Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Forced To Block 20,000 Posts About Snack Food Conspiracy After PepsiCo Sues, Says Report (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: There is a rumor that Kurkure, a corn puff product developed by [Pepsico] in India, is made of plastic. The conspiracy theory naturally thrived online, where people posted mocking videos and posts questioning whether the snack contained plastic. In response, PepsiCo obtained an interim order from the Delhi High Court to block all references to this conspiracy theory online in the country, MediaNama reports. Hundreds of posts claiming that Kurkure contains plastic have already been blocked across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube, according to LiveMint, and the court order requires social networks to continue to block such posts. According to MediaNama, PepsiCo petitioned for 3412 Facebook links, 20244 Facebook posts, 242 YouTube videos, six Instagram links, and 562 tweets to be removed, a request the court has granted. PepsiCo's argument is that these rumors are untrue and defame the brand -- though it's evident that a number of the posts are satirical in tone, poking fun at the rumor rather than earnestly trying to spread misinformation.

118 comments

  1. lol owned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    coke is much better anyway

    1. Re:lol owned by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What happens when they realize the truth of how poisonous this shit actually is? Plastic is harmless...refined flour and sugar...not so much.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re: lol owned by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      They'll just pay some more Harvard professors to blame it on black colored socks.

  2. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ammendment

    1. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which they don't have in India. Thank the Framers that we do here, though.

    2. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sure how I missed the India part of the summary. Good thing I posted as AC!

    3. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank the Framers that we do here, though.

      Libel and slander remain torts in what country you mean.

      This order could be done there, assuming a court had the integrity to support the truth over the liars.

    4. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would not have been able to suppress joke or satirical content here like they did in India. Plus, PepsiCo would have had a much higher bar to overcome to 1) sue John Does; and 2) prove damages.

      Slashdot just recently had a story about Elon Musk calling up the boss of a outed short who was posting negative and flat out false things about Tesla on Twitter and various investment boards. But before the guy was outed, Musk could do little to legally stop him or any other shorts that do the same thing. If it was as easy to shut them up as they were in India, you can bet your ass corporations would be filing tons of gag orders to shut down negative commentary.

    5. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For now, who knows how long until that gets lobbied away.

    6. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an Amendment. It was changed. It can be changed again.

    7. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heil Hitlary!

    8. Re:First by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      What does this have to do with Congress?

    9. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in your lifetime, commie fag.

    10. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Amendment doesn't allow you to say anything you want about anybody. It only shields you from prosecution and retribution from the government or government officials if you say something against them. Saying something about a private citizen or company still opens you up to all sorts of legal obstacles including defamation claims.

      It's a moot point anyway since this is in India, and the laws are not similar in that regard.

    11. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is the 52nd state. duh.

    12. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would not have been able to suppress joke or satirical content here like they did in India.

      Read the order. It didn't occur like you think. Twitter is really just lazy.

      Plus, PepsiCo would have had a much higher bar to overcome to 1) sue John Does; and 2) prove damages.

      The assertion was possibility, not difficulty.

      Slashdot just recently had a story about Elon Musk calling up the boss of a outed short who was posting negative and flat out false things about Tesla on Twitter and various investment boards. But before the guy was outed, Musk could do little to legally stop him or any other shorts that do the same thing. If it was as easy to shut them up as they were in India, you can bet your ass corporations would be filing tons of gag orders to shut down negative commentary.

      I already mentioned that courts in the US have difficulty with integrity. They won't punish those corporations for their lies either. That's the problem.

      Still didn't discount the possibility.

    13. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attempting to manipulate a stock price is illegal. A guy going around and spreading rumors about impending doom of a company, while also shorting its stock, and selling many shares at prices below bid, is a classic indicator of price manipulation. Basically the goal is to induce panic selling, and as the price falls, many automated selloffs also occur on account of stop-loss triggers by individual investors.

      I know because I've seen it happen to one of my small caps. These guys can do a lot of damage to a company that is otherwise doing perfectly fine, sometimes forcing it to close up because it can no longer raise capital from its own stock.

      The difficulty is in finding who is behind it. Many times some firms who only do shorting hire basement dwellers to pretend to be stock experts. These are called paid bashers. Usually they point out minor things as being a reason to divest, when really it ain't shit. Example: One pointed out a reduced profit margin for one quarter as an indicator that the company was going to fail, even though the reduced margin was still above the industry average.

  3. They have a new problem now by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    competition from "Streisand" Cola

    1. Re:They have a new problem now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wouldn't be trying to hide it if they didn't really make it out of plastic. Like Trump's Russiagate.

    2. Re:They have a new problem now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russiagate is plastic?

    3. Re:They have a new problem now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russiagate is plastic?

      Yes, that's the scandal - what happened to the money for the cast iron Russiagate?

  4. Soylent Kurkure by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's not plastic...it's people!!

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  5. Is there really a difference anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been decades since there was a meaningful distinction between cheap junk food and plastic.

    1. Re:Is there really a difference anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People joke all the time about eating "plasti-cheese" and how twinkies are so artificial they last forever. If Pepsico had done nothing, this would've just been like that. Instead, Pepsico is telling us that they do have something real to hide about that product.

      Congratulations, Pepsico, you played yourself.

  6. of course Kurkure isn't made plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's made of people.

  7. No, Seriously... by dark.nebulae · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Kurkure is absolutely made from plastic. Its why all of their shit tastes the same.

  8. If Kurkure isn't made of plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then why was it banned in California along with straws? Hmm, Pepsico? Got an answer for that?

    1. Re:If Kurkure isn't made of plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's actually made from harvested organ leftovers.

    2. Re:If Kurkure isn't made of plastic by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      It isn't actually banned in California, but since they don't have a caste of untouchables who can disappear into the plant without any questions asked, how would you obtain the necessary ingredients for manufacture?!

  9. Creepy precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Court-mandated censorship like this sets a bad & creepy precedent. If the claims are bogus, let them be settled in the traditional manner via libel lawsuits after the fact.

    What if the claims are not completely bogus (not speaking to the merits of this specific instance but a hypothetical future instance)? The public should have a right to know without the imprimatur of corporate interests.

    This is a potentially bad example, but I think it illustrates my point: what if the Soylent corporation were to squelch the claim that "Solyent Green is people"?

    1. Re:Creepy precedent by godel_56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Court-mandated censorship like this sets a bad & creepy precedent. If the claims are bogus, let them be settled in the traditional manner via libel lawsuits after the fact.

      What if the claims are not completely bogus (not speaking to the merits of this specific instance but a hypothetical future instance)? The public should have a right to know without the imprimatur of corporate interests.

      This is India where completely bogus rumors on social media have resulted in angry hordes of people burning or stoning innocents to death. I could easily imagine stores selling these products being looted and burned or the people working in their factories being killed.

    2. Re: Creepy precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, India needs to be kicked off the internet till it gets its shit together. When one tweet is all it takes to assemble a religious flash rape mob, something is really wrong.

    3. Re: Creepy precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seriously, India needs to be kicked off the internet till it gets its shit together."
      Excellent idea, now where is the switch so that 1.3 billion potential customers of US corporations are 'kicked off the internet'

    4. Re:Creepy precedent by ka9dgx · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is India where completely bogus rumors on social media have resulted in angry hordes of people burning or stoning innocents to death. I could easily imagine stores selling these products being looted and burned or the people working in their factories being killed.

      Pikers - This is America where bogus rumors spread by social media resulted in the election a 70 year old reality TV star as our President. The death and destruction this will cause could potentially be of Biblical proportions.

    5. Re: Creepy precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or some orange guy gets elected president...

    6. Re:Creepy precedent by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "This is India where completely bogus rumors on social media have resulted in angry hordes of people burning or stoning innocents to death."

      Not just India. same exact thing happened in Myanmar. I'm sure it has happened elsewhere but those other countries don't have a good flow of information and facebook undoubtedly keeps a tight lid on it.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re:Creepy precedent by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Won't stop anytime soon. Next president? Roll the fucking dice.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    8. Re:Creepy precedent by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Court-mandated censorship like this sets a bad & creepy precedent. If the claims are bogus, let them be settled in the traditional manner via libel lawsuits after the fact.

      I have no idea how precedent works in India's judicial system, but in the US system, this is already a possibility. If a company believes that no reasonable amount of money would adequately compensate them, such as permanent damage to the company's reputation, then they can ask a judge for an injunction against whomever is harming them. It's up to the judge to decide if the damage to the company outweighs the harm that would almost certainly be done by restricting the behavior of the other party.

    9. Re:Creepy precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are naive if you think Hillary did not violate federal law.

  10. The less processed food eaten, the better by beerlord1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For all its many faults, India at least has great food, much of it vegetarian. Why would you eat processed corn crap when you have so much else available?

    1. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For all its many faults, India at least has great food, much of it vegetarian. Why would you eat processed corn crap when you have so much else available?

      It's cheap and it tastes good – for some definition of tastes and good – because it's laden with sugar and salt. Just like the crappy snack "food" we have here.

      You think India doesn't have its share of KFC, Dominos, Krispy Kreme, McDonalds, etc.? Guess again. And yeah, you want a hamburger? You can get one. shhhh, it's water buffalo, don't tell anyone. For that matter it might be beef too. What do you think happens to the cows that die? The Hindus who do eat meat generally won't eat it, but the Christians (28 million of them) and the Muslims (180 million) who aren't vegetarian probably will.)

      As someone who has been to India on business many times, I can assure you that Indians aren't any different than we are when it comes to making bad food choices.

      Oh yeah, WRT "its many faults", people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

    2. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think India doesn't have its share of KFC, Dominos, Krispy Kreme, McDonalds, etc.?

      Of course not, the share is just an order of magnitude smaller than the US, where the boundary between the food industry and the chemical industry is more blurry.

    3. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by lgw · · Score: 2

      For all its many faults, India at least has great food, much of it vegetarian.

      All of my favorite foods are vegetarians as well.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot vegetarians/vegans just have to bring everything back to not eating meat. You strongly resemble fundamentalist Christians, who also have to bring everything back to their god. Your god seems to be anti-meat, and getting everyone on your little bandwagon. Stop it.

    5. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meat is murder

    6. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      Cause life is hard and this stuff has added sugar and pretty packaging.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re:The less processed food eaten, the better by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I thought Americans had a sweet tooth until some Indian friends of mine introduced me to their cuisine. Their sugary after-lunch snacks about made me gag they were so sweet. Literally sugar dipped in sugar sauce.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  11. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when the conspiracy theory is true? There will be no high powered lawyers in court to defend the truth, so corporations can dictate what you're allowed to say? More so than usual, I mean.

  12. Very broad interim order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now this page of Slashdot is illegal in India!

  13. Don't care by PPH · · Score: 1

    Just don't talk shit about Lee-Enfield ammunition.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the grease on the cartridges is NOT pig fat?

    2. Re:Don't care by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Lee-Enfield ammunition.

      For the purists among us, that rather predated the Lee-Enfield. More properly, it was just the Enfield back then. Or the Lee-Metford....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  14. Ersatzfritten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Made from the finest recycled nylon polymers.

  15. setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this was all preplanned by pepsi and facebook in order to give cover to there anticonservative antirepublican agenda. facebook and pepsi are long time democrat party funders and backers and will stop at nothing to undermine america democracy and colllude with forin powers.

  16. ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by gavron · · Score: 5, Informative

    Somewhere between the GIzmodo article, which correctly pointed out that the Delhi court order applied only in India, and Slashdot, which implied that all of FB is blocking all these stories, something got lost.

    FIRST, Pepsi Co didn't get sued.
    SECOND, Pepsi Co didn't sue anyone.
    THIRD,It's an INTERIM court order, like we have here in the United States, called a temporary restraining order (TRO) and will require a hearing and proof and may be extended or completely withdrawn.
    FOURTH, It only applies in India, not the rest of the civilized world

    You can all relax now and quit bringing the US Constitution into it.

    E

  17. Never underestimate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the speed of stupid.

  18. When MegaFood Lawyers Up . . . by Gnostic+Teflon · · Score: 0

    When MegaFood lawyers up, it's time to look elsewhere. That routine practice by MegaFood is simply a slap down. Slap back.

  19. The More Things Change .... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We used to not be able to say things against kings and barons. Now we cannot say things against corporations or Jews.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:The More Things Change .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to not be able to say things against kings and barons. Now we cannot say things against corporations or Twitler.

      FTFY

    2. Re:The More Things Change .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about? The entire mainstream media attacks the president non-stop every day. If only they had been so critical when George Bush was starting illegal wars, but I guess the corporate media only gets upset when someone tries to renegotiate corrupt trade deals...

    3. Re:The More Things Change .... by WoOS · · Score: 1

      You just said something against corporations and the Jews, which per your statement shouldn't be possible. Can you please stop posting contradictions, my positronic circuits are starting to heat up.

    4. Re:The More Things Change .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You antisemitic piece of trash. You should be arrested and sent to prison for life, where you'll be raped by bubba every day. How dare you say bigoted things of Jews.

    5. Re:The More Things Change .... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      We used to not be able to say things against kings and barons. Now we cannot say things against corporations or Jews.

      Cool, Borat's posting on slashdot again.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:The More Things Change .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate America and the Jews

      Coolest. Band. Name. Ever.

    7. Re:The More Things Change .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you can't use it.

  20. Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So I could share this far and wide. Not because I believe it, but the very idea of an American company, (I know, I know, it’s PepsiCo, a worldwide multinational conglomerate that can’t really be called American any more than you could argue that there’s a meaningful difference between the water in the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic, since they meet and join and flow freely between the two and around the globe, kind of like PepsiCo and their money, I imagine,) but for a company based and started here, (as I think it was and don’t really care if it wasn’t, so I’m not going to even bother to look it up, because it doesn’t matter; it’s not really relevant to the point I’m making here,) to exploit the fact that an Indian Court of Law will grant their request and engage in censorship like this makes me want to exploit the fact that I am outside that court’s jurisdiction to help spread this rumor, even if it’s totally false, so as to help render it pointless for PepsiCo (which I’m now boycotting over this,) to have sought the order in the first place. (TBH though, I was already boycotting their products because most of them suck. Not really a boycott, more of a personal choice.)

    THAT SAID, HOWEVER... The truth is that if your product is such a bizarre thing, so far removed from any resemblance to real actual food or food precursor ingredients you claim it’s based on and/or made out of, that people find themselves legitimately wondering if maybe it’s actually made of plastic, (it’s probably not made of plastic, though; it’s probably made of wood pulp, much the way most shelf-stable “Parmesan” (hahaha) “cheese” is,) people probably shouldn’t be eating it, and such so-called “conspiracy theories” are a legitimate part of the discussion. Unless you have someone certified as insane, by some competent authority to do so, any allegation that that person is insane and shouldn’t be listened to, (as the words “conspiracy theory” are shorthand for,) is, from a rhetorical and argumentative standpoint, known as the fallacy of “poisoning the well”. For those of you not familiar, when you resort to poisoning the well, you are effectively admitting defeat and lose the argument. That people regard an argument that includes, “well, my opponent is a well-known crazy person,” as automatically forfeiting is HOW we maintain civil discourse, and have meaningful conversations.

    ALLOWING people (or PepsiCo) to get away with poisoning the well in the argument about whether or not their little plastic-like nightmare snack “foods” are or are not made of plastic REWARDS them for their misbehavior, and encourages others to do the same. Here’s another example I know will be popular on slashdot: people claiming “it’s all rigged,” and asserting any reporting that is not favorable, true or not, is “fake news!”

    Claims by certain individuals pretending to be elected leaders, are a perfect example of poisoning the well. “Don’t listen to people who tell you I’m a liar, because they’re all liars,” can’t be used in a real, legitimate argument. You have to prove the truth of what you’re saying through independently verifiable evidence, and asserting that you should believe simply because he says, “believe me” just doesn’t cut it.

    They really need to emphasize this more in schools... sorry, I digressed. Anyway...

    For any government, especially one like India’s, (let’s not forget they style themselves as “the world’s largest democracy,”) to reach its giant, government hand into the conversation and pluck voices out of it and silence them on PepsiCo’s behalf is straight-up bullshit. It’s a steep slope, and to spray a teflon-based or teflon-like lubricant all over it makes for legitimate slippery-slope concerns.

    Keep a sharp eye out, people... this is one of the things that happens when you don’t have your freedom to speak and express your beliefs protected in law, or you allow your government to walk all over that freedom.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sorry, I digressed. Anyway...

      Your entire rant is so filled with digressions that it is painful to read. But finally you seem to be trying to make a point ...

      For any government, especially one like India's, (let's not forget they style themselves as "the world's largest democracy,") to reach its giant, government hand into the conversation and pluck voices out of it and silence them on PepsiCo's behalf is straight-up bullshit.

      Even when you actually get around to trying to make a point you insert needless digression. But anyway ... it is not bullshit. Freedom of speech does not mean you have the inalienable right to spout deliberate lies intended to cause others harm. It's called either libel or slander, and just because PepsiCo is a multinational company doesn't mean you can try to damage them by lying about their products. You can express your opinion ("this tastes like plastic") but not post lies about it ("it's made of plastic"). This is case law, even in the country of the First Amendment.

    2. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      When one person says your food-like product is made out of plastic, that might be libel.

      When millions say your food-like product is made out of plastic... well, maybe it is made out of plastic.

    3. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of speech does not mean you have the inalienable right to spout deliberate lies intended to cause others harm.

      Yes it does. Lies are a human right.

      It's called either libel or slander

      Those laws are unconstitutional.

    4. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ...maybe it is made out of plastic.

      ...or might as well be.

      If it is easily accepted that your food is made out of plastic, and that this false claim hurts your business, then it is your own fault for making something so indistinguishable from plastic.

      Meanwhile many of the candies on the convenience store shelves are really made out of sand. Really. Nobody gives a shit. The claim doesnt hurt the business because they taste good, not like sand at all.

      We wont get started on the claim that Taco Bell's taco meat is really saw dust. I believe the official corporate stance on the matter was something like "No, it is only 70% saw dust!"

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When one person says your food-like product is made out of plastic, that might be libel.

      When millions say your food-like product is made out of plastic... well, maybe it is made out of plastic.

      In the world of the Internet, you can change one into millions in no times. Most people do NOT research but rather believe whatever outrageous info on the Internet. That is the problem. I will take this news as a grain of salt. Until I understand what really happened, I don't believe what you believe.

    6. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      it is not bullshit. Freedom of speech does not mean you have the inalienable right to spout deliberate lies intended to cause others harm. It's called either libel or slander

      If you had read the actual article, (or even the damn summary) you might have realized that many of the posts were SATIRE!

      Also, how is Facebook only supposed to take down the truly slanderous articles, which in most of the world is defined as knowingly posting false information. Most of these people don't know it's false!

      What the Indian Goverment is asking for is to censor a discussion people are having. In a free country we allow the truth to replace the falsehoods. In a repressive country speech is limited to only the things the government has decided is true.

    7. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      If you had read the actual article, (or even the damn summary) you might have realized that many of the posts were SATIRE!

      That's how shitposting works. Make the lie entertaining, and people will spread it just because it makes them smile. Then once people have heard the story three hundred times in their feed, it starts to feel true even if their logic is telling them it's not.

      In a free country we allow the truth to replace the falsehoods.

      When have you ever seen that happen before the damage was done?

      --
      Nope, no sig
    8. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then once people have heard the story three hundred times in their feed, it starts to feel true even if their logic is telling them it's not.

      For assuming that I, and others, simply must be that weak-minded, even if (especially if) we don't think so ourselves... fuck you, elitist asshole. For that, I deem thee to be utterly bereft of human worth.

      When have you ever seen that happen before the damage was done?

      When the liberal elitist assholes were kept in the dark until the last minute, and everyone else was prepared to restrain them.

    9. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      When millions say your food-like product is made out of plastic... well, maybe it is made out of plastic.

      What a remarkable universe you live in where a lie told a million times about a factual matter becomes fact. Here in the universe where Earth is, we have a saying. "Forty million Frenchmen can be wrong." Google it if you don't recognize it.

    10. Re:Kinda wish I had a Facebook Account by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Even when you actually get around to trying to make a point you insert needless digression. But anyway ... it is not bullshit. Freedom of speech does not mean you have the inalienable right to spout deliberate lies intended to cause others harm. It's called either libel or slander, and just because PepsiCo is a multinational company doesn't mean you can try to damage them by lying about their products. You can express your opinion ("this tastes like plastic") but not post lies about it ("it's made of plastic"). This is case law, even in the country of the First Amendment.

      This could be gotten around easily enough in two ways I can think of right off the top of my head. First, through the anonymizing power of the internet, and second, by prepending the words, "I think" to the allegation. Not much anyone can do about that, even in a place where there are laws concerning libel, since I'd be expressing an opinion (protected,) rather than fact, (which I'd have to back up with some sort of evidence). But I've not actually promulgated any such rumor, and I don't have a Facebook account with which to do so, either here or in India, so it's kind of a moot point. I was just grumbling at length about how messed up the censorship is, and no one forced you to read the post, though I appreciate that you took the time to do so.

      When I apologize for digression, (since I digress quite a bit, if you've read my other posts, you'd probably have picked up on that,) you know it's going to be bad, with even me realizing I'm doing it. I know I have a tendency to ramble, so thanks for taking the time to read what I wrote. I know these days there are many demands for peoples' time and it seems like there are never enough hours in a day and...

      Damn it, I'm doing it again. Sorry. :) Thanks for reading though. Seriously.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  21. incorrect definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not what conspiracy means

    1. Re:incorrect definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure it is...
      If pepsico is selling this shit with plastic in it and not telling anyone (or adding a "warning contains plastic") its a conspiracy by the management & employees of pepsico and possibly some government food inspection employees. If however plastic has accidently contaminated a batch then it is just an accident and not a conspiracy.

  22. Heh! by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone name a snack food that rhymes with mercury?

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    1. Re:Heh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is mercury in it as well!
      * posts fact on facebook *

    2. Re:Heh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone name a snack food that rhymes with mercury?

      I Hindi 'Kurkure' means crunchy.

    3. Re:Heh! by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What is the word for "shit?"

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  23. I wonder... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    ...how much Pepsico spends on advertising on Facebook. Pepsico don't need a court order. Maybe they're doing it to give Facebook an excuse/cover story.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  24. Why would it matter? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Half of the fast food I've enjoyed over the years (like twinkles) I just assumed was part or all plastic. Whatever. I say! It just passes through then, so I can't see why a rumor like that would matter. or have any effect beyond slightly increasing sales (see: Tide Pods).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why would it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of the fast food I've enjoyed over the years (like twinkles) I just assumed was part or all plastic. Whatever. I say! It just passes through then.

      Except when it doesn't. See: Melamine in Chinese baby milk.

    2. Re:Why would it matter? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Swallowing anything that your body can't break down is generally not very good for you. Plastic, metal and anything it can't really process might eventually come out, or it might not. And while it's in there you would have to have a PhD to speculate about what kind of interactions it might have with your body and the other food, your gut bacteria, and of course the dye and other crap they put in there to make it more appealing to you.

      I guess these rumours are more powerful in places like India where there is less enforcement of food safety standards. In the west we are used to just assuming anything on a supermarket shelf or restaurant menu is safe and has been tested and monitored. Having said that we did have the horse meat scandal, which is a shame because I actually liked the horse meat.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Why would it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out sucralose, an artificial sweetener. It's basically a chlorinated sugar which leaves your body mostly undigested and is basically non-biodegradable. Researchers even considered using sucralose as a compound for tracing communal waste water because of that property.

  25. Now that nobody can criticize them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that it's illegal to complain about the product, it's time to replace some of the more expensive ingredients.

  26. Re:ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    Right... so this time the boot of big money legalism is only stomping on the face of our Indian friends.

    This would never happen here in America. Because we have no bad laws, our leaders always put the common good before the interests of the corporate oligarchy, and our courts are not totally corrupt from top to bottom. Riiiiiight....

    If you believe that one, I've got a great deal - special for you! - on the Brooklyn Bridge.

  27. Re:they already do so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course we believe actual facts, were not paranoid lying alt right virgins in Moms basement. What sort of dumb fucking cunts believe such utter stupidity.
    Mostly Americans of course.

  28. Re:ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still sets a precedent that FB can and will block posts, weakening their defence against implementing censorship in other countries.

  29. Did you hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you hear that Kurkure is made of plastic?

  30. Blocked... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    The fact that the theories are blocked only draws attention to them and will inevitably recruit more people to believe them...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Blocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. There's two kinds of people passing this stuff: proper conspiracy nuts, and useful idiots mashing "share". The former, yes, you're right, but the harm comes when the latter get a good mob going. Drop the traffic and all that's left is the nuts mumbling over their breakfast, back to normal.

      (assuming good faith, otherwise there's also whoever seeded the lie)

  31. Re:ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FOURTH, It only applies in India, not the rest of the civilized world

    India civilized?? you wouldn't know it from reading the news.

  32. Taco Bell meat by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Back in 2001 or so I was told Taco Bell's ground beef was not meat, but a paste. I responded with: "Wow that's some good paste then I guess."

    Years later I saw the lawsuit claiming their beef was 11% meat and I was surprised it had SO MUCH meat in it.

    1. Re:Taco Bell meat by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Years later I saw the lawsuit claiming their beef was 11% meat and I was surprised it had SO MUCH meat in it.

      Wow! 11%! I am right there with you. Might have to run for the border this weekend.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Taco Bell meat by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      So the wood dust just absorbs a bunch of fat and makes it look and taste (roughly) like meat?
      (Really it just tastes like salty spices which are so heavy it would be difficult to know what it was.)

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  33. Olestra Reborn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The olestra of this generation?

  34. Wait ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... so it's good to panic about unscientific crap when it's about "GMO", but it's bad to panic about unscientific crap when it's something about plastic food in India, and censorship is good if it's about Republicans or Indian plastic food, but bad if it's about anything else ...

    How dya all keep up with this ever shifting set of rules?

    1. Re:Wait ... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I think the issue is, that as people learn more about processed food, it is no surprise that plastic would be used as a filler. Most people probably just shrug and pop open another bag.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  35. Kurkure is made of plastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kurkure is made of plastic.

  36. Okay, fine... by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    Personally, if I were running a social network faced with this kind of crap from an Orwellian corporation with no sense of humor, I'd simply respond to them along these lines: "Alright. You want us to block critical comments about one of your brands? No problem -- but we can't actually afford to manually block every single post that's critical of your products... so this is going to have to be a keyword block. And just so you're aware: because of the way in which a keyword blocking feature operates, that likely means that all posts about your product are potentially subject to being blocked, real or fake."

    I would then proceed to simply block the keyword "Kurkure."

  37. This is a test by forkfail · · Score: 1

    And a successful one, at that.

    --
    Check your premises.
  38. Must be true if they're trying to hide it... by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Must be true if they're trying to hide it...

  39. Really seriously by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Really seriously :

    Environmentally-conscious European companies are actually replacing plastic packaging material (expanded polystyrene foam peanuts) with biodegradable packaging material such as corn starch packing peanuts - basically unflavored corn puffs.
    (Examples of shops: Conrad, Lush, etc.)

    So yeah, plastic and corn puffs *ARE* mutually interchangeable indeed :-D

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  40. Re:ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhere between the GIzmodo article, which correctly pointed out that the Delhi court order applied only in India, and Slashdot, which implied that all of FB is blocking all these stories, something got lost.

    about 50+ american IQ points.

  41. Tvtropes' Humanitarian ? by DrYak · · Score: 1

    All of my favorite foods are vegetarians as well.

    ...free range Vegetarians, I hope ?

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  42. That's no plastic by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sure but Melamine is in no way plastic, and is not inert in the way plastic is (because it's mimicking as something else). Good wholesome plastic is like someone riding by on a bicycle, tipping their hat to you and saying "Good day sir!" as they ride along never to be seen again.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. Re:ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A precedent that spreading lies is somehow not only allowed but encouraged? Fucking stupid idea

  44. Which false rumor? by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Which false rumor resulted in a Hillary Clinton voter voting for Trump?

    I was going to vote for socialism until I took a Russian meme to the feed.

  45. WRONG. PEOPLE are accountable for their actions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This is India where completely bogus rumors on social media have resulted in angry hordes of people burning or stoning innocents to death.

    WRONG.

    Angry hordes of PEOPLE stoned innocents to death.

    Read: PEOPLE.

    STOP BLAMING TOOLS FOR WHAT PEOPLE DO.

    Your new spouted pretext for social control is absolute bullshit.

  46. Oh, great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First China, now India won't take our waste plastic.

  47. Everything for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they can't down promote fake news or racist content but they can block big corp gossip, where is the let's everyone expose their points of viene.

  48. Re:ONLY IN INDIA!!! Only temporary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your zeal to hate the US you're missing the point. This article is about India and a temporary restraining order. It's not about the world, or big censorship, and it's not affecting anyone other than Indians for the short time until FB fights it.

    Less coffee and more reading will do you well.