Slashdot Mirror


China's Quantum Radar Could Detect Stealth Planes, Missiles (popsci.com)

hackingbear shares a report from Popular Science: China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC), China's foremost military electronics company, announced that its groundbreaking quantum radar has achieved capability of tracking high altitude objects, likely by increasing the coherence time entangled photons. CETC envisions that its quantum radar will be used in the stratosphere to track objects in "the upper atmosphere and beyond" (including space). Quantum can identify the position, radar cross section, speed, direction and even "observe" on the composition of the target such as differentiating between an actual nuclear warhead against inflatable decoys. [...] Importantly, attempts to spoof the quantum radar would be easily noticed since any attempt to alter or duplicate the entangled photons would be detected by the radar. The news is an important illustration of a larger trend of Chinese advancement in the new, crucial area of quantum research. Other notable projects in China's quantum technology include the Micius satellite, and advances by Alibaba and the Chinese University of Science and Technology in a world record of entangling 18 photons (a quantum supercomputer would require about 50 entangled photons), such that China arguably leads the world in quantum technologies.

19 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. We must stay competitive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We should implement Blockchain RADAR immediately as a response to this newfangled Quantum RADAR.

    1. Re:We must stay competitive! by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

      We should implement Blockchain RADAR immediately as a response to this newfangled Quantum RADAR.

      I know your idea sounds ridiculous on the surface, but if you use deep learning, you can put it in a div with Javascript. You couldn't before, but WebAssembly makes it possible. That's the advantage of Chinese hypertext.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:We must stay competitive! by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Meanwhile, congress and the stable genius in the Whitehouse are effectively reducing funding in the sciences and education. Pretty soon, the USA won't have enough people with the knowledge and skills to implement stuff like blockchain RADAR, let alone find out what stuff like Quantum RADAR is and how it works.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  2. Interferometry not quantum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They get two coherent photons, bounce one of a plane, receive it again and compare it to the original photon to see what's changed.

    Obviously it's not 'quantum entanglement' anything, because if it was, the BOUNCED PHOTON AND COMPARISON PHOTON WOULD ALSO CHANGE by fuzzy action at a distance.

    Sort of the exact opposite, since you need the original photon to not change to match the bounced photon. So if entanglement actually worked, this system wouldn't work.

    Sounds like Interferometry 101.

  3. Relevancy by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would China brag about this new advanced technology, telling the world that a "quantum radar" is indeed possible? To mislead westerners? If they really achieved such amazing military weaponry success, wouldn't they better keep silent? Or maybe China is simply aware of their superiority in quantum fields, which is more worrying..

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re: Relevancy by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly and this is precisely a Chinese cultural trait that will bite them in the ass.

      You never let your enemy know your position. The Americans have war toys out there that haven't seen the light of day. Some generals are super eager to use them on an enemy.

      Take the stealth fighters of the late 80s for example. They didn't come out out no of the wood work until an actual battle happened during Desert Storm.

      The Chinese are bluffing because of the trade war and trying to spread FUD. They're screwed and they know it.

      Irony: when your enemy is screwing up, dont correct him. Keep showing off your military tech while we keep ours locked up and super secret, itching to add another 100 years to their century of shame.

    2. Re:Relevancy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would China brag about this new advanced technology, telling the world that a "quantum radar" is indeed possible?

      China has no interest in an actual military confrontation. They want deference, so perception of strength is more important than reality, and bragging about new military tech makes sense.

    3. Re:Relevancy by Megol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any intelligent state have no interest in "military confrontation" (read: war).

    4. Re:Relevancy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why wouldn't they tell everyone? "Don't try to attack us, we have advanced defence systems that can detect your decoy missiles and track the real ones."

      Russia did the same with its announcement that it has hypersonic long range missiles and drone sub nukes that can't be stopped by any existing system. Both China and the US demonstrated their ability to shoot down satellites.

      And anyway, it's not like they could keep it a secret for very long. The US is presumably working on the same tech, and has a good idea of what the quantum radar test sites would look like on spy satellite photos.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re: Relevancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You never let your enemy know your position.

      Just tell them your velocity.

    6. Re:Relevancy by sinij · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reagan have done the same thing with Star Wars program. BS and infeasible plans to make USSR waste time on a dead-end research.

      This is just like that.

  4. Re: Well, that's great, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you suspect that? Detection at an extreme early phase (think pre-launch even) allows for an unprecedented strategic window for countermeasures.

    If what you're saying is, "who cares if they can detect is at unprecedented distances and time-frames, our JASSM's are unstoppable" you're repeating an oft-made military blunder. Never fall back on your last presumed advantage when all others have been obviously stripped away. It's likely you simply aren't aware that your last advantage has (also) already been eliminated.

    If they've cracked quantum detection, don't be so confident about simple kinetic countermeasures -- let alone asymmetric tactics.

  5. Smells like BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a researcher in the quantum communication area. Admittedly I can only judge by the poorly written Pop Science article, but the whole thing triggers my BS detector.

    "the coherence time entangled photons", "Quantum can identify..." - bad grammar is already a red flag.

    The whole "spoofing can be detected" sounds like someone made some confusion with QKD (quantum key distribution), a completely unrelated application of quantum technology.

    Finally, "a quantum supercomputer would require about 50 entangled photons"... Seriously, this is nonsense. I can't even.

  6. The whole thing is BS by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quantum entanglement has only been demonstrated in labs or down shielded cables with high frequency EM , ie light. Not with radio waves and not in the outdoor enviroment. It sounds like someone in the chinese Ministry of Propaganda has slung together a load of terminology picked at random from an undergrad physics book to try and impress. Plus as others have said, if it really worked it would be about as top secret as you can get.

  7. Re: Well, that's great, but by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Funny

    As opposed to the other classic military blunder: “Never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!”

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  8. Re: Well, that's great, but by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Funny

    (think pre-launch even)

    You mean by following the enemy president's twitter account?

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  9. Re:How can we believe them? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps we are playing "Two Lies, One Truth?"

    Perhaps... but, I'm not sure what they gain announcing these technologies- unless it's to set our researchers in a tizzy.

    If you really have technology to detect stealth planes on radar- why let the world know that- you've just lost your ace in the hole.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. Re:How can we believe them? by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Obviously it is more about claiming developments in quantum technology, than stealth aircraft. To detect stealth aircraft all you need is high accuracy weather radar. You do not look for the aircraft, you look for it's impact on the atmosphere, pressure wave, changes in water density in the atmosphere and the exhaust itself. For searching this is far superior, because it presents a much, much larger target, a huge target. You don't see the plane but you see a very suspicious polluted cloud moving at hundreds of kilometre an hour, with out any regard to wind patterns and presenting a shock wave. How big a target, I'll bet it would be the best way to do over the horizon radar, not targeting the plane at all, just it's impact on the atmosphere, likely making over the horizon far easier and extend it's range far, far beyond line of site.

    So in reality stealthy planes are only stealthy if they don't move or start their engines and of course any plane is stealthy if it hides in a hanger. So why is everyone still paying for brand new stealthy, cough, cough, aircraft, the lust for profit and corruption. It's not like they don't know this and have not been aware of it for years, but when there is a buck in it for the military industrial complex, expect lies and the truth to be buried.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  11. Re:How can we believe them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Detection does not equal an ability to target the aircraft. All stealth aircraft need to accomplish is to break some step in the "kill chain" between detection and a weapon arriving on target. Simply being detected without providing quality targeting information is not enough to obviate stealth aircraft. Also, your suggestion requires very precise information; likely weather radar cannot provide that resolution and detail. Even if it could, that's a massive amount of computing power required to monitor the entire border region of a target area 24/7/365 and twice on Sundays.

    And weather radars are large, stationary, and easy to destroy before sending in the aircraft. There are other radar arrays that can detect, but not target, stealth aircraft; they have the same faults. Stealth aircraft are designed to get closer to military radars than non-stealth equivalents. They are not invisible and it's always possible new detection technology will force changes in stealth technology. The point is not invisibility, the point is being able to penetrate enemy air defenses more reliably than previously possible.