Slashdot Mirror


Putin's Soccer Ball for Trump Had Transmitter Chip, Logo Indicates (bloomberg.com)

Russian President Vladimir Putin's gift of a soccer ball to U.S. President Donald Trump last week set off a chorus of warnings -- some of them only half in jest -- that the World Cup souvenir could be bugged. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham even tweeted, "I'd check the soccer ball for listening devices and never allow it in the White House." It turns out they weren't entirely wrong. From a report: Markings on the ball indicate that it contained a chip with a tiny antenna that transmits to nearby phones. But rather than a spy device, the chip is an advertised feature of the Adidas AG ball. Photographs from the news conference in Helsinki, where Putin handed the ball to Trump, show it bore a logo for a near-field communication tag. During manufacturing, the NFC chip is placed inside the ball under that logo, which resembles the icon for a WiFi signal, according to the Adidas website. The chip allows fans to access player videos, competitions and other content by bringing their mobile devices close to the ball. The feature is included in the 2018 FIFA World Cup match ball that's sold on the Adidas website for $165 (reduced to $83 in the past week).

241 comments

  1. Non story compared to how WH edited transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The WH has edited the official transcript AND edited the official video. So it's no mistake - https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/25/politics/trump-putin-transcript/index.html

  2. Head flappers gonna flap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slow news day, huh. Head flappers are going to flap their flappy little heads about something.

    1. Re:Head flappers gonna flap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slow news morning perhaps, it's been hoping since about 2 PM eastern. We have Pompao being grilled in the Senate and A joint US/EU presser on a new trade agreement concurrently.

  3. It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Left and Right, let's unite! Put aside our differences and work together for Make America Great Again. Let's do it! We can do it.

    Ebony and Ivory living in harmony? Awesome thoughts! Peace out.

  4. what a weird story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFS starts out as hinting that its going to be a "muh Russian hackers" anti-Trump story, but then morphs into an ad for an Adidas Soccer ball. Not that is going to stop the anti-Trump anon posts, though.

  5. He's just looking out for #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/25/politics/trump-putin-transcript/index.html - and then the coverup is evidence of cognizance of guilt, not to mention a crime to edit an official record for such purposes.

  6. You knew this was coming... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome are new Russian advertising overlords.

  7. Non-story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tons of consumer goods have RFIDs in them now and few people know. They are in shoes and belts and purses and higher end clothing items, and exist to track consumer patterns as they are scanned at various store entrances. This is not a conspiracy theory - it has been going on for a long time.
    This product is actually better in that it fully discloses some kind of end-user use for this, and it's not only about secret analytics (although it's certainly also used for company analytics).

  8. Re:Orange dipshit by ScentCone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hey, look! Another unhinged lefty doing everything he can to make sure that left's miserable losses over the last several years continue apace. Thanks!

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  9. Re: It will be great when Trump hangs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traitors?

    Mate, you wouldnâ(TM)t know a traitor if one walked up and introduced themselves as a traitor.

  10. #HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that we know Putin stole the election from Hillary Clinton it goes without saying that she must be given the Democratic nomination again in 2020. All potential challengers need to step aside. If it weren't for the Russian meddling she would've clearly won so she has to run again.

    1. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now that we know Putin stole the election from Hillary Clinton it goes without saying that she must be given the Democratic nomination again in 2020. All potential challengers need to step aside. If it weren't for the Russian meddling she would've clearly won so she has to run again.

      Sadly, I wouldn't put it past them - I think they really ARE that stupid.

      Most votes were not FOR Trump, but rather, AGAINST Hillary, and they refuse to believe that.

    2. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not sure why this is being modded as funny. She has to be the nominee again because of what The Russians! did to her. To deny her the 2020 nomination would refute the entire notion that the 2016 election was interfered with. Only one of Putin's trolls could be against this.

    3. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought we were talking about a soccer ball.

    4. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by kenh · · Score: 1

      Most votes were not FOR Trump, but rather, AGAINST Hillary, and they refuse to believe that.

      I know, it amazes me how many serious pundits talk about districts "Trump Won" in 2016, when in reality Trump didn't win them as much as Hillary lost them.

      For every person I know that voted FOR Trump, I know 3 that voted AGAINST Hillary.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No surprised that many of the 60,000,000+ voters that voted for trump are not showing it off, just look at what happens when someone wears MAGA hat or shows support for Trump in public.

      People are losing friends, family and jobs for supporting Trump.

      That explains your observations.

    6. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hell, let Canckles run in 2020.. PLEASE, pretty please with sugar on top...

      She'd be sure to lose a third time. Why? Trump would be the incumbent and she's seen as a looser. And being the incumbent in a national presidential election is about as close as you can get to a "sure thing" win. That and because her likeability numbers are NOT any better and she brings all the same baggage as before along with some clear concerns about her health and associations with the likes of Harvey Weinstein AFTER her election (and yes, there are pictures). Trump would get to claim 4 years of 'uge economic growth, new trade deals and negotiating peace with NK. So far he's not started any new wars either so that's a plus. The tax cuts where nice too and I'm guessing he's going to get the wall before too long. Barring any major unforced errors, he'd be a shoe in, despite all the crazy trumped up press coverage.

      Yep, The best way to have Trump until January 20, 2025 is to nominate Hillary again. So, as much as I'd hate listening to her cackles and stump speeches for 9 months, PLEASE do it...

      However, I do understand the dilemma... Who else do you have over there? Sanders? The bench is pretty much empty at this point and I don't see many options rising up from the morass of yet. Maybe because Trump is already in campaign mode and when anybody pokes their head up to see what way the wind is blowing Trump snipes them. I've been watching this happen over and over.

    7. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by kenh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not sure why this is being modded as funny.

      Because you can't be serious!

      HRC lost in 2008 to a first-term junior senator from Illinois with zero legislative accomplishments, she had no business running in 2016, and her subsequent health issues (she's taken to wearing a life-alert badge despite 24/7 security detail!).

      That said, I would love to see HRC run again in 2020 - that would be hysterical! I bet her first stops this time around would be Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania!

      --
      Ken
    8. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO You "know" nothing. You are told. So, you will do what you are told. Who cares who you think should run? You will vote for whomever you are told to vote for. 'Merica. It's as great as it gets. Least that's what the propaganda says.

    9. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by ichimunki · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Most votes were not FOR Trump, but rather, AGAINST Hillary, and they refuse to believe that.

      Actually... most votes were for Hillary. She won the popular vote by some 3 million votes. Problem for her was: they were in the wrong states. But who's stupid, again?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    10. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by msauve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Actually... most votes were for Hillary. She won the popular vote by some 3 million votes."

      Actually, Hillary and Trump tied, with exactly zero votes each. All votes in a presidential election are for electors.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Trump won 304-227.

    12. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 0

      Anyone trying to steal the 2020 nomination from Hillary is kompromat. Period.

    13. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should lose their heads.

    14. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by guruevi · · Score: 1

      People are getting ASSAULTED for supporting Trump before and after the election. If you thought voter intimidation only happened in Nazi Germany, welcome the third wave of neo-Marxists.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    15. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by msauve · · Score: 1

      That's the electoral vote, not the popular vote, which is what the GP was talking about.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    16. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most votes were not FOR Trump, but rather, AGAINST Hillary, and they refuse to believe that.

      I know, it amazes me how many serious pundits talk about districts "Trump Won" in 2016, when in reality Trump didn't win them as much as Hillary lost them.

      For every person I know that voted FOR Trump, I know 3 that voted AGAINST Hillary.

      I voted for Bernie in the primary and Hillary in the general. She has the skills to do the job, and the scandals were overblown. You just knew a lot more about her than Trump which gave an incorrect impression to many. Let's face it, the right has been working nearly full time to destroy her for what a generation?

      That being said, while I'd love to see a woman president, and if by some chance she gets the nomination again, I will vote for her, I'd still greatly prefer we get someone new. How about someone with solid lifelong solid principles like Bernie, but maybe a few years younger, and the skills to explain why those convictions are good and why Trump's insane ramblings about MAGA, Trade Wars, and such are not solid or reasonable policies?

      I'm still not seeing a front runner emerge though, and that is scary. Of course if one did emerge the right would spend from now until the election destroying their credibility by any means possible. Ethics be dammed. The problem is such efforts do, over time, work. Obama was able to emerge partly because they prepared to fight Hillary and suddenly there he is winning the primary.

      One of the things that benefited Trump as much as anything is he was always on the TV. We need someone who has at least has at least a similar level of energy. Of course if the nominee is a woman, then unfortunately she needs to avoid being shrill to avoid stereotypes, which is sad, but you know Trump will have an insulting and demeaning nickname waiting, and trying to play down to his level seldom works.

    17. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one of Putin's trolls could be against this.

      Does anyone really know what troll means or is anymore?

      Maybe it is internet itself that is becoming most funny?

    18. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the popular vote doesn't count when it comes to actually winning the Presidency. The Democrats were too fucking stupid to realise that crucial point.

    19. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by gordguide · · Score: 1

      No surprised that many of the 60,000,000+ voters that voted for trump are not showing it off, just look at what happens when someone wears MAGA hat or shows support for Trump in public.

      People are losing friends, family and jobs for supporting Trump.

      That explains your observations.

      Posting as AC for obvious reasons.

      After the first Obama election, for the first time in nearly 30 years, and something I was until then positive I would never hear, multiple clients of mine, all US citizens, opined that someone should shoot him. The nature of my business was rather remote outdoor recreation, I spent upwards of 50 hours with a client, and aside from the usual common-sense reluctance to discuss religion or politics, sometimes clients would bring it up. The adventures are expensive and virtually all the clients were Republicans, which should surprise no-one. But it was a shock the first time I heard it and a surprise how many times afterward I heard it. So, it's not just Trump that generates strong emotional responses.

    20. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by gordguide · · Score: 1

      " ... Posting as AC for obvious reasons. ..."

      Oops. I KNOW I checked that box. Oh well.

    21. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clinton - Gore in 2000!

    22. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That this is being cited as evidence against Trump's supporters should be taken as nothing else but proof of psychiatric and/or neurological malfunction.

      Bad people go around committing assaults against people they don't like. Full stop.

    23. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by KeensMustard · · Score: 1
      Lot's of people lost in the election, including the GOP. They can't all be made whole by electing Hillary.

      The fastest path back to the rule of law would be for the GOP to either support impeachment, or failing that, to not nominate Trump as their candidate. They had serious doubts before, and those doubts have been confirmed several times over by now, not the least by Trump's traitorous blaming of Russian aggression on the United States.

      Trump needs to to go to jail for the prestige and reputation of the country to be restored and there seems to be no reason to delay.

    24. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are losing friends, family and jobs for supporting Trump.

      And health insurance and life.

      Well, not for supporting Trump specifically, but as a consequence of it.

      Elections have consequences, who knew right?

    25. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by guyniraxn · · Score: 1

      You dumb fucking monkeys mod up a comment that's a deliberately diversion. We're talking about the popular vote, millions of people whose opinions should matter more than non-bound representatives. You're all for small government until it benefits you, then a fucked up system is just dandy and the only thing that matters.

    26. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an icepack for youR BUTT.

    27. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Which makes it look like a bigger victory than it was because those states give all their votes to one candidate, instead of proportionally based on the number of citizen votes each received.

      The fact is that most people didn't want Trump. The system handed him the win, a win by technicality. That's why he is so touchy about it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People said those things all the time about W. People were publicly burning and hanging effigies of him, talking about assassinating him, etc. They were the ones who bullied and intimidated and spit on our broken sons we'd sent to Vietnam. The left were never the peaceful tolerant reasonable ones they claim to be. Or claimed I should say -- I think they've well and truly given up all hope of continuing to try fooling people after the past 2 years.

      Not that conservatives are angels, mind you.

    29. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumb fucking monkeys mod up a comment that's a deliberately diversion. We're talking about the popular vote

      Other way around. Bringing up popular vote is the original deliberate diversion. People pointing out the electoral vote is a correction to the diversion.

      The American system doesn't decide the POTUS by popular vote. Bringing the popular vote up is like talking about how your team's horse/car had more people betting on it. So what? The race doesn't care about that when determining the winner. The ensemble dark (or rather orange) horse won. It happens.

      Even if we speak in general ideals on democracy, democracy doesn't mean a tyranny of the majority. Democracy means rule by the people, and "the people" includes both the majority AND the minority. Most democratic societies go with a republican system (like the US) instead of direct democracy because they want to balance the wishes of the majority with not trampling over and alienating minorities.

      The result of 2016 tell us that various minority groups did feel trampled enough that they would band together and send representatives to vote for the guy who made big promises to speak for those minorities. (and don't even try to bring up how those minority groups must be racist/sexist/whatever, that's another distraction... racist/sexist or not, they are still citizens with the vote)

    30. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      Here's a map showing vote breakdown by county: https://commons.wikimedia.org/...

      It's overwhelming.

    31. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Hmm, it's as if you don't understand how the population isn't evenly distributed.

      Wait, I remember you arguing that the uneven vote weighting was right and proper, to protect rural communities from the urban majority...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      I understand that very well, as did the Founders of the country. That's the wisdom of the Electoral College. Without it a handful of high-density population centers would run roughshod over the other 90% of the country. A presidential candidate would only have to campaign in 3 states at the expense of the other 47 if the election were to be decided by popular vote.

    33. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is no "popular vote", there is only one that counts, and its electoral.

    34. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by msauve · · Score: 1

      "The fact is that most people didn't want Trump. "

      That's true. It's also true that most people didn't vote for Clinton ("didn't want Clinton", in your parlance). No candidate's electors received a majority of the popular vote.

      And, the win wasn't in any way a "technicality," it worked exactly as the Constitution intended. There was never any plan for a popular vote for president - in fact, it's entirely up to the states to determine how electors are chosen. If a state wants to have their legislature or governor chose the electors, or even draw names from a hat instead of having a popular vote, they can. And the weighting of each state's influence is deliberately different than their population, for the same reasons that all states are given equal influence in the Senate.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    35. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Yep, what the majority of voters want doesn't matter...

      Yeah, I know the electoral vote is there for a reason and I'm not sure it should be repealed, something just "feels" weird about it. I'm sure its just me.

    36. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      According to President Trump "The electoral college is a disaster for democracy". https://twitter.com/realdonald...

      I guess even a lying clock tells the truth by accident once in a while.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    37. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I use the Chess example all the time. Arguing for popular vote is like arguing that the person with the most pieces on the board should win a game of chess. That's not how the game is played. And people who keep arguing about it don't know anything useful on the topic. It is just sour grapes.

      I'd say "checkmate", but the idiots will keep arguing about a game nobody was playing.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    38. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      You're right, The opinions of a few Californians, New Yorkers and a few other states should decide who the president of the US should be. Fuck everyone else. I live in California, and it is bad enough that stupid leftists are running this state into the ground, only caring for illegal aliens, criminals stupid liberal projects (HSR) and the "oppressed", while normal every day people of all colors and stripes are ignored.

      And it shows, from the shithole San Francisco has become to failing infrastructure of nearly collapsing dams, to the people fleeing the state in record numbers.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    39. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by FlamingGuts · · Score: 1

      Look at the amount of bombs and missiles Trump is launching, and has no intention of dialing back the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Hillary Clinton would ramp that up even further. They're both war hawks. Where the fuck is the anti war left? Why are you supporting a warlord? Look at what she did as secretary of state. She has the blood of millions of innocent people on her hands, and you want to give ANOTHER democrat or republican power?

    40. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Why? What is so terrible about him? He's racist - ok, show me. You made the claim, prove it. I know you can't because it's BS. I challenge people to show me that all the time, no one can. Right along with everything else they threw up and didn't stick. We know the Dems lie, Harry Reid said so with Romney about his taxes. Bold faced lie.

      You're just like one of Hitler's brown shirts. Well intentioned, no brain.

    41. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      You're short. Trump won with 306. It's not his fault a couple people didn't vote in the college the way they pledged they would. Clinton had 232, 5 people didn't vote for her that were supposed to.
      Did Hillary blame you? Just let her know if she somehow missed you so she can come back and blame you too. Imagine if that despot made it.

    42. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by MrPater · · Score: 1

      Huh? Chess pieces aren't trying to elect a government. Chess pieces aren't trying to have a say in the way their country is run. Chess pieces are for use in a game with a structured set of rules.

      While what you said sounds clever it's a gross over-simplification.

      Lots of other countries have systems that allow the popular vote to have a large impact but acknowledge that living in certain high-density population centers can blind you to issues that other areas might be having that need to be addressed. They deal with this buy having a certain number of seats in government dedicated to representatives elected for specific areas so even if they don't get the people in power that they would like they can still get their voice in the room.

      Having the majority of peoples preference ignored just because they live in a city is crazy. It's like deciding on your government by acres rather then people.

      --
      Crap, I have a levitation class at 25:131. Better set the alarm to 'cinnamon'.
    43. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by MrPater · · Score: 1

      Lots of other countries have systems that allow the popular vote to have a large impact but acknowledge that living in certain high-density population centers can blind you to issues that other areas might be having that need to be addressed. They deal with this buy having a certain number of seats in government dedicated to representatives elected for specific areas so even if they don't get the people in power that they would like they can still get their voice in the room.

      Having the majority of peoples preference ignored just because they live in a city is crazy. It's like deciding on your government by acres rather then people.

      Wrangell-St. Elias for President 2020!

      --
      Crap, I have a levitation class at 25:131. Better set the alarm to 'cinnamon'.
    44. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by MrPater · · Score: 1

      In his 1991 book Trumped! John O'Donnell quoted Trump as saying:

              I've got black accountants at Trump Castle and at Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys wearing yarmulkes.... Those are the only kind of people I want counting my money. Nobody else... Besides that, I tell you something else. I think that's guy's lazy. And it's probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks.

      In an interview in 1997, he admitted that the information in the book was "probably true". Two years later, when seeking the nomination of the Reform Party for president, he denied having made the statement.

      In August 2016 Trump campaigned in Maine, which has a large immigrant Somali population. At a rally he said, "We've just seen many, many crimes getting worse all the time, and as Maine knows — a major destination for Somali refugees — right, am I right?" Trump also alluded to risks of terrorism, referring to an incident in June 2016 when three young Somali men were found guilty of planning to join the Islamic State in Syria.

      In Lewiston, home to the largest population of Maine Somalis, the police chief said Somalis have integrated into the city and they have not caused an increase in crime; crime is actually going down, not up. The mayor said Lewiston is safe and they all get along. At a Somali support rally following Trump's comments the Portland mayor welcomed the city's Somali residents, saying, "We need you here." Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins commented, "Mr. Trump's statements disparaging immigrants who have come to this country legally are particularly unhelpful. Maine has benefited from people from Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and, increasingly, Africa — including our friends from Somalia."

      "Sadly, the overwhelming amount of violent crime in our major cities is committed by blacks and hispanics-a tough subject-must be discussed."

      https://twitter.com/realDonald...

      From his 2015 announcement speech:

      "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best,” he said. “They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I will admit that a lot of the stuff on this page is people just running their mouths but there is plenty of pretty solid stuff on their that indicate racism.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      While he's may not be overtly racist I think he's very good a turning a blind eye to racism and allowing it to happen.

      Really though I think he just plays a game where he takes no clear stance on anything and just says what feels right in the moment. The difficulty confirming any stance results in a high level of discourse and people just go with whatever they happen to glean from really poor media coverage.

      --
      Crap, I have a levitation class at 25:131. Better set the alarm to 'cinnamon'.
    45. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      Another amazing thing about the US Constitution that shows the brilliance of the Founders is that it contains within it is the very means by which it can be amended. If there is so much support for a new method for electing the President then you should get right on that. I suspect you won't though.

    46. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You have no clue how the electoral college works. It should be repealed for obvious reasons that anyone with a logical brain can reason.

    47. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not overwhelming. The counties that voted for Trump represent roughly 1/15th of the American population. Mathematically it can never add up, but math is just a liberal conspiracy, right?

    48. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because a few Californians and New Yorkers basically drive all of American society forward, while red states would literally starve to death if it weren't for welfare from productive states. The irony of seeing someone from California complaining about the state that literally makes America possible is amusing.

    49. Re:#HerTurnAgain2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say you are easily offended and probably need to work on your English language skills. The obvious meaning of the sentence you quoted is that "of the Trump votes, most of them were not FOR Trump, but against Hillary".

      It would not make sense any other way, and with your "correction" it would make sense even less.

    50. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Might want to check this out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      In fact, Democrats often talked positively about Trump until he was a candidate for the Republicans. Black rap songs aspiring for him. A lot of black people are seeing the hypocrisy.

      How do I break this to you. What you're telling me is you don't know what racism is. It's really offensive how people use it to describe someone simply because they don't agree with them. Usually over something very minor.

      You complain about him pointing out black people get in trouble with the law, then bring in Hispanics which is an ethnicity and not a race. They're really just white guys for the most part. You can be black an Hispanic as well. The Census Bureau has a table on that and that's what was agreed to decades ago. Not subjective. As for the criminal problem - just look at the numbers. Black groups point it out. Trump had problems with people that happened to turn out to be black counting money. I'm sure there have been Jews that steal (Bernie Madhoff comes to mind), however I've worked with plenty of Jews and I've never had one steal a dime from me. I have plenty of black men & women steal from me doing business. OMG have they stolen from me if they get half a chance. That's fact, not racism. How much? I'd say well over 100K over the past 30 years. Well over 100K.

      So I don't do business with black people anymore? Nope, in fact I own a bunch of houses and every one of them has a black family in it. In fact I recently helped get a black man out of jail. He was in for a violent related crime. I don't think he did it, which is why I helped him get out.

      Sure you want to go into the immigrants? Especially the muslim bit. They have a history and they'll tell you that's how they take over countries. Come in, they don't assimilate, they take over. That's what they're doing in Europe with their enclaves and that's what they're doing here. Not that far from me in Virginia there's an enclave that I can't go to. Even though it's supposedly a public area. Little by little they take over areas, governments, put in Sharia law and then it's theirs. Resist and they kill you. In France there are a lot of no go zones. This is something Europeans fought for centuries to keep out and now they're welcoming them and even paying them to come. The stupidity of the young.

      So let's talk about the Mexicans. Do you watch the fake news or the real news that'll tell you about how they have done DNA tests on these kids and can prove they are NOT related to the adults that brought them in? Child trafficking, sex slavery. They will claim they are their kids right up until the DNA test proves they aren't. Plenty of MS13, which is a big problem in PG County, right next to Washington DC. They murder a lot of people. In fact you have to murder someone to become a member. So why isn't it ok to talk about this? Sure there are people not like that, however there are a lot that are. We have laws about this. Why isn't it ok to enforce these laws? Why penalize the people that came in legally? Why are so many people duped by this.

      I know about racism. I grew up with it. There was a city about 5 miles from mine that had a guard shack to prevent entry, Jews, Blacks were not welcome nor allowed in. I think the shack was removed in 1972. Black people couldn't buy in most neighbourhoods, only certain areas. Go south a little bit and they had separate bathrooms, separate water fountains for black people. As if they had a disease or something. Black people had a guide for how to travel. It was called the Green book. A black man could end up dead without it. No kidding. Black people couldn't get certain jobs. Can you imagine that? It's charging black people more to barrow money than the same situation white person. It's not showing a black man the same houses as the white woman. Same financials, she's white, he's black, shown different neighbourhoods. That's what racism is like. So who passed these laws, usually refe

    51. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by MrPater · · Score: 1

      What you're telling me is you don't know what racism is.

      It's racist to imply that anything relating to skin color or heritage has anything to do with someones tendency to behave a certain way. Race and heritage have nothing to do with the culture or social situation someone was raised in and has no direct bearing on a persons behavior.

      You complain about him pointing out black people get in trouble with the law, then bring in Hispanics which is an ethnicity and not a race.

      1. I didn't bring in Hispanics, he did. It's a quote from him.
      2. "According to a United Nations convention on racial discrimination, there is no distinction between the terms "racial" and "ethnic" discrimination." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The fact that someone is "Black" on its own has nothing to do with their tendency to commit crime. The fact that someone is Hispanic on its own has nothing to do with their tendency to commit crime. What drives someone to crime is their social environment, usually relating to lower socioeconomic status status.

      Saying that people of a lower socioeconomic status commit the most crime is not racist. Saying that "Blacks and Hispanics" commit the most crime is racist.

      Saying that is like saying "People with brown hair commit the most crime". While that may or may not be objectively true, having brown hair alone does not mean you have a higher likelihood of getting into crime. Perhaps people with brown hair are treated differently and THAT leads them to be more likely to commit a crime but the hair alone is not the cause and shouldn't be the focus.

      Focusing on physical attributes and heritage that CANNOT BE CHANGED helps no one. Focus on what can be changed.

      As for the criminal problem - just look at the numbers. Black groups point it out.

      Yes, but so what. Black skin still has nothing to do with it. The only factor that matters is how people perceive them and treat them including how they perceive and treat themselves. Stop talking about "Black People committing crime" and just talk about "People committing crime". Black has nothing to do with it.

      Trump had problems with people that happened to turn out to be black counting money. I'm sure there have been Jews that steal (Bernie Madhoff comes to mind), however I've worked with plenty of Jews and I've never had one steal a dime from me. I have plenty of black men & women steal from me doing business.

      Again, the point is that someone's religious background or skin color has nothing to do with their tendency to steal. Also you're not looking at the end of that quote from him. "And it's probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks"

      Being Black has nothing to do with that and saying that ANYTHING is a trait of someone who is Black other then having Black skin is racist.

      I don't really see how your personal actions have any bearing here. We're talking about Trump. I don't know you and as far as I'm aware you're not a public servant/"leader of the free world" who says damaging things in massive public forums. I'm sure you behave in a way that you believe shows respect to your fellow man and that's all we can do at the end of the day.

      Sure you want to go into the immigrants? Especially the muslim bit. They have a history and they'll tell you that's how they take over countries. Come in, they don't assimilate, they take over. That's what they're doing in Europe with their enclaves and that's what they're doing here. Not that far from me in Virginia there's an enclave that I can't go to. Even though it's supposedly a public area. Little by little they take over areas, governments, put in Sharia law and then it's theirs. Resist and they kill you. In France there are a

      --
      Crap, I have a levitation class at 25:131. Better set the alarm to 'cinnamon'.
    52. Re: #HerTurnAgain2020 by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      So I get back to what I originally said - you don't know what racism is. You probably never will. Don't get upset, a lot of people don't see it. Sort of like me saying I can get way high up and I'm in my airplane at 15,000' and you're saying you're high up and you're on a hill about 200' up. Sure, you're high. It's really hard for me to describe what being 15,000' up is to you to the point you'll understand it. You haven't lived it, you simply don't know it.

      You still don't know that saying something against Mexicans isn't racist because that's an ethnicity. You don't know that difference. It's just a dog whistle because the Dems want to allow them in unregulated and they think that'll work. They couldn't care less about the Mexicans or black people for that matter.

      So Lewistown? Look here - https://apnews.com/7f2b534b806... . So they very people being used to say Trump is racist embrace him. Blacks are doing better now than they have under any Democrat President. Record low unemployment, etc, etc, etc.

  11. Why the outrage? by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Informative

    The summary says:

    the chip is an advertised feature of the Adidas AG ball

    Are we going to now say that Russia hacked Adidas, put a "spy! device on it (NFC of all things) for the sheer purpose of listening in on Trump?

    The Trump Derangement Syndrome has reached new epic proportions.

    1. Re:Why the outrage? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2, Informative

      Putin doesn't need a listening device to know he has Trump by the ball.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Russians can manipulate millions of voters, it's not at all far fetched that they could foresee the need for modified RFID chips in soccer balls.

      Those Russians are crafty. So very, very crafty. They epitomize craftiness, and they do it craftily.

    3. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What outrage? Seriously who are these people who are outraged about this?

    4. Re:Why the outrage? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Adidas are Russian collaborators. Obviously.

    5. Re: Why the outrage? by kenh · · Score: 1

      How exactly would an RFID hip in the ball gater intelligence without a microphone or other sensor? How would it transfer it's information without a conventional transmitter (an RF-powered NFC chip would require a reader located within 3 feet of ball, best case. Oh, and the lack of a power source would also limit it's range.

      But yeah, it's totally a surveillance device. /SMH

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more outraged that they're charging $165 for a bag of air.

    7. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, installing a listening device in a ball that has one installed already by the manufacturer makes a kind of 'hiding in plain sight' sense. Both the USSR and US did way stupider things in the cold war to sneak listening devices into important places.

      Though, from the sound of it the ball in question doesn't come with a listening device, juts an ID tag, and the article is more some bored attention-whore with acess google found something moderately funny.

    8. Re: Why the outrage? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      If you have a background in electronics, you would know that it's relatively easy to detect a different kind of device. The White House has hundreds of visitors every month, dropping a tiny robot in a ceiling tile or one of those plug routers with some passive recording equipment would be much more effective and could be near undetectable. Still I think they would have detectors/sweeps for any rogue active broadcasts within the WH.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanted to bug someone and have the resources, this would be a perfect cover. literally repurposing the device or better yet build a replica with your own device. Joke that it's bugged etc...

      Certain agencies exist to run scenarios like this. The spy field is full of stories of this type, hell hackers have been dropping USB sticks outside corp offices expecting someone to pick one up and plug it in. The weakest link in your security protocol will always be people.

      So no...no TDS necessary.

    10. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What outrage? People were cracking jokes. Now treason, that's something to be outraged about...

    11. Re:Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't need to hack Adidas.

      They just got 'not yet finished'' Adidas ball, from the assembly line, and put their own bug in it.

      Might want to look at where those soccer balls are made. Sure as hell isn't America...

    12. Re: Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have replaced the chip with anything, spies always have cover stories to explain every single little thing they do. The CIA used to do stuff like this all the time, maybe they still do, but it seems nowdays they're more interested in spying on everyone constantly.

    13. Re: Why the outrage? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Russia did a active transmitter with no internal power device in 1945 also disguised as a gift. So it is possible.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    14. Re: Why the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly would an RFID hip in the ball gater intelligence without a microphone or other sensor?

      Why would anyone think that it doesn't have a microphone or other sensors?
      It's not like Trump is going to hand the ball over to the intelligence agencies.
      Even if they grabbed it from him, cut it open and found a microphone Trump would only scream about fake news.
      There is absolutely no risk at all involved for trying. Putin can just keep showering Trump with bugs.

      Do you remember that time when Trump let Russian spies be in the oval office on their own? How many listen devices do you think they installed?
      The next POTUS will have to burn the white house down and rebuild it.

    15. Re:Why the outrage? by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      can manipulate millions of voters

      [Citation Needed]

      Seriously thou, we know that they promoted Trump, but we know they also promoted Bernie Sanders and loads of other divisive far right and far left politics outside of the political mainstream. The goal was not to get Trump elected, the purpose was to sow chaos and division which going on about how Trump should be impeached because of this doesn't exactly help with. Had Bernie gotten the democratic nomination and won the election, which isn't that unlikely seeing how Hillary was literally the worst candidate to put up against Trump in an anti-establishment themed election like 2016, we'd be talking about the exact same thing with him.

      Outside of the anti-establishment vs embodiment-of-the-established candidate in an anti-establishment themed election if you actually look at how Hillary and Trump ran their campaigns you can clearly see that they both ran very different campaigns and that just in itself provides a good explanation as to how an un-electable candidate like Trump could win the election. Trump ran, or rather had his campaign run, in a way that was very cognizant of how the election system in the U.S works, polling data on what states can actually swing either way and used this to not only inform his policy promises, it most importantly informed where he would hold his campaign rallies. Hillary on the other hand not only completely failed to understand the prevailing anti-establishment winds, she also focused on touring places where she overwhelming support, which is what you're not supposed to do, and as a result ignored multiple swing states that ended up swinging the other way.

      The best demonstration of how incompetently Hillary's campaign was run is how she succeeded in loosing both Pennsylvania and Michigan, neither of which has voted republican since Reagan along with Wisconsin, whose blue streak goes even further.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
  12. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you become a failed billionaire? I would love to become a failed billionaire.

  13. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Ivan, here is your 50 kopek, you've added to the misinformation campaign, now fek off.You idiots still waiting on evidence don't know how investigations work, you don't disclosed the damming evidence until you are sure to have a slam dunk case. All these little indictments so far are paving the way for the main attraction.

  14. Hiding in Plain Sight by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a great place to hide something in plain sight.

    A soccer ball with a transmitter that isn't supposed to have one would stand out. However, a soccer ball that has a *different* transmitter than it came with would be much harder to identify.

    1. Re:Hiding in Plain Sight by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great place to hide something in plain sight.

      A soccer ball with a transmitter that isn't supposed to have one would stand out. However, a soccer ball that has a *different* transmitter than it came with would be much harder to identify.

      Good thought!

  15. Obviously a link to the C&C for Trump by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Obviously that NFC chip will link Trump to the C&C server Putin has set up to give Trump orders as to what he should work on sabotaging next. Russian cyberoperatives have clearly demonstrated their proficiency in hacking into any system they want, so hacking into whatever media server that chip links to should be trivial for them. Orders and other relevant data embedded in media files (a common steganography technique) can then be easily retrieved and decoded by Trump and no one would be the wiser.

    Haha, I'm just kidding.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    ...or am I?

    1. Re:Obviously a link to the C&C for Trump by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Obviously a link to the C&C for Trump by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put it past you. TDS is a serious condition that one should seek immediate professional medical help.

    3. Re:Obviously a link to the C&C for Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugger off

    4. Re:Obviously a link to the C&C for Trump by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      C&C Server?

      Ooh, I hope it plays Red Alert 2!

  16. Politics aside, this is a lame gimmick by kingbilly · · Score: 1

    "The chip allows fans to access player videos, competitions and other content by bringing their mobile devices close to the ball."

    Or you could just browse the web to get the same content? I suppose there is always the possibility for exclusive content locked behind some obscure URL that is unique to whatever is stored on the chip, but really? I find this stuff interesting from a technical perspective but cringe-worthy if actually marketed and desired.

  17. FUCK THE FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And their constant election meddling.

    1. Re:FUCK THE FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Trump WH... FBI FUCKS YOU!

        Oh, how the swamp drains itself sometimes lol.

  18. Re:It will be great when Trump hangs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upholding the highest laws - what laws has Trump broken and convicted of?

  19. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And replace them with your fucking traitors and asshats? Nope. We had eight years of nothing but amateur hour with Obama and we are not electing some dressed up socialist asshole. I would rather have Donald Dingdong than some left wing twerp. Yeah your side is just that bad.

  20. Nostalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember when the biggest foreign relations scandal involving a president was giving a bust of Churchill back to England?

    Good times.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't.
      https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    2. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also remember some ambassadors literally dieing ......... but im sure u can show us where trump abandoned a US consulate so his dirty deeds wouldn't be aired right?

    3. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sold, not gave. And it never got there. Shipment was intercepted, repackaged and sold to Alex Jones who now markets it as over-priced protein powder. Good stuff.

    4. Re:Nostalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      But I do remember when a certain tan-suited "president" decided to go on an apology tour and apologize to every nation he could about America being a land of opportunity.

      Yeah, except there were no "apologies". The whole "Obama apology tour" thing was completely made up.

      https://www.factcheck.org/2012...

      https://www.politifact.com/tru...

      https://www.cnn.com/2012/10/23...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love Snopes.

      The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony “indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow,” although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal.

      "We now know that the Clinton Foundation received money from Russia specifically for the purpose of influencing Hillary Clinton's decisions as Secretary of State, but there may not have been an official quid pro quo agreement, so we rank this false."

    6. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Oh but this is Hannity so these quote aren't real

    7. Re:Nostalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Oh but this is Hannity so these quote aren't real

      Barack Obama didn't apologize in any of those clips Hannity showed. In fact, he says, "I will never apologize for promoting the best interest of the United States."

      Only on Fox was that considered an apology.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In italics I put the bit of the speech that your clip showed. In bold I put the bit after the cut. You are a liar sir.

      Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive. But in Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans choose to blame America for much of what's bad.

      It's not as if everyone with intelligence can't just see the very sudden cut and work out that immediately following is something that Hannity wants to pretend didn't get said.

      Oh but this is Hannity so these quote aren't real

      The thing is that I am almost 100% sure that you know that these quotes are fake, taken out of context. Deliberately lying by making something seem like what it isn't. What do you get out of this? Why bother? Is this really a good use of your life? Do you really believe your allies are that stupid? At some point your life is so useless and empty that you would be better, perhaps not killing yourself, but just walking off in a random direction and keeping going until you find something better or die in the attempt.

    9. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that... Hannity's quote is, in fact, accurate, and Obama did, in fact, go on an apology tour. Because even in the full quote, Obama is still apologizing for America being great.

      Which we all already knew. But thank you for providing additional evidence, I guess.

    10. Re:Nostalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you're saying is that... Hannity's quote is, in fact, accurate

      Now wait. You said that Obama "went on an apology tour" and then the proof you offered was a quote, not from Obama, but from Hannity?

      I'm confused. I'm not willing to accept that you're that stupid, since you managed to hit both a PREVIEW button and a SUBMIT button. So are you just dishonest? Is that what this is?

      Let me leave you with this quote from the President of the United States of America. Not a made-up quote, but an actual quote:

      'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening'

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hannity's quote of the president is accurate. Do I have to spell everything out for you, popeflake?

      And I know that the media routinely distorts and lies. That's not new. Like pretending Obama didn't go on an apology tour, apologizing for America being the greatest country in the world. Guess what? No matter how much you want to pretend it didn't happen: it did! There's video proof!

    12. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fancy seeing you here again.

    13. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost as if "fact-checkers" are actually activists with bylines, like 90% of all the rest of the 'journalists'. Ignoring or manipulating context, changing the question to which they provide an answer, alternately becoming super-literal and technical or ignoring literal and technical accuracy in favor of 'greater meaning' - even just choosing which "facts" to check or not are all part of their repertoire of deceptive tricks.

      The abuse done to honesty by "fact-checkers" is worse than the blatant lies of Trump and his PR team.

    14. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats it called again when you remember things that didn't actually happen, umm, errr, oh that's right, the correct word for what you are having isn't memory, it's delusion.

      glad I could help

    15. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I do remember when a certain tan-suited "president" decided to go on an apology tour and apologize to every nation he could about America being a land of opportunity.

      No president has apologized for America as abjectly and thoroughly as Trump has.

    16. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when the biggest domestic scandal involved a president getting a blowjob?

      Ain't it better to just get caught rigging elections?

      Good times.

    17. Re:Nostalgia by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Lack of controversy in foreign relations simply means that nothing is happening - the status quo is being maintained. Which is great if you're happy with the status quo. But the majority of the world still lives under repressive regimes. So I'd classify maintaining the status quo as a foreign relations failure; a path chosen by a leader who was too afraid to take risks to try to change the world for the better.

      I'm scared to death of how Trump is handling foreign relations. But I readily admit he's shaking things up, and the world will not be the same when he leaves office. Whether it's better or worse remains to be seen. But the Cold War didn't end because we maintained the status quo. Those of you who weren't alive at the time probably don't realize how much flak Reagan caught for "provoking" the Soviets by calling it an evil empire. Likewise, Korea has remained divided for nearly 70 years because we sought to maintain the status quo there. At some point you have to trust that on average things done by free democracies make the world better. So shaking things up on average yields better results than maintaining the status quo. Just like investing in stocks on average yields better returns than putting your money in a savings account, on average it's better to roll the dice than to play it safe.

    18. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a certain tan-suited "president"

      Is there another word you dearly wanted to use, but decided against it because you're a pathetic little lily-wight alt-right milksop who doesn't want to get his fucking head kicked in by a proud law abiding black man?

      How the fuck do you expect to win the race war you're trying to start? We'll fucking annihilate you in the first week.

    19. Re:Nostalgia by anss123 · · Score: 1

      That quote is not an apology. "there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive" is not an apology and anyone seeking an apology would be dissatisfied with such a statement.

      Neither is this an apology: "I regret that you feel this way."

    20. Re:Nostalgia by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > Remember when the biggest foreign relations scandal involving a president was giving a bust of Churchill back to England?

      This is not a scandal involving president. Did you not read the whole summary ?
      the chip is an advertised feature of the Adidas AG ball
      This is a scandal involving main stream liberal leaning media and the idiots that work there pretending to be journalists.

      And people like you gobble it all up because brain damage seem to be rampant among people leaning to the left.. (don't worry... the ones on the right are same type of cattle).

    21. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about giving a "reset button" to Russia when they had just done this in the past year:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Russo-Georgian_diplomatic_crisis

    22. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Likewise, Korea has remained divided for nearly 70 years because we sought to maintain the status quo there.

      If the USA invaded DPRK to unify Korea and the "capitalist / imperialist" troops thus eventually approached or reached the Chinese border, Beijing would resort to nukes, because such a move would threaten her very existence.

    23. Re:Nostalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      This is not a scandal involving president. Did you not read the whole summary ?
      the chip is an advertised feature of the Adidas AG ball

      I wasn't referring to the story about the ball. I was referring to the treason. The conspiring with a foreign power to fix an election and then paying them back with policies.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Nostalgia by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > I wasn't referring to the story about the ball. I was referring to the treason. The conspiring with a foreign power to fix an election and then paying them back with policies.

      Right. So just because somebody is repeating the some narrative over and over again you take it as evidence it actually happened ?
      I have no horse in this race... but i can smell when the sh*t stinks, no matter what somebody tells me.

      I can't imagine that anybody wanted Trump to win elections (even the Trump voters, who voted for Trump just to screw over Hillary).

      And I can't see why Putin would care for Trump to win over Hillary, Feel free to enlighten me.

    25. Re:Nostalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I have no horse in this race... but i can smell when the sh*t stinks

      Did you check your shorts? Just sayin'.

      And I can't see why Putin would care for Trump to win over Hillary, Feel free to enlighten me.

      He wants to reestablish the Soviet Union and a weak American president over whom he has kompromat can help him with that.

      But don't take my word for it, Putin said it himself in no uncertain terms that he wanted Trump to win:

      https://www.theatlantic.com/in...

      Even the White House, which for some reason edited the official transcript of Putin's remarks, which were made on camera, had to finally put them back, because editing out Putin saying, "Yes, I wanted Trump to win" just made Trump look even more guilty, and at this point, they're just trying to put out the wildfire that's headed their way.

      http://thehill.com/homenews/ad...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    26. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how rightards always leave out the part that Clinton was 1 of 9 people on a committee to approve that deal, that only needed 5 votes, which Clinton never cast. Reality is not your strong suit :)

  21. Can I just ask why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why, in the name of all that is or ever will be, would a gawds damned soccer ball need to be wireless enabled? Yes, I see the little sales blurb there trying to justify a $165 souvenir ball. Fine, whatever, dipshits gonna dipshit cause gadget overload is never enough, but why cooked this shit up? The internet of shit thing is really getting out of hand. It's seriously to the point where I wouldn't be surprised if our toilets get wireless enabled so they can report the content of our excrement directly to our doctors/insurance company so they can nail us on violations of whatever bullshit health code they've cooked up we're supposed to follow that day.

    Anybody supporting that level of dumbfuckery (the ball, as I don't *THINK* the toilet exists . . . yet) needs a good swift kick in the jigglers.

    On top of that, since that's the actual configuration of the ball, they could have hidden some real spying devices within it and disguised them as the official version's antenna. This whole thing has me wantin' to smack my head into the wall repeatedly until I lose consciousness and just hope I don't wake up. Too much stupid in the world to take.

  22. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a non story its a feature of the soccer ball.

  23. you is a lame gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so you believe them when they tell you what is in there

    did you miss the "trojan horse" story in school or are you really that stupid?

    1. Re: you is a lame gimmick by kenh · · Score: 1

      You're right:

      it has a GPS tracking device, with no Antenna,
      it is a bug with no microphone,
      it is a bomb with no explosives...

      The assumption is that Trump will put the ball on his desk in the Oval Office and conduct secret, high-level meetings with it in the room.

      (You realize there is no power source in the ball, right?)

      --
      Ken
    2. Re: you is a lame gimmick by Strider- · · Score: 1

      (You realize there is no power source in the ball, right?)

      You've clearly never heard of The Thing have you? </tinfoilhat>

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  24. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be religious if you believe that nonesense. Same things that religions do. They basically say "Do our bidding in this life, so that you can get your big pay off (aka slam dunk) in the next one... maybe... if it exists... but we assure you exists so you have nothing to worry about obviously"

  25. it's a keeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The transmitter clues on the outside are just a distraction from the interior, where the Keeper lived. You just wait, Trump is suddenly going to start making sense and speaking rationally. Only when he drinks (which he's not yet known for doing) will he be able to honestly speak his mind. (Keepers can't handle booze.)

    1. Re:it's a keeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Re:Orange dipshit by greythax · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I know! People were so mad at the left last time that they lost by negative 3 million votes!

  27. It's a fucking QR code. by Falos · · Score: 1

    That's probably all it does. An access token at best, yes, and even that is doubtful since it's meant to send your phone to promotional material. Which, judging how see socnet users froth over cinema adverts (aka trailers), is a smart move for Adidas.

  28. Theremin would have done it with more style : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And many years ago, he did :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

  29. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny because you can't refute any part of what they said though. You can only change the subject like an Ivanbot.

    #Mueller doesn't mind, go ahead and try lol

    #Mountain of damning evidence

  30. Re:Orange dipshit by hey! · · Score: 1

    If you are waiting for indictments for "collusion", there won't be because there is no crime called "collusion"; when collusion is criminal, it's called conspiracy.

    So far there have been two indictments of American citizens for "Conspiracy against the United States": Paul Manafort and Rick Gates. Gates struck a deal in which he pled guilty, and he's now a cooperating witness.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  31. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know where the failure is. He's president of the United States. He's worth billions now. He's improved communities all over the country, and created jobs. He's been nothing but golden for our economy. If you want to focus on the times he's failed I guess you can do that, but you're obviously ignoring the many more times he's been successful.

  32. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia ball kicks you.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      YES! A soviet russia joke!

  33. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tried to find the like button for this reply.

    Let's pretend that one exists

    [X] Like Post

    There, maga

  34. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And replace them with your fucking traitors and asshats?

    I think you aren't giving Pence a fair chance. He's a disgusting person, but I fucking swear, he's not a spoiled child like Trump. He'll merely push for evil things, not insane evil things. He's relatively oldschool. And he can be replaced with the 2020 election, unless Republicans really just can't do better. Or he can be replaced earlier, if he is just another criminal too. But there are actually good reasons to believe Pence is not a criminal the way Trump is. Pence is merely an anti-American asshole. Maybe you don't want an anti-American asshole as president, but as you've seen, we can do a lot worse.

  35. Re:It will be great when Trump hangs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd travel to DC for that. Make public like the good old days. Trump loves the good old days.

  36. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: gather underpants
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Fail to make a billion dollars.

  37. Re:Orange dipshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yet, he was able to beat the smartest woman on the Planet in the race to become President. We could all be so lucky to be a failed billionaire present with a supermodel wife.

    Still waiting on the Russia evidence. How many Mueller indictments were there for Russian COLLUSION so far? None? Oh yea, lets indict a couple of russian ham sandwiches that will never show up in court to show some value for the millions spent covering up the incompetence of the Clinton campaign (Yes, yes, we all know that Putin personally prevented Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin and Michigan).

    Watergate investigation took 4 years.

    Clinton investigation took 6 years.

    Mueller has only taken about 18 months.

    And we taxpayers have spent more money flying Trumpoid down to Mar-a-Lago and providing SS protection there, just so he can GOLF than the Mueller investigation has cost so far.

    So kindly STFU and FOAD, toadie.

  38. Just as important as the Russian meddling... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

    is can they embed some sort of position-tracking chip in the ball so when players kick it high the video stream is augmented to show the vertical projection of the ball on the grass in real time? Not knowing in which direction the ball is going always bothered me when watching the game on the 2D screen.

  39. Re:Orange dipshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

    I know! People were so mad at the left last time that they lost by negative 3 million votes!

    Perfect!

  40. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird how they had 3 million "votes" in states with no voter ID requirement and that use unverifiable voting machines. Yet for some reason, it's the left that blocks every attempt to secure our polling places from voter fraud. The left that routinely brings in busloads of people to polling places. Gee, I wonder why that might be?

    #WalkAway is still a growing movement. It's amazing how quickly it grew once it was given a name: many people had already done it, they just didn't realize how many had joined them.

    But go ahead, tell me about this mythical "blue wave" that no reputable poll has ever shown.

  41. Re:Orange dipshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    This is a non story its a feature of the soccer ball.

    That was before the Russians re-flashed the code in it.

  42. Stupid clickbait headline. by smithmc · · Score: 1

    Keep stupid clickbait headlines off Slashdot, will ya?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  43. How does this work? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    (Apologies in advance for not sticking to trump-bashing/trump-worship topic)

    How does the NFC thing work? Seems like marketing hype (well, duh):

    During manufacturing, the NFC chip is placed inside the ball under that logo, which resembles the icon for a WiFi signal, according to the Adidas website. The chip allows fans to access player videos, competitions and other content by bringing their mobile devices close to the ball.

    Let's say I'm watching the France/Croatia game at the World Cup and I want to see one of those player videos of Kylian Mbappe. All I have to do is run onto the field, grab the ball and hold my phone near it? Sounds like a lot of work. Well, compared to drinking too much beer and starting a fight with the other team's fans.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:How does this work? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Location and distance to the sport. It gets people to the location of the game to use their mobile devices.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  44. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the left allow illegal to vote in their elections. Their credibility is shot.

  45. Re: Trump is a traitor by jimtheowl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, it seems like it is intentionally pathetic so that it would make the "liberal side" look so.

  46. Re:Orange dipshit by Train0987 · · Score: 4, Informative

    the Watergate break in was in 1972. Nixon resigned in 1974. 2 years.

    Ken Starr was appointed special counsel in 1994. Clinton was impeached in 1998. 4 years.

    Why make up dumb shit?

  47. russia russia russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trump got cucked by putin hahahhaa

    Well, his idol definitely got the upper hand. It's going to take a bit for trump to clean that cream off his chin; but we know he'll be back for more.

  48. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Traitors and asshats

    Yeah, sure, 'traitors and asshats' that will actually protect the environment (you know, the air you breathe, the water you drink, and so on), not allow the destruction of animal species for no damned good reason, that won't destroy public education in favor of 'vouchers' that only benefit The Rich and leave The Poor and middle-class with shit schools and shit teachers, not sabotage the national economy with 'tax cuts' that only benefit The Rich and fuck over everyone else, not have a neo-nazi heading up the DoJ, not shit on the long-time allies of the U.S., not piss off the entire world with heavy-handed 'trade tariffs' instead of taking a more thoughtful and measured approach, not tearing apart families for having the almighty GALL to want to get their children away from violent regimes and violent drug cartels, not hand the Internet to greedy ISPs on a silver platter, fucking over the American consumer in the process, not appoint neo-nazis to the Supreme Court, helping drag us back socio-politically to the 1940's, and so on, and so on, and so on. Get your heads out of your asses and stop helping fuck over the country you live in, you mongoloids.

  49. Re:Why oh why did BSD die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went out to *BSD's grave on Decoration Day. The old forgotten cemetery is to be found adjacent to the dark woods beyond the edge of town. There within olfactory distance of the municipal treatment plant you will find *BSD's final resting place.

    *BSD's tombstone was shrouded by thick mosses and knots of noxious ivy. A mournful funerary crow sounded the requiem, as I gently pulled aside the tangled twists of thorns, and cleaned the decaying marker the best I could. A suffocating melancholia filled my heart, while I pondered that this indeed was *BSD's figurative charnel house of which so many have plaintively spoken.

    Nothing is so pitiful as an untended grave, a loved one now forgotten. The short sad life of this doomed and fated OS makes us realize that there but for the grace of God go all of us.

    I planted some wilting marigolds, found discarded in the waste heap behind the caretaker's shack, wishing that by some miracle these fleurs de mort might take root and bring a modicum of cheer to *BSD's God forsaken plot. My fervent hope is that the torpid colored boy, who so carelessly mows the grounds, doesn't slice them down, inadvertently mirroring *BSD's own doomed encounter with death's irresistible scythe.

    Funny how things work out. Linux, that brilliant novam stellam, now runs the Internet and the world's fastest computers, while *BSD lies moldering within its forgotten crypt. Let the barren silence of *BSD's tomb be a mute reminder that hubris and braggadocio were no defense on that woeful day when the Angel of Death's bleak umbra was cast upon *BSD.

  50. You joke, I'd love to see her run by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    She won't win (she's got the charisma of a dead trout and she's pretty much persona non grata in the party after losing to his orangeness) but she'd draw so much fire it'd be smooth sailing for the Dems.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You joke, I'd love to see her run by Train0987 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can she not win this time if she would've won last time without The Russians! meddling? If not for Putin she'd be running for re-election in 2020. Right?

  51. NFC is effectively RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NFC is effectively RFID, which has been used to track razor blades at walmart for over a decade. It can contain data like a QRcode does if there are enough bits.
    NFC on smarted devices allows dynamic RFID stuff - like payment systems.

    Had a Nexus4 which claimed to have NFC support. It worked, sometimes, but it wasn't consistent enough for me to trust it. I have a Yubikey with NFC support for 2-factor auth. It worked with the N4 about 1:20 attempts under very controlled use.

    NFC seems to be 5cm or less, but there have been proven cases of 5m and more. I'd feel better using a QRcode.

  52. Re:It will be great when Trump hangs. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to get into whether I believe Trump is guilty of this, that, or the other thing, but I really do need to point out your ignorance. The conviction you're asking for is precisely the upholding the AC above you is calling for.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  53. Re:Why oh why did BSD die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got to look at the "big picture". Real straight up BSD has no market share left. Even NetCraft admits it. One BSD that has hit rock bottom is FreeBSD. FreeBSD doesn't even register on NetCraft's surveys anymore. That is a humiliating fall into obscurity. We looked at the situation from all angles, and for what ever definition you choose, my IT business concluded that BSD is dead. No "ands", "ifs", or "buts". It's time to grow up, and face reality. Sorry!

  54. Re:Orange dipshit by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Well, it looks like you just have to sit and wait for 30 more months to disprove his point. Good on you for correcting him to no real end, though.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  55. Re: Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly astroturfing tea-party trumptard, liberals are against the death penalty.

  56. Re: Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it seems like it is intentionally pathetic so that it would make the "liberal side" look so.

    LOL that would be gilding the lily. The left has no need to be made to look pathetic. Give me a call when they have stopped promoting teaching 5 year olds how to be drag queens, or giving hormones to pre pubescents, or just trying to gloss over pedophilia in people jeffrey epstein.

    I mean either they were clueless to the point of needing to be institutionalized or they didn't care about Harvey Weinstein's habits as long he said the right things.

  57. Re:It will be great when Trump hangs. by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to get into whether I believe Trump is guilty of this, that, or the other thing, but I really do need to point out your ignorance. The conviction you're asking for is precisely the upholding the AC above you is calling for.

    Conviction first, trial and evidence maybe later. Da comrade, maybe they will reopen the chekka so you can have a job.

  58. Goal Line Technology ? by Laxator2 · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, Goal Line Technology relies on a couple of RFID chips being placed on the ball. Then they communicate with sensors placed on the goal posts and crossbar.

    However, I'm sure the sensors are used to spy on the goalkeepers.

  59. Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > And we taxpayers have spent more money flying Trumpoid down to Mar-a-Lago and providing SS protection there, just so he can GOLF than the Mueller investigation has cost so far.

    I'm curious what point you were trying to make via this? That we have to spend a lot because unhinged leftists want to kill him?

  60. Re:It will be great when Trump hangs. by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not sure if trolling or lacking reading comprehension...

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  61. (Adi)Das Vadanya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That settles it! Adidas is in cohorts with the KGB....

  62. Thisnis how german rataliation looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US did bug Merkel.

  63. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed.

    Let's follow the left into it's socialist utopia of safe spaces, support for mass illegal immigration, 8 billion pronouns, "diversity", thought police, protests for everything, high taxes, affirmative action, micro-aggressions, identity politics, anti-white/asian/male rhetoric, bending over to foreign gov'ts, shitty school lunches, tearing down historical statues, warnings/labels/regulations for everything, etc (sorry, I got bored writing this list).

    Anyway, the left is so lame it hurts.

    PS Yo where's PopeRatzo? These threads always bring you two out.

  64. A matter of interpretation by Texmaize · · Score: 2

    When you dig deeper in the articles, and read the speeches and comments, they really do sound apologetic. However, the analysts, from sources that are not what one would call right leaning, all seem to miss this. Bias is what bias does, but hey, congrats on being modded up for expressing a liberal leaning view on slashdot. In other news, the sky is blue...

    https://www.politifact.com/tru...

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
    1. Re:A matter of interpretation by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      When you dig deeper in the articles, and read the speeches and comments, they really do sound apologetic.

      Give me an honest answer: Do any of Obama comments rise to the level at which Trump was making excuses for Russia with the following remarks?

      "In an interview with Fox News's Bill O'Reilly, which will air ahead of the Super Bowl on Sunday, Trump doubled down on his “respect” for Putin — even in the face of accusations that Putin and his associates have murdered journalists and dissidents in Russia.

      “I do respect him. Well, I respect a lot of people, but that doesn’t mean I’ll get along with them,” Trump told O'Reilly.

      O'Reilly pressed on, declaring to the president that “Putin is a killer.”

      Unfazed, Trump didn't back away, but rather compared Putin's reputation for extrajudicial killings with the United States'.

      “There are a lot of killers. We have a lot of killers,” Trump said. “Well, you think our country is so innocent?”

      I want you to read that last sentence again: "well, you think our country is so innocent?" and ask yourself what the narrative would be if Obama had said that.

      I know that the steady stream of outrage, corruption, ridiculousness, disinformation and misdirection can mean a lot of Trump's stuff gets lost in the shuffle. But even a staunchly conservative publication like the Weekly Standard can recognize that Trump blames America first.

      https://www.weeklystandard.com...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:A matter of interpretation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me an honest answer: Do any of Obama comments rise to the level at which Trump was making excuses for Russia with the following remarks?

      Nice whataboutism ya got there - the two things are not the same.

      Obama's comments are far worse. Trump supports the US. Obama NEVER DID and neither do you.

  65. Re:Orange dipshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    the Watergate break in was in 1972. Nixon resigned in 1974. 2 years.

    Ken Starr was appointed special counsel in 1994. Clinton was impeached in 1998. 4 years.

    Why make up dumb shit?

    I wasn't making shit up; just misremembering something I saw a few months ago. Didn't take the time to re look it up while at work.

    I also note that you didn't refute my statement regarding the cost...

  66. No the USA does stuff like this all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously the CIA and NSA openly^H^H^H^H admit to doing this sort of thing all the time when their officers retire and publish their memoirs... in books..... they write what they did as a spy in a book that people read after they retire.
    Sadly you're a "low information" voter.

  67. Re:Orange dipshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    the Watergate break in was in 1972. Nixon resigned in 1974. 2 years.

    Ken Starr was appointed special counsel in 1994. Clinton was impeached in 1998. 4 years.

    Why make up dumb shit?

    You appear to be correct about Watergate; but you are REALLY off on The whole Clinton saga:

    https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

  68. Re: Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The commercial version of the ball links to a website with world cup related videos. Trumps special ball may have been reprogrammed. For example, it may link to a website with a list of demands and a teaser of the pee-tapes. Or maybe the NFC has been modified to look harmless on the surface, but if the agent authenticates with the right key they can use the NFC connection to download the audio that the ball has stored.

  69. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, most of the money being paid to Mar-a-Lago goes to Trump, which in turn goes to Russian and Chinese oligarchs because Trump owes them bigly.

  70. NFC by Donwulff · · Score: 2

    In most cases, like this, an NFC chip is correctly described as transponder, not transmitter. It's a passive device that responds to magnetic field, at lengths around half a feet. So the "transmitter" headline is clickbait unfit for a (former) tech-site. It also seems like classic red herring, nobody knows if the ball was equipped with other toys by Russia, focusing on a known passive transponder distracts from that. On the other hand I get the joke potential as world leaders tend to receive gifts at every meeting, and there are certainly existing protocols to protect them from eavesdropping, bombs etc. Of particular note in this context, the briefcase that follows POTUS around and contains all the nuclear missile launch codes etc. is known as the "nuclear football" making things weird for this particular analogy.

    1. Re:NFC by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Remember the embassy listening bug hack? That was materially similar to RFID. Now here we are arguing about an RFID tag. What if the tag plus the ball equals a wireless microphone and a RFID sniper device sending the proper signal to the ball both activates it and receives the signal? It's well within the range of technical possibility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  71. paranoia, insanity and stupidity by Tom · · Score: 2

    Putin is a trained KGB agent. You seriouly think he and his people would come up with something so obvious and stupid and easily detectable? Seriously?

    The problem with the hysteria, both the anti-Trump and the anti-Russia one, is that it is a stupidity epidemic. It contains too much disdain and makes you underestimate them. Both. Trump, for all the spectacle and shouting, actually did a few things right. And Putin, whatever you think about him, is not an idiot.

    I'm sure the Russians are spying on the Americans - just like vice versa. But they would be idiots to do it like this. Someone watched too many stupid Hollywood spy movies.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  72. We need an anti-clickbait AI by rodia · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is the second piece of clickbaity nonsense today. Not as bad as the Falcon rocket thing, but pretty annoying. In retrospect, the headlines kind of gave it away, but me-monkey clicked anyway. How about a service that lets people tag headlines as clickbait and learns from them, like a mail spam filter?

  73. Re: Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liberals don't need anybody's help to look pathetic.

    Bonus captcha: "shiftily"

  74. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's okay, Trump can get away with being full of shit, so can you.

  75. Re: Trump is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be the russians!

  76. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0
    Calling others Nazis, and then following it up with a racist slur "mongoloid". Who wouldn't want to be governed by the likes of you?

    (Yoda voice) This is why you lost...

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  77. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yeah your side is just that bad."

    Ha ha. You're a fucking idiot.

  78. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    We had eight years of nothing but amateur hour with Obama

    And the country was better for it in every metric. That doesn't bode well for every other government if you consider that one amateur.

  79. This by f3rret · · Score: 1
    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  80. uh, because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are Trump-hating leftwing outlets in the US who are hyping this as a new anti-Trump meme: Trump so stupid Putin gave him a bugged ball right in front of the world.

    To believe it, however, you have to be a doofus who wraps foil around his/her/its head and thinks places like CNN are providing "news".

    Breaking News: Trump-Russia-Adidas Collusion!!!!!

    The absolute total insanity of Hillary supporters seems to know no bounds. The election ended almost two years ago, and they still cannot wrap their brains around it. They were so sure Hillary would win and Trump could not that they rigged their own Democrat primary to make sure she and not Bernie was the nominee, then they rigged the FBI investigation so that Hillary was not prosecuted for a long list of felonies, then they took a piece of Hillary campaign propaganda her team bought from a foreign spy who got it from Russians and used it to start a fake investigation of Trump to blow him to bits---- and Hillary STILL lost. I suppose their complete meltdown is a bit understandable now that I review what happened...

  81. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

    As much as I hate having to defend Trump & Co, it's not like Obama & Co all that much better when they were in power. Despite many promises under Obama's watch the rich still payed way less than what they should, the oil industry were not only allowed to continue to expand their "fracking" operations with little regard to the environment, but also continue having an exception to environmental protection laws like the Clean Water Act (which absolutely baffles me personally), the war on drugs and terror only escalated, old import tariffs like the 25% "chicken tax" on light trucks, cemented in place by Lyndon B Johnson to win over special interests, were left completely untouched, allowed the SEC to be staffed by the sector it's supposed to be a watchdog and regulator of along with mass dragnet spying and general privacy violations reaching an absolute staggering all time high as shown by the Snowden leaks. Hell, even Obama's much praised net neutrality rules required mass outrage to get put in place.

    When you consider all of this, Trump & Co really aren't that big of a step backwards. Maybe I'm just a bitter Bernie Sanders supporter, but at least I'm capable of seeing the flaws in Obama's slightly-less-corrupt government.

    --
    "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
  82. Real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putin was actually introducing Russia Pay. You pay with your balls.

  83. Re: Trump is a traitor by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Putting enough flash into the ball to store audio would be obvious because it would require external power and you could find the battery with a scan. But making it a remotely powered microphone could be accomplished imperceptibly. Either way the smart thing would be to microwave it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  84. Re: Trump is a traitor by khandom08 · · Score: 1

    Either way the smart thing would be to microwave it.

    nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  85. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, Obama solved climate change, fixed healthcare, outmaneuvered Russia in Crimea and Syria and Ukraine, properly regulated wall street, reversed income inequality trajectory, ended disastrous globalist free trade agreements like the TPP, set race relations on the right track, and reigned in the treasonous security agencies who constantly lie and fabricate evidence to get the country involved in war and conflict.

    Oh wait no, the opposite of all those things. No hope, no change.

  86. then Putin sucks as a negotiator by tacokill · · Score: 1

    If Putin has Trump by the balls, then he really sucks as a negotiator because Trump doesn't seem to be helping Russia much at all. If I were Putin, I'd expect a little more out of my minion.

    1. Re:then Putin sucks as a negotiator by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I agree, Trump is very incompetent at most things he does.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  87. Re:Orange dipshit by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Hey look, an idiot who plays chess, thinking he won, because he had more pieces on the board. Unaware that Check Mate doesn't require much in the way of pieces on the board.

    Keep arguing from stupidity and you'll keep losing.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  88. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention a peaceful North Korea...

    Oh wait, that was President Trump, too.

  89. Re: Orange dipshit by greythax · · Score: 1

    Anyone with half a brain realized that comment was about the candidates popularity, and not the electoral college. But by all means, keep dropping your "wisdom."

  90. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2
    Here, allow me to translate what you're saying, for the benefit of the rest of the readers of Slashdot:

    Everything in my world has to be either one extreme or the other extreme, there can't be ANY COMPROMISES of any kind!

    Fuck off. I can't even tell anymore which of you are just the garden-variety trolls and which of you really as as fucktardedly stupid as you sound.

  91. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I call 'em like I see 'em. If you're going to make fucktarded statements like some genetic throwback, then maybe you are. Besides, it's not like anyone pulls their punches with me or anyone else, so why the fuck shouldn't I? BTW you're likely another fucktarded Trumpite therefore you can fuck ott too.

  92. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Listen, buddy: I may have voted for Obama, but I far from agreed with everything he did, and assuming (like the fucktard a few above you here) that everything has to be extremes in one direction or the other is just fucked up, too. I voted for Obama because the alternative was even worse. But I didn't agree with or wanted the ACA, I think it's wrong to force someone to purchase something they may not want or need or can really afford; it's a drain on me financially, personally. I also don't agree with the way he handled some foreign matters. But meanwhile, just like always, because the wheels of government turn very slowly, Trump is taking credit for things Obama did that are just showing their positive effects now, and by the way let's be honest about it: the Bush Administration more or less took a sledgehammer to the toilets (so to speak) when they left office, leaving Obama with a gods-be-damned mess to clean up, and in the middle of a recession (which one could argue was because of so many years of one Bush or the other) so he was way down in the red just to start with, and I think that being considered he did a pretty damned good job overall even if I didn't agree with everything he did or said. Meanwhile Donald Trump is trying to drag the United States back to about 1940 socially and poltically, he keeps appointing extremists of one degree or another, many of which are flat-out corrupt, most of which seem to have their own agendas that have nothing to do with serving the United States of America, and he's about as untrustworthy overall as anyone could possibly be. I didn't vote for the son of a bitch, I didn't vote for Clinton because I don't trust her either (but I may as well have), I voted for the Green Party candidate (who was it, even, I don't even remember now!) because so far as I'm concerned you MUST vote. But I'm not going to sit here and listen to someone talking to ***ME*** like I'm some robot that just repeats what he's told to repeat, I was not affililated with ANY political party before about 3 months ago and now I HAVE to be Democrat to help restore some sense of balance to this countrys' government, which if you didn't notice has gone COMPLETELY out-of-balance, and like a poorly loaded washing machine on spin-cycle it's threatening to tear itself apart because half or less of the people in this country are having their interests addressed, the rest are functionally-speaking being told to FUCK OFF and quite frankly that makes me wonder if there's going to BE a country much longer. So excuse me if I'm not going to sit on my hands like some fucking coward and keep my mouth shut, I'll make all the noise I want to about this, it's my DUTY as a citizen of this country to utilize my right to freedom of speech and speak out about things I think are wrong. I don't HAVE to 'suppor the president' or his Administration, that's not what this country is about, it's not a dictatorship, dissent is part of our national DNA, and I'll be damned if anyone on either side of the aisle is going to hush me up just because they don't like what I have to say.

  93. Firmware? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Has the idiot had security check the firmware on the chip, to see whether it's *only* broadcasting what it's supposed to?

    I can just see it now, Putin visits the WH, and puts a collar and leash on Trumpolini, and walks him around the WH.

  94. Re: Orange dipshit by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    People with slightly more than half a brain don't use measurements that don't matter. The Hindenburg was HUGE how did it fly????? (for example).

    And she was "more popular" is also a non-sequitor, because she didn't get 50% of the vote. She was very popular where it where it mattered less, and less so where it mattered more. It also doesn't count votes that would have changed, people who would have voted that didn't because they are R in California (for example). The resources spent campaigning would have gone elsewhere, changing the votes in both places.

    So, in conclusion, it is meaningless sour grapes by people who can't believe she lost to probably someone who was equally bad as an option. I "wasted" my vote for voting for neither of them.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  95. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why we can't lump the trolls in with the stupid here. Fuck both of those crowds.

  96. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

    Sure, that all sounds good and dandy, and no one would argue we don't need some rigorous environmental protection. The real problem is these government agencies (FBI, EPA, etc, etc) have gone unchecked, unchallenged, and unmanaged for so long they have become corrupt versions of what we hope them to be. To your next point, sometimes balance is only achieved from bouncing from one 'extreme' to another, but I don't feel either end is really as extreme as we make them out to be.

  97. Re:Orange dipshit by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

    They different is Watergate/Clinton investigations were started due to some pretty clear and damning evidence. Occam's Razor suggests the most likely instigating factor for the Mueller investigations was some political impropriety and fearmongering on the Democrat's part. In terms of real evidence pointing to a massive conspiracy by the Trump campaign to collude with Russia (on anything), it is objectively almost nothing. It still may or may not be true, but I don't think anyone can deny Democrats have twisted themselves in circles trying to convince the world of some massive conspiracy, a la 9/11 truthers.

  98. Re:Orange dipshit by Talderas · · Score: 1

    So far there have been two indictments of American citizens for "Conspiracy against the United States": Paul Manafort and Rick Gates. Gates struck a deal in which he pled guilty, and he's now a cooperating witness.

    You're talking about this indictment for Paul Manafort and Richard Gates?

    Conspiracy Against the United States is a specific crime under 18 U.S.C. 371. None of these indictments were under that code. The were indicted for Bank Fraud Conspiracy which falls under 18 U.S.C. 1349 and 3551.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  99. Yakov by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    In the Soviet Russia, Adidas Spies on You!

    1. Re:Yakov by whitroth · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly! In America, every company does their best to spy on you.

  100. Re:Orange dipshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    They different is Watergate/Clinton investigations were started due to some pretty clear and damning evidence. Occam's Razor suggests the most likely instigating factor for the Mueller investigations was some political impropriety and fearmongering on the Democrat's part. In terms of real evidence pointing to a massive conspiracy by the Trump campaign to collude with Russia (on anything), it is objectively almost nothing. It still may or may not be true, but I don't think anyone can deny Democrats have twisted themselves in circles trying to convince the world of some massive conspiracy, a la 9/11 truthers.

    And I'm going to seriously consider the opinion of someone who starts a Post with "They different"?

    And just remember, after Trump stated Publicly that handing over Ambassador McFaul to Putin's gang of thugs for "Interviewing" was actually "worth Considering", the Senate voted 98-0 last week to block that idea.

    http://time.com/5343322/michae...

    Oh, and when Articles of Impeachment against Assistant AG Rob Rosenstein were filed in the House last night, only ELEVEN ***REPUBLICANS*** (out of 236 Representatives total) jumped on the bandwagon. Even Speaker of the House Paul Ryan spoke out Publicly against the measure. Even Trey Gowdy, who is NO supporter of the Mueller Investigation, said of the Rosenstein Impeachment attempt: "Impeach him? For What?"

    https://www.newsweek.com/rod-r...

    And in fact, those Eleven Traitorous Republicans have already turned tail and run home:

    https://www.vox.com/2018/7/26/...

    Yep. Sounds like the Democrats are the only ones that are beginning to think "something's up"...

    Gimme a break, willya?

    MAGAP

    (Make America Get Another President (tm))

  101. Rosebud! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Rosebud! Rosebud. Rosebud...

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  102. Re:Orange dipshit by hey! · · Score: 1

    Manafort's indictment was updated in June to include charges under 18 U.S.C. 2, 371. Google Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 318. This was after Gates pleaded guilty to violating the same law in February (google Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ document 195), and was possibly a result of Gates subsequent cooperation with federal prosecutors.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  103. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    So you start off by saying you don't want one extreme or another, then at the end you basically say "I'm an extremist". Well played.

  104. Re:It's time to unite for MAGA by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    There are powerful people that make a great deal of money with problems in the country. People that would have to get a real job if it weren't for their manufactured crisis.
    Take the whole mother/child separation bullshit. This happens every day to American women when they go to jail. Yet somehow it's not supposed to happen to an illegal that broke the law coming into the country? Why? It's a lie wrapped up in a moral argument.

  105. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    North Korea is peaceful? How? The same government, still has nuclear weapons, still develops delivery systems, still executes political prisoners. What has changed?

  106. Re: Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do worse with your inheritance billions than the market would have.

    As Forbes calculated back.in 2016.

  107. Re: It's time to unite for MAGA by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    You're against racism but have no problem using racial slurs. Do you see the issue there?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  108. Putin gave Trump a futbol with a launch code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a sly joke about Russia making Trump president and putting him in charge of the nuclear football? 'Balls in your court, don't start a nuclear war.'

  109. Re:Orange dipshit by Talderas · · Score: 1

    Yes, that superseding indictment doesn't really add much and you're correct that Gates cooperation is the likely cause for it.

    The conspiracy in question, though, isn't any new crime. It's still related to the previous crimes for which Manafort was indicted. It was the conspiracy to defraud the US by hiding the financial transactions and holdings that occurred between 2006 and 2016. Gates provided the testimonial evidence to prove that Manafort and others conspired to perform the actions rather than just the actions being committed independently.

    From in or about and between 2006 and 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendant PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., together with others, knowingly and intentionally conspired to defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful governmental functions of a government agency, namely the Department of Justice and the Treasury, and to commit offenses against the United States, to wit: the violations of law charged in Counts Three, Four, and Five, and to unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly fail to file with the Treasury an FBAR disclosing a financial interest in, and signature and other authority over, a bank, securities, and other financial account in a foreign country, which had an aggregate value of more than $10,000 in a 12-month period, in violation of 31 U.S.C. 5314 and 5322(a). 39. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect its illegal

    While you are technically correct that "Conspiracy Against the United States" has been seen in an indictment from the Mueller investigation, it's a fact that isn't relevant to the AC to which you were pointing it out. That AC was referencing the Russia collusion narrative. You pointed out that it would show up as Conspiracy Against the United States and that such an indictment occurred. The conspiracy which Mueller indicted for has no relevance to the Russia collusion narrative. The nature of the conspiracy which is indicted is important as it is an umbrella crime that can cover a myriad of different offenses and failing to include the context of what the conspiracy was for is misleading at best to try to score cheap political points in favor of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  110. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Hillary conspired with the press to get Donald extra airtime and coverage because he was the only Republican she had a chance of defeating. Apparently she was less popular than she thought and Donald ended up winning.

  111. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they just hacked the Adidas server and this particular serial number has a custom payload.

  112. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask yourself, as you literally just made up dumb shit to refute a correct point. Why are rightards so retarded?

  113. Re:Orange dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here you are with that laughably bad analogy again :) When you grow up, child, you'll realize how much of an idiot you are. Meanwhile us adults would like to continue the conversation without rude interruptions from children.

    I think it is 6th grade where one learns about the EC. I think you have three more grades to go, junior.

  114. Re:Orange dipshit by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    If you believe that he's a billionaire then please explain why he won't release his tax returns and demonstrate on paper what he constantly brags about to anyone within earshot.

    This might help explain why: http://fortune.com/2016/03/23/donald-trump-debt/