doesn't deserve any of the legal protections of NZ. The guy is trying have his cake and eat it too. Fuck that guy.

  27. Beating a dead horse...or bloodly pulp by Kuruk · · Score: 0

    The US just want that pound of fat NZ meat. How many years has this trash been going on.

    My god Im so over it. Mega Torrents or Sharezilla.

  28. dare i ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obviously his arraignment in a US court on a crime that DOES NOT EXIST IN US LAW was totally dependent upon BHO's successor HRC, who by the way LOST!

    WOULD THE REAL Q
    please address this illegal illegality in law! otherwise known as a farce.

    if there is no law broken, how can he be charged? Pray tel, what statute?

    #QAnon

    1. Re:dare i ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i want to point out this as well ...

      Mega was googles only competion!

      follow the money! Who stands to profit in the control of what we can see?

      think chinese surveillance society with your info popping up in a little window as the mouse hovers type control.

  29. RoTfLmAo @ Antifa "NuKLeeR-ShuTdOwN"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Watch Antifa WEEZIL get his computer "rebooted" by good U.S. Patriot https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * Hahahahaha - A good dose of the "ole' 5 knuckle shuffle" sleeping potion!

    ( "WHAP!" )

    APK

    P.S.=> Hilarious/Priceless/CLASSIC - the traitor "not-man" pussy went DOWN like a SACK OF POTATOS in 1 punch - (-=*** "SPLAT" ***=-) lol... apk

  30. Kim Dotcom is a cow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are all cows. Cows say moo. MOOOOOOO! MOOOOOO! Moo cows MOOOOO! Moo say the cows. YOU MEGACAR-DRIVING COWS!!

  31. FALSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole MEGA* stuff was facilitating pirate content download.

    Having said that, 20 years in a US jail is too much for this.

    This guy was in conflict with police and the state when he left Germany and he is in NZ because he continued his scammer activities there.

    1. Re:FALSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC for reasons.

      There is tons of pirated content on every file hosting provider you could imagine.
      Github even has a little bit...

  32. Ahhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the *real* reason the Murricans want him in jail is sympathy for Russia ?

    Let us see the criminal evidence first.

  33. Sure, Angloboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your governments never do any wrong. Not since they extracted taxes out of new world settlers and denied them representation in their parliament.

    And of course all the chemical weapons showing up around the Porton Down facility are THE WORK OF TE EVIL PUUUTN !

    Plus, Saddam was somehow connected to 9/11 and he had a vial to poison the entirety of mankind.

  34. Look up GCSB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the NZ variant of NSA and they closely cooperate: "Hand us over the Fat Herr Schmitz, or no more sweet intercepts from China !"

    YES SIR ! We promise to send a SWAT team to go after the heinous, terroristic German !

  35. Booohoooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more rights for Mexicans to invade the USA ?

    I am all for it.

    Build the wall, like Hungary did to protect Europe !

  36. Boo hoo for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He facilitated and profited from piracy for years. He's now reaping what he sowed. His only hope now is there isn't an aircraft in existence big enough to haul his fat ass over the pacific.

  37. Game over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game over Kim Dotcom. Game over, man.

  38. Lets see ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... where our priorities are. Julian Assange publishes sensitive and classified State Department and Pentagon information. We're still waiting. Kim Dotcom, crosses the MPAA and Disney. Gotcha!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  39. Hong Kong Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those were the servers to Kim's follow-up company ... Mega.

    The original Megaupload servers were located in a co-location site in Northern Virginia, USA and were seized by the FBI. He won the return of them in 2017 but they had been trashed. See: https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/seized-assets-returned-to-kim-dotcom-by-us-government-in-rotten-state/news-story/3b7b8613f8996dd1148d8a7565fded2a

  40. Re: Canadians travelling for healthcare by YVRGeek · · Score: 1

    You sir, are very demonstrably ignorant of this issue. I'm so sick and tired of you right-wing American F**ks who do not understand the FIRST THING about universal health care. First, yes, Canadians travel to the US for healthcare but many Americans also come here because it's WAY, WAY cheaper to pay for world-class hospital care here if you need it and are not covered in the US (which is about 11% of the overall American population according to: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/1... ). BTW, in Canada, that number is 0%. Everyone is covered; well, unless you're an American coming up here trying to get healthcare 'cause you'll die in the US - then you'll have to pay for it... about 25% or so of typical US charges for many things. *WE* may travel to the US because it's FASTER to get certain types of procedures in the US - specifically elective and those for non-life threatening conditions - and pay an insane amount of money for it. Obviously, this means RICH Canadians. Having had three major surgeries here in Vancouver over the last four years, which were all performed by extremely qualified surgeons and support teams in a timely manner even though none of them were for life-threatening conditions in the short term. In the US, my insurer (if I was lucky enough to have one) would probably still be dicking me around on wether or not they'd cover it. I can also tell you that if I had been in the US, as an independent software developer, it's very unlikely I'd have any coverage at all except for perhaps under the ACA. So there. While I wish no ill on you just because you're a right-wing 'tard, part of me kinda hopes that you find yourself suddenly without HC and with no ability to pay for it - and needing it or you'll die. Then maybe you'll get it.

  41. Re: Canadians travelling for healthcare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Australians travelling to Asia are the lower socioeconomic housewives going to get cheap facelifts and boob jobs (that are commonly botched there and Australian doctors have to then fix them later).

    Fucking yeehaww Americans don't know shit.

  42. Re: Canadians travelling for healthcare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actual real figures not obtained from medical tourism tout sites put the number of Australians going to Asia for minor cosmetic procedures at about 15,000 per year, which the number of wealthy Asians travelling to Australia for their heart transplants or cancer treatments at 10,000 per year and growing.

    Australian healthcare is top notch. Asian healthcare is not.

  43. You don't define my cousins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look! It's a nosey fucking American poking his nosey nose into another country's business. You don't get to tell Pseudonym who are and aren't his cousins/friends/family. I have fresh off the boat Indians I'd stab your stupid ass to protect. You don't define us. Fuck right off!